INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: MARIGOLD D. TUSCANO Name of Rater: NIELITA C. CABEBE

Position: TEACHER I Position: HEAD TEACHER I
Bureau/Center/Service/DivD EPED-OCCIDENTAL MINDORO Date of Review: APRIL O8, 2019
Rating Period: S.Y. 2018-2019

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied JUNE 2018- 7.5% Quality No acceptable Showed
Education Knowledge knowledge of MARCH Showed Showed evidence was
Showed knowledge Showed knowledge knowledge of knowledge of knowledge of
Services and content within 2019 shown content and its
Pedagogy and across of content and its of content and its content and its content and its
integration within integration within integration within integration within integration within
curriculum and across subject
teaching areas. and across subject and across subject and across subject and across subject
areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in
MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a
rating of 5 3 3 3.000 0.225
of 7 of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 lessons Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable Submitted 2
lessons using MOV using MOV 1 and lessons using the given MOV evidence was lessons using MOV
1 and supported by supported by any 1 MOV 1 and shown 1 and supported by
any 1 of the other of the other given supported by any any 1 of the other
given MOV MOV 1 of the other given MOV
given MOV
Timeliness
Basic 2. Used a range JUNE 2018- 7.5% Quality Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using No acceptable Facilitated using
Education of teaching MARCH different teaching different teaching different teaching different teaching evidence was different teaching
Services strategies that 2019 strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that shown strategies that
enhance learner promote reading promote reading promote reading promote reading promote reading
schievement in writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or
literacy and numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as
numeracy skills shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4 with a rating of 5

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 learner- Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable Submitted 2 3 3 3.000 0.225
learner-centered centered lessons as learner-centered learner-centered evidence was learner-centered
lessons as evidently evidently shown in lessons as lessons as shown lessons as
shown in MOV 1 MOV 1 and evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in
and supported by supported by any 1 MOV 1 and any of the other MOV 1 and
any 1 of the other of the other MOV supported by any given MOV supported by any 1
MOV given given 1 of the other MOV of the other MOV
given given

Timeliness
 Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic 1. Content 3. Applied a JUNE 2018- 7.5% Quality Used different Used different Used different Used different No acceptable Used different
Education Knowledge range of MARCH teaching strategies teaching strategies
teaching strategies teaching strategies evidence was teaching strategies
Services and teaching 2019 that develop critical that develop critical
that develop that develop shown that develop critical
Pedagogy strategies to and creative and creative thinking
critical and critical and and creative
develop critical thinking skills skills and/or other
creative thinking creative thinking thinking skills
and creative and/or other HOTS HOTS as shown in skills and/or other skills and/or other and/or other HOTS
thinking, as well as shown in MOV 1 MOV 1 with a rating
HOTS as shown in HOTS as shown in as shown in MOV 1
as other higher with a rating of 7 of 6 MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a with a rating of 6
order thinking rating of 5 rating of 4 3 4 3.500 0.262
skills. Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 lessons Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable Submitted 3
lessons as as evidenced by lessons as lesson as evidence was lessons as
evidenced by MOV MOV 1 and evidenced by MOV evidenced by any shown evidenced by MOV
1 and supported by supported by any 1 1 and supported of the other given 1 and supported by
any 1 of the other of the other given by any 1 of the MOV any 1 of the other
given MOV MOV other given MOV given MOV
Timeliness
Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed JUNE 2018- 7.5% Quality No acceptable
Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom
Used classroom
Education Environment classroom MARCH evidence was Used classroom
Services and Diversity structure to 2019 management management management management shown management
of Learners engage learners, strategies that strategies that strategies that
strategies that strategies that
individually or in engage learners in engage learners in engage learners in
engage learners in engage learners in
groups, in activities/tasks as activities/tasks as activities/tasks as
activities/tasks as activities/tasks as
meanigful shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5
with a rating of 4 with a rating of 6 3 4 3.500 0.262
exploration,
discovery and Efficiency Submitted 1 No acceptable
Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 lessons Submitted 2 Submitted 3
hands-on lesson supported evidence was
lessons supported supported by MOV 1 lessons supported lessons supported
activities within a by any of the shown
by MOV 1 and any and any 1 of the by MOV 1 and any by MOV 1 and any
range of physical acceptable MOV
1 of the other other acceptable 1 of the other 1 of the other
learning acceptable MOV MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
environments. Timeliness
Basic 5. Managed 7.5% Quality Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher No acceptable Applied teacher
Education learner behavior management management management management evidence was management
Services constructively by strategies of learner strategies of learner strategies of strategies of shown strategies of
applying positive behavior that behavior that learner behavior learner behavior learner behavior
and non-violent promote positive promote positive that promote that promote that promote
discipline to and non-violent and non-violent positive and non- positive and non- positive and non-
ensure learning- discipline as shown discipline as shown violent discipline violent discipline violent discipline as
focused in MOV submitted in MOV submitted as shown in MOV as shown in MOV shown in MOV
environments. with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 submitted with a submitted with a submitted with a
rating of 5 rating of 4 rating of 6 4 4 4.000 0.300
 focused in MOV submitted in MOV submitted as shown in MOV as shown in MOV shown in MOV
environments. with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 submitted with a submitted with a submitted with a
rating of 5 rating of 4 rating of 6 4 4 4.000 0.300

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least Submitted any 1 of No acceptable Submitted at least
of the given of the given 4 of the given the given evidence was 4 of the given
strategies as strategies as strategies as strategies as shown strategies as
observed in at least observed in 3 observed in 2 observed in only 1 observed in 3
4 lessons lessons lessons lesson lessons
Timeliness
Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic 2. Learning 6. Used JUNE 2018- 7.5% Quality Applied Applied Applied No acceptable Applied
Applied
Education Environment differentiated, MARCH differentiated differentiated differentiated evidence was differentiated
differentiated
Services and Diversity developmentally 2019 teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies shown teaching strategies
of Learners appropriate to address learner teaching strategies to address learner to address learner to address learner
learning diversity as shown to address learner diversity as shown diversity as shown diversity as shown
experiences to in MOV 1 with a diversity as shown in in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a
address rating of 7 MOV 1 with a rating rating of 5 rating of 4 rating of 5
learners’ gender, of 6
needs, Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable Submitted 2
strengths, differentiated differentiated differentiated differentiated evidence was differentiated
interests and teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategy shown teaching strategies 3 4 3.500 0.262
experiences. in at least 2 in at least 2 lessons in 2 lessons as in only 1 lesson in 2 lessons as
lessons as as evidenced by evidenced by MOV as evidently evidenced by MOV
evidenced by MOV MOV 1 and 1 and supported shown in any 1 of 1 and supported by
1 and supported by supported by any 1 by any 1 of the the acceptable any 1 of the other
any 1 of the other of the other other acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV MOV

Timeliness
Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, JUNE 2018- 7.5% Quality Planned and Planned and Planned and Planned and No acceptable Planned and
Education and Planning managed and MARCH implemented implemented implemented implemented evidence was implemented
Services implemented 2019 developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally shown developmentally
developmentally sequenced sequenced teaching sequenced sequenced sequenced
sequenced teaching and and learning process teaching and teaching and teaching and
teaching and learning process as as shown in MOV 1 learning process learning process learning process as
learning shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 6 as shown in MOV as shown in MOV shown in MOV 1
processes to with a rating of 7 1 with a rating of 5 1 with a rating of 4 with a rating of 5
meet curriculum
requirements Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable Submitted 2
and varied developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally evidence was developmentally 3 4 3.500 0.262
teaching sequenced sequenced teaching sequenced sequenced shown sequenced
contexts. teaching and and learning process teaching and teaching and teaching and
learning process as as evidently shown learning process learning process learning process as
evidently shown in in MOV 1 and as evidently shown as evidently evidently shown in
MOV 1 and supported by any 1 in MOV 1 and shown in any 1 of MOV 1 and
supported by any 1 of the other given supported by any the given MOV supported by any 1
of the other given MOV 1 of the other of the other given
 MOV 1 and supported by any 1 in MOV 1 and shown in any 1 of MOV 1 and
supported by any 1 of the other given supported by any the given MOV supported by any 1
of the other given MOV 1 of the other of the other given
MOV given MOV MOV

Timeliness

Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic 3. Curriculum 8. Participated in JUNE 2018- 7.5% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely participated No acceptable Consistently
Education and Planning collegial MARCH participated in participated in participated in in LAC/FGD/ evidence was participated in
Services discussions that 2019 LACs/FGDs/meetin LACs/FGDs/meeting LACs/FGDs/ meeting to discuss shown LACs/FGDs/meetin
use teacher and gs to discuss s to discuss meetings to teacher/learner gs to discuss
learner feedback teacher/learner teacher/learner discuss feedback to enrich teacher/learner
to enrich feedback to enrich feedback to enrich teacher/learner instruction as feedback to enrich
teaching instruction as instruction as shownfeedback to enrich shown in the MOV instruction as
practice. shown in the MOV in the MOV instruction as submitted shown in the MOV
submitted submitted shown in the MOV submitted 5 5 5.000 0.375
submitted
Efficiency Participated in at Participated in 3 Participated in 2 Participated in 1 No acceptable Participated in at
least 4 LACs/FGDs/meeting LACs/FGDs/meeti LAC/FGD/meeting evidence was least 4
LACs/FGDs/meetin s as evidently shown ngs as evidently as evidently shown LACs/FGDs/meetin
gs as evidently in any 1 of the given shown in any 1 of shown in any 1 of gs as evidently
shown in any 1 of MOV the given MOV the given MOV shown in any 1 of
the given MOV the given MOV
Timeliness
Basic 9. Selected, JUNE 2018- 7.5% Quality Developed and Developed and used Developed and Developed and No acceptable Developed and
Education developed, MARCH used varied varied teaching and used varied used varied evidence was used varied
Services organized and 2019 teaching and learning resources, teaching and teaching and shown teaching and
used appropriate learning resources, including ICT, to learning learning learning resources,
teaching and including ICT, to address learning resources, resources, including ICT, to
learning address learning goals as shown in including ICT, to including ICT, to address learning
resources, goals as shown in MOV 1 with a rating address learning address learning goals as shown in
including ICT, to MOV 1 with a rating of 6 goals as shown in goals as shown in MOV 1 with a
address learning of 7 MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a rating of 5
goals. rating of 5 rating of 4
Efficiency Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted any No acceptable Submitted 2 varied
2 2 2.000 0.15
teaching and teaching and teaching and evidence was teaching and
Submitted at least 4 learning resources, learning learning resource, shown learning resources,
varied teaching and including ICT, as resources, including ICT, as including ICT, as
learning resources, evidently shown in including ICT, as evidently shown in evidently shown in
including ICT, as MOV 1 and evidently shown in any of the MOV 1 and
 Submitted at least 4 learning resources, learning learning resource, shown learning resources,
varied teaching and including ICT, as resources, including ICT, as including ICT, as
learning resources, evidently shown in including ICT, as evidently shown in evidently shown in
including ICT, as MOV 1 and evidently shown in any of the MOV 1 and
evidently shown in supported by any 1 MOV 1 and acceptable MOV supported by any 1
MOV 1 and of the acceptable supported by any of the acceptable
supported by any 1 MOV 1 of the acceptable MOV
of the acceptable MOV
MOV
Timeliness

Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic 4. 10. Designed, JUNE 2018- 7.5% Quality Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, Designed, No acceptable Designed,
Education Assessment selected, MARCH organized and used organized and used selected, selected, evidence was selected,
Services and organized and 2019 diagnostic, diagnostic, formative organized and organized and shown organized and
Reporting used diagnostic, formative and and summative used diagnostic, used diagnostic, used diagnostic,
formative and summative assessment formative and formative and formative and
summative assessment strategies consistent summative summative summative
assessment strategies with curriculum assessment assessment assessment
strategies consistent with requirements as strategies strategies strategies
consistent with curriculum shown in MOV 1 consistent with consistent with consistent with
curriculum requirements as with a rating of 6 curriculum curriculum curriculum
requirements. shown in MOV 1 requirements as requirements as requirements as
3 3 3 0.225
with a rating of 7 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4 with a rating of 5

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted 1 No acceptable Submitted 2 varied
varied assessment assessment tools as assessment tools assessment tool evidence was assessment tools
tools as evidently evidently shown in as evidently shown as evidently shown as evidently shown
shown in any 1 of any 1 of the in any 1 of the shown in any of in any 1 of the
the acceptable acceptable MOV acceptable MOV the acceptable acceptable MOV
MOV MOV
Timeliness
Basic 11. Monitored JUNE 2018- 7.5% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely monitored No acceptable Consistently
Education and evaluated MARCH monitored and monitored and monitored and and evaluated evidence was monitored and
Services learner progress 2019 evaluated learner evaluated learner evaluated learner learner progress shown evaluated learner
and progress and progress and progress and and achievement progress and
achievement achievement using achievement using achievement using using learner achievement using
using learner learner attainment learner attainment learner attainment attainment data as learner attainment
attainment data. data as shown in data as shown in the shown in the MOV data as shown in
 and progress and progress and and achievement progress and
achievement achievement using achievement using using learner achievement using
using learner learner attainment learner attainment learner attainment attainment data as learner attainment
attainment data. data as shown in data as shown in the data as shown in shown in the MOV data as shown in
the MOV submitted MOV submitted the MOV submitted the MOV submitted
submitted 3 3 3 3.000 0.225
Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted 1 No acceptable Submitted a
combination of at Submitted a combination of 2 of acceptable MOV evidence was combination of at
least 4 of the combination of 3 of the acceptable shown least 4 of the
acceptable MOV the acceptable MOV MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV No acceptable Submitted MOV
were distributed were distributed were distributed was completed in evidence was were distributed
across 4 quarters across 3 quarters across 2 quarters only 1 quarter shown across 4 quarters

Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic 4. 12.Communica JUNE 2018- 7.5% Quality Consistently Frequently showed Occasionally Rarely showed No acceptable Occasionally
Education Assessment ted promptly and MARCH showed prompt and prompt and clear showed prompt prompt and clear evidence was showed prompt
Services and clearly the 2019 clear communication of and clear communication of shown and clear
Reporting learners’ needs, communication of the learners’ needs, communication of the learners’ communication of
progress and the learners’ needs, progress and the learners’ needs, progress the learners’
achievement to progress and achievement to key needs, progress and achievement needs, progress
key achievement to key stakeholders, and achievement to key and achievement
stakeholders, stakeholders, including parents/ to key stakeholders, to key
including including parents/ guardians as shown stakeholders, including parents/ stakeholders,
parents/ guardians as shown in the MOV including parents/ guardians as including parents/
guardians. in the MOV submitted guardians as shown in the MOV guardians as 3 3 4 3.333 0.249
submitted shown in the MOV submitted shown in the MOV
submitted submitted
Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted any 1 of No acceptable Submitted a
combination of at combination of 3 of combination of 2 the given MOV evidence was combination of 2
least 4 of the the acceptable MOV of the acceptable shown of the acceptable
acceptable MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV No acceptable Submitted MOV
were distributed were distributed were distributed was completed in evidence was were distributed
across 4 quarters across 3 quarters across 2 quarters only 1 quarter shown across 2 quarters
Basic 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed JUNE 2018- 10% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely performed No acceptable Occasionally
Education various related MARCH performed various performed various performed various various related evidence was performed various
Services works/activities 2019 related related related work/activities that shown related
that contribute to work/activities that work/activities that work/activities that contribute to the work/activities that
Basic 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed JUNE 2018- 10% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely performed No acceptable Occasionally
Education various related MARCH performed various performed various performed various various related evidence was performed various
Services works/activities 2019 related related related work/activities that shown related
that contribute to work/activities that work/activities that work/activities that contribute to the work/activities that
the teaching- contribute to the contribute to the contribute to the teaching learning contribute to the
learning teaching learning teaching learning teaching learning process as shown teaching learning
process. process as shown process as shown in process as shown in the MOV process as shown
in the MOV the MOV submitted in the MOV submitted in the MOV 5 5 5 5.000 0.500
submitted submitted submitted

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 different Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable Submitted 2
different kinds of kinds of acceptable different kinds of the acceptable evidence was different kinds of
acceptable MOV MOV acceptable MOV MOV shown acceptable MOV
Timeliness
RATING FOR OVER-ALL
Very Satisfactory 3.522
ACCOMPLISHMENTS

ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCIES

RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory MARIGOLD D. TUSCANO NIELITA C. CABEBE RAFAEL G. MANALO, Ph.D
below 1.499 Poor Ratee Rater Approving Authority
 SUMMARY OF INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teachers I-III (Proficient Teachers)

Name of Employee: MARIGOLD D. TUSCANO Name of Rater: NIELITA C. CABEBE

Position: TEACHER I Position: HEAD TEACHER I
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DEPED-OCCIDENTAL MINDORO Date of Review: APRIL 08, 2019
Rating Period: S.Y. 2018-2019
Numerical Ratings
KRA Weight per KRA Objectives Weight per Objective Score
Q E T Ave
Objective 1 7.5% 3 3 3.000 0.225
KRA 1 22.5% Objective 2 7.5% 3 3 3.000 0.225
Objective 3 7.5% 3 4 3.500 0.262
Objective 4 7.5% 3 4 3.500 0.262
KRA 2 22.5% Objective 5 7.5% 4 4 4.000 0.300
Objective 6 7.5% 3 4 3.500 0.262
Objective 7 7.5% 3 4 3.500 0.262
KRA 3 22.5% Objective 8 7.5% 5 5 5.000 0.375
Objective 9 7.5% 2 2 2.000 0.150
Objective 10 7.5% 3 3 3.000 0.225
KRA 4 22.5% Objective 11 7.5% 3 3 3 3.000 0.225
Objective 12 7.5% 3 3 4 3.333 0.249
Plus Factor 10% Objective 13 10% 5 5 5.000 0.500
Final Rating Very Satisfactory
Adjectival Rating 3.522
Conforme: Rater:
MARIGOLD D. TUSCANO NIELITA C. CABEBE
Teacher 1 Head Teacher 1
 PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT TEAM
Validated by/Recommending Approval:
JUGELYN C. MATEO MARIYAH A. ADVINCULA CHRISTOPER A. CANTERAS
ICT Coordinator School Guidance Coordinator School Teacher's Association President

JOHN-JOHN E. ANGAN-ANGAN
School Property Custodian

NIELITA C. CABEBE
Head Teacher I

RAFAEL G. MANALO, Ph. D

Approving Authority
 INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Master Teacher I-IV

Name of Employee: MARIFE J. BANDALES Name of Rater: NIELITA C. CABEBE

Position: TEACHER I Position: HEAD TEACHER I
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DEPED-OCCIDENTTAL MINDORO Date of Review: 8-Apr-19
Rating Period:

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 1. Content 1. Modeled effective Quality No acceptable
Services Knowledge and applications of content Modeled effective Modeled effective Modeled effective Modeled effective evidence was Modeled effective
Pedagogy knowledge within and applications of applications of applications of applications of shown applications of
across curriculum content knowledge content knowledge content knowledge content knowledge content knowledge
teaching areas. within and across within and across within and across within and across within and across
curriculum teaching curriculum teaching curriculum teaching curriculum teaching curriculum teaching
areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in
MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating
of 8 of 7 of 6 of 5 of 7
7.5%
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable Submitted 3 lessons
lessons as lessons as lessons as as evidenced by evidence was as evidenced by
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV MOV 1 from shown MOV 1 from
1 and supported by 1 from colleagues 1 from colleagues colleagues and colleagues and
any 1 of the other and supported by and supported by supported by any 1 supported by any 1
MOV given any 1 of the other any 1 of the other of the other MOV of the other MOV
MOV given MOV given given given
Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Collaborated with Quality Conducted, Conducted and Conducted action Proposed action No acceptable No acceptable
Services colleagues in the completed and completed action research with research with evidence was evidence was
conduct and application disseminated action research with colleagues colleagues shown shown
of research to enrich research with colleagues
knowledge of content colleagues
and pedagogy.
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted any 3 of Submitted any 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable No acceptable
7.5%
of the given MOV the acceptable MOV MOV evidence was evidence was
MOV shown shown
Timeliness Presented the Completed the Conducted the Proposed the No acceptable No acceptable
research report research report research report research report evidence was evidence was
within the rating within the rating within the rating within the rating shown shown
period period period period
 Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 1. Content 3. Developed and Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated No acceptable
Services Knowledge and applied effective effective teaching effective teaching effective teaching effective teaching evidence was
Pedagogy teaching strategies to strategies to strategies to strategies to strategies to shown
promote critical and promote critical and promote critical and promote critical and promote critical and
creative thinking, as well creative thinking, as creative thinking, as creative thinking, as creative thinking, as
as other higher-order well as other well as other well as other well as other
thinking skills. higher-order higher-order higher-order higher-order
thinking skills as thinking skills as thinking skills as thinking skills as
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
7.5% with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5

Efficiency Submitted 4 or Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable

more lessons as lessons as lessons as as evidently shown evidence was
evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in in MOV 1 and shown
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and supported by any of
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1 the other MOV
of the other MOV of the other MOV of the other MOV given
given given given
Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Learning 4. Worked with Quality No acceptable
Services Environment and colleagues to model and Modeled and Modeled and Modeled and
Modeled and evidence was
Diversity of share effective shared effective shared effective shared effective
shared effective shown
Learners techniques in the classroom classroom classroom classroom
management of management management managementmanagement
classroom structure to strategies that strategies that strategies that
strategies that
engage learners, engage learners in engage learners in engage learners in
engage learners in
individually or in groups, activities/ tasks activities/ tasks activities/ tasks
activities/ tasks
in meaningful done in different done in different done in different
done in different
exploration, discovery physical learning physical learning physical learning
physical learning
7.5%
and hands-on activities environments as environments as environments as
environments as
within a range of shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
shown in MOV 1
physical learning with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6
with a rating of 5
environments. Efficiency Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2
supported by any of evidence was
lessons supported lessons supported lessons supported
the acceptable shown
by MOV 1 and any by MOV 1 and any by MOV 1 and any
MOV
1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
 by MOV 1 and any by MOV 1 and any by MOV 1 and any
MOV
1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness

Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 2. Learning 5. Exhibited effective Quality Exhibited effective Exhibited effective Exhibited effective Exhibited effective No acceptable
Services Environment and and constructive and constructive and constructive and constructive and constructive evidence was
Diversity of behavior management behavior behavior behavior behavior shown
Learners skills by applying management skills management skills management skills management skills
positive and non-violent by applying positive by applying positive by applying positive by applying positive
discipline to ensure and non-violent and non-violent and non-violent and non-violent
learning-focused discipline to ensure discipline to ensure discipline to ensure discipline to ensure
environments. learning-focused learning-focused learning-focused learning-focused
environments environments environments environments
7.5% shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5

Efficiency Applied at least 7 of Applied at least 7 of Applied at least 7 of Applied any of the No acceptable
the given strategies the given strategies the given strategies given strategies as evidence was
as observed in at as observed in 3 as observed in 2 observed in only 1 shown
least 4 lessons lessons lessons lesson
Timeliness
Basic Education 6. Worked with Quality Worked with Worked with Worked with Worked with No acceptable
Services colleagues to share colleagues at least colleagues in the colleagues but no colleagues but no evidence was
differentiated, in the department or evidence of sharing evidence of sharing shown
developmentally district/cluster level grade level to share with others with others
appropriate to share lesson lesson
opportunities to address
Efficiency Submitted at least 1 Submitted at least 1 Submitted at least 1 Submitted at least 1 No acceptable
learners’ differences in 7.5%
lesson as evidently lesson as evidently lesson as evidently lesson, as evidence was
gender, needs,
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 evidenced by either shown
strengths, interests and
and supported by and supported by and supported by MOV 2 or 3 but no
experiences.
any acceptable any acceptable any acceptable evidence of sharing
MOV MOV MOV with others
 Timeliness
Basic Education 3. Curriculum and 7. Developed and Quality Developed and Developed and Developed and Developed and No acceptable
Services Planning applied effective applied effective applied effective applied effective applied effective evidence was
strategies in the strategies showing strategies showing strategies showing strategies showing shown
planning and developmentally- developmentally- developmentally- developmentally-
management of sequenced sequenced sequenced sequenced
developmentally teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and
sequenced teaching learning process as learning process as learning process as learning process as
and learning processes shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
to meet curriculum with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5
requirements and varied 7.5%
teaching contexts. Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 2-3 Submitted 1 lesson Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
lessons as lessons as as evidenced by as evidenced by evidence was
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV shown in MOV 1 any 1 of the shown
1 and 2 and 1 and 2 and and/or 2 and acceptable MOV
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1
of the other of the other of the other
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness

Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 3. Curriculum and 8. Reviewed with Quality Consistently Frequently led Occasionally led Rarely led No acceptable
Services Planning colleagues, teacher and participated in collaborative collaborative collaborative evidence was
learner feedback to LACs/FGDs/meetin reviews of teacher reviews of teacher reviews of teacher shown
plan, facilitate and gs to discuss and learner and learner and learner
enrich teaching practice. teacher/learner feedback as feedback as feedback as
feedback to enrich evidenced by the evidenced by the evidenced by the
instruction as MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
shown in the MOV
submitted

7.5% Efficiency Submitted 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable

collaborative collaborative collaborative collaborative review evidence was
reviews of teacher reviews of teacher reviews of teacher of teacher and shown
and learner and learner and learner learner feedback as
feedback as feedback as feedback as evidently shown in
evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in any of the
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and acceptable MOV
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1
of the acceptable of the acceptable of the acceptable
MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness
Basic Education 9. Advised and guided Quality Consistently Frequently advised Occasionally Rarely advised No acceptable
Services colleagues in the advised colleagues colleagues in the advised colleagues colleagues in the evidence was
selection, organization, in the selection, selection, in the selection, selection, shown
development and use of organization, organization, organization, organization,
Basic Education 9. Advised and guided Quality Consistently Frequently advised Occasionally Rarely advised No acceptable
Services colleagues in the advised colleagues colleagues in the advised colleagues colleagues in the evidence was
selection, organization, in the selection, selection, in the selection, selection, shown
development and use of organization, organization, organization, organization,
appropriate teaching development and development and development and development and
and learning resources, appropriate use of appropriate use of appropriate use of appropriate use of
including ICT, to teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and
address specific learning resources learning resources learning resources learning resources
learning goals. as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the
7.5% MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable

teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and evidence was
learning resources learning resources learning resources learning resource shown
as evidenced by at as evidenced by at as evidenced by at as evidenced by
least 1 of the least 1 of the least 1 of the any of the
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 4. Assessment 10. Worked Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely reviewed No acceptable
Services and Reporting collaboratively with reviewed reviewed reviewed collaboratively evidence was
colleagues to review the collaboratively collaboratively collaboratively assessment tools shown
design, selection, assessment tools assessment tools assessment tools with colleagues as
organization and use of with colleagues as with colleagues as with colleagues as shown in the MOV
a range of effective shown in the MOV shown in the MOV shown in the MOV submitted
diagnostic, formative 7.5% submitted submitted submitted
and summative
assessment strategies Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable
consistent with assessment tools assessment tools assessment tools assessment tool as evidence was
curriculum as evidently shown as evidently shown as evidently shown evidently shown in shown
requirements. in any of the in any of the in any of the any of the
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness
Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 4. Assessment 11. Interpreted Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely collaborated No acceptable
Services and Reporting collaboratively collaborated with collaborated with collaborated with with colleagues in evidence was
monitoring and colleagues in the colleagues in the colleagues in the the interpretation of shown
evaluation strategies of interpretation of interpretation of interpretation of assessment data
attainment data to assessment data assessment data assessment data as shown in the
support learner as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the MOV submitted
7.5%
progress and MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
achievement.
Efficiency Submitted at least 2 Submitted at least 3 Submitted at least 2 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable
different types of of the same kind of of the same kind of the MOV evidence was
MOV MOV MOV shown
Timeliness
Basic Education 12. Applied skills in the Quality Consistently Frequently applied Occasionally Rarely applied skills No acceptable
Services effective communication applied skills in the skills in the applied skills in the in the effective evidence was
of learner needs, effective effective effective communication of shown
progress and communication of communication of communication of learner needs and
achievement to key learner needs and learner needs and learner needs and progress to
Services effective communication applied skills in the skills in the applied skills in the in the effective evidence was
of learner needs, effective effective effective communication of shown
progress and communication of communication of communication of learner needs and
achievement to key learner needs and learner needs and learner needs and progress to
stakeholders, including progress to progress to progress to parents/ guardians
parents/guardians. parents/ guardians parents/ guardians parents/ guardians as shown in the
7.5% as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the MOV submitted
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted any 3 Submitted any 2 Submitted any 1

of the acceptable MOV MOV MOV
MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed various Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely performed No acceptable
Services related works/activities performed special performed special performed special special tasks and/or evidence was
that contribute to the tasks and/or tasks and/or tasks and/or assignments as shown
teaching-learning assignments as assignments as assignments as shown in the MOV
process. shown in the MOV shown in the MOV shown in the MOV submitted
10% submitted submitted submitted
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted only 3 Submitted only 2 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable
different kinds of different kinds of different kinds of the acceptable evidence was
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV MOV shown
Timeliness
RATING FOR OVER-ALL
0.000
ACCOMPLISHMENTS

ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCIES

RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory MARIFE J. BANDALES NIELITA C. CABEBE NAME OF THE APPROVING AUTHORITY
below 1.499 Poor Ratee Rater Approving Authority
 INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (IP
Master Teacher I-IV (Highly Proficient Teache

Name of Employee:
Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:
Rating Period:

Weight per Weight per Numeric

KRA Objectives
KRA Objective Q
Objective 1 7.5% 0
KRA 1 22.5% Objective 2 7.5% 0
Objective 3 7.5% 0
Objective 4 7.5% 0
KRA 2 22.5% Objective 5 7.5% 0
Objective 6 7.5% 0
Objective 7 7.5% 0
KRA 3 22.5% Objective 8 7.5% 0
Objective 9 7.5% 0
Objective 10 7.5% 0
KRA 4 22.5% Objective 11 7.5% 0
Objective 12 7.5% 0
Plus Factor 10% Objective 13 10% 0

NAME OF THE RATEE NAME OF RATER

Ratee Rater
REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) SUMMARY SHEET
y Proficient Teacher)

Name of Rater:
Position:
Date of Review:

Numerical Ratings
Score
E T Ave
0 0.000 0.000
0 0 0.000 0.000
0 0.000 0.000
0 0.000 0.000
0 0.000 0.000
0 0.000 0.000
0 0.000 0.000
0 0.000 0.000
0 0.000 0.000
0 0.000 0.000
0 0.000 0.000
0 0.000 0.000
0 0.000 0.000
Final Rating 0
Adjectival Rating 0

NAME OF RATER NAME OF APPROVING AUTHORITY

Rater Approving Authority