Papers by Aleksander Dańda
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Archiwum Uj Dokt 2006 068, 2006
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Kultura i Polityka, 2011
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
The aim of the project is to perform a comparative analysis of ombudsman-type institutions in the... more The aim of the project is to perform a comparative analysis of ombudsman-type institutions in the United Kingdom and selected countries belonging to the Commonwealth of Nations. These institutions will be the object of research in the context of their place in extrajudicial systems of protection of individuals’ rights and freedoms. The task of the research team is to compare the institutions being researched with classic solutions adopted in Nordic countries and to try to determine whether any specific elements of mechanisms of human-rights protection by ombudsman-type institutions exist only in Anglo-Saxon countries and are not to be found in countries outside this cultural area. The authors also intend to consider whether Anglo-Saxon solutions are significantly different from solutions in other countries (mainly those in continental Europe) that have also adopted the institution of the ombudsman in their constitutional systems. The choice of the constitutional systems of the United Kingdom and former British dominions (Australia, Canada, New Zealand) as the object of research is justified by the strong similarities in the legal systems of these countries. British solutions have often served as a model for the countries selected for research or have affected, at least to some extent, the constitutional position and competences of particular state authorities. The essence of the project is an analysis of the normative foundations of the institutions being studied, an analysis of views of the doctrine of constitutional law and an overview of constitutional practice. The project will, therefore, make use of formal and dogmatic methods, legal comparative methods, methods used in political science, methods of analysis of previous doctrinal views and, to some extent, historical and legal methods (with regard to the presentation of the origin of the institutions concerned). Another important research tool will be a standardised questionnaire containing research questions useful for exegesis of legal provisions, analysis of doctrinal views and collection of data regarding the practical functioning of ombudsman-type institutions.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Australia w XX i XXI wieku. Polityka, historia i kultura, 2017
The Commonwealth of Australia is an untypical state concerning its political regime. Formally, in... more The Commonwealth of Australia is an untypical state concerning its political regime. Formally, in Australia there are two entities entitled to act as the head of state: the monarch and the monarch's representative-Governor-General. Has the Commonwealth of Australia got only one head of state? How does the question of dualistic head of state look like in the light of formal-legal regulations and how in the perspective of political practice? Is Australia still a monarchy yet or have there been some republican mechanisms of government inserted into the political practice of this state? Those are the research questions which dominate the scientific discourse presented in the article.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Ombudsman do spraw Irlandii Północnej – między dualizmem a uniformizmem 1. W 1967 roku Zjednocz... more Ombudsman do spraw Irlandii Północnej – między dualizmem a uniformizmem 1. W 1967 roku Zjednoczone Królestwo Wielkiej Brytanii i Irlandii Północnej wprowadziło do swego porządku konstytucyjnego nową instytucję – Parlamentarnego Komisarza do spraw Administracji (Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration) – bazującą na modelowych w tym względzie rozwiązaniach skandynawskich oraz pierwszej implementacji tegoż modelu do potrzeb państwa z kręgu kultury anglosaskiej (Nowa Zelandia w 1962 roku). Inaczej niż miało to miejsce w Kanadzie, a podobnie do rozwoju tejże instytucji w Nowej Zelandii, Wielka Brytania zdecydowała się nadać nowemu organowi charakter organu obejmującego swoją jurysdykcją terytorium całego państwa. Ten początkowy uniformistyczny rys instytucji ombudsmańskiej w Zjednoczonym Królestwie został zarzucony już kilka lat później, kiedy to powstawać zaczęły instytucje typu ombudsmańskiego, których kompetencje brytyjski prawodawca zdecydował się rozciągnąć na część sektora usług publicznych, wyłączając tym samym te sektory spod jurysdykcji Parlamentarnego Komisarza. W ten sposób z pozycji uniformizmu system ombudsmański Zjednoczonego Królestwa przeszedł wyraźnie na pozycje sprzyjające rozwiązaniom pluralistycznym.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Books by Aleksander Dańda
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Research Projects by Aleksander Dańda
The aim of the project is to perform a comparative analysis of ombudsman-type institutions in the... more The aim of the project is to perform a comparative analysis of ombudsman-type institutions in the United Kingdom and selected countries belonging to the Commonwealth of Nations. These institutions will be the object of research in the context of their place in extrajudicial systems of protection of individuals’ rights and freedoms. The task of the research team is to compare the institutions being researched with classic solutions adopted in Nordic countries and to try to determine whether any specific elements of mechanisms of human-rights protection by ombudsman-type institutions exist only in Anglo-Saxon countries and are not to be found in countries outside this cultural area. The authors also intend to consider whether Anglo-Saxon solutions are significantly different from solutions in other countries (mainly those in continental Europe) that have also adopted the institution of the ombudsman in their constitutional systems. The choice of the constitutional systems of the United Kingdom and former British dominions (Australia, Canada, New Zealand) as the object of research is justified by the strong similarities in the legal systems of these countries. British solutions have often served as a model for the countries selected for research or have affected, at least to some extent, the constitutional position and competences of particular state authorities.
The essence of the project is an analysis of the normative foundations of the institutions being studied, an analysis of views of the doctrine of constitutional law and an overview of constitutional practice. The project will, therefore, make use of formal and dogmatic methods, legal comparative methods, methods used in political science, methods of analysis of previous doctrinal views and, to some extent, historical and legal methods (with regard to the presentation of the origin of the institutions concerned). Another important research tool will be a standardised questionnaire containing research questions useful for exegesis of legal provisions, analysis of doctrinal views and collection of data regarding the practical functioning of ombudsman-type institutions.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Drafts by Aleksander Dańda
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Uploads
Papers by Aleksander Dańda
Books by Aleksander Dańda
Research Projects by Aleksander Dańda
The essence of the project is an analysis of the normative foundations of the institutions being studied, an analysis of views of the doctrine of constitutional law and an overview of constitutional practice. The project will, therefore, make use of formal and dogmatic methods, legal comparative methods, methods used in political science, methods of analysis of previous doctrinal views and, to some extent, historical and legal methods (with regard to the presentation of the origin of the institutions concerned). Another important research tool will be a standardised questionnaire containing research questions useful for exegesis of legal provisions, analysis of doctrinal views and collection of data regarding the practical functioning of ombudsman-type institutions.
Drafts by Aleksander Dańda
The essence of the project is an analysis of the normative foundations of the institutions being studied, an analysis of views of the doctrine of constitutional law and an overview of constitutional practice. The project will, therefore, make use of formal and dogmatic methods, legal comparative methods, methods used in political science, methods of analysis of previous doctrinal views and, to some extent, historical and legal methods (with regard to the presentation of the origin of the institutions concerned). Another important research tool will be a standardised questionnaire containing research questions useful for exegesis of legal provisions, analysis of doctrinal views and collection of data regarding the practical functioning of ombudsman-type institutions.