Vlad wrote: > Are my posts to the group getting lost somehow? I don't think so, I'm getting them ok :)
> I listened to the feedback on v1 and subsequently [snip] THERE IS NO BOOST > DEPENDENCY ANYMORE. > Yes, I remember. It feels like you had to waste time reinventing a wheel! By maintaining a "no-boost" policy, future contributors might need to reinvent stuff instead of concentrating on the good work of improving the library. We should focus on what we're good at and let the boost guys do their stuff. The whole point of boost is to be re-used and ignoring it feels wrong to me. Surely the best compromise is to use configure and -D to enable or disable features. Configure exists to solve problems like this! Why ignore the most suitable tool? Anyway, all of this is masking the real issue which needs to be agreed - is the feature useful? I vote yes. Whether it's your v1 or v2 implementation is a maintainer's decision, in my opinion. Joel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away. http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com _______________________________________________ unittest-cpp-devel mailing list unittest-cpp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unittest-cpp-devel
