For several years there was a downward trend in the amount of young men refusing to perform either military or civil service, but records from recent years suggest that numbers are once more on the rise.
The usual sentence served by conscientious objectors is between seven and eight months in prison. Judges can now replace this penalty with a more lenient punishment in the form of an enforced period of electronic tagging.
All Finnish men aged 18 and over are required to serve either military or civilian service, with exceptions made for disabilities and religious convictions. The usual minimum military service is about six months, with longer requirements of those who opt for civilian service. Women may serve in the Finnish Defence Forces on a volunteer basis.
Still no picnic
Last spring, conscientious objector Elmo Kalvas was given an electronic tagging device to strap to his leg. He's been subjected to random drug and alcohol tests and has to stick to a strict timetable.
"It was kind of a tough experience,” he says. “When something was locked into the schedule, I had to follow it. That was that.”
Kalvas currently finds himself in the Laukaa Open Prison because he was running behind the agreed schedule.
"The system is really cold, as the machine does the time-keeping on your behalf. The reasons aren’t taken into account in any way,” he says.
Table: Tagged or locked up?
In prison | Tagged | |
2000 | 56 | |
2001 | 45 | |
2002 | 72 | |
2003 | 55 | |
2004 | 55 | |
2005 | 60 | |
2006 | 53 | |
2007 | 39 | |
2008 | 38 | |
2009 | 22 | |
2010 | 24 | |
2011 | 20 | |
2012 | 6 | 6 |
2013 (until 1.12.) | 12 | 28 |
Source: Criminal Sanctions Agency
Information on the number of conscientious objectors varies, but according to police information the amount of cases reported is more than in previous years.
The Civilian Service Centre (CSC) estimates that this year the number of total objectors is likely to rise to about 40.
"Certainly the biggest increase is due to the fact that in November 2011 this form of control punishment came into force. Under half of these sorts of judgments involved the imposition of the tag, and this affected quite a lot of civilian and military service objectors,” says Mikko Reijonen of the CSC.
Table: Number of conscientious objectors by year
2008 | 31 |
2009 | 27 |
2010 | 24 |
2011 | 21 |
2012 | 41 |
Source: Police
Kaj Raninen, secretary of the Union of Conscientious Objectors, believes that the reasons are also linked to the current climate of social debate.
"At last Finland has joined the wider debate on the future of the military conscription system and its justification,” Raninen says. “It follows that more often young men want to protest that system, also in the form of conscientious objection.”
Conscientious objectors are still relatively few and far between comparative to those who decide to fulfil the requirement of either civilian or military service.