Chapter02 - Guide To Use The Provisions
Chapter02 - Guide To Use The Provisions
Chapter02 - Guide To Use The Provisions
2
GUIDE TO USE OF THE PROVISIONS
Michael Valley, P.E.
The flow charts and table that follow are provided to assist the user of the NEHRP Recommended
Provisions and, by extension, the seismic provisions of ASCE 7, Minimum Design Loads for Buildings
and Other Structures, the International Building Code, and NFPA 5000. The flow charts provide an
overview of the complete process for satisfying the Provisions, including the content of all technical
chapters. The table that concludes this chapter provides cross references for ASCE 7 and the 2000 and
2000 editions of the NEHRP Recommended Provisions.
The flow charts are expected to be of most use to those who are unfamiliar with the scope of the NEHRP
Recommended Provisions, but they cannot substitute for a careful reading of the Provisions. Notes
indicate discrepancies and errors in the Provisions. Both editions of the Provisions can be obtained free
from the FEMA Publications Distribution Center by calling 1-800-480-2520. Order by FEMA
Publication number; the 2003 Provisions is available as FEMA 450 in CD form (only a limited number of
paper copies are available) and the 2000 Provisions are available as FEMA 368 and 369 (2 volumes and
maps).
Although the examples in this volume are based on the 2000 Provisions, they have been annotated to
reflect changes made to the 2003 Provisions. Annotations within brackets, [ ], indicate both
organizational changes (as a result of a reformat of all of the chapters of the 2003 Provisions) and
substantive technical changes to the 2003 Provisions and its primary reference documents. For those
readers coming from ASCE 7-05, see the cross reference table at the end of this chapter.
The level of detail shown varies, being greater where questions of applicability of the Provisions are
pertinent and less where a standard process of structural analysis or detailing is all that is required. The
details contained in the many standards referenced in the Provisions are not included; therefore, the actual
flow of information when proportioning structural members for the seismic load effects specified in the
Provisions will be considerably more complex.
On each chart the flow generally is from a heavy-weight box at the top-left to a medium-weight box at the
bottom-right. User decisions are identified by six-sided cells. Optional items and modified flow are
indicated by dashed lines.
Chart 2.1 provides an overall summary of the process which begins with consideration of the Scope of
Coverage and ends with Quality Assurance Requirements. All of the specific provisions pertaining to
nonbuilding structures are collected together on one page (Chart 2.20); application for nonbuilding
structures requires the use of various portions of the Provisions with appropriate modification.
Additions to, changes of use in, and alterations of existing structures are covered by the NEHRP
Recommended Provisions (see Chart 2.3), but evaluation and rehabilitation of existing structures is not.
FEMA 451, NEHRP Recommended Provisions: Design Examples
2-2
In recent years FEMA has sponsored several coordinated efforts dealing with seismic safety in existing
buildings. A Handbook for Seismic Evaluation of Buildings (FEMA 310) was developed as an update to
the original FEMA 178, although this document has since been replaced by the ASCE 31 Standard
(Seismic Evaluation of Existing Buildings). Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings
(FEMA 273) and a corresponding Commentary (FEMA 274) have also been developed. A prestandard
(FEMA 356, Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings) based on FEMA
273 has been developed and is in balloting as ASCE 41. In addition, specific recommendations have been
developed for the evaluation, repair, and rehabilitation of earthquake-damaged concrete and masonry wall
buildings (FEMA 306, 307, and 308) and for the evaluation, rehabilitation, post-earthquake assessment,
and repair of steel moment frame structures (FEMA 351 and 352).
Chapter 2, Guide to Use of the Provisions
2-3
Chart 2.2
Scope of Coverage
Chart 2.3
Application to Existing
Structures
Chart 2.4
Basic Requirements
Chart 2.22
Architectural, Mechanical,
Electrical Requirements
Chart 2.11
Strength Requirements
Chart 2.12
Deformation Requirements
Chart 2.13
Design and Detailing
Requirements
Chart 2.21
Foundations
Chart 2.5
Structural Design
Chart 2.23
Quality Assurance
Requirements
Chart 2.8
Modal Analysis
Chart 2.7
Soil-Structure
Interaction
Chart 2.6
ELF Analysis
Chart 2.10
Seismically
Isolated
Chart 2.14
Steel
Chart 2.15
Concrete
Chart 2.16
Precast
Chart 2.17
Composite
Chart 2.18
Masonry
Chart 2.19
Wood
Chart 2.20
Nonbuilding
Structures
Chart 2.9
Response History
Analysis
Chart 2.1
Overall Summary of Flow
FEMA 451, NEHRP Recommended Provisions: Design Examples
2-4
No
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Tank in SUG III?
Satisfy freeboard
requirement (Sec. 14.7.3.6.1.2)
[Sec. 14.4.7.5.3].
No
Yes
*The Provisions has never defined clearly the scope of application for structures assigned to Seismic
Design Category A. Although the framers of the Provisions intended application of only a few simple
requirements in Seismic Design Category A, a strict reading of the 2000 Provisions would lead to a
substantial list of items that remain within the scope. [As a result of the complete re-write of the Provisions
at the beginning of the 2003 update cycle, this situation is improved considerably as the requirements for
Seismic Design Category A all appear in Sec. 1.5.]
Determine if structure falls in scope
of the Provisions (Sec. 1.2 [1.1.2]).
Is it a self-supporting structure
which carries gravity loads?
Is structure a bridge, nuclear
power generation plant, offshore
platform, or dam?
Is the use agricultural with only
incidental human occupancy?
Is it a detached 1- or
2-family dwelling?
S
1
0.04 and
S
S
0.15?
Is it an existing structure?
Provisions not
applicable.
No requirements.
No additional
requirements.
Satisfy Sec. 5.2.5 and 5.2.6.1
(i.e., consider as Seismic
Design Category A)*.
Go to Chart 2.3.
Go to Chart 2.4.
SDC A, B, or C?
Wood frame dwelling designed
and constructed in accordance
with Sec. 12.5?
Determine S
S
and S
1
(Sec. 4.1.2 [3.3.1]).
Chart 2.2
Scope of Coverage
Chapter 2, Guide to Use of the Provisions
2-5
Addition to existing structure
(Sec. 1.2.2 [1.1.2.2]).
Change of use
(Sec. 1.2.3 [1.1.2.3]).
Is addition structurally
independent from existing
structure?
Is any element's seismic force
increased by more than 5% or its
seismic resistance decreased?
Do the affected elements still
comply with the Provisions?
Only addition or alteration
designed as new structure.
Go to Chart 2.4.
Entire structure designed
as new structure.
Go to Chart 2.4.
Change to higher
Seismic Use Group?
Change from Seismic Use
Group I to II and S
DS
<0.3?
No requirements.
Is seismic force on existing
structural elements increased
beyond their design strength?
Such alteration
not permitted.
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
* The Provisions applies to existing structures only in the cases of additions to, changes of use in, and
alterations of such structures.
No
No
Yes
Yes
*
Does alteration increase seismic
forces to or decrease design
strength of existing structural
elements by more than 5 percent?
Alteration of existing
structure (Sec. 1.2.4)
[Sec. 1.1.2.4].
Is the design strength of existing
structural elements required to
resist seismic forces reduced?
New structural elements and new
or relocated nonstructural elements
must be detailed and connected as
required by the Provisions.
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
*
Yes
*
Chart 2.3
Application to Existing Structures
FEMA 451, NEHRP Recommended Provisions: Design Examples
2-6
Determine Seismic Use Group
(Sec. 1.3 [1.2]) and Occupancy
Importance Factor (Sec. 1.4 [1.3]).
Using Spectral Acceleration Maps 1 through 24
(or CD-ROM) [Fig. 3.3-1 through 3.3-14],
determine the Maximum Considered Earthquake
(MCE) spectral response acceleration at short
periods (S
S
) and at 1 second (S
1
).
S
S
0.15 and
S
1
0.04?
Soil properties known in sufficient
detail to determine Site Class?
Classify the site (Sec. 4.1.2.1
through 4.1.2.3) [Sec. 3.5].
Site Class E or F?
Use Site Class D unless authority having
jurisdiction determines that Site Class E
or F could be present at the site.
Assign structure to Seismic Design Category A.
[As a result of the re-write of the Provisions during
the 2003 update cycle, all of the requirements for
Seismic Design Category A appear in Sec. 1.5 and
application is greatly simplified.]
Adjust MCE acceleration parameters
for site class (Sec. 4.1.2.4 [3.3.2]).
Calculate design earthquake acceleration
parameters S
DS
and S
D1
(Sec. 4.1.2.5 [3.3.3]).
Design response spectrum required
for the analysis to be used?
Detached 1- or 2-family
dwelling of light-frame
construction?
Site Class F or
base isolated?
Fulfill site limitation
(Sec. 4.2.2 [1.4.2]).
Perform site-specific evaluation
to determine design response
spectrum (Sec. 4.1.3 [3.4]).
S
1
>0.6 and
base isolated?
[For assignment of Seismic Design Category
and determination of values needed for other
calculations, compute S
DS
, S
D1
, S
MS
, and S
M1
as indicated in Sec. 3.4.5.]
Determine Seismic Design
Category (Sec. 4.2.1 [1.4.1]).
Calculate design
response spectrum
(Sec. 4.1.2.6 [3.3.4]).*
* [Sec. 3.3.4 of the 2003 Provisions defines reduced spectral ordinates for periods greater than T
L
.]
Go to Chart 2.5 for
structural requirements.
Go to Chart 2.22 for architectural,
mechanical, and electrical requirements.
Go to Chart 2.23 for quality
assurance requirements.
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes No
No
Yes
No
Chart 2.4
Basic Requirements
Chapter 2, Guide to Use of the Provisions
2-7
Use load combinations and
non-earthquake loads from
ASCE 7 (Sec. 5.1 [4.2.2]).
Comply with the stated design basis
(Sec. 5.2.1 [4.2.1]).
Seismic Design
Category A?
Height limits in Table 5.2.2
[4.3-1] apply.
Seismic Design
Category B or C?
Requirements for building height, interaction
effects, deformational compatibility, and
special moment frame continuity
(Sec. 5.2.2.4 [4.3.1.4, 4.5.2, 4.5.3]).
Seismic Design
Category F?
More stringent height limit
(Sec. 5.2.2.5 [4.3.1.6]).
Classify diaphragm flexibility (Sec. 5.2.3.1
[4.3.2.1]). Examine plan and vertical
regularity and meet minimum requirements
for irregular structures (Tables 5.2.3.2 and
5.2.3.3 [4.3-2 and 4.3-3]).
Calculate reliability factor, , and
satisfy limitations for special moment
frame systems (Sec. 5.2.4 [4.3.3]).
(Note that =1.0 for SDC B and C.)
Determine required level of seismic
force analysis (Sec. 5.2.5 [4.4]).
Analyze for minimum lateral
force, F
x =0.01w
x (Sec. 5.2.5.1
[1.5.1]). Go to Chart 2.11.
Go to Chart 2.6
for ELF analysis.
Go to Chart 2.8 for
modal analysis.
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Seismically isolated?
Go to Chart 2.10.
Yes
Classify the structural framing system and
note R,
0
, and C
d
for later use (Sec.
5.2.2 [4.3.1] and Table 5.2.2 [4.3-1]).
Opt to perform
more involved
analysis?
Go to Chart 2.9 for
response history
analysis.
Yes
No
Yes
[A new "Simplified Design Procedure"
that appears in the Appendix to Chapter 4
may be used in lieu of 2003 Provisions
Chapters 4 and 5 for certain structures.]
Chart 2.5
Structural Design
FEMA 451, NEHRP Recommended Provisions: Design Examples
2-8
Determine total weight, W (Sec. 5.3 [5.2.1]).
Go to Chart 2.11.
Check the first order deformation for stability and
amplify the forces if necessary (Sec. 5.4.6.2 [5.2.6.2]).
Determine the story drifts. A re-analysis based upon
a period larger than the upper limit is permitted for
calculating deformations (Sec. 5.4.6.1 [5.2.6.1]).
To determine the internal forces, perform a linear elastic analysis with an
appropriate distribution of forces within stories due to the relative lateral stiffnesses
of vertical elements and diaphragms (Sec. 5.4.4 [5.2.4]). Include appropriately
amplified (Sec. 5.4.4.3 [5.2.4.3]) inherent (Sec. 5.4.4.1 [5.2.4.1]) and accidental
torsions (Sec. 5.4.4.2 [5.2.4.2]). Calculate the overturning moments for all stories
and apply the permitted reduction for foundations (Sec. 5.4.5 [5.2.5]).
Distribute the base shear to the stories
of the building (Sec. 5.4.3 [5.2.3]).
Determine the seismic response coefficient, C
s, (Sec. 5.4.1
[5.2.1.1]) and the total base shear (Eqn. 5.4.1 [5.2-2]).
Determine fundamental period of vibration for the
building (Sec. 5.4.2 [5.2.2]). Carefully note the upper
limit placed on periods calculated from analytical
models of the structure (Table 5.4.2 [5.2-1]).
Consider
soil-structure-interaction?
(Optional)
Go to Chart 2.7 to
calculate reduced
base shear.
Yes
No
Chart 2.6
Equivalent Lateral Force (ELF) Analysis
Chapter 2, Guide to Use of the Provisions
2-9
Modal Analysis: Follow SSI procedure
for ELF analysis (Sec. 5.8.2 [5.6.2]) with
these modifications (Sec. 5.8.3 [5.6.3]).
Calculate effective period
using Eq. 5.8.2.1.1-1 [5.6-3].
Point bearing piles? or
Uniform soft soils over a
stiff deposit?
Read foundation damping factor
from Figure 5.8.2.1.2 [5.6-1].
Calculate effective damping using Eq.
5.8.2.1.2-1 [5.6-9]. Effective damping
need not be less than 5 percent of critical.
Calculate reduced base shear, V, per Sec. 5.8.2.1
[5.6-1], which cannot be less than 0.7V.
Revise deflections to include foundation
rotation (Sec. 5.8.2.3 [5.6.2.3]).
Use Eq. 5.8.2.1.2-4 [5.6-10]
to modify foundation
damping factor.
This SSI procedure applies only to the
fundamental mode of vibration (Sec. 5.8.3.1
[5.6.3.1]). Therefore, substitute W
1
for W,
T
1
for T, V
1
for V, etc.
Use Eq. 5.5.4-2 [5.3-2] to calculate W
1
.
Use Eq. 5.8.3.1-2 [5.6-13] to calculate h.
Calculate reduced base shear for
the first mode, V
1
, per Sec.
5.8.3.1 [5.6.3.1], which cannot be
less than 0.7V
1
. Use standard
modal combination techniques
(Sec. 5.8.3.2 [5.6.3.2]).
Yes
No
Return to Chart 2.6. Return to Chart 2.8.
ELF Analysis: Follow this
procedure (Sec. 5.8.2 [5.6.2]).
Calculate the foundation stiffnesses K
y
and K