Mirza Hebib
Mirza Hebib is Assistant Professor in the field of Roman Law at the Faculty of Law University of Sarajevo. He successfully defended his doctoral thesis on "Usufruct (ususfructus): Application of Roman concept in Dubrovnik law" at the University of Sarajevo in December 2022.
After graduating from Elementary and High school in Dubrovnik, he enrolled in Faculty of Law University of Sarajevo, where he graduated in 2015. He received a masters of Laws degree summa cum laude in 2017. In the academic year 2021/22, he completed his postgraduate specialization in Roman law at the Institute of Roman Law and Laws of Eastern Mediterranean at University of Rome - La Sapienza. Also, he improved scientifically and professionally through study stays at University of Roehampton in London, Faculty of Law University of Ljubljana, Europa Institut of Saarland University in Saarbrucken and University of Magna Graecia in Catanzaro.
As the best student of undergraduate studies and master studies he was awarded two Gold Badges. He also received the Faculty of Law award for his contribution to the development, quality and reputation of the Faculty of Law Sarajevo on the 70th anniversary of its founding, Scholarship from the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Slovenia for scientific research, Scholarship for excellence and research scholarship of Konrad Adenauer Foundation, DAAD Leonhard Euler Scholarship, ERASMUS+ Scholarship, Recognition for the best project under the “Heart of Human Rights” program at Roehampton University in London, etc.
His narrower field of interest is Roman law and Roman Legal Tradition, Legal history of the Medieval Mediterranean and Comparative Private Law.
Phone: +387 (0)33 483-629
Address: 71000 Sarajevo, Obala Kulina bana 7
After graduating from Elementary and High school in Dubrovnik, he enrolled in Faculty of Law University of Sarajevo, where he graduated in 2015. He received a masters of Laws degree summa cum laude in 2017. In the academic year 2021/22, he completed his postgraduate specialization in Roman law at the Institute of Roman Law and Laws of Eastern Mediterranean at University of Rome - La Sapienza. Also, he improved scientifically and professionally through study stays at University of Roehampton in London, Faculty of Law University of Ljubljana, Europa Institut of Saarland University in Saarbrucken and University of Magna Graecia in Catanzaro.
As the best student of undergraduate studies and master studies he was awarded two Gold Badges. He also received the Faculty of Law award for his contribution to the development, quality and reputation of the Faculty of Law Sarajevo on the 70th anniversary of its founding, Scholarship from the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Slovenia for scientific research, Scholarship for excellence and research scholarship of Konrad Adenauer Foundation, DAAD Leonhard Euler Scholarship, ERASMUS+ Scholarship, Recognition for the best project under the “Heart of Human Rights” program at Roehampton University in London, etc.
His narrower field of interest is Roman law and Roman Legal Tradition, Legal history of the Medieval Mediterranean and Comparative Private Law.
Phone: +387 (0)33 483-629
Address: 71000 Sarajevo, Obala Kulina bana 7
less
InterestsView All (47)
Uploads
Books by Mirza Hebib
Tekst o historiji sudstva i sudova u Bosni i Hercegovini daje historijat pravosuđa u Bosni i Hercegovini i u tom okviru historijat zgrade Pravosudne palate. To je veoma važan segment ove publikacije, jer osigurava kontekst za razumijevanje značaja ove monumentalne građevine. Drugi tekst koji govori o pravnom aspektu ovog projekta daje neophodne podatke o propisima i postupku koji se tiču zaštite spomenika u koje spada Pravosudna palata. U cjelini smatram ovaj rukopis u djelovima koji se tiču pravnog aspekta, dobro koncipiranim, znalački napisanim i vrlo korisnim za stručnu i drugu javnost.
(Prof. dr. Fikret Karčić)
Papers by Mirza Hebib
Predmet ovog rada su ovlasti uporabe (ius utendi) plodouživanja sistematizirane kroz odredbe Zakona o stvarnim pravima Federacije BiH. Zakonske norme se podvrgavaju ontološkom tumačenju, u izvornom kontekstu koji su ova pravila imala u rimskom pravu u kojem su nastala. Kroz analizu rimske kazuistike, ukazuje se na moguća rješenja za različite situacije koje mogu nastati u sudskoj praksi, a koje slovom Zakona nisu izričito regulirane.
Today, usufruct (ususfructus) is almost identically regulated in many
European countries' private law. The similarity of our understanding of the
institute today, both in our country and in a number of other countries, is not accidental. It is a direct result of the legal nature, characteristics, and majority of the norms of usufruct being inherited from Roman law.
The article analyses the authority to use (ius utendi) of usufruct as
governed by the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina's Law on Property. Legal norms are subjected to an ontological interpretation in the original context that these rules had in the Roman law in which they were created. Possible solutions for various situations that may arise in court practice that are not expressly regulated by the letter of the law are indicated through the analysis of Roman casuistry.
Osnovna teza priloga je kako statusnopravna pitanja akademskog osoblja u konteksu osiguranja kvalitete treba rješavati primjenom komparativnog prava, poštujući jamstvo akademske autonomije i načela akademske slobode i akademske samouprave, pluralizma znanstvenih disciplina, očuvanja znanstvene produkcije od nacionalnog značaja te osnaživanja i poticanja internacionalizacije u oba smjera.
Sve navedeno je u korelaciji sa stvaranjem okružja u kojem će kriteriji za akademska napredovanja biti zahtjevniji u odnosu na postojeće, pri tom poštujući sveukupnu valorizaciju akademskog rada. Promjene normativnih okvira za cilj moraju imati kvalitetniji znanstveno-istraživački i nastavni rad te snažniju konkurentnost Univerziteta u Sarajevu u europskom okružuju.
Reforme je neophodno provoditi promišljeno, na temelju analiza s detektiranim problemima i ciljevima koji se žele postići, pritom uzimajući u obzir bh. društveni kontekst i aktualni opći pravni okvir u kojem Univerzitet u Sarajevu, kao najveća i najznačajnija visokoškolska ustanova u Bosni i Hercegovini, egzistira.
of the knight Pribislav Vukotić, written in Padua in 1475. As a merchant, renowned diplomat and advisor to Grand Duke Stjepan Vukčić Kosača, Vukotić acquired a considerable amount of property during his lifetime, which is the subject of his disposition. Based on fragments from Vukotić’s testament, in the literature so far, conclusions have been drawn in relation to what law looked like in medieval Bosnia, which without a deeper understanding of ius commune can easily lead to errors. The author points out the necessity of great caution in such an approach. The author concludes that Vukotić’s testament fits into the European ius commune in terms of its form, style and Christian influence, while the application of private law institutes (appointment of a substitute, protection of the unborn child, the issue of dowry and execution of the testament) is determined by various factors.
Roman law is one of the fundamental achievements of civilization and the
peculiarities of the European continent. It has endowed modern European law with fundamental values, concepts and institutes and without its study and teaching there is no possibility of understanding the European Legal Culture and theories of private law. Due to special roles in the development of law, the romanitas of an area sometimes stand out as one of the measures of European identity. The authors analyze the position of Roman law within the university legal education at the Higher Islamic Sharia - Theological School (1937-1945) and the Faculty of Law in Sarajevo (since 1946). They indicate the tradition of the union of mos italicus and mos gallicus in the study and teaching of Roman law, and the challenges and perspectives faced by Roman law as a subject and scientific discipline given the broader historical context.
Poredbeno promatrajući u razvoju europskog privatnog prava došlo je do recepcije obaju koncepata, s tim da će s vremenom koncept istovremenosti, gotovo u potpunosti, potisnuti koncept nadživjelosti. U radu se analiziraju razlozi zbog kojih do toga dolazi. Uspostavljajući vezu između rimskih korijena i europskog privatnog prava posebna pozornost posvećuje se mogućnosti primjene presumpcija u odnosu na slučajeve kada između smrti osoba postoji određena prostorna ili vremenska udaljenost ili ako je različit uzrok doveo do smrtnih posljedica. U konačnici rad jasno ukazuje na važnost rimskih pravila koja katkad mogu imati fundamentalni značaj u razumijevanju instituta suvremenog privatnog prava.
Certain Roman legal texts, most notably the Institutes of Gaius, show that it is not possible to constitute private law on the body of a deceased, since it belongs to Manes, gods of the afterlife. Nevertheless, detailed analysis of legal texts, which represents the first part of the paper, confirms the possibility of limited constitution of private law relating to corpse, but also gives answers about persons who have the right to organize funeral, cremation, transfer the body, build a monument, etc. The author believes that these rights, in the first place, belonged to the deceased, and if not specified, to the spouse and necessary successors were invited to exercise these rights. Inheritors are invited to acquire the rights in the order of precedence of legal inheritance, whether or not they inherited any assets. The second part of the paper comparatively presents conception of Canon Law as well as European Law in the age of modern codifications of private law during 19th century and the beginning of 20th century. Bearing in mind, there are unified views on these issues, author gives special attention to the legal culture of Austrian Civil Code, leaving the possibility to solve legal voids in the spirit of Roman legal tradition.
Tekst daje prikaz povijesti pravosuđa u Bosni i Hercegovini i u tom okviru povijest zgrade Pravosudne palače.
This text is Chapter of the book about Judical Palace in Sarajevo.
Text gives the history of the judiciary in Bosnia and Herzegovina and, within that context, the history of the Judicial Palace building.
U radu se na temelju dostupnih izvora i literature ukazuje na značaj i položaj otoka te se daju neka nova zapažanja o kuriozitetima mljetske povijesti ovog razdoblja. Posebna pažnja posvećena je analizi dvaju pravnih akata – Darovnici germanskog vojskovođe i barbarskog kralja Italije Odoakra, iz druge polovice V stoljeća i fragmentu testamenta nepoznatog zavještatelja, iz sredine VI stoljeća, u okviru kojih se u razmaku od jednog stoljeća spominje mljetsko imanje.
S druge strane i u ovom segmentu dubrovačkog nasljednog prava uočljive su naznake utjecaja rimskog prava, posebno vezano uz materijalno osiguravanje ženskih srodnika. U tom kontekstu, Dubrovčani su primjenjivali institute – udovičkog uživanja, fideikomisarne supstitucije i testamentalne legate.
U prvom dijelu rada izložen je sistem zakonskog nasljeđivanja srednjovjekovnog Dubrovnika. U drugom dijelu se posebno obrađuju instituti rimskog prava, primjenjivani s ciljem zaštite ženskih srodnika. Iako u posve drukčijem kontekstu, ukazano je i na tradiciju primjene određenih instituta u svrhu materijalnog osiguravanja žena još od perioda klasičnog rimskog prava.
intended for academic community and all interested in higher education system in Bosnia and
Herzegovina. The article is limited to the normative and institutional analysis of legal issues in
the higher education system in Canton Sarajevo, focusing on the challenges and perspectives of
the current reform. Issues regarding the organization, academic autonomy and academic selfgovernance
are specially analyzed.
The new normative framework for higher education represents a major challenge for the
government. The views of the government and university representatives are very different. For
the cantonal government, as a promoter, the new law introduces new positive and reformative
measures, such as financial integration and improvement of quality of the education process.
The Academic Community believes that this Law is contrary to the B&H Framework Law on
Higher Education and that it derogates principles of academic autonomy, academic selfgovernance
and academic freedom.
In the article special attention is directed to University of Sarajevo, as the oldest and largest
institution of higher education in Bosnia and Herzegovina, whose position, organization and
functioning is the backbone of the proposed law.
Book Reviews by Mirza Hebib
Tekst o historiji sudstva i sudova u Bosni i Hercegovini daje historijat pravosuđa u Bosni i Hercegovini i u tom okviru historijat zgrade Pravosudne palate. To je veoma važan segment ove publikacije, jer osigurava kontekst za razumijevanje značaja ove monumentalne građevine. Drugi tekst koji govori o pravnom aspektu ovog projekta daje neophodne podatke o propisima i postupku koji se tiču zaštite spomenika u koje spada Pravosudna palata. U cjelini smatram ovaj rukopis u djelovima koji se tiču pravnog aspekta, dobro koncipiranim, znalački napisanim i vrlo korisnim za stručnu i drugu javnost.
(Prof. dr. Fikret Karčić)
Predmet ovog rada su ovlasti uporabe (ius utendi) plodouživanja sistematizirane kroz odredbe Zakona o stvarnim pravima Federacije BiH. Zakonske norme se podvrgavaju ontološkom tumačenju, u izvornom kontekstu koji su ova pravila imala u rimskom pravu u kojem su nastala. Kroz analizu rimske kazuistike, ukazuje se na moguća rješenja za različite situacije koje mogu nastati u sudskoj praksi, a koje slovom Zakona nisu izričito regulirane.
Today, usufruct (ususfructus) is almost identically regulated in many
European countries' private law. The similarity of our understanding of the
institute today, both in our country and in a number of other countries, is not accidental. It is a direct result of the legal nature, characteristics, and majority of the norms of usufruct being inherited from Roman law.
The article analyses the authority to use (ius utendi) of usufruct as
governed by the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina's Law on Property. Legal norms are subjected to an ontological interpretation in the original context that these rules had in the Roman law in which they were created. Possible solutions for various situations that may arise in court practice that are not expressly regulated by the letter of the law are indicated through the analysis of Roman casuistry.
Osnovna teza priloga je kako statusnopravna pitanja akademskog osoblja u konteksu osiguranja kvalitete treba rješavati primjenom komparativnog prava, poštujući jamstvo akademske autonomije i načela akademske slobode i akademske samouprave, pluralizma znanstvenih disciplina, očuvanja znanstvene produkcije od nacionalnog značaja te osnaživanja i poticanja internacionalizacije u oba smjera.
Sve navedeno je u korelaciji sa stvaranjem okružja u kojem će kriteriji za akademska napredovanja biti zahtjevniji u odnosu na postojeće, pri tom poštujući sveukupnu valorizaciju akademskog rada. Promjene normativnih okvira za cilj moraju imati kvalitetniji znanstveno-istraživački i nastavni rad te snažniju konkurentnost Univerziteta u Sarajevu u europskom okružuju.
Reforme je neophodno provoditi promišljeno, na temelju analiza s detektiranim problemima i ciljevima koji se žele postići, pritom uzimajući u obzir bh. društveni kontekst i aktualni opći pravni okvir u kojem Univerzitet u Sarajevu, kao najveća i najznačajnija visokoškolska ustanova u Bosni i Hercegovini, egzistira.
of the knight Pribislav Vukotić, written in Padua in 1475. As a merchant, renowned diplomat and advisor to Grand Duke Stjepan Vukčić Kosača, Vukotić acquired a considerable amount of property during his lifetime, which is the subject of his disposition. Based on fragments from Vukotić’s testament, in the literature so far, conclusions have been drawn in relation to what law looked like in medieval Bosnia, which without a deeper understanding of ius commune can easily lead to errors. The author points out the necessity of great caution in such an approach. The author concludes that Vukotić’s testament fits into the European ius commune in terms of its form, style and Christian influence, while the application of private law institutes (appointment of a substitute, protection of the unborn child, the issue of dowry and execution of the testament) is determined by various factors.
Roman law is one of the fundamental achievements of civilization and the
peculiarities of the European continent. It has endowed modern European law with fundamental values, concepts and institutes and without its study and teaching there is no possibility of understanding the European Legal Culture and theories of private law. Due to special roles in the development of law, the romanitas of an area sometimes stand out as one of the measures of European identity. The authors analyze the position of Roman law within the university legal education at the Higher Islamic Sharia - Theological School (1937-1945) and the Faculty of Law in Sarajevo (since 1946). They indicate the tradition of the union of mos italicus and mos gallicus in the study and teaching of Roman law, and the challenges and perspectives faced by Roman law as a subject and scientific discipline given the broader historical context.
Poredbeno promatrajući u razvoju europskog privatnog prava došlo je do recepcije obaju koncepata, s tim da će s vremenom koncept istovremenosti, gotovo u potpunosti, potisnuti koncept nadživjelosti. U radu se analiziraju razlozi zbog kojih do toga dolazi. Uspostavljajući vezu između rimskih korijena i europskog privatnog prava posebna pozornost posvećuje se mogućnosti primjene presumpcija u odnosu na slučajeve kada između smrti osoba postoji određena prostorna ili vremenska udaljenost ili ako je različit uzrok doveo do smrtnih posljedica. U konačnici rad jasno ukazuje na važnost rimskih pravila koja katkad mogu imati fundamentalni značaj u razumijevanju instituta suvremenog privatnog prava.
Certain Roman legal texts, most notably the Institutes of Gaius, show that it is not possible to constitute private law on the body of a deceased, since it belongs to Manes, gods of the afterlife. Nevertheless, detailed analysis of legal texts, which represents the first part of the paper, confirms the possibility of limited constitution of private law relating to corpse, but also gives answers about persons who have the right to organize funeral, cremation, transfer the body, build a monument, etc. The author believes that these rights, in the first place, belonged to the deceased, and if not specified, to the spouse and necessary successors were invited to exercise these rights. Inheritors are invited to acquire the rights in the order of precedence of legal inheritance, whether or not they inherited any assets. The second part of the paper comparatively presents conception of Canon Law as well as European Law in the age of modern codifications of private law during 19th century and the beginning of 20th century. Bearing in mind, there are unified views on these issues, author gives special attention to the legal culture of Austrian Civil Code, leaving the possibility to solve legal voids in the spirit of Roman legal tradition.
Tekst daje prikaz povijesti pravosuđa u Bosni i Hercegovini i u tom okviru povijest zgrade Pravosudne palače.
This text is Chapter of the book about Judical Palace in Sarajevo.
Text gives the history of the judiciary in Bosnia and Herzegovina and, within that context, the history of the Judicial Palace building.
U radu se na temelju dostupnih izvora i literature ukazuje na značaj i položaj otoka te se daju neka nova zapažanja o kuriozitetima mljetske povijesti ovog razdoblja. Posebna pažnja posvećena je analizi dvaju pravnih akata – Darovnici germanskog vojskovođe i barbarskog kralja Italije Odoakra, iz druge polovice V stoljeća i fragmentu testamenta nepoznatog zavještatelja, iz sredine VI stoljeća, u okviru kojih se u razmaku od jednog stoljeća spominje mljetsko imanje.
S druge strane i u ovom segmentu dubrovačkog nasljednog prava uočljive su naznake utjecaja rimskog prava, posebno vezano uz materijalno osiguravanje ženskih srodnika. U tom kontekstu, Dubrovčani su primjenjivali institute – udovičkog uživanja, fideikomisarne supstitucije i testamentalne legate.
U prvom dijelu rada izložen je sistem zakonskog nasljeđivanja srednjovjekovnog Dubrovnika. U drugom dijelu se posebno obrađuju instituti rimskog prava, primjenjivani s ciljem zaštite ženskih srodnika. Iako u posve drukčijem kontekstu, ukazano je i na tradiciju primjene određenih instituta u svrhu materijalnog osiguravanja žena još od perioda klasičnog rimskog prava.
intended for academic community and all interested in higher education system in Bosnia and
Herzegovina. The article is limited to the normative and institutional analysis of legal issues in
the higher education system in Canton Sarajevo, focusing on the challenges and perspectives of
the current reform. Issues regarding the organization, academic autonomy and academic selfgovernance
are specially analyzed.
The new normative framework for higher education represents a major challenge for the
government. The views of the government and university representatives are very different. For
the cantonal government, as a promoter, the new law introduces new positive and reformative
measures, such as financial integration and improvement of quality of the education process.
The Academic Community believes that this Law is contrary to the B&H Framework Law on
Higher Education and that it derogates principles of academic autonomy, academic selfgovernance
and academic freedom.
In the article special attention is directed to University of Sarajevo, as the oldest and largest
institution of higher education in Bosnia and Herzegovina, whose position, organization and
functioning is the backbone of the proposed law.
U izdanju Pravnog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Zagrebu nedavno je objavljena znanstvena monografija Izbori i izborna korupcija u Rimskoj Republici autorice Ivane Jaramaz Reskušić, redovite profesorice na Katedri za rimsko pravo, koja ovom monografijom nastavlja svoju dosljednost u istraživanju javnopravnih aspekata funkcioniranja rimske države, koji su u hrvatskoj, ali i regionalnoj romanističkoj znanosti, uglavnom bili zapostavljeni. Monografija je podijeljena na četiri poglavlja i zaključak, nakon čega slijede latinska vrela s paralelnim prijevodom na hrvatski jezik.
Tekst je prikaz knjige N. Kovačić, Tijelo kao dokaz. Medicinska vještačenja u postupcima Kaznenog suda u Dubrovniku u 18. stoljeću, Hrvatska akademija znanosti i umjetnosti - Odjel za povijesne znanosti u Dubrovniku, Zagreb – Dubrovnik, str. 240
B. Eckhardt: Oxford University Press, 2020, xii + 526 str.
Predstavlja prilog čitanju Zbornika znanstveno - popularnog tipa koji je kroz tri tematske cjeline ukoričio radove priređene od strane kolega, suradnika i prijatelja prof. Karčića.
Dubrovnik, 2011, 711 str.). Uvidjevši kako u bh. akademskim i intelektualnim krugovima nije došlo do prodora, najnovijih, najsveobuhvatnijih, a vjerojatno i najobjektivnijih, znanstveno utemeljenih istraţivanja o pokretu Srba katolika u Dubrovniku, odlučio sam napisati nekoliko rijeĉi o knjizi svog sugrađanina, gospara Nikole Tolje.
Medieval Mediterranean countries formed their legal system in a specific form of legal culture – ius commune. Dubrovnik law was formed in that context because of trade progress, maritime and diplomatic ties. An important element was Canon Law, whose legal gaps were complemented by the Roman Law. Looking at the process of a legal system formation, we can find the answers on dilemmas about the process and the elements of law development. Many lawyers who received the legal formation at prestigeous Italian universities played an important role in the development of Dubrovnik legal culture.
Voditelj Akademije doc. dr. sc. Damir Banović.
- Jesu li pravo i pravda istovjetni pojmovi? Što su to Dubrovčani "prepisali" iz rimskog prava? Kako ga je dojmio papa Franjo? Što za njega znači sloboda, toliko istican ideal naših starih?"
Općepoznato je kako je konstantna težnja i istinska borba za očuvanje političke slobode, u pravilu pod zaštitom snažnijih država, predstavljala jedan od temelja razvoja dubrovačke komune, kasnije Republike. Na taj politički ideal podsjeća zapis na tvrđavi Lovrijenac – Non bene pro toto libertas venditur auro. Ipak, osim što je politički ideal, sloboda predstavlja važan pravni koncept, koji garantira pojedincu metafizičko izražavanje slobodne volje, što je izrazito značajno u procesu uređenja međuljudskih odnosa, odnosno određivanja oblika i sadržaja pravâ.
Imajući u vidu prigodno obilježavanje 750 godina od donošenja Dubrovačkog statuta, kao temeljnog pravnog akta dubrovačkog pravnog poretka, u fokusu predavanja bit će poredak i značaj Statuta, te sloboda kao pravni koncept. Na kraju, predavač će ukazati na činjenicu kako je Statut izgradnjom čvrstog i stabilnog pravnog sustava, opet dovoljno elastičnog za izazove koje je pred njega stavljalo vrijeme, postavio temelje društvenog i gospodarskog razvoja, odnosno svega onoga što je Dubrovnik ostvario kroz svoju slavnu povijest.
Applicando il metodo comparativo, possiamo concludere che nello sviluppo del diritto privato europeo, sia stata presente la ricezione di entrambi concetti. Nel corso del tempo il concetto di simultaneità avrebbe soppresso quasi completamente il concetto di sopravvivenza.
Questo articolo analizza le cause di questo sviluppo. Nello stabilire un legame tra le radici romane e il diritto privato europeo contemporaneo, l'attenzione particolare viene dedicata alla possibilità di applicazione delle presunzioni nei casi in cui le persone non sono morte allo stesso posto o nello stesso momento o quando sono morti per cause diverse.
Alla fine, l'articolo sottolinea l'importanza delle norme romane, che talvolta possono essere fondamentali per comprendere gli istituti del diritto privato contemporaneo.
Oslobodjenje, 3. i 4. 7. 2021. godine