Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
…
7 pages
1 file
Extreme weather events combined with developments in meteorology and climatology to create a canvas of interpretive possibilities for 19th-century British writers to frame ethical and ecological critiques of industrial modernity. Literary texts helped shape a new understanding of Britain's climate as globally interconnected and increasingly driven, and possibly imperiled, by human activity.
Ecozon@ - European Journal of Literature, Culture, and the Environment, 2020
Journal for Early Modern Cultural Studies, 2008
The Great Storm of November 26-27, 1703, that struck Southern England and Wales became a benchmark throughout the eighteenth century for the destructive potential of Nature. This article examines Daniel Defoe's 1704 text The Storm, a compilation of reports of damage from across England that Defoe prefaced with a long introductory essay about his own experiences and speculations about the causes of the disaster. Defoe and his correspondents offer important analyses of the relations among humankind, landscape, and climate, even as they set their remarks in the context of eighteenth-century theology. Ultimately, The Storm seeks to reconcile its scientific and religious impulses by resorting to an eco-cultural materialism that emphasizes the complex feedback loops between landscape, climate, and human activities. X T he Great Storm of November 26-27, 1703, that struck Southern England and Wales became a benchmark throughout the eighteenth century for the destructive power of Nature directed by a chastising God. 1 Preaching on the thirtieth anniversary of the storm, Andrew Gifford called it "the most terrible Desolation of [its] kind that ever was known in the Memory of Man, or recorded in any History" (24). Survivors observed memorial days of prayer and fasting on the anniversary of the storm, and annual sermons to commemorate the dead continued well into the nineteenth century-reiterating the theological commonplace that "the tempest" was evidence of God's "great and terrible Judgment" and a forewarning to sinners that "the desolations which have been made in the earth" presaged the Day of Judgment (Stinton, Sermon 5; Pritchard, Desolations 28). In crucial markley X 103 ways, all of these sermons are indebted to, and often draw explicitly on, Daniel Defoe's The Storm: Or, a Collection of the Most Remarkable Casualties and Disasters Which Happen'd in the Late Dreadful Tempest Both by Sea and Land (1704), a unique compilation of eyewitness accounts that Defoe advertised for, assembled, and prefaced with a long essay describing his own experiences and reporting the tolls of destruction and death from across Britain. Published in two editions, The Storm remains a vital source of information for climatologists and historians; by marshalling the resources of early eighteenth-century print culture-the periodical advertisement and correspondents' letters-Defoe summarizes what statistics he could find and provides often striking vignettes of the destruction that occurred on November 27. His commitment to empirical verification reflects his solid understanding of the protocols of natural philosophy at the turn of the eighteenth century. "We have endeavour'd to furnish our selves with the most authentick Accounts we could from all Parts of the Nation," Defoe told his readers, and assured them that "a great many worthy Gentleman have contributed their Assistance in various, and some very exact Relations and curious Remarks" (69). In confronting the effects of this and other storms that ravaged England in the early eighteenth century, these "very exact Relations" superimpose empirical and theological interpretations: Defoe and his contributors justify their efforts to understand the physical forces that led to the "casualties and disasters" of 1703 with typological readings of their causes. In the process, The Storm reveals the complex ways in which our understanding of climate-in the twenty-first century as well as the eighteenth-both shapes and is shaped by a range of ecological, socioeconomic, and metaphysical values and assumptions. Although hardly one of Defoe's most popular works, The Storm is a historically significant effort to register the "exact" and "curious" perceptions of the unsettled weather that characterized the early modern period. In its emphasis on eyewitness reports, the "virtual witnessing" that characterizes emerging notions of scientific methodology, his text describes some of the ways in which conditions during the Little Ice Age (c. 1350-1850)-a period of shorter springs and growing seasons, longer winters, and often abrupt and violent shifts in weather patterns-shaped larger perceptions of "Nature" itself. 2 In the first section of this article, I explore the problems of representing the storm in 1703 and reconstructing its causes and effects three hundred years later by using cutting-edge climatological models. If the survivors, including Defoe himself, repeatedly maintain that no description
Modernist Cultures, 2021
Prompted by Wyndham Lewis's call in BLAST for a ‘USEFUL LITTLE CHEMIST’ to ‘restore to us the necessary BLIZZARDS’, this paper considers the conceptions of climate and climatic change – natural and anthropogenic – that were in circulation in the early twentieth century. Engaging with the writing of scientists, journalists, novelists, and avant-garde polemicists, it examines early twentieth-century iterations of the notion that climate determines culture, the period's awareness of past climatic changes, the theories advanced to explain these changes, and the attitudes taken towards the possibility of human-induced climatic change.
AQCL/ACQL (Association for Canadian and Québec Literatures/Association des littératures canadienne et québécoise), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, 2019
2011
Articulated initially by physical scientists, the idea of anthropogenic global climate change has been subject to increasingly diverse examinations in recent years. The idea has been appropriated by economists, worked with by engineers and, more recently, scrutinised by social scientists and humanities scholars. Underlying these examinations are different, yet rarely exposed, presumptions about what kind of ‘thing’ climate is: a physical abstraction, a statistical construct, an imaginative idea. If the ontological status of climate is rarely made explicit it becomes difficult to know whether the different epistemologies used to reveal climates – and their changing properties – are appropriate. This study offers one way in which the different worlds inhabited by the idea of climate may be revealed. It does so by examining a heatwave: a powerful meteorological phenomenon one would think and one which scientific accounts of climate change tell us will become more frequent in the future. The heatwave in question occurred in July 1900 in the county of Norfolk, England. This heatwave inhabits three very different worlds: the imaginative world of L P Hartley in his novel The Go Between; the historical world of late Victorian Norfolk; and the digital world of the climate sciences. The traces of the heatwave left in these different worlds are varied and access to them is uneven. Constructing an adequate interpretation of this singular climatic event and its meaning is challenging. The study suggests that grasping the idea of climate may be harder than we think. Climates may be ineffable. Yet the approach to the study of climate illustrated here opens up new ways of thinking about the meaning and significance of climate change.
British Romanticism, Climate Change, and the Anthropocene, 2017
The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
Strange weather is one of the growing ways human beings experience climate change phenomenologically or beyond abstract scientific data. Even those who do not “believe” in climate change experience it. Odd weather is also one of first things human beings talk about with one another or share, today and at least since the great flood in the Epic of Gilgamesh. This article considers how increasingly violent weather is ushering in a new type of narrative and art and announcing a new political and climatic regime. It considers a series of contemporary works of art about strange weather as a more precise example or microcosm of a certain reinvention of epic in our time. It then considers how this shared narrative of violent weather is intruding on, disrupting, and reconfiguring our political systems at the same time as it is collectivizing, historicizing, and politicizing the public before the growing threat of climate change.
In this paper I argue that an adequate response to climate change requires an overcoming of the metaphysics of presence that is structuring our relationship with the weather. I trace the links between this metaphysics and the dominant way that the topic of climate change is being narrated, which is structured around the transition from diagnosis to cure, from the scientific reading to the technological writing of the weather. Against this narrative I develop a rather different account of the current ecopolitical moment. I first argue that an understanding of anthropogenic climate change must be grounded in a biosemiotic analysis of the evolving metabolism between society and nature, one that is alert to the way that metabolism involves a folded relation between inside and outside, and that recognises the constant deferral of biosemiotic meaning in ecological systems. I then use a deconstructive reading of climate technics to problematise the distinction between the diagnosis and solution of climate change, and expose modern scientific practices of reading the climate as already containing within themselves a notion of weather’s technological writability. Exploring the notion that previous transformations of the metabolic regime of society have always involved transformations of notions of the human, I conclude by sketching out a different way of reading and writing the weather, one that takes place in the ‘opening’ of climate change, that problematises the idea of the human as the end of nature, and that thereby implies a more radical version of climate responsibility.
Extrapolation, 2018
The paper argues that contemporary climate fiction is a subgenre of sf rather than a distinct and separate genre for two main reasons: first, because its texts and practitioners relate primarily to the sf "selective tradition"; and, second, because its texts and practitioners articulate a "structure of feeling" that accords centrality to science and technology, in this case normally climate science. Not only is "cli-fi" best understood as sf, it also has a much longer history than is commonly allowed, one that arguably stretches back to antiquity. The paper distinguishes between texts in which extreme climate change is represented as anthropogenic and those where it is represented as theogenic, geogenic, or xenogenic; it also provides a brief sketch of the (pre-)history of stories of anthropogenic, xenogenic, and geogenic extreme climate change.
B. Isaksson - M. Persson (edd.), Strategies of clause linking in Semitic languages: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Clause Linking in Semitic Languages, Kivik, Sweden, 5-7 August 2012, 91-108., 2014
Nature Nanotechnology, 2009
Review of European and Comparative Law, 2023
HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe), 1995
Filozofska Istraživanja, 2014
Revista Scripta, 2023
Value in Health, 2003
Japanese Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology , 2022
Integrative cancer therapies, 2015
Pathology & Oncology Research, 2020
Proc. Int. Workshop on Coding Techniques for Very Low Bit-Rate Video, 2010
Polish Archaeology in the Mediterranean, 2021
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2021