real life court jester, watching movies with my 3rd eye.
top 4 change often depending on The Mood™️
I FORGOT TO REVIEW THIS ONE
anyway! it was bad! showed up for mads mikkelsen only as i try to finish his filmography.
i'm honestly not sure how to feel about this one.
the performances are incredible but feel severely impacted by the poor dialogue & even poorer script. the cinematography, while stunning, doesn't quite seem to work out. i couldn't take anything seriously with all these ridiculous angles & overly dramatic lighting, it almost felt satirical or ironic. the worst part is that for how hard it tries to be unique & stand out, it hardly does at all. the film doesn't feel as special…
Mediocre incestuous porn posing as an avant garde psychedelic art film about the afterlife. apparently, if you add enough strobe lights to commit epileptic genocide, you can not only get away with slapping together your recent pornhub search history into a 2hr40min film, BUT you can also be praised for doing so! Congratulations everyone, you've been bamboozled into praising milf f*cks boy next door, stepsister f*king, & staring at women feeding their infants.
After watching a handful of his films and now this "magnum opus" of his, I can safely say I despise Gaspar Noe and his pseudo intellectual auteurist "genius". Noe uses dizzying camera movements and noise to evoke an emotion in his audience because his story alone is incapable of doing so. On top of that, these "signature" styles of his have absolutely no correlation to the story itself. There's no reason whatsoever for the disorienting camera during the opening scenes,…