Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 17 views

    David Bardes v. L. Auld, 4th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's orders dismissing David Bardes' civil complaint as frivolous and denying his motion for reconsideration. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented. The court affirmed the lower court's rulings.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    David Bardes v. L. Auld, 4th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    17 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's orders dismissing David Bardes' civil complaint as frivolous and denying his motion for reconsideration. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented. The court affirmed the lower court's rulings.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2016-01-19 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-2396

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's orders dismissing David Bardes' civil complaint as frivolous and denying his motion for reconsideration. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented. The court affirmed the lower court's rulings.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    17 views2 pages

    David Bardes v. L. Auld, 4th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's orders dismissing David Bardes' civil complaint as frivolous and denying his motion for reconsideration. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented. The court affirmed the lower court's rulings.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    You are on page 1of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 15-2396

    DAVID A. BARDES, individually, as a taxpayer,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    L. PATRICK AULD, Magistrate Judge; CATHERINE C. EAGLES,
    District Judge; PATRICK MICHAEL DUFFY, Senior U.S. District
    Judge; ROBERT CARR, Ex-Magistrate Judge, in their individual
    and official capacities; US COURTS; UNITED STATES OF
    AMERICA; US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; JOHN AND JANE DOES,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger,
    District Judge. (1:15-cv-00214-MR-DLH)

    Submitted:

    January 14, 2016

    Decided:

    January 19, 2016

    Before AGEE, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    David A. Bardes, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    David

    A.

    dismissing

    his

    Bardes
    civil

    appeals

    the

    complaint

    motion for reconsideration.

    as

    district
    frivolous

    courts
    and

    we

    affirm.

    See

    Bardes

    denying

    See Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e).

    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.


    v.

    Auld,

    No.

    (W.D.N.C. Oct. 2, 2015 & Nov. 10, 2015).

    orders
    his

    We have

    Accordingly,

    1:15-cv-00214-MR-DLH
    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before this court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like