Federal Grants and Cannabis Lobbying
Federal Grants and Cannabis Lobbying
Federal Grants and Cannabis Lobbying
Watchdog.org
1229 King Street,3 rd floor
Alexandria, Virginia 22314
Hello,
In 2012 Washington State passed Initiative 1-502. After the Initiative had passed it was
discovered through public access laws in December of 2014 that the Washington State Liquor
Control board travelled around the State of Washington and held 17 secret meetings with law
enforcement and treatment professionals.
Aside from the fact that these acts violated the Washington State Open Public Meetings Act, it is
now clear that many of these law enforcement and treatment organizations were receiving
federal grants which by law may have prohibited them from lobbying and distributing
information.
However, that is what happened here in Washington State on a grand scale, and the U.S.
Attorneys for Washington were both aware of these events where many other federal agencies
also attended these secret public meetings.
I believe that this situation may be the worst violation of 18 U.S. Code 1913 - Lobbying with
appropriated moneys, in United States history. Numerous grant receiving entities may have
violated 18 U.S. Code 1913, in a desperate attempt to save their respective jobs which were
obviously on the line here in Washington State after the passage ofl-502, the marijuana
legalization initiative.
As many of you know we are a nation of laws that have to be applied evenly and fairly if the
public confidence is to be kept intact. While it may be uncomfortable for some in Congress to
hold these entities involved accountable to the law, it is in fact a law and it should be upheld
regardless of your feelings on the issues of marijuana or drug abuse. These people signed federal
grants under a declaration that federal grant monies would not be: used directly or indirectly to
pay for any personal service, advertisement, telegram, telephone, letter, printed or written matter,
or other device, intended or designed to influence in any manner a Member of Congress, a
jurisdiction, or an official of any government, to favor, adopt, or oppose, by vote or otherwise,
any legislation, law, ratification, policy, or appropriation, whether before or after the introduction
of any bill, measure, or resolution proposing such legislation, law, ratification, policy, or
appropriation;
of any bill, measure, or resolution proposing such legislation, law, ratification, policy, or
appropriation;
Now, after meeting with the Washington State Liquor Control Board on 17 different occasions
and perhaps more, the following federal grant recipients are subject to the provisions of 18 U.S.
Code 1913:
Northwest HIDTA
Spokane County Multi-Jurisdictional Drug Task Force
LEAD Multi-Jurisdictional Drug Task Force.
Substance Abuse Prevention of Clark County
Washington Association for Substance Abuse violence Prevention
Washington State Prevention Enhancement (SPE)
The following federal grant recipient sent employees employed by programs which were
receiving federal funding:
Washington State Patrol- lAD Division (In charge or Multi-Jurisdictional Drug Task
Forces)
The reality is the Washington State Liquor Control Board enabled many federal grant recipients
to circumvent their statement of assurances which they signed agreeing not to use federal grant
funding for lobbying purposes. I would not at all surprise me if the same thing happened in
Colorado, Alaska, or DC.
Please hold these federal grant recipients accountable for their violations of federal laws.
PS.
It has been argued and won in Federal court that state employees Wlder federal grants are subject
to the Westfall Act, and subject to the Federal Tort Claims Act as a "loaned state employee" or
"Borrowed servant." They can't have it both ways. The Loaned employee's violated 18 U.S.
Code 1913: Please check for their reporting.
http://www.ioos.noaa.gov/library/grantsgovsflll.pdf
Thank you
~\}j~l-1
John Worthington
4500 SE 2ND PL
Renton W A.98059
Briefly spoke on two current issues - I) control ofillicit drugs. and 2) medical
marijuana not covered in 1-502
Rules must be put together by December I, 2013 - not required to have the stores
open by then but the public expects it
Ruthann
13-2-01603-3 LeB
----------------~---------,
.--.~--,.------
'~---------
Marijuana smuggling from Canada seems to have decreased cut in reality it bas
moved farther east before entering the U.S.
Street dealers will unden:ut the state costs. plus no taxes and only a hand-slap
from the couns
Drug dealers are hiding behind the medical marijuana "authorization"
200 WSU students (18-22 years ofage) have medical marijuana "authorization"
o
Investigation showed a member ofNORML set-up a clinic at a ht-bouse and for
$200 cash the marijuana practitioner would issue an "authorization"
No way 1502 and current medical marijuana laws will wode together
What to do with theftlburglaries at marijuana stores
o
Justin commented on discussion around a "gun store" model
I-S02 does not iO()lude open marijuana containers in a vehicle
There has been an increase in public consumption of marijuana
How do you address the issue of agencies funded or partially funded by federal
money
How many marijuana grows are anticipated
o
It will be based on estimated consumption rate
o
Possibly modeled after the former liquor store model of350 stores
Nothing in 1-502 allows for money back to law enforcement agencies like the
liquor laws
Laws need to back the packaging. labeling, etc.
Will the marijuana stores be allowed to be armed
Where are we going to be in 10 years
o
Medical marijuana was enacted 10+ years ago and it's still not right
mc
SLL:sll
13-2-01603-3 LeB
As I mentioned in our meeting last Thursday. Liquor Control Board Chair, Sharon
Foster, asked me to offer the lE professionals of Snohomish County the opportunity
hear from the Board and to hear your comments on the implementation of 1-502.
Obviously, the input from Sno-County law enforcement would be of great value to us
as we move closer to our December 1It deadline.
At this point I am just trying to get an idea as to the level of interest. If you think a
one-hour law enforcement forum with the Board would be a valuable to you, I will set
something up in the Everett area. All! need for now is an e-mail reply from you
wheth,Pr you or your staff would be interested in attending a short forum
tbi
~. I appreciate your consideration and I look forward to hearing back.
with
The Board would like to meet on the same day as one of our public forums. On
February 19th we have scheduled a public forum in Mount Vemon. I could try to set
something up in Everett area for early afternoon.
http://www.liq.wa.gov/publicationsfrules12012%20Proposed%20RuleslNotice-to-stakeho
Iders-12-26-MJ-producer-license-and-requirements--CR101.pdf
http://www.liq.W8.govtpublicationslMarijuanall-502lFact-Sheet-I-502-REVISED-11-19-1
2.pdf
WSlCB logo.gif
Northwest Region
13-2-D1603-3lCB
Trotter. Samantha E.
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Follow Up Flag;
Flag 8httus:
Follow up
Completed
Pat Kohler
2.
Rick Garza
3.
Sharon Foster
4.
Chris Marr
5.
Ruthann Kurose
6.
Brian Smith
7.
Alan Rathbun
8.
Justin Nordhom
9.
Steve Johnson
13-2-01803-3 LeB
Sunnyside PO
2.
WA State Patrol
3.
Wapato PO
4.
5.
6.
Mabton PO
7.
Toppenish PO
8.
Connell PO
9.
Pasco PO
10. Richland PO
11. West Richland PO
12. Tieton PO
13. Selah PO
14. Yakima PO
15. LEAD (drug task force)
13--2-01603--3 Lee
00000651
Suggest a pharrnacy-styte system like the one used for ephedrine purchases
o It should be handled like alcohol and not placed into a person's property upon being
booked
Reservation grows is why Yakima County leads the state in illegal outdoor grows
So far the Feds are saying, " ... not in federal buildings, on federal land, etc."
13-2..01603--3 Lee
00000652
-.--.-.-----..
~---.-----~-.----.-~.-
o City ordinance can be adopted but packages need to not be re-sealable; like
alcohol, once open the seal is broken
\-502 does not address medical marijuana
SLL:slI
13-2-01603-3 LeB
.....
---------~.--~---- .
-"-'-'-'--"-
..
--.-.~
....-
.._--.....
- - - _..
-"--.~.
The Enforcement & Education Division's personnel carry out their duties with the
highest standards ofpersonal and professional ethics based on honesty, Integrity and
trust. Every individual who comes in contact with 8 division employee is to be treated
with the highest level of courtesy and respect.
Will you work with your regional captains on a strategy for outreach to the law
?
enforcement in the location of the forums.
?
If appropriate, please include surrounding citiesltownslcounties. Olympia and
Seattle aren't necessary, but the remaining four are in play.
?
We would need one law enforcement agency the host the hour..Jong
discussion. We'll also need to coordinate with the other activities going on that day.
13-2-01603-3 Lea
00000680
_ _ _
""0"
. _
~.
_ _ "
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject.:
RE: 1-502 Law Enforcement ForlJ'n with the Uquor control Board Members
Tom
It was good to meet you at the Chiefs meeting~ You asked me to follow up on this issue;
below are just a few of my observations. My contact information is at the bottom of this
message.
Because legalization of Marijuana has not been allowed in any US state or territory we
are breaking new ground. Colorado enacted strict regulations regarding their Marijuana
dispensaries but there was still considerable diversion to the illegal market Some of
their restrictions involved the location and size of their dispensaries, background on
dispensary operators, barcoding of their plants. no advertising. etc. ( see attachment for
issues surrounding dispensaries ). All of these issues should be addressed in any rule
making. Also many dispensaries, particularty in Califomia, have been involved with
Money laundering because it is a cash business with no audits.
I believe it would be preferable to develop a nonprofit model similar to the State Liquor
stores that would be subject to State oversight and regular audits. All contracted
emptoyees would be subject to a strid background check; no criminal violations and
polygraph on demand. All stores. processing and production sites should have security
cameras and guards and all losses of money or product reported immediately to law
enforcement There should also be 'a residency requirement to reduce out of state drug
tourism.
Below are other issues raised by WASAVP; the key one being the repeal of the Medical
Marijuana Statute that would eliminate a big headache for law enforcement,
The Washington Association for Substance Abuse and Violence Prevention ~ASAVP)
is developing a white paper addressing the implementation of 1-502 which should be
finalized in the next few weeks. Among the issues and recommendations to be
addressed:
13-2"(}1603-3lCB
Dave Rodriguez
Director NW HIDTA
300 Fifth Avenue, 13111 Fir.
Seattle, WA 98104
(206) 352-3600
{HYPERUNK -mailto:dmdriguez@nw.hidta.org"}
13-2-01603-3 Lee
00000678
217/13
20/1
The risk of heart attack is five times higher than usual in the hour after smoking
Weekly marijuana use doubles the risk of developing depression and triples the incidence
of suicidal thoughts amongst youth. Drug Abuse: Drug Czar, Others Warn parenls thai
Teen Marijuana Use can Lead to Depression" Life Science Weekly. May 31. 2()05
Critical skills related to attention. memory and learning are significantly impaired among
marijuana users. even after 24 hours have passed since the last use. NIDA. "Research
Drivers who have used marijuana are more than twice as likely as other drivers to be
involved in car crashes. Epidemiologic Review.f, . Marijuana use and Motor Vehic:Je
Vancouver. WA 98661
360-750-7500 x144
w_.preventdarkcounty.o'1
13-2-01603-3 Lea
00000114
~~~---
-~-------
PREVENT! recognizes that there are complicated legal and social issues surrounding
marijuana use and abuse. PREVENT! believes that treatment and prevention efforts must
address the social and psychological reasons that youth use marijuana.. as well as advocating for
responsible laws that limit youth exposure and access to marijuana. We support appropriate
mandated responsible vendor programs. and other protective measures which can help protect
kids and communities. Below is a list of recommendations 'We support. This list was created in
partnership with the Washington Association for Substance Abuse and Violence Prevention.
Increase FundiD' for Pr......SDtioD to the Division of Behavioral Health and Recovery.
abuse prevention.
Increase FUDm, for Substance Abu" Treatment including funding for school-based
Districts for every Middle and High School to keep kids off marijuana and ready to learn.
Bestriet Optlet Density to minimize exposure ofyouth to marijuana products and/or use.
neighborhoods.
Mariiu.a Soeial Ho.t LaWI to prevent youth marijuana use in homes and unmonitored
house parties.
Mandatory R.esDODsible Vendor Trainin& for all licensed vendors and medical marijuana
providers.
Vancouver. WA 98661
360-750-7500 xl44
w_.preventclarkcountv.ors
13-2-01603-3 Lea
00000115
e Increase Funding for Liquor Control Board Enforcement so more than 2S additional
officers are in place for enforcement of the entire industry; including enough to
e1asrwe Funding for Law Enforcement for training and additional statfto adequately
enforce driving under the influence of drugs (DUID) laws and for equipment for court
e Greater Ipdustry-Flnapced Fund from marijuana profits to pay for the health-related
costs among the adolescents, including an increased need for diversion programs and
structure, that permanently protects it from being transferred into any other fund
e A Penalty Fee on the marijuana industry for every new underage user.
e Repeal or Reform "Medical" Marijuana Law to reduce youth access from personal
legalization, reduces IN502 tax revenue, and jeopardizes 1-502 adolescent harm reduction
e Marijuana Controlled by the Food and Drug Administration like tobacco is now.
13-2-01603-3 LeB
00000116
Thank you for your time and consideration ofthese suggestions. We look forward to
partnering with the WA State Liquor Control Board in this process ofrulemaking for the
Sincerely,
PREVENT! Coalition
w_.preyenttlarkcounty.Ofg
13-2"()1603-3 lea
00000117
From:
To:
Will do!
Randy, please assign someone to be our agency's representative to help the lCB shape their marijuana
policy on 1-502.
Agency Motto:
HI, just a reminder that you're receiving this email because you have expressed an Interest In TOGETHER!.
Don't forget to add jcooperOthurstontogether.org to your address book so we'll be sure to land in your
inbox!
You may unsubSCribe If you no longer wish to receive our ernalls.
II
implementing the new marijuana laws in ow: state. We're treading new ground here and a lot
of policies have to be created. And you can be a part of the ruleroaking process! There are
many ways to do this.
First, you can attend. an LCD public forum.. One is scheduled for this Tuesday, Jan.
22, at 6 p.m. at the LCB main office (3000 Pacific Ave SE, Room 201; Olympia, WA
98501). Depending on your interest in the issue, you can attend just to listen to the
ideas being presented, or you can speak and offer your own thoughts. Here's a page
with more infoanariop and the full agenda. TOGETHER! staff will be there to testify.
(See below for a few points we'll be addressing.)
Another thing you can do is provide written commen1S to the LCB via email or fax
(360-664-9689). The deadline for written comments is Feb. 10.
And to make sure you always get the latest news on what's happening with marijuana
at the LCB, s~ up for their listsery.
Let me know if you have any questionsl Wf! hope to see you Tuesday at the forum.
P.s. Having good infoonation is key to successful and appropriate policies, and to being an
engaged citizen. Please look at this data sheet. which shows teen marijuana use statistics in
Washington state. And bdow .is a list of provisions drafted by one ofTOGETHER!'s partners
that we fed promote healthy children and communities in a legal marijuana marketplace.
Happy reading and learning!
We know you share a common thread with us of caring deeply for the youth in our community
and making sure they have successful futures. Washington State Healthy Youth SnnTt~y data
illustrate that the perception of harm from regular marijuana use is steadily declining, while
marijuana use among teens continues to climb. Marijuana use is detrimental to proper youth
development and achievement.
Here is a list of provisions to promote healthy children and communities in a legal marijuana
marketplace. These are what guide us in our approach to this issue.
l'.OGBTHER! website
Upcoming events
TOGETHERI engages and mobilizes families, schools and the community to advance the
health, safety and success ofour youth. Our vision is for all young people in Thurston
County communities to be supported, healthy, safe and valued.
To learn. more, visit us online or call us at 360-493-2230.
Bob Ferguson
December 3, 2014
The Office of the Attomey Ge:oe:ral C'AG<n appreciatm the opportunity to submit these
comments on a set ofproposed administrative rules by d1e Washington State Liquor Control
Board ("WSLCB,,). In pa:rticular~ we are providing comments on proposed amended WAC 314
55-077. We include with, and as a part of; our commc:nts the attached September 1,2014 issue
paper from the Washington Healthy Yoath Coalition to 1be SPB (SUategic Prevention
Euhancoment) Polier Consortium. captioned "Poliey Options Regarding Marijuana Products That
. Appeal To Kids."
Introdgction.
AJJ, the issue paper notes, the Governor's Resul1s Washington initiative calla for the state to
decrease the percentage of 10 gradas who report usin& marijuana in the last 30 days from the
2012 baseHne of 19.3% to 18%.by 2017, as measured by tbe Washington State Healthy Youth
Survey. The state's effort to reduce youth marijuana use is ocwr:ring in a particularly
cbalJenging envimoment. For several years prior to the passage ofI-S02,. youth marijuana use in
washingtOn was on the r.iae. According to the Washington State Hcal1hy Youth Survey
("HYS,,), "Among Orade 10 and 12 students, thae were significat increasing 1reOds in 30-day
marijuana use from 2002-2012.,,1 Moreo.er, youth perception of harm from marijuana use
bisJorlcally a leading indicator of actual use--decralsed signifieamly fiom 2002-2012 among all
.113.
"Id. atM.
3JW: 15--2-00069-9
----
----------------
1
2
1. The 1ams ":relate," Itin relation to, It or "relating to" mean din:cdy or indirectly referring to,
pertaining to. discussing, describing, c.ommenting on. eoostitotiog, evidencing. referencing. comprising.
or reflecting upon Illdatcd subjeet, in whole or in part.
1. The term ~ refers to 10m WOIthiagton.
v. INTERROGATORIES
4
5
6
7
8
10
GENE.RAL O.B.J.EC'nONS: This set' of1nterrogatarles are directed to the Washington State
A.ttnmey General'1 Office and to "Robert Farris". Defendants believe plaintiff meat1S to refer to
Robert or"R.ustt' Fal~ an employee oftbe A.ttnmey Generars Office. Neither the Attorney
Ocneral's Office nor Mr. Fallis are parties to this case, 1bns interrogatories aod requests for
production ofdoctulients are not properly served on the AGO or Mr. Fallis. Mr. Fallis is not an
agent o~ or represadative of.. the Washington State IJquor Control Board. 1.'berefore,
Defi:ndanb ate under DO obligation to respond to these interrogatories. Furthermore. as they are
directed to non-parti~ Defendants do DOt waive objections to improper service of the 3td Set of
Interrogatories and R~ for Production. Plain.ti.frs Declaration of Service is also improper,
because it ~ the 3 Set of Interrogatories and Request for Production were "served on the
defendants listed below." The only entity "listed beloW' on tbe Declaration nfService is the
Attorney Oeraeral's ~ which is not a party to this action. Furthermore, 1be Interrogatories
and R.eqoest for P!txIuction ofI>ocume:oDl are not reasonably calculated to lead 10 discovery of
11
12
relevant evidence.
13
Without waiving objection, Senior Counsel Robert Fallis provides the following responses:
14
INTERROGATORY NO.1: Have you ch:afted any policy for "the 1-502 rule making process as
part ofa team or group?
ANSWER.: No. I am an attt:nneJ employed by the Attorney General's om" as Senior CounseL
I am not part oftbe r':'502 rulemaking process nor do I advise the Liquor Control Board on
matters relating to 1-502. I have not drafted any policy 1br the 1-502 rulema1cing process.
15
16
11
18
19
20
21
22
'
I was the primary drafter ofwritteD. comments on proposed changes to WAC 314-55-077 on
paclc!ging of marij1ll.lDa products that the AUomey General's OffiCe su.bmiUed to the Liquor
Control Board ("LCD") on December 3, 2014.
.
As the AtbJmey Oenaal's Office representative on the Waah:iDgton Healthy Youth CoaJition
(fOllIlCl"ly known as the R.edooin& Underage DrinJdng Task Force)~ I was tbD primary drafter of
an issue paper regarding matijuaDa products that potentjal1y appeal to ldds. The issue paper,
titled "Policy Options R.egmding Marijuana Products ~ Appeal to Kids". dated September I,
2014s was,Submitted to the Stmtegic Prevention Enbaaeemeut ("SPEt') Policy Consortium of the
state ofWashington.
23
- - - -_ _ _- -
24
lNTERROOATORY NO.2; Iftbe IJllS\Vel' to interrogatory number 1 is yes, please identify every ,
membei- of your team. or group by indivi.d:ual and by organization.
25
26
ANSWER: I have not drafted any policy for the 1-502 rulemaking process. The Answer to this
queStion is Not Applicable. I am. not a member ofa team or- group that dJ:afted any policy for the