Skip to content

feat: Extend multiple sections type of escapeAssertion #180

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 31, 2021

Conversation

Gabriel-403
Copy link
Contributor

At present, only p < int > is supported. We should consider more forms. For example, consider supporting P < string > to meet the following test cases
r.attr.value == p.attr
r.attp.value || p.attr
r.attp.value && p.attr
r.attp.value >p.attr
r.attp.value <p.attr
r.attp.value +p.attr
r.attp.value -p.attr
r.attp.value *p.attr
r.attp.value /p.attr
!r.attp.value /p.attr'
g(r.sub, p.sub) == p.attr
g(r.sub,p.sub) == p.attr
(r.attp.value || p.attr)p.u

Signed-off-by: Gabriel-403 <1499015923@qq.com>
expect(util.escapeAssertion('!r.attp.value /p.attr')).toEqual('!r_attp.value /p_attr');
expect(util.escapeAssertion('g(r.sub, p.sub) == p.attr')).toEqual('g(r_sub, p_sub) == p_attr');
expect(util.escapeAssertion('g(r.sub,p.sub) == p.attr')).toEqual('g(r_sub,p_sub) == p_attr');
expect(util.escapeAssertion('(r.attp.value || p.attr)p.u')).toEqual('(r_attp.value || p_attr)p_u');
Copy link
Member

@nodece nodece Aug 28, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

could you add more cases, so like:

r1.value == p1.value
r2.value == p4.value
r_app1.value == p.value
r_app1.value == p_app1.value
rapp1.value == p.value
rapp1.value == papp1.value

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This matching method will be supported in the future!

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You are solving is this problem, why should you support this in the future?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@nodece It looks like we can not read the policy type like r_app1? sec + Model.getKeySuffix(i) will return like r1 r2 and so on.

private loadSection(cfg: ConfigInterface, sec: string): void {
let i = 1;
for (;;) {
if (!this.loadAssertion(cfg, sec, sec + Model.getKeySuffix(i))) {
break;
} else {
i++;
}
}
}

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@sagilio thanks for your point.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @Gabriel-403, thanks for your contribution, casbin cannot support the policy type like r_app1, so you need to reset escapeAssertion method, and append the r1.value == p1.value and r2.value == p4.value to test cases.

@Gabriel-403 Gabriel-403 force-pushed the feat_escapeAssertion branch from 31fa931 to d90393d Compare August 28, 2021 18:35
Signed-off-by: Gabriel-403 <1499015923@qq.com>
@Gabriel-403 Gabriel-403 force-pushed the feat_escapeAssertion branch from d90393d to 6394883 Compare August 28, 2021 18:38
@nodece nodece requested review from Zxilly and kingiw August 29, 2021 01:27
@nodece
Copy link
Member

nodece commented Aug 29, 2021

LGTM

@Zxilly Zxilly merged commit 4a8cc10 into casbin:v1 Aug 31, 2021
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 31, 2021
# [1.0.0-beta.4](v1.0.0-beta.3...v1.0.0-beta.4) (2021-08-31)

### Features

* Extend multiple sections type of escapeAssertion ([#180](#180)) ([4a8cc10](4a8cc10))
@github-actions
Copy link

🎉 This PR is included in version 1.0.0-beta.4 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 30, 2021
# 1.0.0 (2021-10-30)

### Bug Fixes

* `getImplicitPermissionsForUser` works with rmMap ([#272](#272)) ([0d59239](0d59239))
* add cache to generateGFunction ([e90bed2](e90bed2))
* add casbin-cpp to supported languages. ([b856734](b856734))
* add check if the adapter implements BatchAdapter ([a415838](a415838))
* add checks fieldValues to remove filtered policy ([6e144fb](6e144fb))
* Add examples. ([5cf950a](5cf950a))
* Add imports and batchFileAdapter implementation. ([3804c3d](3804c3d))
* add missing await ([523ce85](523ce85))
* Add tests for batch operations. ([e6ad7af](e6ad7af))
* Added ABAC policy logic to the private enforcer. ([c6fc487](c6fc487))
* Added util functions and util tests. ([72918bc](72918bc))
* check adapter type ([a74314d](a74314d))
* compatible types ([58242a5](58242a5))
* downgrade expression-eval back to v2.0.0 to avoid semantic-release failure, revert: casbin/node-casbin#222 ([8c0b1fd](8c0b1fd))
* downgrade target from ESNext to ES2017 for building esm ([7dfcf93](7dfcf93))
* fix buildRoleLinks to isolate groups ([0fb6ae7](0fb6ae7))
* fix CasbinJsGetPermissionForUser() ([#251](#251)) ([98c11f1](98c11f1))
* fix errror type ([dc9e5b5](dc9e5b5))
* fix logic error and add unittests ([82124e3](82124e3))
* fix ts4 build configuration ([a5034c8](a5034c8))
* fix unexpected parser action ([3074fa9](3074fa9))
* getImplicitPermissionsForUser missing domain parameter ([584624c](584624c))
* ignore print model ([f426131](f426131))
* improve load policy line ([9f12511](9f12511))
* improve tokens separator ([687e96f](687e96f))
* improve update into adapter before model ([0e9ccc6](0e9ccc6))
* Merge conflicts. ([7179b17](7179b17))
* remove lodash ([293a852](293a852))
* remove unused import ([2f8801c](2f8801c))
* remove use spread operator with await in array ([6e4f876](6e4f876))
* rename StringAdapter to MemoryAdapter ([aa92d40](aa92d40))
* stackoverflow in getImplicitRolesForUser ([d0fc49f](d0fc49f))
* support comments after expression ([c97cb26](c97cb26))
* Support for loadIncrementalFilteredPolicy ([72c2001](72c2001))
* support pattern function in 3rd args of g ([#199](#199)) ([27005f8](27005f8))
* tests. ([4da5291](4da5291))
* transfer from micromatch to picomatch ([#264](#264)) ([6be1b06](6be1b06))
* update expression-eval ([95de296](95de296))
* use csv-like format ([32ec20d](32ec20d))
* **builtinoperators:** fix function keyMatch3 ([1245aa0](1245aa0)), closes [#214](#214)
* **enforcer.ts:** fix deleteUser and improve deleteRole description ([1e6af16](1e6af16)), closes [#118](#118)
* **rbac:** fix defaultRoleManager hasRole method ([#211](#211)) ([4f3ba65](4f3ba65))
* update casbinJsGetPermissionForUser for v0.1.0 Casbin.js ([#186](#186)) ([6c277e8](6c277e8))

### Features

* add addMatchingFunc to DefaultRoleManager ([cc04e65](cc04e65))
* add BuildIncrementalRoleLinks ([b565005](b565005))
* add casbinJsGetPermissionForUser ([30ae126](30ae126))
* add enforceEx() ([#271](#271)) ([762efd9](762efd9))
* add getImplicitUsersForPermission ([ad9df14](ad9df14))
* add glob pattern to built-in function ([8415fc2](8415fc2))
* add initRmMap ([87f8011](87f8011))
* Add lazyload option at enforcer init method ([#289](https://github.com/casbin/casbin.js/issues/289)) ([e858dcb](e858dcb))
* add named addMatchingFunc ([65d3a26](65d3a26))
* add policyArrayToString and policyStringToArray to util ([e71b40f](e71b40f))
* add priority_policy_explicit support ([#250](#250)) ([763c18e](763c18e))
* add support for `in` operator ([a44c6a9](a44c6a9))
* add sync mode ([70e4e12](70e4e12))
* add unittest ([3cd5b73](3cd5b73))
* add updatePolicy() ([#234](#234)) ([a3218f1](a3218f1)), closes [#235](#235)
* avoid miss initialize() ([1394e8d](1394e8d))
* changing TypeScript target from ES6 to ES2017 ([6f4f50f](6f4f50f))
* controls whether to automatically notify Watcher ([2ce07c2](2ce07c2))
* enforceSync ([ff41f0a](ff41f0a))
* Extend multiple sections type of escapeAssertion ([#180](#180)) ([4a8cc10](4a8cc10))
* implement csv parser ([f2ddaab](f2ddaab))
* implement string adapater ([fabd784](fabd784))
* implementation cachedEnforcer ([0ace1a6](0ace1a6))
* improve effector for improve performance ([57de7b2](57de7b2))
* Multiple sections type ([2635601](2635601))
* RBAC with Domains API ([5e49b41](5e49b41))
* support RBAC for syncedEnforcer ([#150](#150)) ([2bf4299](2bf4299))
* sync with upstream ([ca4b572](ca4b572))
* synchronized enforcer ([ecec514](ecec514))
* use new license format ([284d2a4](284d2a4))

### improvement

* convert all management_api to async function ([e9f4d38](e9f4d38))

### BREAKING CHANGES

* **model** addPolicies, removePolicies and removeFilteredPolicy returns [boolean, string[][]]
* - provides a new interface for Effector
* see #
@github-actions
Copy link

🎉 This PR is included in version 1.0.0 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants