tmp9076 TMP
tmp9076 TMP
tmp9076 TMP
Presentations
ASHS Annual Conference
Table of Contents
Undergraduate Student Oral
Competition............................................. 1
A Semiyearly Study on the Effect of Light Quality
on Flavor of Greenhouse Grown Tomatoes: LED
Versus HPS.............................................................1
Physiology of Solanaceous Scion and Rootstock
Seedlings for Grafting in Low Temperature
Storage Conditions under Low Light Intensity .....1
Postharvest............................................... 9
Organic Horticulture............................. 13
Summer Cover-cropping Treatments for Enhanced
Winter Vegetable Crop Nutrition, Growth, and
Yield ....................................................................13
Compost, Cover Crops, and Mulch Effects in
Organic Vegetable Systems .................................13
Vegetable Breeding................................ 16
Postharvest............................................. 27
Floriculture............................................ 34
Bioenergy............................................... 37
High-throughput Quality Characterization of
Warm Season Lignocellulosic Feedstocks ..........37
Phenotypic Diversity of Jatropha curcas L.
Accessions under Warm Subtropical
Conditions . ..........................................................37
Differential Gene Expression in Jatropha curcas
In Vitro Cultures Exposed to Microgravity .........38
Fruit Breeding........................................ 42
Fruit Tree Domestication: The Evolution of
Productivity .........................................................42
Genome-wide QTL Analyses Uncovers SNP Markerbased Functional Alleles for Apple
Fresh Sensation Traits ......................................44
Public/Commercial Horticulture/
Computer Applications in
Horticulture........................................... 48
Community Engaged Collaborative Design of
a New Childrens Garden at a Public Garden . ....48
USAID Supporting the Fruit and Vegetable
Propagation............................................ 51
Adventitious Shoot Regeneration from Asiatic
Lily ......................................................................51
Development of a Rooting Protocol for Oenothera
Spp. Vegetative Cuttings . ....................................51
Crop Physiology..................................... 53
Use of Pollen Vitality to Monitor the Nutritional
Status of Flowers .................................................53
Response of AVP1-OX Romaine Lettuce to
Phosphorus............................................................53
Vegetable Breeding................................ 55
ParTicipatory Tomato Breeding for Virus
Resistance in Central America..............................55
QTL Analysis for Early Blight Resistance in
Tomato .................................................................55
Identification of a New Begomovirus Resistance
Locus, Ty-6, in Tomato......................................56
Plant Biotechnology............................... 62
Overexpression of the Atshi Gene in Poinsettia
(Euphorbia pulcherrima) Results in Compact
Plants ...................................................................62
Investigation of Sugar Metabolism in Pear
(Pyrus bretschneideri) Fruits using Integrated
Metabolomics ......................................................62
Postharvest............................................. 67
Genetic and Environmental Variation in Southern
Highbush Blueberry Flavor Components ............67
Pomology............................................... 77
Mechanical Harvest of Hard Cider Apples . ...........77
Teaching Methods.................................. 93
Effectiveness of Online Laboratory
Experiences . ........................................................93
Creating Virtual Nursery Trips to Improve Oncampus and Distance Education in Nursery
Production . ..........................................................94
Using an Extraordinary Combination of
In-person Education and Distance Learning
to Help Women Producers Create Business .......94
Climate Change Literacy in the U.S.
Undergraduate Horticulture Curriculum .............95
Using Different Teaching Methods to Enhance
Student Learning of Climate Change ..................95
A Syllabus Rejig: Aligning Course Goals,
Learning Objectives, Assignments, and
Assessment ..........................................................95
Continuing Agricultural Education: Relationship
between Adult Learning Styles and
Educational Delivery Method Preferences ..........96
Plant Biotechnology............................... 99
Plant Responses to Bacterial Quorum
Sensing ................................................................99
Development and Preliminary Evaluation of
the IStraw90 Axiom Array in Cultivated
Strawberry (Fragaria ananassa) ....................100
ix
Floriculture.......................................... 117
The Effect of Nitrogen and Potassium Fertilization
on Growth and Nutrient Content of Containergrown Dahlia Magic Moment..........................117
Plasticulture......................................... 114
New Jerseys Agricultural Plastics Recycling
Program..............................................................114
Impacts from Three Years of an Integrated High
Tunnel Project in Mississippi ............................115
Pomology............................................. 134
Impacts and Outcomes of Integrated Pest
Management Extension Programs in Umatilla
County, Oregon . ................................................134
Propagation.......................................... 138
xi
xii
Oral Abstracts
Annual Conference of the American Society for Horticultural Science
July 2225, 2013
Palm Desert, California
Monday, July 22, 2013
Celina Gomez
Cary A. Mitchell
Hans Spalholz
Chieri Kubota
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
Mara Grossman
John R. Freeborn
Holly L. Scoggins
12:451:00 PM
Lauren C. Garner
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2
Demitrius Onuaguluchi
Jeremiah Jackson
Bradley Patterson
Lindsey Gilbert
Shannon Combe
Shubha Ireland
Syed Muniruzzaman
Stephen Boue
Harish Ratnayaka
Jayne M. Zajicek
Richard L. Hassell
Patrick Wechter
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
Tomas Hasing
Natalia A. Peres
Hamide Gubbuk
Michael Winterstein
Vance Whitaker
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
4
Hamide Gubbuk*
Tomas Ayala-Silva
Banana has been grown both in open-field and protected cultivation in Turkey. Protected cultivation is very popular due to
the high yield and quality. The objective of the study was to
evaluate agronomic performance of five new banana cultivars
under plastic greenhouse. MA 13, Williams, Jobo, CV
902, and Dwarf Cavendish (control) cultivars were used
as experimental material. Stem circumference, stem height,
plant height, total number of leaves, active number of leaves /
bunch, stalk circumference, and days from shooting to harvest
and bunch weight were determined according to cultivar. The
lowest stem circumference, stem height and bunch stalk circumference were found in Dwarf Cavendish and the highest
in Williams. Total number of leaves varied between 26 and
33. Number of days from shooting to harvest was the shortest
(141 days) in Williams and the longest (163 days) in MA 13.
MA 13 had the highest bunch weight (59 kg) and the lowest
(43 kg) in Dwarf Cavendish. In conclusion, we found that
all tested cultivars were superior to Dwarf Cavendish under
unheated plastic greenhouse.
2:002:15 PM
Mark Nickum
Jacquline Batley
Cathrine Nock
Ian McConachie
Cameron Peace
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
William Graves
2:302:45 PM
Denita Hadziabdic
Adam J. Dattilo
Robert N. Trigiano
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
6
Annalisa Williams
Geoffrey Dervishian
Vine productivity is a function of adequate shoot growth, disease management, and light penetration into the canopy. High
vigor, prevalent in a humid climate, can lead to decreased vine
productivity and fruit yield by increasing shading in the canopy.
Reduced light penetration into the fruit zone reduces fruit bud
initiation, resulting in declining yield over subsequent years.
The objective of this project was to address declining yields in
Florida hybrid bunch grapes by improving vine balance with the
application of different training and renewal systems. In 2011
and 2012, six-year-old Stover grapevines were trained to two
different pruning systems, a bilateral cordon (control) or four-arm
kniffen (4AK). In addition, the existing bilateral cordon system
was altered in two separate treatments to renew cordons [1/2 of
vine each year; cordon renewal (CR)] or extend cordon length,
in which every other vine was removed [alternate vine removal
(AVR)]. All treatments were pruned to approximately 100 buds/
vine during the dormant season. Total yield per vine, berries per
cluster, berry weight, fruit quality assessments [Brix, pH, and
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
Bo Wang
Jiefa Li
Jianjun He
Lei Wang
Caixi Zhang
Wenping Xu
Shiping Wang*
Rebecca Sirianni
Michael Brown
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
8
Joseph Geller
Postharvest
Moderator: Bruce D. Whitaker; bruce.whitaker@ars.
usda.gov
3:003:15 PM
Thomas A. Colquhoun
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
Elizabeth A. Jaworski
Linda Bartoshuk
Charles A. Sims
Vance Whitaker
David G. Clark
Eleni D. Pliakoni
Elizabeth Baldwin
Jinhe Bai
Anne Plotto
Jeffrey K. Brecht
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
10
David Buchanan
Janie Countryman
Chris Sater
Christopher B. Watkins
James Mattheis
David R. Rudell
Cai-Zhong Jiang
Trisha Kietikul
Andrew J. Macnish
Elizabeth J. Mitcham
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
11
G.K. Jayaprakasha
4:004:15 PM
Bhimanagouda S. Patil
Randolph Beaudry
Many aroma volatiles in fresh apple are produced via cellular disruption due to cutting or mastication. Six-carbon (C6)
volatiles, including the aldehydes trans-2-hexenal, hexanal
and cis-3-hexenal, as well as their corresponding alcohols, are
produced from action of the lipoxygenase (LOX) pathway on
substrates released by tissue disruption. LOX genes are sometimes classified based on function and are grouped into 13-LOX
and the 9-LOX groups, which generate C6 and C9 aldehydes,
respectively. Another classification system is based on structure
with those having a putative chloroplast transit peptide called
type-2 LOXs, and those that do not are called type-1 LOXs. All
13 LOXs are thought to be type-2LOXs. It has been proposed
that a 13-LOX gene with a chloroplast transit peptide may be
involved in apple aroma. In our work, twenty-two lipoxygenase
gene sequences were retrieved from the apple genome to identify possible LOX gene candidates that might participate in the
aroma production in apple. We isolated RNA from apple skin
for 8 time points throughout ripening (immature to senescent
stage), made cDNA and performed semi-quantitative RT-PCR
for all 22 LOXs. Amplified fragments from the coding sequence
of each LOX were sequenced and compared to the published
genomic sequence. The expression of most of genes exhibited
no discernable pattern during ripening; however, at least 6 LOXs
were highly expressed and ripening-dependent. qRT-PCR was
performed on these 6 LOX candidates. Of these, 4 LOX genes
were down-regulated during ripening, and 2 LOX genes were
The effect of two commercially practiced postharvest treatments, degreening and low-temperature conditioning, on the
juice volatiles of Rio Red grapefruit (Citrus paradisi Macf.)
were studied. Early season (November) grapefruits were degreened using 3.5 ppm ethylene in a commercial packing-house
to accelerate the peel color change. Non-degreened (control)
and degreened grapefruits were stored under simulated market
conditions for 21 days at 10 C, then 14 days at 21 C. The
volatile constituents were separated on a DB-5MS capillary
column by GC and identified by comparing Kovats indices
and mass spectral data. Nootkatone gives a characteristic odor
to grapefruit, and was higher in non-degreened fruits after 35
days of storage as compared to levels at 0 days. By contrast,
nootkatone was not detected in degreened fruits after 21, 28,
and 35 days of storage. D-limonene, the major component of
volatile oils, decreased in both non-degreened and degreened
fruits with longer storage, with highest levels observed at 0
days. After 35 days of storage, no difference was observed
in the levels of linalool oxide between both treatments, while
-caryophyllene was higher in non-degreened fruits. Lowtemperature conditioning (7 days at 16 C) is used prior to cold
storage to reduce chilling injury in grapefruits. To examine effect
of low-temperature conditioning and storage at 11 C and 5 C
on volatile oils in Rio Red grapefruit, fruits were stored for 12
weeks and juice samples were collected at 3-week intervals.
D-limonene levels sharply increased in all three treatments at
3 weeks after storage; however, after 12 weeks, D-limonene
levels were similar to levels at 0 days. Nootkatone was higher
in the grapefruits stored at 11 C than those stored at 5 C and
CD fruits, but, the grapefruits stored at 5 C had higher levels
of -caryophyllene and linalool oxide compared to 11 C and
CD fruits. This project is based upon work supported by the
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
12
Gene E. Lester
John L. Jifon
Miguel A. Gomez-Lim
Organic Horticulture
Moderator: Carl E. Motsenbocker, cmotsenbocker@
agcenter.lsu.edu
4:154:30 PM
Milton E. McGiffen
Cynthia Cambardella
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
13
Mathieu Ngouajio
Jeffrey T. Martin
Daniel C. Brainard
Annette L. Wszelaki*
Since the 1950s, plastic has been used as soil mulch in agriculture to increase yield, quality, and earliness of harvest, while
reducing weed growth, irrigation requirements, soilborne plant
diseases, and nutrient leaching. However, once removed from
the field, plastic disposal and recycling can be expensive. Degradable mulches were introduced into agricultural production
nearly 30 years ago as an alternative to plastic or polyethylene
mulch, with the intention to reduce agricultural plastics in the
waste stream. Degradable mulches have the potential to reduce
removal costs and lessen environmental impacts, while providing similar benefits as plastic during the growing season. Four
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
14
Robert Williams
William B. Evans
Rao S. Mentreddy
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
15
Roland Ebel*
Vegetable Breeding
Moderator: Charles L. Rohwer, rohw0009@umn.edu
5:005:15 PM
Vincent A. Fritz
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
16
Phillip Griffiths
Jeanine M. Davis
Mark Hutton
Wythe Morris
Carl E. Sams
Dean A. Kopsell
Thomas Bjrkman
A Coordinated Agricultural Project (CAP) entitled Establishing an Eastern Broccoli Industry is funded under the Specialty
Crop Research Initiative (SCRI), and a primary component of
the project is a system of regional hybrid broccoli trials conducted along the eastern seaboard. Hybrids currently input into
the trialing system originate from three private seed company
and three public institution breeding programs and include
intra- and inter-program crosses. The entrance point into the
system is designated Phase One and involves testing in two
replicated trials at each of four regional sites in South Carolina,
North Carolina, New York, and Maine. One Phase One trial
is planted at each site during an optimal season and a second
during less optimal conditions (e.g., hot) that are likely to
stress plants. In all trials, hybrids are compared to standard
check hybrids and given ratings for eleven quality traits to
determine which entries will be promoted to additional phases.
Approximately 25% of the Phase One entries are advanced to
Phase Two wherein they are planted in replicated trials at each
primary site at five different times of the year from early spring
through late fall. The top two or three broccoli hybrids in Phase
Two trials at a given site are advanced to Phase Three, which
involves large strip trials conducted on farms of cooperating
growers at various locations near each regional site. Floret
samples from heads harvested out of Phase Two trials are
used to assay levels of important nutritional constituents like
glucosinolates and carotenoids. This trial system is expected to
identify broccoli hybrids well adapted to East Coast growing
conditions and to aid breeding programs in determining which
particular hybrids to release. An added benefit of these trials is
that a large body of data is generated about specific genotypes
Don LaBonte
Ramon A. Arancibia
William M. Wintermantel
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
17
Eric T. Natwick
Todd C. Wehner
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
18
Carl E. Sams
Robert C. Morrow
Dean A. Kopsell
Robert C. Morrow
We have previously shown that specific narrow-band wavelengths of light from light-emitting diodes (LEDs) stimulate
production of glucoraphanin and several other secondary
metabolites that have significant dietary implications. The
objective of this research was to determine the effects of different percentages of specific narrow wavelengths of light on
glucosinolate production in broccoli microgreens (Brassica
oleracea). Broccoli microgreens were sprouted on fiber pads
submerged in deionized water. Following the appearance of
the first true leaf, a 20% Hoaglands #2 solution was used to
maintain saturation of the pads providing a nutrient source for
the plants. After the first 24 h, light treatments were initiated
on a 16 h photoperiod with a constant air temperature of 24 C.
Light intensity was maintained at 250 molm-2s-1 for all light
treatments. The following light treatments were applied: 1)
fluorescent/incandescent light (control); 2) 5% blue (455470
nm) and 95% red (627630 nm); 3) 5% blue, 85% red, and
10% green (525 nm); 4) 20% blue, 80% red; and 5) 20% blue,
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
19
8:308:45 AM
8:459:00 AM
Chieri Kubota
Cary A. Mitchell
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
20
Justin E Schabow
Many plants, including potato, tobacco, tomato, and geraniums, are known to develop Oedema or intumescence injury.
This injury develops exclusively on plants growing in controlled environment facilities compared to field grown plants.
Early studies have suggested a link between light quality and
Oedema. For example, UV and/or far-red wavelengths were
found to mitigate this injury. Here, we report that Oedema can
be mitigated by calcium nutrition. Plants of cultivars Russet
Burbank and Atlantic were grown using in vitro shoot cultures
in 20.4 L pots. Plants were irrigated daily to excess with a Peters Professional Peat Lite Special 20N10P20K fertilizer.
For this purpose 104 g of this fertilizer was mixed with 200 L
of tap water. Two calcium treatments (1 mM and 10 mM) were
evaluated with 13 replications per treatment. The source of
calcium was calcium chloride. About 20 days after the start of
these treatments the Oedema injury was observed only on plants
of the cultivar Russet Burbank. Upper canopy leaves in the 1
mM treatment had an average of 64% of the leaf area covered
with injury. However, only 4% of the leaf area on average was
covered with injury in the plants that received the 10 mM Ca
treatment. Average leaf calcium concentration was nearly 2x
in plants given 10 mM Ca as compared to the 1 mM Ca treatment. There were no other apparent growth and development
differences among the two Ca treatments. These data provide
evidence that Oedema injury can be mitigated by supplemental
calcium and that Russet Burbank is more prone to this type of
injury compared to Atlantic.
Specified Source(s) of Funding: USDA/NIFA grant
G.K. Jayaprakasha
Bhimanagouda S. Patil*
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
21
8:308:45 AM
Steve Guldan
Jujube cultivars were imported into the United States beginning in 1908 by USDA agricultural explorer Frank N. Meyer
and jujube seedlings were introduced as early as 1837. Now,
jujubes are planted in a number of states including California,
Arizona, New Mexico, Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas, Tennessee,
Georgia, Indiana, Mississippi, Florida, South Carolina, North
Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Illinois. They grow well with high
quality fruit in the south and southwest regions. Sixty-seven accessions were imported by F.N. Meyer in the early 20th century
and all were planted first at the USDA Chico Station and then
distributed to other USDA stations. The jujube research at Chico
Station continued till the end of the 1950s. Jujube cultivars now
in the United States are from several sources: Frank Meyers
imports, introductions from USDAs Chico Station, selections
from across the states, recent imports by Roger Meyer, and others
from China or other jujube growing regions in the world. From
F.N. Meyers importation, USDA formally recommended four
of them: Mu Shing Hong (P.I. 22684), Lang (P.I. 22686),
Shui Men (P.I. 38245), and Li (P.I. 38249). Now, Li and
Lang are the two dominant cultivars commercially available
and Shuimen, So, Mu (Mu Shing Hong), and Yu are also
available in small quantities. At USDAs Chico Station, Ackerman and his colleagues selected/developed four cultivars: Chico,
GI-1183, Thornless, and GA-866 before the station was closed
in the late 1950s. There were also quite a few cultivars from
across the country named after people or towns that could have
been progeny of the 19th century imports, seedlings from the
patent office jujube seed distribution in 1854 or remaining plants
from Meyers imports, for example: Abbeville, Redland,
Sherwood, Texas Tart, Don Polenski, Fitzgerald, and
Topeka. Jujube lovers exchange resources and name them
without much testing or research. There have been some recent
introductions from China and other jujube growing regions:
Shanxi Li, Winter Delight, Honeyjar, Sihong, Globe,
Ant Admire, Black Sea, etc. NMSUs Alcalde Center also
imported over 30 cultivars from China in 2011. There are a
total of 6070 jujube cultivars now in the United States. Most
of them are not commercially available yet. Growers and home
gardeners are requesting more diversified cultivar options. Regional cultivar trials and evaluation are desperately needed for
jujubes. With its high nutritional value and wide adaptation to
a range of soil and weather conditions, jujubes would get more
and more popular in the United States.
Fred G. Gmitter,Jr.
William S. Castle
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
22
Jonathan H. Crane
Silvia Nietsche
Wanda Montas
Wagner Vendrame
Megan Muehlbauer
John M. Capik
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
23
Greg Browne
David Doll
Steven A. Fennimore
Bradley D. Hanson
Edward W. Bush
Breeding, development, introduction and promotion of Rhododendrons in Louisiana has been significant since the 1970s.
Accomplishments have come from university horticulturists
and nursery industry members. Larry Brown, long time ornamental horticulture research at the LSU AgCenters Hammond
Research Station, Hammond, LA, conducted azalea breeding that resulted in the release of Southern Summer Rose.
Other selections from his program were not released but were
considered for release as Southern Summer Sun and Flos
Favorite. Horticulture breeder Dick Stadtheer came to the
LSU AgCenters Department of Horticulture from North Carolina
State University (NC State) where he had begun a program on
the development of summer and fall flowering azalea cultivars.
The plants released from this effort (some from NC State and
some from LSU) were named the CARLA hybrids and included
Adelaide Pope, Autumn Sun, Carror, Cochran Lavender,
Elaine, Emily, Fred D. Cochran, Ione Burden, Jan
Cochran, Jane Spalding, Parlarge, Pink Camellia, Pink
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
24
Michael Dobres
Star Roses and Plants (SR&P) is a leading breeder and distributor of perennials, shrubs and roses. Its products include the Knock
Out rose. NovaFlora is SR&Ps breeding division. Trialing
is an integral part of the breeding process and comprehensive
screening can be the difference between a financial success and
failure. In addition, it builds a well-respected reputation for
the company or institution that results in the consumer eagerly
awaiting the next great product. The trialing process at SR&P
is a multi-year, multi-region process involving numerous cooperators from industry, academia, and public gardens. SR&P
has been trialing rose varieties for decades, and a program to
evaluate woodies and perennials was instituted in 2009. The
trial has grown to evaluate more than 250 new varieties annually
for landscape performance, grower traits, and overall aesthetic
appearance. Varieties developed by NovaFlora and licensed-in
from university and private breeders are evaluated and compared
to industry standards both in containers and in-ground trials to
provide the grower and consumer a thorough understanding
of growth habits and aesthetic benefits from beginning to end.
Information garnered benefits not just growers and consumers
but can be utilized for patent-filing and marketing departments
for promotion and distribution.
8:308:45 AM
Susana D. Vanzie-Canton
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
25
Sun Kim
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
26
Postharvest
Moderator: Yan Wang, yan.wang@oregonstate.edu
8:008:15 AM
J. Wyatt Brown
8:158:30 AM
Marita I. Cantwell
Claudia Moggia
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
27
Gustavo Lobos
Jorge Retamales
Carolina Bravo
8:459:00 AM
Marita I. Cantwell
Marita I. Cantwell
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
28
Amarat Simonne
Elizabeth Baldwin
Jeffrey K. Brecht
David Sugar
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
29
Sue Dove
James S. Owen
Paul Thomas
Marc vanIersel
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
30
Marc vanIersel
Roberto Testezlaf
Andrew Ristvey
Steven Cohan
John D. Lea-Cox
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
31
Jongyun Kim
Sue Dove
Marc vanIersel
John D. Lea-Cox
between the air entering and exiting the gas exchange chambers
was measured with an infrared gas analyzer in differential mode
(LI-6262; LI-COR, Lincoln, NE). Most likely as a result of
differential Crassuleacean Acid metabolism (CAM), S. album
fixed C at 2.55 ( 0.30) mmol and S kamtschaticum fixed C at
4.68 ( 0.74) mmol. During this same period, S. kamtschticum
used 68.87 ( 8.15) grams of water in contrast to 45.82 (4.15)
grams of water used by S. album. Malic acid analysis indicated
that S. album was in CAM throughout the course of the study,
but S. kamtschticum only began CAM idling weakly around
day 9. These findings suggest that S. album was the more
drought tolerant species under the environmental conditions
of this experiment. For geographic areas with extended dry
periods, S. album may be the preferred species compared to
S. kamtschaticum. In cooler, wetter climates, this species may
not transpire water fast enough to contribute substantially to
green roof stormwater efficiency. Nevertheless, having a species that can tolerate periods of drought stress is important for
overall system function, especially when ongoing green roof
management or renovation costs are considered.
Specified Source(s) of Funding: USDANIFA, SCRI Award
no.2009-51181-05768
9:159:30 AM
Alex B. Daniels
Dave M. Barnard
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
32
Bruk E. Belayneh
John D. Lea-Cox*
Erik Lichtenberg
Monica Saavedra
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
33
Floriculture
Moderator: James E. Barrett; jbarrett@ufl.edu
9:4510:00 AM
Guihong Bi
Richard L. Harkess
For its fragrance and showy display with multicolors, Iris germanica has great potential to serve as a specialty cut flower. Some
cutivars of Iris germanica have the potential to rebloom in one
growing season. However, limited research has been conducted
concerning nitrogen (N) fertilizer guideline for these reblooming cultivars. The objective of this research is to investigate
the optimal N management practices for promoting blooming
performance of reblooming iris. The study was initiated in Spring
2012, using Immortality, a reliable reblooming iris cultivar, as
the research material. Plants were grown in 1-gallon containers
and treated with one of five N fertigation rates (N at 0, 5, 10, 15,
or 20 mM) during the growing season. Results showed that higher
N fertigation rates not only accelerated plant growth rate, but also
promoted earlier first bloom and increased the number of flower
stalks at second bloom. Plants received N at 0 and 5 mM rates
did not produce any second bloom. Plants treated with N at 20
mM produced the most number of stalks at second bloom. The
tissue nutrient analysis results showed that the N concentrations
in root and rhizome in Winter 2012 increased with increasing N
fertigation rates. The growth data in early Spring 2013 showed
that plant height and number of fans per plant increased with
increasing N fertigation rates in 2012. Results from this study
suggested that increasing N fertigation rate can increase plant
nutrient concentration and improve plant growth and blooming
performance. Plants treated with N at 20 mM have the potential
to produce the most number of flower stalks.
10:0010:15 AM
Yi-Ai Kuo
Carolyn A. Bartuska
Robert F. Weidman
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
34
10:3010:45 AM
Brian E. Whipker
John M. Dole
Ingram McCall
Marc vanIersel
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
35
John M. Dole
Frank A. Blazich
Snapdragon (Antirrhinum majus L.) and celosia (Celosia cristata L.) are commercially important specialty cut flowers, but
postharvest handling protocols for extending vase life need to be
optimized. Stems of snapdragon harvested when the lowermost
florets started expanding, had 3.4 days longer vase life than
stems harvested with three or more florets open at harvest, while
celosia stems harvested when the flower heads were < 2 cm in
diameter, had 14.0 days longer vase life than stems harvested
with flower heads > 5 cm at harvest. However, visual quality
of later harvested stems for both species was higher than early
harvested stems. Harvest procedures, exogenous ethylene,
and commercial hydrators had no effect on longevity of both
species. For celosia, anti-ethylene agents also had no effect,
however, for snapdragon, the anti-ethylene agent, silver thiosulfate, increased vase life 3.2 or 3.7 days longer than deionized
(DI) water or 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP), respectively.
Dry-stored stems of snapdragon had longer vase life compared
with stems stored in water, for not more than 2 weeks, whereas,
celosia stems did not tolerate storage at 4 1 C irrespective of
the storage methods, and if necessary, should only be stored in
water, for not more than 1 week. Use of both hydrator and/or
holding preservatives did not result in significant differences
in vase life of both species; however, pulsing with 5% or 10%
sucrose supplemented with the antimicrobial agent, Kathon (7
mgL-1), for 24 hours doubled vase life of snapdragon stems and
increased flower bud opening and fresh weight of stems during the vase period. Stems of snapdragon kept continuously in
commercial preservatives had 2-fold longer vase life than stems
in DI water. Floral foam reduced vase life of snapdragon when
saturated with preservatives, or had no effect when saturated
with DI water. Stems of celosia kept continuously in Floralife
Clear Professional Flower Food with or without floral foam had
longer vase life compared with Chrysal Clear Universal Flower
Food or foam saturated with DI water.
11:1511:30 AM
Wesley Randall*
Annual bedding plant seedlings (plugs) are considered highquality when they are compact, fully rooted transplants with a
large stem caliper and high root dry mass. The objectives of this
study were to: 1) quantify the effects of light emitting diodes
(LEDs) and high pressure sodium lamps (HPS) as supplemental
light sources to produce annual bedding plant seedlings; and
2) determine what red (R) to blue (B) light ratio produces the
highest quality seedlings. Ten bedding plant species (Antirrhinum majus L., Begonia xsemperflorens L., Catharanthus
roseus L., Celosia argentea L. var. plumosa L., Impatiens walleriana Hook. f., Pelargonium xhortorum, Petunia xhybrida
Vilm.-Andr., Salvia splendens Sellow ex J.A. Shultes, Tagetes
patula L., and Viola xwittrockiana Gams.) were grown under
100 molm2s1 delivered from HPS lamps or LED arrays with
varying proportions (%) of red:blue light (100:0, 85:15, 70:30,
and HPS) with a 16-h photoperiod. Seedling of Antirrhinum,
Begonia, Impatiens, Petunia, and Tagetes grown under the
85:15 light treatment were generally more compact with a larger
stem caliper and higher relative chlorophyll content than plants
grown under HPS lamps. For example, stem caliper increased
by 13.6%, 6.5%, 3.5%, 5.1%, and 11.5 % compared to seedlings
grown under HPS lamps for Antirrhinum, Begonia, Impatiens,
Petunia, and Tagetes, respectively. Relative chlorophyll content
of Antirrhinum and Begonia increased by 11.6% and 14.0%,
respectively, compared to seedlings grown under HPS lamps.
Stem length of Antirrhinum, Impatiens, and Tagetes was 5.7%,
30.6%, and 20.8% shorter, respectively, compared to seedlings
grown under HPS lamps. Seedlings grown under LED light
treatments generally had higher quality parameters than those
grown under HPS lamps.
11:3011:45 AM
Yong Ha Rhie
Ki Sun Kim
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
36
Bioenergy
Moderator: John L. Jifon, jljifon@ag.tamu.edu
10:0010:15 AM
Jorge daSilva
Gerleene Acuna
Nael El-Hout
Wagner Vendrame
Jonathan H. Crane
Sidnei Reis
The phenotypic diversity of 15 accessions of jatropha (Jatropha curcas L.) during the first and second flowering periods
under the warm subtropical south Florida climate was assessed by using multivariate analysis. Plants were established
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
37
Ania Pinares
Genhua Niu
Pedro Osuna
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
38
Joel L. Cuello
Patricia A. Skinkis
R. Paul Schreiner
Takanori Hoshino
Inga Zasada
A new strategy in hydrogen production via biophotolysis developed previously was implemented in mutant strains of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Implementing PSI-light (photosystem I
light) successfully demonstrated improved hydrogen production
in the wild type strain of C. reinhardtii in a previous study ,
however, the results also showed rapid attenuation of hydrogen
production even under PSI-light due to inhibited hydrogenase
activity caused by oxygen, which was simultaneously produced
through the water splitting reactions of PSII (photosystem II)
under radiation. In order to further decrease oxygen generation
under PSI-light during the hydrogen production phase, use of
some mutant strains of C. reinhardtii, that are known to show
limited oxygen generation, were investigated. Continuous
supply of PSI-light after a short anaerobic adaptation under
dark conditions achieved significantly prolonged hydrogen
production up to 18 hours in a chlorophyll b deficient mutant
(Cbn 1-48) and a very high light tolerant mutant (VHLR-S4)
yielding H2 at 220.33 and 175.64 Lmg-1 Chlorophyll (= H2
at 4243.05 and 8731.39 Lmg-1 dry cell weight), respectively.
In addition, by iterating light and dark every 1.5 hours with
PSI-light, hydrogen production was successfully extended to
27 hours yielding H2 at 365.61 Lmg-1 Chlorophyll (= H2 at
8812.12 Lmg-1 dry cell weight) in cbn 1-48. Further, greater
energy conversion efficiency from radiation energy to formation of hydrogen molecules was achieved with the combination
of PSI-light and some mutant strains compared to alternate
methods of biophotolysis.
Plant-parasitic nematodes are commonly encountered in semiarid vineyards of the Pacific Northwest; however, little is known
about their distribution and pathogenicity. We investigated the
spatial distribution of plant-parasitic nematodes in semi-arid
vineyards to provide grape growers with information to better
manage nematodes. Two vineyards in eastern Washington were
sampled: Chardonnay grown on a sandy loam soil and White
Riesling grown on silt loam soil. Nematode populations densities
were determined horizontally by sampling five 152 x 213 cm
sampling locations at 30 cm intervals to a depth of 45 cm. Vertical sampling was performed at another five sampling locations
where five soil cores 91 cm deep were collected directly under an
emitter and 30 cm to the N, S, E, or W of the emitter; collected
cores were partitioned into 15 cm samples. The percentage of
soil moisture and number of different plant-parasitic nematodes
were determined for each soil sample. In addition, fine root
biomass and AMF colonization were quantified in all horizontal
soil samples. The plant-parasitic nematodes Meloidogyne hapla,
Pratylenchus spp., Xiphinema spp., and Paratylenchus spp. were
found at both vineyards, while Mesocriconema xenoplax was
only detected in the Chardonnay vineyard. At both vineyards,
population densities of M. hapla were positively related to soil
moisture and fine root biomass (P < 0.0001). The same trend
was observed for M. xenoplax at the Chardonnay vineyard (P<
0.0003). The opposite was observed for AMF colonization of
the roots, where less soil moisture corresponded with higher
AMF colonization of roots (P < 0.002). Roots that were galled
as a result of M. hapla infectivity had significantly less AMF
colonization than non-galled roots (P < 0.02). The horizontal
distribution of nematodes varied among the nematode genera
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
39
Blackberry plants have been propagated by tip-layering, softand hard-cane cuttings, root cuttings, and tissue culture (TC).
In the last 20 years, long-cane blackberry plants for off-season
fruit production have become popular. Long-cane blackberry
plants have been produced from TC-plug plants that could yield
as many as 20,000/ha of bare-root plants with four 1.5-m-tall
canes. However, this system requires that the field be replanted
annually with 8,000 fresh TC plug plants. A modified rotating
cross-arm trellis system was used to produce over ~120,000 1.5to 2.0-m-long cane Triple Crown and Siskiyou plants from
stock plants established at a density of only 1,700/ha. Lateral
canes that develop from horizontally trained primocanes were
trained to grow upward on the wires positioned on a slanted
cross-arm trellis and then down to the ground. Tips of lateral
canes were inserted into pots for induction of adventitious roots.
After 4 weeks, the entire lateral cane was detached from the
stock plant and the proximal end also inserted into a moistened
medium. Rooting occurred at that end. With this procedure,
3-m-long cane plants with roots at both ends of the cane were
generated. Rooted cane plants were chilled and then grown in
a greenhouse maintained at 17 to 22 C during the day and 14
to 16 C at night. In both cultivars, 70% of buds broke. Inflorescences developed on 68% and 46% of shoots on Siskiyou
and Triple Crown cane plants, respectively. Each inflorescence
produced over 5 fruit averaging 7.1 g/fruit. Additional studies
are needed to determine the effect of longer exposure to cold
temperatures and dark, cold-room storage on the performance
of long-cane blackberry plants. The cold-stored, containerized
long-cane blackberry plants have potential for late-season fruit
production. Additional methods of producing long-cane blackberry plants will be discussed.
Specified Source(s) of Funding: USDAARS
10:4511:00 AM
Robert Martin
Sead Sabanadzovic
Ioannis Tzanetakis*
Audrey L. Davis
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
40
Shiping Wang*
James W. Olmstead
Rebecca L. Darnell
Caixi Zhang
Jianjun He
Xiuming Yu
Jiefa Li
Wenping Xu
Xianjin Bai
Xianjin Bai
Xianjin Bai
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
41
Rebecca Harbut*
Jed Colquhoun
Fruit Breeding
Moderator: Ralph Scorza, ralph.scorza@ars.usda.gov
11:3011:45 AM
Studies of fruit tree domestication are rather scarce and productivity issues have been barely addressed. In the present
study fruit tree productivity has been analyzed in the broader,
biological context of trees sexual reproduction. The survival
of individual trees does not depend upon regular, year-by-year
flowering and fruiting. The irregular, fluctuating masting
habit of forest trees probably represents the natural pattern
of trees sexual reproduction. In the wild, trees seldom reach
their fruiting potential; environmental stresses and endogenous
resource constraints preclude regular fruiting and limit fruitfulness. Consistent, year-by-year fruiting has been established in
domesticated fruit tree crops through unconscious and conscious
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
42
Cameron Peace
James Luby
Katherine Evans
12:0012:15 PM
Umesh Rosyara
Audrey Sebolt
Amy F. Iezzoni
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
43
Chris Dardick
Ann Callahan
Chinnathambi Srinivasan
12:3012:45 PM
Sujeet Verma
Cameron Peace
Doug Raines
Ted M. DeJong
Sarah Castro
David R. Rudell
Katherine Evans
Apple (Malus x domestica Borkh.) is one of the most important fresh fruits in the world based on its annual production.
Washington State is the leading apple producer in the United
States, accounting for approximate 60% of the total production.
The Washington State University apple breeding program was
started in 1994 to develop new improved quality apple varieties
focusing on fruit texture, flavor, and storability. The program
uses DNA-based markers to assist in cross-planning and to
improve the efficiency of selection, however, the number of
available markers is still limited. Sweetness is an important but
complex component of flavor, which has low heritability and
is strongly influenced by environmental factors. As part of the
RosBREED project, the phenotypic data of individual sugars
(fructose, glucose, sucrose, and sorbitol), sensory sweetness,
and soluble solids content (SSC) for 285 and 282 individuals
were collected at harvest in 2011 and 2012, respectively. These
individuals were genotyped with the RosBREED 8K apple
SNP chip. FlexQTLTM software was used to detect QTLs in
Washington apple germplasm. Putative QTLs for fructose in
Chromosome 1, 2, and 7, glucose in Chromosome 1, 6, 8, and
16, sucrose in chromosome 13, and sorbitol in chromosome 16
have been detected. These QTLs will be further studied for the
development of functional markers to enable easy application
in the Washington apple breeding program.
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
44
Cari Schmitz
Benjamin Orcheski
Julia Harshman
Katherine Evans
Susan K. Brown
Matthew Clark
Yingzhu Guan
James R. McFerson
Nahla Bassil
Umesh Rosyara
Marco Bink
James Luby
Eric vandeWeg
Amy F. Iezzoni
Cameron Peace
Crispness, juiciness, and acidity are traits that collectively determine the fresh sensation of apple flesh and greatly affect
consumer liking of apple cultivars. Unfortunately, our lack of
genetic understanding of these attributes has slowed progress in
apple breeding programs. The RosBREED project has developed
genotypic and phenotypic resources to enable DNA-informed
breeding in apple and other Rosaceae crops. For example, an
8 K SNP chip for scanning genomes of approximately 1000
individuals of the U.S. apple breeding germplasm has been
developed. Pedigree based analysis approach, using FlexQTL
and Pedimap softwares, has been implemented for location
specific (Washington, Minnesota, and New York) genome-wide
QTL analysis for fresh sensation traits and linkage groups
1:452:00 PM
Charles Cantrell
Tess Astatkie
Thomas E. Horgan
Vicki L. Schlegel
Ekaterina Jeliazkova
Researchers reporting data on essential oil content and composition of various aromatic plants are utilizing different extraction
methods and duration time. The essential oil of a number of
aromatic crops is traditionally extracted via steam distillation.
However, the optimal distillation time for most crops is largely
uknown. Our previous research has shown that distillation time
(DT) can modify essential oil yield and composition of several
crops such as coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.), oregano
(Origanum vulgare L.), peppermint (Mentha x piperita L.),
Japanese cornmint (Mentha canadensis L.) lemongrass (Cymbopogon flexuosus Steud.), and palmarosa (Cymbopogon martinii
Roxb.), pine (Pinus ponderosa Dougl. ex Laws), of female
and of male Rocky Mountain juniper (Juniperus scopulorum
Sarg.). We conducted additional research on the effect of DT
on other crops including anise (Pimpinella anisum L.), wormwood (Artemisia annua L.), fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Mill),
and lavender (Lavandula angustifolia Mill.). Herewith, we are
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
45
Ekaterina Jeliazkova
Tess Astatkie
Crofton Sloan
John McKee
Charles Cantrell
Dennis Rowe
Valtcho D. Jeliazkov
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
46
Charles Cantrell
Tess Astatkie
Ekaterina Jeliazkova
Peppermint (Mentha x piperita L.) is grown mainly in the northwestern United States, while spearmints (Native spearmint,
Mentha spicata L. and Scotch spearmint, M. gracilis Sole.)
are mainly grown in the Midwest. There is no information on
how these crops would yield under the Wyoming short growing
season conditions. Field experiments were conducted in 2011
to evaluate the effect of harvest time on peppermint Black
Mitcham and Native spearmint oil content and yield. The
Native spearmint plots were harvested every week commencing
on September 14 and finishing on November 1. Whereas, the
peppermint plots were harvested on September 20, September
28, and October 5, 2011, (peppermint plants were damaged and
later killed by subsequent frosts). The last two harvests yielded
reduced oil content and oil yield of Native spearmint relative to
the first two harvests. The concentration of carvone in spearmint
was also reduced during the last two harvests. Harvest time did
not change oil content or oil yields of peppermint. However,
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
47
Public/Commercial Horticulture/
Computer Applications in
Horticulture
Moderator: Peter Ling, ling.23@osu.edu
1:452:00 PM
Babar Malik
Raheel Anwar
Lucy K. Bradley*
Julieta T. Sherk
Julia L. Kornegay
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
48
Chengyan Yue
2:453:00 PM
districts to provide broad based technical and financial assistance to improve product and process standardization, quality
control, compliance with food safety standards and certifications, and develop export linkages. Another major initiative is
to convert the pulping facilities from single line (product) to
multiline (multi-products) to make them more cost competitive
by increasing their annual utilization factor.
2:152:30 PM
Taein Lee
Charles R. Hall
Bridget K. Behe
Robert Boucherle
Jonathan M. Frantz
Stephen Ficklin
Chun-Huai Cheng
Anna Blenda
Sushan Ru
Ping Zheng
Katherine Evans
Cameron Peace
Nnadozie Oraguzie
Albert Abbott
Desmond R. Layne
Mercy A. Olmstead
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
49
Fred Gmitter
Chunxian Chen
Lukas Mueller
Dorrie Main
3:003:15 PM
Jighan Jeong
Lloyd Nackley
Soo-Ock Kim
Jin I. Yun
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
50
Douglas C. Needham
Propagation
Moderator: Chiwon W. Lee, chiwon.lee@ndsu.edu
4:004:15 PM
Hannah Farish-Williford
Samantha Smith
Barry Flinn
of its large, attractive flowers. The Asiatic lilies are the hardiest of all the lily hybrids, they grow very well in USDA Zones
310, are easiest for the beginner to grow, and are the first to
flower each season. In an effort to establish an Asiatic lily in
vitro breeding system, we developed a highly efficient plant
regeneration system for an elite Asiatic lily hybrid Jocelyns
Bouquet. The Jocelyns Bouquet is an Asiatic hybrid with
multi-bloom characters, reported to produce up to one hundred
blooms on a single plant. Tissue culture experiments tested
pedicel, immature seedpod, and bulb-scale explants, combined
with MS basal medium supplemented with different levels of
BA (0, 1, 2, 4, 8 mg/L) and NAA (0, 0.2, 0.5, 1 mg/L). It took
45 days for the explants to regenerate new adventitious shoots,
with the bulb scale the best initial explant material. The BA at
1 mg/L combined with all levels of NAA produced high frequency regeneration. Regenerated plants were transplanted in
the greenhouse, grew well and produced normal flowers when
compared with the mother plant.
4:154:30 PM
Bruce L. Dunn
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
51
Mark A. Kroggel
Leo Sabatino
Brent Salazar
Grafting of vegetable seedlings is a unique horticultural technology to overcome soil-borne diseases and pests and to add extra
vigor to the plants under various environmental stress conditions.
In order to advance the use of grafting in U.S. vegetable production in open fields, key issues to address include 1) increasing
the propagation capacity to meet the expected large number of
seedlings necessary to supply the demands of typically large
farms and 2) reducing production costs. Traditionally, vegetable
grafting is a labor-intensive process involving much training and
logistics. However, the seasonal nature of nursery operations
due to the limitation of transportation of the grafted seedlings
is problematic when nurseries are interested in introducing
vegetable grafting to serve producers who are interested in using the technology. To address this issue, we examined factors
affecting quality and growth of unrooted grafted cuttings as a
means to improve the distribution of grafted materials and for
nurseries to centralize the labor-intensive grafting operation to
serve producers in various regions (i.e., various planting seasons).
Grafted tomato and watermelon cuttings (Durinta tomato or
Tri-X 313 watermelon scion with Aloha tomato or Strong
Tosa interspecific hybrid squash rootstock, respectively) were
harvested after 0, 1, 3, 5, or 7 days of healing after grafting and
kept for 72 hours in a dark chamber maintained at 10 (tomato),
12 (watermelon) or 20 C (both species). The results showed that
it required a minimum of 3 and 5 days of post-grafting healing
for tomato and watermelon, respectively, before harvest in order
to maintain growth and development rates after 3-day simulated
transportation, as equivalent to non-treated cuttings (control).
Transportation at a lower temperature (10 C for tomato or 12C
for watermelon) seems to contribute to maintaining better visual
cutting quality than 20 C. Although more research needs to
be done to establish protocols suitable for various species and
scion-rootstock combinations, effective use of unrooted grafted
cuttings in nurseries with and without grafting capabilities may
Richard L. Hassell
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
52
Saeum Choi
Karson Beckstrom
Todd P. West
Crop Physiology
Moderator: Charles A. Sanchez, sanchez@ag.arizona.edu
4:004:15 PM
4:154:30 PM
Roberto Gaxiola
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
53
Augusto Ramirez-Godoy
Jorge-Edwin Betancourt
Diego-Leonardo Sanchez-Canro
4:455:00 PM
Jiwan P. Palta*
Zejing Zhang
Guomin Zheng
Rongfu Gao
Genhua Niu
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
54
Rongfu Gao
Zejing Zhang
Genhua Niu
Vegetable Breeding
Moderator: Haejeen Bang, hbang@tamu.edu
4:004:15 PM
James Nienhuis*
Allen vanDeynze
Sung-Chur Sim
David Francis
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
55
John W. Scott
Sunggil Kim
Daniel Leskovar
Bhimanagouda S. Patil
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
56
Daniel Leskovar
Bhimanagouda S. Patil
Keita Kudo
Itsumi Sugimoto
Nobushige Yonezawa
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
57
4:154:30 PM
K.R. Reddy
Mark Shankle
Ramon A. Arancibia
Justin E Schabow
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
58
Eduardo J. Chica
Ricardo R. Carrera
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
59
Pascal Nzokou
Ayse Deligoz
C.M. Ayub
Ismail Koc*
Musa Genc
Tahira Abbas
Muhammad A. Shahid
5:305:45 PM
Rashad M. Balal
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
60
Zafar Iqbal
Neil Mattson
Neil Mattson
Francisco Garcia-Sanchez
Francisco Garcia-Sanchez
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
61
Plant Biotechnology
Moderator: Zong-Ming Cheng, zcheng@utk.edu
8:008:15 AM
Euphorbia pulcherrima, poinsettia, is a non-food and nonfeed vegetatively propagated ornamental plant. Appropriate
plant height is one of the most important traits in poinsettia
production and is commonly achieved by application of chemical growth retardants. To produce compact poinsettia plants
with desirable height and reduce the utilization of growth
retardants, the Arabidopsis SHORT INTERNODE (AtSHI)
gene controlled by the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter
was introduced into poinsettia by Agrobacterium-mediated
transformation. Three independent transgenic lines were
produced and stable integration of transgene was verified by
PCR and Southern blot analysis. Reduced plant height (21%
to 52%) and internode lengths (31% to 49%) were obtained in
the transgenic lines compared to control plants. This correlates
positively with the AtSHI transcript levels, with the highest levels
in the most dwarfed transgenic line (TL1). The indole-3-acetic
acid (IAA) content appeared lower (11% to 31% reduction) in
the transgenic lines compared to the wild type (WT) controls,
with the lowest level (31% reduction) in TL1. Total internode
numbers, bract numbers and bract area were significantly
reduced in all transgenic lines in comparison with the WT
controls. Only TL1 showed significantly lower plant diameter, total leaf area, and total dry weight, whereas none of
the AtSHI expressing lines showed altered timing of flower
initiation, cyathia abscission or bract necrosis. This study
demonstrated that introduction of the AtSHI gene into poinsettia by genetic engineering can be an effective approach in
controlling plant height without negatively affecting flowering
time. This can help to reduce or avoid the use of toxic growth
retardants of environmental and human health concern. This is
the first report that AtSHI gene was overexpressed in poinsettia and transgenic poinsettia plants with compact growth were
produced.
8:158:30 AM
Ying Huang
Min Xie
Linzhong Zhang
Yunsheng Wang
Jun Sun
Oliver Yu
Wenhao Dai
Congbing Fang*
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
62
Zhijian T. Li
Kyung-Hee Kim
Jiefa Li
Shiping Wang
Wenping Xu
Bo Wang
Xiuming Yu
Lei Wang
Yusui Lou
Qi Yang
9:009:15 AM
(GAs) applications during rapid fruit growth significantly increases sink demand and results in a larger fruit in Pyrus pyrifolia. To better understand the sizing effect of GA on pear fruit,
the pear fruit (Pyrus pyrifolia Nakai cv. Cuiguan) was treated
with GA and differential protein expression were determined by
proteome analysis. Differential in-gel electrophoresis (DIGE),
Matrix-assisted laser-desorption/ionization Time of flight/
Time of flight (MALDI-TOF/TOF) were performed. In this
study, 66 proteins were successfully identified and assigned to
8 functional groups. Among the 66 identified proteins, 9 protein
spots were related to stress response/defense, 7 were associated
with expression regulation and epigenetic, 4 with cell structure,
Fei Chen
Bin Cai
Marianna Fasoli
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
63
Silvia DalSanto
Mario Pezzotti
Liangsheng Zhang
Laura Weieneth
Ajay Nair
8:008:15 AM
Vince Lawson
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
64
8:308:45 AM
8:459:00 AM
Moriah Bilenky
Nick Howell
David Francis
Bizhen Hu
Jennifer Moyseenko
Matthew D. Kleinhenz*
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
65
hydroponically grown greenhouse sweet bell peppers. Ascophyllum nodosum seaweed extract (ASE) treatments in combination
with a standard hydroponic fertilizer were applied to the root
systems of sweet bell pepper plants (Capsicum annuum L. var.
Morraine) through the irrigation system. The growth, flowering,
and fruit production of the ASE treated plants was compared to
fertilizer only treated plants. The yield of ASE-treated plants
was shown to increase by up to 20% during the first 7 weeks
of production. In addition, an increase in quality was observed
in the ASE treatments, with a 37% increase in the number of
peppers graded as being Fancy, as compared to the control.
Also, a significant reduction in the incidence of blossom-end
rot was measured in the ASE treatments. This was attributed to
the higher calcium concentration measured in the tissue of the
ASE-treated pepper plants. These results suggested that ASE
applications promote earliness, increase yields, and improve
the quality of hydroponically grown sweet bell peppers, which
result in a higher economic return for the user.
9:159:30 AM
Jef Achenbach
Laurel Shishkov
Jeffrey Norrie
Charles Barrett
Guilherme B. Buck
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
66
Postharvest
Moderator: Jinwook Lee, Jinwook.Lee@ars.usda.gov
8:008:15 AM
Michael L. Schwieterman
Thomas A. Colquhoun
David G. Clark
Hiroshi Gemma
James W. Olmstead
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
67
Christopher B. Watkins
William B. Miller
SPI for all four cultivars, but linear when plotted over harvest
date. Later in the season the range of starch concentration at
different SPIs varies among and within cultivars, and some of
this variation can be explained by the changing percentage of
amylose of total starch. The percentage of amylose decreases
as the season progresses, in Gala decreasing from 62% to
less than 1% (average 33%), whereas Empire changed from
about 58% to 15% during ripening (average 46%). Honeyrisp
and McIntosh averaged 26.7% and 35.35% amylose, respectively. Those differences in total starch at different SPI levels
could therefore, be related to the ability to stain the starch. At
a very low percentage of amylose the staining is less clearly
visible. Overall, the results suggest that the iodine test can be
less reliable as an indicator of starch in the apple especially
later in the season.
8:459:00 AM
Zora Singh
Alan Payne
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
68
James Mattheis
David Rudell
Jacqueline F. Nock
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
69
Jacqueline F. Nock*
Iftikhar Ahmad
Fajri mango due to large fruit size and being mid to late fruit
maturity has tremendous potential for export. However, its response to cold storage has not been studied. Therefore, present
studies were carried out to study the effect of low temperature
on storage life and quality of Fajri mango. The fruit harvested
David Kohanbash
Todd Martin
John D. Lea-Cox*
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
70
John D. Lea-Cox
Matthew Chappell
John M. Ruter
Erik Lichtenberg
Marc vanIersel
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
71
8:459:00 AM
William L. Bauerle
9:009:15 AM
William L. Bauerle
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
72
9:309:45 AM
John D. Lea-Cox
John Majsztrik
William Bauerle
Marc vanIersel
Erik Lichtenberg
Monica Saavedra
Todd Martin
John D. Lea-Cox
David Kohanbash
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
73
Marc vanIersel
John M. Ruter
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
74
P < 0.001), plant height (r2 = 0.58, P < 0.05), and plant vigor
(r2 = 0.83, P < 0.001). An AFLP-based neighbor-joining cluster
analysis defined five distinct groups consisting of diverse Festuca species (Outgroups; Group 1), F. idahoensis (Group 2),
F. rubra (Group 3), F. ovina and F. valesiaca (Group 4), and
F. trachyphylla (Group 5). The F. valesiaca accessions differed from U.S. Festuca cultivars examined, except for Durar
(F. ovina L.; 6x; sheep fescue), to which they had strong genetic
affinities. Given their morphological attributes, F. valesiaca
PI 659923, W6 30575, PI 659932, and W6 30588 should be
considered for use in low maintenance, semi-arid turf improvement programs in the western United States.
Yingmei Ma
Matthew D. Robbins
10:4511:00 AM
Paul G. Johnson
Steven R. Larson
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
75
among the most popular and widely grown palms for decorative
use in subtropical and tropical landscapes and indoors anywhere,
and several other species are sometimes found in the trade. Recent exploration in Mexico and Central America and research
and evaluation in the Chamaedorea Research Collection in
Los Angeles have revealed several additional species that have
great ornamental promise, including C. benziei, C. frondosa,
C. hooperiana, C. plumosa, and C. rhizomatosa. Some of these
have been in the trade for a few years, especially in California,
and are proving to be outstanding ornamentals while others are
waiting to be introduced. This presentation will illustrate and
discuss these species, addressing their identification, uses, and
cultural requirements.
11:3011:45 AM
James E. Henrich
Ken Greby
Kerry A. Morris
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
76
Pomology
Moderator: Carol A. Miles
10:1510:30 AM
Jonathan Roozen
Jacqueline King
Mario Miranda-Sazo
Karen Hasenoehrl
David Bauermeister
Hard cider sales increased 40% in the United States in 2011, and
there is a need to provide growers with production information
to support this new emerging industry. Apples for hard cider
are mechanically harvested in Europe, with shake-and-sweep
equipment. This study investigated the use of an over-the-row
mechanical raspberry harvester (Littau Model OR0012) with
a trellised planting of Brown Snout cider apple in northwest
Washington. The region is a center for processing raspberry
production and mechanical harvesters sit idle in the fall when
apples are ready for harvest. The study was carried out in 2011
and 2012 at Mount Vernon, WA, trees were planted with 6-ft
in-row and 12-feet between-row spacing, and there were two
replications of M9 and M27 rootstock with 10 trees per plot.
There were no differences due to rootstock (P 0.05) and data
were pooled. Total weight per plot of harvested apples did
not differ between hand and mechanical harvest either year
(P = 0.6127 and P = 0.5666, respectively), however yield
was lower in 2011 than 2012 (100 kg and 26 kg, respectively;
P = 0.0002); Brown Snout is alternate bearing and 2012 was an
off year. Significantly less time was needed for mechanical
harvest than for hand harvest in 2011 (40 hours and 7 hours,
Stephen A. Hoying
Leonel Dominguez
Jose Fachinello
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
77
Cristin Riquelme
Cristin Riquelme
Fang Geng
Gennaro Fazio
John A. Cline
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
78
Luis F. Osorio
Jeremy Pattison
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
79
Mark Trent
GH1: 1.4, GH2: 2.5) was significantly lower than the non-HR
RILs (field: 9.8, GH1: 2.9, GH2: 4.0). Bacterial leaf spot resistance in La Brillante is a simply inherited trait and should
be useful for breeding resistant cultivars.
10:4511:00 AM
Soon-Jae Kwon
Carolee Bull
Ivan Simko
Barbara Hellier
Beiquan Mou
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
80
Eric vandeWeg
Nahla Bassil*
Andrew R. Jamieson
Phillip A. Wadl
Denita Hadziabdic
Chad E. Finn
Umesh Rosyara
James F. Hancock
Robert N. Trigiano
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
81
11:3011:45 AM
11:45 AM12:00 PM
Phillip A. Wadl
Annie Hatmaker
Thomas G. Beckman
W.R. Okie
Jos Chaparro
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
82
Thomas J. Molnar
Josh Honig
Jennifer Vaiciunas
John M. Capik
Eastern filbert blight (EFB) severely limits hazelnut production in the eastern U.S., and its spread to Oregons Willamette
Valley now threatens the primary U.S. commercial hazelnut
production region. Work is currently being done at Rutgers
University to develop commercially acceptable hazelnut cultivars with durable resistance to this disease. An important goal
of the breeding program is the maintenance of genetic diversity
within the breeding lines, which can be assessed using simple
sequence repeat (SSR) markers. In this study, 170 newly selected
EFB-resistant and tolerant seedlings from foreign germplasm
collections, as well as 178 reference cultivars including EFBresistant breeding selections representing a wide spectrum
of geographic origins, were analyzed using 17 genomic SSR
markers. Genetic analysis was performed using the program
STRUCTURE 2.3.3 to confirm prior cluster analysis results, as
well as to discern the most parsimonious number of populations
present within the hazelnut germplasm. Results of the analysis
grouped hazelnuts into 11 populations, and an AMOVA performed using GenAlEx 6.5 showed that the post-facto groups
were all significantly different (P 0.001). This analysis sheds
light on the relationships of the new EFB-resistant seedlings in
comparison to known sources of resistance and other reference
cultivars. Knowing these relationships can allow breeders to
better utilize and maintain a high level of genetic diversity in
their EFB-resistance breeding efforts.
Glenn Israel
Gary R. Bachman
Corey Wheeler
Jeannine May
Beth DAquilla
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
83
Paul Rupp
The limited water situation, rising health costs both at the local
and global arena have forced its population to find alternative
technologies for sustainable and local healthy safe food
production systems which uses less water. Burgeoning population
growth is a significant driver of change in the urban US and many
other cities of the world. The overall challenge is to create a
Lucy K. Bradley
Will E. Hooker
Julieta T. Sherk
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
84
Rapheal Baggett
Ernst Cebert
Udai R Bishnoi
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
85
Lamont Saunders
8:459:00 AM
Moriah Bilenky
Ben Bergum
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
86
Marco Palma
Bhimanagouda S. Patil
The analysis of internal and external forces affecting the Vegetable and Fruit (V&F) programs in Texas A&M AgriLife and
the current state of the Texas V&F industry is the first step in
the development of a strategic planning for the Vegetable and
Fruit Industry in Texas. First, internal knowledge-based regional
workshops were conducted at Uvalde and College Station and
a consolidated online survey was developed for research and
extension faculty engaged in V&F programs. Second, external
regional industry workshops were conducted in four important
V&F growing areas in Texas: McAllen (Lower Rio Grande
Valley), Uvalde (Wintergarden), Lubbock (High Plains), and El
Paso (West Texas). The internal survey questions were grouped
by the level of activity engaged by faculty, by top priorities
issues that needed additional resources to increase AgriLife
impact, and by the specific SWOT components (S = strengths,
W = weaknesses, O = opportunities, T = threats). Furthermore,
the internal survey also provided categorical information of the
respondents such as department affiliation, location, primary
discipline, and professorial rank. The external survey provided
data on specific crops grown, area per crop, type of production
(conventional and/or organic), annual gross sales, marketing
channels and SWOT components. Other data obtained included:
familiarity of growers with Texas A&M AgriLife Research and
Extension, technical assistance sources, programmatic values
of research, extension and educational programs, future breeding, and growers support for programs. Finally, the survey
gave demographic information of the respondents such as age,
gender and number of years in business. A total 87 participants
and 80 stakeholders responded the internal and external survey,
respectively. The external survey instrument was successful
in identifying an important segment of the V&F industry
(95,000 acres) in Texas with a distribution of 75% to 25% of
conventional-organic growers. This presentation will discuss the
level of programmatic pre- and postharvest activities, top priority issues, competitive advantages of the Agency (strengths),
conditions favorable to achieve goals (opportunities), internal
limitations that hinder the Agency progress (weaknesses), and
external conditions harmful in achieving goals (threats). We
will present the main strengths that contribute to the success
of the V&F industry and the broad opportunities for achieving success (i.e. technology advances applied to agriculture,
applied long-term research, education and outreach, pre- and
post-harvest technology advances). We acknowledge J. Landivar, P. Rosson, and M. Dozier as planning committee members
and B. McCutchen, Executive Associate Director, Texas A&M
AgriLife Research.
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
87
B.K. Gugino
K. Demchak
R.P. Marini
8:158:30 AM
Luis F. Osorio
Vance M. Whitaker
Brent Black
Dan Drost
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
88
Anish Malladi
Adrienne Basey
Peter Sturman
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
89
Jeffrey G. Williamson
Rebecca L. Darnell
and flower bud number by 50% from the first to second year,
while the other treatments were stable or increased for these
traits, reflecting the reduction of vigor caused by the lack of
pruning. Early pruning (June) resulted in increased vegetative
growth and flower bud number compared to later pruning (July),
regardless of severity and tipping.
Specified Source(s) of Funding: Florida Blueberry Growers
Association and USDA Specialty Crops Block Grant program
James C. Chatfield
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
90
offered an opportunity to review data during a follow-up lesson. Thirty percent of year one participants were very likely to
continue NN observations while 48% of year two participants
were very likely to continue. Forty percent of participants were
very likely to attend an advanced training on NN and 55% of
second year participants responded positively. Evaluations from
year one indicated a need to be more explicit about phenology
application in gardening. Comments included: This does not
seem helpful for MG, but interesting, information not
relevant to helpingcommunity garden. Conversely after
year two, students better understood phenologys relationship
to gardening. Comments included: makes you more aware,
Very informativemotivate(s) me to record more thanwhen
I hear the first cicada, and Phenology touches everything
brings to lightconnecting you already knowtests your new
insights [that will] make it more meaningful. In conclusion,
effective education materials holistically and explicitly incorporate personal meaning. Directed content creation helps form
an engaged volunteer corps.
Many site-based educators (nature centers, Cooperative Extension, schools, arboretums) struggle with developing and
implementing cohesive projects into their existing programming.
Moreover, projects that are not meaningful to participants often
have little or no long-term impact. The USA National Phenology
Networks (USANPN) Education Program provides phenology
curriculum and outreach to educators in formal, non-formal, and
informal settings. Materials are designed to serve participants
in grades 512, higher education, and adult learners. Phenology education can inform science, environmental, and climate
literacy. Education and educator instruction materials were
designed and field-tested to implement a long-term phenologymonitoring program, Natures Notebook (NN), at sites. Materials
demonstrate how to incorporate monitoring for public visitors,
long-term volunteers, and school groups, while meeting the goals
of USANPN and the site. Materials encourage long-term data
collection, interaction between educators, and offer information
about how educators can ask and answer science questions. Do
site-based NN training materials engage students and meet NN
and Master Gardeners (MG) objectives? Phenology monitoring
was added to Pima MG Training during 2012 and 2013. MGs
receive 4050 education hours and return 4060 volunteer service hours annually. Using this case study as an example, this
talk will demonstrate how to successfully implement NN at a
site. The course was changed during the second year to better
reflect participant needs. Year one content included phenology
and observation using NN. Second year additions included
ecology, biogeography, climate, and garden phenology applications. Both classes collected weekly data for NN and were
Abbey E. Piner
Lucy K. Bradley*
Will E. Hooker
Julieta T. Sherk
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
91
Lucy K. Bradley*
David B. Orr
Frank J. Louws
Paul Pugliese
Melanie Biersmith
Emily Pitts
The growing population and subsequent water demand have coincided with several high impact droughts in the southeast, increasing the pressure on limited water supplies. Water conservation
throughout the region is a necessity and a challenge. The 40 Gallon Challenge web site was created (www.40GallonChallenge.
org) to encourage people to pledge to save 40 gallons of water a
day. Essentially a self-audit checklist, the Challenge provides an
estimate of water savings resulting from the implementation of
conservation practices. Total daily savings are estimated when
the practices are selected. Participants choose practices that fit
their lifestyle, and then pledge to implement them. In the process
of choosing, participants learn how to conserve water and how
much water is used in routine activities. The challenge targets
water conserving horticultural practices including use of rain
barrels, composting, and mulch. It also focuses the participants
attention on low water-use landscaping, irrigation systems and
watering. The tool is effective in changing behavior; 86% of the
respondents to a follow-up survey reported following through
with at least 75% of their pledge. Extension Master Gardeners
have used the Challenge as an educational tool in many venues.
The Challenge may serve as a model for other educational activities. It is flexible and easy to use. It encourages personal reflection of educational messages. Finally, it calculates the impact
of the educators efforts at the county, state and national level.
Specified Source(s) of Funding: Southern Region Water Program
9:159:30 AM
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
92
Emily Eubanks
Lucy K. Bradley
Will E. Hooker
Julieta T. Sherk
Many communities have tried and failed to sustain community gardens, however, permaculture is a framework that can
help promote long-term sustainability. Permaculture gardens
are designed to work with nature to create efficient, resilient
spaces saving time, energy, and money. Despite the potential
for positive impact, minimal research has been conducted on
permaculture in community gardens. In order to assess the use
of permaculture in community gardens a two-part tool was
developed to identify whether and how permaculture is being
used in existing gardens. The tool identifies six key permaculture
systems within community gardens: soil, water, energy, materials, plants/animals, and community/people. Within each system
core elements are listed creating a checklist for assessment. In
the second part of the tool, connections between elements and
systems are identified in a diagram. These interconnections
between elements and systems are the basis of garden resilience
and the ultimate goal of permaculture. The assessment tool was
piloted in existing community gardens and used as a teaching
tool in permaculture workshops. Surveys showed that the tool
increased participants confidence in identifying permaculture
elements and systems.
Teaching Methods
Moderator: James A. Robbins, jrobbins@uaex.edu
8:008:15 AM
D. Thayne Montague
Ashley Elle
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
93
Amy N. Wright
Mengmeng Gu
Jenny Carleo
Jeff Heckman
April Lippet-Faczak
Jennifer Matthews
Meredith Melendez
Barbara ONeill
Nicholas Polanin
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
94
Marc vanIersel
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
95
9:4510:00 AM
9:309:45 AM
The Yuma County Cooperative Extension service plays a significant role in providing a range of information sources to the
agricultural industry through outreach and Extension programming. Littlefield (2000) noted that Arizona vegetable growers
are the main clientele in Cooperative Extension programming,
specifically in desert vegetable research. In addition, agricultural
pest control advisers (PCAs) are provided essential continuing education credits from university programming. Further
clientele who are kept abreast of current research include
industry personnel such as crop production consultants, seed,
fertilizer, and agrichemical industry representatives, pesticide
applicators, equipment manufacturers, storage operators, and
truckers (Littlefield, 2000). The purpose of this study was to
identify the learning styles and preferred methods of receiving
agricultural information on new or innovative farming practices
among Yuma, AZ, area growers, pest control advisors, and industry personnel. A review of the literature suggested there is a
continual need for evaluation of instructional methods and
technology in adult education (Martin & Omer, 1990). Most
studies in adult education in agriculture have focused on the need
for adult education (Creswell & Martin, 1993). Those studies
which have focused on instructional methods recommended
further study was needed on the appropriate methods and tools
to use in adult education programs in agriculture (Creswell &
Martin, 1993). As non-experimental correlational research,
relationships were examined between learning styles and selected demographic characteristics (age, profession, number
of years in the agricultural industry, education, and gender) of
adult continuing agricultural education learners. Relationships
were examined between preferred delivery method and selected
demographic variables (age, profession, number of years in the
agricultural industry, education, and gender) of adult continuing agricultural education learners. Moreover, relationships
were examined between learning styles and preferred delivery
R. Daniel Lineberger
Tim D. Davis
David W. Reed
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
96
9:4510:00 AM
10:0010:15 AM
Ekaterina Jeliazkova
W. Garrett Owen
Dennis Rowe
William C. Fonteno
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
97
Youping Sun
Guihong Bi
Youbin Zheng
Andrew Koeser
Krista Jacobsen
Sven Verlinden
Renee Conneway
Amy Fulcher
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
98
10:4511:00 AM
David Orr
Lucy K. Bradley
Steven Frank
Christopher Moorman
Plant Biotechnology
10:1510:30 AM
Quorum sensing (QS) is a population density-dependent regulatory mechanism, utilizing freely diffusible chemical signal
molecules, which controls a wide range of phenotypes in many
different bacteria. QS plays an essential role in the pathogenesis
of many bacterial pathogens of plants. Both symbiotic and pathogenic bacteria rely on intercellular communication to coordinate
the collective behavior toward the host plant. Mutually, the secretion of particular mimics by the plant might actively alter the
synthesis of Acyl Homoserine Lactones (AHL) by bacteria. The
genes encoding AHL synthesis are often positively regulated by
the receptor for the AHL, leading to self-amplification of AHL
synthesis by bacteria. Thus, the interaction of a plant mimic
compound with an AHL receptor that regulates AHL synthesis
could substantially affect rates of AHL synthesis, positively or
negatively, and thereby affect host responses to the AHL. AHLs
also induced the tissue-specific transcriptional activation of an
auxin-inducible gene. Homoserine lactone is one of the products
of enzymatic degradation of AHLs by soil bacteria. Increased
transpiration, induced by homoserine lactone, should result in
an increased flow of water and nutrients from the bulk soil to
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
99
Mike Mittman
10:3010:45 AM
Dave Wood
Iraida Amaya
Francois Bellon
Thomas M. Davis
Beatrice Denoyes
T. vanDijk
Stephen Ficklin
Amy F. Iezzoni
Sook Jung
Lise Mahoney
Dorrie Main
Amparo Monfort
Cameron Peace
Ali Pirani
Daniel Sargent
Theresa Webster
Y. Yang
H. Zhang
Eric vandeWeg
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
100
Key Laboratory of Cultivation and Protection for NonWood Forest Trees, Ministry of Education, Central South
University of Forestry and Technology, Hunan 410004;
tanxiaofengcn@126.com
Hongxu Long*
Key Laboratory of Cultivation and Protection for NonWood Forest Trees, Ministry of Education, Central South
University of Forestry and Technology, Hunan, 410004;
xiaolong_001004@sina.com
Guixiong Jiang
Lin Zhang
Key Laboratory of Cultivation and Protection for NonWood Forest Trees, Ministry of Education, Central South
University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha,410004;
triwoodtim918@163.com
up-regulation and down-regulation genes have significant difference in 3 development stages of Vernicia fordii seed. Between
Sample 1 and Sample 2, 9,057 up-regulated unigenes and 4,531
down-regulated unigenes were revealed. Between Sample 1 and
Sample 3 there were 21,972 up-regulated unigenes and 2,938
down-regulated unigenes, and 1,468 up-regulated unigenes and
14,069 down-regulated unigenes between Sample 2 and Sample
3. Data presented in the study will constitute an important resource for the data mining of important genes and the research of
regulation and expression mechanism. This study also provides
scientific evidence for breeding of Vernicia fordii.
Specified Source(s) of Funding: This work was supported by the
projects of state forestry research and public service industry
(200904023),Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of
China (10JJ4022), Scientific Research Foundation of Central
South University of Forestry & Technology
11:0011:15 AM
Donglin Zhang
Ioannis Tzanetakis*
Fangfang Yan
11:1511:30 AM
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
101
Frank Y. Yau
Mona Easterling
Stephen J. Gamet
The 2012 growing season presented a rare combination of extremes, a record mild winter followed by the earliest date for
spring bud break on record. Bud break of three to four weeks
before normal averages recorded for numerous locations in
Nebraska contributed to serious problems related to early bud
break. In a few parts of the state, a cold temperature event caused
damage to shoots that had broken bud, but the most serious
problem for many vineyard locations was damage to shoots
from herbicide drift of volatile herbicides. In most cases, this
damage was attributed to 2,4-D. This was the case for one of
our research vineyard locations and led to our evaluating relative damage among a range of 5-year-old grape cultivars and
genotypes. Shoots were rated for foliar damage and stunting of
Collin P. Auwarter
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
102
Juliana Yalemar
Kathleen Kosta
Karen Suslow
Tomas Pastalka
Vernon Huffman
Supriya Sharma
Sibdas Ghosh
Cynthia King
Mark Wright
Andrew Kaufman
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
103
Ben Faber
Anna Howell
Cameron Chandler
Strawberry is a primary crop in five counties in coastal California, with an annual value of $1.4 billion. Strawberry is sensitive
to injury from salts, abundance of which is measured with soil
electrical conductivity (EC). Even though current EC threshold
for yield reduction is 1 dS/m, several strawberry fields have
excellent production in soils with EC 46 dS/m. Thus, we
investigated the specific salt and ion effect on strawberry in
summer and fall-planted bare-root strawberry in typical 1.2 mwide raised beds covered with plastic mulch in clay loam soil
near Santa Paula, CA. Four plants were watered by hand nine
times during initial 3-week establishment period with 250 mL/
plant of one of the four salt solutions (each salt at EC 5, 10, 15,
or 20 dS/m) or with distilled water. At EC 5 dS/m potassium
sulfate or sodium sulfate did not significantly reduce plant size
or fruit production in summer or fall strawberry, while plants
Ayako Kusakabe
The effect of partial rootzone drying (PRD) on growth and physiological responses of 2-year-old grapefruit trees was studied in
two experiments under greenhouse conditions. First, we studied
the effect of different irrigation volumes, including irrigation
above and below tree evapotranspiration (ETc) requirements, in
order to determine how trees respond to excess of irrigation or
to PRD + deficit irrigation (DI) strategies. Four treatments were
applied for 12 weeks: 1) control (100% ETc was applied, 50% on
each pot); 2) PRD 1000 (100% ETc on one side, no water on the
other side); 3) PRD 2000 (200% ETc on one side, no water on
the other side); and 4) PRD+DI 500 (50% ETc on one side, no
water on the other side). All trees had their root system split in
two halves and established in adjacent pots. Soil water content,
tree water status, stomatal conductance, leaf ABA concentration,
chlorophyll fluorescence and tree growth were measured. PRD
200-0 trees used 70% more water than control trees whereas
PRD 100-0 and PRD+DI 50-0 trees decreased water use by 18%
and 79% compared to control trees, respectively. PRD 100-0
or PRD 200-0 did not affect tree growth or any physiological
parameter compared to control trees. Although tree growth was
not affected by PRD+DI 50-0, leaf ABA concentrations and
stomatal closure increased after 10 weeks of the experiment. In
the second experiment, we studied the effect of alternate irrigation between each side of the tree root system. Three treatments
were applied for 10 weeks: 1) control (100% ETc, 50% on each
pot); 2) alternate PRD1 1000 (alternating irrigated/dry rootzones every month); and 3) alternate PRD2 1000 (alternating
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
104
Richard F. Smith
Timothy K. Hartz
Bryon J. Noel
11:0011:15 AM
Gerry Neilsen
Tom Forge
John A. Cline
Snow pack water supply in western North America is increasingly unreliable but improvements in drought forecasting could
allow management using planned water deficits. Crop reduction
is also a potential tool to manage the effects of water stress for
sweet cherry cultivars. The effects of water supply and crop
load management were assessed in two experiments. Experiment 1Skeena and Cristalina on Gisela 6 received 100%
ET replacement atmometer-scheduled drip irrigation either 4
times/day or every second day in 200911. In 2011, crop load
was either 100% or blossom cluster-thinned to 50%. Experiment
2Lapins on Gisela 5 received daily, atmometer-scheduled,
small-radius micro-sprinkler irrigation: 1) 100% ET replacement; 2) 100% ET replacement reduced to 57% ET replacement
from 21 days preharvest; and 3) 100% ET replacement reduced
to 57% ET replacement postharvest. In 2011, crop load was
either 100% or blossom cluster-thinned to 50%. In 2012, crop
load [fruit/cm2 trunk cross-sectional area (TCSA)] effects were
assessed using tree natural variability. High frequency irrigation
increased yield in Skeena and Cristalina in 201011 and fruit
size in 2010. Cluster-thinning in 2011 did not significantly affect
yield, fruit size, or fruit quality for either cultivar. Preharvest
water deficits applied to Lapins on Gisela 5 were mitigated
by cool weather in 2011 and wet weather in 2012. Midday
stem potential of 1.5 to 1.6 MPa in preharvest deficit trees
had no effect on yield or fruit quality in either year. Midday
stem water potential reached 2MPa by the end of the season
in deficit trees. Cluster-thinning in Spring 2011 reduced yield
but did not affect fruit size or fruit quality. Cluster-thinning
and preharvest water deficits in 2011 reduced crop load and
increased fruit size in 2012. In 2011 and 2012, crop load in all
trees was compared to fruit quality. In both years there were
strong inverse relationships between crop load and fruit size
(R2 = 0.85 and 0.78) for unstressed trees, respectively. Soluble
solids content, titratable acidity and stem pull force were also
reduced as crop load increased. In 2012, preharvest deficits,
resulted in significantly smaller fruit when adjusted for crop
load as a covariate. Crop loads of 12 fruit/cm2 TCSA and
22fruit/cm2 TCSA in unstressed trees and 10 fruit/cm2 TCSA
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
105
Performance of Landscape Trees in the SemiArid Southwest under Three Irrigation Regimes
Ursula K. Schuch*
University of Arizona, Tucson; ukschuch@ag.arizona.edu
Edward C. Martin
Tilak Mahato
Jeffrey S. Beasley
Jay Subramani
Magee Shaw
Nine species of landscape trees commonly planted in the semiarid Southwest were irrigated with three different regimes to
determine their growth response and aesthetic functionality.
Irrigation treatments started in May 2010 and were based on
applying 80% (wet), 60% (medium), and 40% (dry) of reference evapotranspiration (ETo) from May to October and half
of that (40%, 30%, and 20% of ETo) from November through
April. Soil moisture data was collected by time domain reflectometry from three species irrigated with the medium
treatment. Soil moisture data were used to calculate crop
coefficients (Kc) which ranged from 0.2 to 0.4 for Prosopis
hybrid (palo verde hybrid), 0.3 and 0.6 for Cupressus arizonica
(Arizona cypress), and 0.3 to 0.7 for Fraxinus velutina
Rio Grande (Rio Grande ash). The three irrigation treatments resulted in different irrigation frequencies. Plants in the
wet treatment received about twice the number of irrigations
compared to plants in the dry treatment. In summer, irrigation
was applied every five, six and seven days, and in winter the
longest interval between irrigations was 77, 94, and 136 days
for the wet, medium, and dry treatment, respectively. Fast
growing species in descending order were palo verde hybrid,
Prosopis velutina (mesquite), Chilopsis linearis (desert willow),
and Pistachio x Red Push (pistache) based on their growth
index. Trunk area was largest for palo verde hybrid trees, followed by pistache, mesquite, desert willow, and Pinus elderica
(Afghan pine). Smallest trees based on growth index and trunk
area were Quercus virginiana (live oak) and Rio Grande ash.
Although all species increased in height, growth index, and
trunk surface area, no significant differences in growth of the
same species receiving the different irrigation treatments were
recorded by October 2012 with the exception of growth index
for live oak. Symptoms of deficit irrigation started to develop
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
106
James E. Ayars
Andrew J. McElrone
Water scarcity, impaired water quality, decreased soil quality, and aberrant weather are listed among the top risks to
grape production in the western United States (Thrupp et al.,
2008). Grapes are the highest value fruit crop produced in the
United States, and all grape products combine to generate an
estimated $162 billion impact on the American economy each
year. Perhaps the most important issue associated with global
warming for California is related to water availability (Weare,
2009). Californias warmer winters and springs have led to
reduced snow-pack, increasing the seasonality of water flows
and directly affecting the ability to grow plants, produce food,
and support growing populations (Allen-Diaz, 2009). This
report describes results from two years of deficit irrigation
of table grapes grown in the San Joaquin and Coachella Valleys. The objective was to determine the effects and limits of
deficit irrigation strategies on vine development, yield, and
grape quality for table grape production. Starting in 2011, two
0.9 ha plots in California were selected, one in Delano in a
Crimson Seedless late maturing table grape and, the other
one in an early season table grape, Sugraone in Mecca. Rows
(westeast oriented) contain 32 vines spaced 2.1 m apart within
the row and 3.6 m between rows. The plots contained 3 rows
with the middle row being the data row. The vines are drip irrigated with one lateral on each vine row with three emitters
per vine each discharging 3.8 L/hour. Three irrigation
treatments were used: T1 as the normal grower practice (GP)
and two deficit irrigated treatments, T2 and T3, as a percentage reduction of GP during specific growth stages. In 2011, no
differences between treatments in terms of yield were achieved
in any location even with reductions of applied water of 5%
and 10% for T2 and T3, respectively, for both varieties. During
2012, the Sugraone harvest data demonstrated largest yields
for T2 and no effect in Crimson Seedless even with reductions near to 22% less water in the entire season. In terms of
fruit quality, positive effects were found for deficit treatments,
achieving highest values for soluble solids in Sugraone T2,
both years, and Crimson Seedless T3 in 2011. Improvements
in color development were also significant in this late season
table grape both years, parameter extremely important in this
variety.
Nursery Crops
Moderator: Alison Stoven OConnor,
astoven@larimer.org
11:1511:30 AM
Anthony J. Koski
James E. Klett
Daniel K. Struve
The most commonly used container type for nursery tree production is the black plastic (BP) container. The longer trees remain
growing in BP, the greater the potential for the development
of circling and malformed roots. Root injury sustained during
production may negatively affect tree health when planted in
the landscape. Research at Colorado State University used
Pyrus calleryana Decene. Glens Form (Chanticleer) to
compare tree production using two non-conventional, fabric
container types, Root Pouch (RP), and Smart Pot (SP), with
BP containers to determine the effects of container type on tree
roots following transplant in the landscape. After growing in a
nursery production setting, trees were planted into bluegrass turf
in Fall 2010 and Spring 2012. Post-transplant success of trees
was determined during the growing season using pre-dawn leaf
water potential and infrared leaf canopy temperature to detect
stress. Trees were harvested in Fall 2011 and 2012 using an air
spade (after one and two growing seasons) to evaluate transplant
establishment using growth measurements (e.g. root and shoot
re-growth, leaf area, height, caliper, and branching). In 2011
and 2012, there were no significant container effects on height,
caliper, root:shoot ratio, and dry leaf, shoot, and root weight. In
addition, there were no container effects on pre-dawn leaf water
potential and infrared canopy temperature. In 2012 there were
significant container effects for average root re-growth beyond
the original root ball: BP had 17.5% root re-growth compared
to 30.2% and 29.4% for RP and SP, respectively. There were
no significant differences for root re-growth in 2011 (8.4% BP,
10.6% RP, and 10.2% SP). Though there were no significant differences in 2012 for above-ground growth, nor dry root weight,
root re-growth and visual root architecture differed among the
three container types. One preliminary conclusion from this
study is that you cannot predict below-ground establishment
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
107
Guihong Bi
Amy Fulcher
Robert L. Geneve
Genhua Niu
test plant growth and water use in containers made from material
other than virgin plastic. From July 2011 to June 2012, Euonymus
fortunei Roemertwo were planted in three types of #1 (~3.8
L) containers (treatments) and evaluated. Container treatments
were: 1) polyethylene PF400-SM (control); 2) Western Pulp
7X7RD (WP); and 3) Kord 07.50 Fiber Pot (Kord). From June
2012 to May 2013, Buxus x Green Velvet were evaluated in
four types of #1 containers: 1) control; 2) WP; 3) root pouch
1520 month (RP) 4) keratin pot (KP). Substrate volumetric
moisture content (SVMC) was determined by EC-5 moisture
sensors in 2011, GS3 and EC-5 sensors in 2012 (Decagon Devices, Inc., Pullman, WA). Plant daily water use (DWU) was
calculated as SVMC 5 minutes after irrigation minus SVMC
immediately before the following irrigation period multiplied
by container volume. Plants were irrigated to replace 100%
DWU. For E. fortunei, in all states, plant growth and biomass
were not different between treatments. A higher mortality rate
in plastic than Kord and WP container was observed at the end
of 2011 growing season. The DWU for WP and Kord varied
by states in both years. The root zone temperature of KP was
similar to control, and for WP and RP was 9% and 15% lower
than control in Michigan, container temperature in other states
varied. Mortality of Buxus was 0% for all states by October
2012; mortality will be evaluated in May 2013.
11:45 AM12:00 PM
Bert Cregg
Mathieu Ngouajio
Pascal Nzokou
Sven Verlinden
T. Kijchavengku
Rafael Auras
Susmitha Nambuthiri
Renee Conneway
Youping Sun
This one-factor completely randomized experiment was conducted in Michigan, Kentucky, Mississippi, and Texas, in order to
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
108
Drew Zwart
Soo-Hyung Kim
Phytophthora diseases are a major limiting factor to crop, forest, and amenity plant growth worldwide. Canker pathogens
can affect net CO2 assimilation (An) though phloem and xylem
infections. While prior studies have shown that Phytophthora
canker infections limit An, reports regarding the underlying
mechanisms are variable. One possible pathway is through
lowering CO2 supply by reduced stomatal (gs) and mesophyll
conductance (gm). Our objective of this study was to quantify
CO2 supply limitations in response to P. cactorum inoculations
in red maple (Acer rubrum). We hypothesized that the inoculated
plants will reduce both gs and gm, compared with the noninoculated controls. We tested this hypothesis using the two
methods to determine gs and gm: 1) a method combining leaf
gas exchange, chlorophyll fluorescence, and the biochemical
model of photosynthesis; and 2) a method utilizing the photosynthesis model with leaf gas-exchange measurements made
at the two O2 concentrations (2% and 21%). Our results show
that gs and gm in the maple leaves decreased due to P. cactorum
inoculations, leading to the limitation of CO2 supply to the site
of carboxylation. The two different gm estimation methods
produced comparable gm values and similar response patterns.
Specified Source(s) of Funding: The F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert
Company
12:451:00 PM
Soo-Hyung Kim
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
109
and H2O2 at 100 ppm (Oxidate) with each oxidant mixed with
two different surfactants (EA and Sarc.). The kidney bean plant
growth and morphology responses were total leaf area, specific
leaf area, total fresh weight, total oven dry weight, and relative
growth rate, as averaged across the six plants. The plants were
harvested at 48 to 51 days after planting to take the growth
and leaf morphology data. Each of the study factors (chemical
treatment, inoculation date, and inoculation status) interacted
with each other (two, 2-way interactions) in three out of the
six main plant growth responses. The total above-ground dry
biomass response increased by 35% and 24% for the noninoculated and inoculated plants, respectively, when the plants
were sprayed with EB plus sarcosinate surfactant, at nine days
after planting. The study results show that oxidant disinfectants
sprayed before the plants were inoculated had increased plant
growth. Also, the oxidant disinfectants show some promise
for signaling/stimulating natural plant defenses against foliar
injury from the bacterial wilt. Future studies should focus on
the most effective treatments and increase the number of plant
replications in order to reduce variation between treatments.
1:151:30 PM
1:001:15 PM
Heather Hammack
Hye-Ji Kim
Hong Liao
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
110
Scott Finlayson
Daniel Leskovar*
1:452:00 PM
Hideyasu Fujiyama
Organic Horticulture
Moderator: Brian Ward, bw@clemson.edu
12:3012:45 PM
Douglas A. Cox
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
111
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
112
1:151:30 PM
1:301:45 PM
Mathieu Ngouajio
Neil Mattson
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
113
Helen Atthowe
William Snyder
Michelle Wander
The goal of this project is to improve the environmental, economic, and social sustainability of organic vegetable farms
by facilitating the understanding and adoption of effective,
research- and farm-based, systems approaches to soil and pest
management. These methods are needed to manage critical and
seemingly intractable soil/pest problems such as aphids, nitrogen
supply, diseases, and weeds, as well as interrelationships amongst
these factors. Draft FSAs have been developed of two Oregon
and one Montana organic vegetable farms that a) are pushing
Plasticulture
12:3012:45 PM
Karen Kritz
The New Jersey Department of Agricultures (NJDA) first efforts at recycling agricultural plastics started in 1991 with baling
greenhouse and nursery film. The effort was not successful as
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
114
High tunnels are unheated structures for growing high value crops
over an extended season. Over the past few years, researchers at
Mississippi State University (MSU) have studied several aspects
of high tunnel production. Our program started out with a grant
to investigate using secondary covers in tunnels for production
of warm season crops over the winter. The research portion
of this study included three replicate tunnels at two university
locations, plus training tunnels at two grower sites. A critical
aspect of this research was strict adherence to the temperature
control protocol for venting the tunnels and using the secondary
covers. The main research finding was that we could significantly
improve crop survival and overall performance with secondary
covers in our climate. We also learned that proper management
of the openings of the tunnels could reduce but not eliminate
high wind damage to these temporary structures. The project
was successful in terms of its extension and teaching outcomes
and impacts. It resulted in thousands of contacts, more than a
dozen field days, several individual tours. The state of Mississippi now has more than 200 high tunnels at least in part due to
this project, and several enduring partnerships between MSU
scientists and those in surrounding states were forged out of this
project. The project PI has appeared on national television, and
the team has partnered in the creation of several web outreach
sites and publications, and made over twenty scientific presentations to five different scientific societies.
12:451:00 PM
Debra Inglis
Guihong Bi
Mengmeng Gu
Vasile Cerven
Carol A. Miles
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
115
Lincoln Zotarelli
Lucas Paranhos
Carol A. Miles
Karen Leonas
H. Liu
Guilherme B. Buck
Mihai Giurcanu
Arnold Saxton
Debra Inglis
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
116
Barclay Poling
Shawn Wright
Floriculture
Moderator: Alicain S. Carlson, ascarlso@ncsu.edu
12:3012:45 PM
Timothy E. Elkner
Dahlias are a popular floriculture crop and are grown as herbaceous perennials, potted plants, cut flowers and for tuber production. Specific nutritional guidelines have not been developed in
order to optimize container production. Proper information on
fertilization rates and tissue nutrient concentrations are required
to maximize productivity and quality for growers. The objectives of this research were to establish base line nitrogen (N)
and potassium (K) fertilization rates as well as tissue nutrient
concentrations to maximize plant quality while minimizing over
fertilization. Dahlia Magic Moment plants were field produced
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
117
Carolyn A. Bartuska
Robert F. Weidman
Raul I. Cabrera*
E. IsraelSilva Hernndez
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
118
John M. Dole
1:301:45 PM
Kenneth McCabe
Gowrishanker Srinivasan
Kyle Haubrich
David Grewell
Samy Madbouly
Michael Kessler
William Graves
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
119
Thien Ho
Ioannis Tzanetakis*
Hao Zhu
George Allen
John M. Dole
Bryon Sosinski
John D. Williamson
Rose bent neck and petal blueing are major problems that decrease
cut rose postharvest quality, but the molecular mechanisms that
occur during these processes are unknown. To begin to understand
the changes, we compared gene expression patterns using RNAsequencing (RNA-seq). The cDNA libraries of Rosa Freedom
and Forever Young were synthesized from both healthy cut
rose flowers and flowers that were at different stages of bent
neck and petal blueing. The cDNA libraries of Freedom healthy
neck (DHN) and Freedom bent neck stage 1 (DBN) were
sequenced by Illumina GAIIx sequencing platform. Contigs
were assembled de novo from expression sequence tags of DHN
and DBN and compared. Initial analysis showed an increased
expression of cell wall degradation, abscission and stress related
genes indicating that rose bent neck might be a combined effect of water stress and accelerated abscission of the peduncle.
Specified Source(s) of Funding: Dole Fresh Flowers, Dept.
of Horticultural Science and College of Agticulture and Life
Sciences
2:152:30 PM
Julia L. Kornegay
John M. Dole
Charles Safley
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
120
Gordon Groover
Jarrad Farris
Hard cider is a burgeoning part of the alcoholic beverage industry. To make a premium hard apple cider product, commercial
cider-makers desire apple cultivars with high tannin, high acid,
and/or high sugar content. Some commercially grown apples,
R. Karina Gallardo
Chengyan Yue
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
121
Vicki McCracken
James Luby
James R. McFerson
Ines Hanrahan
Ben Campbell
Yizao Liu
The terms local and organic are becoming common in most retail
environments, especially in the merchandising of produce. Recent
studies have examined the perceptions and misperceptions of
these terms, as well as shown that consumers are willing to pay
price premiums for produce. Another area of research has focused
on the consumer characteristics that drive increased purchasing
of local and organic. However, little to no research has examined
how consumer characteristics are impacting the tradeoffs between
local and organic purchasing in the marketplace. The objective
of this study was to understand how various consumer charac-
Ben Campbell
Hayk Khachatrayn
Charles R. Hall
Jennifer Dennis
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
122
Jean-Marc Gandonou
Robin Brumfield*
Fredy Ballen
Jonathan H. Crane
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
123
Allen V. Barker
Md J. Meagy
Emad Jahanzad
Carl E. Sams
Malcolm M. Manners
Ty G. McDonald
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
124
Chammi Attanayake
Rebecca E. Stein
Phillip Defoe
Sabine Martin
Gary M. Pierzynski
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
125
Michele A. Schermann
Annette L. Wszelaki*
Gretchen L. Wall
Susannah K. Amundson
Food safety is every growers responsibility, however, identifying and prioritizing food safety risks on the farm is often
difficult. While there are many food safety resources and templates offering guidance on practices to reduce risks, most do
not explain how to assess risks or how to prioritize which food
safety practices should be put in place first. Not all risks are
the same and farm resources are limited. Understanding how
to prioritize the implementation of food safety practices that
reduce the biggest risks is important to farm viability and safety.
In this project, Decision Tree Portfolios were developed to help
fruit and vegetable growers assess on-farm risks and write farm
food safety plans that guide and prioritize the implementation of
Good Agricultural Practices (GAPs). Microbial contamination
of fruits and vegetables in the field and packinghouse can come
from many sources, such as wild and domestic animals, water,
soil amendments, workers, and adjacent land. To address the
diversity of risks, ten Decision Tree Portfolios were developed:
Worker Health and Hygiene Training; Wildlife and Animal
Management; Biological Soil Amendments; Non-biological Soil
Amendments; Agricultural Water for Production; Agricultural
Water for Postharvest Use; Previous and Adjacent Land Use;
Sanitation Practices; Transportation; and Traceability. Each Decision Tree Portfolio contains an overview of the topic, a decision
tree for assessing risks, food safety template language, sample
standard operating procedures, sample log sheets for recording
food safety practices, and references for additional resources.
Initial development and review of the Decision Tree Portfolios
was guided by an advisory group of growers, extension educators, topic-specific experts, and government personnel. Focus
groups were conducted with growers in Minnesota, New York,
and Tennessee to evaluate the final Decision Tree Portfolios for
usability and functionality. Educational materials will be disseminated through nationwide train-the-trainer workshops for
agricultural extension educators as well as through workshops
with fruit and vegetable growers, with particular emphasis on
small and medium scale growers, including Amish, organic, and
direct-to-market growers.
Specified Source(s) of Funding: USDANIFSI
2:453:00 PM
Bhimanagouda S. Patil
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
126
Xin Zhao
Charles A. Sims
3:153:30 PM
Ram M. Uckoo
G.K. Jayaprakasha
Bhimanagouda S. Patil
Onions are valued for their distinctive flavor and recognized for
their potential health benefits. Pungency of onions is a major
criterion for economic remuneration and it can be quantified by
measuring the enzymatically produced pyruvic acid. The pyruvic
acid content is signicantly inuenced by the variety, location,
and their interaction with the environment. Approximately, 80%
of the total variation is caused is due to genetic differences in
the onions. This is a major problem to the cultivators in maintaining the produce quality of mild onions. Therefore, accurate
measurement of pyruvic acid is critical. In the present study, a
rapid colorimetric method using automated microplate reader
was developed to determine pyruvic acid in onions. In brief,
onion samples were treated with 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine
followed by potassium hydroxide (KOH) to produce a colored
adduct. The absorbance of the colored complex was read at 485
nm using a micro plate reader. KOH enhanced the stability of
the colored complex up to two hours. The developed method is
simple, robust, economical and reproducible for routine determination of pungency in large number of onions. The method
can be applied to determine the level of pyruvic acid content in
different onion cultivars. This project is based upon work supported by the USDANIFA # 2010-34402-20875 Designing
Foods for Health through the Vegetable & Fruit Improvement
Center, Texas.
Specified Source(s) of Funding: This project is based upon work
supported by the USDA-NIFA # 2010-34402-20875 Designing
Foods for Health through the Vegetable & Fruit Improvement
Center-TX
3:303:45 PM
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
127
Bianca Smith
Yaguang Luo
G.K. Jayaprakasha
Qin Wang
Suresh D Pillai
Kevin M. Crosby
Bhimanagouda S. Patil
Maintaining the postharvest quality (including health promoting properties) of fresh cut cantaloupes is essential for both
the consumers and the produce industry. Fresh cut cantaloupe
fruits were packed in ambient, modified atmosphere (MA) and
treated with or without low doses of electron beam irradiation
(0.82 kGy). The treated cut fruits were analyzed for quality parameters including titratable acidity, color, Brix, sugar content,
and microbial bio-burden at periodic intervals during storage at
4 C. Modified atmosphere and e-beam irradiation treatments
had a significant effect on the quality of fruits during the storage
period. Sugars (glucose and fructose) were significantly higher
in e-beam treated fruit packed under MA than the untreated
fruit packed under ambient conditions. No significant variation
in the color and titratable acidity were observed during storage.
However, low dose e-beam treatment of fresh-cut cantaloupe
reduced the microbial load (by 12 logs) compared to the control
samples. When MA was coupled with e-beam treatment, the cut
fruit maintained a lower microbial load for over 8 days compared
to the irradiated samples in ambient conditions. E-beam treatment and MA together showed the greatest potential to reduce
bio-burden and extend shelf life of fresh-cut cantaloupe without
affecting quality. This project is based upon work supported by
the USDANIFA # 2010-34402-20875 Designing Foods for
Health through the Vegetable & Fruit Improvement Center, Texas.
Microgreens (seedlings of green vegetables and herbs) are gaining in popularity as a new culinary ingredient, providing intense
flavors, vivid colors, and crisp texture when added to salads and
other food preparations. Although microgreens would inherently
be regarded as a healthy addition to the diet, no information is
available on their nutritional content. The present study determined the concentrations of essential vitamins or provitamins
A, C, E, and K1 in 25 commercially available microgreens.
Results showed that different microgreens provide widely varying amounts of the four vitamins, but regardless they generally
have significantly higher concentrations of these phytonutrients
in comparison with mature leaves from the same plant species.
These phytonutrient data provide the first scientific basis for
evaluating nutritional benefits of microgreens and, when included
in the USDA food composition database, can be used by health
agencies and consumers to make educated choices about inclusion of microgreens as part of a healthy diet.
Frederick Marmor
Paul Silverman
3:454:00 PM
Liu Xiaozhong
Zhenlei Xiao
Peter D. Petracek
Daniel Leep
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
128
Rob Fritts
Gregory Venburg
Johan Pienaar
Jozsef Racsko
Alan DeYoung
Sacha Johnson
Debra Inglis
Growth, yield, fruit quality, and potential tolerance to Verticillium wilt were compared among non-grafted, self-grafted, and
grafted triploid watermelon Crispn Sweet, and heirloom
tomato Cherokee Purple. Watermelon rootstocks were bottle
gourd and Strong Tosa while tomato rootstocks were Beaufort and Maxifort. Field trials were carried out in 2010 and
2011 at Hermiston and Eltopia (eastern Oregon and Washington, respectively), and Mount Vernon (western Washington).
At Mount Vernon, watermelon grafted onto Emphasis and
Strong Tosa had significantly larger stem diameter than nongrafted and self-grafted plants both years, while there were no
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
129
Carrot (Daucus carota L.) is one of the top-ten most economically important vegetables crops in the world. Turkey is one
of the worlds most important carrot producers with its annual
production of 300,000 to 400,000 tons. Seed-borne bacterial
pathogens of carrot cause important damage on yield and seed
quality on plants. In this study, infested bacteria were determined
on some carrot seeds sown in Turkey. Different orange and
black varieties of carrot seeds were collected from the Eregli
and Kasnhan districts of Konya province, Turkeys largest
carrot-producing regions. Subsamples of 10,000 seeds were
soaked overnight at 5 C in 100 mL sterile saline (0.85% NaCl)
with 0.02% Tween 20. A ten-fold dilution series was prepared
from each seed soak extract and 100 L of each dilution and
the undiluted extract were spread in triplicate on yeast dextrose
calcium carbonate agar (YDCA), Kings B medium (KB), tryptic
soy agar (TSA). Morphological, biochemical, physiological,
and molecular methods were used for identification of isolated
bacteria. Pathogenicity tests of strains were performed on black
and orange carrots, and all strains induced a hypersensitive
response in tobacco plants. Obtaining pathogenic and beneficial bacteria strains were identified from Pseudomonaceae,
Bacillaceae, and Enterobacteriaceae families. It is important to
determine the level of disease incidence in fields and alert the
farmers to apply quarantine regulations. The next stage of this
study will be to determine their agronomic importance on carrot
production in Turkey.
3:153:30 PM
Jose G. Franco*
Stephen R. King
Astrid Volder
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
130
Aliah Irvine
Ki-Cheol Son
Aarthi Padmanabhan
Dioreme Navasca
Sang Mi Lee
A-Young Lee
Ho-Sang Lee
Kwan-Suk Lee
Candice Shoemaker
For health benefits, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Sports Medicine suggested
physical activity recommendation based on many research
evidences. In adults, at least 30 min of moderate intensity physical activity and at least 60 min of moderate to high intensity
physical activity for children on the most days of the week are
recommended. To utilize gardening as a physical activity for
health benefits, there is limited information regarding metabolic
equivalents for various gardening tasks especially in children
and adults. Therefore, this study was to investigate the metabolic costs of 10 gardening tasks in children and adults. Fifteen
Korean children aged 13 to 14 years and 15 Korean adults in
the twenties in the community of Cheongju, South Korea were
volunteered in this study. All participants were conducted a total
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
131
2:453:00 PM
3:003:15 PM
Seong-Sil Kim
Carolyn W. Robinson
Ki-Cheol Son
Donald J. Eakes
In our lifetime, we establish various relationships with different people from different groups. Building and maintaining
desirable social relations is a key to living a happy life. In the
case of senior elementary students, amicable peer relationships
help them to fulfill developmental goals such as socialization.
However, if they are rejected by their peers, it could lead to
serious maladaptive problems. Thus, in this study, we will
assess the effectiveness of school gardening program (from
sowing to harvesting) for promoting social relations among
elementary students in the fifth and sixth grades. The sample
used for this study included fifth and sixth grade students from 4
elementary schools in Wonju, which have similar environmental
conditions. The experimental group consisted of 123 students
(62 boys, 61 girls), four 5th and 6th grade classes. The control
group included 123 students (boy 62, girl 61), four 5th and
6th grade classes. This gardening program included activities
from sowing through harvesting and was designed to develop
peer status, peer relationships and sociality. The program was
embedded in the school curriculum and included 90 minutes per
week for 10-week, from April 16 through June 25. Classrooms
and outside school garden (about 70 m2) were used for the
program. The treatment students were divided into groups (5
to 6 members) by pre-peer status. Results were analyzed using
SPSS 19.0. ANCOVA (Analysis of covariance) was conducted
to test difference of sociality scale, peer relation scale between
the experimental and control groups. Frequency analysis was
used for peer status scale. Firstly, the school gardening program brought about meaningful differences in both durability
of friendship (P < 0.039) and adaptability between friends
(P < 0.029), subfactors of peer relationship, of the experimental
David Williams
Robert E. Lyons
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
132
Stephanie Short
Corey Ballard
Daniel J. Schmitz
Yael Vodovotz
Matthew D. Kleinhenz*
Candice Shoemaker*
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
133
Cynthia Domenghini
George Milliken
Gregory Welk
David A. Dzewaltowski
Pomology
Moderator: Clive Kaiser, clive.kaiser@oregonstate.edu
2:152:30 PM
Leonard Coop
Kevin Masterson
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
134
W.C. Bridges
2:453:00 PM
Lincoln Zotarelli
Matthew Ross
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
135
Mary Lu Arpaia
Harley Smith
Avocado, specifically the Hass cultivar, is known for its alternate bearing tendency. This study focused on examining
alternate bearing at the single shoot level, across seasons and
considering vegetative and reproductive growth. Four-year
old Hass avocado trees grafted onto Duke 7 clonal rootstock in a commercial avocado grove in De Luz, CA, were
selected by similar size and bloom intensity. Individual shoots
(N = 260) were tagged and followed for 3 years (201012)
after dividing the trees into two groups (N = 8 per treatment).
Trees in the first group (thinned) had all inflorescences
manually removed from the tree during the 2010 flowering
period. The second group of trees served as a control and were
allowed to flower and set fruit without intervention. There was
a clear difference between the thinned and the control group
where the former exhibited longer shoots and higher bloom
intensities than the latter. Furthermore, we observed that there
were very few shoots which set fruit in consecutive years
(0.1%). This indicates that alternate bearing in Hass avocado
occurs at the shoot level rather than on a whole tree level. We
also observed a similar pattern of reduction in shoot length
and bloom intensity when shoots did not bear any fruit for two
consecutive seasons regardless of treatment. The significance
of these results on alternate bearing patterns in Hass avocado
will be discussed.
3:153:30 PM
Neil O. Anderson
Emily Tepe
John Tillman
All species and cultivars within the genus Prunus are difficult to
root. Thus, most cultivated accessions are grafted for propagule
increase. The University of Minnesota Prunus germplasm and
cultivar releases include a variety of ornamental and edible types
that have received little research focus. Many accessions have
never been evaluated for their ability to root, even though at
least one sour cherry, P. cerasus Northstar, is not grafted and
sold on its own rootstock. Two experiments were conducted
to evaluate if cutting position, time of year, or auxin treatment
were important for terminal and basal softwood-semi-hardwood
rooting success of: I) P. xcistena (control); P. armeniaca
David Gibeaut
Late winter and early spring freeze events can have devastating
impacts on tree fruit production. Our primary objective was to
determine the critical temperatures resulting in 10%, 50%, and
90% reproductive bud mortality at distinct phenology stages of
sweet cherry and European pear cultivars from late dormancy
through anthesis. A secondary objective was to phenotype
the variability in reproductive bud development throughout
this period. Samples were collected from two sites, weekly,
beginning in mid-January through petal fall on commercially
important cultivars of sweet cherry [Sweetheart, Skeena,
Regina and Bing (standard)] and European pear [Bosc,
dAnjou, Starkrimson, and Bartlett (standard)]. All buds
were frozen at 1 C per hour. Ice nucleation temperatures of
sweet cherry floral buds were detected by a high-throughput
differential thermal analysis (DTA) system between dormancy
and first swelling (earliest visible stage of bud development).
Subsequent to bud swelling, DTA lost the capacity to accurately
detect individual flower exotherms; therefore, bud hardiness of
advanced phenology stages was based on the visible presence
or absence of oxidative browning following freezing. Ice nucleation events within dormant and transitioning pear buds were
not detectable during freezing. We experimentally established
that water migration from buds, presumably to extracellular ice,
was the cause of this; hence, microscopy was used to assess
pear flower bud hardiness throughout the entire developmental
period. Anthers and pistils of both cherry and pear flowers were
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
136
Leland Glenna
Avinash Kak
Johnny Park
Tony Koselka
Anouk Patel-Campillo
James R. Schupp
Clark F. Seavert
Julie M. Tarara
Bret Wallach
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
137
Propagation
Moderator: Donglin Zhang, donglin@uga.edu
2:453:00 PM
Bruce Dunn
Eric Stafne
Jinying Dong
Zhihui Li
Renae E. Moran
Donglin Zhang
3:003:15 PM
Donglin Zhang*
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
138
the same site for control. Above and below ground biomass was
determined by harvesting a subset of plants per soil treatment
and rootstock at 11, 17, and 23 weeks after planting. A subset
of plants was used to track root dynamics during the growing
season (13 weeks). Root observation windows were digitally
photographed at 7-day intervals from shortly after planting to
the final harvest. Rootstocks grown in PS grew significantly
more than those in FS, but there were no differences in growth
above ground between rootstocks. Total root biomass, first
and second order roots, and second-to-first order root ratio
were higher in CG6210 rootstocks than in M26 in both soil
treatments. First order roots of M26 were larger in diameter
and had higher N content than those of CG.6210 under FS and
PS. Roots of M26 and CG.6210 were larger in diameter and
had lower C content under PS than FS. Under FS, lifespan of
M26 roots was significantly longer than those of CG.6210,
and the mortality risk of M26 roots was 56% that of CG6210
roots. However, there were no differences on root lifespan or
root mortality risk between rootstocks under PS. Differences
in root production and lifespan might be linked to differences
in resources allocation to production of defense compounds
versus to plant growth.
3:303:45 PM
Bryan Emmett
Taryn Bauerle
Apple replant disease (ARD) is a soil-borne disease that affects young apple trees in many replanted orchards around the
world. Symptoms of ARD are observed soon after planting
and include, among others, stunted growth above ground,
reduction in root biomass, and root tip necrosis. Due to the
complex etiology and multiple causal agents of ARD, there
is a limited understanding of the disease development on the
fine-root system, as well as the dynamics that lead to effective
plant defense or susceptibility of rootstocks in replant sites.
The goal of this study is to identify morphological and physiological differences between susceptible and resistance/tolerant
rootstocks and induced changes in the traits when grown in
ARD soil. We hypothesized that rootstock resistance/tolerance
to ARD is supported by higher root growth rate, higher turnover
of tissues, and higher number of growing tips. In an outdoor
nursery, seedlings of M.26 rootstock (previously shown to be
susceptible to ARD) and clonal rootstock liners of CG.6210
(previously shown to perform well in replant sites) were grown
in soil from an ARD site (FS) and in pasteurized soil (PS) from
3:454:00 PM
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
139
Richard F. Smith
3:003:15 PM
Florida grows 33,600 acres tomatoes and the total yearly value
is more than $520 million; accounting for 65% of the value of
the crop in the nation. Florida tomatoes are grown primarily in
sandy soil, which has low water-holding capacity and high nutrient leaching due to its coarse-sized particles. A soil surfactant,
however, is a surface-active substance with both hydrophilic
(water-loving, polar) and lipophilic (fat-loving, apolar) properties like soaps and detergents. These amphiphilic properties can
significantly improve soil quality, reduce water repellency, and
increase the capacity for holding water and nutrients in sandy
soil. The objectives of this research were to: 1) evaluate the effect of a surfactant on nutrient use efficiency and 2) assess the
yield enhancement of the surfactant on tomatoes grown in sandy
soil. This research was conducted in a hyperthermic, uncoated
Typic Quartzipsamments (USDA, 1979) sandy soil in UF/IFAS
Plant Science Research and Education Unit, near Citra, FL, in
Fall 2012. Prior to planting, fertilizers (lb/acre) were applied
and incorporated into soil: 160 N (as urea), 83 P2O5 (as triple
superphosphate), and 250 K2O (as muriate of potash). There were
two surfactant rates: 0 (control) and 30 (treatment) lb/acre (as
Stockosorb 660). Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. var.
Phoenix) seedlings were planted in 12.5 m2 (135 ft2) plots with
three replicates and irrigated with drip and plastic mulch. Nutrient
use efficiency (lb/lb) was defined as tomato yield increment per
pound of applied nutrients. The plant size of the treatment was
15% greater in both height and diameter than the control. Tomato
yields of the control and treatment were 99,017 and 57,738 lb/
acre, respectively. The marketable yield of the treatment was
84% greater than that of the control. Large, medium, and small
tomatoes of the treatment were 192%, 102%, and 38% greater
than those of the control. Nutrient use efficiencies of N, P, and
K were 252, 485, and 162 and 123, 236, and 79 lb/lb for the
treatment and control, respectively. These results indicate that
soil surfactant significantly increases plant growth, yield, and
nutrient use efficiency of the tested tomato cultivar.
3:153:30 PM
Milton E. McGiffen,Jr.
Donald J. Merhaut
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
140
Paul V. Nelson
Brian E. Whipker
Dean Hesterberg
Wei Shi
Dave Dickey
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
141
4:004:15 PM
John Montoya
The purpose of this discussion is to examine two successful attempts at university-wide composting initiatives in the United
States: Bobcat Blend at Texas State University in San Marcos,
TX, and a composting program at the University of Hawaii at
Manoa. Initially funded in 2006 through partnership with the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Bobcat Blend is one
of the only student-operated composting programs in the nation
and won awards from the Texas Commission on Environmental
Quality (TCEQ) in both 2012 and 2013. Students manage education of students and staff, food waste management, compost
creation and sales of compost to university faculty and local
community gardens. The composting program at the University
of Hawaii at Manoa was initially funded in 2012 by a University
of Hawaii at Manoa Graduate Student Organization Greening
Initiative Grant. The Graduate Student Organization of the University of Hawaii, Manoa campus created the Campus Greening
program in order to move the campus toward more sustainable
environmental practices. The grant was awarded to the student
organization SOFT (Student Organic Farm Training) and provided stipends for the students involved. Similar to the Texas
Gwendolyn Hustvedt
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
142
B
Baameur, Aziz............................................................ 140
Babadoost, Mohammad............................................. 129
Bachie, Oli G............................................................... 13
Bachman, Gary R......................................................... 83
Baggett, Rapheal.......................................................... 85
Bai, Jinhe...................................................................... 10
Bai, Xianjin.................................................................. 41
Balal, Rashad M..................................................... 60, 61
Baldwin, Elizabeth................................................. 10, 29
Ballard, Corey............................................................ 133
Ballen, Fredy.............................................................. 123
Bang, Haejeen........................................................ 55, 56
Barker, Allen V........................................................... 124
Barnard, Dave M.................................................... 32, 72
Barnes, Jared.............................................................. 141
Barnett, LoriAnne........................................................ 91
Barrett, Charles.................................................... 66, 116
Barrett, James E................................................... 34, 118
Bartoshuk, Linda.......................................................... 10
Bartuska, Carolyn A............................................. 34, 118
Basey, Adrienne........................................................... 89
Bassil, Nahla.................................................... 45, 79, 81
Bastas, KubilayKurtulus......................... 47, 76, 99, 130
Batley, Jacquline............................................................ 5
Bauerle, Taryn............................................................ 139
Bauerle, William.............................................. 32, 72, 73
Bauermeister, David..................................................... 77
Baugher, Tara Auxt.................................................... 137
Bauske, Ellen............................................................... 92
Bayer, Amanda....................................................... 74, 95
Beasley, Jeffrey S....................................................... 106
Beaudry, Randolph................................................. 12, 27
Beaulieu, John C........................................................ 125
Beckman, Thomas G.................................................... 82
Beeks, Stephanie........................................................ 113
Behe, BridgetK................................................... 49, 122
Belayneh, Bruk E................................................... 33, 71
Bellon, Francois......................................................... 100
Bennett, Pamela J......................................................... 90
Bergefurd, Brad R...................................................... 117
Bergum, Ben................................................................ 86
Betancourt, Jorge-Edwin.............................................. 54
Bi, Guihong............................................ 34, 98, 108, 115
Biersmith, Melanie....................................................... 92
Bihn, Elizabeth........................................................... 126
Bilenky, Moriah..................................................... 65, 86
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
143
Bink, Marco................................................................. 45
Bishnoi, Udai R............................................................ 85
Bjrkman, Thomas....................................................... 17
Black, Brent................................................................. 88
Blazich, Frank A.......................................................... 36
Blenda, Anna................................................................ 49
Blom, Theo J.M......................................................... 141
Boucherle, Robert........................................................ 49
Boue, Stephen................................................................ 3
Bradley, Lucy K....................... 48, 84, 90, 91, 92, 93, 99
Brainard, Daniel C....................................................... 14
Brantley, Ryan.............................................................. 27
Bravo, Carolina............................................................ 28
Brecht, Jeffrey K.................................................... 10, 29
Brennan, Eric............................................................. 130
Bridges, W.C.............................................................. 135
Browne, Greg............................................................... 24
Brown, J. Wyatt............................................................ 27
Brown, Susan K........................................................... 45
Brumfield, Robin................................................. 94, 123
Buchanan, David.......................................................... 11
Buck, Guilherme B.............................................. 66, 116
Bull, Carolee................................................................ 80
Bumgarner, Natalie.............................................. 65, 133
Bush, Edward W.................................................. 24, 106
C
Cabrera, Raul I........................................................... 118
Cade, Tina Waliczek.............................. 3, 102, 123, 142
Cahn, Michael D........................................................ 105
Cai, Bin........................................................................ 63
Callahan, Ann............................................................... 44
Cambardella, Cynthia.................................................. 13
Campbell, Ben............................................................ 122
Cantrell, Charles.............................................. 45, 46, 47
Cantwell, Marita I.................................................. 27, 28
Capik, John M........................................................ 23, 83
Carleo, Jenny................................................................ 94
Carlson, Alicain S...................................... 117, 119, 120
Carpenter, Brandon...................................................... 64
Carrera, Ricardo R....................................................... 59
Carrillo, Lilian............................................................ 121
Castle, William S......................................................... 22
Castro, Sarah................................................................ 44
Cebert, Ernst................................................................ 85
Cerven, Vasile............................................................ 115
Chandler, Cameron.................................................... 104
Chang, Hsueh-yuan...................................................... 28
Chaparro, Jos.............................................................. 82
Chappell, Matthew....................................................... 71
Chatfield, James C....................................................... 90
Chaudhary, Priyanka R.......................................... 12, 21
Chavez, Dario J............................................................ 82
Chen, Chunxian............................................................ 50
Chen, Fei...................................................................... 63
Cheng, Chun-Huai....................................................... 49
Cheng, Zong-Ming................................................. 62, 63
Chica, Eduardo J.......................................................... 59
Clarke, Jihong Liu........................................................ 62
Clark, David G....................................................... 10, 67
Cline, John A........................................................ 78, 105
Cohan, Steven.............................................................. 31
Coker, Christine E........................................................ 83
Collins, Pamela............................................................ 97
Colquhoun, Jed............................................................ 42
Colquhoun, Thomas A............................................. 9, 67
Combe, Shannon............................................................ 3
Conneway, Renee................................................. 98, 108
Contreras, Carolina...................................................... 12
Cook, Amber.................................................................. 3
Coolong, Timothy W.................................................... 85
Coop, Leonard............................................................ 134
Countryman, Janie....................................................... 11
Cowan, Jeremy........................................... 114, 115, 116
Cox, Douglas A.......................................................... 111
Crane, Jonathan H.......................................... 23, 37, 123
Crawford, Lauren......................................................... 73
Cregg, Bert........................................................... 74, 108
Crosby, Kevin M........................................................ 128
Crutchfield, Elizabeth................................................ 140
Cuello, Joel L............................................................... 39
D
DAquilla, Beth............................................................ 83
Da, Kedong.................................................................. 51
daSilva, Jorge.............................................................. 37
Dai, Wenhao................................................................. 62
DalSanto, Silvia.......................................................... 64
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
144
Daley, James.................................................................. 3
Daley, Shawna.............................................................. 52
Daniels, Alex B............................................................ 32
Dardick, Chris.............................................................. 44
Darnell, Rebecca L................................................. 41, 90
Dattilo, Adam J.............................................................. 6
Daugovish, Oleg........................................................ 104
Davis, Audrey L........................................................... 40
Davis, Jeanine M.......................................................... 17
Davis, Thomas M....................................................... 100
Davis, Tim D................................................................ 96
Dean, Deborah............................................................. 81
Defoe, Phillip............................................................. 125
DeJong, Ted M............................................................. 44
Delate, Kathleen........................................................... 13
Deligoz, Ayse............................................................... 60
Deltsidis, Angelos I...................................................... 10
Demchak, K................................................................. 88
Deng, Zhanao............................................................... 25
Dennis, Jennifer......................................................... 122
Denoyes, Beatrice...................................................... 100
Dervishian, Geoffrey...................................................... 7
DeVetter, Lisa Wasko................................................... 42
DeYoung, Alan........................................................... 129
DiBello, Patrick......................................................... 120
Dickey, Dave.............................................................. 141
Dobres, Michael........................................................... 25
Doerflinger, Franziska C.............................................. 68
Dole, John M.......................................... 35, 36, 119, 120
Doll, David................................................................... 24
Domenghini, Cynthia................................................. 134
Dominguez, Leonel...................................................... 77
Dove, Sue............................................................... 30, 32
Drost, Dan.................................................................... 88
Dunn, Bruce......................................................... 51, 138
Dzakovich, Michael....................................................... 1
Dzewaltowski, David A............................................. 134
E
Eakes, Donald J.......................................................... 132
Easterling, Mona........................................................ 102
Eaton, Touria E.................................................. 111, 124
Ebel, Roland........................................................... 15, 16
Einhorn, Todd............................................................. 136
El-Hout, Nael............................................................... 37
Elkner, Timothy E...................................................... 117
Elle, Ashley.................................................................. 93
Emmett, Bryan........................................................... 139
Ernest, Emmalea Garver.............................................. 87
Eubanks, Emily............................................................ 93
Evans, Edward........................................................... 123
Evans, Katherine........................................ 43, 44, 45, 49
Evans, William B................................................. 15, 115
F
Faber, Ben.................................................................. 104
Fachinello, Jose............................................................ 77
Fang, Congbing............................................................ 62
Farish-Williford, Hannah............................................. 51
Farnham, MarkW........................................................ 17
Farris, Jarrad.............................................................. 121
Fasoli, Marianna.......................................................... 63
Fazio, Gennaro............................................................. 78
Feibert, Erik B.G.......................................................... 86
Fennimore, Steven A.................................................... 24
Fernandez, Rodney Thomas....................................... 108
Ferrari, Thomas............................................................ 53
Ficklin, Stephen................................................... 49, 100
Finlayson, Scott......................................................... 111
Finn, Chad E................................................................ 81
Fleener, Ann............................................................... 132
Flinn, Barry.................................................................. 51
Fonteno, William C...................................................... 97
Foor, Ryan M............................................................... 96
Forge, Tom................................................................. 105
Francis, David........................................................ 55, 65
Franco, Jose G............................................................ 130
Frank, Steven............................................................... 99
Frantz, Jonathan M....................................................... 49
Freeborn, John R............................................................ 2
Fritts, Rob.................................................................. 129
Fritz, Vincent A............................................................ 16
Fujiyama, Hideyasu................................................... 111
Fulcher, Amy........................................................ 98, 108
G
Gajanayake, Bandara................................................... 58
Gallardo, R. Karina.................................................... 121
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
145
H
Hadziabdic, Denita................................................... 6, 81
Hall, Charles R..................................................... 49, 122
Hammack, Heather.................................................... 110
Hancock, James F......................................................... 81
Hanrahan, Ines........................................................... 122
Hanson, Bradley D....................................................... 24
Harbut, Rebecca........................................................... 42
Hardner, Craig M..................................................... 5, 43
Harkess, Richard L....................................................... 34
Harshman, Julia............................................................ 45
Hartz, Timothy K....................................................... 105
Hasenoehrl, Karen........................................................ 77
Hasing, Tomas................................................................ 4
Hassell, Richard L.................................................... 3, 52
Hatmaker, Annie.......................................................... 82
Hatterman-Valenti, Harlene....................................... 102
Haubrich, Kyle........................................................... 119
Hayden, Zachary D...................................................... 14
Hayes, Ryan J............................................................... 80
He, Dongxian............................................................... 55
He, Jianjun................................................................... 41
Heckman, Jeff.............................................................. 94
Hellier, Barbara............................................................ 80
Henrich, ames E........................................................... 76
Henry, Mary E.............................................................. 83
Hernndez, E. IsraelSilva.......................................... 118
Hernndez, Ricardo...................................................... 20
Hesterberg, Dean........................................................ 141
Hettiarachchi, Ganga M............................................. 125
Hirst, Peter M............................................................. 137
Ho, Thien........................................................... 101, 120
Honig, Josh.................................................................. 83
Hooker, Will E................................................. 84, 91, 93
Horgan, ThomasE................................................. 45, 46
Hodel, Donald R.................................................... 74, 76
Hoover, Emily............................................................ 136
Hoshino, Takanori........................................................ 39
Howell, Anna............................................................. 104
Howell, Nick................................................................ 65
Howland, Amanda........................................................ 39
Hoying, Stephen A....................................................... 77
Huang, Ying................................................................. 62
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
146
Hu, Bizhen................................................................... 65
Huffman, Vernon........................................................ 103
Hustvedt, Gwendolyn................................................ 142
Hutchinson, Margaret Jesang....................................... 67
Hutton, Mark................................................................ 17
Hutton, Samuel F......................................................... 56
Hyun, Soo Jung............................................................ 26
I
Iezzoni, AmyF............................................... 43, 45, 100
Inglis, Debra............................................... 115, 116, 129
Ingram, Dewayne L................................................... 109
Ingrao, Adam.................................................................. 2
Iqbal, Zafar................................................................... 61
Ireland, Shubha.............................................................. 3
Irvine, Aliah............................................................... 131
Israel, Glenn................................................................. 83
J
Jackson, Brian.............................................................. 97
Jackson, Jeremiah.......................................................... 3
Jacobsen, Krista........................................................... 98
Jahanzad, Emad.......................................................... 124
Jamieson, Andrew R.................................................... 81
Jaworski, Elizabeth A................................................... 10
Jayaprakasha, G.K......................... 12, 21, 126, 127, 128
Jeannette, Karen........................................................... 92
Jeliazkova, Ekaterina................................. 45, 46, 47, 97
Jeliazkov, Valtcho D............................................... 46, 47
Jeong, Jighan................................................................ 50
Jha, Ajay....................................................................... 84
Jiang, Guixiong.......................................................... 101
Jifon, John L.......................................................... 13, 37
Johnson, Andrew J....................................................... 24
Johnson, Daniel............................................................ 39
Johnson, Gordon C................................................ 85, 87
Johnson, Sacha........................................................... 129
Jiang, Cai-Zhong.......................................................... 11
Johnson, Paul G........................................................... 75
Jung, Sook............................................................ 49, 100
K
Kaiser, Clive............................................................... 134
Kak, Avinash.............................................................. 137
Kantor, George............................................................. 70
Kaufman, Andrew.............................................. 103, 131
Kaufman, Leyla.......................................................... 103
Kennedy, Colleen........................................................... 4
Kessler, Michael......................................................... 119
Khachatrayn, Hayk.................................................... 122
Khan, Ahmad Sattar..................................................... 70
Khan, Muhammad Mumtaz......................................... 61
Khan, Shamim A.K.U.................................................. 68
Kietikul, Trisha............................................................ 11
Kijchavengku, T......................................................... 108
Kim, Hye-Ji................................................................ 110
Kim, Jongyun......................................................... 32, 33
Kim, Ki Sun................................................................. 36
Kim, Kyung-Hee.......................................................... 63
Kim, Seong-Sil........................................................... 132
Kim, Shin Young.......................................................... 36
Kim, Soo-Hyung.................................................. 50, 109
Kim, Soo-Ock.............................................................. 50
Kim, Sun...................................................................... 26
Kim, Sunggil................................................................ 56
King, Cynthia............................................................. 103
King, Jacqueline........................................................... 77
King, StephenR......................................................... 130
Kleinhenz, Matthew D......................................... 65, 133
Klett, James E............................................................ 107
Kline, Wesley L.......................................................... 114
Koc, Ismail........................................................... 60, 108
Koeser, Andrew............................................................ 98
Kohanbash, David.................................................. 70, 73
Kopsell, David............................................................... 1
Kopsell, DeanA..................................................... 17, 19
Kornegay, Julia L................................................. 48, 120
Koselka, Tony............................................................ 137
Koski, Anthony J........................................................ 107
Kosta, Kathleen.......................................................... 103
Kovaleski, Alisson Pacheco......................................... 90
Kritz, Karen................................................................ 114
Kroggel, Mark A.......................................................... 52
Kubota, Chieri.......................................................... 1, 52
Kudo, Keita.................................................................. 57
Kulkarni, Akshata...................................................... 127
Kurtural, S.Kaan........................................................... 7
Kusakabe, Ayako........................................................ 104
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
147
Kwon, Soon-Jae........................................................... 80
L
LaBonte, Don............................................................... 17
Larson, Steven R.......................................................... 75
Lavely, E.K.................................................................. 88
Lawson, Vince.............................................................. 64
Layne, Desmond R....................................................... 49
Lea-Cox, John D............................ 31, 32, 33, 70, 71, 73
Lee, A-Young............................................................. 131
Lee, Chiwon W............................................................ 51
Lee, Ho-Sang............................................................. 131
Lee, Jinwook.......................................................... 67, 69
Lee, Kwan-Suk.......................................................... 131
Lee, Sang Mi.............................................................. 131
Lee, Seung Youn.......................................................... 36
Lee, Taein..................................................................... 49
Leep, Daniel............................................................... 128
Legendre, Reeve.......................................................... 17
Leisso, Rachel.............................................................. 11
Leonas, Karen............................................................ 116
Leonhardt, Ken W.................................................. 25, 26
Leskovar, Daniel............................................ 56, 87, 111
Lester, Gene E...................................................... 13, 128
Li, Jiefa.................................................................. 41, 63
Li, Xinxin................................................................... 110
Li, ZhijianT................................................................. 63
Liao, Hong................................................................. 110
Lichtenberg, Erik............................................. 33, 71, 73
Ling, Peter.............................................................. 48, 49
Lippet-Faczak, April.................................................... 94
Little, Holly.................................................................... 7
Liu, Guodong............................................................. 140
Liu, H......................................................................... 116
Liu, Yizao................................................................... 122
Lineberger, R. Daniel................................................... 96
Loayza, Francisco........................................................ 29
Lobos, Gustavo............................................................ 28
Lohr, Virginia I............................................................. 95
Long, Hongxu............................................................ 101
Lopez, Roberto G......................................................... 36
Louws, Frank J............................................................. 92
Lou, Yusui.................................................................... 63
Luby, James.................................................... 43, 45, 122
M
Macnish, Andrew J....................................................... 11
Madbouly, Samy........................................................ 119
Mahato, Tilak............................................................. 106
Mahoney, Lise............................................................ 100
Main, Dorrie......................................................... 50, 100
Majsztrik, John....................................................... 33, 73
Malik, Aman Ullah....................................................... 70
Malik, Babar................................................................ 48
Malladi, Anish.............................................................. 89
Mangandi, Jozer........................................................... 88
Marcial, Edgardo Zalazar........................................... 118
Marini, R.P............................................................. 79, 88
Marmor, Frederick..................................................... 128
Marshall, Sam.............................................................. 99
Martin, Edward C....................................................... 106
Martin, Jeffrey T........................................................... 14
Martin, Robert.............................................................. 40
Martin, Sabine............................................................ 125
Martin, Todd........................................................... 70, 73
Ma, Shen...................................................................... 18
Ma, Yingmei................................................................. 75
Masterson, Kevin....................................................... 134
Mathey, Megan M........................................................ 81
Mattheis, James...................................................... 11, 69
Matthews, Jennifer....................................................... 94
Mattson, Neil........................................................ 61, 113
Maughan, Tiffany......................................................... 88
Manners, Malcolm M................................................. 124
Mayer, Newton Alex.................................................. 135
May, Jeannine.............................................................. 83
McCabe, Kenneth...................................................... 119
McCall, Ingram............................................................ 35
McConachie, Ian............................................................ 5
McCracken, Vicki...................................................... 122
McCreight, James D............................................... 17, 18
McDonald, Ty G........................................................ 124
McElrone, Andrew J.................................................. 107
McFerson, James R.............................................. 45, 122
McGiffen, Milton E............................................. 13, 140
McKee, John................................................................ 46
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
148
N
Nackley, Lloyd............................................................. 50
Nair, Ajay......................................................... 64, 65, 86
Nambuthiri, Susmitha................................................ 108
Natwick, Eric T............................................................ 18
Navasca, Dioreme...................................................... 131
Nawaz, Muhammad Azher........................................... 48
O
OConnor, AlisonStoven........................................... 107
ONeill, Barbara........................................................... 94
Okie, W.R..................................................................... 82
Olmstead, James W................................................ 41, 67
Onuaguluchi, Demitrius................................................. 3
Oraguzie, Nnadozie...................................................... 49
Orcheski, Benjamin...................................................... 45
Orr, David.............................................................. 92, 99
Olmstead, Mercy A.......................................... 7, 49, 135
Osorio, Luis F......................................................... 79, 88
Osuna, Pedro................................................................ 38
Owen, James S............................................................. 30
Owen, W. Garrett......................................................... 97
Owings, Allen D.................................................... 24, 75
Owino, Willis Omondi................................................. 67
zkan, Burhan........................................................... 123
P
Padmanabhan, Aarthi................................................. 131
Palma, Marco............................................................... 87
Palta, Jiwan P............................................. 19, 21, 54, 58
Panicker, Girish Kumar................................................ 15
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
149
Panthee, Dilip............................................................... 55
Paranhos, Lucas......................................................... 116
Park, Sin-Ae....................................................... 131, 132
Park, Johnny............................................................... 137
Pastalka, Tomas.......................................................... 103
Patel-Campillo, Anouk............................................... 137
Patil, Bhimanagouda S..12, 21, 56, 57, 87, 126, 127, 128
Patterson, Bradley.......................................................... 3
Pattison, Jeremy........................................................... 79
Payne, Alan.................................................................. 68
Peace, Cameron.............................. 5, 43, 44, 45, 49, 100
Peck, Gregory Michael.............................................. 121
Pereira, Marlon C.T................................................ 23, 37
Peres, Natalia A.............................................................. 4
Prez, Alma R.Sols.................................................. 118
Pervez, MuhammadAslam.................................... 60, 61
Peterson, Bryan J........................................................... 6
Petracek, Peter D........................................................ 128
Pezzotti, Mario............................................................. 64
Pienaar, Johan............................................................ 129
Pierzynski, Gary M.................................................... 125
Pillai, Suresh D.......................................................... 128
Pinares, Ania................................................................ 38
Piner, Abbey E................................................. 84, 91, 93
Pirani, Ali................................................................... 100
Pitts, Emily................................................................... 92
Pliakoni, Eleni D.......................................................... 10
Plotto, Anne................................................................. 10
Polanin, Nicholas......................................................... 94
Poling, Barclay........................................................... 117
Pugliese, Paul............................................................... 92
Q
Qi, Lingqiao............................................................... 122
R
Racsko, Jozsef............................................................ 129
Radovich, TheodoreJ.K............................................ 124
Raines, Doug................................................................ 44
Ramirez-Godoy, Augusto............................................. 54
Ramsey, Craig.................................................... 109, 110
Randall, Wesley........................................................... 36
Rankin, Aimee A.......................................................... 92
Ratnayaka, Harish.......................................................... 3
S
Saavedra, Monica................................................... 33, 73
Sabanadzovic, Nina Abou-Ghanem............................. 40
Sabanadzovic, Sead...................................................... 40
Sabatino, Leo............................................................... 52
Safley, Charles............................................................ 120
Salazar, Brent............................................................... 52
Sams, Carl E................................................... 17, 19, 124
Sanchez-Canro, Diego-Leonardo................................. 54
Snchez, Eduardo Fuentes......................................... 118
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
150
Sim, Sung-Chur........................................................... 55
Singh, Zora................................................................... 68
Skinkis, Patricia A........................................................ 39
Sloan, Crofton.............................................................. 46
Smith, Bianca............................................................. 128
Smith, Harley............................................................. 136
Smith, Richard F................................................ 105, 140
Smith, Samantha.......................................................... 51
Snyder, William......................................................... 114
Son, Ki-Cheol.................................................... 131, 132
Sosinski, Bryon.......................................................... 120
Spalholz, Hans............................................................... 1
Srinivasan, Chinnathambi............................................ 44
Srinivasan, Gowrishanker.......................................... 119
Stafne, Eric................................................................. 138
Stanphill, Stephen........................................................ 51
Starry, Olyssa................................................... 30, 31, 32
Stegmeir, Travis........................................................... 43
Stein, Rebecca E........................................................ 125
Staub, Jack E................................................................ 75
Stone, Alexandra........................................................ 114
Struve, Daniel K......................................................... 107
Sturman, Peter.............................................................. 89
Subramani, Jay........................................................... 106
Sugar, David................................................................. 29
Sugimoto, Itsumi.......................................................... 57
Sun, Jun........................................................................ 62
Suslow, Karen............................................................ 103
Sun, Youping.................................................. 38, 98, 108
T
Takeda, Fumiomi......................................................... 40
Tan, Xiao-Feng.......................................................... 101
Tarara, Julie M........................................................... 137
Taylor, Matthew D..................................................... 117
Tepe, Emily................................................................ 136
Termizi, Ainnantul Ahmad............................................. 5
Testezlaf, Roberto........................................................ 31
Thekke-Veetil, Thanuja................................................ 40
Thomas, Paul.......................................................... 30, 71
Thull, John R................................................................ 16
Tillman, John............................................................. 136
Tornielli, Giovanni Battista.......................................... 63
Trader, Brian................................................................ 51
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
151
Trent, Mark.................................................................. 80
Trigiano, Robert N............................................. 6, 81, 82
Tzanetakis, Ioannis................................ 40, 99, 101, 120
U
Uckoo, Ram M........................................................... 127
Uno, Yuichi.................................................................. 57
V
Vaiciunas, Jennifer....................................................... 83
vandeWeg, Eric............................................ 45, 81, 100
vanDeynze, Allen........................................................ 55
vanDijk, T.................................................................. 100
vanIersel, Marc................. 30, 31, 32, 35, 71, 73, 74, 95
VanDerZanden, Ann Marie.......................................... 95
Vanzie-Canton, Susana D............................................. 25
Vashisth, Tripti............................................................. 89
Venburg, Gregory....................................................... 129
Vendrame, Wagner........................................... 23, 37, 38
Vercillo, Diana............................................................... 1
Verlinden, Sven.................................................... 98, 108
Verma, Sujeet............................................................... 44
Vodovotz, Yael........................................................... 133
Volder, Astrid............................................................. 130
W
Wadl, Phillip A................................................... 6, 81, 82
Wallach, Bret.............................................................. 137
Wall, Gretchen L........................................................ 126
Wander, Michelle....................................................... 114
Wang, Bo................................................................ 41, 63
Wang, Kevin Y........................................................... 101
Wang, Lei..................................................................... 63
Wang, Qin.................................................................. 128
Wang, Xueni.............................................................. 108
Wang, Yan.............................................................. 27, 29
Wang, Yunsheng........................................................... 62
Wang, Shiping........................................................ 41, 63
Wang, Xin.................................................................... 62
Ward, Brian........................................................ 111, 112
Warmund, MicheleR............................................. 39, 40
Warren, Peter................................................................ 91
Watkins, Christopher B.............................. 11, 68, 69, 70
X
Xiao, Zhenlei.............................................................. 128
Xiaozhong, Liu.......................................................... 128
Xie, Min....................................................................... 62
Xu, Ran...................................................................... 111
Xu, Wenping.......................................................... 41, 63
Y
Yalemar, Juliana......................................................... 103
Yan, Fangfang............................................................ 101
Yang, Qi....................................................................... 63
Yang, WeiQiang.................................................... 88, 89
Yang, Y....................................................................... 100
Yao, Shengrui............................................................... 22
Yau, Frank Y............................................................... 102
Yildiz, Dilek................................................................. 59
Yoder, Aaron.............................................................. 113
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
152
Yonezawa, Nobushige.................................................. 57
Yue, Chengyan..................................................... 49, 121
Yumbya, Penina Mueni................................................ 67
Yun, Jin I...................................................................... 50
Yu, Oliver..................................................................... 62
Yu, Xiuming........................................................... 41, 63
Z
Zajicek, Jayne M............................................................ 3
Zasada, Inga................................................................. 39
Zhang, Caixi........................................................... 41, 63
Zhang, Donglin.................................................. 101, 138
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
2013 ASHS Annual ConferenceOral Session Abstracts
153
An asterisk (*) following a name indicates the presenting author. The schedule is subject to change.
154