Fuzzy Dunlop stan account.
🌹
Unforgivably, this fails to mention that Moore was a victim of domestic violence at the hands of two of his ex-wives and instead opts to assert that he simply left them because he couldn't resist the charms of other women.
It goes on to revel in his self-deprecating assessment of his own acting abilities and then chooses to omit even the briefest look at his widely-aclaimed, career-best performance in The Man Who Haunted Himself.
His complex political views are simplified…
A film full of bizzare choices, the most unforgivable of all being the deliberate omission of any tangible representation of the mass-genocide of hundreds of thousands of human beings by way of instant incineration. There is a much-appreciated brief segue into the dangers of political passivity but this is passed over in favour of a test detonation sequence which, whilst exhilaratingly put together, really shouldn't be the focal point of the movie. If indeed as Oppenheimer says "they won't understand…
*sigh* Main takeaways:
1) Smug, centrist (closeseted neo-liberal) and twitter-brained. The "satire" is absolutely nauseating.
2) Crucially, it's impossible to care whodunnit because the characterisations are paper-thin and too much information is either withheld, shoe-horned in or, most bizzarely, presented as a surprise when already established?
3) It sorely lacks a performance and character as strong as Ana De Armas' in the first installment. The attempt to rectify this in the finale is embarrassingly poor.
4) Daniel Craig is having…