v.20, n. 34 (2022) by Stela Meçaj
Objective: This paper is dedicated to Artificial Intelligence and it consists in identifying the ... more Objective: This paper is dedicated to Artificial Intelligence and it consists in identifying the role and functions performed by Artificial Intelligence by noting the innovations brought by the introduction of this technology. Artificial Intelligence seems to be the most successful achievement of scientists today. As a result of this development and widespread use have arisen discussions on the legal regulation of Artificial Intelligence.
Methodology: The main methodological approach applied is the normative approach. The paper will be based on the qualitative method, which consists of collecting and processing data in order to compare and interpret the provisions or policies that provide for artificial intelligence. The following research methods will be applied in this paper: research method, descriptive method, comparative and analytical method, interpretive analysis method and illustrative method.
Results:There is still no proper legislative framework on Artificial Intelligence. Despite not having a consolidated legal framework, states have made the first efforts in drafting legal acts and norms governing the field of Artificial Intelligence. From the concrete analysis of existing legislative acts in many countries, we conclude that the intention of the legislator in trying to regulate the field of Artificial Intelligence arises as a result of the disadvantages of using these technologies, their widespread use and ability to influence the way of the development of many processes.
Contributions: The article contributes to the theoretical treatment of Artificial Intelligence by arguing on the problems of its legal regulation.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Papers by Stela Meçaj
Mediterranean journal of social sciences, May 5, 2016
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, Aug 7, 2021
This study goal is to analyze the role of international and national actors such as international... more This study goal is to analyze the role of international and national actors such as international organizations and different states, in our case Albania, taking into account the legal application measures or instruments, in order to defeat Covid-19 situation. The whole study relies on the qualitative method of research through the use of the ontological and epistemological approach of interpretation, as one of the most common methods of legal analysis. This research is analytical and conceptual one and surely is based on a methodology, which applies the method of interpretation, the research method in the literature, the comparative method too and refers to a current legal phenomenon such as Covid-19. To further extend, this analyze is developed about the concepts definition of hard law and soft law, surely is related to the mandatory and non-mandatory character of normative acts; as well as the impact that the instruments approved by international organizations and countries like Albania have to face with the defeat against Covid-19. The result of the study is that the character of legal norms defines the way of responding to the pandemic situation, meanwhile the normative character of hard law is not negotiable, soft law measures conceived as non-mandatory have had an impact on the orientation of decision makers towards measures against Covid-19. At the end of the paper we
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Lex Portus
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
European Science Review, 2021
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 2021
This study goal is to analyze the role of international and national actors such as international... more This study goal is to analyze the role of international and national actors such as international organizations and different states, in our case Albania, taking into account the legal application measures or instruments, in order to defeat Covid-19 situation. The whole study relies on the qualitative method of research through the use of the ontological and epistemological approach of interpretation, as one of the most common methods of legal analysis. This research is analytical and conceptual one and surely is based on a methodology, which applies the method of interpretation, the research method in the literature, the comparative method too and refers to a current legal phenomenon such as Covid-19. To further extend, this analyze is developed about the concepts definition of hard law and soft law, surely is related to the mandatory and non-mandatory character of normative acts; as well as the impact that the instruments approved by international organizations and countries like Albania have to face with the defeat against Covid-19. The result of the study is that the character of legal norms defines the way of responding to the pandemic situation, meanwhile the normative character of hard law is not negotiable, soft law measures conceived as non-mandatory have had an impact on the orientation of decision makers towards measures against Covid-19. At the end of the paper we
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Uploads
v.20, n. 34 (2022) by Stela Meçaj
Methodology: The main methodological approach applied is the normative approach. The paper will be based on the qualitative method, which consists of collecting and processing data in order to compare and interpret the provisions or policies that provide for artificial intelligence. The following research methods will be applied in this paper: research method, descriptive method, comparative and analytical method, interpretive analysis method and illustrative method.
Results:There is still no proper legislative framework on Artificial Intelligence. Despite not having a consolidated legal framework, states have made the first efforts in drafting legal acts and norms governing the field of Artificial Intelligence. From the concrete analysis of existing legislative acts in many countries, we conclude that the intention of the legislator in trying to regulate the field of Artificial Intelligence arises as a result of the disadvantages of using these technologies, their widespread use and ability to influence the way of the development of many processes.
Contributions: The article contributes to the theoretical treatment of Artificial Intelligence by arguing on the problems of its legal regulation.
Papers by Stela Meçaj
Methodology: The main methodological approach applied is the normative approach. The paper will be based on the qualitative method, which consists of collecting and processing data in order to compare and interpret the provisions or policies that provide for artificial intelligence. The following research methods will be applied in this paper: research method, descriptive method, comparative and analytical method, interpretive analysis method and illustrative method.
Results:There is still no proper legislative framework on Artificial Intelligence. Despite not having a consolidated legal framework, states have made the first efforts in drafting legal acts and norms governing the field of Artificial Intelligence. From the concrete analysis of existing legislative acts in many countries, we conclude that the intention of the legislator in trying to regulate the field of Artificial Intelligence arises as a result of the disadvantages of using these technologies, their widespread use and ability to influence the way of the development of many processes.
Contributions: The article contributes to the theoretical treatment of Artificial Intelligence by arguing on the problems of its legal regulation.