Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 99 views

    Defense of Research Proposal: Evaluation: Note: Excellent: 5 Very Good: 4 Good: 3 Fair: 2

    Uploaded by

    Joel Mangallay
    This document contains an evaluation form for assessing a student's defense of a research proposal. The form evaluates the student's introduction, literature review, research methodology, feasibility of preliminary results, and overall performance. Each section is worth 20% of the total grade. The examiner will decide if the defense was satisfactory, satisfactory with minor amendments, or unsatisfactory based on an overall score out of 100. Written comments must be provided if the decision is anything other than satisfactory.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Defense of Research Proposal: Evaluation: Note: Excellent: 5 Very Good: 4 Good: 3 Fair: 2

    Uploaded by

    Joel Mangallay
    99 views2 pages
    This document contains an evaluation form for assessing a student's defense of a research proposal. The form evaluates the student's introduction, literature review, research methodology, feasibility of preliminary results, and overall performance. Each section is worth 20% of the total grade. The examiner will decide if the defense was satisfactory, satisfactory with minor amendments, or unsatisfactory based on an overall score out of 100. Written comments must be provided if the decision is anything other than satisfactory.

    Original Description:

    cr

    Original Title

    Criteria

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document contains an evaluation form for assessing a student's defense of a research proposal. The form evaluates the student's introduction, literature review, research methodology, feasibility of preliminary results, and overall performance. Each section is worth 20% of the total grade. The examiner will decide if the defense was satisfactory, satisfactory with minor amendments, or unsatisfactory based on an overall score out of 100. Written comments must be provided if the decision is anything other than satisfactory.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    99 views2 pages

    Defense of Research Proposal: Evaluation: Note: Excellent: 5 Very Good: 4 Good: 3 Fair: 2

    Uploaded by

    Joel Mangallay
    This document contains an evaluation form for assessing a student's defense of a research proposal. The form evaluates the student's introduction, literature review, research methodology, feasibility of preliminary results, and overall performance. Each section is worth 20% of the total grade. The examiner will decide if the defense was satisfactory, satisfactory with minor amendments, or unsatisfactory based on an overall score out of 100. Written comments must be provided if the decision is anything other than satisfactory.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 2

    ALEJO M.

    PACALSO MEMORIAL NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL


    DEFENSE OF RESEARCH PROPOSAL: EVALUATION
    (To be used by Individual Examiner)

    Name of Candidates Student ID


    No.

    Subject Date

    Research Title

    Practical Research II GRADE

    * Note: Excellent: 5 Very Good: 4 Good: 3 Fair: 2 Poor: 1


    Actual Marks
    Weight Marks (B)
    Item Evaluation Criteria (B)
    (A) (1 - 5)* (A)
    5

    Introduction
    1. 20
    (Background information, problem statements, aims/objectives)
    Literature Review
    2. (Relevant literatures, reasonable review parameter, recent 20
    development, organization of issues etc.)
    Research Methodology
    3. 20
    (Description of method, experimental design, etc.)
    Feasibility of Study and Preliminary Results
    4. (in terms of scope, time, resources & practicality; observation to 20
    date, presentation statistical analysis, graphs, tables, etc)
    Overall Performance
    5. 20
    (Presentation skills, shows confidence during Q&A session, etc.)

    Total
    100
    (Note: The marks are as guidance for examiner to make the overall decision)

    OVERALL DECISION SATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY # #

    (Tick the appropriate box) With minor amendments/ (less than 50 marks)
    comments to improve the
    objectives, problem statement,
    work plan of research, etc.
    #
    Written comments must be provided if decision is either one of these two categories.
    Comments for candidates reference/improvement:
    ________________________________________________________________________________
    ________________________________________________________________________________
    ________________________________________________________________________________
    ________________________________________________________________________________
    Signature of Examiner : ______________________

    Name of Examiner : ________________________ Date : ___________________

    You might also like