International Journal of
Learning and Teaching
Volume 12, Issue 4, (2020) 184-188
www.ij-lt.eu
Short paper: What kind of culture should teaching assistants be
familiar with? Implications for bilingual schools in Spain
Jesus Garcia Laborda*, Franklin Institute – Facultad de Educación, Universidad de Alcalá, Guadalajara-19001,
Spain https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0125-4611
Iulia Vecan, Franklin Institute—Universidad de Alcala, Plaza de San Diego, s/n, 28801 Alcalá de Henares, Spain
Angela Sauciuc, Franklin Institute—Universidad de Alcala, Plaza de San Diego, s/n, 28801 Alcalá de Henares,
Spain
Suggested Citation:
Laborda, J. G., Vecan, I.&Sauciuc, A. (2020). Short paper: what kind of culture should teaching assistants be familiar
with? Implications for bilingual schools in Spain. International Journal of Learning and Teaching. 12(4), 184–188.
https://doi.org/10.18844/ijlt.v12i4.4854
Received May 24, 2020; revised August 13, 2020; accepted October 15, 2020.
Selection and peer review under responsibility of Prof. Dr. Cetin Bektas, Gaziosmanpasa University, Turkey.
©
2020 Birlesik Dunya Yenilik Arastirma ve Yayincilik Merkezi. All rights reserved.
Abstract
Language assistants have become an important resource for teachers in bilingual schools in Spain, especially in the Madrid
region. Most language assistants come from English-speaking countries, especially from the United States. In their role as
language assistants, they are expected to bring and share their knowledge about cultural aspects and content subjects and,
at the same time, they need to share their beliefs and perspectives towards Spain and Spanish schools. Nevertheless, there is
sometimes controversy around this topic as there are obvious differences and similarities between both cultures: one of
them being the misconception regarding the type of culture that needs to be taught to students.
Keywords: Language assistants, culture, English teaching, beliefs.
* ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE: Prof. Dr. Dr. Jesús García Laborda, Franklin Institute – Facultad de Educación,
Universidad de Alcalá, Guadalajara-19001, Spain
E-mail address: jesus.garcoaialaborda@uah.es / Tel.: +34-949 20 97 36
Laborda, J. G., Vecan, I.&Sauciuc, A. (2020). Short paper: what kind of culture should teaching assistants be familiar with? Implications for
bilingual schools in Spain. International Journal of Learning and Teaching. 12(4), 184–188. https://doi.org/10.18844/ijlt.v12i4.4854
1. Context
Spain has increasingly paid attention to multilingual education in recent years (Breton & Ruiz, 2008;
Cenoz, 2008; Fortanet-Gomez, 2012; Gorter & Cenoz, 2017; Moore, 2016; Perez-Milans & PatinoSantos, 2014). In the region of Madrid, the Ministry of Education and the Consejeria de Educacion
(Regional Ministry of Education of Madrid) have implemented the bilingual programme in public
bilingual schools in 2004. One of the main requirements for public bilingual schools is to have native
English speakers as language assistants (Order 162/2011, January 31). Moreover, in 2008, this
requirement was extended to the charter and private schools (Order 9,932/2012, August 30).
As stated in the yearly report published by the local government of Madrid in June 2018, the
number of bilingual or semi-bilingual schools has increased dramatically since 1995. During the
academic year of 2018–2019, the total number of students enrolled in bilingual schools in Madrid was
around 120,000 students (Figure 1). Since the academic year 2004–5 the bilingual programme has
increased the number of participant schools from 26 schools to over 379 schools and 166 high schools
as shown in Figure 1. Additionally, a total number of 218 charter schools have joined the bilingual
programme in the region of Madrid during the last years.
Figure 1. source https://www.comunidad.madrid/sites/default/files/doc/educacion/sgea_eval_informe_
programabilingue.pdf
As stated on the Ministry of Education’s website and in agreement with the European policies and
regulations(EU Council), the main goals of the bilingual programme are, on the one side, to improve
the communicative skills of students in schools and, on the other side, to provide cultural references
related to English-speaking countries through contact with English language native speakers by
implementing mobility programmes for teachers and students (Vitalaru & Vescan, 2017).
As described on the Ministry of Education’s website, language assistants represent a fundamental
element within the bilingual programme. They are usually young graduates from English-speaking
countries who bestow their cultural and linguistic values and complement the lead teacher’s work in
the classroom. Likewise, the number of language assistants had steadily increased (Figure 2) to around
1,400 in 2014.
2. Teaching culture
According to the Guide of the Language Assistant 2018–19 published by the Ministry of Education,
the functions of the language assistant include to reinforce the oral skills of the students in the foreign
185
Laborda, J. G., Vecan, I.&Sauciuc, A. (2020). Short paper: what kind of culture should teaching assistants be familiar with? Implications for
bilingual schools in Spain. International Journal of Learning and Teaching. 12(4), 184–188. https://doi.org/10.18844/ijlt.v12i4.4854
language and to foster students’ interest in the language, culture and civilisation of their country of
origin. It is also specifically mentioned that the language assistant can be assigned the following tasks
under the coordination and supervision of the teacher: specific conversation activities and teaching of
the culture and civilisation of their country.
Figure 2. Evolution of the amount of language assistants in public bilingual schools from the public bilingual
schools, course year: 2004–2005 and 2013–2014. https://comunidadbilingue.educa2.madrid.org/
aux.conversacion/-/visor/auxiliares-de-conversacion?p_p_col_pos=1
The regional Ministry of Education of Madrid includes, among the functions of the language
assistant, the ‘fostering of students’ interest in the language, culture and civilisation of the assistant’s
country of origin, as well as the cultural exchange’ (Guide of the Language Assistant, 2018–19:
https://sede.educacion.gob.es/publiventa/language-assistants-guide-language-assistants-in-spain2018-19/ensenanza-lengua-espanola/22527).The role of the assistant as a ‘cultural ambassador’ has
been mentioned in various editions of the Language Assistant Handbook throughout the years. Studies
have shown that Spanish lead teachers generally disregard the assistants’ potential ability to help
students acquire the necessary skills to deal with intercultural situations (Sercu et al., 2004). However,
the presence of a language assistant in the classroom pursues a cultural objective and can bring
students and teachers closer to the culture of the target language country. As a matter of fact, the
regional Ministry of Education assures that having a native assistant in the foreign language classroom
constitutes ‘an extraordinary opportunity for the students and the educational community in general’
(Language Assistants in Spain)
3. What culture are they expected to teach?
One of the main aims of incorporating culture in the foreign language classroom is for students to
be able to reflect on their own culture in relation to others while they acquire knowledge about the
target language (Brdaric, 2016). Language assistants thus not only promote the acquisition of language
skills, but also of intercultural competence. As mentioned by Brdaric (2016) ‘Teaching culture should
be an essential part of teaching English as a foreign language because one of its main aims is
intercultural communicative competence, which refers to knowledge of social groups and their
practices and customs’.
Having a language assistant in the classroom provides the opportunity to get a closer perspective of
cultural practices and customs from English-speaking countries. The idea being native language
assistants not only provide extra help in the classroom, but also provide culture and their experiences
in their country of origin to show to teachers and students. Their role as ‘language ambassadors’ is
186
Laborda, J. G., Vecan, I.&Sauciuc, A. (2020). Short paper: what kind of culture should teaching assistants be familiar with? Implications for
bilingual schools in Spain. International Journal of Learning and Teaching. 12(4), 184–188. https://doi.org/10.18844/ijlt.v12i4.4854
highlighted by the Ministry of Education in their job description. Brdaric (2016) also states that a
deeper understanding of people’s beliefs and way of living should also be included in ESL classrooms
rather than just focusing on important writers, artists, cities, etc. She reinforces this idea by using
Claire Kramsch’s classification of cultural content as highbrow and lowbrow information. According to
Kramsch’s classification, when concentrating on highbrow culture, language assistants would be
focusing more on expanding student’s knowledge about to literature, arts and similar aspects, while
when concentrating on lowbrow culture, language assistants would be focusing on customs of
everyday life, habits and folklore (Kramsch, 1993). She also states that when focusing on highbrow
culture, learners would be memorising information and facts rather than understanding cultural traits.
The emphasis on lowbrow culture aspects would provide learners the opportunity to connect their
own culture with the target culture.
A study carried out by Sercu et al. (2004) examined the most common cultural topics addressed in
the foreign language classroom: ‘[d]aily life and routines, living conditions, food and drink, etc.’,
‘[y]outh culture’ and ‘[t]raditions, folklore, tourist attractions’ led the ranking list. There are, however,
a number of other topics which could engage students in an interactive discussion highlighting the
differences and similarities of both cultures (their own and the target culture). Since cultures vary in
the way they view and deal with certain issues, some of these topics can be controversial. It is,
therefore, essential to create a ‘culture-friendly’ atmosphere that allows the language assistant to be
‘sensitive to the fragility of students’ and promotes cultural understanding (Brdaric, 2016).
Regarding the type of tasks or activities that they perform in the bilingual classroom, language
assistants tend to perform more engaging and interactive activities than what students are used to in
the foreign language classroom. Teachers generally work with textbooks and grammar, while language
assistants dedicate more time to activities such as role-plays, comics or songs (Scobling, 2011). In that
way, students discover the target culture through these activities. However, it is important to examine
the aspects of the target culture that are frequently addressed by language assistants and that
increase students’ motivation to participate and keep studying the foreign language and culture in the
future (Scobling, 2011).
Despite their previous knowledge of the country, each assistant brings different beliefs of the reality
they will find in and out of the school. Their beliefs clearly modify their role and participation in the
schools (Amaki, 2008). Amaki also states that, in his study in Japan, many language assistants
considered that the language competence of their Japanese colleagues was too low, and thus, they
used Japanese in many occasions even in more than necessary. A few years later, Macaro, Nakatani,
Hayashi and Khabbazbashi (2014) did a small-scale exploratory study on the use of bilingual EFL
monolingual and bilingual language assistants. Obviously, monolingual assistants only performed in
English, while bilingual used mostly English and also used Japanese for clarifying purposes. The results
indicated that groups with bilingual assistants had greater gains over a period of 3months. More recent
studies have addressed different issues in 2017, Uzum describes the case of an Uzbek assistant in the
US who used a language socialisation theoretical framework. Uzum found out that ‘biographical factors
(e.g., the teacher’s personal history, experience as a learner), contextual factors (e.g., interactions with
students and institutional resources) and dialogic factors (e.g., the teacher’s knowledge of theories of
teaching and learning) guided the process of socialisation’ (Uzum, 2017, p. 241).
The importance of training to modify or create the language assistants’ beliefs and especially their
attitudes can, in no few occasions, be due to training. For example, Soler and Tecedor (2018) studied
three main issues in teacher training towards their incorporation as language assistants in foreign
schools and universities: language, culture and technology. They stated that ‘training is based on
immediate teaching needs and lacks long-term goals of professionalisation and that there are
substantial differences in opinion between TAs and faculty in charge of the training regarding its
effectiveness’ (Soler & Tecedor, 2018: 38). This is especially significant in the Spanish context since
many assistants usually have never been in Spain before and therefore lack the personal experience of
living and working abroad.
187
Laborda, J. G., Vecan, I.&Sauciuc, A. (2020). Short paper: what kind of culture should teaching assistants be familiar with? Implications for
bilingual schools in Spain. International Journal of Learning and Teaching. 12(4), 184–188. https://doi.org/10.18844/ijlt.v12i4.4854
4. Conclusion
The importance of culture interchange between the Spanish educational stakeholders and the
language assistants is significant in bilingual education in Spain. Language assistants are to deliver
topic knowledge, but especially with regard to their way of living, thinking and understanding life.
Culture is a must in a multicultural classroom and the Government of Madrid so considers. This little
piece of writing just presented a brief approach to the topic. However, a revision of this topic is
necessary to observe the implications in the students’ understanding of the foreign culture and to see
whether enough information is transferred (Buckingham, 2018).
References
Brdaric, H. (2016). The importance of teaching culture in the foreign language classroom (Unpublished
Dissertation). University of Osijek, Osijek, Croatia. Retrieved from https://zir.nsk.hr/islandora/object/
ffos:371/datastream/PDF/download
Breton, N. O. & Ruiz, P. S. (2008). Bilingual education in navarre: achievements and challenges. Language,
Culture and Curriculum, 21(1), 21–38. doi:10.2167/lcc340.0
Buckingham, L. R. (2018). Defining the role of language assistants in the bilingual classroom. Revista Tecnologia,
Ciencia y Educacion, 9, 38–49.
Cenoz, J. (2008). Achievements and challenges in bilingual and multilingual education in the basque country.
AILA Review, 21, 13–30. doi:10.1075/aila.21.03cen
Fortanet-Gomez, I. (2012). Academics’ beliefs about language use and proficiency in Spanish multilingual higher
education. AILA Review, 25, 48–63. doi:10.1075/aila.25.04for
Gorter, D. & Cenoz, J. (2017). Language education policy and multilingual assessment. Language and Education,
31(3), 231–248. doi:10.1080/09500782.2016.1261892
Kramsch, C. J. (1993). Context and culture in language teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Macaro, E., Nakatani, Y., Hayashi, Y. & Khabbazbashi, N. (2014).Exploring the value of bilingual language
assistants with Japanese English as a foreign language learners. Language Learning Journal, 42(1), 41–54.
Moore, E. (2016). Conceptualising multilingual higher education in policies, pedagogical designs and classroom
practices. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 29(1), 22–39. doi:10.1080/07908318.2016.1132652
Perez-Milans, M. & Patino-Santos, A. (2014). Language education and institutional change in a madrid
multilingual
school.
International
Journal
of
Multilingualism,
11(4),
449–470.
doi:10.1080/14790718.2014.944532
Scobling, C. (2011). El Auxiliar de Conversacion como herramienta de motivacion en la ensenanza y aprendizaje
de lenguas extranjeras en la educacion secundaria y bachillerato. Retrieved from:
https://www.academia.edu/25115178/El_Auxiliar_de_Conversaci%C3%B3n_como
Sercu, L., Bandura, E., Castro, P., Davcheva, L., Laskaridou, C., Lundgren, U., …Ryan P. (2005). Foreign language
teachers and intercultural competence. An international investigation. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Soler, I. G. & Tecedor, M. (2018). Foreign language teaching assistant training: a contrastive analysis of trainers
and trainees’ perspectives. Hispania, 101(1), 38–54.
Uzum, B. (2017). Uncovering the layers of foreign language teacher socialization: a qualitative case study of
Fulbright language teaching assistants. Language Teaching Research, 21(2), 241–257. doi:
10.1177/1362168815614338
Vitalaru, B. & Vescan, I. (2017). Analysis of challenges in academic writing in postgraduate programs for
American language assistants in Madrid. Proceedings of the III International Colloquium Language,
Culture, Identity in School and Society (Perspectives and culture in Master’s theses). F. Ramos. Ed. Soria,
Spain: University of Soria. pp 25–37. Web. 8 August 2018. Retrieved from
http://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/internationalcolloquium/2/
188