Hazards in Drinking-Water Supply and Waste Management: 3.1 Microbial Risks: Waterborne Infectious Disease
Hazards in Drinking-Water Supply and Waste Management: 3.1 Microbial Risks: Waterborne Infectious Disease
Hazards in Drinking-Water Supply and Waste Management: 3.1 Microbial Risks: Waterborne Infectious Disease
may allow transport of pathogenic organisms for long distances and depths. A further cause of contamination of drinking-water is through the improper storage of water in household storage tanks and cisterns, and in smaller containers after it has been drawn. This is a common source of pathogens in drinkingwater in developing countries.
surfaces in contact with water as biofilms, and also on foods. They can also include a broad spectrum of opportunistic pathogen microorganisms such as Aeromonas, Flavobacterium, Serratia, Pseudomonas and Klebsiella, but there is no evidence in the general public of an association of any of these organisms with gastrointestinal infection through ingestion of drinking-water (WHO 2004a); there may be concerns with some severely immunocompromised persons and hospital environments (Bartram et al. 2003). They are found in all waters without residual disinfectant, including bottled waters, and on carbon filters and other treatment devices and surfaces. Most heterotrophs are not harmful to healthy persons, but they can be a nuisance by generating tastes and odours or discoloration of water supplies. The principal determinants of growth of heterotrophs are lack of disinfectant residual, warm temperature, availability of nutrients including organic carbon, and stagnation. They are measured by aggregate heterotrophic plate count (HPC) tests that detect a wide range of organisms, including many bacteria and fungi. High counts are more likely to be indicative of biofilms and lack of cleanliness in the system and availability of nutrients. In the absence of indicators of sanitary significance (e.g. E. coli), HPC organisms in themselves are not indicative of faecal contamination. Legionella Legionella are among the exceptions to harmless growth organisms in distributed water, and they are not measured by HPC tests. Legionella can grow to significant numbers in warm waters, hot water heaters, hot tubs, hot water lines and shower heads, and probably in the plumbing systems of large buildings, and in cooling towers for air conditioner heat exchangers. Special precautions are required to prevent and control Legionella in hospitals and health care facilities, because aerosols from showers, spas and cooling systems are a route of infection and those facilities contain high-risk populations. Legionella grow well in water at temperatures in the range of about 25 C to 50 C. Preventive and remedial controls are essential, especially in hospitals and health care facilities (SurmanLee 2006). The WHO Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality indicates that the water temperature should be maintained outside the range of 2550 C, at which Legionella proliferates (WHO 2004a); however, hot water temperatures above 50 C may also present a scalding risk to young children and the elderly (see section 3.3). Pseudomonas aeruginosa Pseudomonas aeruginosa microorganisms also grow in piped plumbing and distribution systems and on devices under the conditions cited above. They can cause a range of infections but rarely cause serious illness in healthy individuals. They are a significant problem in hospital environments where the organism can colonize damaged sites such as burn and surgical wounds, the respiratory tracts
12
of susceptible people and physically damaged eyes, and they have caused skin infections in hot tubs and spas. Cleaning of contact lenses with contaminated solution can cause a type of keratitis. Ingestion of drinking-water is not an important source of infection (WHO 2004a).
13
surface water. Unfortunately, the groundwater from many of these shallow tube wells was contaminated with arsenic and this was not determined before the wells were put into service. It has been estimated that over 40 million people in Bangladesh are exposed to potentially risky levels of arsenic in water. The WHO guideline value for arsenic is 10 parts per billion; however, some countries use 50 parts per billion as an interim goal due the difficulty and cost of removing arsenic from drinking-water. Fluoride is another natural water component that has caused serious consequences when it is present in excessive amounts. At recommended values it has beneficial effects by reducing tooth decay (guideline value is 1.5 milligrams per litre, but national regulators should also take into account climatic conditions, fluoride intake from other sources and total water consumed). At slightly higher consumption levels fluoride can cause discoloration of tooth enamel, and at even higher levels (greater than about 14 milligrams per day) serious adverse skeletal effects occur. Nitrate and nitrite in excess are a particular risk to infants, causing methaemoglobinaemia, which may result in morbidity and death from short exposures. The WHO guidelines are 50 milligrams per litre for nitrate and 3 milligrams per litre for nitrite, and the sum of the ratios of each to its guideline value should not exceed 1 (WHO 2004a). Nitrate and nitrite are usually present in water contaminated with sewage, septic tank effluent or agricultural runoff. Combined exposure to nitrate or nitrite and gastrointestinal disease-causing microorganisms seems to cause the greatest risk of methaemoglobinaemia. Epidemiological studies of environmental contaminants are usually driven by concerns arising from episodes of exposure or evidence of chronic exposure. However, attempts to understand the epidemiology of chemical contamination of drinking-water reveal a number of complex issues that make such studies difficult to carry out. These issues include: the fact that drinking-water is seldom the principal source of exposure, except for arsenic and fluoride in some cases; the wide variation in the amount of contamination from non-drinkingwater sources; difficulty in measuring dietary concentrations; difficulty in accurately defining the duration and magnitude of human exposure; the relative impact of other factors besides chemicals that may contribute to similar health risks. A poor assessment of relative risks sometimes makes it difficult for officials to make good public health decisions. They should rely on recognized national and international health authorities and make use of solid background information
14
such as the WHO Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality as guides for these matters (WHO 2004a). Drinking-water is drawn from an environment that changes constantly as a community develops. Therefore, it is increasingly important that there is constant awareness of developing sources of potential contamination from industry, waste disposal or agricultural practices, or changes in urbanization patterns. Medical authorities, environmental epidemiologists, toxicologists, chemists, engineers and exposure analysts need to effectively communicate and work collaboratively to help risk managers determine which environmental hazards are real, to help regulators make sensible and realistic standards and to help policy-makers make the best environmental policy and water management decisions. The WHO Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality provide comprehensive and up-to-date guidance to decision-makers by providing consensus recommendations developed by international experts from all of those disciplines.
15
washbasin 41 C; bath 44 C; and supervised bath 46 C (see sections 3.1.4 and 14.3.1) (IPHE 2005). Some plumbers have argued that reducing water temperature is not a simple matter. The following potential disadvantages must be taken into account: The cost of storage of larger quantities of lower temperature hot water may be higher than that of smaller quantities of hotter water. The water may not be hot enough for other purposes, such as washing kitchen dishes. Storage of tepid water may introduce a risk of bacterial growth (Legionella, Mycobacterium avium and Pseudomonas aeruginosa). The ideal solution is to maintain a reservoir of relatively hot water, but to ensure that high-temperature water cannot be accessed in shower or bath taps. This can be done with a thermostatically controlled mixing valve at the bath or shower.
3.3.3 Corrosion
All water is corrosive in some circumstances, but excessive corrosion is a serious economic and potential health problem. It may lead to structural failures and deterioration of chemical and microbiological quality, including exceedance of guideline values for lead, copper and iron. Corrosion is partial dissolution of any (especially metal) materials in the plumbing system. It can be caused by interactive water quality factors including pH, insufficient or excess alkalinity, temperature and galvanic action. Corrective actions are sometimes complex and may involve management of calcium, carbonate and bicarbonate, dissolved oxygen, and especially maintaining the appropriate pH, which should usually be in the approximate range of 7 to 8.5 to minimize corrosion.
3.3.4 Incrustation
Water containing excessive amounts of bicarbonates, carbonates or iron has a tendency to deposit minerals on the pipe surface. These minerals are solid and difficult to remove without mechanical cleaning, which is costly. This mineral deposition reduces the internal volume of the pipe and thus reduces the flow
16
capacity; sometimes this leads to total blockage. In addition, this irregular surface can become a locus for biofilms and can harbour microorganisms, shielding them from contact with disinfectant. It can also cause excessive disinfectant demand.
17