Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 20 views

    Univariate Analysis of Variance: Notes

    Uploaded by

    Chandika Wilda Kusuma
    1) A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to determine the effect of different treatments (Perlakuan) on the dependent variable SERATK. 2) The ANOVA results showed a statistically significant effect of Perlakuan on SERATK at the p < .05 level. 3) Post-hoc comparisons using the Duncan test identified 3 statistically significant groupings of Perlakuan on SERATK.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as RTF, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Univariate Analysis of Variance: Notes

    Uploaded by

    Chandika Wilda Kusuma
    20 views4 pages
    1) A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to determine the effect of different treatments (Perlakuan) on the dependent variable SERATK. 2) The ANOVA results showed a statistically significant effect of Perlakuan on SERATK at the p < .05 level. 3) Post-hoc comparisons using the Duncan test identified 3 statistically significant groupings of Perlakuan on SERATK.

    Original Description:

    serat kasar

    Original Title

    serat kasar

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    RTF, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    1) A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to determine the effect of different treatments (Perlakuan) on the dependent variable SERATK. 2) The ANOVA results showed a statistically significant effect of Perlakuan on SERATK at the p < .05 level. 3) Post-hoc comparisons using the Duncan test identified 3 statistically significant groupings of Perlakuan on SERATK.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as RTF, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as rtf, pdf, or txt
    20 views4 pages

    Univariate Analysis of Variance: Notes

    Uploaded by

    Chandika Wilda Kusuma
    1) A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to determine the effect of different treatments (Perlakuan) on the dependent variable SERATK. 2) The ANOVA results showed a statistically significant effect of Perlakuan on SERATK at the p < .05 level. 3) Post-hoc comparisons using the Duncan test identified 3 statistically significant groupings of Perlakuan on SERATK.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as RTF, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as rtf, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 4

    Warning # 849 in column 23.

    Text: in_ID
    The LOCALE subcommand of the SET command has an invalid parameter. It
    could
    not be mapped to a valid backend locale.
    UNIANOVA SERATK BY Perlakuan
    /METHOD=SSTYPE(3)
    /INTERCEPT=INCLUDE
    /POSTHOC=Perlakuan(DUNCAN)
    /EMMEANS=TABLES(OVERALL)
    /PRINT=LOF HOMOGENEITY DESCRIPTIVE
    /CRITERIA=ALPHA(.05)
    /DESIGN=Perlakuan.

    Univariate Analysis of Variance

    Notes

    Output Created 27-OCT-2018 07:25:40


    Comments
    Input Active Dataset DataSet0
    Filter <none>
    Weight <none>
    Split File <none>
    N of Rows in Working Data
    25
    File
    Missing Value Handling Definition of Missing User-defined missing values are treated
    as missing.
    Cases Used Statistics are based on all cases with
    valid data for all variables in the model.
    Syntax UNIANOVA SERATK BY Perlakuan
    /METHOD=SSTYPE(3)
    /INTERCEPT=INCLUDE
    /POSTHOC=Perlakuan(DUNCAN)
    /EMMEANS=TABLES(OVERALL)
    /PRINT=LOF HOMOGENEITY
    DESCRIPTIVE
    /CRITERIA=ALPHA(.05)
    /DESIGN=Perlakuan.
    Resources Processor Time 00:00:00,16

    Elapsed Time 00:00:00,50


    [DataSet0]

    Between-Subjects Factors

    Value Label N

    Perlakuan 1 P1 5

    2 P2 5

    3 P3 5

    4 P4 5

    5 P5 5

    Descriptive Statistics
    Dependent Variable: SERATK

    Perlakuan Mean Std. Deviation N

    P1 29,3680 3,96164 5
    P2 34,8549 2,38537 5
    P3 34,6311 2,13925 5
    P4 34,1648 2,58368 5
    P5 40,1802 2,45084 5
    Total 34,6398 4,32227 25

    Levene's Test of Equality of Error Variancesa


    Dependent Variable: SERATK

    F df1 df2 Sig.

    1,379 4 20 ,277

    Tests the null hypothesis that the error variance of


    the dependent variable is equal across groups.a
    a. Design: Intercept + Perlakuan

    Tests of Between-Subjects Effects


    Dependent Variable: SERATK

    Type III Sum of


    Source Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

    Corrected Model 293,797a 4 73,449 9,504 ,000


    Intercept 29997,866 1 29997,866 3881,413 ,000
    Perlakuan 293,797 4 73,449 9,504 ,000
    Error 154,572 20 7,729
    Total 30446,235 25
    Corrected Total 448,369 24

    a. R Squared = ,655 (Adjusted R Squared = ,586)

    Lack of Fit Tests


    Dependent Variable: SERATK

    Source Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

    Lack of Fit ,000 0 . . .


    Pure Error 154,572 20 7,729

    Estimated Marginal Means

    Grand Mean
    Dependent Variable: SERATK

    95% Confidence Interval

    Mean Std. Error Lower Bound Upper Bound

    34,640 ,556 33,480 35,800

    Post Hoc Tests

    Perlakuan

    Homogeneous Subsets
    SERATK
    a,b
    Duncan

    Subset

    Perlakuan N 1 2 3

    P1 5 29,3680
    P4 5 34,1648
    P3 5 34,6311
    P2 5 34,8549
    P5 5 40,1802
    Sig. 1,000 ,715 1,000

    Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.


    Based on observed means.
    The error term is Mean Square(Error) = 7,729.
    a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 5,000.
    b. Alpha = ,05.

    You might also like