2007 04 AirportInnovation NewPLanningModels
2007 04 AirportInnovation NewPLanningModels
2007 04 AirportInnovation NewPLanningModels
Airport Cities
& the Aerotropolis:
New Planning Models
An interview with Dr. John D. Kasarda
106
Aeroports de Paris established a real estate division in 2003 to act as the developer, general
contractor and construction project owner and manager of landside commercial properties at Paris
Charles de Gaulle and Orly international airports.
Dallas-Forth Worths management is aggressively expanding its real estate development business,
leasing its vast airport land to a wide variety of commercial tenants, including oil and natural gas
exploration.
Hong Kong International Airports SkyCity is a one million square meter retail, exhibition, business
office, and hotel and entertainment complex near its passenger terminal. The first major phase opened
in late 2006. (See Figure 1)
Kuala Lumpur International Airports new airport city is commercially anchored by its large Gateway
Park that, in addition to retail and office development, includes motor sports, an automotive
hypermarket and leisure venues drawing on the local as well as aviation-induced market.
Incheons AirCity encompasses international business areas, logistics zones, shopping and tourism
districts, as well as housing and services for airport city workers and residents.
Dubai World Central is a $32 billion airport city under development 25 miles south of downtown
Dubai. Cornerstoned by a massive multimodal air logistics hub, the airport city will include office
towers, hotels, a mega mall, golf course and housing for 40,000 on-site workers. Its airport, commercial
and residential zones will be connected by an internal light rail system.
Amsterdam Schiphol, through its Schiphol Real Estate Group, has been involved for two decades in
landside commercial development. These developments include office complexes, hotels, meeting
and entertainment facilities, logistics parks, shopping and other commercial activities branded under
the AirportCity name. (See Figure 2) Nearly 58,000 people are employed at Schiphol, which integrates
multimodal transportation, regional corporate headquarters, shopping, logistics and exhibition space
to form a major economic growth pole for the Dutch economy.
Numerous other international airports, not quite the scale of Amsterdam Schiphol or Seouls Incheon,
have given the airport city model high priority in their master planning and strategic development
(e.g., Brisbane, Calgary, Vienna, Zurich), positively affecting their financial bottom line.
In fact, many airports today receive greater percentages of their revenues from non-aeronautical
sources than from aeronautical sources (e.g., landing fees, gate leases, passenger service changes).
These non-aeronautical revenues have become pivotal to airports meeting their facility modernization
and infrastructure expansion needs, along with their being cost-competitive in attracting and retaining
airlines.
How have airport non-aeronautical revenues grown over the years?
ACI has estimated, based on historic benchmarks from International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO)
airport financial data, that non-aeronautical revenues constituted approximately 30 percent of total
airport revenues in 1990. ACIs economic surveys have shown that non-aeronautical revenues rose
to 46 percent in 1995, to 51 percent in 2000, and to a record 54 percent last year. For some large
airports, such as Atlantas Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport, non-aeronautical revenues now
exceed 60 percent of their total revenues. Airport retail and, in particular, parking have become huge
cash cows.
What about revenue sources in the years ahead?
Numerous airport managers with whom I have interacted have stressed that they will be increasingly
dependent on revenue derived from non-aeronautical sources in the future. With airports under
pressure by airlines and passengers to keep aeronautical costs under control, increasing nonaeronautical revenues pose the primary means by which airports will be able to meet their financial
and growth needs. In fact, most do not see expanding non-aeronautical revenues as an option, but
as a necessity.
It is my further view that these non-aeronautical revenue-generating activities especially retail will
increasingly take place on airport land beyond the terminal. This is because: 1) terminals are basically
planned and built according to aeronautical needs; 2) most terminals have restricted operations hours
due to aircraft noise constraints; and 3) security issues tend to pose limits (e.g., limiting shopping
locations of meeters and greeters). Other space constraints of terminals will limit the amount of retail
and other non-aeronautical economic activities there, pushing these activities further out landside as
the airport develops.
107
108
John Kasarda, Ph.D is Kenan Distinguished Professor of Management at the University of North Carolinas KenanFlagler Business School. He advises airports and governments around the world on airport city and aerotropolis
planning, and serves as Chairman of Insight Medias annual Airport Cities conference. For those desiring elaboration
of his points in this interview, see The Rise of the Aerotropolis, in The Next American City, issue ten/2006, The New
Business Model, in Airport World Magazine, August 2006, and www.aerotropolis.com.
110