Ued 496 Carmen Stephanie Final Evaluation Part 1 Aes
Ued 496 Carmen Stephanie Final Evaluation Part 1 Aes
Ued 496 Carmen Stephanie Final Evaluation Part 1 Aes
Stephanie Carmen
Q2: Internship Start Date
09-05-14
Q3: Internship End Date
10-17-14
Q4: School
Arrowhead Elementary School
Q5: District
Virginia Beach Public Schools
Q6: State
Virginia
Q7: Evaluator's Name
Cheryl Gould
Q8: Evaluator's Position
Director of Student Teaching
COMPLETE COMPLETE
Collector: Collector: New Link New Link (Web Link) (Web Link)
Started: Started: Monday, October 20, 2014 9:59:28 AM Monday, October 20, 2014 9:59:28 AM
Last Modified: Last Modified: Monday, October 20, 2014 11:00:34 AM Monday, October 20, 2014 11:00:34 AM
Time Spent: Time Spent: 01:01:06 01:01:06
IP Address: IP Address: 216.54.92.22 216.54.92.22
PAGE 1: Personal Information
PAGE 2: Instructional Planning/Delivery: Active, Successful Student Participation
#8
1 / 4
Final Evaluation by University Director of Student Teaching: Site 1 (rev. 2011) SurveyMonkey
Q9: Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas
below.
Students are actively engaged in learning. Above Average
Students are successful in learning. Above Average
Students behaviors indicate learning is at a high
cognitive level.
Satisfactory
Students are self-directed/self-initiated as appropriate
to lesson objectives.
Above Average
Students are connecting learning to work and life
applications, both within the discipline and with other
disciplines.
Above Average
Appropriate pace, sequencing, and variety of activities. Satisfactory
Value and importance of content is emphasized. Satisfactory
Appropriate questioning and inquiry techniques are
used.
Satisfactory
Available technology is used appropriately and
effectively.
Satisfactory
Instruction has been designed to be responsive to
learner needs (differentiated readiness, interest,
learner modality) if appropriate.
Satisfactory
Lesson activities have been designed to promote
retention and transfer.
Satisfactory
Q10: Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas
below.
Instruction is based on objectives and core curriculum
demands.
Above Average
Content is learner-centered. Above Average
Strategies promote critical thinking/problem-solving. Above Average
Strategies include motivational techniques. Satisfactory
Strategies are aligned. Above Average
PAGE 3: Instructional Planning/Delivery: Learner-Centered Instruction
PAGE 4: Instructional Planning/Delivery: Evaluation and Feedback on Student Progress
2 / 4
Final Evaluation by University Director of Student Teaching: Site 1 (rev. 2011) SurveyMonkey
Q11: Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas
below.
Academic progress is monitored and assessed using
formal and informal assessments.
Satisfactory
Assessment and feedback are aligned with goals,
objectives, and strategies.
Above Average
Assessment strategies are appropriate. Satisfactory
Student learning is reinforced. Satisfactory
Students receive constructive feedback. Satisfactory
Teacher provides opportunities for relearning and re-
evaluation.
No Opportunity to Observe
Q12: Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas
below.
Teacher effectively implements discipline
management.
Above Average
Teacher establishes climate that promotes self-
discipline and self-direction.
Above Average
Teacher interacts with students equitably. Above Average
Teacher specifies expectations for behavior. Above Average
Teacher intervenes and re-directs behavior. Above Average
Teacher reinforces desired behavior. Above Average
Teacher uses equitable instructional materials. Above Average
Teacher effectively manages materials, time, and
transitions during lesson.
Satisfactory
PAGE 5: Instructional Planning/Delivery: Mgmt of Student Discipline, Instr Strategies, Time & Materials
PAGE 6: Professional Communication
3 / 4
Final Evaluation by University Director of Student Teaching: Site 1 (rev. 2011) SurveyMonkey
Q13: Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas
below.
Appropriate/accurate written communication with
students.
No Opportunity to Observe
Appropriate/accurate verbal and non-verbal
communication with students.
Above Average
Encourages reluctant students; plans for special
needs.
Above Average
Q14: Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas
below.
Plans and directs activities of classroom assistants
including paraprofessionals, volunteers, and tutor.
No Opportunity to Observe
Modifies performance based on personal and
professional critiques.
Satisfactory
Demonstrates flexibility. Above Average
Demonstrates initiative in planning, management, and
professional interactions.
Satisfactory
Maintains confidentiality. No Opportunity to Observe
Demonstrates effective collaboration in one-to-one and
small group interactions.
Satisfactory
Fosters trust in relationships with students, families,
and colleagues.
Above Average
Receives and responds to constructive feedback. Above Average
Q15: Comments on teacher candidate's effectiveness of overall instruction, use of developmentally
appropriate strategies, ability to lead the class, professionalism, attitudes, and demeanor throughout
the period of observation:
Ms. Carmen continues to learn and grow as a student teacher and future educator. She has shown
improvement in several areas in just a few short weeks. She is a caring educator to whom students respond
well. Her strengths are implementing behavioral and classroom management strategies.
PAGE 7: Professional and Ethical Behavior
4 / 4
Final Evaluation by University Director of Student Teaching: Site 1 (rev. 2011) SurveyMonkey