Dress, and How To Improve It (1897)
Dress, and How To Improve It (1897)
Dress, and How To Improve It (1897)
^
.--m
x^*"
^air
"^^^
-1^
o:
-;?:'/
%''.^\/
^o^"-.-r;--'/
V---"'/
".
<*>> '" .
rA
0^ <^, 'hV '^^o'
H^x.
^'^
^Ao^
>
"
'-'4^"^
'_
^""^
<J>
^ '^^.
*
^r
"^o
^*l<^
ON"
x-?>
"^
A'
vO
^^pV
<.
\^W'
^
..
^^"\->^%
'^^^
.>
s-J^i:-
""^
. ^ /i?^%
'^'^^
.^^'
i'.
""-^-^.^^
/,^fe'v
"^..^<*
.*i5;. %/
:^^-'
^-^-^
4 O
^r-
^oV"
^oV'
.0'
^o*
^^O^
^'o'
i
>
4 o
V
^
'
N?* ,.
-'^_
^^
A^
*^^
',
-^
C
o
c,
_
.
"
" O
'*
>v
>i;
% -t
Dress, and
3-sep2
6
[Co^ .,^ 1967 I
How to
Improve It
BY
Frances Stuart Parker.
Illustrated.
PRICE, $1.00.
DRESS,
HOW
TO
IMPROVE
IT.
BY
Feances Stuart Parker.
"
Clothes, which began in foolishest love
of Ornament, wliat have they not be-
come ! Increased Security and pleasurable
Heat soon followed: but what of these?
Shame, Divine fShame (ScJiacDn, Modesty),
as yet a stranger to the Anthroixiphagxius
bosom, arose there mysteriously uiider
Clothes
: a mystic, grove-encircled shrine
for the Holy in man. Clothes gave us in-
dividuality, distinctions, social polity
;
Clothes have made Men of us ; they are
threatening to make Clothes-screens of
us."Carlyle.
CHICAGO:
Chicago Legiil News Company.
1897.
TO Till-;
TKAniKK's oi' ami;kmc.\,
wii i;i'iii-;i; i.\ I'lii-: im i.ni', riiK
lldMK, OK lllK
SCHOOL.
('iipyrii.'lit. Is'.iT. liy iMi.wrKs Sti-.\i:t I' aiiki-.i:.
m
DRESS, AND HOW TO IMPROVE IT.
CHAPTER I.
CONVICTION AND CONVERSION.
This ])ainphlet is written as an answer to the numberless
questions anil letters received from women all over the land,
the burden of whose crv is,
'
What shall we do to be sav^ed
"
from the bondao:e of clothes? And it is an endeavor on the
part of the writer to tell as plainly as possible what she has
discovered during fifteen years of actual experimentation in
adapting the conventional dress to changing convictions. This
process has been necessarily a difficult one; it was not an easy
matter to make a decided change from the accustomed to the un-
accustomed in dress; the time had not yet come when a woman
could make, not an evolution, but a revolution, and discard-
ing her old dress, step forth clothed in the new, as easily as
the butterfly does from the chrysalis.
Sixteen years ago, I had the good fortune to be a pupil of Pro-
fessor Lewis B. Monroe, Dean of the Boston University School
of Oratory. He was a man who thoi'oughly believed in physical
culture and constantly strove to impress upon his pupils the ne-
cessity of a free and unrestrained use of every muscle in the
body. He crossed the ocean seven times to study the methods
of Delsarte and incidental to that study made liimself thor-
oughly acquainted with all forms of ]>hysical culture.
Thoroughly familiar with the methods of the best French
gymnasiums, a man himself of fine physique, he made everv
one with whom he came in contact, a firm believer that
''
Not
soul hel]is body more, than body soul.'"
The ])upils in his school were instructed in gymnastics, prac-
tising both with and without apparatus, and were given lec-
(-)
tares in anatomy,
physiology and
hyoieno. It was after
listening to one of tliese, given by Dr.
Helen O'Leary,
illus-
trated by a manikin, that I went home and took olT my
corset,
which seemed to my partially
enlightencMl
mind the root of
all bodily evil. Then and there my troubles
began.
1,
under-vest. 2,
under-drawers. 3,
garter. 4, muslin drawers. 5,
chemise. 6,
corset. 7, corset cover. 8,
hose. 9,
bustle. 10, muslin un-
derskirt. 11, muslin petticoat. 12, di-ess waist. 13, overskirt. 14, skirt
of di'ess.*
It did not occur to me that my skirt band still remained,
and that my dress was quite as tight as before, or that the
weio-ht of the skirts still remaining, pressed heavily upon the
abdominal
muscles. I calmly removed ni}^ corsets and de-
prived my weakened muscles of their customary support.
*
This diagram was first published in the New York San of .Viigust 9, 1S91, to illustrate
an article upun the subject of Dress, given by me at Chautauqua during that summer.
(4)
Either the lecturer did not see the necessity for a radical
change of dress throughout, or my mind was incapable of so
advanced a thought; at all events, I brought from the lecture
simply a determination to discard my corsets and give my in-
ternal organs a chance to perform their functions.
In all my experience, I have never met a woman whose cor-
set was tight. I think I must have been the one exception to
w^omankind, for mine certainly was tight at all times, and I
gave its strings an extra pull before donning my better gowns,
and this had gone on without question from early girlhood to
the age of twenty-nine.
That winter, I was wearing the costume universally worn
at that time. It consisted, first, of woolen under-drawers and
vest, white muslin drawers, fastened around the waist by a
band; and, in regular order, chemise, corset, corset-cover, un-
derskirt, bustle, dress-skirt, over-skirt and basque. Seven
bands around the waist, besides the stiff, shield-like corset,
which prevented the complete severance of the diaphragm,
and lifted the weight somewhat from the abdomen.
If any sensible woman will turn her attention from the
trim, well-rouuded waist she now admires, long enough to
consider the true inwardness of that waist, it will surely, as it
did me,
"
give her pause."
Au aroused consciousness kept my interior conditions vividly
(5)
before me
"
It is as unworthy them as submission to English tyranny would have
been on the part of our fathers. More injurious, also, as it threatens the
ruin of all physical vigor for the generations yet to come. But I am com-
forted in this matter by the growing attention to i)h}'sical exercise and de-
velopmentwhich must necessitate a more healthful style of dressand
which Heaven and all good women forbid to be o}dy a passing fashion !
"
Mrs. Alice Freeman Palmer, says:" Women need no other one thing so
much as freedom of movement in dress."
Mrs. Mary A. Livermore, writes
simple forms for heavy goods, and gathers for thin materials.
5. The costume should be genuine tiiroughout. If made
(45)
of two materials, its prototype would be the gowns of the
earl V
mitldle ages, one worn over another. If there is ])ar(lon-
able simulation, that simulation should be consistent; i. c,
where oiK^ material seems to be that of au undergarment (like
the guimj)e), it should apj)ear to be au undergarment, every
time that particular material appears.
0. The decoration of the gown should be subordinated to
the o'own itself; the ornament should sei've, or seem to serve,
the pui'poses of strengthening the edges, uniting the parts, or
holding together.
7. TIu gown should be suited to the personality of the
wearer, in color, texture and form.
nilJDS, WIX(iS AND FEATUEES EMPLOYED AS OARXITUKE.
Fi'om the school room there should certainly emanate a sen-
timent which would discourage forever the slaughter of birds
for ornament.
The use of birds and their })luuuige is as inartistic as it is
cruel and barbarous.
TUF, IIAI.O.
'
One London dealer in l)irds received, when the fashion was
at its height, a single consignment of thirty-two thousand dead
humming birds, and another received, at one time, thirty thou-
sand aquatic birds and three hundred thousand ])airs of
wings."
Tliinlc what a price to pay,
Fai-es so briglit and gay,
Just for a hat
!
Flowers uiivisited, mornings unsung,
Sea-ranges bare of the wings that o'erswung,