Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 5 views

    Venable v. NC Department Corr, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case involving a plaintiff appealing a district court's denial of relief on a civil rights complaint against a state department of corrections. The appeals court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the lower court's decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    Venable v. NC Department Corr, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    This document is a court case involving a plaintiff appealing a district court's denial of relief on a civil rights complaint against a state department of corrections. The appeals court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the lower court's decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-10-29 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 97-7102

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document is a court case involving a plaintiff appealing a district court's denial of relief on a civil rights complaint against a state department of corrections. The appeals court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the lower court's decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    5 views2 pages

    Venable v. NC Department Corr, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case involving a plaintiff appealing a district court's denial of relief on a civil rights complaint against a state department of corrections. The appeals court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the lower court's decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    You are on page 1of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 97-7102

    KEVIN CURTIS VENABLE,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS;
    HAZEL KEITH, Manager Combined Records,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    W. Earl Britt, District
    Judge. (CA-96-269)
    Submitted:

    October 14, 1997

    Decided:

    October 29, 1997

    Before HALL, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.


    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Kevin Curtis Venable, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth F. Parsons,
    OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North
    Carolina, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on
    his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record
    and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's
    recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
    on the reasoning of the district court. Venable v. North Carolina
    Dept of Corr., No. CA-96-269 (E.D.N.C. July 8, 1997). We dispense
    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like