Avatar

Unlucky and Eclectic

@unluckycalcifer / unluckycalcifer.tumblr.com

He/they. 29. ACAB. Punch Nazis. Capitalism is the virus. People deserve to live freely. Enjoy!

the best part is a whole bunch of artists took him up on it so thereโ€™s just an entire thread of Grunkle Stan face-punching nazis and itโ€™s beautiful

Unrelated, but entirely needed.

Avatar
detectivepikalloyd

My friend @curzec got hers signed by Alex not too long ago!

Sure did! Hereโ€™s the saga

Original drawing

Redrawn version signed!

Avatar
comet-was-here

MIGHT I ADD THAT THE PINES FAMILY IS CANONICALLY JEWISH!!! YOU PUNCH THAT NAZI STAN YOU PUNCH HIM RIGHT IN HIS UGLY FACE

Love Alex Hirsch

Cory Booker has been talking in the senate for over 20 hours now

Heโ€™s not filibustering. Heโ€™s protesting the current administration.

For those of you from outside the US or those of you who didnโ€™t pay attention in government class, in the US senate thereโ€™s really no limit to the amount of time a senator can speak. So sometimes if they donโ€™t want a bill to pass they just. Donโ€™t stop talking. To hopefully get past the deadline to vote on a bill. This is called filibustering.

Senator Cory Booker isnโ€™t doing that. Heโ€™s disrupting โ€œthe normal business of the United States Senate for as long as I am physically ableโ€. Just in protest. This doesnโ€™t usually happen.

Heโ€™s less than 20 minutes away from breaking the record of the longest speech given on the senate floor

Cory Booker has officially broken Strom Thurmondโ€™s record for longest speech on the senate floor and heโ€™s still going

For those of you wondering what heโ€™s been talking about this whole time, his staff wrote down a bunch of stuff for him to read like stories from people across the political spectrum opposed to what the administration is doing. Heโ€™s also been telling personal anecdotes about meeting important civil rights leaders and other democratic senators have been pausing him for โ€œquestionsโ€ but the questions have been as long as a small speech and have both served the purpose of giving him a second to sit down and updating him on the news that heโ€™s been missing while heโ€™s been talking.

He has yielded the floor at 25 hrs and 4 mins. His eyes are so wide they look like theyโ€™re going to bug out of his skull so I donโ€™t blame him for stopping. He said to go out and get in some good trouble.

Have you ever looked closely at a car windshield?

The edge of the glass is painted where it is glued to the car but it has these small dots between the clear and painted glass.

These are there for a reason. When the sun hits the glass the painted areas and the clear areas will absorb heat at different rates. This causes the glass to expand and contract differently putting stress on the glass.

These dots help the glass to warm up more evenly over a larger area so the glass does not suffer stress that could cause it to spontaneously explode.

Fun fact: the Tesla cybertruck doesnโ€™t have these.

Yes, the glass will spontaneously crack or explode in the sun.

THIS SUMMERS GONNA BE SO COOL

I know this is going to make me sound pretensions but I have to get it off my chest. I feel an unimaginable rage when someone posts a photo and is like "this picture looks like a renaissance painting lol" when the photo clearly has the lighting, colors and composition of a baroque or romantic painting. There are differences in these styles and those differences are important and labeling every "classical" looking painting as renaissance is annoying and upsetting to me. And anytime I come across one of those posts I have to put down my phone and go take a walk because they make me so mad

In case you're curious here's what I mean.

Renaissance(distinct lines, stability and the individual man):

Baroque (bold, chaotic, dramatic):

Romantic(romanticize the simple hard working life):

Do you see the difference?

this post has re-wired my brain in the best way

I assigned a writing prompt a few weeks ago that asked my students to reflect on a time when someone believed in them or when they believed in someone else. One of my students began to panic.

โ€œI have to ask Google the prompt to get some ideas if I canโ€™t just use AI,โ€ she pleaded and then began typing into the search box on her screen, โ€œA time when someone believed in you.โ€

โ€œItโ€™s about you,โ€ I told her. โ€œYouโ€™ve got your life experiences inside of your own mind.โ€ It hadnโ€™t occurred to her โ€” even with my gentle reminder โ€” to look within her own imagination to generate ideas. One of the reasons why I assigned the prompt is because learning to think for herself now, in high school, will help her build confidence and think through more complicated problems as she gets older โ€” even when sheโ€™s no longer in a classroom situation.

Sheโ€™s only in ninth grade, yet sheโ€™s already become accustomed to outsourcing her own mind to digital technologies, and it frightens me.

When I teach students how to write, Iโ€™m also teaching them how to think. Through fits and starts (a process that can be both frustrating and rewarding), high school English teachers like me help students get to know themselves better when they use language to figure out what they think and how they feel.

. . .

If you believe, as I do, that writing is thinking โ€” and thinking is everything โ€” things arenโ€™t looking too good for our students or for the educators trying to teach them. In addition to teaching high school, Iโ€™m also a college instructor, and I see this behavior in my older students as well.

-----

This! This is what scares me the most about AI! Physical exertion is difficult if someone isn't used to it, and it gets easier the more often it's done. When it's done often enough, it becomes a habit. Mental exertion is exactly the same. Thinking is a learned skill just like a sport is, and an entire generation is growing up without that most critical skill.

An unthinking populace is a more easily controlled populace.

One of my professors had a wrong date of birth on his wikipedia page and when he fixed it a wiki editor changed it back because โ€˜the subject of an article canโ€™t change the article as theyโ€™re not a neutral sourceโ€™. Which is understandable for the body of the article but incredibly funny of this editor to be pedantic about a university professors birthday

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.