This is just a matter of perspective. Only a few projects I've worked on had a boost dependency. I wonder if we can include it and have it only turn on if boost is already used on the project...
On 28/01/2010 3:48 AM, Joel Fielder wrote: > Clark Gaebel wrote: >> That's the same one I just posted, but had a boost dependency so was >> "rejected" by the community. > Not by everyone :) Every project I've worked on in the last two years > has a boost dependency. > > Was it the embedded gang that didn't want it? There was a separate > argument as well - "it's difficult to build boost" - I don't accept > that. We're catering for serious developers here! And besides, it's > not difficult. > > Can it go on a -D? Surely if it's easy to disable or enable then the > only issue to discuss is whether it's a useful feature. > > Joel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation > Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business > Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts > Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com > _______________________________________________ > unittest-cpp-devel mailing list > unittest-cpp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unittest-cpp-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away. http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com _______________________________________________ unittest-cpp-devel mailing list unittest-cpp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unittest-cpp-devel
