Emperical Design of Concrete Masonry
Emperical Design of Concrete Masonry
Emperical Design of Concrete Masonry
TEK 14-8B
EMPIRICAL DESIGN OF
CONCRETE MASONRY WALLS
Structural
Table 12006 IBC Empirical Design Limitations Based on Building Height and Basic Wind SpeedA
Building height,
h, ft (m)
w < 90
(w < 40)
110 < w
(49 < w)
Not allowed
Not allowed
Not allowed
Not allowed
Not allowed
Not allowed
Not allowed
(2008)
l
t
h
l
t1
t2
Single wythe
Double wythe
(Note: t = t1 + t2 )
t
= nominal wall thickness
t1, t2 = nominal wythe thicknesses
Maximum wall length-to Wall thickness, in. (mm) 6 (152) 8 (203) 10 (254) 12 (305)
thickness or height-to Bearing walls
Construction (unreinforced)
thickness ratioA
Solid or solid grouted 10 (3.0)B 13.3 (4.1) 16.6 (5.1) 20 (6.1)
Bearing walls
All other
9 (2.7)B 12 (3.7) 15 (4.5) 18 (5.5)
Solid units or solid grouted
20
Nonbearing walls
All others
18
Exterior
9 (2.7) 12 (3.7) 15 (4.5) 18 (5.5)
Nonbearing walls
Interior
18 (5.5) 24 (7.3) 30 (9.1) 36 (11)
Exterior
18
Cantilever WallsC
Interior
36
Solid
3 (0.9) 4 (1.2) 5 (1.5) 6 (1.8)
Cantilever wallsB
Hollow
2 (0.6) 2.6 (0.8) 3.3 (1.0) 4 (1.2)
Solid
6
Parapets C
1.5 (0.5) 2 (0.6) 2.5 (0.8) 3 (0.9)
Hollow
4
A
Note that Ref. 6 includes modified requirements for walls
Parapets (8-in. (203-mm) thick min.)B
3
with openings.
A
Ratios are determined using nominal dimensions. For multi- B Unreinforced 6-in. (152-mm) thick bearing walls are limited
wythe walls where wythes are bonded by masonry headers, to one story in height.
the thickness is the nominal wall thickness. When multiwythe C For these cases, spans are maximum wall heights.
walls are bonded by metal wall ties, the thickness is taken
as the sum of the wythe thicknesses. Note that Reference 6
includes modified requirements for walls with openings.
check the SDC and basic wind speed, with the 2006 IBC, to
B
The ratios are maximum height-to-thickness ratios and do
use empirical design the designer must check:
not limit wall length.
SDC,
the wall's vertical cross-sectional area and spaced not more
basic wind speed,
than 48 in. (1,219 mm) apart).
building height, and
In addition, buildings that rely on empirically designed
location of gravity loads resultant.
masonry walls for lateral load resistance are allowed up to 35
The limitations based on SDC are the same as in the 2003
ft (10.7 m) in height.
IBC, described above. Building height and basic wind speed
The 2003 IBC restricts empirical design to locations where
conditions where empirical design is permitted under the 2006
the basic wind speed (three-second gust, not fastest mile) is
IBC are summarized in Table 1.
less than or equal to 110 mph (79 m/s), as defined in Minimum
The 2006 IBC also requires the resultant of gravity loads
Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, ASCE 7
to fall within the kern of the masonry element, to avoid im(ref. 3). A wind speed of this velocity generally applies along
parting tension to the element. This area is defined as: within
the East and Gulf coasts of the United States.
the center third of the wall thickness, or, for foundation piers,
The 2006 IBC further refines the empirical design limiwithin the central area bounded by lines at one-third of each
tations. Whereas with the 2003 IBC, the designer need only
cross-sectional dimension of the pier.
DESIGN PROVISIONS
Lateral Support
Lateral support for walls can be provided in the horizontal
direction by cross walls, pilasters, buttresses and structural
frame members, or in the vertical direction by floor diaphragms,
roof diaphragms and structural frame members, as illustrated
in Figure 1. For empirically designed walls, such support must
be provided at the maximum intervals given in Tables 2 and 3.
Note that the span limitations apply to only one direction; that
is, the span in one direction may be unlimited as long as the
span in the other direction meets the requirements of Tables
2 or 3.
Allowable Stresses
Allowable stresses in empirically designed masonry due
to building code prescribed vertical (gravity) dead and live
loads (excluding wind or seismic) are given in Table 4.
Table 4 includes two sets of compressive stresses for
hollow concrete masonry units (CMU). The first set, titled
"Hollow Unit Masonry (Units Complying With ASTM C 9006 or Later)" apply to most CMU currently available. The
2006 edition of the CMU specification, Standard Specification
for Loadbearing Concrete Masonry Units, ASTM C 90 (ref.
7), included slightly reduced minimum face shell thickness
requirements for CMU 10 in. (254 mm) and greater in width.
These smaller face shells require a corresponding adjustment
to the allowable compressive stresses. The values currently
published in the 2006 IBC ("Hollow Unit Masonry (Units
Complying With Previous Editions of ASTM C 90)" in Table
4), apply to the previous face shell thicknesses, and should
only be used if the CMU to be used have the thicker face shells
Alternate courses
intersect as shown
Loadbearing walls
Metal lath below or wide
screen over cores to
support grout fill
Joint reinforcement
at 8 in. (203 mm)
max. vertical
spacing - W 1.7
(MW 11) min.
longitudial wire size
Loadbearing walls
Control joint
rake and caulk
Grouted cores
Steel connectors at 48 in.
(1.2 m) o.c. max. vertically.
24 in. (610 mm) min. length
and min. section 1/4 x 1 1/2 in.
(6.4 x 38 mm)
Loadbearing walls
Note: Other metal ties, joint reinforcement or anchors may be used, provided they are spaced to provide an equivalent area of anchorage.
Figure 2Empirical Anchorage Requirements for Lateral Support of Intersecting Masonry Walls
Unit notched at
joist, solid or
filled at joist
location
Fill with concrete
masonry units
between joists
Solid or filled
concrete masonry
unit, notched at
joist
1
Mesh or other
grout stop device
Roof diaphragmsC
Lx
x1
y1
x2
x3
y3
Ly
Do not include wall sections
with openings or any element
whose length is less than onehalf its height.
y2
x4
x5
y4
x6
In x-direction,
cumulative shear wall length = lx1 + lx2 + ... + lxn
In y-direction,
cumulative shear wall length = ly1 + ly2 + ... + lyn
In each direction, cumulative shear wall length must exceed
the larger of 0.4Lx and 0.4Ly B
A
Maximum length-to-width
ratio of diaphragm panel
5:1
4:1
3:1
2:1
2:1
Bonding with
masonry header
Lintels
Lintels are designed as reinforced beams, using either the
allowable stress design or the strength design provisions of
Building Code Requirements for Masonry Structures. End
bearing must be at least 4 in. (102 mm), although 8 in. (203
mm) is typical.
Pc d 2
p the lesser of h 2 and d 3
Pc
h
p
p
Pc
a
t
Pc
Solid walls
Where:
a = air space thickness
d = nominal unit thickness
(specified
thickness plus the
thickness of one
mortar joint)
h = nominal unit height
(specified
height
plus the thickness
of one mortar joint)
Pc = allowable total horizontal projection
of corbelling
p = allowable projection of each unit
t = nominal wall thickness
Support on Wood
Empirically designed masonry is not permitted to
be supported by wood girders or other forms of
wood construction, due to expected deformations
in wood from deflection and moisture, causing
distress in the masonry, and due to potential safety
implications in the event of fire.
Compressible filler
in open joint, 1 2 to
1 in. (13 to 25 mm)
Corbelling
When corbels are not designed using allowable
stress design or strength design, they may be
detailed using the empirical requirements shown
in Figure 6. Only solid or solidly grouted masonry
units may be used for corbelling.
EMPIRICALLY DESIGNED
PARTITION WALLS
In many cases, the building structure is designed using traditional engineered methods, such
as strength design or allowable stress design, but the interior
nonloadbearing masonry walls are empirically designed. In
these cases, the partition walls are supported according to the
provisions listed in Tables 2 and 3, but it is important that the
support conditions provide isolation between the partition walls
and the building's structural elements to prevent the building
loads from being transferred into the partition. The anchor, or
other support, must provide the required lateral support for the
partition wall while also allowing for differential movement.
This is in contrast to the "Anchorage for Lateral Support"
section, which details anchorage requirements to help ensure
Clip angles at 4
ft (1.2 m) o.c.,
attached to
concrete deck,
but not to wall
REFERENCES
1. International Building Code. International Code Council, 2003 and 2006.
2. Allowable Stress Design of Concrete Masonry Foundation Walls, TEK 15-1B. National Concrete Masonry Association,
2001.
3. Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, ASCE 7-02. New York, NY: American Society of Civil Engineers,
2002.
4. Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, ASCE 7-05. New York, NY: American Society of Civil Engineers,
2005.
5. Masonry Designer's Guide, 5th Edition. Council for Masonry Research and The Masonry Society, 2007.
6. Building Code Requirements for Masonry Structures, ACI 530-08/ASCE 5-08/TMS 402-08. Reported by the Masonry Standards Joint Committee, 2008.
7. Standard Specification for Loadbearing Concrete Masonry Units, ASTM C 90-06. ASTM International, Inc., 2006.
8. Building Code Requirements for Masonry Structures, ACI 530/ASCE 5/TMS 402. Reported by the Masonry Standards Joint
Committee, 2002 and 2005.
9. Anchors and Ties for Masonry, TEK 12-1A. National Concrete Masonry Association, 2008.
10. Floor and Roof Connections to Concrete Masonry Walls, TEK 5-7A. National Concrete Masonry Association, 2001.
Provided by:
NCMA and the companies disseminating this technical information disclaim any and all responsibility and liability for the
accuracy and the application of the information contained in this publication.
NATIONAL CONCRETE MASONRY ASSOCIATION
13750 Sunrise Valley Drive, Herndon, Virginia 20171
www.ncma.org