Gulik and Maandi

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

How is Gulika different from Maandi in Vedic astrology?

Are they same or different sub planets?


4 Answers

Deepak Kukreja, A passionate learner of Jyotish (astrology).


Written 23 Mar 2016
Well, the question you have asked has confused majority of the astrologers
and still no clear cut explanation is available as majority of classical texts
have different opinion about it.
Some classics state Gullika and Mandi as the same while some take both
of them as different non-luminous planets.
When i saw this question, i went through my library of classics on astrology
to search for an answer. I scanned the texts and will answer strictly to the
books that i have in my library.

BPHS (Brihat Parasara Hora Sastra)


This text has been treated as the Bible of Vedic/Hindu astrology. The
edition i own is by Sagar Publications, translation and commentary by GC
Sharma. According to it, in chapter number 3 and chapter number 26, sage
Parasara has referred to non luminous planets, how to calculate them and
their effects in various houses. He has mentioned only about Gullika and
no where he has mentioned Mandi. Only Gullika is mentioned and its
effects in various houses.

Phaldeepika
The edition i own of Phaldeepika is by Sagar Publications, translated by SS
Sareen. In chapter number 25 on Upagrahas (Sub-planets), Mantreswara
has referred Gullika and Mandi as the same thing. In sloka no 8, he says:
When Mandi or Gullika occupies the ascendants, the result will be as
follows....
In the subsequent slokas, he has referred only to Gullika and not Mandi by
which we can infer that both entities are same.
In sloka number 1 of same chapter, he has referred Mandi and not Gullika.
So according to Mantreswara, Mandi and Gullika are same.

Uttarkalamritam
Translation and commentary by V.S. Sastri
In chapter one, sloka 8, Kalidasa has referred Mandi and Gullika, both as
sons of Saturn as the major villians of a horoscope.

The other texts that i referred are


1. Hora Sara by Prithuyasas; Ranjan publications, translated by R.
Santhanam
2. Saravali by Kalyan Verma; Ranjan Publications translated by R.
Santhanam
3. Jataka Tatwa; Sagar Publications translated by SS Sareen
4. Brihat Jataka; Ranjan publications, translation and commentary by
Prof. PS Sastri

In above mentioned four texts, no reference to any non-luminous planets


has been made anywhere.

I hope this would clarify your doubt to some extent. I am no authority on


this matter and have just scanned the classical texts that i had with me and
wrote about it.

You might also like