Monthly Professional Learning
Monthly Professional Learning
Monthly Professional Learning
August
Activities
During monthly meeting:
Pass out student test score data from previous year and perform a See-ThinkWonder visible thinking routine to encourage teachers to identify strengths
and weaknesses of students
Introduce school improvement goals for the year
Introduce professional learning format, divide into teams, and develop norms
for the year (as defined previously)
September
During monthly staff meeting:
(Lesson Study #1)
Introduce a few sample reading comprehension strategies for inclusion in
lesson design for the first round of the lesson study.
Provide 45 minutes of planning time for lesson #1.
Teachers will follow the lesson design template created by Ertle, Chokshi, and
Fernandez (2001).
Extra work:
Teacher teams will be asked to submit lesson plan by September 30 in order to
ensure they have been completed accurately.
October
One hour during school:
(Lesson Study #1)
Each teacher team will collaborate to find an hour to observe the model lesson
taught by one teacher in the team.
Teachers will observe student engagement, lesson effectiveness, and
interview students for feedback.
Model teacher will administer an assessment at the end of the hour (or during
the next class period) in order to measure student learning.
All other teachers will teach the lesson similarly to the way the model teacher
taught it and collect similar data.
After school (once all teachers have collected data):
Teachers will gather to analyze data and provide feedback to the model
teacher about the effectiveness of the observed lesson.
Teacher teams will use the protocol set forth by Chokshi, et al. (2001) in order
to facilitate productive discussion.
Extra work:
Teachers will submit collective student test data and analysis of effectiveness
to administrators for approval.
November
(Reflect and Plan
for Future)
December
During monthly staff meeting:
(Lesson Study #2)
Provide one hour of planning time for lesson #2.
Teachers will follow the lesson design template created by Ertle, Chokshi, and
Fernandez (2001).
Extra work:
Teacher teams will be asked to submit lesson plan by December 20 in order to
ensure they have been completed accurately.
January
One hour during school:
(Lesson Study #2)
Each teacher team will collaborate to find an hour to observe the model lesson
taught by one teacher in the team.
Teachers will observe student engagement, lesson effectiveness, and
interview students for feedback.
Model teacher will administer an assessment at the end of the hour (or during
the next class period) in order to measure student learning.
All other teachers will teach the lesson similarly to the way the model teacher
taught it and collect similar data.
After school (once all teachers have collected data):
Teachers will gather to analyze data and provide feedback to the model
teacher about the effectiveness of the observed lesson.
Teacher teams will use the protocol set forth by Chokshi, et al. (2001) in order
to facilitate productive discussion.
Extra work:
Teachers will submit collective student test data and analysis of effectiveness
to administrators for approval.
February
During monthly staff meeting:
(General Building
This meeting will be reserved for general building purposes. For instance,
Business)
teacher training for proctoring the SAT will occur during this meeting.
At the end of the meeting, teachers will be asked to either (a) select a second
reading strategy to investigate or (b) choose to implement the same reading
strategy to reevaluate its effectiveness.
March
During monthly staff meeting:
(Lesson Study #3)
Provide one hour of planning time for lesson #3.
Teachers will follow the lesson design template created by Ertle, Chokshi, and
Fernandez (2001).
Extra work:
Teacher teams will be asked to submit lesson plan by March 30 in order to
ensure they have been completed accurately.
April
One hour during school:
(Lesson Study #3)
Each teacher team will collaborate to find an hour to observe the model lesson
taught by one teacher in the team.
Teachers will observe student engagement, lesson effectiveness, and
interview students for feedback.
Model teacher will administer an assessment at the end of the hour (or during
the next class period) in order to measure student learning.
All other teachers will teach the lesson similarly to the way the model teacher
taught it and collect similar data.
After school (once all teachers have collected data):
Teachers will gather to analyze data and provide feedback to the model
teacher about the effectiveness of the observed lesson.
Teacher teams will use the protocol set forth by Chokshi, et al. (2001) in order
to facilitate productive discussion.
May
(Collect Data and
Summarize
Findings)
June
(Present
Findings)
Extra work:
Teachers will submit collective student test data and analysis of effectiveness
to administrators for approval.
During monthly staff meeting:
Teachers will be given the hour to collect and analyze their data from the
three lesson studies conducted throughout the year.
Teacher teams will be asked to summarize their findings about the
effectiveness of each of their reading comprehension strategies and prepare a
short (3-5 minute) presentation about their implementation. Presentations
should include any details about the lesson and data to support conclusions.
During monthly staff meeting:
Teachers will present their conclusions about their reading comprehension
strategies to the entire building. This will encourage collaboration between
departments and allow for further exposure to a variety of reading strategies
and techniques for teaching them.
After the staff meeting:
Teachers will complete a short survey regarding the perceived effectiveness of
the program. They will respond to the following questions on a range of
Strongly Disagree to Strongly Agree and explain their responses:
The amount of time spent on this initiative was adequate to enhance my
professional expertise on the matter.
I felt comfortable collaborating with my colleagues through the process.
This professional learning experience helped open a professional dialogue
between my colleagues and myself.
I feel comfortable using the strategies discussed throughout the year and
presented at the final meeting.
I have implemented reading strategies in my teaching throughout the year
outside of the required lesson studies.
I am interested in continuing a similar model of professional learning next
year (not necessarily involving reading comprehension).