INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: Name of Rater: JANET J. DELIGERO

Position: Position: Head Teacher III
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Ernesto Rondon High School, District 1, Quezon City Date of Review: April 5, 2019
Rating Period: April, 2018-March, 2019

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E
Basic Education 1. Content 1. Applied knowledge June, 2018- Quality Showed knowledge of Showed knowledge of Showed knowledge Showed knowledge No acceptable
Services Knowledge and of content within and March, 2019 content and its content and its of content and its of content and its evidence was
Pedagogy across curriculum integration within and integration within and integration within and integration within and shown
(22.5%) teaching areas. across subject areas as across subject areas across subject areas across subject areas
shown in MOV 1 with a as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1
rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4

5.0%
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 lessons Submitted 2 lessons Submitted any 1 of No acceptable
lessons using MOV 1 using MOV 1 and using MOV 1 and the given MOV evidence was
and supported by any 1 supported by any 1 of supported by any 1 shown
of the other given MOV the other given MOV of the other given
MOV

Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Used a range of June, 2018- Quality Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using No acceptable
Services teaching strategies that March, 2019 different teaching different teaching different teaching different teaching evidence was
enhance learner strategies that promote strategies that strategies that strategies that shown
schievement in literacy reading writing and/or promote reading promote reading promote reading
and numeracy skills numeracy skills as writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or
shown in MOV 1 with a numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as
rating of 7 shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with
rating of 6 a rating of 5 a rating of 4

7.5% Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 learner- Submitted 2 learner- Submitted 1 learner- No acceptable
learner-centered lessons centered lessons as centered lessons as centered lessons as evidence was
as evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in shown
MOV 1 and supported MOV 1 and supported MOV 1 and any of the other given
by any 1 of the other by any 1 of the other supported by any 1 MOV
MOV given MOV given of the other MOV
 MOV 1 and supported MOV 1 and supported MOV 1 and any of the other given
by any 1 of the other by any 1 of the other supported by any 1 MOV
MOV given MOV given of the other MOV
given

Timeliness
 Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E
Basic Education 3. Applied a range of June, 2018- Quality Used different teaching Used different Used different Used different No acceptable
Services teaching strategies to March, 2019 strategies that develop teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies evidence was
develop critical and critical and creative that develop critical that develop critical that develop critical shown
creative thinking, as thinking skills and/or and creative thinking and creative thinking and creative thinking
well as other higher other HOTS as shown in skills and/or other skills and/or other skills and/or other
order thinking skills. MOV 1 with a rating of 7 HOTS as shown in HOTS as shown in HOTS as shown in
MOV 1 with a rating of MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating
6 of 5 of 4
7.5%
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 lessons Submitted 2 lessons Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
lessons as evidenced by as evidenced by MOV as evidenced by as evidenced by any evidence was
MOV 1 and supported 1 and supported by MOV 1 and of the other given shown
by any 1 of the other any 1 of the other supported by any 1 MOV
given MOV given MOV of the other given
MOV

Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Learning 4. Managed classroom June, 2018- Quality Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom No acceptable
Services Environment structure to engage March, 2019 management strategies management management management evidence was
and Diversity learners, individually or that engage learners in strategies that engage strategies that strategies that shown
of Learners in groups, in meanigful activities/tasks as shown learners in engage learners in engage learners in
( 22.5% ) exploration, discovery in MOV 1 with a rating of activities/tasks as activities/tasks as activities/tasks as
and hands-on activities 7 shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with
within a range of rating of 6 a rating of 5 a rating of 4
physical learning
7.5%
environments.
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 lessons Submitted 2 lessons Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
lessons supported by supported by MOV 1 supported by MOV 1 supported by any of evidence was
MOV 1 and any 1 of the and any 1 of the other and any 1 of the the acceptable MOV shown
other acceptable MOV acceptable MOV other acceptable
MOV

Timeliness
Basic Education 5. Managed learner June, 2018- Quality Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher No acceptable
Services behavior constructively March, 2019 management strategies management management management evidence was
by applying positive of learner behavior that strategies of learner strategies of learner strategies of learner shown
and non-violent promote positive and behavior that promote behavior that behavior that promote
discipline to ensure non-violent discipline as positive and non- promote positive positive and non-
learning-focused shown in MOV violent discipline as and non-violent violent discipline as
environment submitted with a rating shown in MOV discipline as shown shown in MOV
of 7 submitted with a rating in MOV submitted submitted with a
of 6 with a rating of 5 rating of 4
7.5%
7.5%

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 of Submitted at least 4 of Submitted at least 4 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable
the given strategies as the given strategies as of the given the given strategies evidence was
observed in at least 4 observed in 3 lessons strategies as as observed in only 1 shown
lessons observed in 2 lesson
lessons

Timeliness
 Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E
Basic Education 6. Used differentiated, June, 2018- Quality Applied differentiated Applied differentiated Applied differentiated Applied differentiated No acceptable
Services developmentally March, 2019 teaching strategies to teaching strategies to teaching strategies teaching strategies to evidence was
appropriate learning address learner diversity address learner to address learner address learner shown
experiences to address as shown in MOV 1 with diversity as shown in diversity as shown in diversity as shown in
learners’ gender, a rating of 7 MOV 1 with a rating of MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating
needs, strengths, 6 of 5 of 4
interests and
experiences.

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable

differentiated teaching differentiated teaching differentiated differentiated evidence was
7.5% strategies in at least 2 strategies in at least 2 teaching strategies in teaching strategy in shown
lessons as evidenced by lessons as evidenced 2 lessons as only 1 lesson as
MOV 1 and supported by MOV 1 and evidenced by MOV 1 evidently shown in
by any 1 of the other supported by any 1 of and supported by any 1 of the
acceptable MOV the other acceptable any 1 of the other acceptable MOV
MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness
Basic Education 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, managed June, 2018- Quality Planned and Planned and Planned and Planned and No acceptable
Services and Planning and implemented March, 2019 implemented implemented implemented implemented evidence was
( 22.5% ) developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally shown
sequenced teaching sequenced teaching and sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching
and learning processes learning process as and learning process and learning process and learning process
to meet curriculum shown in MOV 1 with a as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1
requirements and rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
varied teaching
contexts.
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable
developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally evidence was
7.5% sequenced teaching and sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching shown
learning process as and learning process and learning process and learning process
evidently shown in MOV as evidently shown in as evidently shown as evidently shown in
1 and supported by any MOV 1 and supported in MOV 1 and any 1 of the given
1 of the other given by any 1 of the other supported by any 1 MOV
MOV given MOV of the other given
MOV
Timeliness
 Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E
Basic Education 8. Participated in June, 2018- Quality Consistently participated Frequently participated Occasionally Rarely participated in No acceptable
Services collegial discussions March, 2019 in LACs/FGDs/meetings in participated in LAC/FGD/ meeting to evidence was
that use teacher and to discuss LACs/FGDs/meetings LACs/FGDs/ discuss shown
learner feedback to teacher/learner to discuss meetings to discuss teacher/learner
enrich teaching feedback to enrich teacher/learner teacher/learner feedback to enrich
practice. instruction as shown in feedback to enrich feedback to enrich instruction as shown
the MOV submitted instruction as shown in instruction as shown in the MOV submitted
the MOV submitted in the MOV
submitted
7.5%
Efficiency Participated in at least 4 Participated in 3 Participated in 2 Participated in 1 No acceptable
LACs/FGDs/meetings as LACs/FGDs/meetings LACs/FGDs/meeting LAC/FGD/meeting as evidence was
evidently shown in any 1 as evidently shown in s as evidently shown evidently shown in shown
of the given MOV any 1 of the given in any 1 of the given any 1 of the given
MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness
Basic Education 9. Selected, June, 2018- Quality Developed and used Developed and used Developed and used Developed and used No acceptable
Services developed, organized March, 2019 varied teaching and varied teaching and varied teaching and varied teaching and evidence was
and used appropriate learning resources, learning resources, learning resources, learning resources, shown
teaching and learning including ICT, to address including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to
resources, including learning goals as shown address learning goals address learning address learning
ICT, to address in MOV 1 with a rating of as shown in MOV 1 goals as shown in goals as shown in
learning goals. 7 with a rating of 6 MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating
of 5 of 4

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted any No acceptable
7.5% varied teaching and teaching and learning teaching and teaching and learning evidence was
learning resources, resources, including learning resources, resource, including shown
including ICT, as ICT, as evidently including ICT, as ICT, as evidently
evidently shown in MOV shown in MOV 1 and evidently shown in shown in any of the
1 and supported by any supported by any 1 of MOV 1 and acceptable MOV
1 of the acceptable MOV the acceptable MOV supported by any 1
of the acceptable
MOV

Timeliness
 Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E
Basic Education 4. Assessment 10. Designed, June, 2018- Quality Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, selected, No acceptable
Services and Reporting selected, organized March, 2019 organized and used organized and used organized and used organized and used evidence was
(22.5%) and used diagnostic, diagnostic, formative diagnostic, formative diagnostic, formative diagnostic, formative shown
formative and and summative and summative and summative and summative
summative assessment strategies assessment strategies assessment assessment
assessment strategies consistent with consistent with strategies consistent strategies consistent
consistent with curriculum requirements curriculum with curriculum with curriculum
curriculum as shown in MOV 1 with requirements as requirements as requirements as
requirements. a rating of 7 shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with
rating of 6 a rating of 5 a rating of 4

7.5%

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted 1 No acceptable

varied assessment tools assessment tools as assessment tools as assessment tool as evidence was
as evidently shown in evidently shown in any evidently shown in evidently shown in shown
any 1 of the acceptable 1 of the acceptable any 1 of the any of the acceptable
MOV MOV acceptable MOV MOV

Timeliness
Basic Education 11. Monitored and June, 2018- Quality Consistently monitored Frequently monitored Occasionally Rarely monitored and No acceptable
Services evaluated learner March, 2019 and evaluated learner and evaluated learner monitored and evaluated learner evidence was
progress and progress and progress and evaluated learner progress and shown
achievement using achievement using achievement using progress and achievement using
learner attainment learner attainment data learner attainment achievement using learner attainment
data. as shown in the MOV data as shown in the learner attainment data as shown in the
submitted MOV submitted data as shown in the MOV submitted
MOV submitted

7.5% Efficiency Submitted a combination Submitted a Submitted a Submitted 1 No acceptable

of at least 4 of the combination of 3 of the combination of 2 of acceptable MOV evidence was
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV the acceptable MOV shown

Timeliness Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV was No acceptable
distributed across 4 distributed across 3 distributed across 2 completed in only 1 evidence was
quarters quarters quarters quarter shown
 Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E
Basic Education 12.Communica ted June, 2018- Quality Consistently showed Frequently showed Occasionally showed Rarely showed No acceptable
Services promptly and clearly March, 2019 prompt and clear prompt and clear prompt and clear prompt and clear evidence was
the learners’ needs, communication of the communication of the communication of communication of the shown
progress and learners’ needs, learners’ needs, the learners’ needs, learners’ needs,
achievement to key progress and progress and progress and progress and
stakeholders, including achievement to key achievement to key achievement to key achievement to key
parents/ guardians. stakeholders, including stakeholders, including stakeholders, stakeholders,
parents/ guardians as parents/ guardians as including parents/ including parents/
shown in the MOV shown in the MOV guardians as shown guardians as shown
submitted submitted in the MOV in the MOV submitted
submitted
7.5%

Efficiency Submitted a combination Submitted a Submitted a Submitted any 1 of No acceptable

of at least 4 of the combination of 3 of the combination of 2 of the given MOV evidence was
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV the acceptable MOV shown

Timeliness Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV was No acceptable
distributed across 4 distributed across 3 distributed across 2 completed in only 1 evidence was
quarters quarters quarters quarter shown

Basic Education 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed various April, 2018- Quality Consistently performed Frequently performed Occasionally Rarely performed No acceptable
Services (10%) related works/activities March, 2019 various related various related performed various various related evidence was
that contribute to the work/activities that work/activities that related work/activities that shown
teaching-learning contribute to the contribute to the work/activities that contribute to the
process. teaching learning teaching learning contribute to the teaching learning
process as shown in the process as shown in teaching learning process as shown in
MOV submitted the MOV submitted process as shown in the MOV submitted
10% the MOV submitted

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 different Submitted 2 different Submitted any 1 of No acceptable
different kinds of kinds of acceptable kinds of acceptable the acceptable MOV evidence was
acceptable MOV MOV MOV shown

Timeliness
RATING FOR OVER-ALL
ACCOMPLISHMENTS

ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCIES

RANGE: ADJECTIVAL RATING:
4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory _________________________________ _________________________________ LAUNCELOT T. LAUIGAN, Ed.D.
below 1.499 Poor Ratee Rater Approving Authority
NT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III
e of Rater: JANET J. DELIGERO
on: Head Teacher III
of Review: April 5, 2019

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Rating
Ave Score
T
Rating
Ave Score
T
Rating
Ave Score
T
Rating
Ave Score
T
Rating
Ave Score
T
Rating
Ave Score
T
LAUNCELOT T. LAUIGAN, Ed.D.
Approving Authority
 INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) SUMMARY SHEET
Teacher I-III (Proficient Teacher)

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:

Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review:
Rating Period:

Weight per Weight per Numerical Ratings

KRA Objectives Score
KRA Objective Q E T Ave
Objective 1 7.5%
KRA 1 22.5% Objective 2 7.5%
Objective 3 7.5%
Objective 4 7.5%
KRA 2 22.5% Objective 5 7.5%
Objective 6 7.5%
Objective 7 7.5%
KRA 3 22.5% Objective 8 7.5%
Objective 9 7.5%
Objective 10 7.5%
KRA 4 22.5% Objective 11 7.5%
Objective 12 7.5%
Plus Factor 10% Objective 13 10%
Final Rating
Adjectival Rating

NAME OF THE RATEE NAME OF RATER NAME OF APPROVING AUTHORITY

Ratee Rater Approving Authority
 INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Master Teacher I-IV

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:

Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review:
Rating Period:

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 1. Content 1. Modeled effective Quality No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Services Knowledge and applications of content Modeled effective Modeled effective Modeled effective Modeled effective evidence was
Pedagogy knowledge within and applications of applications of applications of applications of shown
across curriculum content knowledge content knowledge content knowledge content knowledge
teaching areas. within and across within and across within and across within and across
curriculum teaching curriculum teaching curriculum teaching curriculum teaching
areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in
MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating
of 8 of 7 of 6 of 5
7.5%
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
lessons as lessons as lessons as as evidenced by evidence was
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV MOV 1 from shown
1 and supported by 1 from colleagues 1 from colleagues colleagues and
any 1 of the other and supported by and supported by supported by any 1
MOV given any 1 of the other any 1 of the other of the other MOV
MOV given MOV given given
Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Collaborated with Quality Conducted, Conducted and Conducted action Proposedaction No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Services colleagues in the completed and completed action research with research with evidence was
conduct and application disseminated action research with colleagues colleagues shown
of research to enrich research with colleagues
knowledge of content colleagues
and pedagogy.
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted any 3 of Submitted any 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable
7.5%
of the given MOV the acceptable MOV MOV evidence was
MOV shown
Timeliness Presented the Completed the Conducted the Proposed the No acceptable
research report research report research report research report evidence was
within the rating within the rating within the rating within the rating shown
period period period period
Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 1. Content 3. Developed and Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Services Knowledge and applied effective effective teaching effective teaching effective teaching effective teaching evidence was
Pedagogy teaching strategies to strategies to strategies to strategies to strategies to shown
promote critical and promote critical and promote critical and promote critical and promote critical and
creative thinking, as well creative thinking, as creative thinking, as creative thinking, as creative thinking, as
as other higher-order well as other well as other well as other well as other
thinking skills. higher-order higher-order higher-order higher-order
thinking skills as thinking skills as thinking skills as thinking skills as
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
7.5% with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5

Efficiency Submitted 4 or Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable

more lessons as lessons as lessons as as evidently shown evidence was
evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in in MOV 1 and shown
 7.5%
Efficiency Submitted 4 or Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
more lessons as lessons as lessons as as evidently shown evidence was
evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in in MOV 1 and shown
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and supported by any of
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1 the other MOV
of the other MOV of the other MOV of the other MOV given
given given given
Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Learning 4. Worked with Quality No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Services Environment and colleagues to model and Modeled and Modeled and Modeled and
Modeled and evidence was
Diversity of share effective shared effective shared effective shared effective
shared effective shown
Learners techniques in the classroom classroom classroom
classroom
management of management management management
management
classroom structure to strategies that strategies that strategies that
strategies that
engage learners, engage learners in engage learners in engage learners in
engage learners in
individually or in groups, activities/ tasks activities/ tasks activities/ tasks
activities/ tasks
in meaningful done in different done in different done in different
done in different
exploration, discovery physical learning physical learning physical learning
physical learning
7.5%
and hands-on activities environments as environments as environments as
environments as
within a range of shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
shown in MOV 1
physical learning with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6
with a rating of 5
environments.environm Efficiency Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
ents. Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2
supported by any of evidence was
lessons supported lessons supported lessons supported
the acceptable shown
by MOV 1 and any by MOV 1 and any by MOV 1 and any
MOV
1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness
Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 2. Learning 5. Exhibited effective Quality Exhibited effective Exhibited effective Exhibited effective Exhibited effective No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Services Environment and and constructive and constructive and constructive and constructive and constructive evidence was
Diversity of behavior management behavior behavior behavior behavior shown
Learners skills by applying management skills management skills management skills management skills
positive and non-violent by applying positive by applying positive by applying positive by applying positive
discipline to ensure and non-violent and non-violent and non-violent and non-violent
learning-focused discipline to ensure discipline to ensure discipline to ensure discipline to ensure
environments. learning-focused learning-focused learning-focused learning-focused
environments environments environments environments
7.5% shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5

Efficiency Applied at least 7 of Applied at least 7 of Applied at least 7 of Applied any of the No acceptable
the given strategies the given strategies the given strategies given strategies as evidence was
as observed in at as observed in 3 as observed in 2 observed in only 1 shown
least 4 lessons lessons lessons lesson
Timeliness
Basic Education 6. Worked with Quality Worked with Worked with Worked with Worked with No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Services colleagues to share colleagues at least colleagues in the colleagues but no colleagues but no evidence was
differentiated, in the department or evidence of sharing evidence of sharing shown
developmentally district/cluster level grade level to share with others with others
appropriate to share lesson lesson
opportunities to address
Efficiency Submitted at least 1 Submitted at least 1 Submitted at least 1 Submitted at least 1 No acceptable
learners’ differences in 7.5%
lesson as evidently lesson as evidently lesson as evidently lesson, as evidence was
gender, needs,
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 evidenced by either shown
strengths, interests and
and supported by and supported by and supported by MOV 2 or 3 but no
experiences.
any acceptable any acceptable any acceptable evidence of sharing
MOV MOV MOV with others
Timeliness
Basic Education 3. Curriculum and 7. Developed and Quality Developed and Developed and Developed and Developed and No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Services Planning applied effective applied effective applied effective applied effective applied effective evidence was
strategies in the strategies showing strategies showing strategies showing strategies showing shown
Basic Education 3. Curriculum and 7. Developed and Quality Developed and Developed and Developed and Developed and No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Services Planning applied effective applied effective applied effective applied effective applied effective evidence was
strategies in the strategies showing strategies showing strategies showing strategies showing shown
planning and developmentally- developmentally- developmentally- developmentally-
management of sequenced sequenced sequenced sequenced
developmentally teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and
sequenced teaching learning process as learning process as learning process as learning process as
and learning processes shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
to meet curriculum with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5
requirements and varied 7.5%
teaching contexts. Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 2-3 Submitted 1 lesson Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
lessons as lessons as as evidenced by as evidenced by evidence was
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV shown in MOV 1 any 1 of the shown
1 and 2 and 1 and 2 and and/or 2 and acceptable MOV
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1
of the other of the other of the other
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness
Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 3. Curriculum and 8. Reviewed with Quality Consistently Frequently led Occasionally led Rarely led No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Services Planning colleagues, teacher and participated in collaborative collaborative collaborative evidence was
learner feedback to LACs/FGDs/meetin reviews of teacher reviews of teacher reviews of teacher shown
plan, facilitate and gs to discuss and learner and learner and learner
enrich teaching practice. teacher/learner feedback as feedback as feedback as
feedback to enrich evidenced by the evidenced by the evidenced by the
instruction as MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
shown in the MOV
submitted

7.5% Efficiency Submitted 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable

collaborative collaborative collaborative collaborative review evidence was
reviews of teacher reviews of teacher reviews of teacher of teacher and shown
and learner and learner and learner learner feedback as
feedback as feedback as feedback as evidently shown in
evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in any of the
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and acceptable MOV
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1
of the acceptable of the acceptable of the acceptable
MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness
Basic Education 9. Advised and guided Quality Consistently Frequently advised Occasionally Rarely advised No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Services colleagues in the advised colleagues colleagues in the advised colleagues colleagues in the evidence was
selection, organization, in the selection, selection, in the selection, selection, shown
development and use of organization, organization, organization, organization,
appropriate teaching development and development and development and development and
and learning resources, appropriate use of appropriate use of appropriate use of appropriate use of
including ICT, to teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and
address specific learning resources learning resources learning resources learning resources
learning goals. as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the
7.5% MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable

teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and evidence was
learning resources learning resources learning resources learning resource shown
as evidenced by at as evidenced by at as evidenced by at as evidenced by
least 1 of the least 1 of the least 1 of the any of the
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 4. Assessment 10. Worked Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely reviewed No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Services and Reporting collaboratively with reviewed reviewed reviewed collaboratively evidence was
colleagues to review the collaboratively collaboratively collaboratively assessment tools shown
design, selection, assessment tools assessment tools assessment tools with colleagues as
organization and use of with colleagues as with colleagues as with colleagues as shown in the MOV
Services and Reporting collaboratively with reviewed reviewed reviewed collaboratively evidence was
colleagues to review the collaboratively collaboratively collaboratively assessment tools shown
design, selection, assessment tools assessment tools assessment tools with colleagues as
organization and use of with colleagues as with colleagues as with colleagues as shown in the MOV
a range of effective shown in the MOV shown in the MOV shown in the MOV submitted
diagnostic, formative 7.5% submitted submitted submitted
and summative
assessment strategies Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable
consistent with assessment tools assessment tools assessment tools assessment tool as evidence was
curriculum as evidently shown as evidently shown as evidently shown evidently shown in shown
requirements. in any of the in any of the in any of the any of the
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness
Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 4. Assessment 11. Interpreted Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely collaborated No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Services and Reporting collaboratively collaborated with collaborated with collaborated with with colleagues in evidence was
monitoring and colleagues in the colleagues in the colleagues in the the interpretation of shown
evaluation strategies of interpretation of interpretation of interpretation of assessment data
attainment data to assessment data assessment data assessment data as shown in the
support learner as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the MOV submitted
7.5%
progress and MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
achievement.
Efficiency Submitted at least 2 Submitted at least 3 Submitted at least 2 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable
different types of of the same kind of of the same kind of the MOV evidence was
MOV MOV MOV shown
Timeliness
Basic Education 12. Applied skills in the Quality Consistently Frequently applied Occasionally Rarely applied skills No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Services effective communication applied skills in the skills in the applied skills in the in the effective evidence was
of learner needs, effective effective effective communication of shown
progress and communication of communication of communication of learner needs and
achievement to key learner needs and learner needs and learner needs and progress to
stakeholders, including progress to progress to progress to parents/ guardians
parents/guardians. parents/ guardians parents/ guardians parents/ guardians as shown in the
7.5% as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the MOV submitted
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted any 3 Submitted any 2 Submitted any 1

of the acceptable MOV MOV MOV
MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed various Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely performed No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Services related works/activities performed special performed special performed special special tasks and/or evidence was
that contribute to the tasks and/or tasks and/or tasks and/or assignments as shown
teaching-learning assignments as assignments as assignments as shown in the MOV
process. shown in the MOV shown in the MOV shown in the MOV submitted
10% submitted submitted submitted
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted only 3 Submitted only 2 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable
different kinds of different kinds of different kinds of the acceptable evidence was
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV MOV shown
Timeliness
RATING FOR OVER-ALL
#DIV/0! #DIV/0!
ACCOMPLISHMENTS

ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCIES

RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory NAME OF THE TEACHER NAME OF THE RATER NAME OF THE APPROVING AUTHORITY
below 1.499 Poor Ratee Rater Approving Authority
 INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) SUMMARY SHEET
Master Teacher I-IV (Highly Proficient Teacher)

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:

Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review:
Rating Period:

Weight per Weight per Numerical Ratings

KRA Objectives Score
KRA Objective Q E T Ave
Objective 1 7.5%
KRA 1 22.5% Objective 2 7.5%
Objective 3 7.5%
Objective 4 7.5%
KRA 2 22.5% Objective 5 7.5%
Objective 6 7.5%
Objective 7 7.5%
KRA 3 22.5% Objective 8 7.5%
Objective 9 7.5%
Objective 10 7.5%
KRA 4 22.5% Objective 11 7.5%
Objective 12 7.5%
Plus Factor 10% Objective 13 10%
Final Rating
Adjectival Rating

NAME OF THE RATEE NAME OF RATER NAME OF APPROVING AUTHORITY

Ratee Rater Approving Authority