it does stress me out a little - perhaps for different reasons depending on my mood - that so much writing advice i see floating around feels like... just really irrelevant to almost every book i have ever loved and also any book i've ever read that's more than like a couple decades old lol. post brought to you by thinking about being in middle school and reading on a writing forum somewhere that double adjectives were bad and finding myself unconvinced by this assertion and then reading tender is the night at age 20 and thinking "oh, i see, it's just that you have to make sure that each adjective is doing something different and that their pairing is a surprise that makes each of them more interesting as a selection" ("From Nicole flowed a vast tragic apathy" - no offense but i would not trust the taste or advice of someone who would cut either of those). nowadays i would also amend that to add like "well unless some kind of excessive repetition is precisely the point as with the litany of adjectives that describes rosemary when we first meet her, big bright bold etc. etc. etc." but i basically think i was right and i am not really amenable to arguments that i am wrong because of how much i as a reader like reading fitzgerald's exceptional ear for the well placed double adjective, and of my general belief that i don't believe in trying to write like writing that you don't like because why would you. anyway that's a small detail and possibly a niche topic (it certainly has the ring of something passed around as gospel but i don't recall seeing it out in the wild often). but it does actually go for like most writing advice i have seen out in the world.