Perguntas sobre exemplo de orações com, e a definição e o uso de "Robots"

A: I don’t understand this sentence

A: The meaning of both sentences in this example is the same, but the first is correct.
"To" shows direction. In this case, robots give help to humans.
"For" shows purpose. "Robots are useful for helping humans..." or "Robots are useful tools for humans (to use)..." would be better ways to use "for."

A: Robots change people's lives.
Robots are making our lives different.

A: × Robots can’t replace the human because human can create our future with our imagination,but robots don’t have imagination so far.
✓ Robots can’t replace humans because we can shape the future with the power of our imagination. Additionally, robots lack the ability to imagine.

A: コメントで、私の前のコメントみたいに、補正がきれいにできませんけど、やってみます✍️

AI「There’ll be one thing left. The ability to become happy.」

「No matter how big of a result an AI shows, we (the AI), don’t have the function to enjoy a feeling, nor sense of accomplishment. We may recognise tastes, beauty, or whatnot, but we don’t feel it.」

「Even though we feature the advanced technologies to make people happy, we have no ability to feel happiness.」

「Therefore, we’ll leave it to you to become happy and enjoy your life.」

「That’ll surely be the last job for you, human being.」

A: × For example,if robots were made do a lot of simple work,human would be more eager to do difficult tasks and imaginative work.
✓ For example, if robots were made to do a lot of simple work, then humans would be more eager to do difficult tasks and imaginative work.

Assuming that you wanted to say that robots could do the easy tasks so humans could have more time to do the difficult ones, you could also say:

Robots enable humans to work more efficiently. For example, if robots were made to do simpler tasks, then humans would be able to do difficult and imaginative work.

Eager would mean "wanting something very much" and I think "able" is more appropriate in the sentence.

Hope this helps! ^~^

A: × Robots can do time-consuming things and cut unnecessary time of people working at the factories and the offices.
✓ Robots can do time-consuming tasks for people who work in factories and offices, therefore saving them time.

× For example, future robots can crunch numbers more correctly than humans without mistakes, carry any heave luggage to wherever we want, and narrow down prospective employees checking resumes at a glance without doing job interviews.
✓ For example, future robots can crunch numbers more correctly than humans without making mistakes, carry heavy luggage to wherever we want, and narrow down prospective employees by checking resumes at a glance without having to do job interviews.

A: "most likely will" -> "will most likely"

"which against to RUlE 1(protect yourself)." -> "which is against the First Law (protect yourself)."

Assuming you are talking about Asimov's Three Laws. Also "Protect yourself" is the third law.

If you are referring to something else, " Rule 1" or "the first rule" is fine.