Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 12 views

    Shirley Barnes v. Sam's East Wholesale Club, 4th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Shirley Barnes' civil complaint. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its opinion. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    Shirley Barnes v. Sam's East Wholesale Club, 4th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    12 views3 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Shirley Barnes' civil complaint. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its opinion. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2016-01-19 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-2077

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Shirley Barnes' civil complaint. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its opinion. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    12 views3 pages

    Shirley Barnes v. Sam's East Wholesale Club, 4th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Shirley Barnes' civil complaint. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its opinion. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    You are on page 1of 3

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 15-2077

    SHIRLEY A. BARNES,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    SAMS EAST WHOLESALE CLUB #8220; NICHOLAS SALHANY; RACHEL
    HOUSE,
    Defendants - Appellees,
    and
    TERRY GRIMES; THOMAS E. BOWERS, DA; DONALD S. CALDWELL, DA;
    DARRELL GRAHAM, US EEOC Director,
    Defendants.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Roanoke.
    Glen E. Conrad, Chief
    District Judge. (7:15-cv-00217-GEC)

    Submitted:

    January 14, 2016

    Decided:

    January 19, 2016

    Before AGEE, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Shirley A. Barnes, Appellant Pro Se.


    Carrie Margaret Harris,
    King Fitchett Tower, SPILMAN, THOMAS & BATTLE, PLLC, Roanoke,
    Virginia, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Shirley

    A.

    Barnes

    appeals

    dismissing her civil complaint.


    find

    no

    reversible

    error.

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    We have reviewed the record and


    Accordingly,

    reasons stated by the district court.

    we

    affirm

    for

    the

    See Barnes v. Sams E.

    Wholesale Club #8220, No. 7:15-cv-00217-GEC (W.D. Va. Aug. 20,


    2015).
    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and


    contentions
    this

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in
    aid

    the
    the

    materials
    decisional

    process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like