Road Safety Audit

Road Saf et y Audit : CR 638 (Valley Street), Millburn Avenue to South Orange Avenue Maplewood & South Orange Township, Essex County APRIL 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................... iii I. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 1 Site Selection ..................................................................................................................................... 1 What is a Road Safety Audit? ............................................................................................................ 1 The Valley Street RSA Event .............................................................................................................. 2 II. Corridor Description and Analysis......................................................................................................... 2 Study Location................................................................................................................................... 2 Roadway and Intersection Characteristics........................................................................................ 2 Existing and Proposed Bicycle/Pedestrian Accommodations ........................................................... 2 Traffic Volumes ................................................................................................................................. 3 Transit Service ................................................................................................................................... 3 Community Profile ............................................................................................................................ 3 Redevelopment ................................................................................................................................. 3 III. Crash Findings ................................................................................................................................... 4 Temporal Trends ............................................................................................................................... 4 Collision Types................................................................................................................................... 5 Severity ............................................................................................................................................. 6 Roadway Surface & Light Condition.................................................................................................. 7 Location ............................................................................................................................................. 8 IV. Identified Issues ................................................................................................................................ 9 V. Findings and Recommendations ......................................................................................................... 13 Recommendations .......................................................................................................................... 13 Road Owner Response .................................................................................................................... 22 Recommendation Visualizations ..................................................................................................... 23 VI. Conclusions ..................................................................................................................................... 27 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 – Total Crashes by Month and Day of Week ................................................................................... 4 Figure 2 – Pedestrian/Bicyclist Crashes by Month and Day of Week ........................................................... 5 Figure 3 – Crash Type Breakdown................................................................................................................. 6 Figure 4 – Severity (All Crashes).................................................................................................................... 6 Figure 5 – Severity (Pedestrian/Bicycle Crashes) .......................................................................................... 7 Figure 6 – Surface Conditions (All Crashes) .................................................................................................. 7 Figure 7 – Light Conditions (All Crashes)....................................................................................................... 8 Figure 8 – Light Condition (Pedestrian/Bicycle Crashes) .............................................................................. 8 Figure 9 – Total Crash Locations (2014-2016) .............................................................................................. 9 Figure 10 – Pedestrian Crash Locations (2012-2016) ................................................................................... 9 Figure 11 – Pedestrian Facility Examples .................................................................................................... 23 Valley St reet (CR 638) Road Saf et y Audit i Figure 12 – Recommendation at South Crescent. Left: Crossing Island. Right: Curb Extension. ............... 24 Figure 13 – Parklet Example (Source: NACTO)............................................................................................ 24 Figure 14 – Bicycle Facility Examples .......................................................................................................... 25 Figure 15 – Conceptual Cross Sections based on Recommendations (Maplewood).................................. 25 Figure 16 – Conceptual Cross Sections based on Recommendations (South Orange) ............................... 26 Figure 17 – Example of Bus Pull-Out Stop & Bulb Stop (alternative use of curbside) ................................ 26 Figure 18 – Roundabout Example (Source: CSDG)...................................................................................... 27 LIST OF TABLES Table 1 – Valley Street NJTPA FY 2017-18 LSP Ranking ................................................................................ 1 Table 2 – Valley Street Area Demographics .................................................................................................. 3 Table 3 – Overrepresented Crash Types ....................................................................................................... 5 Table 4 – Corridor-Wide Recommendations .............................................................................................. 14 Table 5 – Site-Specific Recommendations .................................................................................................. 15 APPENDICES A. RSA Team B. Area Map C. Traffic Data D. Vehicular Crash Diagrams E. Pedestrian Crash Diagrams F. Photographs G. Straight Line Diagrams H. Pre-Audit Presentation I. Maplewood Project Information J. South Orange Village Project Information K. Road Owner Response: Essex County Valley St reet (CR 638) Road Saf et y Audit ii Execut ive Summary This document is the final report of the CR 638, Valley Street Road Safety Audit (RSA). It was conducted from the Millburn Avenue intersection in Maplewood Township (MP 0.08) to the South Orange Avenue intersection in the Township of South Orange Village (MP 2.22), Essex County. An RSA is an effective way of identifying crash-causing trends and appropriate countermeasures utilizing a nontraditional approach that promotes transportation safety while maintaining mobility. This section of CR 638, Valley Street was identified on NJTPA’s Local Safety Program Network Screening list as a high priority location. According to the NJDOT crash database, 202 crashes occurred during the three-year period between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2016, along the study area section of CR 638, Valley Street with 82, 64, and 56 crashes occurring in 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively. Additionally, 16 pedestrian crashes occurred over the five-year period between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2016, one of which was fatal. This one-day RSA was conducted on Thursday, October 26, 2017, from 8:30 am to 3:30 pm. The pre- and post-audit meetings were held in the Maplewood Township Municipal Building, 574 Valley Street, Maplewood, NJ. Representatives from NJDOT, NJTPA, Essex County, Maplewood Township, and the Township of South Orange Village were in attendance with NJDOT serving as the facilitator. The RSA site and crash history are described in Sections II and III of this report, respectively. Section II also identifies previous and on-going studies conducted by the aforementioned agency representatives. Corridor-wide and site-specific issues and recommendations, organized by location, are discussed in Section IV. The most common recommendations were to consider developing an access management and parking plan; traffic signal and ADA ramp upgrades; and investigate curb extensions at unsignalized intersections. The recommendations contained herein were developed collaboratively with the roadway owner and local stakeholders from the RSA Team (members listed in Appendix A). The study partners have expressed interest in implementing many of the recommendations as time and funds allow. Many of the maintenance items, which are typically low cost, can be addressed without additional engineering. Please note this RSA report does not constitute an engineering report. The agency responsible for design and construction should consult a licensed professional engineer in preparing the design and construction documents, to implement any of the safety countermeasures mentioned in this report. Valley St reet (CR 638) Road Saf et y Audit iii I. Int roduct ion Sit e Select ion The section of CR 638, Valley Street (herein referred to as Valley Street), from Millburn Avenue to South Orange Avenue (MP 0.08-2.22), was identified on NJTPA’s Local Safety Program Network Screening list as a high priority location, as shown in the below FY 2017-2018 ranking. Of note, these rankings are based on 2011-2013 vehicular and 2009-2013 pedestrian crash data. Table 1 – Valley Street NJTPA FY 2017-18 LSP Ranking Regional Corridors Intersections Pedestrian Intersections #County Rank/NJTPA Region Rank #50/199 S Orange Ave #77/318 Valley St (MP 0.08-1.08) #155/839 Valley St (MP 1.15-2.15) #248/1472 Valley St (MP 1.15-2.15) #71/291 S Orange Ave #114/508 2nd St #237/1019 Baker St #450/1938 Parker Ave #467/2012 S Pierson Rd #511/2245 Millburn Ave #511/2245 Oakland Rd #49/126 Roland Ave #83/233 S Orange Ave #300/897 3rd St #523/1683 Tuscan Rd #557/1893 1st St What is a Road Saf et y Audit ? A Road Safety Audit (RSA) is a formal safety performance examination of an existing or future road or intersection by a multi-disciplinary audit team independent of the project. RSAs can be used on any size project, from minor maintenance to mega-projects, and can be conducted on facilities with a history of crashes, or during the design phase of a new roadway or planned upgrade. RSAs consider all road users, account for human factors and road user capabilities, are documented in a formal report, and require a formal response from the road owner. The RSA program is conducted to generate improvement recommendations and countermeasures for roadway segments demonstrating a history of, or potential for, a high frequency of crashes, or an identifiable pattern of crash types. Recommendations range from low-cost, quick-turnaround safety improvements to more complex strategies. Implementation of improvement strategies identified through this process may be eligible for Local Federal Aid Safety Funds. Because the RSA process is adaptable to local needs and conditions, recommendations can be implemented incrementally as time and resources permit. The RSA process, one of FHWAs proven safety countermeasures, is shown in the figure below. Valley St reet (CR 638) Road Saf et y Audit 1 The Valley St reet RSA Event This one-day RSA was conducted on Thursday, October 26, 2017, from 8:30 am to 3:00 pm. The preand post-audit meetings were held in the Maplewood Township Municipal Building, 574 Valley Street, Maplewood, NJ. Representatives from NJDOT, NJTPA, Maplewood Township, Township of South Orange Village, and Essex County were in attendance with NJDOT serving as the facilitator. A list of team members can be found in Appendix A. II. Corridor Descript ion and Analysis St udy Locat ion The study area consists of approximately 2.1 miles of Valley Street from the Millburn Avenue intersection to the South Orange Avenue intersection. The area lies within Maplewood Township and the Township of South Orange Village, Essex County. This stretch of Valley Street is a mix of commercial, residential, and recreational properties. Commercial sites consist of one- and two-story retail and service establishments; and a grocery store-anchored shopping plaza. Residential units consist of detached single-family homes and apartment complexes. Recreational areas consist of parks, ballfields, and a private golf course. The northern portion of Valley Street is within the South Orange Village Center Special Improvement District (SID). Nearby Maplewood Village is also a SID. Roadway and Int ersect ion Charact erist ics Valley Street is classified as an urban minor arterial and runs in a southwest to northeast orientation. The corridor study section is two-lanes, undivided, with a posted speed limit of 25mph, and onstreet parking where designated. There are seven (7) signalized intersections, twenty-seven (27) unsignalized intersections and multiple driveways along this section. Exist ing and Proposed Bicycle/ Pedest rian Accommodat ions Sidewalks are consistently available throughout the study area. Sidewalk conditions vary from newly installed to needing maintenance. Crosswalk striping is a mix of continental, zebra or standard-style with the crosswalks in South Orange also including brick pavers within the standard white lines. At unsignalized intersections, crosswalks are provided to cross the side streets, however, crosswalks traversing Valley Street are sparse. Tuscan Road, Baker Street and Parker Avenue are official school crossings with crossing guards during the morning and afternoon peak pedestrian hours. A bus shelter was noted at 1st Street and bus stops were observed throughout the corridor. There are no defined bicycle lanes along Valley Street, therefore bicyclists were observed riding on the roadway as well as the sidewalks. The Maplewood Bikeway Network includes a small portion of Valley Street between Pierson Road and Park Avenue. Bike routes were also recommended along South Crescent and Oakland Road, and Ridgewood Road, which cross and parallel Valley Street, respectively. According to the South Orange Bicycling Network, routes are proposed on 2nd and 3rd Street, which cross the northern portion of Valley Street, and Academy Street and Walton Avenue, which run parallel to Valley Street. Additionally, both Township networks include Prospect Street and Wyoming Avenue. The majority of these bike routes are considered share lane roadways. Valley St reet (CR 638) Road Saf et y Audit 2 Traf f ic Volumes Based on available data, the ADT along Valley Street ranges from approximately 15,800 to 18,600 in the northern and southern portions of the study area, respectively. A copy of the available data can be found in Appendix C. Transit Service NJ Transit provides bus and rail services along or near this route. NJ Transit owns and operates two stations within a couple blocks of Valley Street, on either end of the project corridor: the Maplewood Station and the South Orange Station. Both stations are serviced by the Morristown Line and the Gladstone Branch trains which runs parallel to Valley Street. NJ Transit also provides bus service along the corridor with one bus shelter at the corner of Valley Street and 1st Street in the Township of South Orange Village and additional stops along Valley Street within South Orange and Maplewood Township. Jitney shuttles also service this area with a bus stop at the corner of Valley Street and 5th Street. Communit y Prof ile Population and income characteristics from the 2010 Census (U.S. Census Bureau) were used to identify minority populations and low-income populations. Updates to the 2010 Census were performed by the Census Bureau through the American Community Survey (ACS) estimate. The latest ACS for this study area is a five-year estimate from 2011 through 2015. A summary of the demographics is listed below. Table 2 – Valley Street Area Demographics Characteristic Poverty Minority Black or African American Hispanic/Latino Limited English Proficiency (LEP) Valley St Area County Average 7.0% 17.3% 13.9% 39.9% 6.6% 21.7% 14.9% 9.8% In addition, approximately 32.1% of the population use public transportation, compared to the County average of 20.6%. Redevelopment The March 2006 South Orange Village Redevelopment/Rehabilitation Study found that the entire study area of Valley Street, extending from South Orange Avenue to the municipal border with Maplewood (Hixon Place), meets the “Rehabilitation Area” criteria and part of the area meets the “in Need of Redevelopment” criteria, as defined by the Local Redevelopment and Housing Law (LRHL). Consequently, many properties along this corridor are currently, or are anticipated to be, redeveloped to include more mixed-use, multi-story buildings with first-floor retail and upper floor residential units in addition to multi-family residential complexes. One example is the proposed 5story, mixed-use building proposed in the southwest quadrant of the Valley Street and 4th Street intersection. South Orange Vision focuses on environmentally and fiscally sustainable development. This will be achieved through the formation of cultural destinations and public spaces within a downtown Valley St reet (CR 638) Road Saf et y Audit 3 district; the integration of affordable housing within the current housing market; and by designing walkable neighborhoods and implementing shared routes practices throughout the corridor. As aforementioned, Valley Street is part of the South Orange Village Center Special Improvement District (SID). Maplewood Village is also a SID; however, private redevelopment plans within the project limits are currently unknown. III. Crash Findings The analysis used in the RSA was based on reportable crashes that resulted in a fatality, injury and/or property damage as found in the NJDOT crash database. Corridor-wide crash characteristics and overrepresentations were compared to the 2016 statewide average for the county road system as further detailed below. All crashes were plotted onto a collision diagram, which can be found in Appendix D. Temporal Trends According to the NJDOT crash database, there were 202 crashes from 2014 to 2016 along the study area section of Valley Street with 82, 64, and 56 crashes occurring in 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively. Total crashes were highest in May and lowest in August compared to the county average. The day of week trend was similar to the county averages. Additionally, 16 pedestrian crashes occurred over the five-year period from 2012 to 2016. The majority of these crashes included minor injuries and occurred during the day, on Wednesdays, and in May and November. It should be noted that the low number of crashes compared to the county road system may be statistically insignificant since they could not be correlated with an identified event. For example, while the monthly chart indicates 31% of pedestrian crashes occurred on Wednesday, this equates to a total of 5 crashes versus the county average of 126 crashes (17%) for the same day. Month 14% Day of Week 25% 13% 12% 10% 10% 10% 9% 8% 6% 6% 15% 8% 7% 6% 20% 11% 20% 10% 6% 15% 14% 16% 17% 11% 10% 4% 4% 7% December November October August September July June May April 0% March 0% February 5% January 2% 2014-2016 RSA Project Area 2014-2016 RSA Project Area 2014-2016 County Road System 2014-2016 County Road System Figure 1 – Total Crashes by Month and Day of Week Valley St reet (CR 638) Road Saf et y Audit 4 Month Day of Week 25% 35% 20% 20%20% 20% 33% 30% 25% 15% 20% 13% 15% 10% 7% 5% 7% 7% 7% 20% 13% 2012-2016 RSA December November August September July October 0% 0% June May 0% April March February January 0% 13% 7% 5% 0% 13% 10% 0% 2012-2016 County Rds 0% 2012-2016 RSA 2012-2016 County Rds Figure 2 – Pedestrian/Bicyclist Crashes by Month and Day of Week Collision Types Overrepresented crash types included same direction (rear end), struck parked vehicle, and pedestrian collisions. Geographically, the same direction rear end crashes were relatively evenly distributed throughout the corridor. However, they were most prevalent along the mainline approaches to unsignalized intersections. The availability of on-street parking within South Orange Village contributes to many parked vehicle collisions. The parked vehicle collisions were clustered in two major sections. The first section exists between Edgewood Place and Parker Avenue, along the southbound side. The second section exists between First Street and Fourth Street, in both directions. It should be noted that both sections are in high-activity areas: the first section, a school zone; the second, a central business district. Similar to the rear end collisions, the left turn collisions (no U-turn collisions occurred within the three-year sample) were evenly distributed throughout the corridor with most incidents occurring at unsignalized intersections. The collisions involving pedestrians (no cyclist collisions were reported within the five-year sample) were largely located within crosswalks, with only two of the sixteen occurring midblock. The intersection of Valley Street and Jefferson Avenue was the only location with multiple incidents, both involving pedestrians crossing Jefferson Avenue, parallel to the mainline. Table 3 – Overrepresented Crash Types Collision Type Same Direction (Rear End) Struck Parked Vehicle Left Turn/U Turn Pedestrian/Cyclist Valley St reet (CR 638) Count % of Total 96 19 9 9 Road Saf et y Audit 47.52% 8.91% 4.46% 4.46% 2016 County Road System Average 32.40% 5.89% 4.06% 2.64% 5 48% 50% 2014-2016 RSA Project Area 2014-2016 County Road System 40% 35% 32% 45% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 5% 0% 4% 2% 11% 6% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 5% 0% 0% 4% 10% 0% 2% 15% 4% 4% 12% 13% 20% 9% 6% 25% 15% 18% 30% 0% Figure 3 – Crash Type Breakdown Severit y Crashes resulting in injury were underrepresented compared to the county road system. This is likely due to the higher rates of parked vehicle collisions, which involve fewer occupants and lower speed differentials. Additionally, this corridor has a lower rate of right-angle collisions, typically the most severe type of collision, compared to the county average. The majority of crashes resulted in property damage only, while the county road system had a higher volume of minor and moderate injury crashes. One fatal crash occurred in 2013 and resulted in the death of one pedestrian who was crossing Valley Street, between Lackawanna Place and 5th Street, midblock and outside of the marked crosswalk at 5th Street. Fatal Major Injury 0% 0% 0% 0% 4% 2% Moderate Injury Minor Injury 21% 20% 74% 78% Property Damage Only 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 2014-2016 County Road System 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 2014-2016 RSA Project Area Figure 4 – Severity (All Crashes) Valley St reet (CR 638) Road Saf et y Audit 6 100% 7% 0% 90% 3% 0% 20% 80% 70% 60% 85% 40% 50% 40% 30% 20% 33% 10% 1% 10% 0% 2012-2016 RSA Project Area Property Damage Only 2012-2016 County Road System Minor Injury Moderate Injury Major Injury Fatal Figure 5 – Severity (Pedestrian/Bicycle Crashes) Roadway Surf ace & Light Condit ion Collisions occurred during dry and wet surface conditions approximately 85% and 14% of the time, respectively. These numbers are slightly over the county averages of 79% and 16%. Those differences are likely insignificant due to the minimal difference within a relatively small sample size. All other conditions are slightly underrepresented, although similar to the county averages. This data suggests that road surface is not a contributing factor to the accident rate within the corridor. Daytime collisions are overrepresented in the corridor, accounting for 79% of all collisions. The county average is 71%. Meanwhile, nighttime collisions account for 17% of all collisions, which is lower than the county average of 24%. Additionally, collisions occurring during dawn or dusk account for 4% of all collisions, the same as the county average. This suggests lighting (or lack thereof) is not a contributing factor to vehicle collisions along the corridor. 1% 0% Other Icy 2% 0% Snowy 3% 1% 16% 14% Wet 79% Dry 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 2014-2016 County Road System 50% 60% 70% 80% 85% 90% 2014-2016 RSA Project Area Figure 6 – Surface Conditions (All Crashes) Valley St reet (CR 638) Road Saf et y Audit 7 1% 0% Unknown Night 24% 17% 4% 4% Dawn/Dusk 71% Day 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 2014-2016 County Road System 60% 70% 79% 80% 90% 2014-2016 RSA Project Area Figure 7 – Light Conditions (All Crashes) In addition, approximately 13% of pedestrian crashes occurred during dawn or dusk, which is more than double the county road statewide average of 5%. 29% Dark 25% 5% Dawn/Dusk 13% 66% Daylight 63% 0% 10% 20% 30% 2012-2016 County Road System 40% 50% 60% 70% 2012-2016 RSA Project Area Figure 8 – Light Condition (Pedestrian/Bicycle Crashes) Locat ion Crashes at unsignalized intersections were overrepresented compared to the county road system average. Thirty-seven percent (37%) of crashes occurred at unsignalized intersections compared to twenty-four percent (24%) on all county roads. More crashes occurred at or near 3rd Street, Edgewood Place, South Crescent, and South Pierson Road. Crash frequency in 0.1-mile increments for the three-year period from 2014 through 2016, as shown in the following figure, shows the concentration of crashes along Valley Street. Pedestrian crash frequency for the five-year period from 2012 through 2016 immediately follows. Valley St reet (CR 638) Road Saf et y Audit 8 Edgewood Pl Figure 9 – Total Crash Locations (2014-2016) Figure 10 – Pedestrian Crash Locations (2012-2016) IV. Ident if ied Issues This section summarizes the site-specific and corridor-wide safety issues identified during the RSA. They are categorized into operations (including visibility), pedestrian, bicyclist and maintenance. Additional issues and photographs can be found in Appendix F. Pedestrian Bicyclist Pedestrian crossing midblock in traffic Lack of on-street bicycle facilities Valley St reet (CR 638) Road Saf et y Audit 9 Pedestrian Bicyclist Poor pavement conditions and obstructed sidewalks Edge of roadway pavement is inadequate for bicyclists Signals lack pedestrian signal heads Narrow, busy roadway during rush hours Marked crosswalk with no warning signs Lack of bicyclist infrastructure at intersections Valley St reet (CR 638) Road Saf et y Audit 10 Operations & Visibility Maintenance Limited sight distance and visibility at 2nd Street Broken traffic signal transformer base Limited sight distance and visibility of traffic signal Missing section of curb Back-to-back signs obscure shape of yield signs Worn signing and non-breakaway posts Valley St reet (CR 638) Road Saf et y Audit 11 Operations & Visibility Maintenance New development (recent and proposed) may generate more pedestrian and vehicular traffic Overgrown vegetation impedes full use of sidewalk Additional issues, observations and details identified during the RSA include the following, listed from south to north: Maplewood • Villa Terrace (south of Millburn Avenue) gets blocked by Valley Street northbound queues. • The 0.21-mile long stretch of Valley Street between Millburn Avenue and S. Pierson Road does not have any marked crosswalk across Valley Street. Marked crosswalks are also missing across Valley Street between Tuscan Road and S. Pierson Road (0.32 miles) and Crowell Place and Oakland Road (0.20 miles). • The Tuscan School is within a block of Valley Street, on Harvard Avenue, and many students walk to the school daily. Crossing guards are present from 7:30am to 9:00am and from 2:30pm to 4:00pm. Additionally, one lane is closed along Harvard Avenue for one hour during start of the school day. • Crossing guards are present from 7:30am to 9:00am and from 2:30pm to 4:00pm at the Baker Street intersection. • Large right turn queues along Baker Street at the Valley Street intersection extend beyond the existing turning bay, due in part to the Valley Street southbound queue extending up to the intersection. Left turning vehicles cross double yellow to pass right turning vehicles. • South Crescent is used for commuter parking after 9am. • Push buttons at the Oakview Avenue intersection were noted as failing frequently and incorrectly positioned. • Jefferson Avenue acts as a cut-through for high school and train station traffic. A traffic signal was unwarranted in a previous 2010 study conducted for Maplewood Township by GPI. South Orange Village • The 0.20-mile long stretch of Valley Street between Arnold Terrace and 5th Street does not have any marked crosswalk across Valley Street. • JITNEY/Shuttle Service is proposed near Roland Avenue for Seton Hall students at 378 Valley Street. Valley St reet (CR 638) Road Saf et y Audit 12 • The office space on the third and fourth floors of the Third & Valley mixed-use building are anticipated to be fully occupied soon, which may add additional traffic to the intersection of Valley Street and 3rd Street. 2nd Street is considered part of the bus turnaround route (2nd Street to Sloan Street to 3rd Street). Sight distance is limited for Valley Street southbound near 1st Street due to the existing bus stops. (When the bus is stopped along Valley Street northbound, southbound left turns are difficult; when the bus is stopped along the southbound direction, southbound right turns are hazardous) In addition, many pedestrians cross Valley Street near Village Plaza to get to the bus stops. • • V. Findings and Recommendat ions This section summarizes the site-specific and corridor-wide potential strategies and recommendations to improve the issues from the previous section, safety benefit, time frame, cost, and jurisdiction. Ratings used in the recommendation tables are described as follows: Symbol     Meaning Low safety benefit potential Low to moderate safety benefit potential Moderate safety benefit potential High safety benefit potential Definition May reduce total crashes by 1-25% 1 May reduce total crashes by 26-49%1 May reduce total crashes by 50-74%1 May reduce total crashes by 75+%1 $ Low cost $$ Medium cost $$$ High cost Could be accomplished through maintenance May require some engineering or design and funding may be readily available Longer term project that may require full engineering, right of way acquisition and new funding ◔ Short term ◑ Medium term ◕ Long term Could be accomplished within 1 year Could be accomplished in 1 to 3 years; may require some engineering Could be accomplished in 3 years or more; may require full engineering Recommendat ions The following represents the specific findings and recommendations made by the RSA team. All recommendations and designs should be thoroughly evaluated with due diligence and designed as appropriate by the roadway owner and/or a professional engineer for conformance to codes, standards, and best practices. 1 Based on existing Crash Modification Factors (CMFs), the Highway Safety Manual (HSM), FHWA Proven Safety Countermeasures and current research, where applicable. All safety benefits are approximate. Valley St reet (CR 638) Road Saf et y Audit 13 Table 4 – Corridor-Wide Recommendations No. Recommendation Safety Benefit Cost Time Frame Jurisdiction  $$ ◑ County  $$$ ◕ County 2 $$ ◑ Township 2 $ ◑ County 2 $$$ ◕ County/ Township  $$ ◑ County  $$ ◔ County  $ ◔ County 2 $$$ ◕ County  $ ◔ County  $ ◔ County/ Township 2 $ ◑ County/ Township Operations 1 Study highway and pedestrian scale lighting Consider corridor-wide signal upgrades (replace 8” traffic signal heads with 12”, install backplates with retroreflective border, evaluate clearance intervals, update to countdown pedestrian signal heads, replace push buttons in compliance with ADA, etc.) Investigate on-street parking requirements where business have existing parking lots (parking study) and for conformance with Title 39. 2 3 4 Consider re-striping the shoulder and edgelines 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Bicycle/Pedestrian Study corridor-wide implementation of curb extensions (bump-outs) based on the site-specific recommendations to maintain consistency Consider development of an access management plan within the project limits (many sidewalks are disrupted by poorly constructed driveways) Inspect, repair and construct sidewalks in compliance with ADA as needed Inspect existing crosswalk striping for wear and restripe accordingly Consider upgrading all ramps for ADA compliance and addressing ponding issues at street junction Maintenance Inspect and replace faded, damaged or incorrect signage as needed (i.e. signs mounted below 7’ or back-to-back signs that obscure shapes [e.g. Do Not Enter behind Stop sign]) Consider performing necessary foliage trimming and obstacle removal to improve visibility of signs and pedestrian pathways, respectively Education Consider sidewalk, crosswalk, multimodal education campaign and code enforcement The following site-specific recommendations are in addition to the corridor-wide improvements, except where noted otherwise. Of note, the improvements listed below were proposed by the County, Township and/or private developer at the time of the RSA (see Appendices I and J). 2 CMF/quantitative data not available for this type of roadway or treatment. Therefore, perceived safety benefit of the same was estimated relative to other similar treatments. Valley St reet (CR 638) Road Saf et y Audit 14 • • • • • • Essex County plans to install a traffic signal at the Pierson Road intersection. The curb ramp along Valley Street southbound at the Harvard Avenue and Girard Place intersections will be removed. Maplewood Township plans to reconstruct the southeast curb line at the Tuscan Road intersection to narrow the pedestrian crossing distance. Plans also include relocating the stop bars on the southbound and westbound approaches. Maplewood Township plans to reconstruct the southwest curb line at the Baker Street intersection to realign the Baker Street approach to be perpendicular with Valley Street. Plans also include relocating the stop bars on the northbound and eastbound approaches. A mixed-use building is proposed in the southwest corner of the Valley Street and 4th Street intersection in South Orange. Access to the same will only be provided along 4th Street, which will may increase the traffic at this intersection, but will eliminate two driveways along Valley Street. The timing of any changes should be coordinated between Essex County and South Orange as water main replacements and valve repairs are needed along Valley Street in South Orange. Table 5 – Site-Specific Recommendations No. 13 14 Recommendation Maplewood Millburn Avenue Perform intersection analysis of intersection (two approach lanes, only one receiving) Consider delayed (inside/outside clearance) or lag left turn signals along Millburn Safety Benefit Cost Time Frame Jurisdiction  $$ ◕ County  $ ◔ County ◑ County 15 Consider changing the EBT/R lane to EBR-only  $ 16 Explore changing yield signs to stop signs  $ ◔ County Review the pedestrian islands for ADA compliance or consider elimination of channelized right turns Consider corridor-wide recommendation 2, 8, and 9 regarding signal upgrades (especially pedestrian), crosswalks, and ADA compliance Consider corridor-wide recommendation 11 regarding foliage and obstacle removal  $$ ◑ County  $$$ ◕ County/ Township  $ ◔ County 20 Explore turn restrictions at Villa Terrace  $$ ◑ County/ Township 21 Consider track lines through the intersection  $ ◔ County  2 $$$ ◕ County 17 18 19 22 Rynda Road Consider corridor-wide recommendation 8 and 9 regarding crosswalks and ADA compliance 2 CMF/quantitative data not available for this type of roadway or treatment. Therefore, perceived safety benefit of the same was estimated relative to other similar treatments. Valley St reet (CR 638) Road Saf et y Audit 15 No. 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 Recommendation Consider SB flashing “Red Signal Ahead” sign for Millburn Avenue Broadview Avenue Consider corridor-wide recommendation 8 and 9 regarding crosswalks and ADA compliance Consider removing the curb ramp along Valley Street southbound at this intersection South Pierson Road/Pierson Road Explore corridor-wide recommendation 1 regarding pedestrian and highway scale lighting issues Consider additional pedestrian accommodations at this location (LPI, exclusive ped phase or ped recall) Investigate southbound left turn restrictions onto S Pierson (cut-through to Springfield Ave) Consider corridor-wide recommendation 8 regarding crosswalks and signing of the same Park Avenue Investigate sight distance issues along Valley Street near this location Consider extending Park Ave boulevard treatment to intersection Consider corridor-wide recommendation 4 regarding edge lines (4-6’ shoulder) Girard Place/Sommer Avenue Consider corridor-wide recommendation 8 and 10 regarding inspecting crosswalks and signage Study the need for a traffic signal or HAWK by performing a warrant analysis per MUTCD Harvard Avenue Consider corridor-wide recommendation 2 regarding signal upgrades Consider corridor-wide recommendation 11 regarding foliage and obstacle removal Investigate the complaints of student drop-off and pick-up (coordinate with residents and school) Tuscan Road Explore reducing the curb radii Safety Benefit Cost Time Frame Jurisdiction  $ ◔ County 2 $$$ ◕ County/ Township  $ ◔ County  $$ ◑ County  $ ◑ County  $ ◔ County  $ ◔ County 2 $ ◔ County 2 $$ ◑ County 2 $ ◑ County  $ ◔ County  $$ ◑ County  $$$ ◕ County  $ ◔ County 2 $ ◔ Township  2 $$$ ◕ Township 2 CMF/quantitative data not available for this type of roadway or treatment. Therefore, perceived safety benefit of the same was estimated relative to other similar treatments. Valley St reet (CR 638) Road Saf et y Audit 16 No. Recommendation Safety Benefit Cost Time Frame Jurisdiction 39 Consider connecting the missing sidewalk between this street and Baker St along Valley St northbound to complete the network.  $$$ ◕ County 40 Investigate sight distance issues  $ ◔ County Consider corridor-wide recommendation 4 regarding edge line and shoulder striping Consider corridor-wide recommendation 2 regarding signal upgrades Consider corridor-wide recommendation 9 regarding ADA compliance Consider corridor-wide recommendation 12 (education and code enforcement) Baker Street Investigate providing a shoulder and buffer for the sidewalks Consider corridor-wide recommendation 7 and 9 regarding sidewalks and ADA compliance; add sidewalk to the eastern side Consider corridor-wide recommendation 2 and 10 regarding signal and sign upgrades Consider adding pavement markings for the left turn lane on Valley Street 2 $ ◑ County  $$$ ◕ County  $$$ ◕ County 2 $ ◑ County/ Township  $$ ◑ County  $$$ ◕ County  $$$ ◑ County  $ ◔ County  $$$ ◕ County/ Township  $ ◔ County  $$ ◔ County  $ ◔ County/ Township  2 $$ ◕ Township 2 $$ ◑ County  $$$ ◕ County  $ ◔ County 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 Consider implementing a small roundabout North & South Crescent Consider addressing the drainage issues at the SE corner Consider adding a channelized island, moving the crosswalk closer to the intersection, and adding a crosswalk on the northern side Consider corridor-wide recommendation 11 regarding foliage trimming and obstacle removal Explore reducing the curb radii Oakview Avenue Explore relocating the bus stops (SB stop causes queuing; NB stop blocks visibility) Consider corridor-wide recommendation 8 and 9 regarding crosswalks and ADA compliance Consider relocating static “signal ahead” signs (W33) further from the intersection 2 CMF/quantitative data not available for this type of roadway or treatment. Therefore, perceived safety benefit of the same was estimated relative to other similar treatments. Valley St reet (CR 638) Road Saf et y Audit 17 No. 57 58 59 Recommendation Consider traffic calming measures on Oakview Investigate corridor-wide recommendation 2 regarding signal upgrades (“Don’t Walk” hand not functional) Evaluate signal timing for adequate side street green time, clearance intervals, etc. Safety Benefit Cost Time Frame Jurisdiction  $$ ◑ County  $$$ ◕ County  $$ ◑ County  $$$ ◕ County/ Township 60 Consider implementing a small roundabout 61 Park Road Consider adding static “signal ahead” signs (W3-3) for NB/SB approaches Oakland Road/Lincoln Place 2 $ ◔ County 62 Consider widening NB sidewalk  $$ ◔ County  $ ◔ County/ Township  $ ◔ County  2 $$$ ◕ County  $ ◔ County/ Township  $ ◔ County  $ ◔ County/ Township  $ ◔ County/ Township 2 $ ◔ County  $$$ ◕ County/ Township 2 $ ◔ County 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 Edgewood Place Consider corridor-wide recommendation 11 for foliage and obstacle removal Consider corridor-wide recommendation 10 for sign replacement (i.e. breakaway poles) Jefferson Avenue Consider corridor-wide recommendation 9 for ADA compliance Consider corridor-wide recommendation 10 and 11 for sign replacement (especially SB) as well as foliage and obstacle removal Crowell Place Consider corridor-wide recommendation 10 for sign replacement (no breakaway poles) Consider corridor-wide recommendation 11 for foliage and obstacle removal (especially WBR’s) Parker Avenue Explore options to make pedestrians more visible during school peak hours (8:00 am, 10:45am1:15pm, 3:00pm) Evaluate signal timing for adequate side street green time, clearance intervals, ped recall, etc. Consider corridor-wide recommendation 2 and 5 for traffic signal upgrades and curb extensions Explore the option of an all-ped phase, especially during school hours 2 CMF/quantitative data not available for this type of roadway or treatment. Therefore, perceived safety benefit of the same was estimated relative to other similar treatments. Valley St reet (CR 638) Road Saf et y Audit 18 Safety Benefit Cost Time Frame Jurisdiction Consider corridor-wide recommendation 4 and 8 for roadway edge lines and crosswalks Consider corridor-wide recommendation 6 to evaluate the access management given the number of gas station driveways near the intersection Hixon Place 2 $ ◑ County  $$ ◑ County Investigate the purpose of the one-way street  $ ◔ Township Consider corridor-wide recommendation 4 and 5 for roadway edge lines and curb extensions Consider corridor-wide recommendation 7 and 9 for sidewalk improvements and ADA compliance Investigate the impact of new commercial developments on operations and access  2 $$$ ◕ County/ Township 2 $$$ ◕ County 2 $ ◔ County/ Township Inspect intersections for appropriate signage  $ ◔ County Coordinate with the school plan to create a smart route plan (Safe Routes to School) Consider corridor-wide recommendation 6 regarding access management (especially around the high school) Examine striping and lane widths along Valley Street (the centerline striping appears to be offset from the center of the roadway) Consider corridor-wide recommendation 10 and 11 for sign and obstacle inspections, especially truck restrictions (which are not visible from Valley St) South Orange Village Arnold Terrace Study the need for a traffic signal or HAWK by performing a warrant analysis per MUTCD  $ ◔ County  $$ ◑ County  $$ ◑ County  $ ◔ County/ Township  $$ ◑ County Investigate the purpose of the one-way street  $ ◔ Township Consider corridor-wide recommendation 4 and 5 for roadway edge lines and curb extensions Consider corridor-wide recommendation 7 and 9 for sidewalk improvements and ADA compliance 2 $$$ ◕ County/ Township 2 $$$ ◕ County No. 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 Recommendation 88 Inspect intersections for appropriate signage  $ ◔ County 89 Coordinate with the school plan to create a smart route plan (Safe Routes to School)  $ ◔ County 2 CMF/quantitative data not available for this type of roadway or treatment. Therefore, perceived safety benefit of the same was estimated relative to other similar treatments. Valley St reet (CR 638) Road Saf et y Audit 19 No. 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 Recommendation Explore on-street parking elimination since lots are available behind shopping center and sight distance may be obstructed Examine striping and lane widths along Valley Street (the centerline striping appears to be offset from the center of the roadway) Consider corridor-wide recommendation 10 and 11 for sign and obstacle inspections, especially truck restrictions (which are not visible from Valley St) Investigate alternate locations for the bus stop near Blink Fitness Roland Avenue Consider corridor-wide recommendation 4 and 6 for roadway edge lines and access management Consider corridor-wide recommendation 7 and 9 for sidewalk improvements and ADA compliance Lackawanna Place/5th Street/Massel Terrace Investigate corridor-wide recommendation 8 and 9 for crosswalk issues and ADA compliance Investigate installing curb extensions to reduce crossing time across Valley Street Study bus stop locations and consider relocation beyond crosswalk to maximize pedestrian visibility Investigate the lack of double yellow lines on the side streets 4th Street Study the need for a traffic signal by performing a warrant analysis per MUTCD Consider implementing a left turn lane on Valley St 3 Consider corridor-wide recommendation 2 and 10 for sign and signal upgrades Consider corridor-wide recommendations 4, 5, and 8 for potential edge line, curb extensions, and crosswalk issues3 3rd Street Consider corridor-wide recommendation 2 for signal upgrades Safety Benefit Cost Time Frame Jurisdiction  $ ◔ County  $$ ◑ County  $ ◔ County/ Township  $ ◔ County/ Township 2 $$ ◑ County 2 $$ ◑ County  $$ ◑ County  $ ◔ County 2 $$ ◑ County 2 $ ◔ County  $$$ ◕ County  $ ◑ County  $$ ◑ County 2 $$$ ◕ County/ Township  $$$ ◕ County 2 CMF/quantitative data not available for this type of roadway or treatment. Therefore, perceived safety benefit of the same was estimated relative to other similar treatments. 3 These recommendations may conflict with the January 2018 County Planning Board decision regarding the Meridia, Village Commons 1 application bullet 3 to maintain the current curb alignment. See Appendix J. Valley St reet (CR 638) Road Saf et y Audit 20 Safety Benefit Cost Time Frame Jurisdiction 2 $$ ◑ County  $ ◔ County/ Township  $$ ◑ County/ Township 2 $$$ ◕ County  2 $$$ ◕ County/ Township  $$$ ◕ Township/ County  $$$ ◕ County 2 $ ◔ County/ Township  $ ◔ County  $ ◑ County/ Township  $ ◔ County  $ ◔ County 117 Consider implementing a left turn lane on Valley St  $$ ◑ County 118 Consider adding a northern crosswalk  $ ◔ County 119 Investigate the lack of crosswalk at Village Plaza  $ ◔ County Consider corridor-wide recommendation 5 for curb extensions or refuge island Consider recommendation 1 to study highway and 121 pedestrian lighting 2 $$$ ◕ County/ Township  $$ ◑ County No. Recommendation Consider the impact continual development will 105 have upon multimodal transportation center and intersection operation Consider corridor-wide recommendation 11 106 regarding foliage, especially the hedges at Valley National Bank Investigate adding a left turn lane for all 107 approaches Consider recommendation 8 and 9 for restriping 108 crosswalks and ADA compliance Examine intersection geometry (curb radii are tight 109 for trucks) Study the need for a full pedestrian phase, at least 110 during the peak pedestrian hours, including the parking garage/pedestrian traffic on 3rd St. 2nd Street Consider corridor-wide recommendation 2 for sign 111 upgrades (especially advanced pedestrian warning signs) Explore the sight distance issues on 2nd St EB or 112 consider prohibiting left turns. Investigate a left turn lane for Valley St NB at this intersection. 1st Street Investigate methods to improve lane discipline 113 along S-curve Explore options to improve sight distance and 114 pedestrian visibility, specifically at/near bus stops Consider corridor-wide recommendation 10 for 115 improved signage (notably lacking “one way” signs) Provide more advanced warning of a lane drop for 116 SB traffic Village Plaza 120 2 CMF/quantitative data not available for this type of roadway or treatment. Therefore, perceived safety benefit of the same was estimated relative to other similar treatments. Valley St reet (CR 638) Road Saf et y Audit 21 No. Recommendation Consider recommendation 6 to evaluate the access management Consider repurposing the Valley Street southbound outside lane for pedestrian use (i.e. parklet, public 123 plaza) since Valley St is 2-lanes north and south of this location. Note: SOTAC has discussed widening of sidewalk along Valley Street (see #119) South Orange Avenue Perform intersection analysis of area (suggested to 124 include surrounding intersections and lane analysis for Irvington Ave/Academy St) 122 125 Explore improving the poor sight distances 126 Consider lowering speed limit on S. Orange Ave Consider corridor-wide recommendations 1 and 2 to perform a lighting study and update signal heads Note: SOTAC has discussed a new plan for this intersection including limit SB traffic to one lane, providing curb extensions on SW corner of intersection; parallel parking on Valley SB between 128 S Orange Ave & 1st St or widen sidewalks for walking and dining; transforming Village Plaza into a pedestrian corridor; and coordinating signal timings between S Orange Ave and 3rd St 127 Safety Benefit Cost Time Frame Jurisdiction  $$ ◑ County  $/$$ 4 ◔/◑4 County/ Township  2 $$$ ◕ County/ Township  $$ ◑ County  $ ◑ County  $$$ ◕ County - - - - Road Owner Response An important part of the RSA process is the road owner’s response: an acknowledgment of the audit’s findings and recommendations, and their planned follow-up. In responding to the RSA’s findings, the road owner must bear in mind all the competing objectives involved when implementing the recommendations, and foremost among them is available resources. Because the audit process generated a long and wide-ranging list of improvements, the road owner is expected to implement as time and funds allow in coordination with other projects and priorities. Essex County delivered their response following the finalization of the findings and recommendations table, a copy of which can be found in Appendix K. 4 Interim (temporary) cost or timeframe / permanent cost or timeframe CMF/quantitative data not available for this type of roadway or treatment. Therefore, perceived safety benefit of the same was estimated relative to other similar treatments. 2 Valley St reet (CR 638) Road Saf et y Audit 22 Recommendat ion Visualizat ions Examples of some of the site-specific and corridor-wide safety recommendations identified in Tables 4 and 5 are shown below and are based on current practices and standards. Descriptions and images of each treatment are from the 2017 NJ Complete Street Design Guide (CSDG) and NACTO’s Urban Street Design Guide (NACTO-US) and Urban Bikeway Design Guide (NACTO-UB), including sources contained therein. The list of treatments is not exhaustive. 1. Pedest rian Facilit ies Curb extensions visually and physically narrow the roadway at intersections and midblock locations, creating safer and shorter pedestrian crossings, while increasing the available space for streetscape. They increase the overall visibility of pedestrians by aligning them with the parking lane and help prohibit vehicles from parking in violation of Title 39. Crossing islands, or pedestrian refuge islands, reduce the exposure time of pedestrians to vehicular traffic. They enable pedestrians to make a crossing in two stages — crossing one direction of vehicular travel lanes, pausing at the island, and then completing the crossing. They are recommended where a pedestrian must cross three lanes of traffic in one or both directions but may be implemented on smaller cross sections where space permits. Figure 11 – Pedestrian Facility Examples Left: Curb Extension. Right: Crossing Island (Source: CSDG) An example of both options at South Crescent is shown in Figure 12. Valley St reet (CR 638) Road Saf et y Audit 23 Figure 12 – Recommendation at South Crescent. Left: Crossing Island. Right: Curb Extension. Parklets are typically applied where narrow or congested sidewalks prevent the installation of traditional sidewalk cafes, or where local property owners or residents see a need to expand the seating capacity and public space on a given street. Public plazas are generally larger and reclaim unused/underutilized street space from vehicles to pedestrians. Both parklets and public plazas can be implemented on an interim basis. Heavy planters, granite blocks, moveable seating, and other street furniture elements may be incorporated into the interim design. They also make intersections more compact, and easier to cross for pedestrians, as well as slow traffic speeds and improve safety. Such spaces could be implemented along Valley Street southbound between S. Orange Avenue and First Street. Figure 13 – Parklet Example (Source: NACTO) 2. Bicycle Facilit ies Bicycle lanes provide an exclusive space for bicyclists using pavement markings and signage. Intended for one-way travel, they are typically located on both sides of a two-way street. Bicycle lanes enable bicyclists to ride at their preferred speed, free from interference from motorists. Where it is not feasible or appropriate to provide dedicated bicycle facilities, shared-lane markings (e.g. “sharrows”) may be used to indicate a shared environment for bicycles and Valley St reet (CR 638) Road Saf et y Audit 24 vehicles, such as the ones currently implemented along Hamilton Street in New Brunswick. Bicycle lanes and shared-lane markings should be extended through intersections and major driveways to enhance continuity, guide bicyclists through the intersection, and improve driver awareness of bicycle activity and movement. Figure 14 – Bicycle Facility Examples Left: Bicycle Lane Adjacent to Parking or Curb (Source: NACTO-UB). Right: Sharrow Markings (Source: CSDG) 3. Roadway Reconf igurat ion This treatment allows reallocation of existing street space (i.e. roadway cross section) to accommodate multi-modal users. Lane configuration and width for travel, turning movements, parking, and bicycle lanes can be adjusted to optimize use for vehicles, pedestrians, bicyclists and transit. Based on the recommendations listed in Section V-A, one option for Valley Street cross sections is shown in Figure 15, assuming an approximate existing width of 38 feet curb-to-curb. For example, by providing edge lines as recommended, part of the pavement can be reallocated as a shoulder that can be used by bicyclists or for parking. Alternatively, this reclaimed area can be used for accessible bus stops or bicycle corrals. Figure 15 – Conceptual Cross Sections based on Recommendations (Maplewood) Valley St reet (CR 638) Road Saf et y Audit 25 Figure 16 – Conceptual Cross Sections based on Recommendations (South Orange) 4. Transit Facilit ies While stop location determines to a large extent how transit vehicles approach stops and interact with traffic, the physical configuration of stops and stations impact how riders interact with the transit system. Transit stops play a significant role in the urban street puzzle, and can be used not only to provide comfortable and accessible transit access, but also to organize traffic interactions and manage curbside activity. Curbside pull-out stops (or bus bays) are areas separated from the travel lanes and off the normal section of a roadway that provides for the pickup and discharge of passengers. This design allows through traffic to flow freely without the obstruction of stopped buses and works well for bus stops on streets with curbside parking. Boarding bulb stops use curb extensions that align the transit stop with the parking lane, creating an in-lane stop. They can become a focal point for improved public space along the street, creating space for waiting passengers, furnishings, bike parking, and other pedestrian amenities and community facilities without encroaching on the pedestrian through zone. Figure 17 – Example of Bus Pull-Out Stop & Bulb Stop (alternative use of curbside) Valley St reet (CR 638) Road Saf et y Audit 26 5. Roundabout Roundabout design, which was recommended at the intersections of Valley Street with Baker Street and South Crescent, should create conditions that reduce vehicle speed and provide a consistent speed into, through, and out of the roundabout. Lower speeds reduce crash frequency and severity for all roadway users, allow safer and easier merging of traffic, provide more reaction time for drivers, and make the facility more accessible for novice users. Figure 18 – Roundabout Example (Source: CSDG) VI. Conclusions The Valley Street RSA was conducted to identify issues that compromise multimodal use of the roadway. The team identified a long list of issues from the field visit, as well as many practical short-, mid- and long-term improvements during the post-audit. The recommendations documented in this report are designed to improve safety for all users of Valley Street. Some of the strategies identified can be implemented through routine maintenance; all will be constrained by available time and budgetary priorities. The audit process and the resulting final document highlight the safety issues, and present the needed improvements, by location, organized for systematic implementation by the roadway owner. When it comes to improving safety, engineering strategies alone only go so far. This is especially true when trying to address pedestrian safety in an area undergoing redevelopment. Education, with support from a targeted enforcement campaign, is an effective approach for addressing driver and pedestrian behaviors that lead to crashes. Employing a multipronged approach is an effective course of action to advance the goal of improved safety on the corridor. Valley St reet (CR 638) Road Saf et y Audit 27 Appendix A - RSA Team Audit Team Name Annette DePalma Catherine Outlaw Paul J Kittner, Jr. Vic DeLuca Nancy Adams Matt Jones Jim DeVaul Howard Levison Salvatore Renda Walter Clarke Asif Mahmood Jim Lombard David Antonio Dan LiSanti Amon Boucher Mark Tozzi Joseph Powell Christine Mittman Aimee Jefferson Bernie Boerchers Andrew Halloran Julia Steponanko Valley St reet (CR 638) Agency Maplewood Township Maplewood Township Maplewood Township Maplewood Township Maplewood Township Maplewood Township - Police Department Maplewood Township - Police Department South Orange Township South Orange Township South Orange Township Essex County Essex County Essex County NJDOT – Bureau of Transportation Data and Safety NJDOT – Bureau of Transportation Data and Safety NJDOT – Bureau of Transportation Data and Safety NJDOT – Office of Bicycle and Pedestrian Programs NJTPA NJTPA Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. (NJDOT Consultant) Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. Road Saf et y Audit A1 Appendix B – Area Map D ND AN LA KL AK OA O D RD R D RD K R RK AR PA P R OR LO YL AY TA T PL P VILLAGE VILLAGE PLAZA VE AV EA GE NG AN A R R S O S T ST TS ST 1S 1 EW W VI E KV AK OA AV E A E T ST TS 1ST 1 T ST TS NT EN CE RESC CR C N N D ST 2ND 2N ST D S 2ND 2N T ST TS NT EN CE RESC CR S C S D RD R GI I G ARD RA D P PL L SO OM S MM ME ER A AV VE E RD W EW VI E ADVI OAD BRO BR RD E AVE AV RD A RD NA RYN RY RN BURN LBU LL I MI L M RR L TERR EL ASSE M AS T H ST 5TH 5T E VE AV D A ND AN LA OL RO R R RR ER TE D T LD OL NO ARN A ON SO XS I X HI H L PL P 0) 630) CR 63 ( E( CR AVE AV PA P AR RK KE ER R AV E BEGIN BEGIN PROJECT PROJECT ON ERSO E S PI S NJ NJ TRANSIT TRANSIT MORRIS MORRIS & & ESSEX ESSEX PA ARK P K A AV VE N ON RSO I PI ER P T ST H S 4TH 4T ST H S 4TH VALLEY ST (CR 638) ) VA 38 L L E R 6 YS C T( N AN CA SC US TU T ST D S 3RD 3R T ST D S 3RD 3R HA AR H RVAR RD AV VE A E T ST R S KER BAKE BA VE AV ER A KE K R A A P N.T.S. GPIGreenman-Pedersen, Inc. PROJECT LOCATION Engineering and Construction Services R JE OF NEW S TA TE T EN OF TRANS PO R E TH 0) 51 AV A VE E A VE ON TI A T L PL T P TT ET N N N ON CO CR ( ( W I EW VI KV AK OA O MAPLEWOOD & S ORANGE VILLAGE TOWNSHIPS ESSEX COUNTY L PL P END END PROJECT PROJECT N NJ JT R T N RA A I NS T S I T MO MOR RR S RI I S& & E S S E E S X S E X N LN OL CO NC N I LI L PL I RV R I N N GT G ON O D W OO EW G D E E NJDOT HSIP ROAD SAFETY AUDIT CR 638 (VALLEY ST) D D R N ND A L A L T O C OT S S ) 8 3 6 R C ( ( E VE AV A DEP AR TM N ON RSO ER FE FF EF JE S E Y L PL LP W EL N N R R O CO Appendix C – Traf f ic Dat a New Jersey Department of Transportation Daily Volume from 05/15/2012 through 05/17/2012 Site Names: County: Funct. Class: Location: 3N5H705, , VALLEY ST-.15, 07000638__, Maplewood Twp ESSEX Urban Minor Arterial BET CO 630, MILLBURN AVE & RYNDA RD Sun 05/13/2012 ROAD W E 00:00 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 07:00 08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 Volume AM Peak Vol AM Peak Fct AM Peak Hr PM Peak Vol PM Peak Fct PM Peak Hr Seasonal Fct Daily Fct Axle Fct Pulse Fct Mon 05/14/2012 ROAD W E Seasonal Factor Group: Daily Factor Group: Axle Factor Group: Growth Factor Group: Tue 05/15/2012 ROAD W E 965 836 833 869 825 885 921 925 1,037 1,029 929 864 662 501 378 196 12,655 562 437 448 460 431 491 500 506 578 487 443 441 333 220 172 87 6,596 403 399 385 409 394 394 421 419 459 542 486 423 329 281 206 109 6,059 1,037 1.00 16:00 1.000 1.000 0.500 2.000 578 1.00 16:00 1.000 1.000 0.500 2.000 542 1.00 17:00 1.000 1.000 0.500 2.000 Wed 05/16/2012 Thu 05/17/2012 Fri 05/18/2012 ROAD W E ROAD W E ROAD W E 93 39 54 117 44 73 55 22 33 66 28 38 32 21 11 44 13 31 18 6 12 29 14 15 65 32 33 80 44 36 168 111 57 202 136 66 512 286 226 513 289 224 906 529 377 941 562 379 1,016 616 400 877 470 407 831 471 360 847 447 400 887 465 422 902 482 420 946 516 430 963 491 472 912 476 436 1,033 464 569 938 448 490 884 428 456 784 350 434 614 303 311 394 174 220 242 102 140 14,919 7,749 7,170 1,051 568 483 1,016 616 407 1.00 1.00 1.00 8:00 8:00 9:00 1,033 516 569 1.00 1.00 1.00 17:00 14:00 17:00 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 Sat 05/19/2012 ROAD W E Collected by: NJDOT Created 07/19/2012 1:35:21PM ROAD AADT 14,783 W AADT 7,738 E AADT 7,046 DV03: Page 1 of 1 New Jersey Department of Transportation Daily % Class Distribution for 05/15/2012 Through 05/17/2012 (48 hours) Site Names: County: Funct. Class: Location: 3N5H705, , VALLEY ST-.15, 07000638__, Maplewood Twp ESSEX Urban Minor Arterial BET CO 630, MILLBURN AVE & RYNDA RD Roadway W DIR MC CAR PU BUS 2D SU 3 SU 4+ ST 4ST 5 ST 6+ MT 5MT 6 MT 7+ UNCLS Trucks Combo Trucks Classified Volume Axle Factor 0.6 80.0 13.0 1.5 1.3 0.9 0.1 0.3 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 3.8 1.6 98.9 29,566 0.487 0.4 81.4 11.8 1.4 1.4 0.5 0.0 0.3 1.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 3.9 2.0 99.0 15,475 0.485 Seasonal Factor Group: Daily Factor Group: Axle Factor Group: Growth Factor Group: E DIR 0.8 78.4 14.3 1.7 1.1 1.3 0.1 0.4 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 3.7 1.1 98.9 14,091 0.489 Collected by: NJDOT 7/19/2012 2:59:19PM DC02: Page 1 of 1 New Jersey Department of Transportation Roadway Detail Daily Class Distribution Beginning 05/15/2012 Site Name: 3N5H705 County: ESSEX MC 5/15 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-13 13-14 14-15 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 20-21 21-22 22-23 23-24 Day 5/16 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-13 13-14 14-15 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 Location: BET CO 630, MILLBURN AVE & RYNDA RD CAR 6 5 4 5 3 2 3 7 4 3 6 4 6 3 1 2 64 0 1 0 0 1 1 3 5 6 6 2 4 3 7 4 13 7 6 4 790 672 636 660 654 709 739 721 854 825 776 733 574 440 318 172 10,273 89 45 27 13 52 131 405 715 766 692 634 646 702 711 754 793 711 829 781 PU 107 108 124 138 112 115 125 129 120 128 85 79 50 33 43 15 1,511 4 7 0 1 9 24 74 130 159 122 124 133 123 117 135 97 127 130 108 BUS 17 12 26 15 12 14 19 19 14 16 15 8 7 5 1 1 201 0 0 1 0 0 5 10 13 24 15 16 9 9 14 18 18 20 20 11 2D SU 3 11 9 10 16 17 20 10 13 6 13 7 5 2 3 3 3 148 0 0 2 2 1 5 6 13 23 16 16 15 16 17 9 7 13 7 6 9 5 4 13 10 6 8 9 6 12 12 7 5 4 1 2 113 0 0 0 0 0 2 7 9 10 5 9 11 8 7 5 5 8 4 8 SU 4+ ST 40 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 1 1 1 0 8 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 4 2 0 2 3 2 2 3 3 4 4 3 5 0 41 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 4 7 3 5 4 1 0 2 2 0 ST 5 15 8 11 5 5 9 8 12 26 19 15 11 5 2 0 0 151 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 11 17 7 12 12 12 18 8 20 12 27 11 ROADWAY % SU % MU PEAK HOUR 1.16 2.7 Created: 7/19/2012 2:49:09PM ST 6+ MT 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MT 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 POSDIR % SU % MU 1.41 1.05 MT 7+ UNCLS TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 14 13 14 12 8 6 13 5 9 10 11 8 7 5 1 145 0 0 1 1 1 0 4 9 10 9 11 12 7 7 12 10 12 8 9 965 836 833 869 825 885 921 925 1,037 1,029 929 864 662 501 378 196 12,655 93 55 32 18 65 168 512 906 1,016 877 831 847 887 902 946 963 912 1,033 938 % SU 2.07 1.67 1.80 3.45 3.27 2.94 1.95 2.38 1.16 2.53 2.05 1.62 1.21 1.60 1.32 2.55 2.13 0.00 0.00 6.25 16.67 3.08 4.17 2.54 2.43 3.25 2.51 3.01 3.31 2.93 2.66 1.48 1.25 2.30 1.06 1.49 % MU % TRK 1.66 1.32 1.80 0.81 0.61 1.24 1.19 1.51 2.70 2.14 1.94 1.74 1.36 1.00 1.32 0.00 1.52 0.00 3.64 3.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.59 1.32 1.77 1.25 2.29 1.77 1.92 2.44 0.95 2.08 1.54 2.81 1.17 3.73 2.99 3.60 4.26 3.88 4.18 3.15 3.89 3.86 4.66 3.98 3.36 2.57 2.59 2.65 2.55 3.64 0.00 3.64 9.38 16.67 3.08 4.17 3.13 3.75 5.02 3.76 5.29 5.08 4.85 5.10 2.43 3.32 3.84 3.87 2.67 AXL FAC 0.486 0.490 0.486 0.490 0.493 0.490 0.490 0.487 0.480 0.482 0.484 0.485 0.489 0.491 0.492 0.498 0.487 0.500 0.479 0.486 0.468 0.491 0.497 0.493 0.488 0.485 0.490 0.483 0.484 0.484 0.482 0.492 0.484 0.487 0.479 0.489 NEGDIR % SU % MU 2.76 1.95 DC04: Page 1 of 6 New Jersey Department of Transportation Roadway Detail Daily Class Distribution Beginning 05/15/2012 Site Name: 3N5H705 County: ESSEX MC 5/16 19-20 20-21 21-22 22-23 23-24 Day 5/17 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 Day Count 6 3 7 1 4 94 3 1 0 0 2 1 6 4 17 175 Location: BET CO 630, MILLBURN AVE & RYNDA RD CAR 734 624 482 310 194 11,840 94 48 27 22 61 144 406 731 1,533 23,646 PU 95 110 95 61 34 2,019 15 15 13 3 11 39 76 144 316 3,846 BUS 10 3 5 3 2 226 0 0 0 1 0 5 5 15 26 453 2D SU 3 5 10 3 2 1 195 2 1 1 2 2 4 7 15 34 377 5 10 6 7 4 130 0 0 0 0 1 5 5 9 20 263 SU 4+ 0 2 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 20 ST 44 2 4 1 0 44 2 1 2 1 1 0 2 4 13 98 ST 5 13 12 7 4 0 206 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 9 12 369 ROADWAY % SU % MU PEAK HOUR 1.16 2.7 Created: 7/19/2012 2:49:09PM ST 6+ MT 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MT 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 POSDIR % SU % MU 1.41 1.05 MT 7+ UNCLS TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 8 5 5 3 156 0 0 1 0 1 1 5 10 18 319 884 784 614 394 242 14,919 117 66 44 29 80 202 513 941 1,992 29,566 % SU 1.13 2.81 1.47 2.28 2.07 2.24 1.71 1.52 2.27 6.90 5.00 5.45 2.34 2.55 2.86 2.23 % MU % TRK 1.92 1.79 1.79 1.27 0.00 1.68 2.56 1.52 4.55 3.45 1.25 0.50 0.58 1.38 1.26 1.58 3.05 4.59 3.26 3.55 2.07 3.91 4.27 3.03 6.82 10.34 6.25 5.94 2.92 3.93 4.12 3.81 AXL FAC 0.486 0.483 0.487 0.487 0.496 0.486 0.486 0.493 0.480 0.485 0.484 0.484 0.494 0.489 0.489 0.487 NEGDIR % SU % MU 2.76 1.95 DC04: Page 2 of 6 New Jersey Department of Transportation Posdir Detail Daily Class Distribution Beginning 05/15/2012 Site Name: 3N5H705 County: ESSEX MC 5/15 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-13 13-14 14-15 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 20-21 21-22 22-23 23-24 Day 5/16 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-13 13-14 14-15 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 Location: BET CO 630, MILLBURN AVE & RYNDA RD CAR 4 3 2 4 2 2 1 4 0 2 6 3 3 2 1 2 41 0 1 0 0 1 1 3 5 2 4 1 2 2 4 2 9 4 5 3 314 318 281 310 314 314 327 328 373 443 390 359 292 250 177 92 4,882 52 28 10 8 26 42 161 285 283 325 275 295 329 320 327 378 333 448 392 PU 49 52 56 61 52 54 65 56 58 66 56 36 20 14 20 11 726 2 3 0 1 5 10 47 59 76 54 53 70 65 64 78 63 72 89 74 BUS 13 6 21 6 5 6 10 10 8 9 9 4 4 2 0 1 114 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 6 10 7 7 3 4 8 10 10 9 11 5 2D SU 3 6 3 4 6 6 10 4 6 3 4 3 2 0 1 3 2 63 0 0 1 1 0 3 2 3 9 7 3 7 6 8 4 3 4 5 3 SU 4+ 6 5 4 12 6 2 6 6 2 7 8 5 5 4 1 1 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 7 7 5 7 6 6 5 4 3 5 3 7 ST 40 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 6 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 4 1 0 1 1 1 2 2 2 4 1 2 1 0 25 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 5 2 2 4 0 0 1 1 0 ST 5 ST 6+ 4 3 5 0 2 0 5 2 10 5 5 2 0 1 0 0 44 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 6 2 3 6 3 5 0 3 1 5 3 ROADWAY % SU % MU PEAK HOUR 1.16 2.7 Created: 7/19/2012 2:49:09PM MT 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MT 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 POSDIR % SU % MU 1.41 1.05 MT 7+ UNCLS TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 7 8 8 7 5 2 6 3 3 7 6 3 5 2 0 78 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 5 7 2 6 7 4 2 5 3 7 2 3 403 399 385 409 394 394 421 419 459 542 486 423 329 281 206 109 6,059 54 33 11 12 33 57 226 377 400 407 360 400 422 420 430 472 436 569 490 % SU 2.98 2.01 2.08 4.65 3.05 3.05 2.38 2.86 1.09 2.21 2.26 2.13 1.82 1.78 2.43 2.75 2.46 0.00 0.00 9.09 16.67 3.03 5.26 2.65 2.65 4.00 2.95 2.78 3.75 3.08 3.10 1.86 1.27 2.06 1.41 2.04 % MU % TRK 1.24 1.25 2.34 0.24 0.51 0.25 1.43 0.72 2.61 1.29 1.44 1.42 0.30 1.07 0.49 0.00 1.14 0.00 3.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.88 1.86 1.50 0.74 2.22 2.00 1.18 2.14 0.00 0.64 0.46 1.05 0.61 4.22 3.26 4.42 4.89 3.55 3.30 3.80 3.58 3.70 3.51 3.70 3.55 2.13 2.85 2.91 2.75 3.60 0.00 3.03 9.09 16.67 3.03 5.26 3.54 4.51 5.50 3.69 5.00 5.75 4.27 5.24 1.86 1.91 2.52 2.46 2.65 AXL FAC 0.488 0.489 0.484 0.490 0.493 0.498 0.487 0.492 0.481 0.487 0.487 0.487 0.493 0.491 0.494 0.498 0.489 0.500 0.487 0.500 0.453 0.482 0.500 0.491 0.482 0.485 0.492 0.483 0.480 0.488 0.484 0.498 0.494 0.494 0.491 0.492 NEGDIR % SU % MU 2.76 1.95 DC04: Page 3 of 6 New Jersey Department of Transportation Posdir Detail Daily Class Distribution Beginning 05/15/2012 Site Name: 3N5H705 County: ESSEX MC 5/16 19-20 20-21 21-22 22-23 23-24 Day 5/17 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 Day Count 3 1 4 1 4 62 3 1 0 0 2 0 5 4 15 118 Location: BET CO 630, MILLBURN AVE & RYNDA RD CAR 365 331 234 165 108 5,520 57 25 18 13 29 50 163 290 645 11,047 PU 64 76 60 40 23 1,148 10 12 10 2 3 10 42 56 145 2,019 BUS 4 2 3 2 1 108 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 6 12 234 2D SU 3 2 6 0 1 0 78 1 0 1 0 0 1 3 6 12 153 4 7 5 7 4 96 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 6 12 188 SU 4+ 0 1 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 13 ST 43 2 1 1 0 25 2 0 2 0 1 0 2 1 8 58 ST 5 6 2 2 0 0 55 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 5 104 ROADWAY % SU % MU PEAK HOUR 1.16 2.7 Created: 7/19/2012 2:49:09PM ST 6+ MT 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MT 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 POSDIR % SU % MU 1.41 1.05 MT 7+ UNCLS TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 6 2 3 0 72 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 7 157 456 434 311 220 140 7,170 73 38 31 15 36 66 224 379 862 14,091 % SU 1.32 3.23 1.61 3.64 2.86 2.51 1.37 0.00 3.23 0.00 2.78 4.55 3.13 3.17 2.90 2.51 % MU % TRK 1.97 0.92 0.96 0.45 0.00 1.12 2.74 0.00 6.45 0.00 2.78 0.00 1.34 1.32 1.51 1.15 3.29 4.15 2.57 4.09 2.86 3.63 4.11 0.00 9.68 0.00 5.56 4.55 4.46 4.49 4.41 3.66 AXL FAC 0.485 0.489 0.490 0.490 0.493 0.489 0.488 0.500 0.473 0.500 0.472 0.493 0.488 0.487 0.488 0.489 NEGDIR % SU % MU 2.76 1.95 DC04: Page 4 of 6 New Jersey Department of Transportation Negdir Detail Daily Class Distribution Beginning 05/15/2012 Site Name: 3N5H705 County: ESSEX MC 5/15 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-13 13-14 14-15 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 20-21 21-22 22-23 23-24 Day 5/16 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-13 13-14 14-15 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 Location: BET CO 630, MILLBURN AVE & RYNDA RD CAR 2 2 2 1 1 0 2 3 4 1 0 1 3 1 0 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 2 1 2 1 3 2 4 3 1 1 476 354 355 350 340 395 412 393 481 382 386 374 282 190 141 80 5,391 37 17 17 5 26 89 244 430 483 367 359 351 373 391 427 415 378 381 389 PU 58 56 68 77 60 61 60 73 62 62 29 43 30 19 23 4 785 2 4 0 0 4 14 27 71 83 68 71 63 58 53 57 34 55 41 34 BUS 2D 4 6 5 9 7 8 9 9 6 7 6 4 3 3 1 0 87 0 0 1 0 0 4 5 7 14 8 9 6 5 6 8 8 11 9 6 SU 3 5 6 6 10 11 10 6 7 3 9 4 3 2 2 0 1 85 0 0 1 1 1 2 4 10 14 9 13 8 10 9 5 4 9 2 3 SU 4+ 3 0 0 1 4 4 2 3 4 5 4 2 0 0 0 1 33 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 2 3 0 2 5 2 2 1 2 3 1 1 ST 40 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 1 0 3 1 4 0 16 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 3 2 1 3 0 1 0 1 1 0 ST 5 11 5 6 5 3 9 3 10 16 14 10 9 5 1 0 0 107 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 4 11 5 9 6 9 13 8 17 11 22 8 ROADWAY % SU % MU PEAK HOUR 1.16 2.7 Created: 7/19/2012 2:49:09PM ST 6+ MT 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MT 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 POSDIR % SU % MU 1.41 1.05 MT 7+ UNCLS TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 5 6 5 3 4 7 2 6 3 5 5 2 3 1 67 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 4 3 7 5 5 3 5 7 7 5 6 6 562 437 448 460 431 491 500 506 578 487 443 441 333 220 172 87 6,596 39 22 21 6 32 111 286 529 616 470 471 447 465 482 516 491 476 464 448 % SU 1.42 1.37 1.56 2.39 3.48 2.85 1.60 1.98 1.21 2.87 1.81 1.13 0.60 1.36 0.00 2.30 1.82 0.00 0.00 4.76 16.67 3.13 3.60 2.45 2.27 2.76 2.13 3.18 2.91 2.80 2.28 1.16 1.22 2.52 0.65 0.89 % MU % TRK 1.96 1.37 1.34 1.30 0.70 2.04 1.00 2.17 2.77 3.08 2.48 2.04 2.40 0.91 2.33 0.00 1.86 0.00 4.55 4.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.35 0.95 1.95 1.70 2.34 1.57 2.58 2.70 1.74 3.46 2.52 4.96 1.79 3.38 2.75 2.90 3.70 4.18 4.89 2.60 4.15 3.98 5.95 4.29 3.17 3.00 2.27 2.33 2.30 3.68 0.00 4.55 9.52 16.67 3.13 3.60 2.80 3.21 4.71 3.83 5.52 4.47 5.38 4.98 2.91 4.68 5.04 5.60 2.68 AXL FAC 0.485 0.491 0.489 0.491 0.493 0.484 0.493 0.483 0.479 0.476 0.481 0.484 0.485 0.492 0.490 0.497 0.486 0.500 0.468 0.480 0.500 0.500 0.496 0.495 0.493 0.485 0.488 0.483 0.487 0.481 0.480 0.487 0.474 0.481 0.466 0.486 NEGDIR % SU % MU 2.76 1.95 DC04: Page 5 of 6 New Jersey Department of Transportation Negdir Detail Daily Class Distribution Beginning 05/15/2012 Site Name: 3N5H705 County: ESSEX MC 5/16 19-20 20-21 21-22 22-23 23-24 Day 5/17 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 Day Count Location: BET CO 630, MILLBURN AVE & RYNDA RD CAR 3 2 3 0 0 32 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 57 369 293 248 145 86 6,320 37 23 9 9 32 94 243 441 888 12,599 PU 31 34 35 21 11 871 5 3 3 1 8 29 34 88 171 1,827 BUS 6 1 2 1 1 118 0 0 0 1 0 2 2 9 14 219 2D SU 3 3 4 3 1 1 117 1 1 0 2 2 3 4 9 22 224 SU 4+ 1 3 1 0 0 34 0 0 0 0 1 3 1 3 8 75 ST 40 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 7 1 0 3 0 0 19 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 3 5 40 ST 5 7 10 5 4 0 151 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 5 7 265 ROADWAY % SU % MU PEAK HOUR 1.16 2.7 Created: 7/19/2012 2:49:09PM ST 6+ MT 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MT 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 POSDIR % SU % MU 1.41 1.05 MT 7+ UNCLS TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 2 3 2 3 84 0 0 1 0 1 1 4 4 11 162 428 350 303 174 102 7,749 44 28 13 14 44 136 289 562 1,130 15,475 % SU 0.93 2.29 1.32 0.57 0.98 1.99 2.27 3.57 0.00 14.29 6.82 5.88 1.73 2.14 2.83 1.98 % MU % TRK 1.87 2.86 2.64 2.30 0.00 2.19 2.27 3.57 0.00 7.14 0.00 0.74 0.00 1.42 1.06 1.97 2.80 5.14 3.96 2.87 0.98 4.18 4.55 7.14 0.00 21.43 6.82 6.62 1.73 3.56 3.89 3.95 AXL FAC 0.487 0.476 0.483 0.483 0.500 0.484 0.484 0.484 0.500 0.470 0.494 0.481 0.499 0.490 0.491 0.485 NEGDIR % SU % MU 2.76 1.95 DC04: Page 6 of 6 New Jersey Department of Transportation Route/Road Region-County From To Ref Marker End Milepost VALLEY ST - ESSEX End Date No. Days Counted No. of Lanes DOT ID Func. Class MC F1 2 VEHICLE CLASS AVG NUM AXLES 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-13 13-14 14-15 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 20-21 21-22 22-23 23-24 Classification Count Average Weekday Hourly Data Report Begin Date 05/15/2012 STATION HOUR 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 DIRECTION 11-12 East 12-13 13-14 14-15 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 20-21 21-22 22-23 23-24 CAR 2A-4T F2 F3 2 2 2 1 0 0 2 1 4 5 3 4 2 3 2 3 2 7 2 4 5 3 2 3 1 3 SINGLE UNIT BUS 2A-6T 3 A 4+ A F4 F5 F6 F7 2 2 3 4.5 05/17/2012 2 2 Maplewood Twp Taken By Processed By Batch ID 16-Urban Minor Arterial SINGLE TRAILER 4- A 5 A 6+ A F8 F9 F10 3.8 5 5.9 MULTI TRAILER 5- A 6 A 7+ A F11 F12 F13 TOTAL 4.9 6 7.5 % HV F4-F13 % TRK F3-F13 AXLE FACTOR 55 27 14 11 28 46 162 288 299 322 278 303 322 317 327 353 353 446 391 362 312 242 171 100 6 8 5 2 4 10 45 58 63 53 55 66 59 59 72 60 65 78 65 50 48 37 30 17 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 6 12 7 14 5 5 7 10 10 9 10 7 4 3 3 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 2 3 5 8 5 4 7 6 9 4 5 4 5 3 2 3 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 7 7 5 6 9 6 4 5 5 4 5 8 5 6 5 4 3 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 2 1 1 2 5 2 1 3 1 1 2 2 1 4 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 5 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 6 5 4 4 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 65 37 21 15 36 62 225 376 398 401 368 400 405 405 424 444 445 556 484 435 378 295 211 125 3.1 2.7 9.5 13.3 5.6 8.1 6.2 6.6 8.3 5.5 9.0 7.0 5.4 6.4 5.4 5.4 5.6 5.0 4.8 4.6 4.2 4.4 4.3 4.0 12.3 24.3 33.3 26.7 16.7 24.2 26.2 22.1 24.1 18.7 23.9 23.5 20.0 21.0 22.4 18.9 20.2 19.1 18.2 16.1 16.9 16.9 18.5 17.6 .99 .98 .96 .92 .94 .99 .98 .97 .97 .98 .96 .97 .98 .98 .98 .98 .97 .98 .98 .97 .98 .98 .98 .99 64 5529 128 11058 1015 2030 120 240 82 164 99 297 9 41 37 141 56 280 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7011 0 14379 5.7 20.2 .98 37 20 13 7 29 92 244 436 480 361 357 351 357 393 420 404 430 382 388 372 288 219 143 83 4 4 2 1 6 22 31 80 71 62 70 70 59 57 59 54 59 52 32 37 32 27 22 8 0 0 1 1 0 3 4 8 9 7 7 8 6 7 9 9 9 8 6 5 2 3 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 3 4 10 10 8 10 9 11 10 6 6 6 6 4 3 3 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 3 2 3 3 0 1 3 3 3 2 3 4 3 3 2 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 5 11 5 8 6 6 11 6 14 14 18 9 8 8 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 27 18 12 38 126 287 544 588 448 457 450 446 484 506 495 527 471 444 430 341 261 171 94 4.7 11.1 16.7 33.3 7.9 8.7 3.8 5.1 5.8 5.1 6.1 6.0 6.5 6.6 4.9 6.7 6.5 7.6 5.2 4.4 5.3 5.0 3.5 3.2 14.0 25.9 27.8 41.7 23.7 26.2 14.6 19.9 17.9 19.0 21.4 21.6 19.7 18.4 16.6 17.6 17.6 18.7 12.4 13.0 14.7 15.3 16.4 11.7 .97 .92 .95 .93 .99 .97 .99 .98 .97 .98 .97 .98 .97 .96 .98 .95 .96 .94 .97 .97 .96 .97 .97 .99 TOTAL VEHICLES TOTAL AXLES 33 6306 66 12612 921 1842 114 228 121 242 43 129 6 27 26 99 138 690 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7708 0 15935 5.8 17.8 .97 GRAND TOTAL VEHICLES GRAND TOTAL AXLES 97 11835 194 23670 1936 3872 234 468 203 406 142 426 15 68 63 240 194 970 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14719 0 30314 5.8 18.9 .97 TOTAL VEHICLES TOTAL AXLES 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-13 13-14 14-15 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 20-21 21-22 22-23 23-24 HOUR 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 DIRECTION 11-12 West 12-13 13-14 14-15 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 20-21 21-22 22-23 23-24 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 3 2 2 2 1 2 2 4 4 1 1 2 3 2 0 0 TRAFFIC FLOW BY DIRECTION DIRECTION East West TOTAL NUMBER OF VEHICLES 7011 7708 14719 NUMBER OF AXLES 14379 15935 30314 % HEAVY VEHICLES (F4-F13) 5.70% 5.80% 5.80% % TRUCKS & BUSES (F3-F13) 20.20% 17.80% 18.90% 600 NO. OF VEHICLES 500 400 300 AXLE CORRECTION FACTOR 0.98 0.97 0.97 200 PEAK HOUR DATA 100 DIRECTION HOUR COUNT 2-WAY HOUR COUNT East Created 07/19/2012 2:55:43PM 23-24 22-23 21-22 20-21 19-20 18-19 17-18 16-17 15-16 14-15 13-14 12-13 11-12 10-11 09-10 08-09 07-08 06-07 05-06 04-05 03-04 02-03 01-02 00-01 0 East 17-18 556 A.M. 08-09 986 West 08-09 588 P.M. 17-18 1027 West DC20:Page 1 of 1 New Jersey Department of Transportation 24 Hour Directional Summary, West Bound for Oct 19, 2015 3N5H705, , Valley Street-.17, 07000638__, Maplewood Twp FC16 ESSEX County Bet CO 630 Millburn Avenue and Rynda Road Total % Total 97.9 1.9 0.3 2.1 10,453.8 198.7 29.0 227.7 Private: Single: Combo: Trucks: Total: Peak % Peak 848.0 19.7 97.5 2.3 0.2 2.5 1.7 21.3 869.3 10,682.0 8 0.99 Peak Hour: Axle Factor: 1000 800 600 400 200 0 00 01 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Total % 02 03 VOL 41.0 22.7 16.7 18.3 44.3 132.3 319.7 755.0 869.3 677.7 548.0 552.0 639.0 661.7 700.3 816.7 854.0 813.0 704.3 563.7 388.0 292.7 162.3 89.3 10,682.0 100.0 04 05 MC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.3 1.7 1.3 2.0 0.5 0 1.0 0.3 1.7 1.0 2.0 2.3 0.3 0 0.3 0.3 0.3 15.5 0.1 06 CAR 38.3 22.3 15.7 15.3 37.7 121.7 289.3 680.0 779.7 602.0 478.5 479.5 565.0 580.0 628.3 741.7 788.3 758.3 655.7 544.0 370.3 281.7 157.3 86.3 9,717.0 91.0 Created 03/15/2016 6:06:13PM 07 08 PU 2.3 0.3 1.0 2.3 3.0 6.0 19.0 57.0 66.7 55.3 47.5 55.0 53.5 61.3 53.7 57.7 50.7 44.3 41.0 14.0 15.3 9.0 4.0 1.3 721.3 6.8 09 BUS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 10 11 2D 0 0 0 0 1.3 2.7 6.7 10.0 9.0 12.0 8.0 9.0 12.0 12.7 10.3 8.3 10.3 6.7 3.7 4.7 1.3 0.7 0.7 1.0 131.0 1.2 12 SU 3 0 0 0 0.7 2.3 1.0 2.3 4.7 8.7 3.7 6.5 2.5 2.5 3.3 3.3 3.7 1.0 0.7 0 0.3 0.3 0 0 0.3 47.8 0.4 13 14 15 SU 4+ ST 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.3 0 0 0.3 1.0 2.0 0.3 1.3 0.3 4.0 0 3.0 1.0 3.5 0.5 1.3 1.0 2.7 0.3 1.3 0 0.3 0.3 0 0.3 0 0 0 0 0 0.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.8 6.2 0.2 0.1 16 17 18 19 20 ST 5 ST 6+ MT 50.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.7 0 0 2.3 0 0 1.7 0 0 1.3 0 0 1.7 0 0 1.5 0 0 1.0 0 0 2.0 0 0 1.0 0 0 1.3 0 0 2.3 0 0 2.0 0 0 0.7 0 0 1.7 0 0 0.3 0 0 0 0 0 1.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.8 0 0 0.2 0 0 21 22 MT 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 MT 7+ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DC11: Page 1 of 1 New Jersey Department of Transportation 24 Hour Roadway Summary for Oct 19, 2015 3N5H705, , Valley Street-.17, 07000638__, Maplewood Twp FC16 ESSEX County Bet CO 630 Millburn Avenue and Rynda Road Total % Total 97.9 1.9 0.3 2.1 20,493.5 388.5 58.2 446.7 Private: Single: Combo: Trucks: Total: Peak % Peak 1,699.3 13.3 99.1 0.8 0.1 0.9 2.3 15.7 1,715.3 20,943.7 17 0.99 Peak Hour: Axle Factor: 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 00 01 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Total % 02 03 VOL 96.0 48.0 31.0 29.3 76.3 232.3 650.3 1,362.3 1,542.0 1,274.7 1,116.5 1,108.0 1,229.5 1,268.7 1,336.3 1,508.7 1,678.7 1,715.3 1,494.0 1,169.3 805.3 602.3 346.3 222.3 20,943.7 100.0 04 05 06 MC CAR 0 89.7 0 45.7 0 27.0 0 24.0 0 63.0 1.0 207.3 0 575.3 1.3 1,211.0 2.3 1,362.0 1.7 1,111.7 2.0 966.0 0.5 954.0 1.0 1,078.0 1.3 1,119.0 0.7 1,199.3 2.0 1,368.7 2.3 1,553.0 4.0 1,605.7 4.7 1,399.7 0.7 1,121.7 0.3 774.0 0.3 581.0 0.3 337.0 1.0 213.0 27.5 18,986.7 0.1 90.7 Created 03/15/2016 6:06:27PM 07 08 PU 6.0 2.3 3.0 3.7 6.0 13.0 52.7 111.0 140.3 117.0 109.0 117.0 112.0 113.7 105.0 106.3 102.3 89.7 75.0 36.0 27.3 17.3 7.7 6.0 1,479.3 7.1 09 BUS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 0.3 2.3 0.3 0 0 0 0 3.5 0 10 11 2D 0 0 0 0.7 2.3 5.7 12.0 19.7 17.0 26.0 18.5 18.0 21.0 22.0 16.0 16.7 16.0 12.3 8.7 9.3 1.3 2.0 1.0 1.0 247.2 1.2 12 SU 3 0 0 0.7 0.7 4.7 3.0 6.7 11.0 13.7 9.7 12.5 9.5 8.5 8.0 8.0 7.7 1.7 1.0 0.7 0.3 0.7 0 0 1.3 109.8 0.5 13 14 15 SU 4+ ST 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.3 0 0.3 0 0.7 0 0 3.3 1.3 2.7 0.3 3.0 1.0 5.5 1.0 5.0 1.5 5.0 1.5 1.3 1.7 3.3 1.3 2.0 0.7 0.3 0.3 0 0.7 0 0.7 0 0.3 0 0.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 31.5 14.3 0.2 0.1 16 17 18 19 20 ST 5 ST 6+ MT 50.3 0 0 0 0 0 0.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.7 0 0 3.7 0 0 3.7 0 0 3.7 0 0 4.7 0 0 2.0 0 0 2.0 0 0 2.5 0 0 1.7 0 0 2.3 0.3 0 4.7 0 0 2.7 0 0 1.7 0 0 2.3 0 0 0.7 0 0 1.0 0 0 1.7 0 0 0.3 0 0 0 0 0 43.5 0.3 0 0.2 0 0 21 22 MT 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 MT 7+ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DC11: Page 1 of 1 New Jersey Department of Transportation 24 Hour Directional Summary, East Bound for Oct 19, 2015 3N5H705, , Valley Street-.17, 07000638__, Maplewood Twp FC16 ESSEX County Bet CO 630 Millburn Avenue and Rynda Road Total % Total 97.8 1.8 0.3 2.1 10,039.7 189.8 29.2 219.0 Private: Single: Combo: Trucks: Total: Peak % Peak 894.7 6.0 99.2 0.7 0.1 0.8 1.3 7.3 902.3 10,261.7 17 0.99 Peak Hour: Axle Factor: 1000 800 600 400 200 0 00 01 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Total % 02 03 VOL 55.0 25.3 14.3 11.0 32.0 100.0 330.7 607.3 672.7 597.0 568.5 556.0 590.5 607.0 636.0 692.0 824.7 902.3 789.7 605.7 417.3 309.7 184.0 133.0 10,261.7 100.0 04 05 MC 0 0 0 0 0 1.0 0 1.0 0.7 0.3 0 0 1.0 0.3 0.3 0.3 1.3 2.0 2.3 0.3 0.3 0 0 0.7 12.0 0.1 06 CAR 51.3 23.3 11.3 8.7 25.3 85.7 286.0 531.0 582.3 509.7 487.5 474.5 513.0 539.0 571.0 627.0 764.7 847.3 744.0 577.7 403.7 299.3 179.7 126.7 9,269.7 90.3 Created 03/15/2016 6:06:20PM 07 08 PU 3.7 2.0 2.0 1.3 3.0 7.0 33.7 54.0 73.7 61.7 61.5 62.0 58.5 52.3 51.3 48.7 51.7 45.3 34.0 22.0 12.0 8.3 3.7 4.7 758.0 7.4 09 BUS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.3 2.3 0.3 0 0 0 0 3.0 0 10 11 2D 0 0 0 0.7 1.0 3.0 5.3 9.7 8.0 14.0 10.5 9.0 9.0 9.3 5.7 8.3 5.7 5.7 5.0 4.7 0 1.3 0.3 0 116.2 1.1 12 SU 3 0 0 0.7 0 2.3 2.0 4.3 6.3 5.0 6.0 6.0 7.0 6.0 4.7 4.7 4.0 0.7 0.3 0.7 0 0.3 0 0 1.0 62.0 0.6 13 14 15 SU 4+ ST 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.3 0 0.3 0 0.3 0 0 3.0 0.3 0.7 0 1.7 0.7 1.5 1.0 2.0 0.5 1.5 1.0 0 0.7 0.7 1.0 0.7 0.7 0 0 0 0.3 0 0.7 0 0.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.7 8.2 0.1 0.1 16 17 ST 5 0 0 0.3 0 0 1.0 1.3 2.0 2.3 3.0 0.5 1.0 0.5 0.7 1.0 2.3 0.7 1.0 0.7 0.3 1.0 0.7 0.3 0 20.7 0.2 18 19 ST 6+ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.3 0 20 MT 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 22 MT 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 MT 7+ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DC11: Page 1 of 1 New Jersey Department of Transportation Route/Road Region-County From To Ref Marker End Milepost End Date No. Days Counted No. of Lanes DOT ID Func. Class MC F1 2 VEHICLE CLASS AVG NUM AXLES 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 1-12 12-13 13-14 14-15 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 20-21 21-22 22-23 23-24 Classification Count Average Weekday Hourly Data Report Begin Date 10/19/2015 STATION Valley Street - ESSEX HOUR 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 DIRECTION 11-12 East 12-13 13-14 14-15 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 20-21 21-22 22-23 23-24 CAR 2A-4T F2 F3 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 1 SINGLE UNIT BUS 2A-6T 3 A 4+ A F4 F5 F6 F7 2 2 3 4.5 10/22/2015 3 2 Maplewood Twp Taken By Processed By Batch ID 16-Urban Minor Arterial SINGLE TRAILER 4- A 5 A 6+ A F8 F9 F10 3.8 5 5.9 MULTI TRAILER 5- A 6 A 7+ A F11 F12 F13 TOTAL 4.9 6 7.5 % HV F4-F13 % TRK F3-F13 AXLE FACTOR 51 23 11 9 25 86 286 531 582 510 488 475 513 539 571 627 765 847 744 578 404 299 180 127 4 2 2 1 3 7 34 54 74 62 62 62 59 52 51 49 52 45 34 22 12 8 4 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 3 5 10 8 14 11 9 9 9 6 8 6 6 5 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 2 4 6 5 6 6 7 6 5 5 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 2 2 2 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 2 3 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 55 25 14 11 31 100 330 607 673 598 571 557 592 607 636 692 826 901 790 605 417 309 184 134 0.0 0.0 7.1 9.1 9.7 6.0 3.0 3.5 2.4 4.3 3.7 3.6 3.2 2.6 2.2 2.3 1.0 .8 1.3 .8 .2 .6 0.0 .7 7.3 8.0 21.4 18.2 19.4 13.0 13.3 12.4 13.4 14.7 14.5 14.7 13.2 11.2 10.2 9.4 7.3 5.8 5.6 4.5 3.1 3.2 2.2 4.5 1 1 .97 1 .97 .98 .99 .98 .99 .98 .99 .99 .99 .99 .99 .99 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 9271 20 18542 760 1520 2 4 117 234 62 186 14 63 8 30 21 105 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10265 0 20704 2.2 9.6 .99 38 22 16 15 38 122 289 680 780 602 479 480 565 580 628 742 788 758 656 544 370 282 157 86 2 0 1 2 3 6 19 57 67 55 48 55 54 61 54 58 51 44 41 14 15 9 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 7 10 9 12 8 9 12 13 10 8 10 7 4 5 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 2 1 2 5 9 4 7 3 3 3 3 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 4 3 4 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 22 17 18 44 133 319 755 870 677 550 554 641 661 699 817 853 813 705 563 387 293 162 88 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.6 6.8 3.8 3.4 2.4 2.4 2.8 3.8 3.2 3.4 2.9 2.4 1.8 1.5 1.1 .9 .9 .5 .7 .6 1.1 5.0 0.0 5.9 16.7 13.6 8.3 9.4 9.9 10.1 10.9 12.5 13.2 11.9 12.1 10.2 8.9 7.5 6.5 6.7 3.4 4.4 3.8 3.1 2.3 1 1 1 .97 .98 .99 .99 .99 .99 .99 .98 .99 .98 .99 .99 .99 1 1 1 1 1 .99 1 1 TOTAL VEHICLES TOTAL AXLES 14 9717 28 19434 721 1442 1 2 132 264 49 147 19 86 5 19 23 115 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10681 0 21537 2.1 8.9 .99 GRAND TOTAL VEHICLES GRAND TOTAL AXLES 24 18988 48 37976 1481 2962 3 6 249 498 111 333 33 149 13 49 44 220 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20946 0 42241 2.2 9.2 .99 TOTAL VEHICLES TOTAL AXLES 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 1-12 12-13 13-14 14-15 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 20-21 21-22 22-23 23-24 HOUR 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 DIRECTION 11-12 West 12-13 13-14 14-15 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 20-21 21-22 22-23 23-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 2 1 0 1 0 2 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 TRAFFIC FLOW BY DIRECTION DIRECTION East West TOTAL NUMBER OF VEHICLES 10265 10681 20946 NUMBER OF AXLES 20704 21537 42241 % HEAVY VEHICLES (F4-F13) 2.20% 2.10% 2.20% % TRUCKS & BUSES (F3-F13) 9.60% 8.90% 9.20% AXLE CORRECTION FACTOR 0.99 0.99 0.99 1000 NO. OF VEHICLES 800 600 400 PEAK HOUR DATA 200 DIRECTION HOUR COUNT 2-WAY HOUR COUNT East Created 03/11/2016 5:34:09PM 23-24 22-23 21-22 20-21 19-20 18-19 17-18 16-17 15-16 14-15 13-14 12-13 11-12 10-11 09-10 08-09 07-08 06-07 05-06 04-05 03-04 02-03 01-02 00-01 0 East 17-18 901 A.M. 08-09 1543 West 08-09 870 P.M. 17-18 1714 West DC20:Page 1 of 1 New Jersey Department of Transportation Daily Volume from 10/19/2015 through 10/22/2015 Site Names: County: Funct. Class: Location: 3N5H705, , Valley Street-.17, 07000638__, Maplewood Twp ESSEX Urban Minor Arterial Bet CO 630 Millburn Avenue and Rynda Road Sun 10/18/2015 ROAD W E 00:00 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 07:00 08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 Volume AM Peak Vol AM Peak Fct AM Peak Hr PM Peak Vol PM Peak Fct PM Peak Hr Seasonal Fct Daily Fct Axle Fct Pulse Fct Mon 10/19/2015 ROAD W E 1,227 1,361 1,547 1,659 1,749 1,489 1,153 717 558 320 212 11,992 636 720 850 835 823 701 550 341 262 151 89 5,958 591 641 697 824 926 788 603 376 296 169 123 6,034 0.985 0.939 0.500 2.000 0.985 0.939 0.500 2.000 0.985 0.939 0.500 2.000 Seasonal Factor Group: Daily Factor Group: Axle Factor Group: Growth Factor Group: RG1_FC16 RG1_FC16 RG1_FC16 RG1_FC16 Tue 10/20/2015 Wed 10/21/2015 Thu 10/22/2015 Fri 10/23/2015 ROAD W E ROAD W E ROAD W E ROAD W E 86 35 51 88 39 49 114 49 65 36 16 20 54 23 31 54 29 25 28 15 13 30 15 15 35 20 15 33 22 11 30 17 13 25 16 9 70 42 28 87 52 35 72 39 33 245 136 109 223 126 97 229 135 94 629 307 322 649 312 337 673 340 333 1,345 728 617 1,385 796 589 1,359 742 617 1,610 911 699 1,556 854 702 1,463 846 617 1,298 696 602 1,265 674 591 1,261 663 598 1,173 578 595 1,060 518 542 1,126 573 553 1,091 532 559 1,265 673 592 1,195 606 589 1,294 670 624 1,286 679 607 1,330 702 628 1,319 680 639 1,485 782 703 1,494 818 676 1,738 922 816 1,640 806 834 1,734 829 905 1,665 787 878 1,501 691 810 1,495 721 774 1,188 597 591 1,168 545 623 890 434 456 809 389 420 590 267 323 659 349 310 371 175 196 348 161 187 225 88 137 230 91 139 21,290 10,889 10,401 20,826 10,590 10,236 5,285 2,879 2,406 1,610 911 699 1,556 854 702 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 8:00 8:00 8:00 8:00 8:00 8:00 1,738 922 905 1,665 818 878 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 16:00 16:00 17:00 17:00 15:00 17:00 0.985 0.985 0.985 0.985 0.985 0.985 0.985 0.985 0.985 0.889 0.889 0.889 0.893 0.893 0.893 0.889 0.889 0.889 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 Sat 10/24/2015 ROAD W E Collected by: NJDOT Created 03/11/2016 3:59:17PM ROAD AADT 18,571 W AADT 9,470 E AADT 9,101 DV03: Page 1 of 1 New Jersey Department of Transportation Daily % Class Distribution for 10/19/2015 through 10/22/2015 (69 hours) Site Names: County: Funct. Class: Location: 3N5H705, , Valley Street-.17, 07000638__, Maplewood Twp ESSEX Urban Minor Arterial Bet CO 630 Millburn Avenue and Rynda Road MC CAR PU BUS 2D SU 3 SU 4+ ST 4ST 5 ST 6+ MT 5MT 6 MT 7+ UNCLS Trucks Combo Trucks Classified % Unclassified Volume Created on: Seasonal Factor Group: Daily Factor Group: Axle Factor Group: Growth Factor Group: RG1_FC16 RG1_FC16 RG1_FC16 RG1_FC16 Roadway Neg DIR Pos DIR 0.13 0.15 0.12 90.86 91.13 90.57 6.90 6.62 7.19 0.02 0.00 0.03 1.15 1.20 1.10 0.50 0.44 0.57 0.13 0.16 0.10 0.07 0.06 0.08 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.02 2.06 2.06 2.06 0.28 0.27 0.29 99.97 99.97 99.98 0.03 0.03 0.02 59,393 30,316 29,077 3/11/2016 4:17:31PM DC02 Page 1 of 1 New Jersey Department of Transportation Daily Volume from 05/14/2012 through 05/16/2012 Site Names: County: Funct. Class: Location: 3N5H708, , BAKER ST-.72, 07111792__, Maplewood Twp ESSEX Urban Collector BET DUNNELL RD & VALLEY ST Sun 05/13/2012 ROAD W E 00:00 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 07:00 08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 Volume AM Peak Vol AM Peak Fct AM Peak Hr PM Peak Vol PM Peak Fct PM Peak Hr Seasonal Fct Daily Fct Axle Fct Pulse Fct Mon 05/14/2012 ROAD W E 332 421 491 435 511 552 405 266 306 99 59 3,877 147 183 202 183 183 217 156 94 109 26 21 1,521 185 238 289 252 328 335 249 172 197 73 38 2,356 0.969 1.055 0.500 2.000 0.969 1.055 0.500 2.000 0.969 1.055 0.500 2.000 Seasonal Factor Group: Daily Factor Group: Axle Factor Group: Growth Factor Group: Tue 05/15/2012 Wed 05/16/2012 Thu 05/17/2012 ROAD W E ROAD W E ROAD W E 27 10 17 28 11 17 23 8 15 18 5 13 7 2 5 4 2 2 5 4 1 6 4 2 10 6 4 12 7 5 40 19 21 43 24 19 125 53 72 133 51 82 455 239 216 429 232 197 592 301 291 581 257 324 398 185 213 336 179 157 362 169 193 375 190 185 338 146 192 410 195 215 378 184 194 369 189 180 338 151 187 430 190 240 523 217 306 456 206 250 473 170 303 528 190 338 362 146 216 288 83 205 166 53 113 127 38 89 44 18 26 6,495 2,788 3,707 2,375 1,157 1,218 646 329 331 632 300 355 0.68 0.67 0.73 0.67 0.74 0.66 7:45 7:15 7:30 7:45 7:15 7:45 537 223 343 0.91 0.82 0.73 14:45 14:30 17:30 0.969 0.969 0.969 0.969 0.969 0.969 0.956 0.956 0.956 0.934 0.934 0.934 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 2 Urban Other Roadways 2 Urban Other Roadways Fri 05/18/2012 ROAD W E Sat 05/19/2012 ROAD W E Collected by: NJDOT Created 07/13/2012 12:11:10PM ROAD AADT 6,232 W AADT 2,678 E AADT 3,554 DV03: Page 1 of 1 New Jersey Department of Transportation Daily Volume from 12/15/2015 through 12/17/2015 Site Names: County: Funct. Class: Location: 3N5H708, , Baker Street-.83, 07111792__, Maplewood Twp ESSEX Urban Collector Bet Burnet Street and CO 638 Valley Street Sun 12/13/2015 ROAD W E 00:00 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 07:00 08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 Volume AM Peak Vol AM Peak Fct AM Peak Hr PM Peak Vol PM Peak Fct PM Peak Hr Seasonal Fct Daily Fct Axle Fct Pulse Fct Mon 12/14/2015 ROAD W E Seasonal Factor Group: Daily Factor Group: Axle Factor Group: Growth Factor Group: Tue 12/15/2015 ROAD W E 363 412 375 422 461 604 545 582 526 420 246 203 137 5,296 189 201 193 188 201 270 234 210 216 173 66 53 34 2,228 174 211 182 234 260 334 311 372 310 247 180 150 103 3,068 624 0.89 18:15 0.970 0.926 0.490 2.000 270 0.81 16:00 0.970 0.926 0.490 2.000 394 0.93 18:15 0.970 0.926 0.490 2.000 RG1_FC17 RG1_FC17 RG1_FC17 RG1_FC17 Wed 12/16/2015 Thu 12/17/2015 Fri 12/18/2015 ROAD W E ROAD W E ROAD W E 70 12 58 124 21 103 38 11 27 35 7 28 14 4 10 22 7 15 4 1 3 2 1 1 4 2 2 7 4 3 18 7 11 14 8 6 48 21 27 43 22 21 176 100 76 179 91 88 471 251 220 459 238 221 543 262 281 554 276 278 329 171 158 381 196 185 370 193 177 394 204 190 418 203 215 363 152 211 427 198 229 556 228 328 543 247 296 606 260 346 555 223 332 495 235 260 304 128 176 253 65 188 143 31 112 7,142 3,209 3,933 1,820 871 949 606 292 314 0.75 0.81 0.70 8:45 8:45 8:45 624 270 362 0.99 0.87 0.96 17:45 17:45 18:15 0.970 0.970 0.970 0.970 0.970 0.970 1.097 1.097 1.097 0.887 0.887 0.887 0.490 0.490 0.490 0.490 0.490 0.490 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 Sat 12/19/2015 ROAD W E Collected by: NJDOT Created 03/11/2016 3:45:25PM ROAD AADT 6,822 W AADT 3,021 E AADT 3,801 DV03: Page 1 of 1 New Jersey Department of Transportation Daily Volume from 07/10/2012 through 07/12/2012 Site Names: County: Funct. Class: Location: 090721, , RT 510, South Orange-24.5, 00000510__, South Orange Twp ESSEX Urban Principal Arterial - Other Bet Vose St and Village Place Sun 07/08/2012 ROAD W E 00:00 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 07:00 08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 Volume AM Peak Vol AM Peak Fct AM Peak Hr PM Peak Vol PM Peak Fct PM Peak Hr Seasonal Fct Daily Fct Axle Fct Pulse Fct Mon 07/09/2012 ROAD W E Tue 07/10/2012 ROAD W E 1,024 1,012 1,051 1,166 1,191 1,232 1,245 1,109 879 831 541 376 11,657 505 484 490 515 514 535 561 442 335 266 206 85 4,938 519 528 561 651 677 697 684 667 544 565 335 291 6,719 1,261 0.98 17:45 1.000 1.000 0.500 2.000 561 0.87 18:00 1.000 1.000 0.500 2.000 708 0.95 17:30 1.000 1.000 0.500 2.000 Seasonal Factor Group: Daily Factor Group: Axle Factor Group: Growth Factor Group: 2 Urban Other Roadways Wed 07/11/2012 Thu 07/12/2012 Fri 07/13/2012 ROAD W E ROAD W E ROAD W E 174 42 132 114 43 71 76 22 54 59 26 33 35 16 19 36 18 18 34 19 15 31 16 15 63 33 30 40 26 14 155 110 45 148 111 37 479 289 190 445 313 132 838 422 416 721 458 263 1,067 573 494 899 539 360 986 486 500 951 489 462 697 421 276 776 435 341 684 422 262 681 440 241 697 471 226 725 473 252 734 466 268 741 455 286 800 465 335 822 501 321 762 506 256 733 449 284 607 314 293 503 267 236 386 194 192 233 97 136 13,031 7,513 5,518 4,220 2,474 1,746 1,076 573 516 962 550 462 0.96 0.97 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.95 8:15 8:00 8:30 8:45 7:30 9:00 823 526 355 0.93 0.96 0.91 16:45 16:45 15:45 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 Sat 07/14/2012 ROAD W E Collected by: NJDOT Created 09/27/2012 11:04:31AM ROAD AADT 14,795 W AADT 7,683 E AADT 7,112 DV03: Page 1 of 1 New Jersey Department of Transportation Daily Volume from 01/16/2012 through 01/19/2012 Site Names: County: Funct. Class: Location: 110738, , Millburn Avenue-1, 07000630__, Maplewood Twp ESSEX Urban Principal Arterial - Other Bet Melman Terrace and Mildred Terrace Sun 01/15/2012 ROAD W E 00:00 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 07:00 08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 Volume AM Peak Vol AM Peak Fct AM Peak Hr PM Peak Vol PM Peak Fct PM Peak Hr Seasonal Fct Daily Fct Axle Fct Pulse Fct Mon 01/16/2012 ROAD W E 491 500 508 512 508 364 268 163 118 98 70 3,600 250 249 248 222 192 139 121 68 44 46 26 1,605 241 251 260 290 316 225 147 95 74 52 44 1,995 1.078 0.937 0.487 2.000 1.078 0.937 0.487 2.000 1.078 0.937 0.487 2.000 Seasonal Factor Type: Daily Factor Type: Axle Factor Type: Growth Factor Type: 2 Urban Other Roadways 2 Urban Other Roadways 14 Tue 01/17/2012 Wed 01/18/2012 Thu 01/19/2012 Fri 01/20/2012 ROAD W E ROAD W E ROAD W E ROAD W E 15 9 6 33 15 18 40 15 25 10 5 5 20 10 10 11 7 4 1 0 1 12 7 5 10 4 6 13 8 5 9 4 5 10 4 6 36 18 18 32 21 11 29 17 12 67 41 26 66 34 32 64 37 27 181 124 57 183 119 64 188 117 71 394 247 147 385 257 128 404 255 149 618 391 227 570 359 211 625 382 243 504 263 241 450 215 235 469 265 204 404 211 193 364 177 187 451 234 217 440 218 222 398 198 200 474 237 237 435 203 232 476 236 240 531 294 237 499 242 257 461 224 237 496 226 270 510 236 274 523 248 275 525 237 288 606 251 355 551 237 314 638 236 402 623 240 383 480 188 292 450 176 274 329 137 192 292 123 169 167 63 104 217 88 129 170 77 93 155 66 89 96 38 58 115 38 77 66 28 38 71 24 47 7,188 3,472 3,716 6,968 3,341 3,627 3,306 1,868 1,438 618 391 241 576 359 243 625 384 248 0.93 0.98 0.80 0.96 0.94 0.79 0.93 0.91 0.91 8:00 8:00 9:00 8:15 8:00 8:30 8:00 7:45 8:15 643 258 407 623 255 383 0.88 0.90 0.93 0.92 0.92 0.92 16:30 15:45 17:15 17:00 16:30 17:00 1.078 1.078 1.078 1.078 1.078 1.078 1.078 1.078 1.078 0.911 0.911 0.911 0.964 0.964 0.964 0.974 0.974 0.974 0.487 0.487 0.487 0.487 0.487 0.487 0.487 0.487 0.487 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 Sat 01/21/2012 ROAD W E Collected by: NJDOT Created 03/06/2012 2:32:49PM ROAD AADT 6,950 W AADT 3,397 E AADT 3,553 DV03: Page 1 of 1 New Jersey Department of Transportation Daily Volume from 03/08/2012 through 03/10/2012 Site Names: County: Funct. Class: Location: 110748, , Valley St-1.95, 07000638__, South Orange Twp ESSEX Urban Minor Arterial Bet 4th St and 3rd St Sun 03/04/2012 ROAD S N Mon 03/05/2012 ROAD S N Tue 03/06/2012 ROAD S N Seasonal Factor Group: Daily Factor Group: Axle Factor Group: Growth Factor Group: Wed 03/07/2012 ROAD S N 00:00 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 07:00 08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 Volume AM Peak Vol AM Peak Fct AM Peak Hr PM Peak Vol PM Peak Fct PM Peak Hr Seasonal Fct Daily Fct Axle Fct Pulse Fct Thu 03/08/2012 ROAD S N 1,018 911 857 913 1,200 1,163 1,110 1,219 1,116 954 728 619 458 12,266 555 484 459 444 624 726 688 683 642 523 361 318 196 6,703 463 427 398 469 576 437 422 536 474 431 367 301 262 5,563 1,224 0.97 18:15 1.011 0.935 0.500 2.000 726 0.86 16:00 1.011 0.935 0.500 2.000 576 0.94 15:00 1.011 0.935 0.500 2.000 2 Urban Other Roadways 2 Urban Other Roadways Fri 03/09/2012 Sat 03/10/2012 ROAD S N ROAD S N 283 169 114 127 63 64 132 88 44 71 43 28 65 36 29 50 32 18 31 17 14 31 21 10 47 29 18 52 33 19 143 77 66 118 72 46 332 180 152 331 178 153 862 449 413 841 461 380 1,208 656 552 1,174 656 518 931 526 405 899 512 387 916 478 438 877 483 394 954 534 420 972 616 356 986 650 336 1,101 713 388 1,215 772 443 1,182 737 445 1,278 771 507 1,249 711 538 959 567 392 743 423 320 679 337 342 428 225 203 258 110 148 16,954 9,871 7,083 3,694 2,071 1,623 1,208 656 557 0.91 0.85 0.99 8:00 8:00 7:45 1,326 786 549 0.91 0.98 0.88 17:30 15:15 17:30 1.011 1.011 1.011 1.011 1.011 1.011 0.876 0.876 0.876 1.081 1.081 1.081 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 Collected by: NJDOT Created 06/28/2012 3:05:24PM ROAD AADT 15,803 S AADT 8,935 N AADT 6,868 DV03: Page 1 of 1 Appendix D – Vehicular Crash Diagrams COLLISION DIAGRAM DATA M I LL B U RN DAY DATE NO. SURFACE INJURED CONDITION LIGHT CONDITION 3 12 12:54 08:22 MON FRI 01-13-14 02-21-14 0 0 DRY WET CLEAR RAIN DAY DAY 10:11 16:24 20:02 THU SAT SUN 03-20-14 04-05-14 05-17-14 0 1 0 DRY DRY DRY CLEAR CLEAR CLEAR DAY DAY DAY 61 81 85 95 18:57 23:23 11:47 13:12 MON WED SAT SAT 09-15-14 02-11-15 02-21-15 05-02-15 0 1 0 DRY DRY DRY CLEAR CLEAR CLEAR DAY DARK DAY 104 109 17:58 15:53 THU WED 05-14-15 06-03-15 0 1 0 DRY DRY DRY CLEAR CLEAR CLEAR DAY DAY DAY 118 145 152 09:07 17:18 08:45 WED SUN WED 07-22-15 12-27-15 02-10-16 0 2 0 DRY WET DRY CLEAR RAIN OVERCAST DAY DARK 159 189 09:15 17:17 FRI WED 04-01-16 11-30-16 0 0 DRY WET OVERCAST OVERCAST DAY DAY DARK 194 197 11:14 22:00 FRI THU 12-09-16 12-15-16 0 0 DRY DRY CLEAR CLEAR DAY DARK 36 0) 159 61 95 109 145 194 189 104 85 22 3 VAL L E YS T( C R6 3 8 ) 81 NE LI 118 152 M U LB IL N R E V A TI ME: ) 0 6 3 11: 44: 23 AM R (C 3/ 12/ 2018 LEGEND NUMBER OF CRASHES WITH 1 TYPES OF CRASHES SYMBOLS COLORS NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MOVING VEHICLE GREENMAN-PEDERSEN,I NC. M A TC H 21 36 12 4 1 .2 O F EET NO SEE SH A 197 CE RA TER DATE: WEATHER 21 22 36 LLA VI L: \2017659 HSI P Pr ogr am TIME ) 8 3 R6 C T( YS E L VAL E AV FI LE: ( CR IEW TV ES CR and Pr oj ectDevel opmentSuppor t \NJDOT HSI P Year1\CaddHwy\03 Essex\CADD\Sheet s\Sheet -01. dgn A V E NO. PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY 14 INJURIES 4 FATALITIES 0 0 TOTAL NO. OF CRASHES 18 REAR END NON-INVOLVED VEHICLE HEAD ON PEDESTRIAN / BICYCLIST X 0 CR 638 (Valley Street) BACKING VEHICLE FATAL CRASH FIXED OBJECT ANIMAL NON-FIXED OBJECT POTHOLE Maplewood & S. Orange Townships, Essex County 0 2014 CRASHES OUT OF CONTROL 0 2015 CRASHES OVERTURNED 0 2016 CRASHES PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY CRASH INJURY IN CRASH between Millburn Avenue and S. Orange Avenue RIGHT ANGLE SIDE SWIPE 0 LEFT TURN 2014 - 2016 COLLISION DIAGRAMS Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. GPI Engineering and Construction Services NOT TO SCALE COLLISION DIAGRAM DATA NO. TIME DAY DATE NO. SURFACE INJURED CONDITION WEATHER LIGHT CONDITION FRI TUE 01-31-14 03-18-14 0 0 DRY DRY CLEAR CLEAR DAY DAY 11:04 17:29 08:53 WED TUE FRI 06-25-14 07-15-14 05-29-15 0 2 0 DRY WET DRY CLEAR RAIN CLEAR DAY DAY DAY 121 138 16:03 11:06 THU SAT 08-27-15 11-28-15 0 0 DRY DRY CLEAR OVERCAST DAY DAY 147 155 162 17:07 18:53 17:12 THU TUE THU 01-14-16 02-23-16 04-07-16 0 0 0 DRY WET DRY CLEAR RAIN CLEAR DARK DAY DAY 163 165 171 07:35 12:13 18:11 SAT TUE WED 177 178 16:28 16:52 THU SAT 04-09-16 04-26-16 05-25-16 07-14-16 0 0 1 0 DRY DRY DRY WET CLEAR CLEAR CLEAR OVERCAST DAY DAY DAY DAY 181 183 05:50 09:54 THU TUE 07-30-16 09-01-16 0 0 WET WET RAIN RAIN DAY DARK 09-13-16 1 DRY CLEAR DAY N 09:29 16:19 47 52 106 SO ER PI 8 20 M A TC H 178 183 NE B LI 47 1 4 2 5 1 H LI NE A 4 OF 1 T NO .3 SEE SHEE 177 138 SEE S HEET NO .1O F 165 171 147 155 8 106 M A TC 162 20 ) 8 3 R6 C ( T S Y E L VAL 121 163 S RD L: \2017659 HSI P Pr ogr am RD FI LE: N A SO ER PI IEW DV OA BR ND RY and Pr oj ectDevel opmentSuppor t \NJDOT HSI P Year1\CaddHwy\03 Essex\CADD\Sheet s\Sheet -02. dgn RD 52 TI ME: 11: 43: 54 AM E AV DATE: 3/ 12/ 2018 LEGEND NUMBER OF CRASHES WITH 1 TYPES OF CRASHES SYMBOLS COLORS NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION GREENMAN-PEDERSEN,I NC. MOVING VEHICLE PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY 14 INJURIES 3 FATALITIES 0 0 TOTAL NO. OF CRASHES 17 REAR END NON-INVOLVED VEHICLE HEAD ON PEDESTRIAN / BICYCLIST X 0 CR 638 (Valley Street) BACKING VEHICLE FATAL CRASH FIXED OBJECT ANIMAL NON-FIXED OBJECT POTHOLE Maplewood & S. Orange Townships, Essex County 0 2014 CRASHES OUT OF CONTROL 0 2015 CRASHES OVERTURNED 0 2016 CRASHES PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY CRASH INJURY IN CRASH between Millburn Avenue and S. Orange Avenue RIGHT ANGLE SIDE SWIPE 0 LEFT TURN 2014 - 2016 COLLISION DIAGRAMS Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. GPI Engineering and Construction Services NOT TO SCALE COLLISION DIAGRAM DATA NO. TIME DAY DATE NO. SURFACE INJURED CONDITION WEATHER LIGHT CONDITION ON RS PIE 7 82 18:34 05:30 THU SUN 01-30-14 02-15-15 0 0 DRY SNOWY CLEAR SNOW DARK DARK 102 137 139 13:46 15:11 16:24 THU WED MON 05-07-15 11-25-15 11-30-15 0 0 0 DRY DRY DRY CLEAR CLEAR CLEAR DAY DAY DAY 176 05:48 SUN 07-03-16 0 DRY CLEAR DAWN RD 102 4 F 1 .4 O T NO SHEE SEE NE C I VAL L E YS T( C R6 3 8 ) 176 H L 82 M SO M TI ME: 11: 43: 21AM FI LE: L: \2017659 HSI P Pr ogr am AVE ER and Pr oj ectDevel opmentSuppor t \NJDOT HSI P Year1\CaddHwy\03 Essex\CADD\Sheet s\Sheet -03. dgn 139 137 VE K A PAR M ATCH LI NE B SEE SHEET NO .2 O F 1 4 M A TC 7 3 DATE: 3/ 12/ 2018 LEGEND NUMBER OF CRASHES WITH 14 TYPES OF CRASHES SYMBOLS COLORS NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION GREENMAN-PEDERSEN,I NC. MOVING VEHICLE PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY 6 INJURIES 0 FATALITIES 0 0 TOTAL NO. OF CRASHES 6 REAR END NON-INVOLVED VEHICLE HEAD ON PEDESTRIAN / BICYCLIST X 0 CR 638 (Valley Street) BACKING VEHICLE FATAL CRASH FIXED OBJECT ANIMAL NON-FIXED OBJECT POTHOLE Maplewood & S. Orange Townships, Essex County 0 2014 CRASHES OUT OF CONTROL 0 2015 CRASHES OVERTURNED 0 2016 CRASHES PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY CRASH INJURY IN CRASH between Millburn Avenue and S. Orange Avenue RIGHT ANGLE SIDE SWIPE 0 LEFT TURN 2014 - 2016 COLLISION DIAGRAMS Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. GPI Engineering and Construction Services NOT TO SCALE COLLISION DIAGRAM DATA TIME NO. DAY DATE 2 09:35 FRI 01-10-14 6 42 15:47 17:58 46 62 09:20 19:26 15:25 WED TUE TUE 01-29-14 06-10-14 06-24-14 10-03-14 64 80 90 131 132 151 164 FRI WED 11:35 23:29 TUE THU 15:21 16:01 07:35 07:15 WED MON MON MON SURFACE NO. WEATHER LIGHT CONDITION INJURED CONDITION 0 0 2 SNOWY DRY DRY SNOW CLEAR CLEAR DAY 0 0 0 DRY DRY CLEAR CLEAR 0 0 WET SNOWY DRY DAY DARK DAY DAY 0 0 1 WET DRY DRY OVERCAST SNOW CLEAR RAIN 0 DRY 10-15-14 01-06-15 03-12-15 10-28-15 11-02-15 02-08-16 04-18-16 CLEAR CLEAR CLEAR DAY DAY DARK DAY DAY DAY DAY M A TC SEE SHEE T NO .3 Y E L L A V CR T( S 8) 63 90 80 64 151 62 46 131 2 6 RD FI LE: TI ME: AVE 11: 42: 39 AM CAN TUS H ARVAR D PL L: \2017659 HSI P Pr ogr am VA L L E YS 42 T( C R6 3 8 ) GI RARD and Pr oj ectDevel opmentSuppor t \NJDOT HSI P Year1\CaddHwy\03 Essex\CADD\Sheet s\Sheet -04. dgn OF 1 4 H LI NE C NE D M A TC H LI 4 OF 1 T NO .5 SEE SHEE 164 132 4 DATE: 3/ 12/ 2018 LEGEND NUMBER OF CRASHES WITH 14 TYPES OF CRASHES SYMBOLS COLORS NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION GREENMAN-PEDERSEN,I NC. MOVING VEHICLE PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY 10 INJURIES 2 FATALITIES 0 TOTAL NO. OF CRASHES 12 REAR END NON-INVOLVED VEHICLE HEAD ON PEDESTRIAN / BICYCLIST X 0 0 CR 638 (Valley Street) BACKING VEHICLE FATAL CRASH FIXED OBJECT ANIMAL NON-FIXED OBJECT POTHOLE Maplewood & S. Orange Townships, Essex County 0 2014 CRASHES OUT OF CONTROL 0 2015 CRASHES OVERTURNED 0 2016 CRASHES PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY CRASH 0 between Millburn Avenue and S. Orange Avenue RIGHT ANGLE SIDE SWIPE INJURY IN CRASH LEFT TURN Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. GPI Engineering and Construction Services NOT TO SCALE COLLISION DIAGRAM DATA BA KE R ST NO. TIME DAY DATE NO. SURFACE INJURED CONDITION WEATHER LIGHT CONDITION 16 17 15:12 08:27 THU FRI 03-13-14 03-14-14 0 0 DRY ICY CLEAR CLEAR DAY DAY 33 41 49 07:30 15:34 09:23 MON FRI TUE 05-05-14 06-06-14 07-15-14 0 0 0 DRY DRY DRY CLEAR CLEAR OVERCAST DAY DAY DAY 54 76 100 136 17:23 15:00 16:02 16:17 WED TUE MON TUE 08-06-14 12-09-14 05-04-15 11-17-15 0 0 0 DRY WET DRY CLEAR CLEAR CLEAR DAY DAY DAY 169 170 17:12 13:23 MON TUE 05-23-16 05-24-16 0 0 0 DRY DRY WET CLEAR CLEAR CLEAR DUSK DAY DAY 182 192 198 13:34 15:21 19:06 WED WED MON 09-07-16 12-07-16 12-28-16 1 0 0 DRY WET DRY CLEAR CLEAR CLEAR DARK DAY DAY 41 169 182 49 100 136 76 170 ) 8 3 R6 C T( YS E L VAL 33 17 NE E M A TCH LI 16 4 OF 1 SEE SHEET NO .6 A TC SEE SHEE T NO .4 M 54 198 FI LE: L: \2017659 HSI P Pr ogr am S CRESCEN T ST and Pr oj ectDevel opmentSuppor t \NJDOT HSI P Year1\CaddHwy\03 Essex\CADD\Sheet s\Sheet -05. dgn O F 14 H LI NE D 192 11: 46: 20 AM N TI ME: T TS N E C S RE C S LEGEND 3/ 12/ 2018 DATE: CR ES CE N T NUMBER OF CRASHES WITH 5 ST 14 TYPES OF CRASHES SYMBOLS COLORS NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION GREENMAN-PEDERSEN,I NC. MOVING VEHICLE PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY 13 INJURIES 1 FATALITIES 0 0 TOTAL NO. OF CRASHES 14 REAR END NON-INVOLVED VEHICLE HEAD ON PEDESTRIAN / BICYCLIST X 0 CR 638 (Valley Street) BACKING VEHICLE FATAL CRASH FIXED OBJECT ANIMAL NON-FIXED OBJECT POTHOLE Maplewood & S. Orange Townships, Essex County 0 2014 CRASHES OUT OF CONTROL 0 2015 CRASHES OVERTURNED 0 2016 CRASHES PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY CRASH INJURY IN CRASH between Millburn Avenue and S. Orange Avenue RIGHT ANGLE SIDE SWIPE 0 LEFT TURN 2014 - 2016 COLLISION DIAGRAMS Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. GPI Engineering and Construction Services NOT TO SCALE COLLISION DIAGRAM DATA NO. NO. SURFACE O A K VI EW DAY DATE 27 38 00:12 14:55 SUN WED 04-27-14 05-21-14 0 0 DRY DRY CLEAR CLEAR DARK DAY 43 58 83 08:11 16:43 05:49 THU TUE SUN 06-12-14 09-02-14 02-15-15 0 0 1 WET DRY SNOWY OVERCAST CLEAR BLOWING SNOW DAY DAY DARK 98 99 111 113 14:48 14:58 20:30 14:51 MON MON MON THU 05-04-15 05-04-15 06-15-15 06-18-15 0 0 1 DRY DRY DRY CLEAR CLEAR CLEAR DAY DAY DARK 116 124 15:25 17:22 SAT MON 07-11-15 09-14-15 0 0 1 DRY DRY DRY CLEAR CLEAR CLEAR DAY DAY DAY 125 126 133 20:19 08:15 09:00 SUN MON MON 09-20-15 09-21-15 11-09-15 0 0 0 DRY DRY DRY CLEAR CLEAR CLEAR DUSK DAY 156 172 15:45 14:47 FRI TUE 02-26-16 05-31-16 1 0 DRY DRY CLEAR CLEAR INJURED WEATHER LIGHT TIME CONDITION CONDITION DAY DAY DAY M ATCH LI NE F SEE SHEET NO .7 O F 1 4 124 126 38 99 125 172 113 58 83 VAL L E YS T( C R6 3 8 ) 111 156 98 133 116 43 L: \2017659 HSI P Pr ogr am PARK RD O AKV I EW and Pr oj ectDevel opmentSuppor t \NJDOT HSI P Year1\CaddHwy\03 Essex\CADD\Sheet s\Sheet -06. dgn AVE M ATCH LI NE E SEE SHEET NO .5 OF 1 4 27 TI ME: 11: 48: 32 AM FI LE: AVE 6 DATE: 3/ 12/ 2018 LEGEND NUMBER OF CRASHES WITH 14 TYPES OF CRASHES SYMBOLS COLORS NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION GREENMAN-PEDERSEN,I NC. MOVING VEHICLE PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY 12 INJURIES 4 FATALITIES 0 0 TOTAL NO. OF CRASHES 16 REAR END NON-INVOLVED VEHICLE HEAD ON PEDESTRIAN / BICYCLIST X 0 CR 638 (Valley Street) BACKING VEHICLE FATAL CRASH FIXED OBJECT ANIMAL NON-FIXED OBJECT POTHOLE Maplewood & S. Orange Townships, Essex County 0 2014 CRASHES OUT OF CONTROL 0 2015 CRASHES OVERTURNED 0 2016 CRASHES PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY CRASH INJURY IN CRASH between Millburn Avenue and S. Orange Avenue RIGHT ANGLE SIDE SWIPE 0 LEFT TURN 2014 - 2016 COLLISION DIAGRAMS Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. GPI Engineering and Construction Services NOT TO SCALE COLLISION DIAGRAM DATA NO. TIME DAY DATE NO. SURFACE INJURED CONDITION WEATHER LIGHT CONDITION D LAN O AK 4 19 14:33 09:53 WED MON 01-15-14 03-17-14 0 0 DRY DRY OVERCAST CLEAR DAY DAY 24 40 48 14:58 14:02 12:41 SUN THU FRI 04-13-14 06-05-14 07-04-14 1 0 0 DRY DRY WET CLEAR CLEAR RAIN DAY DAY DAY 60 66 69 77 16:33 10:47 17:14 11:06 SAT SUN MON SAT 09-13-14 10-19-14 11-10-14 12-13-14 0 0 0 WET DRY DRY RAIN CLEAR CLEAR DAY DAY DUSK 88 141 16:50 09:43 WED TUE 03-11-15 12-08-15 1 1 1 DRY DRY DRY CLEAR CLEAR CLEAR DAY DAY DAY 153 167 180 14:54 17:19 18:06 WED SUN WED 02-10-16 05-22-16 08-09-16 0 0 0 DRY DRY DRY CLEAR CLEAR CLEAR 184 15:05 SAT 09-17-16 0 DRY CLEAR DAY DAY DARK DAY RD VAL L E YS T ( C R6 3 8 ) 24 60 180 O EW O EDG TI ME: 12: 28: 51PM PL L D P LN RD L: \2017659 HSI P Pr ogr am 69 141 ) 8 3 R6 C T( YS E L VAL N CO LI D LAN O AK FI LE: NE G M ATCH LI 48 66 77 88 153 184 19 4 SEE SHEET NO .8 O F 1 4 F NE F 14 LI O .6 NO and Pr oj ectDevel opmentSuppor t \NJDOT HSI P Year1\CaddHwy\03 Essex\CADD\Sheet s\Sheet -07. dgn H TC M A HEET S SEE 167 40 7 DATE: 3/ 12/ 2018 LEGEND NUMBER OF CRASHES WITH 14 TYPES OF CRASHES SYMBOLS COLORS NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MOVING VEHICLE PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY GREENMAN-PEDERSEN,I NC. INJURIES FATALITIES 11 4 0 0 TOTAL NO. OF CRASHES 15 REAR END NON-INVOLVED VEHICLE HEAD ON PEDESTRIAN / BICYCLIST X 0 CR 638 (Valley Street) BACKING VEHICLE FATAL CRASH FIXED OBJECT ANIMAL NON-FIXED OBJECT POTHOLE Maplewood & S. Orange Townships, Essex County 0 2014 CRASHES OUT OF CONTROL 0 2015 CRASHES OVERTURNED 0 2016 CRASHES PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY CRASH INJURY IN CRASH between Millburn Avenue and S. Orange Avenue RIGHT ANGLE SIDE SWIPE 0 LEFT TURN 2014 - 2016 COLLISION DIAGRAMS Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. GPI Engineering and Construction Services NOT TO SCALE COLLISION DIAGRAM DATA DAY DATE NO. SURFACE INJURED CONDITION WEATHER LIGHT CONDITION TUE WED 02-18-14 02-19-14 2 0 WET WET CLEAR CLEAR DAY DAY 14:57 08:11 19:36 MON WED FRI 02-24-14 04-30-14 08-29-14 0 0 0 DRY WET DRY CLEAR RAIN CLEAR DAY DAY DARK 72 78 93 19:19 08:11 13:33 WED THU WED 11-19-14 12-18-14 04-22-15 0 0 0 DRY DRY DRY CLEAR CLEAR CLEAR DARK DAY DAY 96 107 114 13:44 11:06 16:32 SAT FRI TUE 05-02-15 05-29-15 07-07-15 0 0 0 DRY DRY DRY CLEAR CLEAR CLEAR DAY DAY 119 122 123 13:38 19:05 20:11 MON SUN THU 08-03-15 09-06-15 09-10-15 0 0 DRY DRY CLEAR CLEAR DAY DAY DAY 127 128 15:39 08:17 FRI MON 10-09-15 10-12-15 0 0 0 WET WET DRY RAIN OVERCAST CLEAR DARK DAY DAY 142 150 158 09:50 18:48 14:30 TUE SAT WED 12-08-15 02-06-16 03-02-16 0 0 0 DRY DRY DRY CLEAR CLEAR CLEAR DAY DARK DAY 168 190 191 08:48 15:10 14:12 MON TUE WED 05-23-16 12-06-16 12-07-16 0 0 0 DRY DRY WET CLEAR CLEAR CLEAR DAY DAY DAY 195 196 15:12 - FRI SAT 12-09-16 12-10-16 0 0 DRY DRY CLEAR CLEAR DAY DAY W 16:12 - 13 30 56 NE G M ATC H LI 4 OF 1 SEE SHEET NO .7 142 11 122 158 150 93 30 195 VAL L E YS T( C R6 3 8 ) 96 196 72 128 127 190 56 123 78 AVE KER PAR PL ELL OD L: \2017659 HSI P Pr ogr am 168 W CRO EW O FI LE: 107 13 119 191 114 10 EDG and Pr oj ectDevel opmentSuppor t \NJDOT HSI P Year1\CaddHwy\03 Essex\CADD\Sheet s\Sheet -08. dgn AVE PARKE R AVE JEFFERSO N 10 11 NE H M ATC H LI TIME 4 SEE SHEET NO .9 O F 1 NO. TI ME: 12: 33: 06 PM PL 8 DATE: 3/ 12/ 2018 LEGEND NUMBER OF CRASHES WITH 14 TYPES OF CRASHES SYMBOLS COLORS NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION GREENMAN-PEDERSEN,I NC. MOVING VEHICLE PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY 23 INJURIES 1 FATALITIES 0 0 TOTAL NO. OF CRASHES 24 REAR END NON-INVOLVED VEHICLE HEAD ON PEDESTRIAN / BICYCLIST X 0 CR 638 (Valley Street) BACKING VEHICLE FATAL CRASH FIXED OBJECT ANIMAL NON-FIXED OBJECT POTHOLE Maplewood & S. Orange Townships, Essex County 0 2014 CRASHES OUT OF CONTROL 0 2015 CRASHES OVERTURNED 0 2016 CRASHES PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY CRASH INJURY IN CRASH between Millburn Avenue and S. Orange Avenue RIGHT ANGLE SIDE SWIPE 0 LEFT TURN 2014 - 2016 COLLISION DIAGRAMS Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. GPI Engineering and Construction Services NOT TO SCALE COLLISION DIAGRAM DATA NO. TIME DAY DATE 57 74 89 101 12:08 17:49 SAT FRI 14:19 13:03 THU TUE THU 140 14:31 NO. SURFACE WEATHER LIGHT INJURED CONDITION CONDITION 08-30-14 12-05-14 0 0 DRY WET CLEAR RAIN DAY DARK 03-12-15 05-05-15 12-03-15 0 0 0 DRY DRY DRY CLEAR CLEAR CLEAR DAY DAY DAY XO N HI 89 NE I M ATCH LI ) 8 3 R6 C T( YS E L VAL 4 0 OF 1 SEE SHEET NO .1 M ATCH LI NE H 101 74 XO HI TI ME: 12: 34: 51PM PL FI LE: N L: \2017659 HSI P Pr ogr am SEE SHEET NO .8 O F 1 4 and Pr oj ectDevel opmentSuppor t \NJDOT HSI P Year1\CaddHwy\03 Essex\CADD\Sheet s\Sheet -09. dgn PL 57 140 9 DATE: 3/ 12/ 2018 LEGEND NUMBER OF CRASHES WITH 14 TYPES OF CRASHES SYMBOLS COLORS NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION GREENMAN-PEDERSEN,I NC. MOVING VEHICLE PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY 5 INJURIES 0 FATALITIES 0 0 TOTAL NO. OF CRASHES 5 REAR END NON-INVOLVED VEHICLE HEAD ON PEDESTRIAN / BICYCLIST X 0 CR 638 (Valley Street) BACKING VEHICLE FATAL CRASH FIXED OBJECT ANIMAL NON-FIXED OBJECT POTHOLE Maplewood & S. Orange Townships, Essex County 0 2014 CRASHES OUT OF CONTROL 0 2015 CRASHES OVERTURNED 0 2016 CRASHES PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY CRASH INJURY IN CRASH between Millburn Avenue and S. Orange Avenue RIGHT ANGLE SIDE SWIPE 0 LEFT TURN 2014 - 2016 COLLISION DIAGRAMS Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. GPI Engineering and Construction Services NOT TO SCALE COLLISION DIAGRAM DATA TIME DAY DATE 15 37 44 16:29 12:16 FRI WED FRI TUE MON WED 03-07-14 05-21-14 06-13-14 65 68 73 79 12:19 12:42 17:06 19:16 13:26 08:29 22:46 FRI MON 84 108 15:13 08:20 07-15-14 08-18-14 10-15-14 11-07-14 12-01-14 12-31-14 02-17-15 WED TUE WED 06-03-15 SURFACE WEATHER CONDITION 0 0 0 DRY DRY DRY 0 1 1 DRY DRY WET 0 0 DRY DRY DRY RAIN CLEAR CLEAR CLEAR DRY DRY CLEAR CLEAR 2 0 0 CLEAR CLEAR CLEAR OVERCAST CLEAR LIGHT CONDITION DAY DAY DAY DAY DAY DARK DAY DAY DARK DAY DAY 108 50 VAL L E YS T( C R6 3 8 ) 73 M ATCH LI NE J M ATC H LI NE I SEE SHEET NO .9 O F 1 4 15 44 84 37 68 55 VAL L E YS T( C R6 3 8 ) 65 L: \2017659 HSI P Pr ogr am FI LE: TI ME: AVE E TERRAC 12: 36: 52 PM 79 RO LAN D ARN O LD and Pr oj ectDevel opmentSuppor t \NJDOT HSI P Year1\CaddHwy\03 Essex\CADD\Sheet s\Sheet -10. dgn 50 55 NO. INJURED SEE SHEET NO .1 1O F 1 4 NO. 10 DATE: 3/ 12/ 2018 LEGEND NUMBER OF CRASHES WITH 14 TYPES OF CRASHES SYMBOLS COLORS NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION GREENMAN-PEDERSEN,I NC. MOVING VEHICLE PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY 8 INJURIES 3 FATALITIES 0 0 TOTAL NO. OF CRASHES 11 REAR END NON-INVOLVED VEHICLE HEAD ON PEDESTRIAN / BICYCLIST X 0 CR 638 (Valley Street) BACKING VEHICLE FATAL CRASH FIXED OBJECT ANIMAL NON-FIXED OBJECT POTHOLE Maplewood & S. Orange Townships, Essex County 0 2014 CRASHES OUT OF CONTROL 0 2015 CRASHES OVERTURNED 0 2016 CRASHES PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY CRASH INJURY IN CRASH between Millburn Avenue and S. Orange Avenue RIGHT ANGLE SIDE SWIPE 0 LEFT TURN 2014 - 2016 COLLISION DIAGRAMS Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. GPI Engineering and Construction Services NOT TO SCALE COLLISION DIAGRAM DATA NO. TIME DAY DATE 14 28 14:09 08:31 THU MON 86 130 15:02 14:19 MON MON NO. SURFACE WEATHER LIGHT INJURED CONDITION CONDITION 02-27-14 04-28-14 0 0 DRY DRY CLEAR CLEAR DAY DAY 02-23-15 10-19-15 0 0 DRY DRY CLEAR CLEAR DAY DAY NE K M ATCH LI VAL L E YS T( C R6 3 8 ) 130 M ASSEL TERR TI ME: 12: 38: 54 PM FI LE: ST L: \2017659 HSI P Pr ogr am 4 2 OF 1 SEE SHEET NO .1 28 86 5TH and Pr oj ectDevel opmentSuppor t \NJDOT HSI P Year1\CaddHwy\03 Essex\CADD\Sheet s\Sheet -11. dgn LACKAW AN N A PL M ATCH LI NE J SEE SHEET NO .1 0 OF 1 4 14 11 DATE: 3/ 12/ 2018 LEGEND NUMBER OF CRASHES WITH 14 TYPES OF CRASHES SYMBOLS COLORS NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION GREENMAN-PEDERSEN,I NC. MOVING VEHICLE PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY 4 INJURIES 0 FATALITIES 0 0 TOTAL NO. OF CRASHES 4 REAR END NON-INVOLVED VEHICLE HEAD ON PEDESTRIAN / BICYCLIST X 0 CR 638 (Valley Street) BACKING VEHICLE FATAL CRASH FIXED OBJECT ANIMAL NON-FIXED OBJECT POTHOLE Maplewood & S. Orange Townships, Essex County 0 2014 CRASHES OUT OF CONTROL 0 2015 CRASHES OVERTURNED 0 2016 CRASHES PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY CRASH INJURY IN CRASH between Millburn Avenue and S. Orange Avenue RIGHT ANGLE SIDE SWIPE 0 LEFT TURN 2014 - 2016 COLLISION DIAGRAMS Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. GPI Engineering and Construction Services NOT TO SCALE COLLISION DIAGRAM DATA NO. TIME DAY DATE NO. SURFACE INJURED CONDITION WEATHER LIGHT CONDITION 9 25 08:09 08:26 SUN THU 02-02-14 04-24-14 0 0 DRY DRY CLEAR CLEAR DARK DAY 26 29 31 16:06 13:54 15:55 THU MON WED 04-24-14 04-28-14 04-30-14 0 0 0 DRY DRY WET CLEAR CLEAR RAIN DAY DAY DAY 32 51 53 67 14:34 14:53 17:02 13:18 SAT TUE THU FRI 05-03-14 07-15-14 07-24-14 10-24-14 0 0 0 DRY WET DRY CLEAR OVERCAST CLEAR DAY DAY DAY 71 91 14:22 08:29 WED FRI 11-19-14 04-03-15 0 0 0 DRY DRY DRY CLEAR CLEAR OVERCAST DAY DAY DAY 115 120 129 23:57 14:42 10:43 THU FRI THU 07-09-15 08-21-15 10-15-15 0 2 0 WET DRY DRY CLEAR CLEAR CLEAR DARK DAY 135 144 17:25 17:16 SUN THU 11-15-15 12-10-15 0 0 DRY DRY CLEAR CLEAR DAY DARK DARK 148 157 166 10:52 16:02 17:00 THU FRI TUE 01-28-16 02-26-16 04-26-16 0 0 0 WET DRY DRY CLEAR CLEAR OVERCAST DAY DAY DAY 175 185 193 21:59 09:37 19:52 THU SAT WED 06-23-16 10-29-16 12-07-16 0 0 1 DRY DRY DRY CLEAR CLEAR CLEAR DARK DAY DARK 3RD 4TH 166 185 120 144 29 32 53 193 51 148 175 91 9 25 115 157 3RD 4TH FI LE: T NO .1 SEE SHEE VAL L E YS T( C R6 3 8 ) 31 67 NE L M A TC H LI3 O F 14 26 135 L: \2017659 HSI P Pr ogr am and Pr oj ectDevel opmentSuppor t \NJDOT HSI P Year1\CaddHwy\03 Essex\CADD\Sheet s\Sheet -12. dgn ST ST NE K M ATCH LI 4 1O F 1 SEE SHEET NO .1 129 71 ST TI ME: 12: 40: 48 PM ST 12 DATE: 3/ 12/ 2018 LEGEND NUMBER OF CRASHES WITH 14 TYPES OF CRASHES SYMBOLS COLORS NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MOVING VEHICLE PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY GREENMAN-PEDERSEN,I NC. INJURIES FATALITIES 20 2 0 0 TOTAL NO. OF CRASHES 22 REAR END NON-INVOLVED VEHICLE HEAD ON PEDESTRIAN / BICYCLIST X 0 CR 638 (Valley Street) BACKING VEHICLE FATAL CRASH FIXED OBJECT ANIMAL NON-FIXED OBJECT POTHOLE Maplewood & S. Orange Townships, Essex County 0 2014 CRASHES OUT OF CONTROL 0 2015 CRASHES OVERTURNED 0 2016 CRASHES PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY CRASH INJURY IN CRASH between Millburn Avenue and S. Orange Avenue RIGHT ANGLE SIDE SWIPE 0 LEFT TURN 2014 - 2016 COLLISION DIAGRAMS Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. GPI Engineering and Construction Services NOT TO SCALE COLLISION DIAGRAM DATA NO. TIME DAY DATE 5 18 16:12 14:14 MON FRI 01-20-14 03-14-14 23 34 16:17 18:44 TUE SAT 04-08-14 05-10-14 35 39 70 16:10 13:46 18:39 TUE TUE TUE 05-13-14 05-27-14 11-11-14 75 87 92 13:54 22:01 12:25 SAT FRI THU 12-06-14 03-06-15 04-16-15 94 97 15:09 14:37 16:48 FRI MON FRI 04-24-15 05-04-15 05-08-15 11:25 15:33 WED WED 05-27-15 06-10-15 1 1 0 117 134 143 12:19 17:29 14:52 THU FRI WED 07-16-15 11-13-15 12-09-15 0 0 0 146 149 13:50 21:44 WED THU 01-06-16 01-28-16 160 173 179 187 14:44 07:49 16:37 11:15 TUE TUE WED FRI 04-05-16 06-07-16 08-03-16 11-11-16 0 0 0 103 105 110 SURFACE INJURED CONDITION 0 DRY 0 0 0 DRY DRY WET DRY 0 0 0 0 DRY DRY WET DRY DRY 0 0 DRY DRY DRY 0 0 DRY DRY DRY DRY DRY DRY WET DRY DRY DRY DRY 0 0 0 LIGHT WEATHER CONDITION DAY CLEAR CLEAR CLEAR OVERCAST DAY DAY DAY CLEAR CLEAR DAY DAY CLEAR RAIN CLEAR DARK DAY DARK CLEAR CLEAR DAY DAY DAY CLEAR CLEAR CLEAR DAY DAY DAY CLEAR CLEAR CLEAR DAY DUSK CLEAR CLEAR CLEAR DUSK DAY DARK CLEAR CLEAR DAY DAY CLEAR CLEAR DAY DAY ST 1ST NO. ST 110 173 39 117 70 23 35 179 92 Y E L VAL34 97 149 75 143 MA H TC T EE SH 160 S T( CR 63 8) 18 105 5 ST 1ST 187 TI ME: 12: 42: 52 PM ST FI LE: 2N D L: \2017659 HSI P Pr ogr am L NE F 14 LI O .12 NO 134 NE M M ATCH LI 146 94 VA L L E Y 103 4 4 OF 1 SEE SHEET NO .1 ) 8 3 6 R C T( S 87 E SE and Pr oj ectDevel opmentSuppor t \NJDOT HSI P Year1\CaddHwy\03 Essex\CADD\Sheet s\Sheet -13. dgn 2N D AGE L L VI AZA L P 13 DATE: 3/ 12/ 2018 LEGEND NUMBER OF CRASHES WITH 14 TYPES OF CRASHES SYMBOLS COLORS NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MOVING VEHICLE PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY GREENMAN-PEDERSEN,I NC. INJURIES FATALITIES 22 2 0 0 TOTAL NO. OF CRASHES 24 REAR END NON-INVOLVED VEHICLE HEAD ON PEDESTRIAN / BICYCLIST X 0 CR 638 (Valley Street) BACKING VEHICLE FATAL CRASH FIXED OBJECT ANIMAL NON-FIXED OBJECT POTHOLE Maplewood & S. Orange Townships, Essex County 0 2014 CRASHES OUT OF CONTROL 0 2015 CRASHES OVERTURNED 0 2016 CRASHES PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY CRASH INJURY IN CRASH between Millburn Avenue and S. Orange Avenue RIGHT ANGLE SIDE SWIPE 0 LEFT TURN 2014 - 2016 COLLISION DIAGRAMS Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. GPI Engineering and Construction Services NOT TO SCALE COLLISION DIAGRAM DATA TIME DAY DATE 1 45 12:30 14:59 SAT 01-04-14 06-20-14 59 63 112 22:59 17:47 154 161 174 186 188 12:22 12:57 09:11 15:35 14:32 08:46 FRI FRI NO. 09-05-14 10-10-14 06-17-15 02-11-16 FRI WED THU WED THU SAT 04-06-16 06-16-16 11-05-16 11-15-16 TUE SURFACE INJURED CONDITION 0 0 0 0 WET DRY DRY 1 0 DRY DRY DRY 0 0 1 DRY DRY DRY 0 WET WEATHER CLEAR CLEAR CLEAR CLEAR CLEAR CLEAR CLEAR CLEAR RAIN LIGHT CONDITION DAY DAY DARK DUSK DAY DAY DAY DAY DAY DAY LO R TAY CK STO CO M AVE GE RAN S O PL PL AGE L L VI A AZ L P NO. TC H L I NE M SEE S HEET NO .1 3 OF 1 4 MA 154 188 ) 8 3 R6 C D ( R D N A L T O C S 174 161 59 112 186 VAL L E YS T ( C R6 3 8 ) 45 63 S L: \2017659 HSI P Pr ogr am and Pr oj ectDevel opmentSuppor t \NJDOT HSI P Year1\CaddHwy\03 Essex\CADD\Sheet s\Sheet -14. dgn 1 N CO FI LE: TI ME: PL E AV 12: 44: 25 PM E TT NE G AN OR 14 DATE: 3/ 12/ 2018 LEGEND NUMBER OF CRASHES WITH 14 TYPES OF CRASHES SYMBOLS COLORS NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION GREENMAN-PEDERSEN,I NC. MOVING VEHICLE PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY 8 INJURIES 2 FATALITIES 0 0 TOTAL NO. OF CRASHES 10 REAR END NON-INVOLVED VEHICLE HEAD ON PEDESTRIAN / BICYCLIST X 0 CR 638 (Valley Street) BACKING VEHICLE FATAL CRASH FIXED OBJECT ANIMAL NON-FIXED OBJECT POTHOLE Maplewood & S. Orange Townships, Essex County 0 2014 CRASHES OUT OF CONTROL 0 2015 CRASHES OVERTURNED 0 2016 CRASHES PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY CRASH INJURY IN CRASH between Millburn Avenue and S. Orange Avenue RIGHT ANGLE SIDE SWIPE 0 LEFT TURN 2014 - 2016 COLLISION DIAGRAMS Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. GPI Engineering and Construction Services NOT TO SCALE Appendix E – Pedest rian Crash Diagrams COLLISION DIAGRAM DATA M DAY DATE 15 18:15 SUN 10-30-16 NO. SURFACE INJURED CONDITION 0 WET WEATHER RAIN LIGHT CONDITION DARK 36 0) ) 8 3 R6 C T( YS E L VAL X 15 M A TC H 4 1 .2 O F ET NO SEE SHE A VAL L E YS T( C R6 3 8 ) NE LI M LLA VI U LB IL and Pr oj ectDevel opmentSuppor t \NJDOT HSI P Year1\CaddHwy\02 Essex\Val ey St l \Sheet s - Peds\Sheet -01. dgn ( CR IEW TV ES CR N R E V A TI ME: ) 0 6 3 4: 31: 32 PM R (C E AV CE RA TER L: \2017659 HSI P Pr ogr am TIME I LL B U RN A V E FI LE: NO. 1 DATE: 3/ 12/ 2018 LEGEND NUMBER OF CRASHES WITH 14 TYPES OF CRASHES SYMBOLS COLORS NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION GREENMAN-PEDERSEN,I NC. MOVING VEHICLE PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY 1 INJURIES 0 FATALITIES 0 0 TOTAL NO. OF CRASHES 1 REAR END NON-INVOLVED VEHICLE HEAD ON PEDESTRIAN / BICYCLIST X 0 CR 638 (Valley Street) BACKING VEHICLE LEFT TURN between Millburn Avenue and S. Orange Avenue Maplewood & S. Orange Townships, Essex County RIGHT ANGLE SIDE SWIPE 2012-2016 PEDESTRIAN COLLISION DIAGRAMS PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY CRASH INJURY IN CRASH 0 FATAL CRASH OUT OF CONTROL 0 FIXED OBJECT ANIMAL NON-FIXED OBJECT POTHOLE OVERTURNED PEDESTRIAN CRASH Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. GPI Engineering and Construction Services NOT TO SCALE COLLISION DIAGRAM DATA NO. TIME DAY DATE 2 10:46 TUE 07-31-12 NO. SURFACE INJURED CONDITION 1 DRY WEATHER LIGHT CONDITION CLEAR DAY SO ER PI N M A TC H SEE S HEET NO .1O F H LI NE A 1 4 NE B LI 4 OF 1 T NO .3 SEE SHEE X M A TC R C T( S Y E L L VA ) 8 3 6 S RD L: \2017659 HSI P Pr ogr am RD FI LE: N A SO ER PI IEW DV OA BR ND RY and Pr oj ectDevel opmentSuppor t \NJDOT HSI P Year1\CaddHwy\02 Essex\Val ey St l \Sheet s - Peds\Sheet -02. dgn RD 2 TI ME: 4: 39: 56 PM E AV 2 DATE: 3/ 12/ 2018 LEGEND NUMBER OF CRASHES WITH 14 TYPES OF CRASHES SYMBOLS COLORS NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION GREENMAN-PEDERSEN,I NC. MOVING VEHICLE PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY 0 INJURIES 1 FATALITIES 0 0 TOTAL NO. OF CRASHES 1 REAR END NON-INVOLVED VEHICLE HEAD ON PEDESTRIAN / BICYCLIST X 0 CR 638 (Valley Street) BACKING VEHICLE LEFT TURN between Millburn Avenue and S. Orange Avenue Maplewood & S. Orange Townships, Essex County RIGHT ANGLE SIDE SWIPE 2012-2016 PEDESTRIAN COLLISION DIAGRAMS PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY CRASH INJURY IN CRASH 0 FATAL CRASH OUT OF CONTROL 0 FIXED OBJECT ANIMAL NON-FIXED OBJECT POTHOLE OVERTURNED PEDESTRIAN CRASH Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. GPI Engineering and Construction Services NOT TO SCALE COLLISION DIAGRAM DATA NO. TIME DAY DATE - - - - NO. SURFACE INJURED CONDITION - - WEATHER - LIGHT CONDITION - ON RS PIE RD H L M SO M TI ME: 4: 42: 26 PM FI LE: L: \2017659 HSI P Pr ogr am AVE ER VE K A PAR and Pr oj ectDevel opmentSuppor t \NJDOT HSI P Year1\CaddHwy\02 Essex\Val ey St l \Sheet s - Peds\Sheet -03. dgn M A TC M ATCH LI NE B SEE SHEET NO .2 O F 1 4 4 F 1 .4 O T NO SHEE SEE NE C I VAL L E YS T( C R6 3 8 ) 3 DATE: 3/ 12/ 2018 LEGEND NUMBER OF CRASHES WITH 14 TYPES OF CRASHES SYMBOLS COLORS NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION GREENMAN-PEDERSEN,I NC. MOVING VEHICLE PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY 0 INJURIES 0 FATALITIES 0 0 TOTAL NO. OF CRASHES 0 REAR END NON-INVOLVED VEHICLE HEAD ON PEDESTRIAN / BICYCLIST X 0 CR 638 (Valley Street) BACKING VEHICLE LEFT TURN between Millburn Avenue and S. Orange Avenue Maplewood & S. Orange Townships, Essex County RIGHT ANGLE SIDE SWIPE 2012-2016 PEDESTRIAN COLLISION DIAGRAMS PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY CRASH INJURY IN CRASH 0 FATAL CRASH OUT OF CONTROL 0 FIXED OBJECT ANIMAL NON-FIXED OBJECT POTHOLE OVERTURNED PEDESTRIAN CRASH Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. GPI Engineering and Construction Services NOT TO SCALE COLLISION DIAGRAM DATA TIME DAY DATE 3 06:11 WED 08-01-12 NO. SURFACE INJURED CONDITION 1 WET WEATHER RAIN LIGHT CONDITION DAY SEE SHEE T NO .3 M A TC Y E L L A V 3 CR T( S X RD FI LE: TI ME: AVE 4: 46: 38 PM CAN TUS H ARVAR D PL L: \2017659 HSI P Pr ogr am NE D M A TC H LI 4 OF 1 T NO .5 SEE SHEE VA L L E YS T( C R6 3 8 ) 8) 63 GI RARD and Pr oj ectDevel opmentSuppor t \NJDOT HSI P Year1\CaddHwy\02 Essex\Val ey St l \Sheet s - Peds\Sheet -04. dgn OF 1 4 H LI NE C NO. 4 DATE: 3/ 12/ 2018 LEGEND NUMBER OF CRASHES WITH 14 TYPES OF CRASHES SYMBOLS COLORS NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION GREENMAN-PEDERSEN,I NC. MOVING VEHICLE PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY 0 INJURIES 1 FATALITIES 0 0 TOTAL NO. OF CRASHES 1 REAR END NON-INVOLVED VEHICLE HEAD ON PEDESTRIAN / BICYCLIST X 0 CR 638 (Valley Street) BACKING VEHICLE LEFT TURN between Millburn Avenue and S. Orange Avenue Maplewood & S. Orange Townships, Essex County RIGHT ANGLE SIDE SWIPE 2012-2016 PEDESTRIAN COLLISION DIAGRAMS PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY CRASH INJURY IN CRASH 0 FATAL CRASH OUT OF CONTROL 0 FIXED OBJECT ANIMAL NON-FIXED OBJECT POTHOLE OVERTURNED PEDESTRIAN CRASH Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. GPI Engineering and Construction Services NOT TO SCALE COLLISION DIAGRAM DATA TIME DAY DATE 8 11:39 SUN 10-05-14 NO. SURFACE INJURED CONDITION 1 DRY WEATHER CLEAR LIGHT CONDITION DAY NE E M A TCH LI 4 OF 1 SEE SHEET NO .6 SEE SHEE T NO .4 M 8 ) 8 3 R6 C T( YS E L VAL A TC X FI LE: L: \2017659 HSI P Pr ogr am S CRESCEN T ST and Pr oj ectDevel opmentSuppor t \NJDOT HSI P Year1\CaddHwy\02 Essex\Val ey St l \Sheet s - Peds\Sheet -05. dgn O F 14 H LI NE D BA KE R ST NO. 4: 52: 01PM N TI ME: T TS N E C S RE C S LEGEND 3/ 12/ 2018 DATE: CR ES CE N T NUMBER OF CRASHES WITH 5 ST 14 TYPES OF CRASHES SYMBOLS COLORS NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION GREENMAN-PEDERSEN,I NC. MOVING VEHICLE PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY 0 INJURIES 1 FATALITIES 0 0 TOTAL NO. OF CRASHES 1 REAR END NON-INVOLVED VEHICLE HEAD ON PEDESTRIAN / BICYCLIST X 0 CR 638 (Valley Street) BACKING VEHICLE LEFT TURN between Millburn Avenue and S. Orange Avenue Maplewood & S. Orange Townships, Essex County RIGHT ANGLE SIDE SWIPE 2012-2016 PEDESTRIAN COLLISION DIAGRAMS PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY CRASH INJURY IN CRASH 0 FATAL CRASH OUT OF CONTROL 0 FIXED OBJECT ANIMAL NON-FIXED OBJECT POTHOLE OVERTURNED PEDESTRIAN CRASH Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. GPI Engineering and Construction Services NOT TO SCALE COLLISION DIAGRAM DATA NO. TIME DAY DATE - - - - NO. INJURED SURFACE CONDITION - - WEATHER LIGHT CONDITION - - O A K VI EW L: \2017659 HSI P Pr ogr am M ATCH LI NE F SEE SHEET NO .7 O F 1 4 TI ME: 4: 57: 52 PM AVE FI LE: PARK RD O AKV I EW and Pr oj ectDevel opmentSuppor t \NJDOT HSI P Year1\CaddHwy\02 Essex\Val ey St l \Sheet s - Peds\Sheet -06. dgn AVE M ATCH LI NE E SEE SHEET NO .5 OF 1 4 VAL L E YS T( C R6 3 8 ) 6 DATE: 3/ 12/ 2018 LEGEND NUMBER OF CRASHES WITH 14 TYPES OF CRASHES SYMBOLS COLORS NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION GREENMAN-PEDERSEN,I NC. MOVING VEHICLE PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY 0 INJURIES 0 FATALITIES 0 0 TOTAL NO. OF CRASHES 0 REAR END NON-INVOLVED VEHICLE HEAD ON PEDESTRIAN / BICYCLIST X 0 CR 638 (Valley Street) BACKING VEHICLE LEFT TURN between Millburn Avenue and S. Orange Avenue Maplewood & S. Orange Townships, Essex County RIGHT ANGLE SIDE SWIPE 2012-2016 PEDESTRIAN COLLISION DIAGRAMS PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY CRASH INJURY IN CRASH 0 FATAL CRASH OUT OF CONTROL 0 FIXED OBJECT ANIMAL NON-FIXED OBJECT POTHOLE OVERTURNED PEDESTRIAN CRASH Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. GPI Engineering and Construction Services NOT TO SCALE COLLISION DIAGRAM DATA NO. TIME DAY DATE 14 16:43 MON 06-27-16 NO. SURFACE INJURED CONDITION 0 DRY WEATHER CLEAR LIGHT CONDITION DAY D LAN O AK ) 8 3 R6 C T( YS E L VAL ( C R6 3 8 ) TI ME: 5: 01: 06 PM PL L D P LN RD L: \2017659 HSI P Pr ogr am O EW O EDG N CO LI D LAN O AK FI LE: M ATCH LI NE G VAL L E YS T 4 SEE SHEET NO .8 O F 1 X F NE 14 LI OF .6 NO and Pr oj ectDevel opmentSuppor t \NJDOT HSI P Year1\CaddHwy\02 Essex\Val ey St l \Sheet s - Peds\Sheet -07. dgn RD H TC M A HEET S SEE 14 7 DATE: 3/ 12/ 2018 LEGEND NUMBER OF CRASHES WITH 14 TYPES OF CRASHES SYMBOLS COLORS NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION GREENMAN-PEDERSEN,I NC. MOVING VEHICLE PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY 1 INJURIES 0 FATALITIES 0 0 TOTAL NO. OF CRASHES 1 REAR END NON-INVOLVED VEHICLE HEAD ON PEDESTRIAN / BICYCLIST X 0 CR 638 (Valley Street) BACKING VEHICLE LEFT TURN between Millburn Avenue and S. Orange Avenue Maplewood & S. Orange Townships, Essex County RIGHT ANGLE SIDE SWIPE 2012-2016 PEDESTRIAN COLLISION DIAGRAMS PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY CRASH INJURY IN CRASH 0 FATAL CRASH OUT OF CONTROL 0 FIXED OBJECT ANIMAL NON-FIXED OBJECT POTHOLE OVERTURNED PEDESTRIAN CRASH Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. GPI Engineering and Construction Services NOT TO SCALE COLLISION DIAGRAM DATA NO. SURFACE TIME DAY DATE 9 13 16:54 20:31 WED MON 11-19-14 05-02-16 1 2 DRY DRY CLEAR CLEAR DUSK DARK 16 16:43 WED 11-30-16 1 WET RAIN DARK INJURED CONDITION WEATHER LIGHT NO. CONDITION W JEFFERSO N PARKE R AVE W CRO AVE KER PAR PL ELL OD L: \2017659 HSI P Pr ogr am NE H M ATC H LI 16 EW O FI LE: X VAL L E YS T( C R6 3 8 ) 4 SEE SHEET NO .9 O F 1 X NE G M ATC H LI X 4 OF 1 SEE SHEET NO .7 13 EDG and Pr oj ectDevel opmentSuppor t \NJDOT HSI P Year1\CaddHwy\02 Essex\Val ey St l \Sheet s - Peds\Sheet -08. dgn AVE 9 TI ME: 11: 31: 10 AM PL 8 DATE: 3/ 13/ 2018 LEGEND NUMBER OF CRASHES WITH 14 TYPES OF CRASHES SYMBOLS COLORS NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION GREENMAN-PEDERSEN,I NC. MOVING VEHICLE PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY 0 INJURIES 3 FATALITIES 0 0 TOTAL NO. OF CRASHES 3 REAR END NON-INVOLVED VEHICLE HEAD ON PEDESTRIAN / BICYCLIST X 0 CR 638 (Valley Street) BACKING VEHICLE LEFT TURN between Millburn Avenue and S. Orange Avenue Maplewood & S. Orange Townships, Essex County RIGHT ANGLE SIDE SWIPE 2012-2016 PEDESTRIAN COLLISION DIAGRAMS PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY CRASH INJURY IN CRASH 0 FATAL CRASH OUT OF CONTROL 0 FIXED OBJECT ANIMAL NON-FIXED OBJECT POTHOLE OVERTURNED PEDESTRIAN CRASH Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. GPI Engineering and Construction Services NOT TO SCALE COLLISION DIAGRAM DATA NO. TIME DAY DATE 1 16:58 THU 05-03-12 NO. SURFACE INJURED CONDITION 1 DRY WEATHER CLEAR LIGHT CONDITION DAY XO N HI NE I M ATCH LI ) 8 3 R6 C T( YS E L VAL 4 0 OF 1 SEE SHEET NO .1 X M ATCH LI NE H XO HI TI ME: 11: 33: 17 AM PL FI LE: N L: \2017659 HSI P Pr ogr am SEE SHEET NO .8 O F 1 4 and Pr oj ectDevel opmentSuppor t \NJDOT HSI P Year1\CaddHwy\02 Essex\Val ey St l \Sheet s - Peds\Sheet -09. dgn PL 1 9 DATE: 3/ 13/ 2018 LEGEND NUMBER OF CRASHES WITH 14 TYPES OF CRASHES SYMBOLS COLORS NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION GREENMAN-PEDERSEN,I NC. MOVING VEHICLE PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY 0 INJURIES 1 FATALITIES 0 0 TOTAL NO. OF CRASHES 1 REAR END NON-INVOLVED VEHICLE HEAD ON PEDESTRIAN / BICYCLIST X 0 CR 638 (Valley Street) BACKING VEHICLE LEFT TURN between Millburn Avenue and S. Orange Avenue Maplewood & S. Orange Townships, Essex County RIGHT ANGLE SIDE SWIPE 2012-2016 PEDESTRIAN COLLISION DIAGRAMS PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY CRASH INJURY IN CRASH 0 FATAL CRASH OUT OF CONTROL 0 FIXED OBJECT ANIMAL NON-FIXED OBJECT POTHOLE OVERTURNED PEDESTRIAN CRASH Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. GPI Engineering and Construction Services NOT TO SCALE TIME DAY DATE 6 17:23 MON 12-23-13 NO. SURFACE INJURED CONDITION 1 WET WEATHER OVERCAST LIGHT CONDITION DARK M ATCH LI NE J NO. VAL L E YS T( C R6 3 8 ) 6 TI ME: 11: 38: 06 AM AVE TERRACE L: \2017659 HSI P Pr ogr am VAL L E YS T( C R6 3 8 ) RO LAN D ARN O LD FI LE: X SEE SHEET NO .1 1O F 1 4 M ATC H LI NE I SEE SHEET NO .9 O F 1 4 and Pr oj ectDevel opmentSuppor t \NJDOT HSI P Year1\CaddHwy\02 Essex\Val ey St l \Sheet s - Peds\Sheet -10. dgn COLLISION DIAGRAM DATA 10 DATE: 3/ 13/ 2018 LEGEND NUMBER OF CRASHES WITH 14 TYPES OF CRASHES SYMBOLS COLORS NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION GREENMAN-PEDERSEN,I NC. MOVING VEHICLE PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY 0 INJURIES 1 FATALITIES 0 0 TOTAL NO. OF CRASHES 1 REAR END NON-INVOLVED VEHICLE HEAD ON PEDESTRIAN / BICYCLIST X 0 CR 638 (Valley Street) BACKING VEHICLE LEFT TURN between Millburn Avenue and S. Orange Avenue Maplewood & S. Orange Townships, Essex County RIGHT ANGLE SIDE SWIPE 2012-2016 PEDESTRIAN COLLISION DIAGRAMS PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY CRASH INJURY IN CRASH 0 FATAL CRASH OUT OF CONTROL 0 FIXED OBJECT ANIMAL NON-FIXED OBJECT POTHOLE OVERTURNED PEDESTRIAN CRASH Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. GPI Engineering and Construction Services NOT TO SCALE COLLISION DIAGRAM DATA NO. TIME DAY 5 10 22:48 11:51 FRI 10-18-13 THU 03-26-15 NO. DATE SURFACE INJURED CONDITION 1* 0 DRY DRY WEATHER CLEAR OVERCAST LIGHT CONDITION DARK DAY M ATCH LI NE K M ASSEL TERR TI ME: 11: 41: 07 AM FI LE: ST L: \2017659 HSI P Pr ogr am SEE SHEET NO .1 2 OF 1 4 10 X X 5TH and Pr oj ectDevel opmentSuppor t \NJDOT HSI P Year1\CaddHwy\02 Essex\Val ey St l \Sheet s - Peds\Sheet -11. dgn LACKAW AN N A PL M ATCH LI NE J SEE SHEET NO .1 0 OF 1 4 VAL L E YS T( C R6 3 8 ) 5 11 DATE: 3/ 13/ 2018 LEGEND NUMBER OF CRASHES WITH 14 TYPES OF CRASHES SYMBOLS COLORS NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION GREENMAN-PEDERSEN,I NC. MOVING VEHICLE PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY 1 INJURIES 0 FATALITIES 0 0 TOTAL NO. OF CRASHES 2 REAR END NON-INVOLVED VEHICLE HEAD ON PEDESTRIAN / BICYCLIST X 1 CR 638 (Valley Street) BACKING VEHICLE LEFT TURN between Millburn Avenue and S. Orange Avenue Maplewood & S. Orange Townships, Essex County RIGHT ANGLE SIDE SWIPE 2012-2016 PEDESTRIAN COLLISION DIAGRAMS PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY CRASH INJURY IN CRASH 0 FATAL CRASH OUT OF CONTROL 0 FIXED OBJECT ANIMAL NON-FIXED OBJECT POTHOLE OVERTURNED PEDESTRIAN CRASH Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. GPI Engineering and Construction Services NOT TO SCALE COLLISION DIAGRAM DATA NO. TIME DAY DATE 4 16:14 WED 11-07-12 NO. SURFACE INJURED CONDITION 0 WET WEATHER RAIN LIGHT CONDITION DARK 3RD 4TH NE L TC H LI MA 4 3 OF 1 T NO .1 SEE SHEE X 3RD FI LE: 4TH L: \2017659 HSI P Pr ogr am and Pr oj ectDevel opm me entSuppor t \NJDOT HSI P Year1\CaddHwy\02 Essex\Val l ey St \Sheet s - Peds\Sheet -12. dgn ST ST NE K M ATCH LI 4 1O F 1 SEE SHEET NO .1 4 VAL L E YS T( C R6 3 8 ) ST TI ME M E: 11: 44: 52 AM AM ST 12 DATE: 3/ 13/ 2018 LEGEND NUMBER OF CRASHES WITH 14 TYPES OF CRASHES SYMBOLS COLORS NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION GREENMAN-PEDERSEN,I NC. MOVING VEHICLE PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY 1 INJURIES 0 FATALITIES 0 0 TOTAL NO. OF CRASHES 1 REAR END NON-INVOLVED VEHICLE HEAD ON PEDESTRIAN / BICYCLIST X 0 CR 638 (Valley Street) BACKING VEHICLE LEFT TURN between Millburn Avenue and S. Orange Avenue Maplewood & S. Orange Townships, Essex County RIGHT ANGLE SIDE SWIPE 2012-2016 PEDESTRIAN COLLISION DIAGRAMS PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY CRASH INJURY IN CRASH 0 FATAL CRASH OUT OF CONTROL 0 FIXED OBJECT ANIMAL NON-FIXED OBJECT POTHOLE OVERTURNED PEDESTRIAN CRASH Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. GPI Engineering and Construction Services NOT TO SCALE COLLISION DIAGRAM DATA NO. TIME DAY DATE 7 11 11:12 14:17 WED 01-15-14 FRI 05-15-15 NO. SURFACE INJURED CONDITION 1 1 WET DRY WEATHER LIGHT CONDITION CLEAR DAY CLEAR DAY ST 1ST 11 X X ST 7 63 8) H TC M A SHEET NE M M ATC H LI S T( CR 4 4 OF 1 SEE SHEET NO .1 VA L L E Y ) 8 3 R6 C ( T YS E L L A V E SE ST 1ST NE I L OF .12 NO L TI ME: 11: 48: 01AM ST FI LE: 2N D L: \2017659 HSI P Pr ogr am 14 and Pr oj ectDevel opmentSuppor t \NJDOT HSI P Year1\CaddHwy\02 Essex\Val ey St l \Sheet s - Peds\Sheet -13. dgn 2N D AGE L L VI AZA L P 13 DATE: 3/ 13/ 2018 LEGEND NUMBER OF CRASHES WITH 14 TYPES OF CRASHES SYMBOLS COLORS NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION GREENMAN-PEDERSEN,I NC. MOVING VEHICLE PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY 0 INJURIES 2 FATALITIES 0 0 TOTAL NO. OF CRASHES 2 REAR END NON-INVOLVED VEHICLE HEAD ON PEDESTRIAN / BICYCLIST X 0 CR 638 (Valley Street) BACKING VEHICLE LEFT TURN between Millburn Avenue and S. Orange Avenue Maplewood & S. Orange Townships, Essex County RIGHT ANGLE SIDE SWIPE 2012-2016 PEDESTRIAN COLLISION DIAGRAMS PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY CRASH INJURY IN CRASH 0 FATAL CRASH OUT OF CONTROL 0 FIXED OBJECT ANIMAL NON-FIXED OBJECT POTHOLE OVERTURNED PEDESTRIAN CRASH Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. GPI Engineering and Construction Services NOT TO SCALE COLLISION DIAGRAM DATA NO. TIME DAY DATE 12 16:18 SUN 07-05-15 DRY CLEAR LIGHT CONDITION DAY PL C H LI NE M PL SEE S HEET NO .1 3 OF 1 4 M AT 1 WEATHER CK STO CO M VE E A 12 ) 8 3 RX6 C D ( R D N A L T O C S VAL L E YS T ( C R6 3 8 ) S L: \2017659 HSI P Pr ogr am and Pr oj ectDevel opmentSuppor t \NJDOT HSI P Year1\CaddHwy\02 Essex\Val ey St l \Sheet s - Peds\Sheet -14. dgn SURFACE CONDITION LO R TAY G RAN S O AGE L L VI A AZ L P NO. INJURED N CO FI LE: TI ME: PL E AV 11: 59: 35 AM E TT NE G AN OR 14 DATE: 3/ 13/ 2018 LEGEND NUMBER OF CRASHES WITH 14 TYPES OF CRASHES SYMBOLS COLORS NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION GREENMAN-PEDERSEN,I NC. MOVING VEHICLE PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY 0 INJURIES 1 FATALITIES 0 0 TOTAL NO. OF CRASHES 1 REAR END NON-INVOLVED VEHICLE HEAD ON PEDESTRIAN / BICYCLIST X 0 CR 638 (Valley Street) BACKING VEHICLE LEFT TURN between Millburn Avenue and S. Orange Avenue Maplewood & S. Orange Townships, Essex County RIGHT ANGLE SIDE SWIPE 2012-2016 PEDESTRIAN COLLISION DIAGRAMS PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY CRASH INJURY IN CRASH 0 FATAL CRASH OUT OF CONTROL 0 FIXED OBJECT ANIMAL NON-FIXED OBJECT POTHOLE OVERTURNED PEDESTRIAN CRASH Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. GPI Engineering and Construction Services NOT TO SCALE Appendix F – Phot ographs Villa Terrace gets blocked, despite Pedestrian push buttons are not functioning; There is no pedestrian signage at Lots of pedestrians in the area, "Do Not Block Intersection" sign questionable sign placement or around pedestrian crosswalk however there are few crosswalks M IL LB U R N N H TC MA SO ER PI A V E RD E LIN A RK PA S E AV SO ER PI N N DE AL PL E AV RD E AV RD A ND RY N UR LB IL EW VI AD O BR M AVE E ERRAC LLA T VI EW VI CREST C R 6 3 8 ( VAL L E YS T ) 1 5 NJDOT HSIP ROAD SAFETY AUDIT CR 638 (VALLEY ST) MAPLEWOOD & S ORANGE VILLEGE TOWNSHIPS ESSEX COUNTY receiving lane for EB/WB traffic Pedestrian island is too small with no room for a landing area Intersection is not ADA compliant Multiple non-standard traffic and pedestrian signs S E Y E TH Two approach lanes, yet only one OF TRANS PO R ON I AT T DEP AR TM SITE PHOTOGRAPHS T EN S TA TE OF NEW R JE GPIGreenman-Pedersen, Inc. Engineering and Construction Services N.T.S. Sidewalks are not ADA Wide curb radius in SW corner; Wide curb radii pushed crosswalk away from intersection; Many commuters cross here to Some pedestrian signal heads are Missing sidewalk on East side get to school and the train station not functioning properly compliant M AT CH 63 8 R C EW O AKVI ST ) ) T YS E L AL V ( 8 3 6 AVE N TUSCA RD H AR V A RD AVE G I R A RD PL AVE CRESCEN T SO M M ER ( VA LL EY LI NE B CR M ATCH BA KE R ST LI NE A Limited sight distance due to roadside vegetation, road geometry (Left: NB, Right: SB) 2 5 NJDOT HSIP ROAD SAFETY AUDIT CR 638 (VALLEY ST) MAPLEWOOD & S ORANGE VILLEGE TOWNSHIPS ESSEX COUNTY No All-Red phases in a heavily trafficked, multimodal intersection Outdated, faded pedestrian signage Stop bar far from intersection S E Y E TH Lack of crosswalks and pedestrian signage OF TRANS PO R ON I AT T DEP AR TM SITE PHOTOGRAPHS T EN S TA TE OF NEW R JE GPIGreenman-Pedersen, Inc. Engineering and Construction Services N.T.S. Poor drainage conditions on many roadside inlets Broken traffic signal foundation, the foundation is not breakaway Curb cuts to accommodate trees; not ADA compliant NB Queue from Parker Ave is Outdated signal and pedestrian heads, some ramps are not ADA causing additional queues on the side streets compliant, lots of congestion, observed multiple near-collisions W JEFFER SO N RD AN D O AKL 3 5 NJDOT HSIP ROAD SAFETY AUDIT CR 638 (VALLEY ST) MAPLEWOOD & S ORANGE VILLEGE TOWNSHIPS ESSEX COUNTY SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Poor sight distance for side streets Overly complicated, redundant parking signs NB queue extending from Parker Ave past Jefferson Ave OF TRANS PO R S E Y E TH Limited sight distance for signalized intersection at Oakland Rd T EN ON I AT T DEP AR TM NE B LI M ATCH LI NE C R AVE PARKE L ELL P CRO W PL PL OD EW O EDG N N CO L LI RD AN D O AKL RD PARK M ATCH PARK ER A VE AVE C R6 3 8( VAL L E YS T ) S TA TE OF NEW R JE GPIGreenman-Pedersen, Inc. Engineering and Construction Services N.T.S. "When Children Are Present" although the speed limit is 25 MPH throughout corridor Unofficial school crossing; daycare crosses to the high school park twice a day MAPLEWOOD TOWNSHIP Construction equipment extending Poor sight distance; on-street parking extends close to the intersection into roadway, limiting driver visibility and narrowing pedestrian walkways Upheaved sidewalk; not ADA compliant SOUTH ORANGE VILLEGE TOWNSHIP NE C LI M ATCH LACKAW AN N A PL NG SHO PPI CEN TER DRW Y M ATCH 5TH ST TER XO N HI VE ND A RO LA LD ARN O LI NE D ) T YS E L VAL 8( 3 R6 C PL 4 5 NJDOT HSIP ROAD SAFETY AUDIT CR 638 (VALLEY ST) MAPLEWOOD & S ORANGE VILLEGE TOWNSHIPS ESSEX COUNTY Pavement issues & there is no known reason that Hixon Pl is a One-Way Vehicle parked on sidewalk in non-parking area Observed speeding along corridor; non-standard pedestrian crosswalks S E Y E TH Sidewalks are in poor condition and can be a tripping hazard OF TRANS PO R ON I AT T DEP AR TM SITE PHOTOGRAPHS T EN S TA TE OF NEW R JE GPIGreenman-Pedersen, Inc. Engineering and Construction Services N.T.S. Cars creep into intersection due to poor line of sight No Crosswalks available for Village Plaza or Bus stops in a Wide pedestrian crossings, Poor sight distances, Ped heads pedestrian-heavy area are blocked by street signs NE D LI PL D) AND R L OT C S 8( 3 R6 C N CO 1ST ST PL TT NE ST 2N D ST 3RD ST 4TH T MY S ADE A C LO R TAY ) T YS E L VAL 8( 3 R6 C ) AVE GE RAN S O ( 510 CR ST 2N D ST 3RD ST 4TH 1ST ST EAVE VOS AGE L L VI AZA L P 5 5 NJDOT HSIP ROAD SAFETY AUDIT CR 638 (VALLEY ST) MAPLEWOOD & S ORANGE VILLEGE TOWNSHIPS ESSEX COUNTY SITE PHOTOGRAPHS non-standard crosswalks and uneven Pedestrain, crossing from bus stop to Village Plaza, is completely hidden from the driver Complex intersection; Traffic analysis needed for the area OF TRANS PO R S E Y Sidewalk is narrow, obstructed, E TH Outdated traffic lights and T EN ON I AT T DEP AR TM M ASSEL TER M ATCH Buses stopping within the S-curve cause sight distance issues IRV I NG T AVE O N Pavement cracks within the intersection and along curblines S TA TE OF NEW R JE GPIGreenman-Pedersen, Inc. Engineering and Construction Services N.T.S. Appendix G – St raight Line Diagrams ESSEX COUNTY 638 (South to North) Mile Posts: 0.000 - 2.000 on S tr ee t d Ro a We st Pa rk er Ave n u e Pro sp e ct ee h Str Ma ri eet my S tr Be a c nd n ue d Ro a S tr ee t Ri g gs Pl ac e t d Ro a ay 700096 Aca d e ve er A la n d r No rth Te Va ll e y Stre e t Pa rk O ak d hw e ve n u ig ca n H T us tty iew A ra e Roa r n Ha Te r Ry nd a R o ad Ma y nu e nu e Mi ll bu rn A ve J Te ve O ak v as n A Pa rk m l to ld Gir ar d P la ce ho ie Pa rk A ve n ue rT r Ca Ma p pe oo en u tre e t et Fif th St re Tr Av e Ma p le w oo d Av e nu ue ay Li b er ty ri n gf d le Av en w 630 Sp et S oa Du ra Va u xh al l R o a d We stli n e A ve n ue h ig ce lR Wo od l an d R oa d Wa lto n R o a d oad Thi rd Stre e t H Primary Direction Pl a e Bu rn n el n ue tty ed o 630 Du n A ve ra nu 124 e T ux Pi er so n R o a d n Ha 638 ve er P la c on J A Sa lt W a lto n R fe rs as ld t P la ce m ie ee t ho ri n gf S tre e ve n u e Je f rT Ka thl e en Te r 78 Mi lto n tr er S pe oo ¦ ¨ § De b ra Wa y Secondary Direction Hi g hl a nd Ba k Tr Sp 630A Ke n da l A Pavement Shoulder Number of Lanes Speed Limit Street Name (1.53) 4TH (1.92) STREET Units in miles (1.86) MASSELL TER 5TH ST (1.82) ROLAND AVE (1.65) ARNOLD TER (1.59) PLACE AVENUE 630 (1.53) Maplewood Twp, Essex Co -1.0 LACKAWANNA PL (1.77) HIXON (1.53) W PARKER (1.34) CROWELL PL (1.26) EDGEWOOD PL (1.19) LINCOLN PL (1.12) ROAD PARK RD (0.96) AVENUE SOUTH CRESCENT (0.75) (0.63) TUSCAN RD HARVARD AVE (0.59) GIRARD PL (0.52) SOMMER AVE (0.46) PARK AVE (0.40) Road Overpass S PIERSON RD (0.31) BROADVIEW AVE (0.26) RYNDA RD (0.21) Road Underpass UE AVEN WIM AVC VOL Primary Direction Traffic Monitoring Sites VILLA TER (0.05) CRESTVIEW AVE Traffic Signal JEFFERSON AVE (1.23) 2 Grade Separated Interchange OAKLAND (1.05) 689 Interchange Number OAKVIEW (0.86) 33 County Road BAKER ST (0.71) NJ Route South Orange Twp, Essex Co 630 PIERSON RD (0.34) 22 Union County Line US Route Maplewood Twp, Essex Co URN MILLB (0.08) 287 Secondary Direction Interstate Route 0.0 South Orange Twp, Essex Co 1.0 Street Name 2.0 Valley Street Jurisdiction County Functional Class Urban Minor Arterial Control Section Speed Limit Number of Lanes Med. Type Med. Width Pavement Shoulder Traffic Volume Traffic Sta. ID IM - Transit Term. STP 35 None 0 38 0 14,784 (2012) 15,803 (2012) 3N5H705 110748 Structure No. Enlarged Views SRI = 07000638__ 30 2 Date last inventoried: July 2011 Page Created: June, 2015 Begin Essex County 638 MP=0.00 Federal Aid - NHS Sy I- 28 0 Gle b e S tre e t S tre e t Hi g hl a nd Fra nk for t Co n o ve r Te r A ve nu e ve n ue Fai rv ie w Ave n u e Hi ll si d e A Ave n u e Hi g h S tre et ¦ ¨ § 280 ue Ess ex Av en Ca rte re t Pl a ce tT er y St re e t No rth D a re Ful le r Te r tr ee t Ri d ge S te re e t Ce n te r St Ca r Mo n tr o se Ave n ue Mcl a u gh l in Pl ac e He yw o o d Ave n u e Tre mo n t 700097 Li n co ln Av en u e Be ll Stre e t Pa rk A ve n ue Gro ve Te r 508 t Su mm e r Str ee et Wh ite Stre e t R oa d Ir vi ng Te r Je ffe rs o n S tre 0 Be rke l ey Av en u e e Ch a rl ton Av e nu Ha rtf o rd Tre mo n t Pl ac e Te r Sp ri ng Str ee t 659 I- 28 oa d Ke a sb ey R Hi g hl a nd R oa d Ba ld w in Te r ive R oa d an d Va ll e y Ce n tra l A ve n ue Gro ve R oa d Sco tl Mi tch el l S tre et Ir vi ng Av e nu e d A ve n ue ue Tur re ll Ave n Ra ym o n A ve n ue t P la ce Ra l st o n et Co n n He n d er so n D r t n St re e et Tom p ki ns Stre For es t Stre e t nue Va ll e y Stre e t Primary Direction La n g do e e A ve Vo se Av en u e S tre et Cl a rk Ave n u O r an g Thi rd Stre e t Mile Posts: 2.000 - 5.000 Te r Na ss a u S tre et Va ll e y Stre e t Ea st C la rk Ci r 510 Secondary Direction Pa g e Arg yl e So u th b do w Me a ne k La ro o Ma in S tr ee t ESSEX COUNTY 638 (South to North) 658 Pavement Shoulder Number of Lanes Speed Limit Street Name (3.06) 658 AVENUE STREET PARK (4.95) WHITE (4.81) STREET STREET FRANKFORT ST (4.21) MINTON PL (4.16) MAIN (4.59) (4.44) MARILYN ST (4.34) GLEBE (4.31) CARY ST (4.24) (4.17) CODNER ST AVENUE 658 280 (3.06) Orange City, Essex Co 3.0 4.0 Valley Street 5.0 Scotland Road Jurisdiction Units in miles NEW ENGLAND TER (3.94) CONOVER TER WAVERLY PL (3.91) HIGHLAND AVE (3.84) MOUNTAIN VIEW AVE (3.73) FAIRVIEW AVE (3.66) HILLSIDE AVE (3.60) LINCOLN PL (3.54) AVENUE (3.38) LAUREL ST WILLOW ST (3.34) 508 South Orange Twp, Essex Co 659 280 JOYCE ST (4.13) CENTRAL (4.07) MITCHELL ST (3.99) STETSON ST (3.92) FREEMAN ST (3.82) FOREST ST (3.72) NASSAU ST (3.64) MCCHEMEY ST (3.56) CHRISTOPHER ST (3.51) TREMONT (3.44) (3.36) BEECH ST CHESTNUT ST (3.32) MORRIS ST (3.27) HEYWOOD AVE (3.23) LAWN RIDGE RD (3.17) THACHER LN 510 2.0 Street Name ARGYLE AVE (3.19) RANDOLPH PL (3.08) AVENUE HARRISON CT (2.79) IRVING AVE (2.73) TURRELL AVE (2.65) AVENUE AVENUE CONNETT PL (2.31) AENUE (2.22) Road Overpass STREET Road Underpass STREET WIM AVC VOL Primary Direction Traffic Monitoring Sites STREET Traffic Signal MONTROSE (2.95) 2 Grade Separated Interchange STEWART PL (2.80) 689 Interchange Number RAYMOND (2.53) 33 County Road 508 RALSTON (2.41) COMSTOCK PL (2.35) TAYLOR PL (2.29) NJ Route Orange City, Essex Co 510 S ORANGE V IL L A GE PL Z (2.16) 22 1ST (2.14) US Route South Orange Twp, Essex Co 2ND (2.07) 3RD (2.02) 287 Secondary Direction Interstate Route High Street County Functional Class Urban Minor Arterial Federal Aid - NHS Sy STP Control Section Speed Limit 30 25 Number of Lanes 2 4 Med. Type Med. Width Shoulder 0 38 28 0 1 22 0 Traffic Volume 15,171 (2012) Traffic Sta. ID 110749 Structure No. Enlarged Views SRI = 07000638__ 48 6 Date last inventoried: July 2011 32 0 6 Page Created: June, 2015 Pavement 2 None Ma in S tr ee t nu e Av e f ie ld Bl o om ee t g to n S tr sh in Wa t Be ll e vil le A ve nu e en ue Av ld f ie Bl o om 654 e nu Li n de n Av en u e e e nu u en ve Av yA an e Av nd hl a Hi g Me a d Te r Sh e rm d Ba ce s P la en t ee n ue Av tr e et S tr o o d A ve n le ge ri d ue yS in G 506S Ri d ge w Ba u rt Ru d d Co e nu e n Av in g to tr ee rS Bri g hto n Av enue 653 Pi ne Str ee t Ma p le Av en u e ld w ll u t Hi 506 en u e an d Av Ch e sn Hi ll cr es t R o a d t Li n co ln Stre e Cr os s S tr ee t Pl a ce W o od l ce a ce Ma rst o n Pl S Wil lo w d a le Av en u e Do u g la s R oad t tr ee Pi ne St r ee t e W a sh t re i de P la c Fra nk li n P la F ai gS et rn s rs o n Av e nu e P la ce In n e s Je ffe e Bu rd va Ma d is on d oa u en Al de n Stre e t R 669 v tA et le ou n Lo ra e ng Ba La ke s id e A ve n u e e O an St re B as om Th 700098 la c Cl o ve rh il l ee t Ard sl e y R o ad pP St r Tux de d o R oa d to Hi ll e d Do d Primary Direction e s ea Hi g h S tre et u g Av en A ve nu En fie ld Geo r ge Str ee t 671 e et Ne w Ca m br id g e R o a Ir vi ng Str ee t tr Hi g h S un W a tc h Mile Posts: 5.000 - 5.380 t Pl Secondary Direction Stre e Oxfo rd Stre e t Co ia n l um b Wa ln u t S tre e t ESSEX COUNTY 638 (South to North) r es Fo tA n ve le y Ri d ue Co u rt o Br ad St re et Pavement Shoulder Number of Lanes Speed Limit Street Name Road Underpass Road Overpass Units in miles WIM AVC VOL Primary Direction Traffic Monitoring Sites HAWTHORNE ST (5.05) Traffic Signal AVENUE 2 Grade Separated Interchange WASHINGTON (5.38) 689 Interchange Number STREET 33 County Road AVENUE NJ Route 671 ALDEN (5.23) 22 LAKESIDE (5.14) US Route Orange City, Essex Co PARKINSON TER (5.06) 287 Secondary Direction Interstate Route Orange City, Essex Co 5.0 6.0 Street Name Jurisdiction Functional Class County Speed Limit 25 Number of Lanes 2 Med. Type None 0 Pavement 32 Shoulder 6 9,687 (2012) Page Created: June, 2015 Med. Width End Essex County 638 MP=5.38 STP Control Section Traffic Sta. ID 8.0 Urban Minor Arterial Federal Aid - NHS Sy Traffic Volume 7.0 High Street 110750 Structure No. Enlarged Views SRI = 07000638__ Date last inventoried: July 2011 Appendix H – Pre-Audit Present at ion Draft Presentation Road Safety Audit: CR 638 (Valley Street), Millburn Avenue to South Orange Avenue Maplewood & S. Orange Village Townships Essex County October 26, 2017 Audit Team Introductions • Funded by Federal Highway Administration and NJDOT • NJDOT, Bureau of Transportation Data & Safety • Bicycle & Pedestrian Programs • NJTPA • Essex County • Maplewood Township • South Orange Village Township • Greenman-Pedersen, Inc., NJDOT Consultant 2 1 Draft Presentation Today’s Schedule • Welcome and Introductions 8:30a • Project Overview Presentation 10:00a 12:00p • Field Visit and Observations • Lunch and Regroup at Presentation Location • Discuss Observations 1:30p • Make Recommendations 3:00p • Adjourn 3 Highway Safety Improvement Program/ Local Safety Program • GOAL: Reduce serious injury and fatality (K+A) crashes on all of NJ’s public roads ROADWAY JURISDICTION • 40,000 centerline miles of public roads • 33% K+A crashes occur on state highways NJDOT (2,800 mi) County (6,800 mi) • 57% K+A crashes occur on local roads Municipal (29,000 mi) 7% • Achieve zero deaths on all public roads 18% • Established 2.5%/year reduction in 5-year rolling average • Performance-based goals consistent with SHSP 75% • Data-driven, strategic approach to improving highway safety 4 2 Draft Presentation Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) • 14 Emphasis Areas • Pedestrian Safety and Intersection Focus State • Top priority: lane departure, intersections, and pedestrians • 7 sub-programs including Local Safety Program • Core Federal Aid Program, NJ receives ~$57M 5 Local Safety Program (LSP) • NJDOT supports LSP: • • • • Dedication of HSIP funds Technical assistance Screening lists for MPOs Road Safety Audits • MPOs support LSP: • Local Road Safety/High Risk Rural Roads • PE/FD Assistance Program • Focus annual HSIP funding: • 40% on state highways • 60% percent on county and municipal network 6 3 Draft Presentation National Strategy – Toward Zero Deaths 5‐Year Rolling Average of Serious Traffic Injuries and Fatalities 3500 2,957 3000 2,777 2,404 Short Term Goals 2,121 2,584 2,008 1,909 2,260 2000 2,059 1,958 1,815 1,861 1500 1,725 1,769 1,640 1,682 1000 500 0 2002 Long Term Vision of Zero 1,599 10 Year Fatalities + Injuries 2500 2004 2006 2008 2010 5‐Year Rolling Average K+A Injuries 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026 2028 Year Statewide K+A Injuries at 2.5% Reduction 7 Federal Transportation Funding through the North Jersey Transportation Planning Authority The Metropolitan Planning Organization for Northern New Jersey Local Safety and High Risk Rural Roads Programs Over $98 million in funding since 2005 on County and Local Roadways Relatively quick-fix safety improvements Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) funds Network Screening Identifies locations experiencing: High crash frequencies Severe crash injuries Specific crash types such as right-angle or roadway departures Community Outreach Provides the public, local stakeholders and officials with an opportunities for provide comments and ask questions Emphasizes a data-driven, strategic approach to improving highway safety 8 4 Draft Presentation RSA Purpose • Formal safety performance examination • Qualitatively estimates and reports on potential road safety issues • Identifies safety improvement opportunities for all road users. • Independent, multidisciplinary audit team • Goals: What elements of the road may present a safety concern?: to what extent, to which road users, and under what circumstances? What opportunities exist to eliminate or mitigate identified safety concerns? 9 RSA Benefits • Pro-actively address safety • Not a replacement for: • Audited designs should produce fewer, less severe crashes • Design quality control • Identify low-cost/high-value improvements • Traffic or safety impact studies • Standard compliance • Enhance consistency in how safety is considered and promote a “safety culture” • Safety conscious planning • Provide continuous advancement of safety skills and knowledge • Traffic safety modeling efforts • Road safety inventory programs • Contribute feedback on safety issues for future projects • Support optimized savings of lives, money and time 10 5 Draft Presentation RSA Process Step 1 Identify Project Step 2 Select RSA Team Step 3 Conduct Start‐up Meeting Step 4 Perform Field Reviews Step 5 Analyze/ Report Findings Step 6 Present Findings to Owner Step 7 Prepare Formal Response Step 8 Incorporate Findings Responsibilities: RSA Team Design Team/Project Owner 11 FHWA Proven Safety Countermeasures Descriptions provided in your handouts 12 6 Draft Presentation FHWA Proven Safety Countermeasures Longitudinal Rumble Stripes/ Center Line Rumble Stripes (CLRS) Roundabout Chesterfield Township, Burlington County 13 Additional Considerations Curb Extensions Hoboken City, Hudson County Enhanced signing / pedestrian crossings 14 7 Draft Presentation Project Area • Urban Minor Arterial, undivided 2-lanes • Sidewalk on both sides • Crosswalks at most intersections • 25 mph within project limits • On street parking permitted 15 Area Map Jefferson Elementary School Begin: Millburn Ave (MP 0.08) Maplewood Village Maplewood Middle School Village Center Columbia High School Tuscan Elementary School NJ Transit Routes 25, 70, 92, 107 & 375 End: S. Orange Ave (MP 2.22) 16 8 Draft Presentation Project Area • Land Use • • • • • • Commercial/residential Detached single family Multi-story mixed use Parks & golf course 2 NJ Transit Train Stations Multiple NJ Transit Bus Stops • Surrounding Demographics © Third Place Media • • • • 14% Black or African American 72% White 7% below poverty level 32% use public transportation 17 Traffic Data (2012-2015) ADT: 15,803 – 18,571 ← 3,397 3,553 → 18 9 Draft Presentation Crash Data All Crashes 2014-2016 Pedestrian Crashes 2012-2016 • Total=218 • Total=15 • Overrepresentations: • Overrepresentations: • • • • • • • Rear End Left Turn Parked Vehicle Pedestrian At Intersections Wet/Snowy Dusk • Minor Injury • Dawn/Dusk • Wednesdays • May, October & November 19 NJTPA’s FY 2017-2018 Local Safety Program Network Screening List County Ranking Regional Corridors Intersections Pedestrian Intersections #50 S Orange Ave #71 S Orange Ave #49 Roland Ave #155 Valley St #114 2nd St #300 County: 3rd St #450 Parker Ave #557 County: 1st St #467 S Pierson Rd #511 Millburn Ave #511 Oakland Rd 20 10 Draft Presentation Histogram & Pie Charts by 0.1 Mile Edgewood Pl South Crescent Millburn Ave MP 0.08 S Pierson Rd Crash Data (2014-2016) CR 638 S. Orange Ave MP 2.22 21 Crash Data (2014-2016) 16 crashes at Millburn Ave (MP 0.08) Plan View by 0.01 Mile 18 crashes near 3rd St (MP 2.0±) Crash Count Gradient 1 4 8 9 10 16+ 22 11 Draft Presentation Crashes: RSA Project Area v. County Road System Crash Type Breakdown 46.8% 50.0% 32.4% 45.0% 40.0% 35.0% 0.5% 1.4% 0.03% 0.01% 0.5% 0.8% 4.1% 1.8% 0.0% 4.9% 5.5% 10.5% 0.4% 0.0% 0.5% 5.0% 0.9% 2.3% 10.0% 4.6% 4.1% 0.5% 3.5% 15.0% 8.7% 5.9% 20.0% 0.0% 0.0% 11.9% 12.7% 25.0% 15.6% 18.3% 30.0% 0.0% 2014-2016 RSA Project Area 2014-2016 County Road System 23 Crashes: Severity Severity (All Crashes) Fatal 0.2% 0.0% Major Injury 0.4% 0.0% Severity of Overrepresented Crash Types & Conditions 30 25 20 4.4% 2.3% Moderate Injury 15 10 20.9% 19.7% Minor Injury 5 74.1% 78.0% Property Damage Only 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 2014-2016 County Road System 2014-2016 RSA Project Area 0 Same Direction Rear End Struck Parked Vehicle Left Turn/U Pedestrian Turn Minor Injury Moderate Injury Wet Dusk At Intersections Major Injury 24 12 Draft Presentation Crashes: Light & Surface Conditions Surface Conditions (All Crashes) Other Icy Light Conditions (All Crashes) 0.9% 0.0% Unknown 2.0% 0.0% 0.5% 0.0% 24.4% Night 17.1% 2.6% 0.9% Snowy Wet 78.6% 84.6% Dry 0% 10% 20% 4.0% Dawn/Dusk 15.9% 14.5% 30% 40% 50% 2014-2016 County Road System 60% 70% 80% 90% 2014-2016 RSA Project Area 3.7% 71.1% Day 79.3% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 2014-2016 County Road System 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 2014-2016 RSA Project Area 25 Pedestrian Crash Data (2012-2016) Histogram by 0.1 Mile Plan View by 0.01 Mile 2 crashes 1 crash CR 638 Jefferson Ave Between Lackawanna Pl & 5th St 1st St 2 crashes 1 crash 26 13 Draft Presentation Pedestrian Crashes Light Condition for Pedestrian Crashes Bicycle/Pedestrian Crash Severity 100.0% 90.0% 28.8% Dark 80.0% 25.0% 70.0% 60.0% 5.4% Dawn/Dusk 50.0% 12.5% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 65.8% Daylight 62.5% 10.0% 0.0% 2012-2016 RSA Project Area Property Damage Only Minor Injury 0% 2012-2016 County Road System Moderate Injury Major Injury 10% 20% 30% 2012-2016 County Road System Fatal 40% 50% 60% 70% 2012-2016 RSA Project Area 27 Pedestrian Crashes: Temporal Data Pedestrian Crashes by Day of Week Pedestrian Crashes by Month 35% 25.0% 5 30% 3 3 20.0% 25% 3 20% 15% 2 2 10.0% 1 10% 5% 2 15.0% 0 0% 2012-2016 RSA 1 5.0% 1 2012-2016 County Rds 1 0 0.0% # Crashes 2012-2016 RSA 0 2012-2016 County Rds # Crashes 28 14 Draft Presentation Crash Statistics 5-Year Temporal 12-Year Totals 29 Crash Statistics (continued) 12-Year Totals 12-Year Totals 30 15 Draft Presentation Field Visit Itinerary • Welcome and Introductions 9:00a • Project Overview Presentation 10:30a • Field Visit and Observations  Verify Identified Issues  Observe Operations  Note Other Safety Concerns  Document Findings 12:30p • Lunch and Regroup at Presentation Location • Photographs • Checklist • Discuss Observations 2:00p • Make Recommendations  Safety First! • Use proper safety equipment 3:30p • Adjourn • Stay alert to your surroundings 31 Field Visit & Observations (pause presentation) 16 Draft Presentation Post Audit Analysis (resume presentation) RSA Schedule • Welcome and Introductions 9:00a • Project Overview Presentation 10:30a 12:30p • Field Visit and Observations • Lunch and Regroup at Presentation Location • Discuss Observations 2:00p • Make Recommendations 3:30p • Adjourn 34 17 Draft Presentation Post Audit Analysis Observations What elements of the road may present a safety concern?: to what extent, to which road users, and under what circumstances? What opportunities exist to eliminate or mitigate identified safety concerns? Recommendations • What corridor safety issues did you observe? • What localized safety issues did you observe? • What improvements would you make? • Are any of the FHWA countermeasures beneficial? 35 Next Steps • Preparation of RSA Report • Review/comments from RSA Team • Preparation of Preliminary Final Report • NJDOT review • Preparation of Final Report • Approximate timeframe: 10 weeks 36 18 Draft Presentation Thank you! Questions/Comments 19 Appendix I – Maplewood Proj ect Inf ormat ion EXCERPTS FROM: Maplewood Bikeway Network Plan December 2010 Maplewood Bikeway Network (MBN) I. Maplewood Master Plan Corridors Maplewood latest Master Plan (2004) provides for bikeway corridors to connect portions of the Township. The above graphic is Figure 5.3 of the Master Plan. Pages 71-72 of the Maplewood Master Plan state as follows: “These [corridors] are intended to guide the location of a bikeway network throughout Maplewood. Within these corridors, specific roadways and facility types should be selected and implemented through a phased implementation plan. These projects can be implemented by the township as incidental features of general roadway improvements and maintenance activities. They may also be implemented as independent projects.” The next section of this report provides a plan of specific routes to accommodate the corridors recommended above in Maplewood’s Master Plan. 10 Maplewood Bikeway Network (MBN) J. Maplewood Bikeway Network The recommended plan for Maplewood Bikeway Network is shown in the above graphic. The pink lines designate bike routes – signed shared roadways designated by special signage and pavement stenciling. The green lines reflect bike paths – off-road segments in the Waterlands area, Maplewood’s parks and selected other locations. Several of the routes are highlighted for discussion below: 11 Maplewood Bikeway Network (MBN) K. Criteria for Selection of MBN Routes Routes were selected by the Maplewood Transportation Committee Bike Subcommittee as facilitated by the Township’s consultant based on the objectives of the MBN: • • • • • • • Choose routes to serve the bikeway corridors adopted in the 2004 Master Plan; Select bikeways to connect major Township destinations; Provide connections to South Orange and Millburn; Minimize use of certain major streets; Provide shoulders for cyclists on some routes; Provide safe places to teach children to ride; and Minimize parking restrictions Applying the Criteria to Route Selection In selection of routes, busy streets such as Springfield Avenue and Boyden Avenue were not included and use of Valley Street and Parker Avenue was minimized. Two routes, Summit Avenue and Kendal Avenue, were designated as lower-traffic streets to provide locations to teach children to ride. More experienced cyclists may choose parallel routes that operate at relatively faster speeds. Shoulders may be added on many streets with a width equal to or exceeding 28 feet. Examples of routes that would benefit from shoulders include Prospect Street, Elmwood Avenue and Ridgewood Road. Other Factors Impacting Route Selection Routes were generally favored were those with: • Less traffic and lower speeds (Hickory Drive was selected for this reason); • Better sight lines (Baker Street with poor sight lines was not included); • Lesser slope (Oakview Avenue west of Prospect Street was considered too steep); • Good connectivity between key Township destinations; and • An off-road bike path option – preferred by cyclists and more likely to receive state discretionary grants. Note that Wyoming Avenue, one of Maplewood’s widest streets and one with existing shoulders, is an exception to the first criterion in this section. 16 Maplewood Bikeway Network (MBN) O. Maplewood Phase I Bikeway • Starting Point: Maplewood Ave. & Lenox Pl. in Maplewood Village • Via: Maplewood Ave., off-road segment on existing fenced path adjacent to railroad, Cottage Ct., Ridgewood Rd. • End Point: Ridgewood Rd. and Glen Ave. (start of Millburn’s Glen Ave. bikeway) This route is proposed to have the following attributes: • Delineate with “share the road” signage and pavement stenciling. Shoulders on Ridgewood Road section. • Total Length = 0.5 mile • Connects to Millburn’s bike route, which in turn connects to the Brookside Drive segment which is car-free Sunday mornings through South Mountain Reservation. Following on the next page is a measured drawing, prepared by Maplewood’s Engineering Department, of the Phase I off-road segment. 18 MATCH LIN E #1 RE-STRIPE STOP BAR, TURN LANE, AND YELLOW TAIL AS SHOWN (TYP) R40' R105' MATCH LIN E #1 NOTE: REFERENCE: 1. TOPOGRAPHIC AND PHYSICAL FEATURE INFORMATION TAKEN FROM TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING PREPARED FOR THE TOWNSHIP OF MAPLEWOOD, NEW JERSEY IN 2007. 2. PROPERTY LINES AND RIGHT-OF-WAY LINES TAKEN FROM TOWNSHIP TAX MAPS. 3. PHYSICAL FEATURE INFORMATION SUPPLEMENTED BY FIELD INVESTIGATIONS. .\PJK Signature.jpg K:\Projects\Projects\Essex County\Valley Street Intersections with Baker Street and Tuscan Road\Plans\CAD\Plans for Valley Street Intersections with Baker Street and Tuscan Road.dwg Appendix J – Sout h Orange Village Proj ect Inf ormat ion REPORT ONLY TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY For MERIDIA, VILLAGE COMMONS I, SOUTH ORANGE, LLC Meridia Village Commons Proposed Mixed Use Building 4th Street & Valley Street Block 2303, Lots 7-11 Township of South Orange Village Essex County, New Jersey Prepared by: 1904 Main Street 245 Main Street, Suite 110 Lake Como, NJ 07719 Chester, NJ 07930 (732) 681-0760 Joseph J. Staigar, PE, PP NJ PE License #30024 Craig W. Peregoy, PE NJ PE License #45880 June 19, 2017 Revised: October 6, 2017 1084-16-015T Traffic Impact Study Proposed Development – South Orange INTRODUCTION It is proposed to construct a 5 story building with 4,412 square feet of ground floor retail space, a 4,412 square foot restaurant and one hundred six (106) residential units (The Project). The site is located in the southwest quadrant of the intersection of Valley Street (CR 638) with Fourth Street, in the Township of South Orange Village, Essex County, New Jersey as shown on Figure 1 contained in Appendix A. The site is designated as Block 2303 – Lots 7-11 on the Township Tax Maps. Parking will be provided via one hundred twenty four (124) parking stalls on the lower level of the building, six (6) parallel parking spaces on Valley Street and eleven (11) parallel parking spaces on Fourth Street. Access to the proposed site will be provided via one (1) full movement driveway along Fourth Street. The property is currently occupied by four dwellings and an automotive service center, with access provided via two (2) full movement driveways along Fourth Street and six (6) full movement driveways along Valley Street. Dynamic Traffic, LLC has been retained to prepare this study to assess the traffic impact associated with the construction of The Project on the adjacent roadway network. This study documents the methodology, analyses, findings and conclusions of our study and includes:  A detailed field inspection was conducted to obtain an inventory of existing roadway geometry, traffic control, pedestrian crossings, sidewalk widths and location and geometry of existing driveways and intersections.  Existing traffic and pedestrian data was collected via manual turning movement (MTM) counts during the weekday AM and weekday PM peak periods at four intersections in the vicinity of the site.  Projections of traffic to be generated by the proposed development were prepared utilizing trip generation data as published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. Site traffic was then assigned to the adjacent street system based upon the anticipated directional distribution.  Capacity analyses were conducted for the Existing, No Build and Build conditions for the study intersection and the site driveways.  The proposed site driveway was inspected for adequacy of geometric design, spacing and/or alignment to streets and driveways on the opposite side of the street, relationship to other driveways adjacent to the development, and conformance with accepted design standards. Page 1 Traffic Impact Study Proposed Development – South Orange EXISTING CONDITIONS A review of the existing roadway conditions near the subject site was conducted to provide the basis for assessing the traffic impact of the development. This included field investigations of the surrounding roadways and intersections, collection of traffic volume data, and extensive analyses. Existing Roadway Conditions The following are descriptions of the roadways in the study area: Valley Street (CR 638) is an urban minor arterial roadway under the jurisdiction of Essex County. In the vicinity of the site the posted speed limit is 30 miles per hour and the roadway provides one travel lane in each direction with a general north/south orientation. On-street parking is permitted along both sides of the roadway with curb and sidewalk provided along both sides of the roadway. Valley Street provides a straight horizontal alignment and a relatively flat vertical alignment. The land uses along Valley Street in the vicinity of The Project are a mix of commercial and residential. Academy Street is an urban major collector roadway under the jurisdiction of the Township of South Orange Village. In the vicinity of the site the posted speed limit is 25 miles per hour and the roadway provides one travel lane in each direction with a general north/south orientation. On-street parking is permitted along the west side of the roadway with curb and sidewalk provided along both sides of the roadway. Academy Street provides a straight horizontal alignment and a relatively flat vertical alignment. The land uses along Academy Street in the vicinity of The Project are primarily residential. Fourth Street is a local roadway under the jurisdiction of the Township of South Orange Village. In the vicinity of the site the speed limit is not posted and the roadway provides one travel lane for each direction of travel with a general east/west orientation. Fourth Street to the east of Academy Street provides one travel lane for one-way travel in the westbound direction. On-street parking is permitted along the south side of the roadway with curb and sidewalk provided along both sides of the roadway. Fourth Street provides a straight horizontal alignment and an uphill vertical alignment from west to east. The roadway is approximately ¼ of a mile long traversing from Prospect Street to its terminus just west of the site at the New Jersey Transit Rail Lines. At this western terminus there is access to the PSE&G utilities substation which will remain as existing. On school days during the hours of 7:30 AM to 5:00 PM Fourth Street is closed from Academy Street to Prospect Street in front of Our Lady of Sorrows School/Church. The land uses along Fourth Street in the vicinity of The Project are primarily commercial to the west of Valley Street and primarily residential to the east of Valley Street. Third Street is a local roadway under the jurisdiction of the Township of South Orange Village. In the vicinity of the site the speed limit is not posted and the roadway provides one travel lane for each direction of travel with a general east/west orientation. On-street parking is permitted along the north side of the roadway with curb and sidewalk provided along both sides of the roadway. Third Street provides a straight horizontal alignment and an uphill vertical alignment from west to east. The roadway is approximately ½ of a mile long traversing from Prospect Street to South Ridgewood Road. The land uses along Third Street in the vicinity of The Project are a mix of commercial and residential. Page 2 Traffic Impact Study Proposed Development – South Orange Massel Terrace is a local roadway under the jurisdiction of the Township of South Orange Village. In the vicinity of the site the speed limit is not posted and the roadway provides one travel lane for each direction of travel with a general east/west orientation. On-street parking is permitted along both sides of the roadway with curb and sidewalk provided along both sides of the roadway. Massel Terrace provides a straight horizontal alignment and an uphill vertical alignment from west to east. The roadway is approximately 440 feet long traversing from Prospect Street to Academy Street. The land uses along Massel Terrace in the vicinity of The Project are primarily residential. Existing Traffic Volumes Manual turning movement (MTM) counts were conducted on Wednesday, June 7, 2017 between 7:00 AM and 9:00 AM and between 4:30 PM and 6:30 PM at the intersections of Valley Street with Fourth Street, Valley Street with Third Street, Valley Street with Massel Terrace and Academy Street with Fourth Street. Review of the collected traffic data reveals that the weekday morning peak street hour (PSH) occurs between 7:30–8:30 AM and the Evening PSH occurs between 5:15–6:15 PM. Figure 2 in Appendix A shows the existing peak hour traffic volumes at the study intersection. Existing Pedestrian Movements Pedestrian counts were also conducted on Wednesday, June 7, 2017 between 7:00 AM and 9:00 AM and between 4:30 PM and 6:30 PM at the intersections of Valley Street with Fourth Street, Valley Street with Third Street, Valley Street with Massel Terrace and Academy Street with Fourth Street. The following Table I summarizes the results of the pedestrian counts during the peak hours of the roadway. The pedestrian movements were utilized in the capacity analysis that are included in Appendix C. Table I Pedestrian Volumes Intersection Valley Street and Third Street Valley Street and Fourth Street Valley Street and Massel Terrace Fourth Street and Academy Street Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Pedestrians per Hour AM PSH PM PSH 19 17 33 18 19 20 85 15 35 21 34 12 1 1 13 3 32 18 0 0 0 0 24 9 44 5 3 3 24 1 Page 3 Traffic Impact Study Proposed Development – South Orange Existing Capacity Analysis The methodology utilized in the capacity analyses is described in the, Highway Capacity Manual 2010, published by the Transportation Research Board. In general, the term Level of Service (LOS) is used to provide a “qualitative” evaluation of capacity based upon certain “quantitative” calculations related to empirical values, such as traffic volume and intersection control. At the signalized intersections, factors that affect the various approach capacities include width of approach, number of lanes, signal “green time”, turning percentages, truck volumes, etc. However, delays cannot be related to capacity in a simple one-to-one fashion. For example, it is possible to have delays in the Level of Service “F” range without exceeding roadway capacity. Substantial delays can exist without exceeding capacity if one or more of the following conditions exist: long signal cycle lengths; a particular traffic movement experiences a long red time; or progressive movement for a particular lane group is poor. Table II describes the level of service ranges for signalized intersections. Table II Level of Service Criteria for Signalized Intersections Level of Average Control Delay Service (seconds per vehicle) A 0.0 to 10.0 B 10.1 to 20.0 C 20.1 to 35.0 D 35.1 to 55.0 E 55.1 to 80.0 F greater than 80.0 When analyzing an unsignalized intersection, it is assumed that both the major street through and right turn movements are unimpeded and have the right-of-way over all side street traffic and left turns from the major street. All other turning movements in the intersection cross, merge with, or are otherwise impeded by major street movements. Traffic delays at unsignalized intersections are determined by sequentially processing these impeded movements. Table III describes the level of service ranges for unsignalized (stop controlled) intersections. Table III Level of Service Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections Level of Average Control Delay Service (seconds per vehicle) a 0.0 to 10.0 b 10.1 to 15.0 c 15.1 to 25.0 d 25.1 to 35.0 e 35.1 to 50.0 f greater than 50.0 Page 4 Traffic Impact Study Proposed Development – South Orange All capacity analyses were performed utilizing the SYNCHRO software package. Table IV summarizes the existing levels of service (LOS) and delay in seconds per vehicle. All Capacity analysis calculation worksheets are contained in Appendix C. Table IV Existing Levels of Service Direction/ Intersection AM PSH Movement EB LTR C (22) WB LTR C (24) Valley Street and Third Street NB LTR C (22) SB LTR C (21) Overall C (22) EB LTR b (14) WB LTR c (17) Valley Street and Fourth Street NB LTR a (9) SB LTR a (9) WB LR b (14) Valley Street and Massel Terrace SB LT a (8) EB LR b (12) L b (12) Fourth Street and Academy WB Street TR b (11) NB LT a (8) PM PSH C (22) C (22) C (24) B (20) C (22) d (29) c (19) a (0) a (9) c (20) a (9) b (10) b (10) a (10) a (7) A (#) - Signalized Intersection Level of Service (seconds of delay per vehicle) a (#) - Unsignalized Intersection Level of Service (seconds of delay per vehicle) The following are discussions pertaining to each of the existing intersections analyzed. It should be noted that the existing percentage of trucks and peak hour factors were used in the existing analysis. Valley Street and Third Street Third Street intersects Valley Street to form a four-leg signalized intersection. All four approaches provide a shared left turn/through/right turn lane. The intersection has crosswalks on all four legs of the intersections with only the southwest corner having an ADA compliant detectable warning surface. Pedestrian-oriented traffic signals are provided although “Man/Hand” pedestrian signal heads are not. The sidewalks in the vicinity of this intersection range from 5’ to 8’ wide. A review of the existing analysis reveals that the intersection operates at overall acceptable level of service “C” during the AM and PM analyzed peak periods. See Table IV for the individual movement levels of service and delays. Valley Street and Fourth Street Fourth Street intersects Valley Street to form a four-leg unsignalized intersection with Fourth Street under stop control. All four approaches provide a shared left turn/through/right turn lane. The intersection has crosswalks on all four legs of the intersections with no ADA compliant detectable warning surfaces present. The sidewalks in the vicinity of this intersection range from 3’ to 4’ wide. Page 5 Traffic Impact Study Proposed Development – South Orange A review of the existing analysis reveals that the individual intersection movements operate at acceptable level of service “C” or better during the AM and PM analyzed peak periods. See Table IV for the individual movement levels of service and delays. Valley Street and Massel Terrace Massel Terrace intersects Valley Street to form an unsignalized T-intersection with Massel Terrace under stop control. The westbound approach of Massel Terrace provides a shared left turn/right turn lane. The northbound and southbound approaches of Valley Street provide a shared through/right turn lane and a shared left turn/through lane respectively. The intersection has a crosswalk to cross the Massel Terrace leg of the intersection with no ADA compliant curb ramps present. The sidewalks in the vicinity of this intersection range from 5’ to 8’ wide. A review of the existing analysis reveals that the individual intersection movements operate at acceptable level of service “C” or better during the AM and PM analyzed peak periods. See Table IV for the individual movement levels of service and delays. Fourth Street and Academy Street Fourth Street intersects Academy Street to form a four-leg unsignalized intersection with Fourth Street under stop control. The eastbound approach of Fourth Street provides a shared left turn/through lane. The westbound approach of Fourth Street provides a left turn lane and a shared through/right turn lane. The northbound and southbound approaches of Academy Street provide a shared left turn/through lane and a shared through/right turn lane respectively. The intersection has crosswalks on all four legs of the intersection with only the northeast and southeast corners having ADA compliant detectable warning surfaces. The sidewalks in the vicinity of this intersection range from 4’ to 8’ wide. A review of the existing analysis reveals that the individual intersection movements operate at favorable level of service “B” or better during the AM and PM analyzed peak periods. See Table IV for the individual movement levels of service and delays. Page 6 Traffic Impact Study Proposed Development – South Orange FUTURE CONDITIONS Traffic volumes and operational analyses were developed for both the Future No Build and Build conditions. The no build conditions provide a baseline for assessing the impact of site development traffic on the roadway system. The process of developing the No Build and Build traffic volumes and the subsequent analyses is outlined below. Regardless of whether the subject site is developed or not, traffic volumes on the surrounding roadways are expected to increase as a result of developments throughout the region. A growth rate for roadways within the study area was obtained from the NJDOT Annual Background Growth Rate Table, which indicates a growth rate of 2.0% per year. Future No Build traffic volumes were developed by applying the background growth rate of 2.0% per year for two (2) years to the study area roadways existing traffic volumes. Figure 3, in Appendix A of this report, shows the Future No Build traffic volumes. Traffic Generation Projections of future traffic volumes were developed utilizing data as published in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) publication Trip Generation, 9th Edition for Land Use Code (LUC) 223 – Mid-Rise Apartments, LUC 932 – High-Turnover (Sit-Down) Restaurant and LUC 820 – Shopping Center. Table V summarizes the projected trips generated by the proposed development utilizing the ITE data. Land Use 106 Residential Units 4,412 Square Foot Shopping Center 4,412 Square Foot Restaurant Total Table V Trip Generation AM PSH In Out Total In PM PSH Out Total 9 21 30 23 17 40 2 2 4 8 8 16 26 22 48 26 17 43 37 45 82 57 42 99 The ITE publication Trip Generation Handbook, 9th Edition, recognizes that when land uses are proximate to each other, individual land uses tend to interact, reducing the overall trip generation for the site. In order to perform a more conservative analysis no credit was taken for the “internally captured” trips associated with the individual uses. It should also be noted that, conservatively, no credit was taken for passby trips associated with the shopping center portion of the site. One of the attractive features for prospective tenants is that within a half mile of the site there is access to New Jersey Transit bus lines 92, 107 and the Morris & Essex Rail Line. However, no adjustments are made to the ITE trip rate data to account for the likely high utilization of mass transit for daily commutation purposes for the future tenants of the proposed building. Furthermore no credit was Page 7 Traffic Impact Study Proposed Development – South Orange taken for the existing use of the site which currently generates traffic. All trip generation was considered an increase over vacant land. This allows for a conservative projection of a “worst case” scenario. Once the magnitude of traffic to be generated by the site is known, it is necessary to assign that traffic to the adjacent street system. The distribution of site traffic to the surrounding roadways is based on the location of primary arterial roadways, major signalized intersections, and existing traffic patterns. Located in Appendix A, Figure 4 illustrates the site generated traffic volumes. The site generated volumes were added to the Future No Build traffic volumes to generate the Future Build traffic volumes, which are shown in Figure 5. Future Capacity Analysis Operational conditions at the study intersections were analyzed under the No Build and Build conditions and are summarized in Table VI below. Table VI Future Levels of Service AM PSH Direction/ Intersection No Movement Build Build EB LTR C (23) C (23) WB LTR C (25) C (25) Valley Street and Third Street NB LTR C (23) C (26) SB LTR C (21) C (22) Overall C (23) C (24) EB LTR b (14) e (36) WB LTR c (18) c (20) Valley Street and Fourth Street NB LTR a (9) a (9) SB LTR a (9) a (10) WB LR b (15) b (15) Valley Street and Massel Terrace SB LT a (8) a (9) EB LR b (12) b (12) L b (13) b (13) Fourth Street and Academy WB Street TR b (11) b (11) NB LT a (8) a (8) WB LT a (7) Site Driveway and Fourth Street NB R a (9) PM PSH No Build Build C (22) C (23) C (22) C (22) C (27) C (30) C (21) C (22) C (23) C (25) d (31) e (48) c (20) d (26) a (0) a (9) a (9) a (9) c (21) c (22) a (9) a (9) b (11) b (11) b (10) b (10) a (10) b (10) a (8) a (8) a (7) a (9) A (#) - Signalized Intersection Level of Service (seconds of delay per vehicle) a (#) - Unsignalized Intersection Level of Service (seconds of delay per vehicle) Page 8 Traffic Impact Study Proposed Development – South Orange Valley Street and Third Street With the addition of the site traffic the intersection will continue to operate at overall acceptable level of service “C” or better during the AM and PM peak hours, maintaining the no build levels of service. See Table VI for the individual movement levels of service and delays. Valley Street and Fourth Street With the addition of the site traffic the individual intersection movements will operate at level of service “E” or better during the AM and PM peak hours. See Table VI for the individual movement levels of service and delays. It should also be noted that the sidewalks along the property frontage will be improved and widened and that ADA compliant curb ramps will be installed in the southwest corner of the intersection. Valley Street and Massel Terrace With the addition of the site traffic the individual intersection movements will continue to operate at acceptable level of service “C” or better during the AM and PM peak hours, maintaining the no build levels of service. See Table VI for the individual movement levels of service and delays. Academy Street and Fourth Street With the addition of the site traffic the individual intersection movements will continue to operate at favorable level of service “B” or better during the AM and PM peak hours, maintaining the no build levels of service. See Table VI for the individual movement levels of service and delays. Fourth Street and the Site Driveway The site driveway is proposed to intersect Fourth Street to form a three-leg unsignalized intersection with the site driveway under stop control. The eastbound and westbound approaches of Fourth Street will provide a shared through/right turn lane and a shared left turn/through lane respectively. The northbound approach of the site driveway will provide one lane for left and right turns. With the addition of the site traffic the individual intersection movements will operate at favorable level of service “A” during the AM and PM analyzed peak periods. See Table VI for the individual movement levels of service and delays. Access to the PSE& G substation exists to the west of the site driveway and will remain. It is expected that this minimally utilized access point will continue to function adequately in its existing location. Page 9 Traffic Impact Study Proposed Development – South Orange SITE PLAN Site Access The site plan was reviewed with respect to the site access and on-site circulation design. As noted previously, access to The Project will be provided via one (1) full movement driveway along Fourth Street. The proposed access layout is an improvement over the existing layout which currently provides two (2) full movement driveways along Valley Street and six (6) full movement driveways along Fourth Street. A loading zone will be provided along Fourth Street and loading/unloading will be conducted during off peak hours of the surrounding roadways. Page 10 Traffic Impact Study Proposed Development – South Orange FINDINGS & CONCLUSIONS Findings Based upon the detailed analyses as documented herein, the following findings are noted:  The proposed 5,152 square feet of retail space, 5,093 square foot restaurant and 106 residential units will generate 42 entering trips and 48 exiting trips during the morning peak hour and 62 entering trips and 47 exiting trips during the evening peak hour. This is based on a conservative assessment of trip generation with no credit for mass transit usage, internal trips or passby trips.  Access to the site will be provided via one (1) full movement driveway along Fourth Street. Sidewalks and pedestrian amenities will be upgraded along the subject property frontages.  With the addition of the site generated traffic, the intersection of Valley Street with Third Street will continue to operate at overall acceptable level of service “C” or better during the AM and PM peak hours, maintaining the no build levels of service.  With the addition of the site generated traffic, the individual intersection movements of Valley Street with Fourth Street will operate at level of service “E” or better during the AM and PM peak hours.  With the addition of the site generated traffic, the individual intersection movements of Valley Street with Massel Terrace will continue to operate at acceptable level of service “C” or better during the AM and PM peak hours, maintaining the no build level of service.  With the addition of the site generated traffic, the individual intersection movements of Academy Street with Fourth Street will continue to operate at acceptable level of service “B” or better during the AM and PM peak hours, maintaining the no build level of service.  With the addition of the site generated traffic, the individual intersection movements of Fourth Street and the site driveway will operate at favorable level of service “A” during the AM and PM peak hours.  The on-site parking is compatible with roadway traffic as required by the redevelopment plan.  As proposed, The Project’s site driveways have been designed to provide for safe and efficient movement of vehicles on-site. Conclusions Based upon our Traffic Impact Study as detailed in the body of this report, it is the professional opinion of Dynamic Traffic LLC that the adjacent street system of the Township of South Orange Village and County of Essex will not experience any significant degradation in operating conditions with the construction of The Project. The site driveway is located to provide safe and efficient access to the adjacent roadway system. Page 11 1/13/16 DRAFT South Orange Bicycling Network Shared Lane Empty Striped shoulders Bike Lane, one way Greenway Park Trail Woods Trail Seton Hall access School Roads SO Boundary 1/13/16 DRAFT SO Bicycle Network PB Masterplan Element Shared Lane Empty Striped shoulders Bike Lane Greenway Seton Hall access SO Boundary 1/13/16 DRAFT South Orange Bicycling Network Depicting surrounding town networks Shared Lane Empty Striped shoulders Bike Lane, one way Maplewood adjusted Greenway Seton Hall access Park Trail School Roads Woods Trail SO Boundary Possible surrounding town connections 1/13/16 DRAFT South Orange Bicycling Network Stage – 1 Shared Lane Empty Striped shoulders Bike Lane, one way Maplewood adjusted Greenway Seton Hall access Park Trail School Roads Woods Trail SO Boundary Added Network Elements 1/13/16 DRAFT South Orange Bicycling Network Stage - 2 Shared Lane Empty Striped shoulders Bike Lane, one way Maplewood adjusted Greenway Seton Hall access Park Trail School Roads Woods Trail SO Boundary Added Network Elements 1/13/16 DRAFT South Orange Bicycling Network Stage - 3 Shared Lane Empty Striped shoulders Bike Lane, one way Maplewood adjusted Greenway Seton Hall access Park Trail School Roads Woods Trail SO Boundary Added Network Elements 1/13/16 DRAFT South Orange Bicycling Network Stage - 4 Shared Lane Empty Striped shoulders Bike Lane, one way Maplewood adjusted Greenway Seton Hall access Park Trail School Roads Woods Trail SO Boundary Added Network Elements 1/13/16 DRAFT South Orange Bicycling Network Stage – 5 (complete) Shared Lane Empty Striped shoulders Bike Lane, one way Maplewood adjusted Greenway Seton Hall access Park Trail School Roads Woods Trail SO Boundary Added Network Elements 1/13/16 DRAFT 1 4 1 2 2 2 3 1 2 3 4 3 4 1 2 4 1 1 1 4 4 2 2 3 2 3 4 3 3 3 1 3 3 4 3 3 1 2 1 1 3 1 3 4 1 1 1 4 3 1 1 4 3 3 1 3 2 3 1 1 3 3 3 1 3 1 1 1 4 4 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 2 4 1 1 1 1 1 3 4 3 1 3 1 South Orange Bicycling Network Workup of Signage & Pavement Marking Quantities 3 1 3 4 3 1 1 1 3 3 1 3 4 1 1 3 1 1 4 4 1 1 1 3 1 3 1 Shared Lane Empty Striped shoulders Bike Lane, one way 3 No. of Wayfinding Indications Greenway Seton Hall access Park Trail School Roads Woods Trail SO Boundary 1 49 2 10 3 38 4 19 = 248 From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Walter Clarke Steponanko, Julia Howard Levison; Salvatore Renda Re: Essex County CR 638 Road Safety Audit Scheduled: October 26, 2017 Monday, October 30, 2017 3:48:54 PM Julia, I am now pasting in notes regarding Valley Street (and 3rd St, South Orange Ave) from Dan Petersen who is a resident and PE who runs our Transportation Advisory Committee. I thought these might be helpful in addition to your own notes and the field observations regarding these areas. Sal, We discussed the Third & Valley intersection at yesterday's SOTAC. A couple of things came out of this. We understand that Essex County will shortly begin working on the reconstruction of Valley St. Presumably that would permit some modifications of the striping and signaling at Third & Valley . We discussed the option of including a Nb Left turn pocket. This was thought to be useful We also discussed the option of including a Sb Left turn pocket, The need for this was thought to be less. Either of these would require changes to the signal heads, and may require an upgrade of the cabinet equipment. We also discussed options of Wb and Eb left turn pockets. These were thought to not be warranted nor particularly useful given the lower volumes and would introduce turning radius problems for the Wb to Nb bus movements. A sight distance issue for Sb right turning vehicles striking Eb then Sb pedestrians that are entering the west crosswalk was surfaced by a member of the community. I believe that Howard suggested a conversation with the Valley National Bank to trim back their large hedge there at. Regarding the ped heads, subject of the above emails, we would recommend NOT installing countdown type heads as it leads to drivers accelerating to make the light (at least not on the Nb/Sb directions). We did advocate installing ADA compliant ped buttons. With that in mind though, we recommended that the signals automatically display white walk phases regardless of the buttons being pressed. I understand that is not implemented in Essex's signals as a matter of course. The absence of an automatic white walk signal induces pedestrians to go ahead and cross whenever they feel they can manage it, which is a recipe for serious accidents. [I noted that we see this at the Parker and Valley signal, which is particularly problematic given the volume of High School students who cross there and are oblivious to the ped buttons]. Further to the conversation on Valley, we discussed relocation of the west curb alongside the Sb direction between Village Plaza and First to eliminate the ability to pass hung-up Sb left turning vehicles on the right, and the resulting threat to Wb crossing pedestrians thereat. We also discussed making the Sb Scotland right lane "Right Only" at its approach to SO Ave and providing a bump out on the opposite SW corner to protect what would then become a strip of parallel parking along the western edge of Valley continuing to First Ave. As part of that discussion, we surfaced a town objective to transform Village Plaza into public space. We also discussed an alternative to widen sidewalks to support al fresco dining through the space alongside Valley instead of providing the aforementioned parking. With all these concepts, the introduction of a crosswalk on the north side of the First & Valley intersection was supported, particularly given the Nb bus stop on the east side of Valley. We also discussed whether the signal cycle lengths of SO Ave and Scotland/Valley and Third & Valley were the same and whether phase coordination of Sb movements at the former and Nb movements at the later could reduce the number of Nb & Sb vehicles simultaneously present at the Valley and First intersection, facilitating Sb lefts and Nb lefts.at different times. Returning to Third, it was pointed out that vehicles leaving the new parking deck have a VERY difficult time negotiating the traffic on Third and on Sloan as well as being able to see pedestrians making their various movements. There apparently are some REAL sight distance issues that might (as suggested) warrant installation of a mirror. Finally, and related to the previous, we still need to get SOMETHING between the trestle columns to prevent pedestrians filtering from north to south (or vice versa). Lastly, it was noted that we need to add the missing pedestrian crossing signs at the crosswalk west of the trestle. Let me know if you should have any questions or would like to follow up. Kind regards, Dan Peterson, PE Chair, SOTAC On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Steponanko, Julia <jsteponanko@gpinet.com> wrote: Good Afternoon, The Road Safety Audit (RSA) for CR 638 (Valley Street) is scheduled for Thursday, October 26, 2017 from 8:30a to 3:00p and will start at the Maplewood Township Municipal Building, 574 Valley Street, Maplewood, NJ. The RSA will be held rain or shine. NJDOT / NJTPA request and appreciate your attendance or the attendance of a representative from your agency/department. Your involvement in this meeting is important and will result in specific recommendations to increase the safety at this location. An agenda and background materials are attached for review. Additional materials will be provided prior to the RSA via a project-specific SharePoint site (a link will be provided in a separate email). Meeting participants are encouraged to drive the site on their own and to document comments regarding the condition of the location prior to October 26. If you have additional historical information and/or reports it would be helpful for you to bring them to the meeting. Please note: on the day of the RSA, we will meet first at the Maplewood Township Municipal Building and then go to the site as a group. Please dress appropriately for safety and weather (i.e. safety vest, umbrella, etc.) as required by your agency for a field visit and as necessary. A select number of safety vests are available if you do not have one or cannot obtain one from your agency. Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions. Thank you, Julia Steponanko, P.E. Engineer 100 Corporate Drive, Suite 301, Lebanon, NJ 08833 o +1 (908) 236-9001 | d +1 (908) 287-2720 jsteponanko@gpinet.com<mailto:jsteponanko@gpinet.com> | www.gpinet.com<http://www.gpinet.com> [LinkedIn]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/greenman-pedersen-inc-? trk=top_nav_home> [Youtube]<https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJ7XgY1qUwHqmA0vDO0xADQ> [Twitter]<https://twitter.com/GPI1966> [Facebook]<https://www.facebook.com/GPI1966/?ref=hl> [cid:image005.png@01D34360.323F7FA0] [cid:image006.png@01D34360.323F7FA0] An Equal Opportunity Employer This communication and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity named as the addressee. It may contain information which is privileged and/or confidential under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient or such recipient's employee or agent, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, copy or disclosure of this communication is strictly prohibited and to notify the sender immediately. -Walter Clarke Trustee, Village of South Orange wclarke@southorange.org All correspondence conducted by email to South Orange officials or employees at the southorange.org domain or about municipal business to any email address to or from any official or employee are subject to the provisions and exceptions set forth in the New Jersey Open Public Records Act, N.J.S.A. 47:1A-1 et. seq. In short: Assume this email correspondence is public information. Appendix K – Road Owner Response: Essex Count y