1

U.S.
Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
National Institute of Justice

Law Enforcement and Corrections Standards and Testing Program
Guide for the Selection of Personal Protective

Equipment for Emergency First Responders
NIJ Guide 102–00
Volume I
November 2002
U.S. Department of Justice
810 Seventh Street N.W.
Washington, DC 20531
John Ashcroft
Attorney General
Deborah J. Daniels
Assistant Attorney General
Sarah V. Hart
Director, National Institute of Justice
For grant and funding information, contact:

Department of Justice Response Center
800–421–6770
Office of Justice Programs National Institute of Justice

World Wide Web Site World Wide Web Site
http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/nij
U.S. Department of Justice
Guide for the Selection of Personal Protective Equipment for

Emergency First Responders
NIJ Guide 102−00, Volume I
Dr. Alim A. Fatah1

John A. Barrett 2
Richard D. Arcilesi, Jr.2
Charlotte H. Lattin2
Charles G. Janney2
Edward A. Blackman2
Coordination by:
Office of Law Enforcement Standards
National Institute of Standards and Technology
Gaithersburg, MD 20899–8102
Prepared for:
Office of Science and Technology
Washington, DC 20531
November 2002
This document was prepared under CBIAC contract number SPO−900−94−D−0002

and Interagency Agreement M92361 between NIST and the Department of Defense
Technical Information Center (DTIC).
NCJ 191518
1
National Institute of Standards and Technology, Office of Law Enforcement Standards.
2
Battelle Memorial Institute.
Sarah V. Hart
Director
This guide was prepared for the National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice, by the Office of Law
Enforcement Standards of the National Institute of Standards and Technology under Interagency Agreement
94–IJ–R–004, Project No. 99–060–CBW. It was also prepared under CBIAC contract No. SPO–900–94–D–0002
and Interagency Agreement M92361 between NIST and the Department of Defense Technical Information Center
(DTIC).
The authors wish to thank Ms. Kathleen Higgins of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, Mr. Bill
Haskell of SBCCOM, Ms. Priscilla S. Golden of General Physics, LTC Don Buley of the Joint Program Office of
Biological Defense, Ms. Nicole Trudel of Camber Corporation, Dr. Stephen Morse of Centers for Disease Control,
and Mr. Todd Brethauer of the Technical Support Working Group for their significant contributions to this effort.
We would also like to acknowledge the Interagency Board for Equipment Standardization and Interoperability,
which consists of Government and first responder representatives.
FOREWORD
NIJ is the research, development, and evaluation agency of the U.S. Department of Justice and is
solely dedicated to researching crime control and justice issues. NIJ provides objective, independent,
nonpartisan, evidence-based knowledge and tools to meet the challenges of crime and justice,
particularly at the State and local levels.
The NIJ Director is appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate. The Director establishes
the Institute’s objectives and is guided by the priorities of the Office of Justice Programs, the U.S.
Department of Justice, and the needs of the field. The Institute actively solicits the views of criminal
justice and other professionals and researchers to inform its search for the knowledge and tools to
guide policy and practice.
In partnership with others, NIJ’s mission is to prevent and reduce crime, improve law enforcement
and the administration of justice, and promote public safety. By applying the disciplines of the social
and physical sciences, NIJ:
C Researches the nature and impact of crime and delinquency.

C Develops applied technologies, standards, and tools for criminal justice practitioners.
C Evaluates existing programs and responses to crime.
C Tests innovative concepts and program models in the field.
C Assists policymakers, program partners, and justice agencies.
C Disseminates knowledge to many audiences.
As part of its standard development activities, NIJ serves as the executive agent for the Interagency
Board for Equipment Standardization and Interoperability (IAB). The IAB has developed a set of
priorities for standards for equipment to be used by first responders to critical incidents, including
terrorist incidents relating to chemical, biological, nuclear, radiological, and explosive weapons. In
particular, the development of chemical and biological defense equipment guides for the emergency
first responder community is a high priority of NIJ.
The Office of Law Enforcement Standards (OLES) of the National Institute of Standards and
Technology (NIST) furnishes technical support to NIJ in the development of standards. OLES
subjects existing equipment to laboratory testing and evaluation and conducts research leading to the
development of national standards, user guides, and technical reports.
This document covers research conducted by OLES under the sponsorship of NIJ. Other NIJ
documents developed by OLES cover protective clothing and equipment, communications systems,
emergency equipment, investigative aids, security systems, vehicles, weapons, analytical techniques,
and standard reference materials used by the forensic community.
Technical comments and suggestions concerning this guide are invited from all interested parties.
They may be addressed to the Office of Law Enforcement Standards, National Institute of Standards
and Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8102, Gaithersburg, MD 20899–8102.
Sarah V. Hart, Director

iii
CONTENTS
FOREWORD.................................................................................................................................. iii
COMMONLY USED SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS .................................................... viii
ABOUT THIS GUIDE ................................................................................................................... xi
1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................1
2. PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT ..........................................................................3
2.1 The Purpose of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)....................................................3
2.2 Components of Personal Protective Ensembles..............................................................3
2.3 Levels of Protection.........................................................................................................6
3. INTRODUCTION TO CHEMICAL WARFARE AGENTS, TOXIC INDUSTRIAL
MATERIALS, AND BIOLOGICAL AGENTS .....................................................................9
3.1 Chemical Warfare Agents ...............................................................................................9
3.2 Toxic Industrial Materials (TIMs).................................................................................13
3.3 Biological Agents ..........................................................................................................17
4. OVERVIEW OF RESPIRATORY PROTECTION SYSTEMS..........................................25
4.1 Air-Purifying Respirators ..............................................................................................25
4.2 Atmosphere-Supplying Respirators...............................................................................29
4.3 Escape Masks ................................................................................................................31
5. PERCUTANEOUS PROTECTION.....................................................................................33
5.1 Types of Chemical Protective Clothing.........................................................................33
5.2 Material Chemical Resistance .......................................................................................35
5.3 Service Life ...................................................................................................................36
5.4 Percutaneous Protection Technologies..........................................................................36
6. PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT SELECTION FACTORS...............................39
6.1 Chemical Warfare (CW) Agents Protection… ..............................................................39
6.2 Biological Warfare (BW) Agents Protection................................................................39
6.3 Toxic Industrial Materials (TIMs) Protection...............................................................40
6.4 Duration of Protection...................................................................................................40
6.5 Environmental Conditions .............................................................................................40
6.6 Weight/Comfort.............................................................................................................40
6.7 Dexterity/Mobility (Ease of Use) ..................................................................................40
6.8 Sizes Available ..............................................................................................................40
6.9 Visibility........................................................................................................................40
6.10 Launderability (Cleaning)............................................................................................41
6.11 Training Requirements.................................................................................................41
6.12 Unit Cost......................................................................................................................41
7. EVALUATION OF RESPIRATORY PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT …............................45
7.1 Respiratory Protection...................................................................................................45
7.2 Evaluation Results .........................................................................................................46
8. EVALUATION OF PERCUTANEOUS PROTECTION (GARMENTS)… ......................59
8.1 Levels of Protection.......................................................................................................59
9. EVALUATION OF PERCUTANEOUS PROTECTION (APPAREL)…...........................83
9.1 Protective Apparel.........................................................................................................83
v
APPENDIX A––RECOMMENDED QUESTIONS ON PERSONAL PROTECTIVE
EQUIPMENT.....................................................................................................................A−1
APPENDIX B––REFERENCES ................................................................................................ B−1
APPENDIX C––IMMEDIATELY DANGEROUS TO LIFE AND HEALTH (IDLH)
VALUES ............................................................................................................................C−1
TABLES
Table 2−1. EPA levels of protection for ensemble components ...................................................7
Table 3–1. Physical and chemical properties of common nerve agents......................................10
Table 3–2. Physical and chemical properties of common blister agents.....................................12
Table 3–3. Physical and chemical properties of TIMs ................................................................14
Table 3–4. TIMs listed by hazard index......................................................................................16
Table 3−5. Bacterial agents .........................................................................................................19
Table 3−6. Viral agents................................................................................................................21
Table 3−7. Rickettsiae .................................................................................................................23
Table 3−8. Biological toxins........................................................................................................24
Table 5−1. Trade names, manufacturers, and descriptions of commonly used materials ...........38
Table 6−1. Selection factor key for personal protective equipment (respiratory) .......................42
Table 6−2. Selection factor key for percutaneous protective (garments) ....................................43
Table 6−3. Selection factor key for percutaneous protective (apparel).......................................44
Table 7−1. Respiratory protection equipment .............................................................................46
Table 7−2. Evaluation results reference table..............................................................................46
Table 7−3. Respiratory protection (masks)..................................................................................48
Table 7−4. Respiratory protection (PAPR)..................................................................................51
Table 7−5. Respiratory protection (SCBA) .................................................................................53
Table 7−6. Respiratory protection (SCBA/rebreather)................................................................54
Table 7−7. Respiratory protection (airline respirator) .................................................................55
Table 7−8. Respiratory protection (SCBA/airline respirator) .....................................................56
Table 7−9. Respiratory protection (escape masks)......................................................................57
Table 7−10. Selection factor key for personal protection equipment (respiratory) .......................58
Table 8−1. Percutaneous protective garments .............................................................................60
Table 8−3. Percutaneous protection (EPA Level A encapsulating) ............................................61
Table 8−4. Percutaneous protection (EPA Level A ensembles)..................................................66
Table 8−5. Percutaneous protection (EPA Level B encapsulating).............................................67
Table 8−6. Percutaneous protection (coveralls) ..........................................................................71
Table 8−7. Percutaneous protection (ensembles - other).............................................................80
Table 8−8. Percutaneous protection (overgarments) ...................................................................81
Table 8−9. Selection factor key for percutaneous protective (garments) ....................................82
Table 9−1. Percutaneous protective apparel................................................................................84
Table 9−3. Percutaneous protection (hoods) ...............................................................................86
Table 9−4. Percutaneous protection (foot protection) .................................................................88
vi
Table 9−5. Percutaneous protection (hand protection) ................................................................90
Table 9−6. Percutaneous protection (shirts, pants, jackets, and overalls)...................................92
Table 9−7. Percutaneous protection (aprons, labcoats, and ponchos).........................................94
Table 9−8. Percutaneous protection (undergarments) .................................................................95
Table 9−9. Percutaneous protection (casualty bags) ...................................................................96
Table 9−10. Percutaneous protection (personal cooling) ..............................................................97
Table 9−11. Selection factor key for percutaneous protective equipment (apparel) .....................98
FIGURES
Figure 2−1. ChemTape, Kappler Safety Group ..............................................................................4
Figure 2−2. Personal Ice Cooling System (PICS) GEOMET Technologies, Inc. ..........................4
Figure 2−3. Tychem® TK hood/vest, pullover, PVC face shield, DuPont Tyvek®
Protective Apparel.......................................................................................................5
Figure 2−4. Bata boot/shoe covers, Bata Shoe Co., Inc..................................................................5
Figure 2−5. Tingley Hazproof overboot, Tingley Rubber Corporation..........................................5
Figure 2−6. Chemical protective butyl rubber gloves, Guardian Manufacturing Co. ....................6
Figure 2−7. Lakeland Tychem® 9400 Level B Sleeves, Lakeland Industries, Inc. ........................6
Figure 4−1. Panorama Nova Full Facepiece, Draeger Safety, Inc................................................26
Figure 4−2. MSA Phalanx CBA/RCA Gas Mask, MSA..............................................................26
Figure 4−3. Survivair® Belt Mounted PAPR Survivair, A Division of Bacou USA
Safety, Inc..................................................................................................................26
Figure 4−4. Draeger AirBoss PSS100, Draeger Safety, Inc. ........................................................30
Figure 4−5. Biomarine BioPak 240 Rebreather, Biomarine, Inc...................................................30
Figure 4−6. ARAP/C and ARAP/E Airline Respirator, International Safety Instruments ...........30
Figure 4−7. Parat NBC Escape Hood, Draeger Safety, Inc. .........................................................31
Figure 4−8. Spiroscape Escape BA, Interspiro Inc. ......................................................................31
Figure 5−1. Tychem® BR EX Commander Level A Fully Encapsulating Suit,
DuPont Tyvek® Protective Apparel...........................................................................33
Figure 5−2. Tychem® TK EX Commander Brigade Level A Ensemble, NFPA 1991
certified, DuPont Tyvek® Protective Apparel..........................................................33
Figure 5−3. Tychem® SL Utility Level B Fully Encapsulating Suit, DuPont Tyvek®
Protective Apparel.....................................................................................................34
Figure 5−4. Kappler Responder® Level B Coverall with attached hood, Kappler
Safety Group..............................................................................................................34
Figure 5−5. Lakeland Tyvek ® QC Level B Coverall with collar, Lakeland Industries, Inc.........34
Figure 5−6. Saratoga Joint Service Lightweight Integrated Suit (JSLIST), Tex-Shield, Inc. ......35
vii
COMMONLY USED SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS
A ampere h hour oz ounce
ac alternating current hf high frequency o.d. outside diameter
AM amplitude modulation Hz hertz Ω ohm
cd candela i.d. inside diameter p. page
cm centimeter in inch Pa pascal
CP chemically pure IR infrared pe probable error
c/s cycle per second J joule pp. pages
d day L lambert ppm parts per million
dB decibel L liter qt quart
dc direct current lb pound rad radian
°C degree Celsius lbf pound-force rf radio frequency
°F degree Fahrenheit lbf in pound-force inch rh relative humidity
dia diameter lm lumen s second
emf electromotive force ln logarithm (base e) SD standard deviation
eq equation log logarithm (base 10) sec. Section
F farad M molar SWR standing wave ratio
fc footcandle m meter uhf ultrahigh frequency
fig. Figure µ micron UV ultraviolet
FM frequency modulation min minute V volt
ft foot mm millimeter vhf very high frequency
ft/s foot per second mph miles per hour W watt
g acceleration m/s meter per second N newton
g gram mo month λ wavelength
gal gallon Nm newton meter wk week
gr grain nm nanometer wt weight
H henry No. number yr year
area=unit 2 (e.g., ft 2, in2, etc.); volume=unit 3 (e.g., ft 3, m3, etc.)
ACRONYMS SPECIFIC TO THIS DOCUMENT
ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials NIJ National Institute of Justice
BW Biological Warfare NIOSH National Institute for Occupational Safety and
Health
CB Chemical and Biological NIST National Institute of Standards and Technology
CBW Chemical Biological Warfare NATO North Atlantic Treaty Organization
CPU Collective Protective Undergarment NBC Nuclear, Biological, and Chemical
CW Chemical Warfare OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration
DOD Department of Defense PAPR Powered Air Purifying Respirator
DTAPS Disposable Toxicological Agent Protective Suit PF Protection Factor
DPG Dugway Proving Grounds PICS Personal Ice Cooling System
DRES Defense Research Establishment Suffield POL Petroleum, Oils, and Lubricants
ECBE Edgewood Chemical Biological Center, PPE Personal Protective Equipment
Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD
EOD Explosive Ordnance Disposal PPV Positive Pressure Ventilation
EPA Environmental Protection Agency PVC Polyvinyl chloride
ERDEC U.S. Army Edgewood Research, Development SBCCOM U.S. Army Soldier and Biological Chemical
and Engineering Center Command
FBI Federal Bureau of Investigation SCBA Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus
FR Fire Resistant SCFM Standard Cubic Feet per Minute
HAZMAT Hazardous Materials STB Super Tropical Bleach
IDLH Immediately Dangerous to Life and Health TAP Toxicological Agent Protective
IAB Interagency Board TICs Toxic Industrial Chemicals
ITAR International Traffic and Arms Regulations TIMs Toxic Industrial Materials
NFPA National Fire Protection Association TOP Test Operating Procedure
viii
PREFIXES (See ASTM E380) COMMON CONVERSIONS
d deci (10-1 ) da deka (10) 0.30480 m =1ft 4.448222 N = lbf
c centi (10-2 ) h hecto (102 ) 25.4 mm = 1 in 1.355818 J =1 ft lbf
-3
m milli (10 ) k kilo (103 ) 0.4535924 kg = 1 lb 0.1129848 N m = lbf in
-6
µ micro (10 ) M mega (106 ) 0.06479891g = 1gr 14.59390 N/m =1 lbf/ft
n nano (10-9 ) G giga (109 ) 0.9463529 L = 1 qt 6894.757 Pa = 1 lbf/in2
-12
p pico (10 ) T tera (1012 ) 3600000 J = 1 kW hr 1.609344 km/h = mph
Temperature: T °C = (T °F –32)×5/9 Temperature: T °F = (T °C ×9/5)+32
ix
ABOUT THIS GUIDE
The National Institute of Justice is the focal point for providing support to State and local law
enforcement agencies in the development of counterterrorism technology and standards,
including technology needs for chemical and biological defense. In recognizing the needs of
State and local emergency first responders, the Office of Law Enforcement Standards (OLES) at
the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), supported by the National Institute
of Justice (NIJ), the Technical Support Working Group (TSWG), the U.S. Army Soldier and
Biological Chemical Command, and the Interagency Board for Equipment Standardization and
Interoperability (IAB), is developing chemical and biological defense equipment guides. The
guides will focus on chemical and biological equipment in areas of detection, personal
protection, decontamination, and communication. This document focuses specifically on
assisting the emergency first responder community in the evaluation and purchase of personal
protective equipment.
The long range plans include these goals: (1) subject existing personal protective equipment to
laboratory testing and evaluation against a specified protocol, and (2) conduct research leading to
the development of a series of documents, including national standards, user guides, and
technical reports. It is anticipated that the testing, evaluation, and research processes will take
several years to complete; therefore, the National Institute of Justice has developed this initial
guide for the emergency first responder community in order to facilitate their evaluation and
purchase of personal protective equipment.
In conjunction with this program, additional guides, as well as other documents, are being issued
in the areas of chemical agent and toxic industrial material detection equipment, biological agent
detection equipment, decontamination equipment, and communication equipment.
The information contained in this guide has been obtained through literature searches and market
surveys. The vendors were contacted multiple times during the preparation of this guide to
ensure data accuracy. In addition, the information is supplemented with test data obtained from
other sources (e.g., Department of Defense), if available. It should also be noted that the purpose
of this guide is not to provide recommendations but rather to serve as a means to provide
information to the reader to compare and contrast commercially available personal protective
equipment. Reference herein to any specific commercial products, processes, or services by
trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its
endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government. The information
and statements contained in this guide shall not be used for the purposes of advertising, nor to
imply the endorsement or recommendation of the United States Government.
With respect to information provided in this guide, neither the United States Government nor any
of its employees make any warranty, expressed or implied, including but not limited to the
warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. Further, neither the United
States Government nor any of its employees assume any legal liability or responsibility for the
accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process
disclosed.
xi
Technical comments, suggestions, and product updates are encouraged from interested parties.
They may be addressed to the Office of Law Enforcement Standards, National Institute of
Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8102, Gaithersburg, MD 20899−8102. It is
anticipated that this guide will be updated periodically.
Questions relating to the specific personal protective items, respiratory and percutaneous (skin)
protection, included in this document should be addressed directly to the proponent agencies or
the equipment manufacturers. Contact information for each equipment item included in this
guide can be found in Volume IIa (respiratory protection), Volume IIb (percutaneous protection–
–garments), and Volume IIc (percutaneous––other apparel).
xii
GUIDE FOR THE SELECTION OF PERSONAL PROTECTIVE
EQUIPMENT FOR EMERGENCY FIRST RESPONDERS
This guide includes information that is intended to assist the emergency first responder
community in the evaluation and purchase of personal protective equipment (PPE). It includes a
thorough market survey of personal protection technologies and commercially available
equipment known to the authors as of April 2001. Brief technical discussions are presented that
consider the principles of protection of several items. Readers finding this material too technical
can omit this information while still making use of the rest of the guide, and readers desiring
more technical detail can obtain it from the references listed in appendix B.
1. INTRODUCTION
The primary purpose of the Guide for the Selection of Personal Protective Equipment for
Emergency First Responders is to provide emergency first responders with information to aid
them in the selection of PPE, both respiratory protection and percutaneous (skin) protection. The
guide is intended to be more practical than technical and provides information on a variety of
factors that should be considered when purchasing and using PPE, including duration of
protection, dexterity/mobility (how cumbersome is the equipment), launderability, and use/reuse,
to name a few.
Due to the large number of PPE items identified, the guide is separated into four volumes.
Volume I represents the actual guide, Volume IIa, Volume IIb, and Volume IIc serve as
supplements to Volume I since they contain the PPE data sheets only. Volume IIa contains the
data sheets for respiratory protection, Volume IIb contains the data sheets for protective
garments, and Volume IIc contains the data sheets for other protective apparel (boots, gloves,
hoods, and lab coats, etc.).
The remainder of this guide (Vol. I) is divided into several sections. Section 2 presents
background information about the function of PPE, the components of personal protective
ensembles, and the levels of protection. Section 3 provides an introduction to chemical agents,
TIMs, and biological agents. Specifically, it discusses CB agents by providing overviews,
physical and chemical properties, routes of entry, and symptoms. It also discusses the 98 TIMs
that are considered in this guide. Section 4 presents an overview of respiratory protection
equipment. Section 5 presents an overview of percutaneous protection equipment. Section 6
discusses the 12 characteristics and performance parameters that are used to evaluate PPE in this
guide (referred to as selection factors in the remainder of this guide). These selection factors
were compiled by a panel of experienced scientists and engineers with multiple years of
experience with PPE, domestic preparedness, and identification of emergency first responder
needs. The factors have also been shared with the emergency responder community in order to
get their thoughts and comments. Section 7 presents comparative evaluation of available
respiratory protection equipment. Section 8 presents comparative evaluation of available
percutaneous protective equipment (garments). Section 9 presents a comparative evaluation of
other available percutaneous protective equipment (apparel).
1
Three appendices are also included within this guide. Appendix A lists questions that could assist
emergency first responders when selecting PPE. Appendix B lists the documents that were
referenced in this guide. Appendix C provides the immediately dangerous to life and health
(IDLH) values for the chemical agents and most of the TIMs that are listed.
2
2. PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT
The intent of this section is to provide background information about the function of PPE, the
components of personal protective ensembles, and the levels of protection provided by PPE.
2.1 The Purpose of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)
The purpose of personal protective clothing and equipment is to shield or isolate individuals
from the chemical, physical, and biological hazards that may be encountered during hazardous
materials operations. During an emergency response, it is not always apparent when exposure
occurs. Many toxic materials pose invisible hazards and offer no warning properties.
PPE must be worn whenever the wearer faces potential hazards arising from toxic exposure.
Many activities associated with emergency operations that may require the wearing of PPE are
presented below:
• Site Survey: Individuals conducting an initial investigation of a hazardous materials

incident/accident site. These situations are usually characterized by a large degree of
uncertainty and mandate the highest levels of protection.
• Emergency Rescue: Individuals entering a hazardous materials area for the purpose of
removing an exposure victim. Special considerations must be given to how the selected
protective clothing may affect the ability of the wearer to carry out rescue operations.
• Hazard Mitigation: Individuals entering a hazardous materials area to prevent a potential

toxic release or to reduce the hazards from an existing release. Protective clothing must
accommodate the required tasks without sacrificing adequate protection.
• Monitoring/Supervision: Individuals entering a hazardous materials area for the explicit

purpose of observing and directing work operations or preventing unnecessary safety risks.
• Decontamination: Individuals providing decontamination support to personnel or equipment

leaving the contaminated site.
It is important that responders realize that no single combination of protective equipment and
clothing is capable of protecting against all hazards. Thus, PPE should always be used in
conjunction with other protective methods. For example, proper decontamination and
engineering or administrative controls should always be employed as additional measures for
preventing exposure.
2.2 Components of Personal Protective Ensembles
The approach in selecting PPE must encompass an “ensemble” of clothing and equipment items,
which are easily integrated to provide an appropriate level of protection while still allowing one
to carry out activities involving hazardous materials. Components forming an effective protective
3
ensemble may incorporate a wide variety of protective equipment and clothing items. For the
purpose of this guide, the evaluated items have been organized into the following three groups:
• Respiratory Equipment (e.g., air purifying respirators and supplied air respirators).
• Protective Garments (e.g., encapsulated suits, coveralls, and overgarments).
• Other Protective Apparel (e.g., protective hoods, boots, and gloves).
Two examples of items that are not specifically percutaneous apparel, but are included in this
discussion, are tape and personal cooling systems. Figure 2−1 shows an example of ChemTape,
from Kappler Safety Group. ChemTape is used to secure the wrist and ankle cuffs in all levels of
protection except Level A. Figure 2−2 shows the Personal Ice Cooling System (PICS) from
GEOMET Technologies, Inc. Although a PIC is not a percutaneous item, it does protect the user
from heat stress when worn with protective garments.
Figure 2−1. ChemTape, Kappler Safety Group Figure 2−2. Personal Ice Cooling System (PICS)
GEOMET Technologies, Inc.
The following figures are included to familiarize the reader with the types of protective apparel
that are included in protective ensembles. Figure 2−3 is an example of a protective hood, the
Tychem® TK hood/vest, pullover, PVC face shield, from DuPont Tyvek ® Protective Apparel.
4
Figure 2−3. Tychem® TK hood/vest, pullover, PVC
face shield, DuPont Tyvek ® Protective Apparel
Figure 2−4 and figure 2−5 are two examples of foot protection, the Bata boot/shoe covers from
Bata Shoe Co., Inc. and the Tingley Hazproof Overboot from Tingley Rubber Corporation.
2−4. Bata boot/shoe covers, Figure 2−5. Tingley Hazproof overboot,

Bata Shoe Co., Inc. Tingley Rubber Corporation
Figure 2−6 and figure 2−7 offer two examples of hand and arm protection. They are the chemical
protective butyl rubber gloves from Guardian Manufacturing Company, and the Lakeland
Tychem® 9400 Level B Sleeves from Lakeland Industries, Inc.
5
Figure 2−6. Chemical protective butyl rubber Figure 2−7. Lakeland Tychem® 9400 Level B
gloves, Guardian Manufacturing Co. Sleeves, Lakeland Industries, Inc.
2.3 Levels of Protection
It is important for responders to realize that selecting items based only on how they are designed or
configured is not sufficient to ensure adequate protection. In other words, just having the right
components to form an ensemble is not enough. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) levels
of protection do not define what performance the selected clothing or equipment must offer. Many of
these considerations are described in the “limiting criteria” column of table 2−1. Additional factors
relevant to the various clothing and equipment items are described in subsequent sections.
Table 2−1 lists ensemble components based on the widely used EPA Levels of Protection (i.e.,
Levels A, B, C, and D). These lists can be used as the starting point for ensemble creation; however,
each ensemble must be tailored to the specific situation in order to provide the most appropriate level
of protection.
In addition to the EPA Levels of Protection, the National Fire Protection Agency (NFPA) has
classified suits by their performance.
NFPA Standard 1991—Vapor-protective suits that provide “gas-tight” integrity and are intended for
response situations where no chemical contact is permissible. This type of suit would be equivalent
to EPA Level A protection.
NFPA Standard 1992—Liquid splash-protective suits offer protection against liquid chemicals in the
form of splashes, but not against continuous liquid contact or chemical vapors or gases. This type of
clothing would meet the EPA Level B needs.
NFPA Standard 1993—Support function protective garments that provide liquid splash protection
but offer limited physical protection. They are intended for use in non-emergency, nonflammable
situations where the chemical hazards have been completely characterized. Support function
protective garments should not be used in chemical emergency response or in situations where
chemical hazards remain uncharacterized.
6
Table 2−1. EPA levels of protection for ensemble components
Level A Vapor protective suit (meets NFPA 1991)

Pressure-demand, full-face SCBA, inner chemical-resistant gloves, and chemical-resistant
safety boots.
OPTIONAL: Cooling system, outer gloves, hard hat, and two-way radio communications
system.
Protection Provided: Highest available level of respiratory, skin, and eye protection from
solid, liquid, and gaseous chemicals.
Used When: The chemical(s) have been identified and pose high levels of hazards to
respiratory system, skin, and eyes. Substances are present with known or suspected skin
toxicity or carcinogenity. Operations must be conducted in confined or poorly ventilated
areas.
Limitations : Protective clothing must resist permeation by the chemical or mixtures present.
Ensemble items must allow integration without loss of performance.
Level B Liquid splash protective suit (meets NFPA 1992). Pressure demand, full facepiece SCBA,
inner chemical-resistant gloves, chemical-resistant safety boots, and hard hat.
OPTIONAL: Cooling system, outer gloves, and two-way radio communications system.
Protection Provided: Provides same level of respiratory protection as Level A, but less skin
protection. Liquid splash protection, but no protection against chemical vapors or gases.
Used When: The chemical(s) have been identified but do not require a high level of skin
protection. Initial site surveys are required until higher levels of hazards are identified. The
primary hazards associated with site entry are from liquid and not vapor contact.
Limitations : Protective clothing items must resist penetration by the chemicals or mixtures
present. Ensemble items must allow integration without loss of performance.
Level C Not Acceptable for Chemical Emergency Response
Support Function Protective Garment (meets NFPA 1993). Full facepiece, air purifying,
canister-equipped respirator, chemical-resistant gloves and safety boots, two-way radio
communications system, and hard hat.
OPTIONAL: Face shield, and escape SCBA.
Protection Provided: Provides the same level of skin protection as Level B, but a lower level
of respiratory protection. Liquid splash protection, but no protection against chemical vapors
or gases.
Used When: Contact with site chemical(s) will not affect the skin. Air contaminants have
been identified and concentrations measured. A respirator canister is available that can
remove the contaminant. The site and its hazards have been completely characterized.
Limitations : Protective clothing items must resist penetration by the chemical or mixtures
present. Chemical airborne concentration must be less than IDLH levels. The atmosphere
must contain at least 19.5 % oxygen.
Level D Not Acceptable for Chemical Emergency Response
Coveralls, safety boots/shoes, safety glasses or chemical splash goggles.
OPTIONAL: Gloves, escape SCBA, and face shield.
Protection Provided: No respiratory protection, and minimal skin protection.
Used When: The atmosphere contains no known hazards. Work functions preclude splashes,
immersion, potential for inhalation, or direct contact with hazard chemicals.
Limitations : This level should not be worn in the Hot Zone. The atmosphere must contain at
least 19.5 % oxygen.
7
3. INTRODUCTION TO CHEMICAL WARFARE AGENTS, TOXIC
INDUSTRIAL MATERIALS, AND BIOLOGICAL AGENTS
The purpose of this section is to provide a description of chemical warfare agents (CWA), toxic
industrial materials (TIMs), and biological agents (BA).
3.1 Chemical Warfare Agents
Chemical warfare agents are chemical substances that are intended for use in warfare or terrorist
activities to kill, seriously injure, or seriously incapacitate people through their physiological
effects. A chemical agent attacks the organs of the human body, preventing the organs from
functioning normally. The results are usually disabling or fatal. The volatility of a chemical agent
often determines how it is used. Volatility refers to a substance’s ability to become a vapor at a
relatively low temperature. A highly volatile (nonpersistent) substance poses a greater respiratory
hazard than a less volatile (persistent) substance.
The most common chemical warfare agents are the nerve agents, GA (Tabun), GB (Sarin), GD
(Soman), GF, and VX; and the blister agents, HD (sulfur mustard) and HN (nitrogen mustard)
and the arsenical vesicants, L (Lewisite). Other toxic chemicals such as hydrogen cyanide
(characterized as a chemical blood agent by the military) are included as TIMs under section 3.2
of this guide. There are also toxic chemicals derived from living organisms, generically termed
toxins . Toxins are included under section 3.3 of this guide.
3.1.1 Nerve Agents
This section provides an overview of nerve agents. A discussion of their physical and chemical
properties, their routes of entry, and descriptions of symptoms is also provided.
3.1.1.1 Overview
Among lethal chemical agents, nerve agents have had an entirely dominant role since World War
II. Nerve agents acquired their name because they affect the transmission of impulses in the
nervous system. All nerve agents belong to the chemical group of organo-phosphorus
compounds; many common herbicides and pesticides also belong to this chemical group. Nerve
agents are stable, easily dispersed, highly toxic, and have rapid effects when absorbed both
through the skin and the respiratory system. Nerve agents can be manufactured by means of
fairly simple chemical techniques. The raw materials are inexpensive but some are subject to the
controls of the Chemical Weapons Convention and the Australia Group Agreement.
3.1.1.2 Physical and Chemical Properties
The nerve agents considered in this guide are:
• GA: A low volatility persistent chemical agent that is taken up through skin contact and
inhalation of the substance as a gas or aerosol.
• GB: A volatile nonpersistent chemical agent mainly taken up through inhalation.
9
• GD: A moderately volatile chemical agent that can be taken up by inhalation or skin contact.
• GF: A low volatility persistent chemical agent that is taken up through skin contact and
inhalation of the substance either as a gas or aerosol.
• VX: A low volatility persistent chemical agent that can remain on material, equipment, and
terrain for long periods. Uptake is mainly through the skin but also through inhalation of the
substance as a gas or aerosol.
Nerve agents in the pure state are colorless liquids. Their volatility varies widely. The consistency
of VX may be likened to motor oil and is therefore classified as belonging to the group of
persistent chemical agents. Its effect is mainly through direct contact with the skin. GB is at the
opposite extreme; being an easily volatile liquid (comparable with, e.g., water), it is mainly taken
up through the respiratory organs. The volatilities of GD, GA, and GF are between those of GB
and VX. Table 3−1 lists the common nerve agents and some of their physical and chemical
properties. Water is included in the table as a reference point for the nerve agents.
Table 3–1. Physical and chemical properties of common nerve agents
Property GA GB GD GF VX Water
Molecular 162.3 140.1 182.2 180.2 267.4 18

Weight
Density, g/cm3 * 1.073 1.089 1.022 1.120 1.008 1
Boiling-point, o F 464 316 388 462 568 212
Melting-point, o F 18 -69 -44 -22 < -60 32
Vapor pressure, 0.07 2.9 0.4 0.06 0.0007 23.756
Mm Hg *
Volatility, mg/m3 * 610 22000 3900 600 10.5 23010
Solubility in 10 Miscible with 2 ~2 Slightly NA
Water, % * water
*at 77 οF
3.1.1.3 Route of Entry
Nerve agents, either as a gas, aerosol, or liquid, enter the body through inhalation or through the
skin. Poisoning may also occur through consumption of liquids or foods contaminated with nerve
agents.
The route of entry also influences the symptoms developed and, to some extent, the sequence of
the different symptoms. Generally, the poisoning works most rapidly when the agent is absorbed
through the respiratory system rather than other routes because the lungs contain numerous blood
vessels and the inhaled nerve agent can quickly diffuse into the blood circulation and thus reach
the target organs. Among these organs, the respiratory system is one of the most important. If a
person is exposed to a high concentration of nerve agent, e.g., 200 mg sarin/m3 , death may occur
within a couple of minutes.
The poisoning works slower when the agent is absorbed through the skin. Since nerve agents are
somewhat fat-soluble, they can easily penetrate the outer layers of the skin, but it takes longer for
10
the poison to reach the deeper blood vessels. Consequently, the first symptoms do not occur until
20 min to 30 min after the initial exposure but subsequently, the poisoning process may be rapid
if the total dose of nerve agent is high.
3.1.1.4 Symptoms
When exposed to a low dose of nerve agent, sufficient to cause minor poisoning, the victim
experiences characteristic symptoms such as increased production of saliva, a runny nose, and a
feeling of pressure on the chest. The pupil of the eye becomes contracted (miosis), which impairs
night-vision. In addition, the capacity of the eye to change focal length is reduced, and short-
range vision deteriorates causing the victim to feel pain when trying to focus on nearby objects.
This is accompanied by a headache. Less specific symptoms are tiredness, slurred speech,
hallucinations, and nausea.
Exposure to a higher dose leads to more dramatic developments, and symptoms are more
pronounced. Bronchoconstriction and secretion of mucus in the respiratory system leads to
difficulty in breathing and to coughing. Discomfort in the gastrointestinal tract may develop into
cramping and vomiting, and there may be involuntary discharge of urine and feces. There may
be excessive salivating, tearing, and sweating. If the poisoning is moderate, typical symptoms
affecting the skeletal muscles may be muscular weakness, local tremors, or convulsions.
When exposed to a high dose of nerve agent, the muscular symptoms are more pronounced and
the victim may suffer convulsions and lose consciousness. The poisoning process may be so
rapid that symptoms mentioned earlier may never have time to develop.
Nerve agents affect the respiratory muscles causing muscular paralysis. Nerve agents also affect
the respiratory center of the central nervous system. The combination of these two effects is the
direct cause of death. Consequently, death caused by nerve agents is similar to death by
suffocation.
3.1.2 Blister Agents (Vesicants)
This section provides an overview of blister agents. A discussion of their physical and chemical
properties, their routes of entry, and descriptions of symptoms is also provided.
3.1.2.1 Overview
There are two major families of blister agents (vesicants): sulfur mustard (HD) and nitrogen
mustard (HN), and the arsenical vesicants (L). All blister agents are persistent and may be
employed in the form of colorless gases and liquids. They burn and blister the skin or any other
part of the body they contact. Blister agents are likely to be used to produce casualties rather than
to kill, although exposure to such agents can be fatal.
3.1.2.2 Physical and Chemical Properties
In its pure state, mustard agent is colorless and almost odorless. It earned its name as a result of
an early production method that resulted in an impure product with a mustard-like odor. Mustard
11
agent is also claimed to have a characteristic odor similar to rotten onions. However, the sense of
smell is dulled after only a few breaths so that the smell can no longer be distinguished. In
addition, mustard agent can cause injury to the respiratory system in concentrations that are so
low that the human sense of smell cannot distinguish them.
At room temperature, mustard agent is a liquid with low volatility and is very stable during
storage. Mustard agent can easily be dissolved in most organic solvents but has negligible
solubility in water. In aqueous solutions, mustard agent decomposes into nonpoisonous products
by means of hydrolysis but since only dissolved mustard agent reacts, the decomposition
proceeds very slowly. Oxidants such as chloramines, however, react violently with mustard
agent, forming nonpoisonous oxidation products. Consequently, these substances are used for the
decontamination of mustard agent.
Arsenical vesicants are not as common or as stable as the sulfur or nitrogen mustards. All
arsenical vesicants are colorless to brown liquids. They are more volatile than mustard and have
fruity to geranium-like odors. These types of vesicants are much more dangerous as liquids than
as vapors. Absorption of either vapor or liquid through the skin in adequate dosage may lead to
systemic intoxication or death. The physical and chemical properties of the most common blister
agents are listed in table 3–2. Water is included in the table as a reference point for the blister
agents.
Table 3–2. Physical and chemical properties of common blister agents
Property HD HN-1 HN-2 HN-3 L Water
Molecular 159.1 170.1 156.1 204.5 207.4 18

Weight
Density, g/cm3 1.27 at 1.09 1.15 1.24 1.89 1
68 °F at 77 °F at 68 °F at 77 °F at 68 °F at 77 °F
Boiling-point, o F 421 381 167 at 15 493 374 212
mm Hg
Freezing-point, o F 58 -61.2 -85 -26.7 64.4 to 32
32.18
Vapor pressure, 0.072 0.24 0.29 0.0109 0.394 23.756
Mm Hg at 68 °F at 77 °F at 68 °F at 77 °F at 68 °F at 77 °F
Volatility, mg/m3 610 1520 3580 121 4480 23010
at 68 °F at 68 °F at 77 °F at 77 °F at 68 °F at 77 °F
Solubility in <1 % Sparingly Sparingly Insoluble Insoluble NA
Water, %
3.1.2.3 Route of Entry
Most blister agents are relatively persistent and are readily absorbed by all parts of the body.
Poisoning may also occur through consumption of liquids or foods contaminated with blister
agents. These agents cause inflammation, blisters, and general destruction of tissues. In the form
of gas or liquid, mustard agent attacks the skin, eyes, lungs, and gastrointestinal tract. Internal
12
organs, mainly blood-generating organs (i.e., bone marrow, spleen, and lymphatic tissue), may
also be injured as a result of mustard agents being taken up through the skin or lungs and
transported into the body. Since mustard agents give no immediate symptoms upon contact, a
delay of between 2 h and 24 h may occur before pain is felt and the victim becomes aware of
what has happened. By then, cell damage has already occurred. The delayed effect is a
characteristic of mustard agent.
3.1.2.4 Symptoms
In general, vesicants can penetrate the skin by contact with either liquid or vapor. The latent
period for the effects from mustard is usually several hours (the onset of symptoms from vapors
is 4 h to 6 h and the onset of symptoms from skin exposure is 2 h to 48 h). There is no latent
period for exposure to Lewisite.
Mild symptoms of mustard agent poisoning may include aching eyes with excessive tearing,
inflammation of the skin, irritation of the mucous membranes, hoarseness, coughing, and
sneezing. Normally, these injuries do not require medical treatment.
Severe injuries that are incapacitating and require medical care may involve eye injuries with
loss of sight, the formation of blisters on the skin, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea together with
severe difficulty in breathing. Severe damage to the eye may lead to the total loss of vision.
The most pronounced effects on inner organs are injury to the bone marrow, spleen, and
lymphatic tissue. This may cause a drastic reduction in the number of white blood cells 5 d to
10 d after exposure; a condition very similar to that after exposure to radiation. This reduction of
the immune defense will complicate the already large risk of infection in people with severe skin
and lung injuries.
The most common cause of death as a result of mustard agent poisoning is complications after
lung injury caused by inhalation of mustard agent. Most of the chronic and late effects from
mustard agent poisoning are also caused by lung injuries.
3.2 Toxic Industrial Materials (TIMs)
This section provides a general overview of TIMs as well as a list of the specific TIMs
considered in this guide. Since the chemistry of TIMs is so varied, it is not feasible to discuss
specific routes of entry and descriptions of symptoms. Several documents, including 2000
Emergency Response Guidebook (A Guidebook for First Responders During the Initial Phase of
a Dangerous Goods/Hazardous Materials Incident), provide more detailed information about
TIMs (see app. B).
TIMs are chemicals other than chemical warfare agents that have harmful effects on humans.
TIMs, often referred to as toxic industrial chemicals, or TICs, are used in a variety of settings
such as manufacturing facilities, maintenance areas, and general storage areas. While exposure to
some of these chemicals may not be immediately dangerous to life and health (IDLH), these
compounds may have extremely serious effects on an individual’s health after multiple low-level
exposures.
13
3.2.1 General
A TIM is a specific type of industrial chemical, i.e., one that has a LCt50 value (lethal
concentration of a chemical vapor or aerosol for 50 % of the population multiplied by exposure
time) less than 100000 mg-min/m3 in any mammalian species and is produced in quantities
exceeding 30 tons per year at one production facility. Although they are not as lethal as the
highly toxic nerve agents, their ability to make a significant impact on the populace is assumed
to be more related to the amount of chemical a terrorist can employ on the target(s) and less
related to their lethality. None of these compounds are as highly toxic as the nerve agents, but
they are produced in very large quantities (multi-ton) and are readily available; therefore, they
pose a far greater threat than chemical warfare agents. For instance, sulfuric acid is not as lethal
as the nerve agents, but it is easier to disseminate large quantities of sulfuric acid because large
amounts of it are manufactured and transported everyday. It is assumed that a balance is struck
between the lethality of a material and the amount of materials produced worldwide. Materials
such as the nerve agents are so lethal as to be in a special class of chemicals.
Since TIMs are less lethal than the highly toxic nerve agents, it is more difficult to determine
how to rank their potential for use by a terrorist. Physical and chemical properties for TIMs such
as ammonia, chlorine, cyanogen chloride, and hydrogen cyanide are presented in table 3–3.
Water is included in the table as a reference point for the TIMs. The physical and chemical
properties for the remaining TIMs identified in this guide can be found in International Task
Force 25: Hazard From Industrial Chemicals Final Report, April 1998 (see app. B).
Table 3–3. Physical and chemical properties of TIMs
Property Ammonia Chlorine Cyanogen Hydrogen Water

Chloride Cyanide
Molecular weight 17.03 70.9 61.48 27.02 18
Density, g/cm3 0.00077 3.214 1.18 0.990 1
at 77 °F at 77 °F at 68 °F at 68 °F at 77 °F
Boiling-point, o F -28 -30 55 78 212
Freezing-point, o F -108 -150 20 8 32
Vapor pressure, 7408 5643 1000 742 23.756
Mm Hg at 77 °F
Volatility, mg/m3 6782064 at 21508124 at 2600000 1080000 at 23010
77 °F 77 °F at 68 °F 77 °F at 77 °F
Solubility in 89.9 1.5 Slightly Highly NA
water, % soluble
3.2.2 TIM Rankings
TIMs are ranked into one of three categories that indicate their relative importance and assist in
hazard assessment. Table 3–4 lists the TIMs with respect to their hazard index ranking (high,
medium, or low hazard). 3
3
Summary of the Final Report of the International Task Force 25 Hazard from Industrial Chemicals, 15 April 1999.
14
3.2.2.1 High Hazard
High hazard indicates a widely produced, stored or transported TIM, that has high toxicity and is
easily vaporized.
3.2.2.2 Medium Hazard
Medium hazard indicates a TIM, which may rank high in some categories but lower in others
such as number of producers, physical state, or toxicity.
3.2.2.3 Low Hazard
A low hazard overall ranking indicates that this TIM is not likely to be a hazard unless specific
operational factors indicate otherwise.
15
Table 3–4. TIMs listed by hazard index
High Medium Low

Ammonia Acetone cyanohydrin Allyl isothiocyanate
Arsine Acrolein Arsenic trichloride
Boron trichloride Acrylonitrile Bromine
Boron trifluoride Allyl alcohol Bromine chloride
Carbon disulfide Allylamine Bromine pentafluoride
Chlorine Allyl chlorocarbonate Bromine trifluoride
Diborane Boron tribromide Carbonyl fluoride
Ethylene oxide Carbon monoxide Chlorine pentafluoride
Fluorine Carbonyl sulfide Chlorine trifluoride
Formaldehyde Chloroacetone Chloroacetaldehyde
Hydrogen bromide Chloroacetonitrile Chloroacetyl chloride
Hydrogen chloride Chlorosulfonic acid Crotonaldehyde
Hydrogen cyanide Diketene Cyanogen chloride
Hydrogen fluoride 1,2-Dimethylhydrazine Dimethyl sulfate
Hydrogen sulfide Ethylene dibromide Diphenylmethane-4,4'-diisocyanate
Nitric acid, fuming Hydrogen selenide Ethyl chloroformate
Phosgene Methanesulfonyl chloride Ethyl chlorothioformate
Phosphorus trichloride Methyl bromide Ethyl phosphonothioic dichloride
Sulfur dioxide Methyl chloroformate Ethyl phosphonic dichloride
Sulfuric acid Methyl chlorosilane Ethyleneimine
Tungsten hexafluoride Methyl hydrazine Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
Methyl isocyanate Hydrogen iodide
Methyl mercaptan Iron pentacarbonyl
Nitrogen dioxide Isobutyl chloroformate
Phosphine Isopropyl chloroformate
Phosphorus oxychloride Isopropyl isocyanate
Phosphorus pentafluoride n-Butyl chloroformate
Selenium hexafluoride n-Butyl isocyanate
Silicon tetrafluoride Nitric oxide
Stibine n-Propyl chloroformate
Sulfur trioxide Parathion
Sulfuryl chloride Perchloromethyl mercaptan
Sulfuryl fluoride sec-Butyl chloroformate
Tellurium hexafluoride tert-Butyl isocyanate
n-Octyl mercaptan Tetraethyl lead
Titanium tetrachloride Tetraethyl pyroposphate
Trichloroacetyl chloride Tetramethyl lead
Trifluoroacetyl chloride Toluene 2,4-diisocyanate
Toluene 2,6-diisocyanate
16
3.3 Biological Agents
The purpose of this section is to provide a description of the biological agents likely to be used in a
terrorist attack. There are four categories under discussion: bacterial agents, viral agents, rickettsiae,
and biological toxins.
3.3.1 Bacterial Agents
Bacteria are small, single-celled organisms, most of which can be grown on solid or liquid culture
media. Under special circumstances, some types of bacteria can transform into spores that are more
resistant to cold, heat, drying, chemicals, and radiation than the bacterium itself. Most bacteria do not
cause disease in human beings but those that do cause disease by two differing mechanisms: by
invading the tissues or by producing poisons (toxins). Many bacteria, such as anthrax, have
properties that make them attractive as potential warfare agents:
• Retained potency during growth and processing to the end product (biological weapon).
• Long “shelf-life.”
• Low biological decay as an aerosol.
Other bacteria require stabilizers to improve their potential for use as biological weapons. Table 3−5
lists some of the common bacterial agents along with possible methods of dissemination, incubation
period, symptoms, and treatment.
3.3.2 Viral Agents
Viruses are the simplest type of microorganism and consist of a nucleocapsid protein coat containing
genetic material, either RNA or DNA. Because viruses lack a system for their own metabolism, they
require living hosts (cells of an infected organism) for replication. As biological agents, they are
attractive because many do not respond to antibiotics. However, their incubation periods are
normally longer than for other biological agents, so incapacitation of victims may be delayed. Table
3−6 lists the common viral agents along with possible methods of dissemination, incubation period,
symptoms, and treatment.
3.3.3 Rickettsiae
Rickettsiae are obligate intracellular bacteria that are intermediate in size between most bacteria and
viruses and possess certain characteristics common to both bacteria and viruses. Like bacteria, they
have metabolic enzymes and cell membranes, use oxygen, and are susceptible to broad-spectrum
antibiotics, but like viruses, they grow only in living cells. Most rickettsiae can be spread only
through the bite of infected insects and are not spread through human contact. Table 3−7 lists the
common rickettsiae along with possible methods of dissemination, incubation periods, symptoms,
and treatment.
17
3.3.4 Biological Toxins
Biological toxins are poisons produced by living organisms. It is the poison and not the organism that
produces harmful effects in man. A toxin typically develops naturally in a host organism (for example,
saxitoxin is produced by marine algae); however, genetically altered and/or synthetically manufactured
toxins have been produced in a laboratory environment. Biological toxins are most similar to chemical
agents in their dissemination and effectiveness. Table 3−8 lists the common biological toxins along
with possible methods of dissemination, incubation period, symptoms, and treatment.
18
Table 3−5. Bacterial agents
Biological E. coli serotype

Agent/Disease Anthrax Brucellosis (O157:H7) Tularemia Cholera
Likely Method 1. Spores in aerosol 1. Aerosol Water and food supply 1. Aerosol 1. Sabotage
of Dissemi- 2. Sabotage (food) 2. Sabotage (food) contamination 2. Rabbits or ticks (food and
nation water)
2. Aerosol
Transmissible No (except cutaneous) Unknown Unknown, evidence No Rare
Person to passed person-to-
Person person in day-care or
nursing homes
Incubation 1 d to 43 d 1 wk to 3 wk, Unknown 2 d to 10 d 3 d to 5 d
Period sometimes months
Duration of 3 d to 5 d (usually Unknown 5 d to 10 d (most >2 wk >1 wk
Illness fatal) cases)
Lethality Contact or cutaneous Low Fatality rate is 0 % to Moderate if left Low (<1 %)
anthrax: fatality rate of 15 % if victim untreated with treatment;
5 % to 20 % develops hemolytic high (>50 %)
Inhalational anthrax: uremic syndrome without
after symptoms appear (HUS); 5 % if victim
almost always fatal, develops thrombotic
regardless of treatment thrombocytopenic
purpura (TTP)
Vaccine Currently no human Vaccine under No vaccine No commercially No data on
Efficacy data evaluation available vaccine aerosol
(for aerosol
exposure)/
Antitoxin
Symptoms and Flu-like, upper- Irregular Gastrointestinal Chills, sustained Sudden onset
Effects respiratory distress; prolonged fever, (diarrhea, vomiting) fever, prostration, with nausea,
fever and shock in 3 d profuse sweating, dehydration; in severe tendency for vomiting,
to 5 d, followed by chills, joint and cases, cardiac arrest pneumonia, diarrhea, rapid
death muscle pain, and death, HUS, or enlarged, painful dehydration,
persistent fatigue TTP lymph nodes, toxemia and
headache, malaise, collapse
anorexia, non-
productive cough
Treatment Vaccine available for Antibiotics Antibiotics available; Vaccination using Replenish fluids
cutaneous, possibly most recover without live attenuated and electrolytes;
inhalation, anthrax. antibiotics within organisms reduces antibiotics
Cutaneous anthrax 5 d to 10 d; do not use severity and (tetracycline,
responds to antibiotics antidiarrheal agents transmittability; ciprofloxicin,
(penicillin, terramycin, antibiotics and
chloromycetin), sulfa- (streptomycin, erythromycin)
diazine and immune aureomycin, enhance
serum. Pulmonary chloromycetin, effectiveness of
(inhaled) anthrax doxycycline, rehydration and
responds to immune tetracycline, and reduce organism
serum in initial stages chloramphenical) in body
but is little use after
disease is well
established. Intestinal,
same as for pulmonary
Potential as High, Iraqi and USSR Unknown Unknown High, if delivered Not appropriate
Biological biological programs via aerosol form for aerosol
Agent worked to develop (highly infectious, delivery
anthrax as a bio- 90 % to 100 %)
weapon
19
Table 3−5. Bacterial agents-Continued
Biological Plague (Bubonic

Agent/Disease Diphtheria Glanders Melioidosis and Pneumonic) Typhoid Fever
Likely Method Unknown 1. Aerosol 1. Food 1. Infected fleas 1. Contact with
of Dissemi- 2. Cutaneous contamination (Bubonic and infected person
nation (rodent feces) Pneumonic) 2. Contact with
2. Inhalation 2. Aerosol contaminated
3. Insect bites (Pneumonic) substances
4. Direct contact
with infected
animals
Transmissible High High No High (Pneumonic) High
Person to
Person
Incubation 2 d to 5 d 3 d to 5 d Days 1 d to 3 d 7 d to 14 d
Period
Duration of Unknown Unknown 4 d to 20 d 1 d to 6 d (usually Unknown
Illness fatal)
Lethality 5 % to 10 % fatality 50 % to 70 % Variable 5 % to 10 % if <1 % if treated
treated; 10 % to 14 % if
Bubonic: 30 % to untreated
75 % if untreated
Pneumonic: 95 % if
untreated
Vaccine DPT vaccine 85 % No vaccine No vaccine Vaccine not Oral vaccine (Vivotif)
Efficacy effective; booster available and single dose
(for aerosol recommended every injectable vaccine
exposure)/ 10 yr (capsular poly-
Antitoxin saccharide antigen);
both vaccines are
equally effective and
offer 65 % to 75 %
protection against the
disease
Symptoms and Local infection usually Skin lesions, Cough, fever, Enlarged lymph Prolonged fever,
Effects in respiratory passages; ulcers in skin, chills, muscle/joint nodes in groin; lymph tissue
delay in treatment can mucous pain, nausea, and septicemic (spleen, involvement;
cause damage to heart, membranes, and vomiting; lungs, meninges ulceration of
kidneys, and central viscera; if progressing to affected) intestines;
nervous system inhaled, upper death enlargement of
respiratory tract spleen; rose-colored
involvement spots on skin;
constipation or
diarrhea
Treatment Antitoxin extremely Drug therapy Antibiotics Doxycycline Antibiotics
effective; antibiotic (streptomycin and (doxycycline, (100 mg 2x/d for (amoxicillin or
(penicillin) shortens the sulfadiazine) is chlorothenicol, 7 d); ciprofloxicin cotrimoxazole)
duration of illness somewhat tetracycline), and also effective shorten period of
effective sulfadiazine communicability and
cure disease rapidly
Potential as Very low––symptoms Unknown Moderate––rare High––highly Not likely to be
Biological not severe enough to disease, no vaccine infectious, deployed via aerosol;
Agent incapacitate; rare cases available particularly in more likely for covert
of severe infection pneumonic (aerosol) contamination of
form; lack of water or food.
stability and loss of
virulence
complicate its use
20
Table 3−6. Viral agents
Biological Rift Valley Venezuelan Equine

Agent/Disease Marburg Virus Junin Virus Fever Virus Smallpox Encephalitis
Likely Method of Aerosol Epidemiology not Mosquito-borne; in Aerosol 1. Aerosol
Dissemination known biological 2. Infected vectors
scenario, aerosols
or droplets
Transmissible Unknown Unknown Unknown High No
Person to Person
Incubation Period 5 d to 7 d 7 d to 16 d 2 d to 5 d 10 d to 12 d 1 d to 6 d
Duration of Unknown 16 d 2 d to 5 d 4 wk Days to weeks
Illness
Lethality 25 % 18 % <1 % 20 % to 40 % 1 % to 60 %
(Viriole major)
<1 % (Viriole
minor)
Vaccine Efficacy No vaccine No vaccine Inactivated vaccine Vaccine protects Experimental only:
(for aerosol available in limited against infection TC−83 protects
exposure)/ quantities within 3 d to 5 d of against 30 LD50s to
Antitoxin exposure 500 LD50 s in
hamsters
Symptoms and Sudden onset of Hemorrhagic Febrile illness, Sudden onset of Sudden illness with
Effects fever, malaise, syndrome, chills, sometimes fever, headache, malaise, spiking
muscle pain, sweating, abdominal backache, vomiting, fevers, rigors, severe
headache and exhaustion and tenderness; rarely marked prostration, headache,
conjunctivitis, stupor shock, ocular and delirium; small photophobia and
followed by sore problems blisters form crusts myalgias
throat, vomiting, which fall off 10 d
diarrhea, rash, and to 40 d after first
both internal and lesions appear;
external bleeding opportunistic
(begins 5th day). infection
Liver function may
be abnormal and
platelet function
may be impaired.
Treatment No specific No specific No studies, but IV Vaccinia immune Supportive
treatment exists. therapy; ribavirin (30 mg/ globulin (VIG), and treatments only
Severe cases require supportive kg/6 h for 4 d, then supportive therapy
intensive supportive therapy essential 7.5 mg/kg/8 h for
care, as patients are 6 d) should be
frequently effective
dehydrated and in
need of intravenous
fluids.
Potential as High––actually Unknown Difficulties with Possible, especially High––former US
Biological Agent weaponized by mosquitos as since routine and USSR offensive
former Soviet vectors smallpox biological programs
Union biological vaccination weaponized both
program programs have been liquid and dry forms
eliminated world- for aerosol
wide (part of USSR distribution.
offense bioprogram)
21
Table 3−6. Viral agents-Continued
Congo-Crimean
Biological Hemorrhagic
Agent/Disease Yellow Fever Virus Dengue Fever Virus Ebola Virus Fever Virus
Likely Method of Mosquito-borne Mosquito-borne 1. Direct contact Unknown
Dissemination 2. Aerosol (BA)
Transmissible No No Moderate Yes

Person to Person
Incubation Period 3 d to 6 d 3 d to 15 d 4 d to 16 d 7 d to 12 d
Duration of 2 wk 1 wk Death between 7 d to 9 d to 12 d

Illness 16 d
Lethality 10 % to 20 % death in 5 % average case High for Zaire strain; 15 % to 20 %
severe cases or full fatality by producing moderate with Sudan
recovery after 2 d to shock and hemorrhage,
3d leading to death
Vaccine Efficacy Vaccine available; Vaccine available No vaccine No vaccine available;
(for aerosol confers immunity for prophylactic ribavirin
exposure)/ >10 yr may be effective
Antitoxin
Symptoms and Sudden onset of chills, Sudden onset of fever, Mild febrile illness, Fever, easy bleeding,
Effects fever, prostration, chills, intense then vomiting, petechiae, hypotension
aches, muscular pain, headache, pain behind diarrhea, rash, kidney and shock; flushing of
congestion, severe eyes, joint and muscle and liver failure, face and chest, edema,
gastrointestinal pain, exhaustion and internal and external vomiting, diarrhea
disturbances, liver prostration hemorrhage (begins 5th
damage and jaundice; day), and petechiae
hemorrhage from skin
and gums
Treatment No specific treatment; No specific therapy; No specific therapy; No specific treatment
supportive treatment supportive therapy supportive therapy
(bed rest and fluids) essential essential
for even the mildest
cases
Potential as High, if efficient Unknown Former Soviet Union Unknown
Biological Agent dissemination device is
employed
22
Table 3−7. Rickettsiae
Biological Rocky Mountain

Agent/Disease Endemic Typhus Epidemic Typhus Q Fever Spotted Fever
Likely Method of 1. Contaminated 1. Contaminated feces 1. Sabotage (food Infected wood ticks
Dissemination feces 2. Infected insect supply)
2. Infected insect larvae 2. Aerosol
larvae
3. Rat or flea bites
Transmissible No No Rare No
Person to Person
Incubation 6 d to 14 d 6 d to 15 d 14 d to 26 d 3 d to 14 d
Period
Duration Unknown Unknown Weeks Unknown
of Illness
Lethality 1 %, increasing in 10 % to 40 % Very low 15 % to 20 %
people >50 yr old untreated; increases untreated, (higher in
with age adults); treated—death
rare with specific
therapy (tetracycline or
chloramphenicol)
Vaccine Efficacy Unknown Vaccine confers 94 % protection No vaccine
(for aerosol protection of uncertain against 3500 LD50 s in
exposure)/ duration guinea pigs
Antitoxin
Symptoms Sudden onset of Sudden onset of Mild symptoms Fever and joint pain,
and Effects headache, chills, headache, chills, (chills, headaches, muscular pain; skin
prostration, fever, prostration, fever, pain; fever, chest pains, rash that spreads
pain; maculae maculae eruption on 5th perspiration, loss of rapidly from ankles and
eruption on 5th day to day to 6th day on upper appetite) wrists to legs, arms,
6th day on upper body, spreading to all and chest; aversion to
body, spreading to all but palms, soles, or light
but palms, soles, or face
face, but milder than
epidemic form
Treatment Antibiotics Antibiotics Tetracycline (500 mg/ Antibiotics—
(tetracycline and (tetracycline and 6 h, 5 d to 7 d) or tetracycline or
chloramphenicol); chloramphenicol); doxycycline (100 mg/ chloramphenicol
supportive treatment supportive treatment 12 h, 5 d to 7 d) also,
and prevention of and prevention of combined Erthy-
secondary infections secondary infections romycin (500 mg/6 h)
and rifampin
(600 mg/d)
Potential Uncertain––broad Uncertain––broad Highly infectious, is Unknown
as Biological range of incubation range of incubation delivered in aerosol
Agent (6 d to 14 d) period (6 d to 14 d) period form. Dried agent is
could cause infection could cause infection of very stable; stable in
of force deploying force deploying aerosol form.
biological agent biological agent
23
Table 3−8. Biological toxins
Biological Staphylococcal Tricothecene Ricin (Isolated

Agent/Disease Botulinum Toxin enterotoxin B mycotoxins from Castor Beans) Saxitoxin
Likely Method 1. Aerosol 1. Sabotage (food 1. Aerosol 1. Aerosol Contaminated
of Dissemination 2. Sabotage (food supply) 2. Sabotage 2. Sabotage (food shellfish; in
and water) 2. Aerosol and water) biological scenario,
inhalation or toxic
projectile
Transmissible No No No No No
Person to Person
Incubation Variable (hours to 3 h to 12 h 2 h to 4 h Hours to days 5 min to 1 h
Period days)
Duration Death in 24 h to Hours Days to months Days––death within Death in 2 h to 12 h
of Illness 72 h; lasts months 10 d to 12 d for
if not lethal ingestion
Lethality 5 % to 60 %, <1 % Moderate 100 %, without High without
untreated treatment respiratory support
<5 % treated
Vaccine Efficacy Botulism antitoxin No vaccine No vaccine No vaccine No vaccine
(for aerosol (IND)
exposure)/ Prophylaxis toxoid
Antitoxin (IND)
Toxolide
Symptoms Ptosis; weakness, Sudden chills, Skin––pain, Weakness, fever, Light headedness,
and Effects dizziness, dry fever, headache, pruritis, redness cough, pulmonary tingling of
mouth and throat, myalgia, and vesicles, edema, severe extremities, visual
blurred vision and nonproductive sloughing of respiratory distress disturbances,
diplopia, flaccid cough, nausea, epidermis; memory loss,
paralysis vomiting and respiratory––nose respiratory distress,
diarrhea and throat pain, death
discharge,
sneezing,
coughing, chest
pain, hemoptysis
Treatment Antitoxin with Pain relievers and No specific Oxygen, plus drugs Induce vomiting,
respiratory support cough suppressants antidote or to reduce provide respiratory
(ventilation) for mild cases; for therapeutic inflammation and care, including
severe cases, may regimen is support cardiac and artificial respiration
need mechanical available; circulatory
breathing and fluid supportive and functions; if
replenishment symptomatic care ingested, empty the
stomach and
intestines; replace
lost fluids
Potential Not very toxic via Moderate––could High––used in Has been used in Moderate, aerosol
as Biological aerosol route; be used in food aerosol form 1978––Markov form is highly toxic
Agent extremely lethal if and limited (“yellow rain”) in murder (see ref. 7).
delivered orally. amounts of water Laos, Kampuchea Included on
Since covert (for example, at and Afghanistan prohibited Schedule
poisoning is salad bars); LD 50 is (through 1981) I chemicals list for
indistinguishable sufficiently small Chemical Weapons
from natural to prevent Convention; high
botulism, detection potential for use in
poisoning could aerosol form
have limited use
24
4. OVERVIEW OF RESPIRATORY PROTECTION SYSTEMS
In the context of PPE, respiratory protection systems or respirators provide protection by

preventing the inhalation of harmful airborne substances and/or an oxygen-deficient atmosphere.
Although there are many forms of respirators, they generally fall into the following two classes:
air-purifying respirators and atmosphere-supplying respirators.
The type of fit and the mode of operation can further subcategorize both classes. Each class of
respirator may be tight-fitting or loose-fitting. Tight-fitting respirators include facemasks made
of flexible molded rubber, silicone, neoprene, or other materials. Typical designs incorporate
rubber or woven elastic head straps. Tight-fitting respirators are available in three basic
configurations. The first, called a “quarter-mask,” covers the mouth and nose, and the lower
sealing surface rests between chin and mouth. A second type, the “half-mask,” fits over the nose
and under the chin. Half-masks are designed to seal more reliably than quarter-masks, so they are
preferred for use against greater hazards. A third type, the “full-facepiece,” covers from roughly
the hairline to below the chin. Typically, they provide the greatest protection, usually seal most
reliably, and provide eye protection as well.
Generally, loose-fitting respirators enclose at least the head. A variety of configurations include
hoods, helmets, and blouses. A light flexible device covering only the head and neck, or head,
neck, and shoulders, is called a hood. If rigid protective headgear is incorporated into the design,
it is called a helmet. Blouses extend down to the waist and some have wrist-length sleeves. Since
these respirators are not tight-fitting, it is important that sufficient air is provided to maintain a
slight positive pressure inside the hood relative to the environment immediately outside. In this
way, an outward flow of air from the respirator prevents contaminants from entering the wearers
breathing zone.
4.1 Air-Purifying Respirators
Air-purifying respirators are devices that contain a filter, cartridge, or canister that removes
specific air contaminants by passing the ambient air through the air-purifying element before it is
inhaled by the wearer. Elements that remove particulates are called filters, while vapor- and gas-
removing elements are called either chemical cartridges or canisters. These respirators do not
supply oxygen and must only be used when the surrounding atmosphere contains sufficient
oxygen to sustain life, and the air contaminant level is below the concentration limits of the air-
purifying element.
Filters and canisters or cartridges are the functional portions of air-purifying respirators, and they
can generally be removed and replaced once their effective life has expired. Exceptions are
filtering facepiece respirators, commonly referred to as “disposable respirators,” “dust masks,” or
“single-use respirators,” which cannot be cleaned, disinfected, or recharged after use. Air-
purifying respirators are grouped into three functional types: particulate removing, vapor and gas
removing, and combination. These respirators may be nonpowered or powered.
1. Particulate-removing respirators are designed to reduce inhaled concentrations of harmful

aerosols and dusts by filtering most of the contaminants from the inhaled air before they
25
enter the breathing zone of the wearer. Different types of filtration technologies include
mechanical filters (high efficiency particulate air (HEPA), and ultra low penetration air
(ULPA)), electrostatic filters (which incorporate electrostatic charges into the filter medium),
and membrane technologies (which provide physically separate air particles based on their
size and geometry).
2. Vapor- and gas-removing respirators use sorbent chemicals such as activated charcoal or
catalysts to remove (adsorb and/or absorb) specific gases and vapors from ambient air before
they can enter the breathing zone of the wearer.
3. Combination cartridges and canisters are available to protect against particulates, as well as
vapors and gases. An example of a combined vapor separation and particulate separation
technology is the C2A1 canister, part of the M40 protective mask. The C2A1 canister
contains HEPA filter layered with tetraethylene diamine (ASZM-TEDA) activated carbon
vapor filter.
Three examples of air-purifying respirators are shown in figure 4−1, figure 4−2, and figure 4−3.
Figure 4−1. Panorama Nova Full Figure 4−2. MSA Phalanx CBA/RCA
Facepiece, Draeger Safety, Inc. Gas Mask, MSA
Figure 4−3. Survivair® Belt Mounted PAPR, Survivair, A

Division of Bacou USA Safety, Inc.
26
4.1.1 Filtration Mechanisms
There are two types of particulate filters: absolute and nonabsolute. Absolute filters use
screening to remove particles from the air; i.e., they exclude the particles that are larger than the
pores. However, most respirator filters are nonabsolute filters, which means they contain pores
that are larger than the particles to be removed. They use combinations of interception capture,
sedimentation capture, inertial impaction capture, diffusion capture, and electrostatic capture to
remove the particles. The exact combination of filtration mechanisms that comes into play
depends upon the flowrate through the filter and the size of the particle. Brief descriptions of
these filtration mechanisms follow:
1. Interception Capture. As the air streams approach a fiber lying perpendicular to their path,
they split and compress in order to flow around the fiber and rejoin on the other side. If the
center of a particle in these airstreams comes within one particle radius of the fiber, it
encounters the fiber surface and is captured. As particle size increases, the probability of
interception capture increases. The particles do not deviate from their original streamline in
this mechanism.
2. Sedimentation Capture. Only large particles (2 µ and larger) are captured by sedimentation.
Since this type of capture relies on gravity to pull particles from the airstream, flowrate
through the filter must be low.
3. Inertial Impaction Capture. As the airstreams split and change direction suddenly to go
around the fiber, particles with sufficient inertia cannot change direction sufficiently to avoid
the fiber. Thus, they impact on the surface of the fiber. The size, density, speed, and shape of
the particle determine its inertia.
4. Diffusion Capture. The motion of smaller particles is affected by air molecules colliding with
them. The particles can then randomly cross the air stream and encounter the fiber as they
pass. This random motion is dependent on particle size and the air temperature. As the
particle size decreases and air temperature increases, the diffusive activity of the particle
increases, which increases the probability of capture. Lower flow rate through the filter also
increases the probability of capture because the particle spends more time in the area of the
fiber.
5. Electrostatic Capture. In electrostatic capture, the target particles have a natural charge and
the filter fibers are designed with the opposite charge. Therefore, the particles are attracted to
the fibers. The electrostatic capture mechanism aids the other capture mechanisms, especially
interception and diffusion.
4.1.2 Vapor and Gas Removal Mechanisms
Vapor-and gas-removing respirators normally remove the contaminant by interaction of its

molecules with a granular, porous material, commonly called the sorbent. The general method by
which the molecules are removed is called sorption. In addition to sorption, some respirators use
27
catalysts, which react with the contaminant to produce a less toxic gas or vapor. Three removal
mechanisms are used in vapor- and gas-removing respirators.
1. Adsorption retains the contaminant molecule on the surface of the sorbent granule by
physical attraction. The intensity of the attraction varies with the type of sorbent and
contaminant. Adsorption by physical attraction holds the adsorbed molecules weakly.
However, if chemical forces are involved, as in the process called chemisorption, the bonds
holding the molecules to the sorbent granules are much stronger and can be broken only with
great difficulty.
Activated charcoal is the most common adsorbent. It is used primarily to remove organic
vapors. Activated charcoal also can be impregnated with other substances to make it more
selective against specific gases and vapors. Examples are activated charcoal impregnated
with iodine to remove mercury vapor, with metallic oxides to remove acid gases, and with
salts of metals to remove ammonia gas. Other sorbents that could be used in vapor and gas
removing respirators include molecular sieves, activated alumina, and silica gel.
2. Absorption may also be used to remove gases and vapors. Absorbents differ from adsorbents
in that, although they are porous, they do not have as large a specific surface area.
Absorption is also different because the gas or vapor molecules usually penetrate deeply into
the molecular spaces throughout the sorbent and are held there chemically. Absorption may
not be able to occur without prior adsorption on the surface of the particles. Furthermore,
adsorption occurs instantaneously, whereas absorption is slower. Most absorbents are used
for protection against acid gases. They include mixtures of sodium or potassium hydroxide
with lime and/or caustic silicates.
3. Catalysts are substances that influence the rate of chemical reaction between other
substances. A catalyst used in respirator cartridges and canisters is hopcalite, a mixture of
porous granules of manganese and copper oxides that speeds the reaction between toxic
carbon monoxide and oxygen to form carbon dioxide.
As applied to respirators, the vapor and gas removal processes described are essentially 100 %
efficient until the sorbent’s capacity to adsorb vapor and gas or catalyze their reaction is
exhausted. Then the contaminant will pass completely through the sorbent and into the facepiece.
This is in contrast to mechanical particulate-removing filters that become more efficient as
matter collects on their surface and plugs the spaces between the fibers. This difference is
important to remember. Water vapor reduces the effectiveness of some sorbents and increases
that of others. For example, increasing moisture content of a sorbent designed to sorb acid gases
may increase sorbent efficiency since most acid gases normally dissolve in water. Vapor- and
gas-removing cartridges should be protected from the atmosphere while in storage.
4.1.3 Filter Efficiency and Efficiency Degradation
Filter efficiency indicates the percentage of particles the filter can remove from the air. Filter
efficiency degradation is the lowering of filter efficiency or a reduction in the ability of the filter to
remove particles. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations
28
establish nine classes of filters (three levels of filter efficiency, each with three categories of
resistance to filter efficiency degradation). The three levels of filter efficiency are 95 %, 99 %, and
99.97 %. The three categories of resistance to filter efficiency degradation are labeled N (not for
resistance to oil), R (for resistance to oil), and P (oil proof). The class of filter should be clearly
marked on the filter, filter package, or respirator box. For example, a filter marked N95 would
mean an N series filter that is at least 95 % efficient. Combination cartridges that include
particulate filter elements carry a similar marking that pertains only to the particulate filter element.
4.1.4 Powered Air-Purifying Respirators (PAPR)
A PAPR uses a blower to force the ambient atmosphere through air purifying elements to the inlet
covering. The covering may be a facepiece, helmet, hood, or blouse. PAPRs reduce the burden
caused by drawing air through the filter element, therefore allowing the wearer to breathe easier.
PAPRs come in several different configurations. One configuration consists of the air-purifying
element(s) attached to a small blower that is worn on the belt and is connected to the respiratory
inlet covering by a flexible tube. The device is usually powered by a small battery, either mounted
separately on the belt or as part of the blower. Some units are powered by an external DC or AC
source. Another type of PAPR consists of the air-purifying element attached to a stationary blower,
usually mounted on a vehicle, powered by a battery or an external power source and connected by
a long flexible tube to the respiratory inlet covering. The third type of powered air-purifying
respirator consists of a helmet or facepiece to which the air-purifying element and blower are
attached. Only the battery is carried on the belt.
4.2 Atmosphere-Supplying Respirators
Atmosphere-supplying respirators provide clean breathing air from an uncontaminated source

independent of the surrounding atmosphere instead of removing contaminants from the
atmosphere. These respirators are grouped by the method that is used to supply air and the way
in which the air supply is regulated. The three principle classes of atmosphere-supplying
respirators are self-contained breathing apparatus, supplied-air respirators, and combination self-
contained and supplied-air respirators.
1. Self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) is much like the apparatus a SCUBA diver or
firefighter might use. Air is supplied from a compressed air cylinder, usually through a full-
face mask, which is worn on the back. This generally allows greater movement than a
supplied-air respirator; however, the air supply is limited.
2. Supplied-air respirators (SAR) (also called airline respirators) usually involve a facemask or
hood connected to a stationary source of compressed air by a hose. The air is delivered
continuously or intermittently in a sufficient volume to meet the wearer’s breathing
requirements. Obviously, the length of the hose connection, and the dangers of damage to or
crimping of the hose, restrict the user.
3. Combination respirators have a small, auxiliary self-contained air supply that can be used if
the primary supply (either by SCBA or SAR) is interrupted or fails.
29
4.2.1 Open-Circuit vs. Closed-Circuit SCBA
Self-contained breathing apparatus’ (SCBAs) are available as open-circuit systems or closed-

circuit systems. Open-circuit systems exhaust the exhaled air to the atmosphere instead of
recirculating it. For example, an open-circuit SCBA utilizes a cylinder of compressed air that
supplies air to a regulator, which reduces the pressure for delivery to the facepiece. The regulator
is either mounted directly to the facepiece, or a flexible hose connects the regulator to a
facepiece. The service life of the open-circuit SCBA is usually shorter than the closed-circuit
SCBA because the compressed air cylinder must provide the total breathing volume
requirements since there is no recirculation. Most open-circuit SCBA have a published useful
period of 30 min to 60 min. However, these times may be cut in half with moderate to heavy
workloads.
Another name for a closed-circuit SCBA is a rebreather device, indicative of its mode of
operation. The breathing gas is rebreathed after the exhaled carbon dioxide has been removed
(scrubbed) and the oxygen content restored by a compressed or liquid oxygen source or an
oxygen-generating solid. These devices are designed primarily for 1 h to 4 h use in toxic and/or
oxygen-deficient atmospheres. Figure 4−4, figure 4−5, and figure 4−6 illustrate three supplied air
systems. The SCBA is the Draeger AirBoss PSS100 from Draeger Safety, Inc.; the rebreather is
the Biomarine BioPak 240 Rebreather, from Biomarine, Inc., and the airline respirator is the
ARAP/C and ARAP/E Airline Respirator, from International Safety Instruments.
4.2.2 Airflow Regulators
Regulators within atmosphere-supplying respirators provide three types of airflow: demand

(negative pressure regulator), pressure demand (positive pressure regulator), and continuous
flow.
Figure 4−4. Draeger AirBoss Figure 4−5. Biomarine BioPak Figure 4−6. ARAP/C and
PSS100, Draeger Safety, Inc. 240 Rebreather, Biomarine, Inc. ARAP/E Airline Respirator,
International Safety Instruments
In a demand or negative pressure regulator, the air supply valve stays closed as long as there is
positive pressure in the facepiece (during exhalation). Inhalation creates negative pressure in the
30
facepiece, and the supply valve opens, allowing air into the facepiece. In other words, air flows
into the facepiece only on “demand” by the wearer.
A pressure-demand or positive pressure regulator is very similar to a demand type except for a
spring that tends to hold the supply valve slightly open, theoretically allowing continual air flow
into the facepiece. However, all pressure-demand devices have a special exhalation valve that
maintains positive backpressure in the facepiece and opens only when the pressure exceeds that
value. This combination of modified regulator and special exhalation valve is designed to
maintain positive pressure in the facepiece at all times. Under certain conditions, a momentary
negative pressure may occur in the wearer’s breathing zone, although the regulator still supplies
additional air on “demand.” Because of the positive pressure, any leakage should be outward;
therefore, a pressure-demand system provides very good protection. Contrary to common belief,
the pressure-demand SCBA has the same service time as a demand version of the same device, if
it seals properly on the wearer’s face. Any leakage increases air consumption and decreases
service time.
Continuous-flow regulators maintain airflow at all times, rather than only on demand. In place of
a demand or pressure-demand regulator, an airflow control valve or orifice partially controls the
airflow. This means that by design, either the control valve cannot be closed completely, or a
continually open bypass is provided to allow air to flow around the valve, maintaining positive
flow rate. Continuous-flow regulators are used only with SARs and not SCBAs.
4.3 Escape Masks
Several models of escape masks are also included in this guide. Some escape masks are
disposable and others can be reused but offer a minimum duration of protection. Figure 4−7
shows the disposable Parat NBC Escape Hood by Draeger, Inc., and figure 4−8 shows an
emergency escape breathing apparatus, the Spiroscape Escape BA by Interspiro, Inc.
Figure 4−7. Parat NBC Escape Figure 4−8. Spiroscape Escape BA, Interspiro Inc.
Hood, Draeger Safety, Inc.
31
5. PERCUTANEOUS PROTECTION
Percutaneous protection or “chemical protective clothing” is designed to protect the skin from
harmful exposure by either physical or chemical means. Chemical protective clothing can be
classified by design and performance. Categorizing clothing by design means describing what
areas of the body the clothing item is intended to protect. Categorizing clothing by performance
means describing the relative level of protection the garments provide the wearer against liquid,
aerosol, and vapor hazards.
5.1 Types of Chemical Protective Clothing
This guide groups chemical protective clothing into five principle classes: gas-tight
encapsulating suits, liquid splash-protective suits, permeable protective suits, nonhazardous
chemical protective clothing, and other protective apparel such as chemically resistant hoods,
gloves, and boots.
5.1.1 Gas-Tight Encapsulating Suits
Gas-tight encapsulating suits provide a vapor-protective barrier that completely covers the
wearer and their respirator. These suits are intended for response situations where no chemical
contact (neither liquid nor vapor) is permissible. This type of suit is equivalent to the clothing
required in EPA’s Level A. Figure 5−1 and figure 5−2 illustrate an EPA Level A fully
encapsulated suit and a Level A ensemble, respectively.
Figure 5−1. Tychem ® BR EX Commander Level Figure 5−2. Tychem ® TK EX Commander

A Fully Encapsulating Suit, DuPont Tyvek ® Brigade Level A Ensemble, NFPA 1991
Protective Apparel certified, DuPont Tyvek ® Protective Apparel
33
5.1.2 Liquid Splash-Protective Suits
Liquid splash-protective suits are available as nongas-tight encapsulating suits, coveralls, or two-
piece overgarments. These types of garments are made of essentially impermeable materials that
offer protection against liquid chemicals in the form of splashes, but not against continuous
liquid contact or chemical vapors. By wearing liquid splash-protective clothing, the wearer risks
potential exposure to chemical vapors or gases because this clothing does not offer gas-tight
performance. At best, these garments will meet the EPA Level B needs. Examples of EPA Level
B garments are shown in figure 5−3, figure 5−4, and figure 5−5.
Figure 5−3. Tychem ® SL Figure 5−4. Kappler Responder ® Figure 5−5. Lakeland Tyvek ®
Utility Level B Fully Level B Coverall with attached QC Level B Coverall with
Encapsulating Suit, DuPont hood, Kappler Safety Group collar, Lakeland Industries, Inc.
Tyvek ® Protective Apparel
5.1.3 Permeable Protective Suits
Permeable protective suits are available as nongas-tight encapsulating suits, coveralls, or two-
piece overgarments, as well as protective undergarments. These types of garments are made of
fabric that is permeable or semi-permeable to most molecules but also chemically alters or
physically removes certain toxic materials before they can reach the skin. These garments are
typically used by the military and can be worn for extended periods in situations that present a
limited exposure to hazardous vapors and gases. It is important to note that these garments are
not designed to protect against many common industrial chemicals. An example of protective
clothing that uses adsorptive technology is the Saratoga Joint Service Lightweight Integrated Suit
(JSLIST), from Tex-Shield, Inc., shown in figure 5−6.
34
Figure 5−6. Saratoga Joint Service Lightweight
Integrated Suit (JSLIST), Tex-Shield, Inc.
5.1.4 Nonhazardous Chemical Protective Clothing
Nonhazardous chemical protective clothing include garments made of traditional textiles that
allow vapors and liquids to pass through and, therefore, do not offer protection against highly
toxic CB agents and TIMs. These garments are generally used to keep the wearer free of dusts,
soils, stains, and electrostatic charge.
5.1.5 Other Protective Apparel
Other protective apparel includes ancillary clothing items and accessories that complete or
supplement a particular protective ensemble (e.g., hoods, aprons, sleeves, gloves, boots and boot
covers, and tape). These items are generally intended for use in situations where the physical
contact with hazardous material is limited and the hazard is completely characterized.
5.2 Material Chemical Resistance
The protective fabric technology and the protective clothing design are the two components that
provide necessary protection from percutaneous hazards of CB agents and TIMs. Ideally, the
selected fabrics that make up chemical protective clothing must resist permeation, degradation,
and penetration by the respective chemicals.
5.2.1 Permeation
Permeation is the process by which a chemical dissolves in or moves through a material on a

molecular basis. The higher the “rate of permeation,” the faster a particular chemical will move
through a select material. In most cases, there will be no visible evidence of chemicals
35
permeating a material. The rate of permeation can be influenced by several factors such as
chemical concentration, material thickness, humidity, temperature, and pressure. Permeation
“breakthrough time” is the most common result used to assess material chemical compatibility.
The time it takes a chemical to permeate completely through a particular material under a set of
standardized conditions is the breakthrough time. Breakthrough time is determined by applying a
particular chemical on the exterior surface of a fabric and measuring the time it takes to detect
the chemical on the inside surface. The breakthrough time gives some indication of how long a
garment can be used before the chemical will permeate through the material.
5.2.2 Degradation
Degradation involves physical changes in a material as the result of chemical exposure, use, or
ambient conditions (e.g., heat or sunlight). The most common observations of material
degradation are discoloration, swelling, loss of physical strength, or deterioration.
5.2.3 Penetration
Penetration is the movement of chemicals through fabric joints or openings such as zippers,
seams, pinholes, or imperfections in a protective clothing material.
5.3 Service Life
Some manufacturers of protective clothing provide a recommended service life for their suits and
apparel. Ultimately, clothing item service life is a user decision, depending on the costs and risks
associated with clothing decontamination and reuse. Protective clothing may be labeled as
reusable (for multiple wearings) or disposable (for one-time use).
Descriptive distinctions between these types of clothing are both vague and complicated.
Disposable clothing is generally lightweight and inexpensive. Reusable clothing is often more
rugged and costly. Nevertheless, extensive contamination of any garment may render it unfit for
reuse. The basis of this classification really depends on the costs involved in purchasing,
maintaining, and reusing protective clothing versus the alternative of disposing the protective
clothing following exposure. If a user can anticipate using a garment several times while still
maintaining adequate protection, the suit becomes reusable.
5.4 Percutaneous Protection Technologies
Technologies for percutaneous protection include the materials and material treatments.
Technologies are divided into permeable material treatments, permeable sorptive materials,
engineered permeable materials, and impermeable materials.
5.4.1 Permeable Material Treatments
Permeable materials are traditional textiles that allow vapors and liquids to pass through and,
therefore, do not offer protective properties against CB agents and TIMs. These materials, when
used in combination with treatments and finishes, have enhanced protective capabilities.
36
Examples of treatment technologies include high surface tension technology, wicking
technology, and electrostatic surface treatments. Treatments and finishes can be applied when the
material is fabricated or when the garment is assembled. Permeable material treatments are
further divided into high surface tension technologies (HSTT), wicking technologies, and
electrostatic surface treatment technologies.
5.4.2 Permeable Sorptive Materials
Permeable sorptive materials provide protection from vapor-phase contaminants by trapping

vapors as they pass through the fabric. However, these materials do not protect as well against
aerosols and liquids. Permeable sorptive materials are subdivided into activated carbon and
zeolites. Activated carbon, or activated charcoal, has been used historically for protection against
chemical agents, but it has limited performance, especially in humid environments. Carbon can
also sorb contaminants such as petroleum, oils, and lubricants (POLs). Zeolites can be either
naturally occurring or synthetic. Synthetic zeolites, also called molecular sieves, can be
engineered with reactive sites to tailor specificity.
5.4.3 Engineered Permeable Materials
Engineered permeable materials have been specifically engineered to restrict the penetration of
toxic contaminants through the material but still allow water vapor transmission for evaporative
cooling and personal comfort. Permeable sorptive technologies include semi-permeable
membranes, carbon-loaded semi-permeable membranes, nanofiber membranes, and reactive
material technologies. Semi-permeable membrane technology is probably the most familiar and
is commercially recognized as Gore-Tex, which uses an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene
(PTFE) polymer film. The carbon-loaded semi-permeable membrane technology was most
recently evaluated for use in the Joint Service Lightweight Integrated Suit Technology (JSLIST)
program.
5.4.4 Impermeable Materials
Impermeable materials prevent permeation of aerosols, liquids, and vapors. This applies to
exterior contaminated air as well as to moisture and vapor produced by the user, creating
uncomfortable environments when used for personal protective items. Impermeable materials are
categorized in three major groups: homogeneous materials, laminates, and composites. Butyl
rubber (used for boots, gloves, and suits) is an example of a homogeneous material. Laminates
are produced by bonding two or more layers of material together. Combinations of different
materials allow for optimization of the laminate properties. Currently, this technology is used as
a base material for the Self-Contained Toxicological Environmental Protective Overgarment
(STEPO).
5.4.5 Some Commercial Product Names and Technologies
The following table lists the names of some commercial products that are used in producing
certain kinds of personal protective clothing (e.g., gloves, aprons, vests, and suits). This list gives
the name of the manufacturer, a brief description of the material, and examples of what
37
kinds of personal protective clothing are made from these materials. For more complete
descriptions of the products and their uses and limitations, users should consult their safety
equipment supplier and/or the manufacturer.
Table 5−1. Trade names, manufacturers, and descriptions of commonly used materials
Trade Name Manufacturer Description

4HTM Safety 4, Inc. Multi-layer laminate of polyethylene (PE) and ethylene-vinyl alcohol (EVOH
[ISO 1043−1] or EVAL)––offers protection against exposure to many
chemicals and mixtures.
Barricade TM DuPont A chemical barrier fabric (multilayer laminate) that provides excellent chemical
resistance.
ChemrelTM Chemron UK Multi-layered film barrier composites, laminated onto a soft polypropylene
substrate; encapsulated suits made from different Chemrel (TM) fabrics are
available, providing protection against different chemicals and gases.
KevlarTM DuPont Aramid (aromatic polyamide) fiber––tough textile fiber used in protective
clothing where resistance to cuts, heat, bullets or flying fragments is needed.
NomexTM DuPont High-temperature-resistant aramid (aromatic polyamide) fiber; resistant to a
wide range of industrial chemicals and solvents.
ResponderTM Life-Guard Multi-film material designed to offer a high degree of permeation resistance to
a broad range of chemicals; also used in Level A vapor protective suits (totally
encapsulated chemical [TECP] suits).
SaranexTM Dow Chemical Multi-layer coextruded film made from polyethylene (PE), polyvinylidene
Company chloride (PVDC), and ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA or EVAC [ISO 1043−1
abbrev.]). Used as a coating for protective clothing.
Silver Siebe North A laminate material that offers excellent protection against a wide range of
ShieldTM Inc. chemicals and solvents but does not have good cut resistance. Can be used as an
inner glove to enhance protection where cuts/mechanical damage are likely.
Teflon TM DuPont Fluorocarbon polymers made from tetrafluoroethylene (TFE) or a mixture of
tetrafluoroethylene and hexafluoropropylene. Has excellent chemical and
thermal resistance but poor physical strength properties; is combined with other
materials in protective clothing.
TrellchemTM Trelleborg Trade name of a range of chemical protective suits. All are made with a
Protective polyamide fabric coated with different materials for the outside and inside
Products AB layers, offering protection against exposure to wide range of chemicals; some
suits (HPS, VPS, TLU-A) meet NFPA flammability test criteria.
Trellchem HPS (High Performance Suit)TM––VitonTM and butyl rubber outside
and a polymer barrier laminate inside.
Trellchem VPS (Vapour Barrier Suit) TM––chloroprene rubber outside and a
polymer barrier laminate inside.
Trellchem SuperTM––VitonTM and butyl rubber outside and inside.
Trellchem ButylTM––butyl rubber outside and inside.
Trellchem LightTM ––polyvinyl chloride (PVC) outside and inside.
Trellchem TLU (Limited Use)TM ––polymer barrier laminate outside and inside.
Trellchem TLU-A TM––ensemble comprising an aluminized fiberglass fabric
over-cover and a Trellchem TLU suit.
TychemTM DuPont Offers protection against exposure to wide range of chemicals and is more tear-
and puncture-resistant than BarricadeTM material.
Viton TM DuPont Dow Series of synthetic fluororubbers, elastomers based on polymers made from
Elastomers hexafluoropropylene, and vinylidene fluoride or vinyl fluoride; other
fluorocarbons may be used in some VitonTM products.
ZetexTM Newtex Clothing products are woven from highly texturized silica yarns––an alternative
to asbestos for gloves, etc., for protection against heat, flames, and sparks.
38
6. PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT SELECTION FACTORS
Section 6 provides a discussion of 12 selection factors that are recommended for consideration
by the emergency first responder community when selecting and purchasing PPE (respiratory
and percutaneous). These factors were compiled by a panel of experienced scientists and
engineers who have multiple years of experience in PPE, domestic preparedness, and
identification of emergency first responder needs. The factors have also been shared with the
emergency first responder community in order to get their thoughts and comments.
It is anticipated that as additional input is received from the emergency first responder
community, additional factors may be added or existing factors may be modified. These factors
were developed so that PPE could be compared and contrasted in order to assist with the
selection and purchase of the most appropriate equipment. It is important to note that the
evaluation conducted using the 12 selection factors was based solely upon vendor-supplied data
and no independent evaluation of equipment was conducted in the development of this guide.
The vendor-supplied data can be found in its entirety in Volume IIa (respiratory), Volume IIb
(percutaneous––protective garments), and Volume IIc (percutaneous––other apparel).
In addition to the selection factor information, the agency certifying the system for use (i.e.,
OSHA, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), NFPA, etc.), if any, and
testing is also included as part of the evaluation table.
The results of the evaluation of the PPE against the 12 selection factors are provided in section 7
(respiratory), section 8 (percutaneous––protective garments), and section 9 (percutaneous––other
apparel), respectively. The remainder of this section defines each of the selection factors. Details
on the manner in which the selection factor was used to assess the equipment are presented in
table 6−1 (respiratory), table 6−2 (percutaneous––protective garments), and table 6−3
(percutaneous––other apparel).
6.1 Chemical Warfare (CW) Agents Protection
This factor describes the ability of the equipment to protect from chemical agents. Chemical
agents, when referred to in this guide, refer to nerve and blister agents only. Blood agents and
choking agents are included within the list of TIMs. Nerve agents primarily consist of GB and
VX. Other nerve agents include GA, GD, and GF. Blister agents are primarily limited to mustard
(H). The blister agents considered in this guide include HD, HN, and L.
6.2 Biological Warfare (BW) Agents Protection
This factor describes the ability of the equipment to protect from biological agents. Biological
agents considered for this guide include bacteria (i.e., Anthrax), rickettsia (i.e., Typhus), toxins
(i.e., Botulinum Toxin), and viruses (i.e., Q Fever).
39
6.3 Toxic Industrial Materials (TIMs) Protection
This factor describes the ability of the equipment to protect from TIMs. TIMs considered in the
development of this guide are discussed in section 3. Examples include ammonia, carbon
monoxide, hydrogen cyanide, phosgene, and mineral acids (i.e., hydrochloric acid, sulfuric acid,
nitric acid, etc.).
6.4 Duration of Protection
Duration of protection indicates the amount of time the equipment provides adequate protection.
Since duration varies depending on the concentration of agent, type of agent, and environmental
conditions, duration will be given with respect to specific conditions.
6.5 Environmental Conditions
This factor indicates whether the equipment is designed for use in all common outdoor weather
conditions and climates (e.g., rain, snow, extreme temperatures, and humidity) or only under
relatively controlled conditions.
6.6 Weight/Comfort
Weight/comfort is the total weight of the equipment/system and indicates how long the equipment
can be worn with no effects. This should be considered in conjunction with the dexterity/mobility
selection factor. Weight/comfort is considered for both respiratory protection and percutaneous
protection.
6.7 Dexterity/Mobility (Ease of Use)
Dexterity/mobility refers to the ease of use and comfort of an individual while wearing the
personal protective system. Ease of use, as well as donning and doffing information, is an
important consideration for this selection factor.
6.8 Sizes Available
Sizes available refers to the variety of sizes available to the first responder community. There
should be enough sizes to adequately fit most of the members of the response team, both male
and female.
One-size-fits-all may be attractive for certain items but may not serve the responder community that is
made up of diverse personnel. This selection factor is not considered for respiratory protection.
6.9 Visibility
Visibility indicates the percentage of unobstructed visibility the user has while wearing the
protective gear. This selection factor is appropriate for respiratory equipment, fully encapsulated
protective garments, and other protective apparel (hoods).
40
6.10 Launderability (Cleaning)
Launderability includes the laundering procedures that are safe for the item, including the
number of times it can be laundered or cleaned and remain effective. Also, launderability
includes any special procedures needed for specific components. This selection factor is
appropriate for respiratory equipment accessories (straps, harnesses), fully encapsulated
protective garments, and other protective apparel.
6.11 Training Requirements
Training requirements indicate the amount of instruction time required for the responder to become
proficient in the operation of the instrument. For example, higher-end equipment such as SCBA
and PAPR respirators require more in-depth training than an escape mask. Also, fully encapsulated
garments may require specific donning and doffing procedures.
Continuous training or periodic recertification in the use of the equipment is considered with this
selection factor.
6.12 Unit Cost
Unit cost is the cost of the PPE, including the cost of all support equipment and consumables. This
factor, in conjunction with other selection factors, can help decide if the equipment will be deemed
suitable for disposal after use, suitable for special uses only, or suitable for all uses.
41
Table 6-1. Selection factor key for personal protective equipment (respiratory)
August 2001
n n
io t io s
t ec
ec tion ts
ot ot di
Pr Pr n en
s s tio on ty m
nt nt n a C rt ili ) re
ge t io ur tal fo ty qui
ge D ob se li e
lA lA ec n en om /M U bi R
a ca ot io nm /C ity of ty ra g
ic gi Pr ct t r ili de in
em lo s te v iro gh te se b in t
h io M o ei ex (Ea si aun a os
C B TI Pr En W D Vi L Tr C
Protects against all Easily manageable, Able to be cleaned

Protects against all Protects against all Protects up to 2 h Protects in all able to be worn for Not limiting 90 % to 100 % Little to no training Less than or equal
nerve and blister and reused greater
biological agents TIMs listed environments long periods with no visibility required to $500 per unit
agents than 50 times
effects
Able to be cleaned
75 % to 90 % and reused 25 to 50
visibility times
42
Protects against Manageable, but Able to be cleaned Greater than $500
Protects against
Protects against Protects 30 min to Protects in normal unable to wear for Some loss of 50 % to 75 % Some training
some of the nerve some biological and reused 5 to 50 but less than $1000
multiple TIMs 90 min environments more than 1 h to 2 h mobility, range of visibility required, 4 h or
and blister agents agents times per unit
at a time motion more
Not intended for

reuse, but can be
hand cleaned to
remove dirt and
dust
Protects against Very heavy and Continuous training

Protects against no Protects against Greater than or
Protects less than Protects only in cumbersome, Very limiting Less than 50 % Unable to be required with
none of the blister equal to $1000
biological agents none of the 30 min specific unable to wear for visibility reused recertification every
or nerve agents per unit
TIMs listed environments prolonged periods few months
The blank cells designate that the symbol is not applicable for the selection factor.
A duplicate of this table is provided for quick reference as Table 7-10.
Table 6-2. Selection factor key for percutaneous protective (garments)
August 2001
n n
tio ctio s
t ec te ti on ts
o di
Pro Pr n en t)
s ts on y i gh
n n a tio rt i lit r em ) T )
nt io a lC e ui ht ls
ge ge t ur t fo ob e) bl ty g as r al
lA ec D en / M Us i la ili eq Ti G e
lA a n om y ab R
a ic ot tio nm t/C rit of va ty e r g as ot ov
ic Pr A ili n G N C
m log s t ec ro gh x te se
e s i b nd i ni t( t( t(
he io M o vi ei e a z s u a o s os os
C B TI Pr En W D (E Si Vi La Tr C C C
Easily Less than or

Able to be
Protects against Protects against manageable, Little to no Less than or Less than or equal to $75 for
Protects against Protects up to Protects in all At least 5 sizes 90 % to 100 % cleaned and
all nerve and all biological able to be worn Not limiting visibility training equal to $500 equal to $100 single unit or
all TIMs listed 2h environments available reused greater
blister agents agents for long periods required per unit per unit $150 for bulk
than 50 times
with no effects packaging
Able to be
75 % to 90 % cleaned and
visibility reused 25 to 50
times
Greater than
$75 (single unit)
Protects against Manageable, Able to be Greater than Greater than or $150 (bulk)
Protects against Protects in Some loss of Some training
some of the Protects against Protects 30 min but unable to At least 4 sizes 50 % to 75 % cleaned and $500 but less $100 but less but less than
some biological normal mobility, range required, 4 h or
nerve and multiple TIMs to 90 min wear for more available visibility reused 5 to 50 than $1000 per than $500 per $300 for single
agents environments of motion more
blister agents than 1 h to 2 h times unit unit
43
item or bulk
at a time packaging
Not intended for

reuse, but can
be hand cleaned
to remove dirt
and dust
Continuous
Very heavy and
Protects against training Greater than or
Protects against Protects only in cumbersome, Greater than or Greater than or
none of the Protects against Protects less Less than 50 % Unable to be required with equal to $300
no biological specific unable to wear Very limiting One size fits all equal to $1000 equal to $500
blister or nerve none of the than 30 min visibility reused recertification for single unit or
agents environments for prolonged per unit per unit
agents TIMs listed every few bulk packaging
periods
months
Table 6-3. Selection factor key for percutaneous protective equipment (apparel)
August 2001
n n
io io
ct ct ns ts
te o te n itio s en ts
o n)
Pr Pr tio nd ood a rm en tio rm
s ts t ec o H G em ec A
nt n n o C t lity e e r t d
ge tio Pr t al f or bi ) bl ity ui ) ro an )
ge A n m o se l a bl s
l a il eq ds P
A l tec of e o M i n i R ot d n) er
al ca o n y/ f U va ro va rab g oo o an tio th
ic Pr nm t/C A ty H F H c O
m gi tio ri o h t e rit e o
s
A Ap
s ili de in t( t( t ( te t(
lo s a v i g s e d e i b un in
he io M ur e ex a z z s a os os os ro os
C B TI D En W D (E Si an Si Vi La Tr C C C P C
Easily
manageable, Able to be Less than or Less than or
Protects Protects
Protects Many 90 % to cleaned and Little to no Less than or Less than or equal to $75 for equal to $75 for
against all against all Protects up to Protects in all able to be One size
against all Not limiting available 100 % reused training equal to $500 equal to $100 single unit or single unit or
nerve and biological 2h environments worn for long fits all
TIMs listed periods with sizes visibility greater required per unit per unit $150 for bulk $150 for bulk
blister agents agents
no effects than 50 times packaging packaging
Able to be
visibility reused 25 to
50 times
Greater than Greater than

Manageable, $75 (single $75 (single
Protects Able to be Some
Protects but unable to Some loss Greater than Greater than unit) or $150 unit) or $150
against some Protects Protects in Small, training
Protects 30 wear for of mobility, 50 % to 75 % cleaned and $500 but less $100 but less (bulk) but less (bulk) but less
of the nerve against some against normal medium, reused 5 to required, 4 h
biological min to 90 min more range visibility than $1000 than $500 per
44
and blister multiple TIMs and large than $300 for than $300 for
agents
environments than 1 h to
of motion 50 times or more per unit unit
agents single item or single item or
2 h at a time bulk packaging bulk packaging
Not intended
for reuse, but
can be hand
cleaned to
remove dirt
and dust
Very heavy Continuous

Protects and Greater than Greater than
Protects Protects Numerous training Greater than
against none Protects only cumbersome, Greater than or equal to or equal to
against no against none Protects less sizes, One size Less than Unable to be required with or equal to
of the blister in specific unable to Very or equal to $300 for single $300 for single
biological of the TIMs than 30 min requires fits all 50 % visibility reused recertification $1000
or nerve environments wear for limiting $500 per unit unit or bulk unit or bulk
agents listed fit test every few per unit
agents prolonged packaging packaging
months
periods
7. EVALUATION OF RESPIRATORY PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT
The market survey (refer to sec. 2.0 of Vol. IIa) conducted for CB agent and TIM personal
protective equipment identified 69 different respiratory protection items. The details of the
market survey, including data on each item, are provided in Volume IIa of this guide. This
section documents the results of evaluating each of the respiratory protection items versus the 12
selection factors provided in section 6 of this volume. Section 7.1 defines the types of respiratory
equipment and section 7.2 discusses the evaluation results.
7.1 Respiratory Protection
In order to display the evaluation results in a meaningful format, the respiratory protection
equipment were grouped into two primary categories (air purifying and atmosphere supplying)
and then further subcategorized by the mode of operation and type of fit of the equipment.
7.1.1 Air-Purifying Respirators
Air-purifying respirators contain a filter, cartridge, or canister that removes specific air
contaminants by passing air from the surrounding atmospheric through the air-purifying element.
Air purifying respirators may be nonpowered or powered.
• Masks are nonpowered and use the breathing action of the wearer to draw air through the
filter element.
• Powered air-purifying respirators (PAPRs) use blowers to force ambient atmosphere

through the air purifying elements.
7.1.2 Atmosphere-Supplying Respirators
Atmosphere-supplying respirators provide air from a source independent of the surrounding

atmosphere rather than removing contaminants from the atmosphere. Level A and Level B
configurations require atmosphere-supplying respirators that produce positive pressure within the
suit.
• A self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) gets air from a compressed cylinder, usually
through a half-mask.
• A rebreather is a closed circuit SCBA. The exhaled air is rebreathed after it has been passed
over a scrubber to remove carbon dioxide and restore oxygen.
• Airline respirators or supplied air respirators (SARs) use supplied-air that is connected by
a hose to a stationary source of compressed breathing air. Some respirators can be configured
as either a SCBA or a SAR.
45
7.1.3 Escape Masks
Escape masks are special purpose respiratory protection devices. They are for emergency use
only. They are designed to provide short duration respiratory protection, enabling the wearer to
escape from an area that has developed a respiratory hazard. These devices may be either air-
purifying or atmosphere-supplying respirators.
7.2 Evaluation Results
The evaluation results for the respiratory protective equipment are presented in tabular format for
the 69 pieces of equipment identified at the time this guide was written. A table is presented for
each of the identified categories. Each table includes the specific equipment and the symbol that
corresponds to how the equipment item was characterized based upon each of the selection factor
definitions. The acronym “TBD” is displayed in the appropriate cell if data were not available to
characterize a specific selection factor. The acronym “NA” is displayed in the appropriate cell if
the data were not applicable for a piece of equipment. The results of categorizing the
percutaneous protective garments are presented in table 7−1.
Table 7−1. Respiratory protection equipment
Respiratory Respiratory Protective Equipment

Equipment Air Purifying Supplied Air Total
Mask 29 29
PAPR 12 12
SCBA 10 10
SCBA/Rebreather 3 3
Airline 5 5
SCBA/Airline 3 3
Escape Mask 3 4 7
Total 44 25 69
Table 7-2 provides the table number and associated table pages for each of the usage categories.
Table 7−2. Evaluation results reference table
Table Name Table Number Page(s)

Respiratory protection (masks) 7−3 48−50
Respiratory protection (PAPR) 7−4 51−52
Respiratory protection (SCBA) 7−5 53
Respiratory protection (SCBA/rebreather) 7−6 54
Respiratory protection (airline respirator) 7−7 55
Respiratory protection (SCBA/airline 7−8 56
respirator)
Respiratory protection (escape masks) 7−9 57
Selection factor key for personal protection 7−10 58
equipment (respiratory)
46
7.2.1 Air-Purifying Respirators
There were 44 air-purifying respirators identified in the development of this guide. These
respirators were further divided into two subcategories, nonpowered masks and PAPRs. There
were 29 nonpowered masks and 12 PAPRs. Three devices fall into the categories of escape
masks. Table 7−3 and table 7−4 detail the evaluation results for these two air-purifying respirator
subcategories, respectively.
7.2.2 Atmosphere-Supplying Respirators
There were 25 atmosphere-supplying respirators identified in the development of this guide.

These atmosphere-supplying respirators were further divided into subcategories identifying the
air supply (self contained and stationary source). The major atmosphere-supplying respirator
category was the SCBA. There were 16 respirators identified as SCBA and five respirators with
stationary air supply. The 16 SCBAs were further divided into SCBA (ten items), SCBA/
rebreather (three items), and SCBA/airline (three items). Table 7−5, table 7−6, table 7−7, and
table 7−8 detail the evaluation results for SCBA, SCBA/rebreather, airline, and SCBA/airline,
respectively.
7.2.3 Escape Masks
There were seven escape masks included in this guide, three air-purifying respirators, and four
atmosphere-supplying respirators. Table 7−9 details the evaluation results for this category.
47
Table 7-3. Respiratory protection (masks)
August 2001
n n
ns* tio ctio s
tio ec te tion ts
la ot ro di en
u Pr P n
e eg s ts tio on ty em
R nt ra lC t r
am / e g en i on u t a f or bili ) ty ui
ns g c t D o se ili
tN lA n en om b eq
en tio a lA a o te o m C y /M f U
y r a R
m ca ic ic t i n t/ g
Pr rit o lit de in
ip tifi e m l og s t ec iro i gh ibi n in t
# u er h io M o v e e x te ase
s u a os
ID Eq C C B TI Pr En W D (E Vi La Tr C
1 Avon CT12 Special Forces NIOSH, OSHA
Respirator
TBD TBD
2 NBC FM12 Respirator NIOSH, OSHA
TBD TBD
3 NBC SF10 Respirator NIOSH, OSHA
TBD TBD
16 BG-4 w/Mask NIOSH/MSHA
TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
18 Panorama Nova Full Facepiece NIOSH, NFPA, OSHA
TBD
48
20 Kareta M Mask NIOSH
TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
25 M40 Series Gas Mask AR 70-71; Canister Mount—
NATO Standard
TBD TBD TBD TBD
26 M42 Series Gas Mask AR 70-71; Canister Mount—
NATO Standard
TBD TBD TBD TBD
30 INTERSPIRO Respirator TBD
31 C4 Gas Mask Canadian Department of
National Defense
TBD
34 Magnum 4000 P3, with Full TBD
Facemask
NA NA
‘NA’ - the specific selection factor is not applicable for the piece of equipment.
‘TBD’ (to be determined) - there is currently no data available to support that selection factor.
See Table 7-10 for selection factor definitions.
* See Appendix B, References, number eight.
Table 7-3. Respiratory protection (masks)-Continued
August 2001
* n n
tio io s
ns c ect on
a tio o te ot ti ts
l Pr di en
gu Pr s i on on y m
e e s nt at re
/R nt n lC rt lit
am ge io ur a fo bi e) ty ui
tN ns ge ct D nt o s ili eq
A lA te n e om /M U R
en tio al ca io m /C y r ab
m ca ic i P ro c t n t r ity of
lit ng
p m og s e iro gh bi de ni t
# ui tifi e l o t v i x te ase i un a i
er h io M e e s os
53 3M™ 6000 Series Full OSHA 1910.134, NIOSH-
Facepiece Respirators approved when used with AEP3
cartridge (4240-01-323-3530)
TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
54 3M™ 6000 Series Full OSHA 1910.134, NIOSH-
Facepiece Respirator approved when used with AEP3 TBD TBD TBD
cartridge (4240-01-323-3530)
55 3M™ 7800S-BA Full Facepiece TBD

Respirators TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
60 3M™ Full Facepiece FR-M40, NIOSH

Military-Style Cartridge manufactured in
accordance with U.S. MIL- TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
C51560 (EA) and EA-C-1704
63 PAN1 Dual Cartridge Full Face NIOSH
49
Respirator TBD
64 PAN2 Single Filter Canister EN-136 Approved Respirator
TBD
65 Model 4A1 NBC Respirator TBD
TBD TBD
66 M15-A30 NBC Respirator NIOSH
TBD TBD
Table 7-3. Respiratory protection (masks)-Continued
August 2001
n n
ns* t io ctio ns
tio tec ote i tio ts
a ro en
ul P Pr n nd
e eg s ts tio o ty em
nt ra lC t r
am s/R e g en i on u t a f or bili ) ty ui
N g c t D o se ili
t i on lA n en om eq
en t a lA a o te o m C y /M f U
r ab R
m ca ic ic ti n / it o ty g
i p m og Pr ec ro ht ili de in t
# u tifi e l s t v i i g t er se ib un in
er h io M o e ex a s a os
Facemask
NA NA
Facemask
NA NA
Facemask
NA NA
39 M95 Respirator NBC Protective TBD
Respirator
TBD TBD
40 MSA Advantage 1000 CBA/RCA NIOSH/MSHA no. TC-14G-0235

Full-Face Respirator
50
41 MSA Advantage 1000 with GME- NIOSH-approved for all
P100 cartridges industrial chemicals
42 MSA Millennium Chemical- NIOSH evaluating

Biological Mask
TBD
45 MSA Phalanx CBA/RCA Gas NIOSH No. TC-14G-0236
Mask
48 MSA Ultra-Twin® Respirators TBD

TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
49 MSA MCU-2/P and MCU-2A/P TBD
Series
TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
Table 7-4. Respiratory protection (PAPR)
August 2001
* n n
s tio t io s
ion ec tec tion
at ot ro ts
ul P n di en
Pr s on y m
e eg s nt a tio re
/ R nt n lC rt lit
am ge io ur a fo bi e) ty qui
tN ns ge A ct D nt o s ili e
io A te n e om /M U R
en at al al /C y ab
c ic ic P ro c tio nm t r ity of lit er ng
pm fi m o g e ir o ni t
# ui ti e l s t v i gh x te ase ibi und i
er h io M o e e s a os
12 Sabre Tornado® Respiratory NIOSH regulations 42 CFR 84
System (PAPR)
22 PP Mask with ABP3/US canister Positive pressure: NIOSH-approved
(French version EN-approved)
Negative pressure: EN-approved in
French version
23 PAPR system NIOSH-approved (French version
EN-approved)
43 MSA OptimAir® MM 2K PAPR NIOSH approval varies depending

on facepiece or hood style
44 MSA OptimAir® 6A PAPR with NIOSH and MSHA

CBA/RCA OptiFilter Cartridges
51
51 3M™ Breathe Easy™ 7 NIOSH, OSHA 1910.134, NIOSH-
RRPAS™ Respirator approved for certain chemicals and as
high efficiency filter when used with TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
AEP3 cartridge (4240-01-323-3530)
52 3M™ Breathe Easy™ Powered OSHA 1910.134, NIOSH-approved
Air Purifying Respirator System for certain chemicals when used
with AEP3 cartridge TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
57 3M™ Belt-Mounted PAPR TBD
TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
Table 7-4. Respiratory protection (PAPR)-Continued
August 2001
* n n
s tio t io s
i on t ec t ec tion
t o ts
ula ro Pr n di en
P s on y
e eg s nt atio C r em
/R nt n rt lit
am s ge t io ur tal fo bi e) ty ui
tN n ge A D o s ili eq
tio lA al ec n en om /M U ab R
en a c ot io nm t/C ity of ty er
m ca ic gi Pr ct h r ili ng
p ifi o s e ro g ib nd ni t
# ui e rt h em i ol M ot vi ei e x te ase
s u ai os
58 3M™ GVP Belt-Mounted OSHA 1910.134, NIOSH-
Powered Air Purifying approved for certain organic
Respirator vapors, acid gases and as a
high efficiency filter when used
with the GVP-443 cartridge
(4240-01-394-6336)
62 Scott C420 Variflo™ PAPR NFPA, OSHA, NIOSH, DOJ

Foundation
67 SE400 Fan Supplied, Positive NIOSH, CE

Pressure Respirator (FPBR)
NA
69 Survivair™ Belt Mounted NIOSH Approval No. TC-23C-
PAPR 1053; ANSI/UL 913 standard
for use in Class 1, Division 1, TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
52
Groups A, B, C, and D hazards
Table 7-5. Respiratory protection (SCBA)
August 2001
* n n
s tio ctio s
ti on tec te tion ts
la o di
u Pro Pr n en
e eg s ts tio on y em
nt n n a C rt lit r
am s/R ge io ur tal fo ty ui
ge t D obi e)
s ili
tN i on lA ec n en om /M U eq
en t a lA ot ab R
m ca ic ca io nm t/C ity of ty er
p gi Pr ct ro h r e ili ng
ifi em o s e g ib nd ni t
# ui e rt h i ol M ot vi ei e x te as
s u ai os
4 Avon NBC-SCBA-Option NIOSH, OSHA
TBD TBD TBD
5 NBC CoolAir SCBA TBD
TBD TBD
6 SuperCritical Air Mobility Pack TBD
(SCAMP®) Self Contained
Breathing Apparatus (SCBA) TBD TBD TBD
14 AirBoss PSS100 with Flashing NIOSH, MSHA, NFPA 1981/1997
Gauge or with Sentine l edition, IPASS II or Sentinel compliant
to NFPA 1982/1998 edition TBD
15 AirBoss Evolution with Flashing NIOSH, MSHA, NFPA 1981/1997
Gauge or with Sentinel edition, IPASS II or Sentinel compliant
to NFPA 1982/1998 edition TBD
53
17 ProAir Evolution NIOSH
28 Viking Digital SCBA NIOSH-approved
50 MSA MMR Xtreme® Air Mask ANSI/NFPA-1981 Standard for Open-

circuit SCBA, 1997 Edition, NIOSH
TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
56 3M™ SCBAG Self-Contained OSHA 1910.134, NIOSH-approved in
Breathing Apparatus several configurations
TBD TBD
68 Survivair™ Cougar SCBA TBD
TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
Table 7-6. Respiratory protection (SCBA/rebreather)
August 2001
n n
ns* tio ctio ns
tio tec ote itio ts
a ro en
ul P Pr n nd
e eg s ts tio o ty em
nt ra lC t r
am s/R e g en i on u t a f or bili ) ty ui
n g t D o se ili
tN A lA ec n en om M eq
en tio al ot m r ab R
m ca ic i ca r t io n t /C it y/ of U ty g
p m o g P e c ro h ili de in t
# ui tifi l s t v i i g t er se ib un in
er he io M o e ex a s a os
7 Biomarine BioPak 60 Rebreather NIOSH/MSHA Certification
TC-13F-371 and TC-13F-372
TBD TBD NA
8 Biomarine BioPak 240 Rebreather NIOSH/MSHA Certification

TC-13F-185 and TC-13F-206
TBD NA
32 Litpac II-Rebreather NIOSH/MSHA #TC-13F-233; DOT

regulations for transporting full cylinders
54
Table 7-7. Respiratory protection (airline respirator)
August 2001
n n
* t io ctio s
ns tec te tion ts
io o di
e at P ro Pr n en
ul s ts tio on ty m
am eg nt ra lC t ire
N R e g en i on u t a for b ili ) y u
t n/ g A c t D o se lit
io n en om bi eq
en a lA al o te o m C y/M f U
y ra R t
m c at ic c r i n t / t o e os
p i gi P ct ri lit d i ng C
# ui tif e m lo s te v iro i gh x te ase i bi in t
er h i o M o e e s un ra ni
ID Eq C C B TI Pr En W D (E Vi La T U
9 Bullard CC20 Series Airline MSHA/NIOSH, ASTM F739
Respirator
TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
11 Sabre Tornado® Respiratory System TBD

(Airline)
27 ARAP/C and ARAP/E Airline NIOSH-approved Type C

Respirators respirators
TBD TBD TBD
33 Easiflow Plus Full Facemask TBD

Respirator and Filters
NA NA
55
38 9 mtr Unpowered Fresh-Air Hose TBD
System
NA NA
'NA' - the specific selection factor is not applicable for the piece of equipment.
'TBD' (to be determined) - there is currently no data available to support that selection factor.
Table 7-8. Respiratory protection (SCBA/airline respirator)
August 2001
n n
ns* t io c tio s
tio ec te tion
ot ro ts
u la P n di en
e Pr on
eg s n ts n a tio C ity r em
am / R nt al rt il )
N ge ge tio ur t fo ty ui
ns A ec D en ob se ili eq
nt tio l lA
a t n om / M a b R
e a ic ro tio nm y fU ty r g
m ca ic g P c o h t/C ili de in
p tifi m l o s t e i r g t e rit e o
s b n t
# ui e M o v e i s i u a in
Eq er h io ex a os
ID C C B TI Pr En W D (E Vi La Tr C
46 MSA PremAire XV Supplied Air NIOSH/MSHA for entry and
Respirator escape from IDLH atmospheres
TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
47 MSA RescueAire II Portable Air- NIOSH/MSHA for entry and

Supply System escape from IDLH atmospheres
61 Scott AV 2000 AV-2000® TBD

Facepiece
56
Table 7-9. Respiratory protection (escape masks)
August 2001
* n n
s t io c tio s
la o di
u Pro Pr n en
e eg s ts tio on y em
R nt n n a C lit
rt r
am / ge io ur tal fo ty ui
ns ge t D obi e)
s ili
tN A lA ec n en om /M U eq
en tio al a t ab R
m i ca ic ic P ro c tio nm t/C r ity of ty er ng
p m g ir o h e ili ni t
# ui tif e lo s te v ig x t ase ib und
er h i o M o e e s ai os
10 Bullard Spectrum-PDE Pressure TBD
Demand Respirator with ESCBA
13 SR-100, 60 Minute ESCBA NIOSH/MSHA certification (TC-

13F-239). Meets CFR 30, part 75-
1714 and CFR 29, 1910,146 TBD TBD TBD
Appendix E.
19 Defend Air TBD
21 Duram Emergency Escape TBD

Respirator
TBD TBD
24 EVATOX Adult Escape Hood US EN-approved (French version EN-
57
approved)
29 Interspiro Spiroscape CE or NIOSH certification

Escape BA
59 3M™ Escort Combination OSHA 1910.134, NIOSH-

ESCBA/Supplied Air Respirator approved in several
configurations TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
Table 7-10. Selection factor key for personal protective equipment (respiratory)
August 2001
n n
tio io s
ct on
ec te ti ts
ot ro di en
Pr P n
s ts tio on em
nt n n a C rt ity
il ) r
ge ge tio ur tal fo ty ui
A D ob e ili eq
lA ec n en om / M Us a b R
al ica ot io nm /C y f ty r g
ic Pr ct t rit o li de in
em l og s te viro gh x bi n in t
h io M o ei e
te ase
si u a os
C B TI Pr En W D (E Vi La Tr C
Protects against all Easily manageable, Able to be cleaned

Protects against all Protects against all Protects up to 2 h Protects in all able to be worn for Not limiting 90 % to 100 % Little to no training Less than or equal
nerve and blister and reused greater
biological agents TIMs listed environments long periods with no visibility required to $500 per unit
agents than 50 times
effects
Able to be cleaned
75 % to 90 %
and reused 25 to 50
visibility
times
Protects against Protects against Manageable, but Some loss of Able to be cleaned Greater than $500
Protects against Protects 30 min to Protects in normal 50 % to 75 % Some training
some of the nerve some biological unable to wear for mobility, range of and reused 5 to 50 but less than $1000
multiple TIMs 90 min environments visibility required, 4 h or
58
and blister agents agents more than 1 h to 2 h motion times per unit
at a time more
Not intended for

reuse, but can be
hand cleaned to
remove dirt and
dust
Protects against Protects only in Very heavy and Continuous training Greater than or
Protects against no Protects against Protects less than cumbersome, Very limiting Less than 50 % Unable to be required with
none of the blister specific equal to $1000 per
biological agents none of the 30 min unable to wear for visibility reused
or nerve agents environments recertification every unit
TIMs listed prolonged periods few months
8. EVALUATION OF PERCUTANEOUS PROTECTION (GARMENTS)
The market survey (refer to sec. 2.0 of Vol. IIb) conducted for CB agent and TIM personal
protective equipment identified 180 different protective garments. The details of the market
survey, including data on each item, are provided in Volume IIb of this guide. This section
documents the results of evaluating each percutaneous protective garment versus the 12 selection
factors provided in section 6 of this volume. Section 8.1 defines the levels of protection of the
garments and section 8.2 discusses the evaluation results.
8.1 Levels of Protection
In order to display the evaluation results in a meaningful format, the percutaneous protective
garments were grouped into the EPA levels of protection as well as on configuration of the
garments. The garments in this section are identified as EPA Level A encapsulated suits and
ensembles, EPA Level B encapsulated suits, coveralls, garments, and ensembles with level of
protection not provided.
• EPA Level A garments are gas-tight. They provide a protective barrier that completely covers
the wearer and their respirators.
• EPA Level B garments are liquid splash-protective. They are available as nongas-tight
encapsulating suits, coveralls, or two-piece overgarments. The material is impermeable and
offers splash protection but not continuous liquid contact or vapor protection. For those
preferring additional protection for their respiratory equipment, EPA Level B encapsulated
suits are available. These suits cannot be substituted for EPA Level A suits however, because
the seams and zippers are not gas tight.
• There are other protective suits and garments, made of traditional textiles that allow vapors
and liquids to pass through. They do not offer protection against highly toxic CB and TIMs.
This category includes several EPA Level C garments and other garments that have no
protective level designation.
The evaluation results for the percutaneous protective garments are presented in tabular format
for the 180 pieces of equipment identified at the time this guide was written. A table is presented
for each of the identified categories. Each table includes the specific equipment and the symbol
that corresponds to how the equipment item was characterized based upon each of the selection
factor definitions. The acronym “TBD” is displayed in the appropriate cell if data were not
available to characterize a specific selection factor. The acronym “NA” is displayed in the
appropriate cell if the data were not applicable for a piece of equipment. The results of
categorizing the percutaneous protective garments are presented in table 8−1.
59
Table 8−1. Percutaneous protective garments
Percutaneous Protective Garments

Encapsulating Ensembles Coveralls Overgarments Total
EPA Level A 43 4 47
EPA Level B 29 89 118
Other 6 9 15
Total 72 10 89 9 180
Table 8−2 provides the table number and associated table pages for each of the usage categories.
Table 8−2. Evaluation results reference table

Percutaneous protection (EPA Level A 8−3 61−65
encapsulating)
Percutaneous protection (EPA Level A 8−4 66
ensembles)
Percutaneous protection (EPA Level B 8−5 67−70
encapsulating)
Percutaneous protection (coveralls) 8−6 71−79
Percutaneous protection (ensembles) 8−7 80
Percutaneous protection (overgarments) 8−8 81
Selection factor key for percutaneous 8−9 82
protection (garments)
Table 8−3 and table 8−4 detail the evaluation results for the EPA Level A encapsulated and
ensembles.
Tables 8−5 and 8−6 detail the evaluation results for EPA Level B encapsulating and coveralls.
Tables 8−7 and 8−8 detail the evaluation for other percutaneous protection ensembles and
overgarments.
60
Table 8-3. Percutaneous protection (EPA Level A encapsulating)
August 2001
n n
ns* t io c tio s
tio tec te tion ts
o n
la ro Pr tio di en
gu P on y
e s nts t ec C r em
R nt n ro rt lit e
s/ ge ge t io P tal fo bi e) bl ty ui
n o s la ili eq
ti o lA lA ec of en om /M U i R t
a a ca ot n va r ab
ic ic Pr io nm t/C ity of A ty ng os
e o gi t ro t s ili de ni
# tif em s ra vi i gh er se
e ib un tC
am er h i ol M u e ex a z s ai ni
ID N C C B TI D En W D (E Si Vi La Tr U
1 STEPO Chemical Protective Suit Type Classified by U.S. Army,
(Totally encapsulating) 1997
2 Tychem® 10000 Commander NA

Level A Fully Encapsulating Suit


61
6 Tychem® 10000 EX NA
Commander Level A Fully
Encapsulating Suit
Encapsulating Suit
Encapsulating Suit
Encapsulating Suit
Table 8-3. Percutaneous protection (EPA Level A encapsulating)-Continued
August 2001
* n n
tio io s
ns c ect on
a tio o te ot ti ts
l Pr ti on di en
gu Pr s on y m
e s nt ec re
/R nt n rot lC rt lit e
ge ge io a fo bi e) bl ty ui
ns A ct fP nt m o ili eq
tio l lA t e o e o /M Us a ila R t
a a o n y f v y r ab
e i ca ic ic Pr io nm t/C rit o A lit ng os
m og s at iro gh s bi de ni
# am tif e l r v i x te ase e i un a i tC
N er h io M u e e z s ni
ID C C B TI D En W D (E Si Vi La Tr U
62 Kappler Responder® CSM Each Government has
OSHA Level A developed its own internal
guidance for storage and use TBD TBD TBD TBD
66 Lakeland Tychem® 10000 OSHA Level A, ASTM F1052

Economy Level A
Encapsulated Suit TBD

Economy Level A
Encapsulated Suit TBD

Level A Suit
TBD
62
79 Trellchem® High Performance NFPA 1991/2000 (USA), EN9
Suit (HPS) Level A (European); ASTM F739
80 Trellchem® TLU (Limited Use) NFPA 1991/2000 (USA), EN943

Level A (European)
TBD TBD
81 Trellchem® Vapor Barrier Suit NFPA 1991/2000 (USA), EN943

(VPI) Level A (European), ASTM F739
TBD TBD
82 Trellchem® Vapor Barrier Suit NFPA 1991/2000 (USA), EN943

(VPS) Level A (European), ASTM F739
TBD TBD
August 2001
* n n
s tio c tio s
ti on t ec te tion ts
o n
ula ro Pr tio di en
P on y
eg s nts t ec C r em
/ R nt n ro rt lit e
ge ge t io P tal fo bi e) bl ty ui
ns o s la ili eq
tio lA lA ec of en om /M U i R t
a a ca ot n va ab
ic ic Pr io nm t/C ity of A ty er ng os
e o gi t ro t s ili ni
# rtif em s ra vi i gh x
er se
a e ib und tC
am e h i ol M u e e z s ai ni
47 Chemturion® Suit: Model 35 Not applicable for reusable
Level A Laboratory Suit, Level A suits
Reusable TBD TBD TBD
48 Chemturion® Suit: Ready 1 None

Model 91 Level A Limited Use
Chemical Protective Suit TBD

Level A Total Encapsulating Level A suits
Suit, Reusable TBD TBD TBD
50 Kappler Responder® Total OSHA 1910.132 and OSHA

Encapsulating Level A (Gas- 1910.120
tight) Suit TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
63
Encapsulating Level A Suit 1910.120
TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
52 Kappler Total Encapsulating OSHA 1910.132 and OSHA

Level A Suit 1910.120
NA TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
53 Kappler Responder® Plus OSHA 1910.132 and OSHA

Total Encapsulating Level A 1910.120
Suit NA TBD TBD
54 Kappler Responder® Total NFPA 1991, 2000 Edition (to

Encapsulating Level A Suit, comply with NFPA 1991
NFPA 1991 (Vapor Protective) certification, must be worn with
aluminized overcover), OSHA NA TBD TBD TBD TBD
1910.132, OSHA 1910.120
August 2001
n n
s* tio io s
n c ect on
tio o te ot ti ts
la Pr tion di en
u Pr s c on
eg ts nt n te C t ty r em
/ R n io ro al or bili ) e ui
ge ge t P t f bl ty
ns A A e c f e n m M
o se
ila ili eq
tio l a l t o o / U a a b R t
a ic o n nm y f v y r g
e i ca ic Pr io t/C rit o A lit de in os
tif e m l og s r at iro i gh e s ibi n in tC
# am er h io M u v e e x te ase
z s u a ni
19 Tychem® TK Commander Will meet the requirements of
Level A Fully Encapsulating NFPA 1992 - 2000 edition
Suit

Suit

Suit
23 Tychem® TK EX Commander Will meet the requirements of

Suit
64
Suit

Suit

Suit
43 Disposable Toxicological Agent ASTM F 1359-97; NFPA 1991,

Protective Suit (DTAP)/Level A ASTM D3786, ASTM D5034,
ASTM D1117; will be NFPA
1994 certified

Level A (SCBA), Reusable Level A suits
TBD TBD
August 2001
n n
s* tio io s
n c ect on
tio o te ot ti ts
la Pr tion di en
u Pr s c on
eg ts nt n te C t ty r em
/ R n io ro al or bili ) e ui
ge ge t P t f bl ty
o se
ila ili eq
tio l a l t o o / U a a b R t
a ic o n nm y f v y r g
e i ca ic Pr io t/C rit o A lit de in os
z s u a ni
10 Tychem® BR Commander Will meet the requirements of
Suit

Suit

Suit

Suit
65
14 Tychem® BR EX Commander Will meet the requirements of
Suit

Suit

Suit

Suit

Suit
Table 8-4. Percutaneous protection (EPA Level A ensembles)
August 2001
* n n
s tio t io s
ion ec tec tion
at ot ro on ts
ul P ti di en
Pr s on y m
eg s nt ec re
s ge ge io a fo bi e) bl ty qui
n A ct fP nt m o ili e
io l lA t e o e o /M Us a ila R t
at a a o n y f v y ab
e c ic ic Pr io nm t/C rit o A lit er ng os
t ifi e m l og s r at iro i gh e s ibi nd ini tC
z s u a ni
22 Tychem® TK EX Commander NFPA 1991-2000 certified
Brigade Level A Ensemble
64 Lakeland Tychem® 10000 NFPA NFPA 1991-2000 edition, ASTM F1052

Certified Level A Ensemble
TBD
65 Lakeland Tychem® 10000 NFPA 1991-2000 edition,

Level A Ensemble ASTM F1052
TBD TBD
145 Kappler Ensemble, NFPA 1991, 2000

EPA Level A
TBD NA TBD
66
Table 8-5. Percutaneous protection (EPA Level B encapsulating)
August 2001
* n n
s tio c tio s
tion tec te tion ts
o n
u la ro Pr tio di en
P on y
eg s n ts ec C r em
/R nt n rot rt lit le
s ge ge t io tal fo bi e) ty ui
fP o s lab ili eq
ion lA lA ec o en om /M U i R t
at a ca ot n va ab
ic Pr io nm t/C ity of A ty er ng os
e fic o gi t ro t s ili ni
# ti em s ra vi i gh x
er se
a e ib und tC
am er h i ol M u e e z s ai ni
27 Tychem® 10000 Level B Fully NA
Encapsulating Suit
28 Tychem® 10000 Level B Fully NA

Encapsulating Suit
29 Tychem® 10000 Deluxe Level B NA

Fully Encapsulating Suit
30 Tyvek® Level B Fully NA

Encapsulating Suit
NA TBD TBD
31 Tychem® QC Level B Fully NA
Encapsulating Suit
TBD
67
32 Tychem® SL Utility Level B NA
Encapsulating Suit
33 Tychem® SL Utility Level B NA

Encapsulating Suit
34 Tychem® SL Level B Fully NA

Encapsulating Suit
35 Tychem® SL Level B Fully NA

Encapsulating Suit
36 Tychem® QC Level B Fully NA

Encapsulating Suit
TBD
Table 8-5. Percutaneous protection (EPA Level B encapsulating)-Continued
August 2001
n n
s* io t io s
t
i on ec t ec on
t t o ti ts
la ro Pr ti on di en
gu P s on y m
e s nt ec C re
/R nt n rot rt lit le y
ge ge tio tal fo bi e) qui
ns A fP m o s i l ab i lit e
tio lA ec o en o / M U ab R t
a al i ca ot n nm t/C ity of va ty er os
e ic ic Pr io A ili d i ng C
tif og s at ro i gh t er se
es ib n i n t
# am er h em i ol M ur vi e e x a z s u a ni
37 Tychem® BR Level B Fully NA
Encapsulating Suit
38 Tychem® BR Level B Fully NA

Encapsulating Suit
39 Tychem® BR Deluxe Level B NA

40 Tychem® TK Level B Fully NA

Encapsulating Suit
41 Tychem® TK Level B Fully NA
68
Encapsulating Suit
42 Tychem® TK Deluxe Level B NA

44 Disposable Toxicological Agent ASTM F 1359-97; NFPA 1991,

Protective Suit (DTAP)/Level B ASTM D3786, ASTM D5034,
ASTM D1117; will be NFPA
1994 certified
56 Kappler Total Encapsulating OSHA 1910.132 and OSHA

Level B Suit 1910.120
NA TBD TBD TBD TBD
57 Kappler CPF 3 Total OSHA 1910.132 and OSHA

Encapsulating Level B Suit 1910.120
NA TBD TBD TBD
August 2001
n n
s* io t io s
t
on ec tec on
ti ot ro ti ts
la P ti on di en
gu Pr s on y m
e s nt ec re
/R nt n r ot lC rt lit le
s ge ge io a fo bi e) ty qui
n A A ct fP nt m o s ilab ili e
io l e o e o M ab R t
at al ca ot n m /C y/ f U va y
e c ic gi Pr io on ht A lit er ng os
tifi m l o s a t i r g t e rit e o
s s bi nd ni
# am e o M r v e i x a z e s i u ai tC
N er h i u e ni
ID C C B TI D En W D (E Si Vi La Tr U
Encapsulating Level B (Liquid 1910.120
Protective) Suit TBD TBD
NA TBD TBD TBD

NA TBD TBD

NA TBD TBD
61 Kappler Responder® Total None

Encapsulating Level B Suit
(liquid protective) NA TBD TBD TBD TBD
69
63 Kappler Responder® CS Each Government has
OSHA Level B developed its own internal
guidance for storage and use TBD TBD TBD TBD
69 Lakeland Tychem® 9400 Level NA

B Encapsulated Suit
TBD TBD

B Encapsulated Suit
TBD TBD
71 Lakeland Tychem® SL Level B NA

Encapsulated Suit
TBD TBD
72 Lakeland Tychem® 10000 NA

Level B Encapsulated Suit
TBD
August 2001
n n
s * io tio s
t c
o n
P on y
/R nt n ro rt lit e
s ge ge t io P tal fo bi e) bl ty ui
m o s ila ili eq
i on lA lA ec of en o /M U ab R t
at a ca ot n nm /C ity of va ty er
e ic ic gi Pr tio ht A ili ng os
tif o s i ro i g t er se
e s ib nd ni tC
# am er h em i ol M u ra v e e x a z s u ai ni
B Coverall
TBD
70
Table 8-6. Percutaneous protection (coveralls)
August 2001
n n
ns* t io ctio s
tio tec te tion ts
o n
ula ro Pr tio di en
P on
eg s ts ec ty r em
/ R nt en on r ot a lC o rt ili ) e ui
g e g t i t f b bl ty
ns A A e c fP e n m M
o se
ila ili eq
tio l o o / U ab R t
al ca ot n nm /C ity of va ty r os
e ca ic gi Pr tio ht A ili de ng
ifi m l o s a i ro i g t er se
e s ib n ni tC
# am e rt he io M ur v e ex a z s u ai ni
87 CCA_DuPont Tyvek® F CE Certification
Coverall TBD NA NA
88 Tychem® 10000 Coverall NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
71
NA
NA
95 Tyvek® Coverall NA
NA TBD TBD NA
NA TBD TBD NA
NA TBD TBD NA
NA TBD TBD NA
Table 8-6. Percutaneous protection (coveralls)-Continued
August 2001
n n
ns* tio ctio s
tio ec te tion ts
la ot ro on di en
u Pr P cti
eg s ts te on ty em
nt lC t e r
s/R e g en i on ro t a f or bili )
bl ty ui
g A c t f P n o se ili
on A l e o e o m /M U ila b eq
ti a l a o t y f v a y r a R t
ca ic n nm t/C A g os
e i ic Pr io rit o lit de in
z s u a ni
NA TBD TBD NA
100 Tychem® QC Coverall NA
TBD NA
TBD NA
TBD NA
TBD NA
TBD NA
72
TBD NA
TBD NA
TBD NA
TBD NA
August 2001
n n
ns* t io ctio s
tio tec te tion ts
o n
ula ro Pr tio di en
P on
eg s ts ec ty r em
/ R nt en on r ot a lC o rt ili ) e ui
g e g t i t f b bl ty
ns A A e c fP e n m M
o se
ila ili eq
tio l o o / U ab R t
al ca ot n nm /C ity of va ty r os
e ca ic gi Pr tio ht A ili de ng
ifi m l o s a i ro i g t er se
e s ib n ni tC
# am e rt he io M ur v e ex a z s u ai ni
TBD NA
110 Tychem® SL Coverall NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
73
NA
NA
NA
NA
August 2001
n n
ns* tio ctio s
tio ec te tion ts
la ot ro on di en
u Pr P cti
eg s ts te on ty em
nt lC t e r
s/R e g en i on ro t a f or bili )
bl ty ui
g A c t f P n o se ili
on A l e o e o m /M U ila b eq
ti a l a o t y f v a y r a R t
ca ic n nm t/C A g os
e i ic Pr io rit o lit de in
z s u a ni
NA
TBD TBD NA
TBD TBD NA
TBD TBD NA
TBD TBD NA
TBD TBD NA
74
125 Tychem® BR Coverall NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
August 2001
* n n
s tio t io s
on tec t ec tion
ti o on ts
ula ro Pr ti di en
P s on y m
eg s nt ec C re
/R nt n rot rt lit le y
s ge ge io tal fo bi e) qui
n A ct fP m o s lab lit e
tio lA e o en o M i bi R t
al ca ot n /C y/ f U va a
ca ic i Pr io nm A ty er ng os
e ifi og t ro g ht t e rit e o
s ili nd ni
# r t em s ra vi x a s e ib u tC
am e h i ol M u ei e z s ai ni
NA
NA
NA
132 Tychem® TK Coverall NA
NA
NA
NA
75
NA
NA
NA
NA
August 2001
n n
s * io tio s
t c on
tion ec te ti ts
la ot Pro ti on di
u Pr en
s ts ec
t on ty
eg n lC rt e r em
/ R e nt en i o ro a o bili ) ty ui
g g P n t f bl ili
ns A l A e ct o f e m M
o se
ila b eq
io a o / U a a R t
at al ic ot n nm /C ity of v ty r
e ic ic Pr tio ht A ili de ng os
tif m l og s a i ro g t er se
e s n ni tC
# am e i o M u r n v e i e x a iz s ib u ai
ID N er h B D E D (E S La ni
C C TI W Vi Tr U
139 Kappler Coverall OSHA 1910.132 and OSHA
1910.120
NA TBD TBD TBD NA TBD TBD
140 Kappler Coverall OSHA 1910.132 and OSHA

1910.120
141 Kappler CPF 3 Coverall OSHA 1910.132 and OSHA

1910.120
NA TBD TBD TBD NA TBD
142 Kappler Responder® Level B OSHA 1910.132 and OSHA

Coverall 1910.120
76
Coverall 1910.120

Coverall 1910.120

1910.120
NA TBD NA TBD TBD

1910.120

1910.120
NA TBD NA TBD TBD
149 Kappler CPF 3 Coverall NA
August 2001
* n n
s tio t io s
on t ec t ec tion
ti o on ts
ula ro Pr ti di en
P s on y
eg s nt ec C r em
s ge ge io tal fo bi e) ty ui
n A ct fP m o s lab ili eq
tio lA te o en o M i R t
a cal o n /C y/ f U va ab
ca ic Pr io nm A ty er ng os
e ifi o gi t ro ht t e rit e o
s ili ni
# rt em s ra vi g x a s e ib und tC
Coverall
TBD TBD
174 Lakeland Tychem® 9400 Level B NA

Coverall
TBD TBD

Coverall
TBD TBD
162 Lakeland Tyvek® QC Level B NA

Coverall
TBD
77
Coverall
TBD

Coverall
TBD

Coverall
TBD

Coverall
TBD TBD

Coverall
TBD TBD

Coverall TBD TBD
August 2001
* n n
tio io s
ns c ect on
io te ot ti ts
at o i on di en
ul Pr Pr t
eg s s ec on y m
/R nt nt n ot lC rt lit e re
ge io r a fo bi e) bl ty ui
ns ge ct fP nt m o ili eq
io l A lA t e o e o /M Us a ila R t
at a a o n y f v y ab
e i c ic ic Pr io nm t/C rit o A lit er ng os
tif e m l og s r at iro i gh e s ibi nd ini tC
z s u a ni
Coverall
TBD TBD

Coverall
TBD TBD

Level B Coverall
TBD TBD

Level B Coverall
TBD TBD
78
Coverall
TBD TBD
159 Lakeland Tyvek QC Level B NA

Coverall
TBD TBD

Coverall
TBD TBD

Level B Coverall
TBD TBD

Level B Coverall
TBD TBD

Level B Coverall
TBD
August 2001
* n n
tio io s
ns c ect on
tio o te ot ti ts
la Pr ti on di en
gu Pr s on y m
e s nt ec re
ge ge io a fo bi e) bl ty ui
ns A ct fP nt m o ili eq
tio l lA t e o e o /M Us a ila R t
a a o n y f v y ab
ca ic ic Pr io nm t/C rit o A lit er ng os
e it fi m og s at iro gh s bi nd ni
# r e l r v e i x te ase
z e s i u a i tC
am e h io M u e ni
Level B Coverall
TBD

Level B Coverall
TBD

Level B Coverall
TBD

Level B Coverall
TBD
79
Level B Coverall
TBD
176 The US Air Force Saratoga U.S. and NATO military

CWU-66/P Chemical Protective chemical protection
Flight Coverall specifications TBD
178 SEA Tyvk® F Suit European standards
NA
Table 8-7. Percutaneous protection (ensembles - other)
August 2001
* n n
s tio ctio s
ti on t ec te tion ts
o n
P s on y
eg s nt ec C r em
s ge ge t io tal fo bi e) ty ui
n A fP m o s lab ili eq
tio lA ec o en o M i R t
a cal ot n /C y/ f U va ab
ca ic Pr io nm A ty er ng os
e ifi o gi t ro ht t e rit e o
s ili ni
# rt em s ra vi g x a s e ib und tC
74 C-Cover S-89 One Piece NBC Meets NATO Military Standards
Protective Overgarment for NBC Ensemble
(disposable) Swedish Defense Lab Certification
TBD TBD TBD
76 C-Cover Dress S-97 NBC NATO Military Standards for NBC

Protective Overgarment Ensemble
(disposable) Swedish Defense Lab Certification
TBD TBD
83 Disposable Toxicological Agent ASTM F 1359-97, NFPA 1991,

Protective Suit (DTAPS)/Level C1 ASTM D3786, ASTM D5034,
(for field use) ASTM D1117; will be NFPA 1994
certified
84 Disposable Toxicological Agent ASTM F 1359-97, NFPA 1991,

Protective Suit (DTAPS)/Level C2 ASTM D3786, ASTM D5034,
(for hospital use) ASTM D1117; will be NFPA 1994
80
certified
85 Demilitarization Protective Not specified

Ensembles (DPEs)
TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
86 "Hot" Operation: Air-Fed Not specified

Garments
TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
Table 8-8. Percutaneous protection (overgarments)
August 2001
* n n
tio io s
ns c e ct on
atio o te ot ti ts
Pr ti on di en
ul Pr s on m
eg s ec C y
/R nt nt n ot rt lit le re
ge io r tal fo y ui
ns ge ct fP m obi se)
l ab li it eq
A lA e o en o M U i R t
atio al ca ot n /C y/ f va ab
ic ic i Pr io nm rit e o A ty er ng os
e og t ro g ht t e s s ili nd ni C
# tif em s ra vi x a e ib u i t
am er h i ol M u ei e (E z s a ni
ID N C C B TI D En W D Si Vi La Tr U
45 EUROLITE NBC-Protection Suit Products tested by TNO, which
certifies NATO standard for our
products. TBD
50 IPE (Individual Protection Canadian Department of National
Equipment) Defence
TBD TBD
75 C-Cover S/89N (transparent body Not specified
cover)
TBD NA TBD
77 Saratoga HAMMER Suit MIL-C-29462
78 Saratoga Joint Service DoD, U.S. and NATO military

Lightweight Integrated Suit chemical protection
(JSLIST) specifications.
81
175 Chemical Protective Specification MIL-U-44435.
Overgarments (CPO) Governed by International Traffic
LANX Fabric Systems and Arms Regulations (ITAR). TBD TBD
177 CB Incident Emergency Escape Not specified

Kit
TBD TBD TBD NA TBD TBD
179 NewPac Cemi Cover Dress C/91 EU directives 89/686/EEC; Article
10, New Pac TS C/9107-2
NA
180 NewPac First Responder PPE Kit EU directives 89/686/EEC; Article
10, and pending NFPA 1994. For
APR: 42 CFR 84, pending NFPA TBD NA
1994.
Table 8-9. Selection factor key for percutaneous protection (garments)
August 2001
n n
io io s
ct ct on
te te ti ts
o ro di en t)
Pr P n
s s tio on em gh )
nt nt n a lC rt ity e r t) Ti
ge io ur ta fo
il )
bl ty ui gh as a lls
ge ct D ob e ili eq Ti G
lA lA te n en om / M Us a ila b R er
ca o io m /C y f v y a g as ot ov
ica i Pr ct n t rit o A lit er in ( G N C
m log s te iro gh e s i bi nd in t t( t(
he io M o nv ei e x te ase
z s u a os os os
C B TI Pr E W D (E Si Vi La Tr C C C
Easily Less than or

Able to be
Protects against Protects against manageable, Little to no Less than or Less than or equal to $75 for
Protects against Protects up to Protects in all At least 5 sizes 90 % to 100 % cleaned and
all nerve and all biological able to be worn Not limiting training equal to $500 equal to $100 single unit or
all TIMs listed 2 h environments available visibility reused greater
blister agents agents for long periods required per unit per unit $150 for bulk
than 50 times
with no effects packaging
Able to be
visibility reused 25 to 50
times
Greater than
Protects against Manageable, $75 (single unit)
Protects against Able to be Greater than Greater than
some of the Protects in but unable to Some loss of Some training or $150 (bulk)
some biological Protects against Protects 30 min normal At least 4 sizes 50 % to 75 % cleaned and $500 but less $100 but less
nerve and blister wear for more mobility, range required, 4 h or but less than
multiple TIMs to 90 min available visibility reused 5 to 50 than $1000 per than $500 per
82
agents environments than 1 h to 2 h of motion more $300 for single
agents times unit unit
at a time item or bulk
packaging
Not intended for

reuse, but can
be hand cleaned
to remove dirt
and dust
Continuous
Very heavy and training
Protects against Greater than or
Protects against Protects against Protects less Protects only in cumbersome, required with Greater than or Greater than or
none of the Less than 50 % Unable to be equal to $300
specific unable to wear Very limiting One size fits all recertification equal to $1000 equal to $500
blister or nerve no biological none of the than 30 min visibility reused for single unit or
agents environments for prolonged every few per unit per unit
agents TIMs listed bulk packaging
periods months
9. EVALUATION OF PERCUTANEOUS PROTECTION (APPAREL)
The market survey (refer to sec. 2.0 of Vol. IIc) conducted for CB agent and TIM personal
protective equipment identified 74 additional protective items (protective apparel). The details of
the market survey, including data on each item, are provided in Volume IIc of this guide. This
section documents the results of evaluating each item versus the 12 selection factors provided in
section 6 of this volume. Section 9.1 identifies the types of protective apparel and section 9.2
discusses the evaluation results.
9.1 Protective Apparel
Other protective apparel includes ancillary clothing items and accessories that complete or
supplement a particular protective ensemble (e.g., hoods, aprons, sleeves, gloves, boots, and boot
covers). These items are generally intended for use in situations where the physical contact with
hazardous material is limited and the hazard is completely characterized.
In order to display the evaluation results in a meaningful format, the apparel was grouped into
the categories based on the type of protection that was provided and not the level of protection.
• Hoods provide a protective barrier that completely covers the heads and shoulders of the
wearer and their respirator.
• Foot protection includes safety boots, boot covers, shoe covers, and socks. Some of these
items are constructed to provide protection from crushing and others provide only barrier
protection.
• Hand protection includes gloves (inner and outer) and sleeves. Like foot protection, some
items afford abrasive protection while others provide only barrier protection.
• Aprons, labcoats, and ponchos provide barrier protection. They are available in a variety of
configurations.
• Undergarments provide an extra level of protection.
• Casualty bags provide barrier protection.
• Personal cooling equipment are not true personal protective items, but they do reduce heat
stress when worn with PPE.
The evaluation results for the percutaneous protective garments are presented in tabular format
for the 74 pieces of protective apparel identified at the time this guide was written. A table is
presented for each of the identified categories. Each table includes the specific equipment and
the symbol that corresponds to how the equipment item was characterized based upon each of
the selection factor definitions. The acronym “TBD” is displayed in the appropriate cell if data
83
were not available to characterize a specific selection factor. The acronym “NA” is displayed in
the appropriate cell if the data were not applicable for a piece of equipment. The results of
categorizing the percutaneous protective apparel are presented in table 9−1.
Table 9−1. Percutaneous protective apparel
Percutaneous Protective Items

Hoods 16
Foot protection 13
Hand protection 14
Shirts, pants, jackets, and overalls 12
Aprons, labcoats, and ponchos 10
Undergarments 2
Casualty bags 3
Personal cooling 4
Total 74
Table 9-2 provides the table number and associated table pages for each of the usage categories.
Table 9-2. Evaluation results reference table

Percutaneous protection (hoods) 9−3 86−87
Percutaneous protection (foot protection) 9−4 88−89
Percutaneous protection (hand protection) 9−5 90−91
Percutaneous protection (shirts, pants, 9−6 92−93
jackets, and overalls)
Percutaneous protection (aprons, labcoats, 9−7 94
and ponchos)
Percutaneous protection (undergarments) 9−8 95
Percutaneous protection (casualty bags) 9−9 96
Percutaneous protection (personal 9−10 97
cooling)
Selection factor key for percutaneous 9−11 98
protection (apparel)
Table 9−3 details the evaluation results for percutaneous protection (hoods).
Table 9−4 details the evaluation results for percutaneous protection (foot protection).
Table 9−5 details the evaluation results for percutaneous protection (hand protection).
Table 9−6 details the evaluation results for percutaneous protection (shirts, pants, jackets, and
overalls).
Table 9−7 details the evaluation results for percutaneous protection (aprons, labcoats, and
ponchos).
84
Table 9−8 details the evaluation results for percutaneous protection (undergarments).
Table 9−9 details the evaluation results for percutaneous protection (casualty bags).
Table 9−10 details the evaluation results for percutaneous (personal cooling).
Table 9–11 details the evaluation results for percutaneous protective equipment (apparel).
85
Table 9-3. Percutaneous protection (hoods)
August 2001
n n
s* tio ctio s
tion tec te tion ts
o n
ula ro Pr tio di en
P on y
eg s n ts t ec C r em
/R nt n ro rt lit s
s ge ge t io P tal fo bi e) ze ty ui
o s ili eq
tion lA lA ec of en om / M U Si R t
a ca ot n e r ab
i ca ic Pr io nm t/C ity of bl ty ng os
e if o gi t ro t ila ili de ni
# rt em s ra vi i gh er se ib un tC
am e h i ol M u e ex a va s ai ni
ID N C C B TI D En W D (E A Vi La Tr U
18 Tyvek® Hood ASTM D3776-85, ASTM D1777-64,
ASTM D1682 (MD/CD), ASTM
D1682 (MD/CD), ASTM D226 NA TBD TBD TBD
(MD/CD)

(MD/CD)

(MD/CD)
24 Tychem® QC Hood ASTM D3776-85, ASTM D1777-64,

ASTM D3786-87, ASTM D1682-64,
ASTM D1117-8 TBD TBD TBD TBD
86
25 Tychem® QC Hood ASTM D3776-85, ASTM D1777-64,
ASTM D3786-87, ASTM D1682-64,
ASTM D1117-8 TBD TBD TBD TBD
26 Tychem® SL Hood ASTM D3776-85, ASTM D1777-64,

ASTM D3786-87, ASTM D1682-64,
ASTM D1117 TBD TBD
27 Tychem® BR Hood/vest ASTM D3776-85, ASTM D1777-64,

ASTM D3787-89, ASTM D5034,
ASTM D5597 TBD
28 Tychem® TK Hood/vest ASTM D3776, ASTM D177, ASTM

D3787, ASTM D15034, ASTM
D5733 TBD
38 Kappler CPF 4 Hood OSHA 1910.132 and OSHA

1910.120, ASTM D751 Test
Battery NA TBD TBD
Table 9-3. Percutaneous protection (hoods)-Continued
August 2001
n n
s* tio ctio ns
ti on tec ote n i tio ts
la P ro Pr tio nd en
gu s ts ect o ty em
e nt lC t s r
/R e g en i on ro t a f or b ili ) ty ui
s g A c t f P n o se ze ili
on A l e o e o m / M U Si b eq
ti a l a o t e r a R t
ic n nm /C ity of bl ty g os
e ca ic Pr io ro ht la ili de in
tifi em l og s r at v i i g t er se i ib n in tC
# am h io M u e ex a va s u a ni
N er C B TI D En W D (E A Vi La Tr U
ID C
42 Lakeland Tychem 10,000 Not specified
Level B Hood
TBD TBD
46 Tyvek QC Level B Hood Not specified
TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
48 Tychem SL Level B Hood Not specified
TBD TBD TBD TBD
49 Tychem SL Level B Hood Not specified
TBD TBD TBD TBD
54 Lakeland Tychem 9400 Not specified

Level B Hood
87
TBD TBD TBD

Level B Hood
TBD TBD
70 Chemical-Biological After testing at SBCCOM in

Eye/Respiratory April under Test Support
Disposable (C-BERD) Agreement (TSA) program, will
Hood/Mask be submitted to C-BERD for
NIOSH certification
Table 9-4. Percutaneous protection (foot protection)
August 2001
n n
s* tio io s
n c e ct on
atio o te ot ti ts
Pr ti on di en
ul Pr s c on
eg ts nt n te rt ity r em
/R n ro lC il ) s ui
ge ge tio P ta fo ze li ty
ns c en
ob se
Si eq
tio lA alA te of om /MU e a bi R t
a a ic o n nm y f ty
e ic ic g Pr io t/C rit o bl ili d er i ng os
tif lo s t ro gh ila tC
# am em M ra vi ei x te ase a s ib un a in
N er h io u e v ni
ID C C B TI D En W D (E A Vi La Tr U
1 Toxicological Agent CW Test Reports available
Protective (TAP) Boot (to 8 h requirement)
NA TBD NA NA
2 NBC Multipurpose Safety EN 345-2: 1997; CW Test Report

Boot from FOA Sweden available
TBD TBD NA NA
3 ACTON Basis NBC Overboot CW and Physical Property Test

Reports can be made available
NA TBD NA NA
4 ACTON Lightweight NBC CW and Physical Property Test

Overboot Report available
NA TBD NA NA
7 Bata HazMat Boots NFPA 199, 2000 Edition, ANSI

Std Z41-PR, Z41 Pt99 I/75 C/75,
88
CSA Std Z195 M92 Grade 1 TBD TBD NA TBD TBD
8 Bata Boot/Shoe Covers NFPA 199, 2000 Edition
TBD NA TBD TBD
11 Chemical Biological Meets NATO Military Standard

Protective Sock and Tested to ERDEC Mil-Std by
Natick NA NA
51 Tychem SL Level B Boots Not specified
TBD TBD NA TBD TBD
Table 9-4. Percutaneous protection (foot protection)-Continued
August 2001
n n
s* tio ctio s
i on tec te tion ts
at o n
ul ro Pr tio di en
g P on
e s n ts tec C ty r em
R nt n ro rt ili s y
s/ ge ge t io P tal fo ze ui
A ob se) i lit eq
ion lA ec of en om / M U Si R t
at al ca ot n y f e y ab g
e ic gi Pr nm t/C rit o bl lit er in os
fic m o s atio i ro gh ila bi d n C
# am ti ol i x te se
a a i un ai t
N er he i M ur nv e e v s ni
ID C C B TI D E W D (E A Vi La Tr U
Level B Boot Covers
TBD NA TBD
63 Rocky Shoes and Boots NFPA 1999, Protective Clothing

with Crosstech for Emergency Medical
Operations (1992 edition), ASTM TBD TBD TBD TBD NA NA
F 1671, ASTM F 903 (C)
64 Servus HZT Hazmat Knee NFPA 1991 Requirements

Boot
TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD NA TBD TBD
66 Saratoga Chemical System chemical tests meet

Protective Socks requirements of PD 97-04;
Independent test
data/certificate of compliance NA
is available
89
68 Tingley Hazproof SEI (Safety Equipment
Overboot Institute); Tested chemical
and physically per NFPA/SEI NA
available
Table 9-5. Percutaneous protection (hand protection)
August 2001
* n n
s t io c tio s
o n
ula ro Pr tio di en
P on y
R nt n ro rt lit
s/ ge ge t io P tal fo bi e) es ty ui
o s iz ili eq
ti on lA lA ec of en om / M U S R t
a a ca ot n e ab
ic ic Pr io nm t/C ity of bl ty er ng os
e o gi t ro t ila ili ni
# rtif em s ra vi i gh x
er se
a a ib und tC
am e h i ol M u e e v s ai ni
5 CB Moulded Glove With CW Test Information will be
Liner available in 2nd half of 2000
TBD TBD NA NA
6 Ansell-Edmont Sol-Vex ASTM standards; FDA-

Gloves accepted materials
TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD NA TBD TBD
9 BUTYL PLUS - NBC/Toxic Meets OSHA PPE and NATO

Protective Glove Military Standard NATO/UK Spec
SC/4985B, MIL G-12223J & TBD NA
OSHA PPE Std
10 MULTI- PLUS - Meets OSHA PPE

HAZMAT/Toxic Protective
Glove TBD TBD TBD NA
29 Integrated Chemical NATO Military Standard;

Biological Protective Glove NATO Standard Test
90
Requirement for CB NA NA
Ensemble
30 NBC gloves Ministry of Defense, Austria;

Test data can be obtained on
request. NA
33 Surgical Fit Gloves ISO-9001 Registered

(CP-14F, CP-14FR, CP-7F)
TBD TBD TBD TBD NA TBD TBD
34 Butyl Gloves ISO-9001 Registered; ASTM

F739-85 by TRI/Environmental,
Inc. Manufactured according
to Mil-G-43976, Mil-G-12223, TBD TBD TBD TBD NA TBD TBD
and ZZ-G-381
Table 9-5. Percutaneous protection (hand protection)-Continued
August 2001
n n
* io tio s
ns t c
it o tec te tion ts
o n
ula ro Pr tio di en
P on y
eg s n ts tec C r em
/R nt n ro rt lit s y
s ge ge t io P tal fo bi e) ze ui
n o s i lit eq
io lA lA ec of en om / Si R t
at a ca ot n
M fU
e ab g
c ic Pr nm t/C ity o bl ty er os
e ifi m o gi tio ro t er se i la ili d n in C
# t s a vi i gh a i b un t
am er he i ol M ur e ex va s ai ni
35 Neoprene Gloves ISO-9001 Registered;
Manufactured according to
ZZ-G-381. NFPA 1992,
NFPA 1991
TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD NA TBD TBD
47 Tyvek QC Level B Sleeves Not specified
TBD TBD TBD TBD NA TBD
52 Tychem SL Level B Sleeves Not specified
TBD TBD NA TBD

Level B Sleeves
TBD NA TBD
91
62 North Silver Shield Gloves Not specified
TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD NA TBD TBD
65 Saratoga Chemical Meets CW agent protection

Protective Gloves requirements of MIL-C-29462
date 15 April 1992; Independent
test data/certificate of compliance
NA TBD
available upon request
Table 9-6. Percutaneous protection (shirts, pants, jackets, and overalls)
August 2001
* n n
tio io s
ns c ect on
io te ot ti ts
at o i on di en
ul Pr Pr t
eg s s ec on y m
/R nt nt n ot lC rt lit s re
ge io r a fo bi e) ze ty ui
ns ge ct fP nt m o ili eq
io l A lA t e o e o /M Us Si R t
t a a o n y f e y r ab
e i ca ic ic Pr io nm t/C rit o bl lit ng os
m og s at iro gh ila bi de ni
# am tif e l r v i x te ase a i un a i tC
N er h io M u e e v s ni
ID C C B TI D En W D (E A Vi La Tr U
14 Tyvek® Shirt ASTM D3776-85, ASTM D1777-64,
ASTM D1682, ASTM D1682, ASTM
D2261 NA TBD TBD TBD NA
17 Tyvek® Pants ASTM D3776-85, ASTM D1777-64,

22 Tychem® QC Shirt ASTM D3776-85, ASTM D1777-64,

ASTM D3786-87, ASTM D1682-64,
ASTM D1117-80 TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
23 Tychem® QC Pants ASTM D3776-85, ASTM D1777-64,

ASTM D3786-87, ASTM D1682-64,
ASTM D1117-80 TBD TBD TBD TBD NA
37 Kappler CPF 4 Bib Overall OSHA 1910.132 and OSHA

1910.120; ASTM D751 Test Battery
92
NA NA TBD TBD
39 Kappler CPF 4 Jacket OSHA 1910.132 and OSHA

NA NA TBD TBD

Level B Overalls
NA TBD TBD

Level B Jacket
NA TBD TBD
44 Tyvek QC Level B Jacket Not specified
Table 9-6. Percutaneous protection (shirts, pants, jackets, and overalls)
August 2001
* n n
s tio tio s
ion tec t ec tion
at o n ts
ul ro Pr tio di en
P on y m
eg s n ts t ec C
/R nt n ro rt lit s i re
ge ge t io P tal fo bi e) ze ty u
ns A o s ili eq
tio l lA t ec of en om / M U Si R t
a ca n e r ab g
ic i ca P ro io nm t/C ity of bl ty os
e m gi ro t i la ili de nin C
# tif lo s at vi i gh er se i b un i t
am er he io IM ur e ex a va s a ni
ID N C C B T D En W D (E A Vi La Tr U
14 Tyvek® Shirt ASTM D3776-85, ASTM D1777-64,
17 Tyvek® Pants ASTM D3776-85, ASTM D1777-64,

22 Tychem® QC Shirt ASTM D3776-85, ASTM D1777-64,

ASTM D3786-87, ASTM D1682-64,
ASTM D1117-80 TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
23 Tychem® QC Pants ASTM D3776-85, ASTM D1777-64,

ASTM D3786-87, ASTM D1682-64,
37 Kappler CPF 4 Bib Overall OSHA 1910.132 and OSHA

NA NA TBD TBD
93
39 Kappler CPF 4 Jacket OSHA 1910.132 and OSHA
NA NA TBD TBD

Level B Overalls
NA TBD TBD

Level B Jacket
NA TBD TBD
44 Tyvek QC Level B Jacket Not specified
Table 9-7. Percutaneous protection (aprons, labcoats, and ponchos)
August 2001
n n
n s* t io ctio ns
tio tec ote n itio ts
ula ro Pr tio nd en
P o
eg s ts ect t ty r em
/R e nt en i on ro a lC or bili ) es ui
g g t P t f iz ty
o se
S ili eq
io l t o o / U e ab R t
at al ca o n nm /C ity of bl ty r os
e ic ic gi Pr tio ro ht la ili de ng
# tif m l o s a v i i g t er se i ib n ni tC
am er he io M ur e ex a va s u ai ni
12 Tyvek® Labcoat ASTM D3776-85, ASTM D1777-64,
ASTM D1682, ASTM D1682,
ASTM D2261 NA TBD TBD TBD NA
21 Tychem® QC Labcoat ASTM D3776-85, ASTM D1777-64,
ASTM D3786-87, ASTM D1682-64,
31 NBC-Cover Poncho Ministry of Defense, Austria; Test
94
data can be obtained on request
NA
43 Lakeland Tychem 10,000 TBD
Level B Apron
NA TBD TBD
50 Tychem SL Level B Apron TBD
TBD TBD NA TBD

56 Lakeland Tychem 9400 TBD
Level B Apron
TBD NA TBD
61 PONCHO NP/60 TBD
TBD TBD TBD TBD NA TBD TBD TBD
Table 9-8. Percutaneous protection (undergarments)
August 2001
n n
n s* t io ctio ns
tio tec ote n itio ts
ula ro Pr tio nd en
P o
eg s ts ec
t t ty r em
/ R e nt en i on ro a lC or bili ) es ui
g g t P t f iz ty
o se
S ili eq
tio l t o o / U e ab R t
al ca o n nm /C ity of bl ty r os
e i ca ic gi Pr tio ht ili de ng
tif m l o s a i ro i g t er se ila ib n ni tC
# am er he io M ur v e ex a va s u ai ni
59 Chemical Protective Military Specification MIL-U-44435;
Undergarment (CPU) AVLAG Test Operating Procedure
(TOP) 8-2-501 TBD NA TBD
67 Saratoga Chemical MIL-C-29462; Independent test

Protective Undergarment data/certificate of compliance is
available upon request TBD NA
95
Table 9-9. Percutaneous protection (casualty bags)
August 2001
* n n
s tio t io s
i on t ec t ec tion
t o on ts
u la ro Pr ti di en
P s on y
eg s nt ec C r em
/R nt n rot rt lit
s ge ge t io tal fo bi e) es ty ui
A fP m o s iz ili eq
ion lA ec o en o M S R t
at a cal ot n /C y/ f U le ab
ic ic Pr io nm ty er ng os
e if o gi t ro ht t e rit e o
ilab ili ni
# rt em s ra vi g x a s a ib und tC
am e h i ol M u ei e v s ai ni
32 NBC-Casualty Bag Ministry of Defense, Austria;
Test data can be obtained
on request. NA
36 Casualty Bag Canadian Department of

National Defence; Available
from Irvin Aerospace TBD NA NA
Canada Ltd.
69 Weapons of Mass Destruction NA

(WMD) Contamination
Containment Bag NA
96
Table 9-10. Percutaneous protection (personal cooling)
August 2001
n n
n s* tio ctio ns
tio tec o te n itio ts
a ro en
ul P Pr tio nd
eg s ts tec o m
nt n n C rt ity s i re
s/R ge io ro tal fo
il ) ty u
ge t P ob e ze ili
on A lA ec of en om / M Us Si b eq
ti al ot y f e y a R t
ca ca n nm t/C bl er os
e i ic gi Pr tio ro rit o lit d i ng C
# tif m o s a i i gh x aila i bi n t
am er he i ol M ur nv e e
te ase
v s un ai ni
ID N C C B TI D E W D (E A Vi La Tr U
71 ILC Model 15 Cool Vest NA
NA NA NA NA
72 ILC Model 19 Cool Vest Type Classified by United States

Army, 1997
NA NA NA NA
73 Personal Ice Cooling System NA

(PICS)
NA NA NA u NA
74 Flexi ICE Cold Vest NA
NA NA NA NA TBD TBD
97
Table 9-11. Selection factor key for percutaneous protective equipment (apparel)
August 2001
n n )
io io ts
ct ect ons
te ot n iti en ts
o io d ) m n)
Pr Pr ct s ar en tio rm
s te on y r on (G em ec A
nts nt n C t lit r t d
ge io ro t al f or b le Ap b le ui ) ro n
ge A t P o bi e)
s l ity P a )
A ec of en om /M U ila nd ila bi eq ds d n) er
al al ot va y a R oo ot th
ic n nm t /C ity of A
va s a
A er H Fo an tio
O
ic g Pr it o o r lit d ng H c
em lo s r a ir i gh e s i bi ini t( t( t ( te t(
h io M u v e e x te ase es ood
z z s un a os os os Pro os
C B TI D En W D (E Si (H Si Vi La Tr C C C C
Easily
manageable, Able to be Less than or Less than or
Protects Protects
Protects Many 90 % to cleaned and Little to no Less than or Less than or equal to $75 for equal to $75 for
against all against all Protects up to Protects in all able to be One size
against all Not limiting available 100 % reused training equal to $500 equal to $100 single unit or single unit or
nerve and biological 2h environments worn for long fits all
TIMs listed periods with sizes visibility greater required per unit per unit $150 for bulk $150 for bulk
blister agents agents
no effects than 50 times packaging packaging
Able to be
visibility reused 25 to
50 times
Greater than Greater than

Manageable, $75 (single $75 (single
Protects Able to be Some
Protects but unable to Some loss Greater than Greater than unit) or $150 unit) or $150
against some Protects Protects in Small, training
Protects 30 wear for of mobility, 50 % to 75 % cleaned and $500 but less $100 but less (bulk) but less (bulk) but less
of the nerve against some against normal medium, reused 5 to required, 4 h
biological min to 90 min more range visibility than $1000 than $500 per than $300 for than $300 for
98
and blister multiple TIMs environments than 1 h to and large 50 times or more
agents of motion per unit unit single item or single item or
agents
2 h at a time bulk packaging bulk packaging
Not intended
for reuse, but
can be hand
cleaned to
remove dirt
and dust
Very heavy Continuous

Protects and Greater than Greater than
Protects Protects Numerous training Greater than
against none Protects only cumbersome, Greater than or equal to or equal to
against no against none Protects less sizes, One size Less than Unable to be required with or equal to
of the blister specific unable to Very or equal to $300 for single $300 for single
biological of the TIMs than 30 min requires fits all 50 % visibility reused recertification $1000
or nerve environments wear for limiting $500 per unit unit or bulk unit or bulk
agents listed fit test every few per unit
agents prolonged packaging packaging
months
periods
APPENDIX A––RECOMMENDED QUESTIONS ON PERSONAL
PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT
APPENDIX A––RECOMMENDED QUESTIONS ON PERSONAL
PROTECTION EQUIPMENT 1
Buying detection, protection, decontamination, and communication equipment to respond to the

threatened terrorist use of chemical or biological warfare agents may be new for public safety
agencies. To help procurement officials obtain the best value for their domestic preparedness
dollar, the staff of the Center for Domestic Preparedness (Fort McClellan, AL), military
Chemical/Biological Units, the National Institute of Justice, and members of a Federal Inter
Agency Board (that includes representatives from the State and local law enforcement, medical,
and fire communities) have compiled a series of questions. These questions should assist
officials in selecting products from the large number in the present day marketplace. Requesting
vendors to provide written responses to your specific questions may also be helpful in the
decision process.
1. What chemical warfare agents, toxic industrial chemicals, and biological agents has the
equipment been tested against?
2. What were the testing procedures and standards NFPA, ASTM, NIOSH, U.S. Military
Standards, NATO, European Standards, MILSPEC?
3. Who conducted the tests and when? Have the test results been verified by an independent
laboratory or only by the manufacturer?
4. What types of tests were conducted––spray, vapor, man-in- simulant (MIST)?
5. Were respirators, suits, gloves, and boots tested against the agents individually or as part of
an integrated ensemble?
6. Is the test data available? Where? How can I get a copy? Curves showing concentration as
a function of time are better than just a single breakthrough time.
7. Was the equipment ever used in live agent testing? Who did the testing and is the data
available?
8. What is the fabric used to make the suits? How are the seams put together? Simple sewn
seams are weakest, covered or bound seams are better.
9. What are the breaking strength and tear strengths of the fabrics? How was the equipment
wear and tear tested?
10. If the manufacturer recommends sealing seams with tape, ask why and whether that was the
configuration the suit was tested in?
11. How flammable is the fabric and how quickly will a hot ember melt through the fabric
compromising protection? Is there an aluminized version or overcover for use where there is
a fire threat in addition to the toxic agent?
12. How long does it take to don the equipment and can one person do it or is a buddy system
required? Does the equipment allow sufficient operational flexibility to do the job to include
use of firearms?
13. What boot and glove sizes are available? Does suit sizing consider people with special
builds? For suits, ask for nominal heights and weights––one size does not fit all!
14. What training is required to fit face masks? Does the company provide those services and
how frequently? How do the masks accommodate prescription glasses, long hair or facial
hair?
1
The information in Appendix A was provided by the National Domestic Preparedness Office (NDPO) in coordination with the National Institute
of Justice and the Technical Support Working Group.
A−1
15. How long can responder safely work in the suit at 50 o F, at 70 o F and at 90 o F? Are cooling
suits available to help manage heat stress? How much do they cost and what are the
maintenance requirements? Do the cooling suits require any penetrations of the suit?
16. Can the protective equipment be decontaminated after use or must it be disposed of? What
are the decon and sampling procedures? What tests are required to verify that protection
capability has not been compromised in the process? What are the procedures and costs for
disposing of used equipment, for example spent mask filters?
17. How long has the company/manufacturer been involved with the Chem-Bio-Nuc and first
responder industries?
18. Ask for names and phone numbers of departments currently using the company’s equipment.
Ask to follow-up on the phone any written testimonials.
19. What additional items are required to operate/maintain the equipment? At what cost?
20. What training materials are provided––manuals, videotapes? Are less expensive training
suits available? Is there a chart available identifying PPE requirements as a function of
agents and concentrations?
21. What type of warranty/maintenance support is offered? Cost?
22. What is the return rate on the equipment under warranty? What are the top five reasons for
failure?
23. What similar companies’ products has this product been tested against?
24. What is the shelf life for the equipment? (Open-exposed, closed-exposed, open-unexposed,
closed-unexposed). What is the recommended storage procedure after opening (hanging,
folded, etc.)? What factors, if any, decrease shelf life (UV, critical temperature…)?
25. What are the environmental limitations––high temp, low temp, humidity, sand/dust, or
broken glass?
A−2
APPENDIX B––REFERENCES
APPENDIX B––REFERENCES
1. Armando S. Bevelacqua and Richard H. Stilp, Terrorism Handbook for Operational

Responders, Emergency Film Group, Edgartown, MA, January 1998.
2. Robert E. Hunt, Timothy Hayes, and Warren B. Carroll, Guidelines for Mass Casualty
Decontamination During a Terrorist Chemical Agent Incident, Battelle, Columbus, OH,
September 1999.
3. A.K. Stuempfle, D.J. Howells, S.J. Armour, and C.A. Boulet, International Task Force 25:
Hazard from Industrial Chemicals Final Report, Edgewood Research Development and
Engineering Center, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, AD-B236562, ERDEC-SP-061, April
1998.
4. Responding to a Biological or Chemical Threat: A Practical Guide, U.S. Department of

State, Bureau of Diplomatic Security, Washington, DC, 1996.
5. 2000 Emergency Response Guidebook, A Guidebook for First Responders During the Initial
Phase of a Dangerous Goods/Hazardous Materials Incident, U.S. Department of
Transportation, Research and Special Programs Administration, Tempest Publishing,
Alexandria, VA, January 2000.
6. Potential Military Chemical/Biological Agents and Compounds, FM 3-9, AFR 355-7;

NAVFAC P-467, Army Chemical School, Fort McClellan, AL, December 12, 1990.
7. B. Newman, Opening the Case of the Poison Umbrella. The Wall Street Journal, May 24,
1991.
8. Information on equipment regulatory and/or certifying authorities listed in tables in sections

7, 8, and 9 can be found at the following websites:
http://www.cdc.gov/
http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/homepage.html
http://www.osha-slc.gov/html/subject-index.html
http://www.osha-slc.gov/
http://www.cdc.gov/other.htm
http://www.nfpa.org/Home/index.asp
http://www.osha-slc.gov/dts/osta/otm/otm_viii/otm_viii_1.html
B–1 3
APPENDIX C––IMMEDIATELY DANGEROUS TO LIFE AND
HEALTH (IDLH) VALUES
Chemical Warfare Agent IDLH (ppm)*
GA/Tabun 0.03
GB/Sarin 0.03
GD/Soman 0.008
VX 0.002
H/Mustard 0.0004
L/Lewisite 0.0003
TIMs IDLH (ppm)

1,2-Dimethylhydrazine 15
**
Acetone cyanohydrin
Acrolein 2
Acrylonitrile 85
Allyl alcohol 20
Allyl chlorocarbonate
Allyl isothiocyanate
Allylamine
Ammonia 300
Arsenic trichloride
Arsine 3
Boron tribromide
Boron trichloride ND
Boron trifluoride 25
Bromine 3
Bromine chloride
Bromine pentafluoride
Bromine trifluoride
Carbon disulfide 500
Carbon monoxide 1200
Carbonyl fluoride
Carbonyl sulfide
Chlorine 10
Chlorine pentafluoride
Chlorine trifluoride 20
Chloroacetaldehyde 45
Chloroacetone
Chloroacetonitrile
Chloroacetyl chloride
Chlorosulfonic acid
Crotonaldehyde 50
Cyanogen chloride
Diborane 15
Diketene
Dimethyl sulfate 7
Diphenylmethane-4,4'-diisocyanate
*
parts per million (ppm).
**
Blank fields not determined.
C−1
TIMs IDLH (ppm)
Ethyl phosphonic dichloride
Ethyl phosphonothioic dichloride
Ethyl chloroformate
Ethyl chlorothiolformate
Ethylene dibromide 100
Ethylene oxide 800
Ethyleneimine 100
Fluorine 25
Formaldehyde 20
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
Hydrogen bromide 30
Hydrogen chloride 50
Hydrogen cyanide 50
Hydrogen fluoride 30
Hydrogen iodide
Hydrogen selenide 1
Hydrogen sulfide 100
Iron pentacarbonyl
Isobutyl chloroformate
Isopropyl chloroformate
Isopropyl isocyanate
Methanesulfonyl chloride
Methyl bromide 250
Methyl chloroformate
Methyl chlorosilane
Methyl hydrazine 20
Methyl isocyanate 3
Methyl mercaptan 150
n-Butyl chloroformate
n-Butyl isocyanate
Nitric acid, fuming 25
Nitric oxide 100
Nitrogen dioxide 20
n-Propyl chloroformate
Parathion 0.8
Perchloromethyl mercaptan 10
Phosgene 2
Phosphine 50
Phosphorus oxychloride
Phosphorus pentafluoride
Phosphorus trichloride 25
sec-Butyl chloroformate
Selenium hexafluoride 2
Silicon tetrafluoride
Stibine 5
Sulfur dioxide 100
Sulfur trioxide 1
C−2
TIMs IDLH (ppm)
Sulfuric acid 4
Sulfuryl chloride
Sulfuryl fluoride 200
Tellurium hexafluoride 1
tert-Butyl isocyanate
n-Octyl mercaptan
Tetraethyl lead 3
Tetraethyl pyrophosphate 0.4
Tetramethyl lead 3
Titanium tetrachloride
Toluene 2,4-diisocyanate 2.5
Toluene 2,6-diisocyanate 2.5
Trichloroacetyl chloride
Trifluoroacetyl chloride
Tungsten hexafluoride
C−3
ABOUT THE LAW ENFORCEMENT AND CORRECTIONS
STANDARDS AND TESTING PROGRAM
The Law Enforcement and Corrections Standards and Testing Program is sponsored by the Office of
Science and Technology of the National Institute of Justice (NIJ), U.S. Department of Justice. The program
responds to the mandate of the Justice System Improvement Act of 1979, directed NIJ to encourage
research and development to improve the criminal justice system and to disseminate the results to Federal,
State, and local agencies.
The Law Enforcement and Corrections Standards and Testing Program is an applied research effort that
determines the technological needs of justice system agencies, sets minimum performance standards for
specific devices, tests commercially available equipment against those standards, and disseminates the
standards and the test results to criminal justice agencies nationally and internationally.
The program operates through:
The Law Enforcement and Corrections Technology Advisory Council (LECTAC), consisting of
nationally recognized criminal justice practitioners from Federal, State, and local agencies, which assesses
technological needs and sets priorities for research programs and items to be evaluated and tested.
The Office of Law Enforcement Standards (OLES) at the National Institute of Standards and Technology,
which develops voluntary national performance standards for compliance testing to ensure that individual
items of equipment are suitable for use by criminal justice agencies. The standards are based upon laboratory
testing and evaluation of representative samples of each item of equipment to determine the key attributes,
develop test methods, and establish minimum performance requirements for each essential attribute. In
addition to the highly technical standards, OLES also produces technical reports and user guidelines that
explain in nontechnical terms the capabilities of available equipment.
The National Law Enforcement and Corrections Technology Center (NLECTC), operated by a grantee,
which supervises a national compliance testing program conducted by independent laboratories. The
standards developed by OLES serve as performance benchmarks against which commercial equipment is
measured. The facilities, personnel, and testing capabilities of the independent laboratories are evaluated by
OLES prior to testing each item of equipment, and OLES helps the NLECTC staff review and analyze data.
Test results are published in Equipment Performance Reports designed to help justice system procurement
officials make informed purchasing decisions.
Publications are available at no charge through the National Law Enforcement and Corrections
Technology Center. Some documents are also available online through the Internet/World Wide Web. To
request a document or additional information, call 800–248–2742 or 301–519–5060, or write:
National Law Enforcement and Corrections Technology Center

P.O. Box 1160
Rockville, MD 20849–1160
E-Mail: asknlectc@nlectc.org
World Wide Web address: http://www.nlectc.org
This document is not intended to create, does not create, and may not be relied upon to create any rights,
substantive or procedural, enforceable at law by any party in any matter civil or criminal.
Opinions or points of view expressed in this document represent a consensus of the authors and do not
represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. The products and manufacturers
discussed in this document are presented for informational purposes only and do not constitute product
approval or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Justice.
The National Institute of Justice is a component of the Office of Justice Programs, which also includes the Bureau of Justice
Assistance, the Bureau of Justice Statistics, the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, and the Office for Victims
of Crime.

1

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

1

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

1

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

U.S.

National Institute of Justice

Guide for the Selection of Personal Protective

NIJ Guide 102–00

For grant and funding information, contact:

Office of Justice Programs National Institute of Justice

Guide for the Selection of Personal Protective Equipment for

NIJ Guide 102−00, Volume I

Dr. Alim A. Fatah1

This document was prepared under CBIAC contract number SPO−900−94−D−0002

C Researches the nature and impact of crime and delinquency.

Sarah V. Hart, Director

ACRONYMS SPECIFIC TO THIS DOCUMENT

2.1 The Purpose of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)

• Site Survey: Individuals conducting an initial investigation of a hazardous materials

• Hazard Mitigation: Individuals entering a hazardous materials area to prevent a potential

• Monitoring/Supervision: Individuals entering a hazardous materials area for the explicit

• Decontamination: Individuals providing decontamination support to personnel or equipment

2.2 Components of Personal Protective Ensembles

2−4. Bata boot/shoe covers, Figure 2−5. Tingley Hazproof overboot,

2.3 Levels of Protection

Level A Vapor protective suit (meets NFPA 1991)

3.1 Chemical Warfare Agents

3.1.1 Nerve Agents

3.1.1.2 Physical and Chemical Properties

The nerve agents considered in this guide are:

Table 3–1. Physical and chemical properties of common nerve agents

Molecular 162.3 140.1 182.2 180.2 267.4 18

3.1.1.3 Route of Entry

3.1.2 Blister Agents (Vesicants)

3.1.2.2 Physical and Chemical Properties

Table 3–2. Physical and chemical properties of common blister agents

Property HD HN-1 HN-2 HN-3 L Water

Molecular 159.1 170.1 156.1 204.5 207.4 18

3.1.2.3 Route of Entry

3.2 Toxic Industrial Materials (TIMs)

Table 3–3. Physical and chemical properties of TIMs

Property Ammonia Chlorine Cyanogen Hydrogen Water

3.2.2 TIM Rankings

3.2.2.2 Medium Hazard

3.2.2.3 Low Hazard

High Medium Low

3.3.1 Bacterial Agents

3.3.2 Viral Agents

Biological E. coli serotype

Biological Plague (Bubonic

Biological Rift Valley Venezuelan Equine

Transmissible No No Moderate Yes

Duration of 2 wk 1 wk Death between 7 d to 9 d to 12 d

Biological Rocky Mountain

Biological Staphylococcal Tricothecene Ricin (Isolated

In the context of PPE, respiratory protection systems or respirators provide protection by

4.1 Air-Purifying Respirators

1. Particulate-removing respirators are designed to reduce inhaled concentrations of harmful

Figure 4−3. Survivair® Belt Mounted PAPR, Survivair, A

4.1.2 Vapor and Gas Removal Mechanisms

Vapor-and gas-removing respirators normally remove the contaminant by interaction of its

4.1.3 Filter Efficiency and Efficiency Degradation

4.1.4 Powered Air-Purifying Respirators (PAPR)

4.2 Atmosphere-Supplying Respirators