Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Hip Joint M&al/Polymer Constrained Cemented or Uncemented Prosthesis Draft Guidance For Industry and FDA
Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Hip Joint M&al/Polymer Constrained Cemented or Uncemented Prosthesis Draft Guidance For Industry and FDA
Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Hip Joint M&al/Polymer Constrained Cemented or Uncemented Prosthesis Draft Guidance For Industry and FDA
Preface
Public Comment
For 90 days following the date ,of publication in the Federal Register of the notice
announcing the availability of this guidance, comments and suggestions regarding
this document should be submitted to the Docket No. assigned to that notice,
Dockets Management Branch, Division of Management Systems and Policy,
Office of Human Resources and Management Services, Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Room 1061, (ISA-305), Rockville, MD 20852.
Additional Copies
Background
This guidance document was developed as a special control guidance to support the
reclassification of the hip joint metal/polymer constrained cemented or uncemented prosthesis
into class II. This guidance will be issued in conjunction with a Federal Register notice
announcing the proposal to reclassify this device type. This guidance is issued for comment
purposes only. If a final rule to reclassify this device type is not issued, this guidance document
will not be issued as a special control.
FDA believes that special controls, when combined with the general controls, will be sufficient
to provide reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the hip joint metal/polymer
constrained cemented or uncemented prosthesis. If the device is reclassified, a manufacturer who
intends to market a device of this generic type must (1) conform with the general controls of the
Food, Drug & Cosmetic Act, including the 510(k) requirements described in 21 CFR 807.8 1, (2)
address the specific risks to health associated with the hip joint metal/polymer constrained
cemented or uncemented prosthesis, and (3) receive a substantial equivalence determination from
FDA prior to marketing the device.
This special control guidance document identifies the classification, product code, and
classification definition for the generic hip joint metal/polymer constrained cemented or
uncemented prosthesis. In addition, it identifies the risks to health and serves as the special
control that, when followed and combined with the general controls, will generally address the
risks associated with this generic device type and lead to a timely 5 1O(k) review and clearance.
For the specific content requirements of a 5 1O(k) submission, preparers of submissions should
refer to 21 CFR 807.87 and other agency documents on this topic.
page 1
D+aft - Not for Implementation
Scope
FDA identifies the generic hip joint metal/polymer constrained cemented or uncemented
prosthesis as an orthopedic device classified under 21 CFR 888.33 10, product code KWZ. A hip
joint metal/polymer constrained cemented or uncemented prosthesis is intended to replace a hip
joint. The device prevents dislocation in more than one anatomic plane and has components that
are linked together. This generic type of device includes prostheses that have a femoral
component made of alloys, such as cobalt-chromium-molybdenum, and an acetabular component
made of ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene with or without a metal shell made of alloys,
such as cobalt-chromium-molybdenum and titanium alloys. This generic type of device is
intended for use with or without bone cement (888.3027).
Risks to Health
FDA has identified the following four risks to health associated with the use of the hip joint
metal/polymer constrained cemented or uncemented prosthesis:
1. infection
2. adverse tissue reaction
3. pain and/or loss of function
4. revision
The.guidance documents, consensus standards, and labeling statements that follow will help
manufacturers address the identified risks to health.
Controls
FDA believes that this special control will address the above identified risks to health associated
with the use of the device. Manufacturers attempting to establish that their hip joint
metal/polymer constrained cemented or uncemented prosthesis is substantially equivalent to a
predicate hip joint metal/polymer constrained cemented or uncemented prosthesis device should
demonstrate that their device complies with either the specific recommendations of this guidance
or with an alternate means to establish equivalent safety and effectiveness .of their device.
Manufacturers who reference recognized standards as part of their 5 1O(k) submission should
provide statements regarding conformance or Declarations of Conformity under the FDA
Modernization Act of 1997. Because statements afford greater flexibility for device developers
than Declarations of Conformity, submitters of 5 1O(k)s should consider using guidance
documents and consensus standards in this manner. For information regarding declarations of
conformity, refer to FDAs Guidance on Recognition and Use of Consensus Standards, which
is available on our website at http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/modact/k982.html.
The FDA guidance documents, which present FDAs current thinking, and consensus standards
listed below will contribute to the design, manufacture, and clearance of safe and effective hip
prosthesis: They also will help manufacturers address material concerns and performance testing
page 2
Draft - Not for Implementation
methods for the device to reduce the identified risks associated with use of the .device. The
labeling statements listed below will provide information to practitioners that will contribute to
safe and effective use of the device.
a. Guidance Document for Testing Orthopedic Implants with Modified Metallic Surfaces
Apposing Bone or Bone Cement
b. Guidance Document for Testing Non-articulating, Mechanically Locked Modular
Implant Components
c. Draft Guidance Document for the Preparation of Premarket Notification (5 1O(k))
Applications for Orthopedic Devices-The Basic Elements
d. Data Requirements for Ultrahigh Molecular Weight Polyethylene (UHMWPE) Used in
Orthopedic Devices
e. 5 1O(k) Sterility Review Guidance K90-1 dated 02/12/l 990
f Draft Guidance Document for Femoral Stem Prostheses
g- Draft Guidance Document for Testing Acetabular Cup Prostheses
Consensus Standards:
page 3
Not for Implementation
14) F 1044-95, Standard Test Method for Shear Testing(of Porous Metal Coatings
15) F 110897a, Specification for Titanium-6 Aluminum-4 Vanadium Alloy Casting for
Surgical Implants (UNS R56406)
16) F 1147-99, Standard Test Method for Tension Testing of Calcium Phosphate and
Metallic Coatings
17) F 1160-98, Standard Test Method for Shear and Bending Fatigue Testing of Calcium
Phosphate and Metallic Medical Coatings
18) F 1377-98a, Standard Specification for Cobalt-28 Chromium-6 Molybdenum
Powder for Coating of Orthopedic Implants UNS R30075
19) F 1440-92 (97), Practice for Cyclic Fatigue Testing of Metallic Stemmed Hip
Arthroplasty Femoral Components Without Torsion
20) F 1472-99, Specification for Wrought Titanium - 6 Aluminum - 4 Vanadium Alloy
for Surgical Implant Applications (UNS R56400)
2 1) F 1537-94, Specification for Wrought Cobalt-28 Chromium-6 Molybdenum Alloy
for Surgical Implants
22) F 1580-95, Standard Specification for Titanium and Titanium-6% Aluminum-4%
Vanadium Alloy Powders for Coatings of Surgical Implants
23) F 1612-95, Practice for Cyclic Fatigue Testing of Metallic Stemmed Hip
Arthroplasty Femoral Components with Torsion
24) F 18 14-97a, Standard Guide for Evaluating Modular Hip and Knee Joint
Components
25) F 1820-97, Standard Test Method for Determining the Axial Disassembly Force of a
Modular Acetabular Device
26) F 1854-98, Test Method for Stereological Evaluation of Porous Coatings on Medical
Implants
27) F 1978-00, Test Method for Measuring Abrasion Resistance of Metallic Thermal
Spray Coatings by Using the TaberTMAbraser
3. Labeling
page4
Draft-Not for Implementation
b. Precautions:
(1) When using metallic cups intended for biological fixation or cemented use only,
surgeons should consider providing immediate resistance to tensile forces between the
metallic cup and the acetabular bone through the use of bone screws, spikes, screw
threads, fins, etc.
(2) To correctly position the metallic locking ring, surgeons should consult the
manufacturers instructions for appropriate device assembly.
page 5
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
ACTION: Notice.
FEDERAL REGISTER].
3
I
request to 301-443-8818.
John S. Goode,
Rockville, MD 20850,
(301) 594-2036
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
clearance.
confer any rights for or on any person and does not operate to
regulations.
and published the final rule, which set forth the agency's
5 /
the CDRH home page includes the civil money penhlty guidance
VI. Comments
DATED: