Nanocomposites: Synthesis, Structure, Properties and New Application Opportunities

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.
net/publication/250029962
Nanocomposites: Synthesis, Structure, Properties and New Application

Opportunities
Article in Materials Research · March 2009

DOI: 10.1590/S1516-14392009000100002
CITATIONS READS
459 4,660
3 authors:
Pedro HC Camargo K.G. Satyanarayana

University of Helsinki Poornaprajna Institute of Scientific Research
151 PUBLICATIONS 7,165 CITATIONS 184 PUBLICATIONS 6,400 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE
Fernando Wypych
Universidade Federal do Paraná
276 PUBLICATIONS 7,518 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Application of layered double hydroxides and hydroxide salts for different purposes View project
Chemistry of soil View project
All content following this page was uploaded by K.G. Satyanarayana on 20 January 2014.
The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

Materials Research, Vol. 12, No. 1, 1-39, 2009 © 2009
Review Article
Nanocomposites: Synthesis, Structure,

Properties and New Application Opportunities
Pedro Henrique Cury Camargo, Kestur Gundappa Satyanarayana*, Fernando Wypych
Departamento de Química, Centro Politécnico, Universidade Federal do Paraná,

Jardim das Américas, 81531-990 Curitiba - PR, Brazil
Received: November 24, 2008; Revised: February 10, 2009
Nanocomposites, a high performance material exhibit unusual property combinations and unique design
possibilities. With an estimated annual growth rate of about 25% and fastest demand to be in engineering
plastics and elastomers, their potential is so striking that they are useful in several areas ranging from packaging
to biomedical applications. In this unified overview the three types of matrix nanocomposites are presented
underlining the need for these materials, their processing methods and some recent results on structure, properties
and potential applications, perspectives including need for such materials in future space mission and other
interesting applications together with market and safety aspects. Possible uses of natural materials such as clay
based minerals, chrysotile and lignocellulosic fibers are highlighted. Being environmentally friendly, applications of
nanocomposites offer new technology and business opportunities for several sectors of the aerospace, automotive,
electronics and biotechnology industries.
Keywords: composites, layered compounds, polymers, metals, ceramics
1. Introduction
Nanocomposites are composites in which at least one of the technology and business opportunities for all sectors of industry, in
phases shows dimensions in the nanometre range (1 nm = 10–9 m)1. addition to being environmentally friendly11.
Nanocomposite materials have emerged as suitable alternatives to As in the case of microcomposites, nanocomposite materials can
overcome limitations of microcomposites and monolithics, while posing be classified, according to their matrix materials, in three different
preparation challenges related to the control of elemental composition categories as shown in Table 2.
and stoichiometry in the nanocluster phase. They are reported to be the Ceramic Matrix Nanocomposites (CMNC);
materials of 21st century in the view of possessing design uniqueness and Metal Matrix Nanocomposites (MMNC) and
property combinations that are not found in conventional composites. Polymer Matrix Nanocomposites (PMNC).
The general understanding of these properties is yet to be reached2, even Nanocomposite systems, including those reinforced with CNTs,
though the first inference on them was reported as early as 19923. have been extensively studied since the 1990s and, accordingly, there
The number of published papers containing words such as nano- has been a steady and continuous increase in the number of publica-
science, nanotechnology, nanomaterials, etc., doubled in 1.6 years4 in tions on the subject, including reviews from time to time2,12-35. In spite
the late 1990s. Also, a literature survey made by the authors reveals of this growth, the majority of the reviews describe the current status
that about 13.420 papers (of which 4028 contain the keywords nano- of only one type of nanocomposite. Thus, there are only two reviews
composite and polymer in Web of Science-ISI: updated on 10 February on CMNC16,32 and three on CNT-reinforced nanocomposites17,20,27 and a
2009) have been published on nanocomposites in the last two decade quite large number on PMNC16,18,19,21,28-35. In the case of PMNC, reviews
(1988‑2008). Similarly, patents with complete document on nanocom- deal with processing aspects, including those on layered silicates18,26,
posites account for about 4663 during the same period as per Scirus conducting and biodegradable polymer-based systems19,34,35, fibre
(www.scirus.com). Additionally, specific conferences and special issues reinforced17,20 and structure/morphology/property aspects16,35, as well
of some journals have been devoted exclusively to the emerging science as with applications and perspectives, including key opportunities
and technology of nanomaterials. and challenges in the development of structural and functional fibre
It has been reported that changes in particle properties can be ob- nanocomposites18,26,29.
served when the particle size is less than a particular level, called ‘the Conducting polymer-based composites are novel materials with
critical size’ (Table 1)5. Additionally, as dimensions reach the nanometre less than a decade of history. It is believed19 that the total control of the
level, interactions at phase interfaces become largely improved, and whole conducting polymer-based composite system and the optimisa-
this is important to enhance materials properties. In this context, the tion of their physical properties (such as electrical conductivity and
surface area/volume ratio of reinforcement materials employed in the colloidal stability) are yet to be achieved, while both their commercial
preparation of nanocomposites is crucial to the understanding of their availability in the near future and a big leap forward for materials
structure–property relationships. Further, discovery of carbon nanotubes science are expected with their appropriate utilization. In the case of
(CNTs) in 19916 and their subsequent use to fabricate composites biodegradable polymer-based nanocomposites, recent developments
exhibiting some of the unique CNT related mechanical, thermal and in preparation, characterization and properties, including crystalliza-
electrical properties7-9 added a new and interesting dimension to this tion behaviour and melt rheology, of both the matrix and the layered
area. The possibility of spinning CNTs into composite products and (montmorillonite) nanocomposites have been discussed34,35. Similarly,
textiles10 made further inroads for the processing and applications of an emphasis on toughness and interfacial bonding between CNTs and
CNT-containing nanomaterials. Nowadays, nanocomposites offer new polymer matrices is critically discussed27 to underline the stress transfer
*e-mail: kgs_satya@yahoo.co.in
2 Camargo et al. Materials Research
Table 1. Feature sizes for significant changes in properties reported in na- addition, the incorporated phase undergoes phase transition in con-
nocomposite systems [reproduced from reference 5 with the kind permission junction with the volume expansion initiated by the stress field of a
of the author and the Japan Society of Powder and Powder Metallurgy]. propagating crack, contributing for the toughening and strengthening
Properties Feature size (nm) at processes, even in nanocomposites36.
which changes might The potential of ceramic matrix nanocomposites (CMNC),
be expected mainly the Al2O3/SiC system, was revealed by the pioneering work of
Catalytic activity <5 Niihara37,38. Most studies reported so far have confirmed the noticeable
strengthening of the Al2O3 matrix after addition of a low (i.e. ~10%)
Making hard magnetic materials soft <20
volume fraction of SiC particles of suitable size and hot pressing of the
Producing refractive index changes <50 resulting mixture. Some studies have explained this toughening mecha-
Producing super paramagnetism and others <100 nism based on the crack-bridging role of the nanosized reinforcements39.
electromagnetic phenomena Consequently, the incorporation of high strength nanofibres into ceramic
Producing strengthening and toughening <100 matrices has allowed the preparation of advanced nanocomposites with
Modifying hardness and plasticity <100 high toughness and superior failure characteristics compared to the
sudden failures of ceramic materials40.
Metal matrix nanocomposites (MMNC) refer to materials consist-
ing of a ductile metal or alloy matrix in which some nanosized rein-
Table 2. Different types of nanocomposites. forcement material is implanted. These materials combine metal and
Class Examples ceramic features, i.e., ductility and toughness with high strength and
Metal Fe-Cr/Al2O3, Ni/Al2O3, Co/Cr, Fe/MgO, Al/CNT, modulus. Thus, metal matrix nanocomposites are suitable for produc-
Mg/CNT tion of materials with high strength in shear/compression processes
Ceramic Al 2O 3/SiO 2, SiO 2/Ni, Al 2O 3/TiO 2, Al 2O 3/SiC, and high service temperature capabilities. They show an extraordinary
Al2O3/CNT potential for application in many areas, such as aerospace and automo-
tive industries and development of structural materials41. Both MMNC
Polymer Thermoplastic/thermoset polymer/layered sili-
and CMNC with CNT nanocomposites hold promise, but also pose
cates, polyester/TiO2, polymer/CNT, polymer/
challenges for real success.
layered double hydroxides.
Polymer materials are widely used in industry due to their ease of
production, lightweight and often ductile nature. However, they have
some disadvantages, such as low modulus and strength compared
to metals and ceramics. In this context, a very effective approach to
from the matrix and the potential of these composites for possible macro improve mechanical properties is to add fibres, whiskers, platelets
scale CNT-polymer production. Here, problems encountered so far are or particles as reinforcements to the polymer matrix. For example,
considered, and hints given regarding a critical volume fraction of CNTs polymers have been filled with several inorganic compounds, either
to get appropriate strengthening (as observed in microcomposites); synthetic or natural, in order to increase heat and impact resistance,
possible failure mechanisms in such composites are also presented. flame retardancy and mechanical strength, and to decrease electrical
Finally, to the best of our knowledge, and in view of the very limited conductivity and gas permeability with respect to oxygen and water
work on metal-based nanocomposites including the ones with CNT vapour25. Furthermore, metal and ceramic reinforcements offer strik-
reinforcements, no review is available to-date on this system. ing routes to certain unique magnetic, electronic, optical or catalytic
Considering these facts and also the absence of a more general properties coming from inorganic nanoparticles, which add to other
review comprising the three different kinds of nanocomposites (metal-, polymer properties such as processibility and film forming capability42.
ceramic- and polymer-based), this paper gives an overview of them, Using this approach, polymers can be improved while keeping their
including those with incorporation of CNTs. However, while doing so lightweight and ductile nature31,43-47. Another important aspect is that
only a few relevant publications2,4,7-9,11,14-308 are considered here. The nanoscale reinforcements have an exceptional potential to generate
main features, current status and recent developments in the area are new phenomena, which leads to special properties in these materials as
provided, focussing on the preparation methods, structure, properties will be seen later. It may be pointed out that the reinforcing efficiency
and applications of these systems to avoid repetition. Also, the poten- of these composites, even at low volume fractions, is comparable to
tial uses of nanocomposites and the opportunities they provide, along 40-50% for fibres in microcomposites34.
with perspectives for the future and market and safety aspects are also Addition of reinforcements to a wide variety of polymer resins
presented. Nanocomposite coating is not covered, in order to keep the produces a dramatic improvement in their biodegradability. This un-
focus of the review. derlines a good example of polymer matrix nanocomposites [PMNC]
1.1. Potentials and opportunities in nanocomposites as promising systems24 for ecofriendly applications. Besides, future
space mission concepts involve large ultra lightweight spacecrafts
Before going into details regarding processing, structure, properties termed “Gossamer”48. The materials required for such spacecrafts
and applications of the three types of nanocomposites, let us look at the should possess and maintain a specific combination of properties for
potentials of these systems and the general opportunities they provide. over a long period (10-30 years) in relatively harsh environments such
Ceramics have good wear resistance and high thermal and chemical as 173 to 373 K for satellites and cycling temperatures of 1273 K for
stability. However, they are brittle. In this context, the low toughness of re-entry vehicles, exposure to atomic O2 and solar radiation. Some of
ceramics has remained a stumbling block for their wider use in industry. the Gossamer spacecraft devices are movable mechanical parts such as
In order to overcome this limitation, ceramic-matrix nanocomposites gears and gyroscopes, and others include solar arrays/sails, antennae
have been receiving attention, primarily due to the significant enhance- and drives, sunshields, rovers, radars, solar concentrators, and reflector
ment on mechanical properties which can be achieved. For example, arrays. It is reported48 that these parts will have to be fabricated from
the incorporation of energy-dissipating components such as whiskers, flexible, appropriate materials, which can be folded or packaged into
fibres, platelets or particles in the ceramic matrix may lead to increased small volumes, similarly to those available in conventional launch ve-
fracture toughness309-311. The reinforcements deflect the crack and/or hicles, and should possess many of the common mission concepts. This
provide bridging elements, hindering further opening of the crack. In is needed since the structure consisting of ultra lightweight parts would
Vol. 12, No.1, 2009 Nanocomposites: Synthesis, Structure, Properties and New Application Opportunities 3
be deployed mechanically or by inflation into a large ultra-lightweight 2. Processing of Nanocomposites

functioning spacecraft once it achieves the required orbit. It is impera-
tive that the above mentioned characteristics should be available in one 2.1. Raw materials
single material. Metal oxide-incorporated polymer nanocomposites
seem to meet these requirements. It is expected that such spacecrafts As with microcomposites, CMNC matrix materials include Al2O3,
offer a significant cost advantage compared to on-orbit construction, SiC, SiN, etc., while metal matrices employed in MMNC are mainly
and the large size can enable some unique missions. Similarly, rocket Al, Mg, Pb, Sn, W and Fe, and a whole range of polymers, e.g. vinyl
propellants are prepared from a polymer-Al/Al2O3 nanocomposite to polymers, condensation polymers, polyolefins, speciality polymers
improve ballistic performance306. In addition, recent information on (including a variety of biodegradable molecules) are used in PMNC.
nanomaterials, nanoindustries and a host of possible A to Z applications In general, it is the reinforcement that is in the nanorange size in these
of polymer nanocomposites have been reported312. materials. Both synthetic and natural crystalline reinforcements have
On the other hand, even after a decade of research27, CNTs have been used, such as Fe and other metal powders, clays, silica, TiO2 and
not fully realized their potentials as nanoscopic reinforcements313-334 other metal oxides, although clays and layered silicates are the most
in polymer matrices. Thus great challenges and opportunities are still common176. This is so due to their availability with very low particle
expected for the system. These are based on the following: sizes and well-known intercalation chemistry18,50,51, in addition to
a) CNTs with small number of defects per unit length possess27 generating improved properties even when they are used at very low
500 times more surface area per gram on the basis of equivalent concentrations252. Most of these reinforcements are prepared by known
volume fraction of a typical carbon fiber, high aspect ratio techniques: chemical, mechanical (e.g. ball milling), vapour deposition,
(~1000), very high tensile properties and electrical and thermal etc.; details of these may be found in many of the references given in
conductivities (more details are given in the next section). the following sections.
b) Research on CNT-related areas has been most active, with Similarly, CNTs are prepared mostly by chemical/vapour deposi-
tion methods and details are available elsewhere319-327. A bibliometric
publications doubling within six months335. Even the patenting
analysis of CNTs made in 2000335 revealed that about 49% of the patents
activity in this area has been impressive, with about 3,000 ap-
filed between 1992-1999 were related to the processing of CNTs and
plications filed from 2001 to June 2006 as per the literature
about 14% to their structure, properties and models. CNTs consist of
survey.
graphene cylinders and are available in two varieties, as single walled
c) Because of their hollow nature, CNTs can be opened and filled
(SWCNT) and multi walled (MWCNT), with about 70% yield in the
with a variety of materials including biological molecules335,
case of SWCNT317. While SWCNTs are single graphene cylinders,
generating technological opportunities. Added to this, the MWCNTs consist of two or more concentric cylindrical sheets of
challenges in obtaining homogeneous dispersions and strong graphene around a central hollow core. Both types exhibit physical
interfacial interactions, which can be better done by surface characteristics of solids, either metallic or semiconducting in nature,
grafting/functionalizations, make the use of CNTs in compos- with microcrystallinity and very high aspect ratios of 103.
ites more intriguing49. Surface modifications of reinforcements are carried out to give
d) Various applications of CNTs in composites have been reported homogeneous distribution with less agglomeration, and to improve
extensively 30,33,313-334. interfacial bonding between the matrix and the nanosized reinforce-
e) The possibility of spinning polymers to obtain textiles10 ments. Details on these can be found in the references given for each
certainly constitutes a great promise for their extended use type of nanocomposites in later Sections. In the case of CNTs, use of
in a variety of applications, particularly in the electronic and surfactants, oxidation or chemical functionalization of surfaces are
thermal management sectors. some of the techniques employed27. Chemical methods may be more
f) Nanoreinforcements with biodegradable polymers have a high effective, particularly for polymer and ceramic matrices. Physical
potential for the design of environmentally friendly ‘green blending and in situ polymerization are used for improving dispersion
materials’ for future applications. in the case of CNT-reinforced polymer composites, while alignment
On the whole, opportunities and rewards appear to be great with of CNTs could be achieved by techniques such as ex-situ techniques
nanocomposites and hence there is a tremendous worldwide interest (filtration, template and plasma-enhanced chemical vapour deposition,
in these materials. force field-inducements, etc.)33.
Table 3a. Processing methods for ceramic nanocomposites.

Method System Procedure Ref.
Powder Process Al2O3/SiC i) Selection of raw materials [mostly powders - small average size, uniformity 38, 53
and high purity]; ii) Mixing by wet ball milling or attrition milling techniques
in organic or aqueous media; iii) Drying by heating, using lamps and/or ov-
ens, or by freeze-drying; iv) consolidation of the solid material by either hot
pressing or gas pressure sintering or slip casting or injection moulding and
pressure filtration.
Polymer Precursor Al2O3/SiC, SiN/SiC Mixing a Si-polymeric precursor with the matrix material → Pyrolysis of the 16,
Process mixture using a microwave oven, generating the reinforcing particles. 54-57
Sol-Gel Process SiO 2 /Ni, ZnO/Co, TiO 2 / Hydrolysis and polycondensation reactions of an (in)organic molecular pre- 58-73
Fe 2O 3, La 2O 3/TiO 2, Al 2O 3/ cursor dissolved in organic media. Reactions lead to the formation of three-
SiC, TiO2/Al2O3, Al2O3/SiO2, dimensional polymers containing metal-oxygen bonds (sol or gel) → drying
Al2O3/SiO2/ ZrO2, TiO2/Fe2 to get a solid material and further consolidation by thermal treatment.
TiO5, NdAlO3/Al2O3
2.2. Processing methods and Chemical methods, which include the sol-gel process, colloidal and
precipitation approaches and the template synthesis. While Table 3a
Despite their nano dimensions, most of the processing techniques lists systems prepared by some of these methods, Table 3b shows their
of the three types of nanocomposites remain almost the same as in advantages and limitations. Scheme 1a depicts the conventional powder
microcomposites. This is also true even for CNT-reinforced composites. method and Scheme 1b illustrates the polymer precursor route used in
Details on these techniques are given below. the synthesis of an Al2O3/SiC nanocomposite.
2.2.1. Ceramic Matrix Nanocomposites (CMNC) A large variety of parameters affecting the sol-gel process, such
as type of solvent, timing, pH, precursor, water/metal ratio, etc., al-
Many methods have been described for the preparation of ceramic low a versatile control of structural and chemical properties of the
matrix nanocomposites 20,38,53-112. The most common methodologies, as final oxide materials61. Regarding the processing of carbon nanotubes
used for microcomposites, are Conventional powder method; Polymer (CNT)-reinforced ceramic nanocomposites, many approaches have been
precursor route; Spray pyrolysis; Vapour techniques (CVD and PVD) described20,74-112. Several of these are listed in Table 3c.
Table 3b. Advantages and limitations of ceramic nanocomposite processing methods.

Method Advantages Limitations Ref.
Powder Process Simple Low formation rate, high temperature, ag- 38, 53
glomeration, poor phase dispersion, formation
of secondary phases in the product.
Polymer Possibility of preparing finer particles; better reinforcement disper- Inhomogeneous and phase-segregated mate- 16,
Precursor sion rials due to agglomeration and dispersion of 54-57
Process ultra-fine particles
Sol-Gel Process Simple, low processing temperature; versatile; high chemical ho- Greater shrinkage and lower amount of voids, 58-73
mogeneity; rigorous stoichiometry control; high purity products; compared to the mixing method.
formation of three dimensional polymers containing metal-oxygen
bonds. Single or multiple matrices. Applicable specifically for the
production of composite materials with liquids or with viscous fluids
that are derived from alkoxides.
Table 3c. Processing methods for ceramic-CNT nanocomposites.

Process System Procedure Ref.
Hot pressing SiO2/CNT, Dispersion of CNTs and SiO2 glass powders into ethanol, stirring and ultrasonic treatment, 20, 74
SiC/CNT drying and hot pressure sintering in pure N2 atmosphere. Mixing of nanoparticles of SiC
and carbon nanotubes
CVD or Spray pyrolysis Al2O3/CNT Preparation of the alumina matrix by anodizing growth of CNTs into its porous walls. 75, 77
CNTs grow into hexagonal array of straight pores extending from the substrate to the
matrix surface.
Catalytic decomposition Al2O3/CNT Use of acetylene over Al2O3 powder impregnated with iron catalysts. 76
Solvothermal process Fe3O4/CNT Dispersion of CNTs in EDA (ethylenediamine) using ultrasonic treatment; addition of 78
an iron(III)-urea complex; heating in a Teflon-lined autoclave maintained at 200 °C for
50 hours, followed by cooling to room temperature.
A-Al2O3 + B-SiC A-Al2O3 + polymer (polycarbosilane)
Ultrasonic bath Coated A-Al2O3 powder
mbols.
Ball-milling with ZrO2 balls in methanol (48 hours) Coating/drying
Drying under infrared lamp Pyrolysis at 1500 °C: SiC nanoparticles
aixa
Hot pressing at 1700 °C under N2 Hot pressing at 1700 °C
em.
Al2O3/SiC nanocomposite Al2O3/SiC nanocomposite

(a) (b)
Scheme 1. a) Conventional Powder Processing, and b) Polymer Precursor route.
2.2.2. Metal Matrix Nanocomposites (MMNC) 2.2.3. Polymer Matrix Nanocomposites (PMNC)
The most common techniques for the processing of metal matrix Many methods have been described for the preparation of polymer
nanocomposites are113-150 Spray pyrolysis; Liquid metal infiltration; nanocomposites, including layered materials and those containing
Rapid solidification; Vapour techniques (PVD, CVD); Electrodeposition CNTs 151-308. The most important ones are i) Intercalation of the polymer
and Chemical methods, which include colloidal and sol-gel processes. or pre-polymer from solution; ii) In-situ intercalative polymerization;
Table 4a lists various systems prepared by these methods and Table 4b iii) Melt intercalation (Figure 1); iv) Direct mixture of polymer and
shows their advantages and limitations. Only two reports are found, particulates; v) Template synthesis; vi) In-situ polymerization; and
for example, on Fe-based nanocomposites prepared by solidifica- vii) Sol-gel process. Publications dealing with various methods for the
tion techniques. The first one, by Branagan121, is called “devitrified incorporation of nanodispersoids into conducting polymers are also
nanocomposite steel”. This was obtained by quenching the metallic available19,201,234; the most prominent one is probably the incorporation
glass obtained from a Fe-based alloy, followed by devitrifying the of inorganic building blocks in organic polymers.
glass precursor through heat treatment above its crystallization tem- Table 5a shows the procedures adopted in some of these processes,
perature. This resulted in a material showing a crystalline multi-phase
while their advantages and limitations are listed in Table 5b.
microstructure. The formation of nanophases was explained by the
Intercalative processes employed for the preparation of polymer-
high nucleation frequency within the limited time for growth of grains
based nanocomposites, including those containing layered silicates,
before impingement. In order to explain the very high hardness of
are shown in Scheme 2. It may be noted that, in this method, a
these Fe-based nanocomposites, Branagan and Tang studied122 novel
nanostructures obtained in bulk Fe alloys by designing alloy composi- range of nanocomposites with structures from intercalated to exfoli-
tions with different amounts of W and C to get maximum solubility. ated can be obtained, depending on the degree of penetration of the
Difficulties have been encountered in preparing composites with very polymer chains into the silicate galleries. As a result, this procedure
fine particles due to their induced agglomeration and non-homogeneous has become standard for the preparation of polymer-layered silicate
distribution. Use of ultrasound helped to improve the wettability be- combinations.
tween the matrix and the particles. The preparation of CNT-reinforced polymer nanocomposites is
A number of CNT-reinforced MMCs have been synthesised by generally performed by different methods, including direct mixing,
different techniques87,135-141 since the first report in 2002137. Some of solution mixing, melt-mixing and in-situ polymerisation. These, as
these techniques are listed in Table 4c. applicable to various systems187,202, are listed in Table 5c.
Table 4a. Processing methods for metal-based nanocomposite systems.

Spray Pyrolysis Fe/MgO, W/Cu i) Dissolution of the inorganic precursors (starting materials) in a suitable solvent to get the 11
liquid source; ii) Generation of a mist from this liquid source using an ultrasonic atomizer;
iii) Use of a carrier gas to carry the mist into a pre-heated chamber. iv) Vaporisation of the
droplets in the chamber and trapping with a filter, promoting their decomposition to give the
respective oxide materials; v) Selective reduction of the metal oxides to produce the respec-
tive metallic materials.
Liquid Infiltration Pb/Cu, Pb/Fe, i) Mixing of fine reinforcement particles with the matrix metal material; ii) Thermal treat- 11,
W/Cu/ Nb/Cu, ment, whereby the matrix melts and surrounds the reinforcements by liquid infiltration; iii) 114-117
Nb/Fe, Al-C60 Further thermal treatment below the matrix melting point, to promote consolidation and
eliminate internal porosity.
Rapid Solidification Al/Pb, Al/X/Zr i) Melting of the metal components together; ii) Keeping the melt above the critical line 118-122
Process(RSP) (X = Si, Cu, Ni), of the miscibility gap between the different components to ensure homogeneity; iii) Rapid
Fe alloy solidification of the melt by any process, such as melt spinning.
RSP with Al/SiC Use of ultrasonics for mixing and for improving wettability between the matrix and the 123
ultrasonics reinforcements.
High Energy Cu-Al2O3 Milling the powders together till the required nanosized alloy is obtained → Nanocompos- 124
Ball Milling ite.
CVD/PVD Al/Mo, Cu/W, PVD: i) Sputtering/evaporation of different components to produce a vapour-phase; ii) 125-129
Cu/Pb Supersaturation of the vapour phase in an inert atmosphere to promote the condensation of
metal nanoparticles; iii) Consolidation of the nanocomposite by thermal treatment under
inert atmosphere.
CVD: Use of chemical reactions to get vapours of materials, followed by consolidation.
Chemical Processes Ag/Au, Fe/SiO2, Colloidal Method: i) Chemical reduction of inorganic salts in solution to synthesize metal 130-134
(Sol-gel, Colloidal) Au/Fe/Au particles; ii) Consolidation of the dry material; iii) Drying and thermal treatment of the result-
ing solid in reducing atmosphere, such as H2, in order to promote selective oxide reduction
and generate the metal component.
Sol-gel process: i) Preparation of two micelle solutions using mesoporous silica containing
0.1 M HAuCl4 (aq.) and 0.6 M NaBH4 (aq.); ii) Mixing under ultraviolet light till complete
reduction of the gold.
For Fe/Au-containing nanocomposites: i) Synthesis of the iron shell; ii) Preparation of the
second shell and drying of the powders after second gold coating; iii) Pressing of the mixture
to get the final material..
Table 4b. Advantages and limitations of processing methods for metal-based nanocomposites.
Process Advantages Limitations Ref.
Spray Pyrolysis Effective preparation of ultra fine, spherical and High cost associated with producing large quantities 11
homogeneous powders in multicomponent systems, of uniform, nanosized particles.
reproductive size and quality.
Liquid Infiltration Short contact times between matrix and reinforce- Use of high temperature; segregation of reinforce- 11,
ments; moulding into different and near net shapes ments; formation of undesired products during 114-117
of different stiffness and enhanced wear resistance; processing.
rapid solidification; both lab scale and industrial
scale production.
Rapid Solidification Simple; effective. Only metal-metal nanocomposites; induced ag- 118-122
Process (RSP) glomeration and non-homogeneous distribution of
fine particles.
RSP with ultrasonics Good distribution without agglomeration, even with 123
fine particles.
High Energy Ball Homogeneous mixing and uniform distribution. 124
Milling
CVD/PVD Capability to produce highly dense and pure materi- Optimization of many parameters; cost; relative 125-129
als; uniform thick films; adhesion at high deposition complexity.
rates; good reproducibility.
Chemical Processes Simple; low processing temperature; versatile; high Weak bonding, low wear-resistance, high permeability 130-134
(Sol-Gel, Colloidal) chemical homogeneity; rigorous stoichiometry and difficult control of porosity.
control; high purity products.
Table 4c. Processes for preparing metal-CNT nanocomposite systems.

Electroless Co-CNT i) Use of electroless plating bath containing the activated CNTs, the cobalt precursor, the reducing 135
Coating agent CoSO4.7H2O, the complexing agent and a buffer. CNT with deposit of Co coating results;
ii) Thermal treatment at 873 K, 200 torr, under a 10% H2/N2 flow gas.
Electroless Sn / CNTs, SnSb0.5/ Reduction of SnCl2 and SbCl3 precursors by KBH4 in the presence of CNTs. 136,
Coating CNT and Sn 2 Sb/ 137
CNT
Hot Pressing Al/CNT Mixing of powders through grinding for 30 minutes and hot pressing at 793 K under a pressure 138
of 25 MPa.
Nanoscale Al/CNT Preparation of the precursor of MWCNT (13 nm dia and 10-50 µm long) with natural rubber and 139
Dispersion ethyl propylene; mixing with Al powder; rolling into sheets by compression moulding at 353 K;
placing of this precursor on an Al (99.85%) plate of 28 µm grain size; heating to 1073 K in N2
atmosphere for one hour; final cooling.
PM/Infiltration Mg-Al2O3f-CNT a) Mechanical mixing of Mg powders with MWCNT (1 vol. %) using alcohol and acid; sinterisa- 141
tion at 550 °C under 25 MPa pressure;
b) Infiltration of molten Mg through performs of Al2O3 fibers (25 vol. %; 40-100 µm long) covered
with MWCNTs under gas pressure.
Silicate layer In the case of nanocomposites containing layered reinforcements,

Polymer depending on the nature of the components (layered silicate, organic
Heat Aliphatic chains cation and polymer matrix), the method of preparation and the strength
+ Intermolecular interactions
of interfacial interactions between the polymer matrix and the layered
silicate (modified or not), three different types of PLS nanocomposites
may be obtained, as illustrated in Figure 218.
When the polymer is unable to intercalate between the silicate
sheets, a phase-separated composite (Figure 2) is obtained, whose
Figure 1. Melt intercalation synthesis of polymer/clay nanocomposites [re- properties stay in the same range as that of traditional microcomposites.
produced from ref. 165 with the kind permission of the authors, the American On the other hand, in intercalated nanocomposites, the insertion of a
Chemical Society, USA].
polymer matrix into the layered silicate structure occurs in a crystal-
lographically regular fashion, regardless of the clay to polymer ratio. A
Similarly, different processing techniques, mostly chemical and well ordered multilayer morphology built up with alternating polymeric
electrochemical methods, have been employed for the preparation of and inorganic layers is generated. Normally, only a few molecular layers
conducting polymer nanocomposites19. Table 6a summarizes these of polymer can be intercalated in these materials.
methods, while a relevant categorization of these nanocomposites is The in-situ method can be used with mineral/vegetal fibres, with the
presented in Table 6b. possibility to attach the polymer to the grafted surface through linking
Table 5a. Processing methods for polymer-based nanocomposite systems.

Intercalation / Clay with PCL, PLA, HDPE, PEO, Employed for layered reinforcing material in which the polymer may 5, 18,
Prepolymer from PVA, PVP, PVA, etc. intercalate. Mostly for layered silicates, with intercalation of the polymer 151-
Solution or pre-polymer from solution. Use of a solvent in which the polymer or 157
pre-polymer is soluble and the silicate layers are swellable.
In-situ Intercalative Montmorillonate with N6/PCL/ Encasing of the layered silicate within the liquid monomer or a mono- 158-
Polymerization PMMA /PU/Epoxy mer solution → formation of polymer between the intercalated sheets. 164
Polymerization by heat or radiation, by diffusion of a suitable initiator or
by a catalyst fixed through cation exchange inside the interlayer, before
the swelling step.
Melt Intercalation Montmorillonate with PS/PEO/PP/ Annealing of a mixture of the polymer and the layered host above the 165-
PVP, Clay-PVPH softening point of the polymer, statically or under shear. Diffusion of 169
polymer chains from the bulk polymer melt into the galleries between
the host layers during annealing (Figure 1).
Template Synthesis Hectorite with PVPR, HPMC, In situ formation of the layered structure of the inorganic material in an 170-
PAN, PDDA, PANI aqueous solution containing the polymer. The water soluble polymer acts 175
as a template for the formation of layers. Widely used for the synthesis of
LDH nanocomposites, but less developed for layered silicates.
(a) Mixing PVA)/Ag; PMMA/Pd Polyester/ (a) Mixing of either polymer or monomer with reinforcing materials; 178-
(b) In situ TiO2 (b1) Dispersion of inorganic particles into a precursor of the polymeric 183
polymerization PET/CaCO3, Epoxy vinyl ester/ matrix (monomer); (b2) Polymerization of the mixture by addition of
Fe3O4 ; Epoxy vinyl ester/γ-Fe2O3; an appropriate catalyst;
Poly (acrylic acid)(PAA)/Ag, PAA/ (b3) Processing of this material by conventional moulding technolo-
Ni and PAA/Cu gies.
AgNO3, NiSO4 and CuSO4; Use of ultrasonics for dispersion in epoxy systems. Exposition of AG
systems to 60 Co γ-ray to promote simultaneous polymerization and
metal nanoparticle formation.
Sol-Gel Process Polyimide/SiO2; 2-hydroxyethyl Embedding of organic molecules and monomers on sol-gel matrices; 24,
acrylate (HEA)/SiO2, polyimide/ introduction of organic groups by formation of chemical bonds → In- 184-
silica. PMMA/ SiO2, polyethylacr- situ formation of sol-gel matrix within the polymer and/or simultaneous 186
ylate/ SiO2, polycarbonate / SiO2 generation of inorganic /organic networks.
and poly (amide-imide)/TiO2
Table 5b. Advantages and limitations of polymer-based nanocomposite processing methods.

Process Advantages Limitations Ref.
Intercalation / Synthesis of intercalated nanocomposites based Industrial use of large amounts of solvents. 5, 18,
Prepolymer from on polymers with low or even no polarity. Prepa- 151-157
Solution ration of homogeneous dispersions of the filler.
In-situ Intercalative Easy procedure, based on the dispersion of the Difficult control of intragallery polymerization. Limited 158-164
Polymerization filler in the polymer precursors. applications.
Melt Intercalation Environmentally benign; use of polymers not Limited applications to polyolefins, who represent the 165-169
suited for other processes; compatible with in- majority of used polymers.
dustrial polymer processes.
Template Synthesis Large scale production; easy procedure. Limited applications; based mainly in water soluble 170-175
polymers, contaminated by side products.
Sol-Gel Process See Table 3b. See Table 3b.
Table 5c. Processing methods for polymer-CNT nanocomposite systems.

Process System Procedure Remarks Ref.
Direct Mixing Thermoset Resins Dispersion of CNTs; Cure. 187
Solution Mixing Thermoplastic Resins
Dispersion of 0.2-1% CNTs, (100 nm Modification of polymer behaviour; 188-193
(PS/Epoxy) dia, 10 µm long); Removal of solvent synergistic effect; shape memory
or precipitation of polymer; Cure. nanocomposites.
Melt Mixing Polymers, N6 Mechanical mixing of CNTs with pre- Use of 0.2-2.0% MWCNT, twin screw 49, 194,
polymer melt followed by extrusion, mixer. 195
injection or compression moulding.
In-situ Polymerization Polyaniline-CNT, Use of ultrasonics for dispersion in Preparation of the polymer with CNT, 196-202
MMA‑CNT, Epoxy-CNT, monomer/matrix; Cure. good chemical bonding.
Poly(ether-ester)
Others PP-CNT, PVK-SWCNT, Solid-state mechanochemical pulveriza- 0-10 wt. (%) CNTs 203-206
iPP-SWCNT, PANi‑ tion; blending + sonication; melt blend-
SWCNT ing; VDP.
Table 6a. Summary of processing methods for conducting polymer nanocomposites [reproduced from ref. 19 with the permission of the authors and the
American Chemical Society, USA]
Polymer of interest Inorganic particle (core) Significant characterization / Applications
(Shell)
PPy and PAn SiO2 (1 μm, 35 nm, 20 nm), SnO2- Stable colloidal form, ‘raspberry morphology’ and inorganic stable rich
Sb(10 nm), Stringy SiO2 surface.
(40-300 nm long)
PPy and PAn CeO2 (0.52 μm), CuO (1.6 μm), Colloidally stable nanocomposite with low dc conductivity and formed
α-Fe 2 O 3 (Sph, Polyhedral and without a polymerisation initiator.
spindle shaped), NiO (3.8 μm),
SiO2 (0.46 μm)
PPy and PAn BaSO4(20 nm), Colloidal gold In situ formation of colloidal nanocomposite within the microemulsion or
(7-9 nm), Al2O3 membrane inside the Al2O3 membrane.
Ppy, Pan, NVC and PPV ZrO2 (20-30 nm), Fe2O3 (25-50 nm), Nanocomposites in macroscopic precipitate form or with limited colloidal
SiO2, n-TiO2 (~10 nm), Al2O3 stability but improved thermal and electrical properties and novel transport
(35-40 nm), MgO (2-4 μm), CB properties.
PPy and PAOABSA MS (15-30 nm), FexOy (14 nm), Nanocomposites with significant magnetic susceptibility.
Fe2O3 (~15-50 nm), γ-Fe2O3
(85 nm),
PPy and PAn BT (~1 μm), LiMnO2, LiMnO4, Nanocomposites with important charge storage and dielectric properties,
V2O5, β-MnO2, PMo12, suitable for cathode applications.
H3PMo12O40, CB, Fe2O3
(4 nm, 40 nm)
Ppy, Pan, PTh and PEDOT Pt (~4 nm), PtO2, Pt, Cu, Pd, SiO2 Nanocomposites with catalytically important metals; catalytic applica-
(20 nm), & bimetallic couples tions.
PPy and PAn SiO2 (20 nm) Grafted surface nanocomposites - important for immunodiagnostic assays.
PPy SiO2, PB, MnO2, Ta2O5, TiO2 Electrochemically synthesised composite films with improved charge stor-
age properties.
PPy and PAn WO3 Nanocomposite films with important ECD application and optical activity.
Table 6b. Categorization of processing methods for conducting polymer nanocomposites [reproduced from reference 19 with the permission of the authors
and the American Chemical Society, USA].
Conducting polymer nanocomposites
Inorganic-in-organic Organic-in-inorganic
mbols.
Chemical preparation Electrochemical preparation

Nanocomposites with colloidal stability (SiO2, SnO2, BaSO4, etc., as Nanocomposites with charge storage, optical and electrochromic activities
core) (incorporation of MnO2, SnO2, CB, PB, WO3, SiO2, etc.)
Nanocomposites with improved physical and mechanical properties Nanocomposites with catalytic activities (incorporation of catalytically
(Fe2O3, ZrO2, TiO2, etc., as incorporated materials) active Pt, Pd, Cu, etc. microparticles and some bimetallic couples like
aixa Pd/Cu, etc.)
Nanocomposites with magnetic susceptibility (using Fe2O3, γ-Fe2O3, Nanocomposites with magnetic susceptibility
em. etc., magnetic particles) (γ-Fe2O3 magnetic macroanion)
Nanocomposites with dielectric, energy storage, piezoresistive and -
catalytic activities (with BT, POM, PtO2, TiO2, Pd, Pt, etc., incorpora-
tion)
Nanocomposites with grafted surface (NH2/COOH functional groups -
on surface and colloidal silica as core)
groups (coupling agents), which optimize the interface bonding and, ous factors is still lacking, such as i) the use of an appropriate method
consequently, the mechanical properties176. for a specific matrix-reinforcement combination or ii) the maximum
Despite the successful use of these different methods for the amount of reinforcements to give optimum property combinations
preparation of polymer-based nanocomposites, information on vari- and lower the cost of the processes, etc. Therefore, it is still necessary
to look into these aspects including use of simulation and modelling

techniques.
Layered silicate is first swollen in a solvent
Polymer solution
such as water, chloroform or toluene
3. Structure and Properties
The structure of nanocomposites usually consists of the matrix mate-
ls. rial containing the nanosized reinforcement components in the form of
particles, whiskers, fibres, nanotubes, etc.93. Different investigators have
After mixing, the polymer chains intercalated and displace employed various equipments and techniques for the characterization of
the solvent within the interlayer of the silicate nanocomposites, including atomic force microscopy (AFM), scanning
tunnelling microscopy (STM), Fourier transformed infrared spectroscopy
(FTIR), X ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), nuclear magnetic
Upon solvent removal, the intercalated structure remains, resonance (NMR), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), scanning and
resulting in the polymer-layered silicate nanocomposite transmission electron microscopy (SEM/TEM), etc. For example, AFM
is a powerful tool to study the surface even down to the nanometre scale,
Scheme 2. Intercalation of polymer or pre-polymer from solution. as evident from the work of Veith et al.303,304. Simultaneous small angle
X ray scattering (SAXS) and X ray diffractometry (XRD) studies have
been recently used for quantitative characterization of nanostructures
and crystallite structures in some nanocomposites34,307,308. In addition,
theoretical calculations/simulations have been worked out to predict
strength properties, including stress/strain curves41,52,166,169,207-212,290,291.
Before discussing structure and properties of nanocomposites,
including those containing CNTs, a brief description of CNTs will be
Layered silicate Polymer made here313-334, because of their unique properties compared to other
ls. reinforcements. Briefly, the density of SWCNTs is less than one sixth
of that of steel335 while the density of MWCNT is one half of that of
Al30. Tensile strengths of SWCNT and MWCNTs are reported313‑316,335
to be in a range much higher than of high strength steel, while Young’s
modulus values are comparable to those of diamond. They exhibit tre-
mendous resilience, in that they can sustain bending to large angles and
restraightening without damage, in which they differ from the plastic
deformation of metals and the brittle fracture of carbon fibres. Similarly,
theoretical thermal and electrical conductivities are comparable with that
Phase separated Intercalated Exfoliated of diamond, with an almost negligible thermal expansion coefficient30.
(microcomposite) (nanocomposite) (nanocomposite) They also exhibit high thermal stability both in air and in vacuum, com-
(a) (b) (c) pared to the lower values obtained for metal wires in microchips, and
high parallel and perpendicular magnetic susceptibilities. Theoretical
Figure 2. Different types of composites arising from the interaction of layered
surface area values of these materials are ca. 3,000 m2/g 318-321, while the
silicates, polymers: a) Phase-separated microcomposite; b) Intercalated nano-
composite, and c) Exfoliated nanocomposite [reproduced from reference 18 experimentally reported values vary depending on the gas used during
with the kind permission of the authors, Elsevier]. the measurements. This information is summarized in Table 7.
Table 7. Properties of Carbon Nanotubes30,313-318,335.

Properties SWNT MWNT Corresponding values in other known materials
Density (Mgm–3) 0.8 1.33-1.40 One sixth of steel and one-half of the density of
(Expt.) aluminium.
1.8 (Theor.)
Surface Area (m2.g–1) 150-1587 (Expt.) - Much higher than known materials.
3000 (Theor.)
Elastic modulus (TPa) 1.2 0.4-3.7 Comparable to diamond / 1.4 times of graphite.
Tensile Strength (GPa) 50-500 10-60 Much higher than high-strength steels.
Resilience Can sustain bending to large angles - Different from the plastic deformation of metals and
and restraightening without dam- brittle fracture of carbon fibres.
age.
Current carrying capability 1·109 - Copper wires burn out at about 1·106.
(Amp/cm2)
Electrical Conductivity (μΩ) 50-500 - -
Thermal Conductivity (W/mK) 6000 at 273 K - Comparable with that of diamond (3320).
Thermal Stability (K) 3073 in vacuum and 823 in air - Metal wires in microchips melt at 873-1273.
Magnetic Susceptibility (emu/kg) 500 (Parallel) - -
22 x 103 (Perpendicular with plane)
3.1. Ceramic matrix nanocomposites monolithic matrix component. For example, the Si3N4/30% SiC system
has strength of 1080 MPa up to 1673 K, whereas the strength of the
Ceramics are usually brittle and easily fractured as consequence
monolithic sample decreases considerably at high temperatures. Fur-
of crack propagation. There have been attempts to make ceramics suit-
thermore, at 1673 K and tension of 200 MPa, Si3N4 fails after 0.4 hours
able for engineering applications through the incorporation of a ductile
at 0.3% strain, whereas the Si3N4/10% SiC nanocomposite does not fail
metal phase or another ceramic into the matrix. This leads to improved
even after 1,000 hours at 1.5% strain.
mechanical properties such as hardness and fracture toughness, which
occur as a result of the relationship between the different phases, matrix Coming to morphological studies, Figure 3a-c shows the micro-
and reinforcements, at the phase boundaries throughout the material. structures of some ceramic matrix nanocomposites of Al2O3 and Fe2O3
The surface area/volume ratio of the reinforcement materials is of containing a good distribution of Co and Ni nanoparticles or of CNTs.
fundamental importance in the understanding of the structure–property The presence of metal particles leads to the improvement of electrical
relationship in CMNCs. We shall therefore first discuss these improve- and thermal conductivities and of magnetic, electronic and optical
ments in some ceramic-based nanocomposites and relate them with the properties, as well as to the development of novel and unique features
observed morphologies. due to the nanosized components.
Figure 4 shows SEM and TEM images of the Al2O3-SiC nanocom-
3.1.1. Ceramic matrix-discontinuous reinforcement posites, while Figure 5 shows the high resolution TEM photographs.
nanocomposite systems SEM results (Figure 4a) reveal agglomeration of the matrix particles.
Table 8 shows examples of ceramic nanocomposites and of the The grains are ~2 µm in size. TEM analysis (Figure 4b) shows a char-
observed improvements in their properties compared to the respective acteristic intra/intergranular structure. The intragranular SiC particle
monolithic materials. Table 9 compares the mechanical properties of is approximately 500 nm in size (Figure 4c). In addition, in the upper
the Al2O3/SiC system and its microcomposite counterpart39,103-105. part of the HRTEM image (Figure 5), a layer of an amorphous phase is
It can be seen from these tables that there is a significant improve- clearly visible in a typically (local) edge-on orientation at the interface
ment in the strength of the nanocomposite compared with its micro of two crystalline phases. However, this layer fades away in the lower
counterpart. The fracture strength, as an example, is noticeably higher section of the image, where the two phases seem to merge with an
because of the higher interfacial interaction between the particles in atomic level lattice match pattern39,103-105.
nanocomposites. Besides, Al2O3-5 to 15% SiC systems exhibited90 su- Figure 6 shows the microstructure of the Si3N4/SiC nanocomposite.
perficial grooves of plastic deformation compared to the intergranular One can observe that the nanosized SiC particles are intimately dis-
fracture observed in monolithic materials. There was no time-dependant persed through out the matrix material. In addition, they are embedded
wear transition for these composites even at loads of 20-100 N, but pre- within the matrix of large Si3N4 grains and at grain boundaries, having
transition wear rates of 1-2 x 10–8 mm/Nm were observed for both the inter- and intragranular environments106,107. These morphologies help
monolithic and composite materials. The specific wear rate decreased understanding the observed properties.
with sliding distance. This enhancement of properties observed in ce- Another aspect to be noted is the mechanism of growth of the
ramic nanocomposites can also be illustrated by the Si3N4/SiC system two phases in nanocomposites, as illustrated by AFM photographs111.
(Table 10)106,107. Figure 7 shows AFM images of two metal oxide-based nanocomposite
It can be seen that the nanocomposite presents significant improve- systems, viz., Fe2O3/Co3O4 and NiO/Co3O4. From Figure 7b-c, one
ments in fracture strength and toughness, high temperature strength can see the production of big particles in the NiO/Co3O4 system with
and creep resistance compared with its micro counterpart and to the increasing supported oxide concentration. TEM images of these oxide
systems support different growth mechanisms. In the case of Fe2O3/
Co3O4, small clusters of Fe2O3 got wetted on the surface of Co3O4,
while NiO grew as isolated particles, showing a larger diameter in the
Table 8. Examples of ceramic matrix nanocomposites and their properties.
NiO/Co3O4 system.
Matrix/Reinforcements Properties Reference
Si3N4/SiC Improved strength 97
and toughness
Table 10. Fracture strength and fracture toughness for Si N /SiC nano- and
MoSi2/ZrO2 - 98 microcomposites106, 107.
3 4
B4C/TiB2, - 99 Properties/Material Si3N4/SiC Si3N4/SiC

Al2O3/SiC - 38 composite nanocomposite
MgO/SiC - 37 Fracture Strength [MPa] 700 1300
Mullite/SiC - 100 Fracture Toughness [MPam1/2] 5.3 7
Al2O3/ZrO2 - 101
Al2O3/Mo, Al2O3/W - 102
Al2O3/NdAlO3 Improved 73
photoluminescence
Table 9. Properties of Al O /SiC nano- and microcomposites

39, 103
.
2 3
Properties/Material Al2O3/SiCp Al2O3/SiCp

composite nanocomposite 500 nm 500 nm 50 nm
Vickers Hardness [GPa] - 22 (a) (b) (c)
Young’s Modulus [GPa] - 383 Figure 3. TEM micrographs of a) Al2O3/10 wt. (%) Co b) Al2O3/5 vol. %
Fracture Strength [MPa] 106-283 549-646 Ni, c) Fe3O4/CNTs nanocomposites [reproduced from references 93, 94, 78,
respectively, with the kind permission of the authors, Elsevier, the American
Fracture Toughness [MPam1/2] 2.4-6.0 4.6–5.5
ls.
5.00 k 1.0.2.6 4 Mm 11 5 k 0.1.0.8 0.2 Mm
(a) (b) (c)

Figure 4. a) SEM, b) TEM images of Al2O3/SiC nanocomposites; and c) TEM (high magnification) showing a SiC grain [reproduced from references 103, 104
with the kind permission of the authors, Elsevier].
guras - Materials Research SiC
(Roman), tamanho 8. Intragranular SiC

nhas com 0.5 de Stroke.
Intergranular
centes a "Dados gráficos" com 0.6 de Stroke. SiC
ouver rosa do ventos na imagem original, substituir pela padrão da paleta symbols.
o de barras com 10% de preto quando houver texto e 50% quando não.
ela ou figura devem estar todos em Inglês.
em estar dentro de caixas de texto com 2 mm de distância nas extremidades. A= Si3N4
ra ou gráfico deve estar em "Sentence case".
0.1 Mm 0.5 Mm
pas deverá ter 1 ponto de Stroke.
(a) (b)
fias, seguir padrão correto (respeitando estilo de escala, posição dos dados, caixa
arte inferior da imagem, fundo preto).
Figure 6. TEM images of Si3N4/SiC nanocomposites [reproduced from Ref-
presentam figuras ex: (a), devem estar centralizadas na parte inferior da imagem. erence 107 with the kind permission of the authors, Elsevier, the American
Institute of Chemical Engineers @ 1997, AIChME].
Al2O3
guras - Materials Research
(Roman), tamanho 8. SiC

centes a "Dados gráficos" com 0.6 de Stroke.
o de barras com 10% de preto quando houver texto e 50% quando não. (a) (b) (c)
em estar dentro de caixas de texto com 2 mm de distância4 nas Figure 7. AFM images (0.3 x 0.3 µm2) of nanocomposite oxides: a) Fe2O3/
nm extremidades. Co3O4 (Fe/Co nominal atomic ratio 0.05); b) NiO/Co3O4 (Ni/Co nominal
Figure 5. HRTEM image of the interface region between Al2O3, SiC particles atomic ratio 0.05), c) NiO/Co3O4 (Ni/Co nominal atomic ratio 0.1) [reproduced
in the Al O /SiC nanocomposite [reproduced from reference 39 with the kind from reference 111 with the kind permission of the authors, the American
2 3
permission of the authors,
fias, seguir padrão correto (respeitando Elsevier].
estilo de escala, posição dos dados, caixa Chemical Society, USA].
presentam figuras ex: (a), devem estar centralizadas na parte inferior da imagem.
higher than 5% cause decrease in these two properties. At 5 vol. %,

3.1.2. Ceramic matrix-CNT Systems
the increment in strength and fracture toughness, compared with that
The effect of CNT loading on mechanical properties of the SiO2/ of monolithic SiO2, is up to 65 and 100%, respectively. This increase
CNT nanocomposites is shown in Figure 874. When the volume content in mechanical properties is due to the large aspect ratio and excel-
of CNT is lower than 5 vol. %, both bending strength and fracture lent mechanical properties of CNTs, according to the theory of short
toughness increase with increasing volume of CNTs. However, loadings fibre-reinforced composites 4. The decrease in bending strength at high
loading is due to the hindrance caused by CNTs during densification, Ma and co-workers prepared SiC/CNTs which showed a 10%
as they show a higher probability for agglomeration. Consequently, the improvement in the strength and fracture toughness as compared to
increased agglomeration leads to the loss of bonding. Also, the higher the monolithic ceramics108. These modest results were attributed to
the loading of CNTs, the higher is their pull out from the matrix during nanotube/matrix debonding and crack deflection20. As a consequence,
stress transfer274. many attempts have been made to develop improved mechanical proper-
Unusual behaviours such as high contact-damage resistance without ties through the incorporation of CNTs in ceramic matrices. However,
a corresponding improvement in toughness have also been reported in the observed improvements were not as dramatic as expected. In this
Al2O3/nanotube composites91,92. The microhardness of these systems in- context, recently, Zhan et al.109 successfully applied SWCNTs in the
creases as the CNT content is increased up to 4 wt. (%). This is probably reinforcement of ceramic composites through spark-plasma sintering
due to grain size effects and the reinforcement role of CNTs, as shown (SPS), which resulted in a 194% increase in fracture toughness over pure
in Figure 9a. However, the effect decreases again above 4 wt. (%), alumina [~9.7 MPam1/2 in the 10 vol. % SWCNT/Al2O3 nanocomposite].
probably due to the difficulty in dispersing CNTs homogeneously in Also, the electrical properties of ceramic / CNTs nanocomposites have
the composite and to the problem of poor cohesion between CNTs and been sharply enhanced, as illustrated in Table 11, due to the outstanding
the matrix107. This trend is also observed in the wear loss and friction electrical properties of CNTs110.
coefficient, as shown in Figure 9b. It can be seen that the wear loss of Using Griffith’s theory and residual stress around nanoparticles in
the 4 wt. (%) composite decreased by nearly 45% as compared to that the matrix, Awaji et al.36 have proposed a mechanism for toughening and
of the pure matrix. As the CNT content increased above 10 wt. (%), strengthening in ceramic-based nanocomposites. They observed that the
wear losses also notably increased. Friction coefficients decreased coefficient of thermal expansion of both matrix and nanoparticles had an
gradually as the CNT content increased from 0 to 10 wt. (%), and then effect on residual stresses which was sufficient to cause lattice defects
dropped sharply at 12.5% CNT content. This trend is attributed to the such as dislocations around particles in ceramics. Dislocations were also
lubricating properties of the CNTs (graphite)76. generated around the particle by the nanoparticles in the matrix.
A 24% increase in fracture toughness (3.4-4.2 MPam1/2) over the
matrix was observed in nanograined Al2O3 composite (average diameter
90 39 nm) containing 10 vol. % MWCNT85, which was attributed to the
2.4 oxidation of CNTs before dispersion. In this case the material was
80 produced in three conditions, viz., mixed, hot pressed (1573 K) and
2.2
Frature toughness (MPam1/2)
70
Bending strength (MPa)
2.0
Table 11. Electrical conductivity of CNT ceramic nanocomposites [repro-
60 1.8 duced from reference 110 with permission of the authors and the American
Institute of Physics, USA].
50 1.6
Materials Electrical conductivity
1.4 (S/m)
40
Pure Al2O3 10–12
1.2
30 Al2O3/ CNT 5.7-vol. %/Carbon Black 15
1.0 Al2O3/ SWCNT 5.7-vol. % 1050
20
10 15 0
20 255 30 Al2O3/ SWCNT 10-vol. % 1510
CNT volume content % Al2O3/ SWCNT 15-vol. % 3345
Figure 8. Effect of CNT volume content on the mechanical properties of SiO2/ Al2O3/Fe 4.3-vol. %/ CNT 8.5-vol. % 40-80
CNT nanocomposites [reproduced from reference 74 with the kind permission
of the authors, Elsevier]. Al2O3/Fe 4.3-vol. %/ CNT 10-vol. % 280-400
2400 0.6 3.0

2200
2000 0.5 2.5
Vickers microhandness (kg.mm–2)
1800
Friction coefficient
0.4 2.0
Wear loss (mg)
1600
1400
0.3 1.5
1200
1000 0.2 1.0
800
600 0.1 0.5
400
200 0.0 0.0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
0 CNT content wt.
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
CNT content (wt. (%)) Friction coefficient Wear loss
(a) (b)
Figure 9. Variations of a) microhardness, and b) friction coefficient, wear loss as a function of CNT content in Al2O3/CNT materials [reproduced from refer-
ence 76 with the kind permission of the authors, Elsevier].
sintered to near theoretical density. Figures 10 and 11 show TEM and is a linear increase in hardness with increasing volume fraction of the
SEM images of the SiO2/CNT and Al2O3/CNT systems respectively74,76, harder phase (SiC) until the maximum value of 2.6 GPa for the sample
where it can be seen that CNTs are homogeneously dispersed in both that contains 10 vol. % of SiC. The values of Young’s and shear modu-
matrices. This could explain the observed strength properties. lus increase significantly with increasing SiC content, suggesting the
It can be seen that each processing method has its own advantages formation of a nanocomposite material containing a brittle phase (SiC)
in yielding appropriate structures and properties for each system, and embedded in the ductile Al matrix. Table 14 shows some mechanical
hence there is need to find out proper combinations of processing, properties of both nano- and microcomposites of Al/SiC.
together with the suitable systems, to arrive at optimum properties. It can be clearly seen that the Al/SiC nanocomposite exhibits no-
tably higher Young’s modulus and hardness than its micro counterpart.
3.2. Metal matrix nanocomposites For example, the nanocomposite shows 12.6% increase in hardness
and 105.1% in Young’s modulus145-147. Also, Al/Pb nanocomposites
3.2.1. Metal – discontinuous reinforcement systems exhibited improved frictional features119-121. The nanosized dispersoids
lowered the coefficient of friction [0.3 for nanocomposite compared to
Table 12 illustrates examples of some metal matrix nanocomposites
0.42 for the microcomposite] due to the formation of a uniform lead-rich
and their respective properties.
tribo layer, with material transfer being an order of magnitude lower
The α-Fe/Fe23C6/Fe3B system provides a good example of how
than in the micro-sized counterpart. The comparative wear loss of nano
unique properties may arise from metal nanocomposites. Table 13
and microsized Al/Pb composites is shown in Figure 13119.
shows the measured hardness values (GPa) of the ingot and ribbon
Coming to the morphological studies of metal matrix-based na-
samples prepared from this system122. Vickers hardness values of these
nocomposites, analysis of the structure and identification of the nano-
two forms of the alloy produced by Branagan and Tang122 were found
phases in α-Fe/Fe23C6/Fe3B alloys using X ray diffraction and TEM with
to be 10.3 and 11 GPa in the as-solidified condition. The ribbon variety
EDAX revealed the existence of two cubic and one tetragonal phase.
showed increased hardness with increasing heat treatment temperature,
The three phases exhibited the size of 4 µm [4,000 nm] in the ingot
showing a maximum of 16.2 GPa at 973 K [higher than any existing
alloy, while in the heat-treated ribbon alloy the size of the phases was
commercial steel and hard alloys] and there after decreasing to 10.5 GPa
in the range of 100-130 nm. Based on these, the observed hardness was
at 1123 K. This can be compared to the decreasing trend of the ingot
attributed to the nanostructure and to the super saturation of Cr and W
type (8 and 6.6 GPa at 873 and 973 K respectively).
above their equilibrium solubility in Fe. These studies also suggested
The Al/SiC system also illustrates the advantages of metal nano-
the possible synthesis of very hard and inexpensive materials for three
composites compared to their micro counterparts145-147. Figure 12a shows
bodies wear applications and to replace expensive hard metals such as
plots of Vickers hardness vs. SiC content, while Figure 12b presents
in cobalt-based materials. Figure 14 shows TEM/SAED images of this
plots of Young’s and shear modulus as a function of SiC content. There
Table 12. Examples of metal nanocomposites and their properties.

Matrix/reinforcement Properties Reference
Ag/Au Improvement in catalytic 96
activity
Ni/PSZ and Ni/YSZ Improved hardness and 5, 13
strength
ls. Cu/Nb Improved microhardness 123
Al/AlN Higher compression 95
resistance and low strain
rate
Al/SiC Improved hardness and 143
elastic moduli
CNT/Sb and CNT/SnSb0.5 Improvements in Li+ 136, 137
intercalation properties
α-Fe/Fe23C6/Fe3B Drastic improvement 122
in hardness
1 Mm
Cu/Al2O3 Improved microhardness 124
Figure 10. TEM image of CNT, SiO2 nanocomposite mixture [reproduced CNT/Fe3O4 Improved electrical 78
from reference 74 with the kind permission of the authors, Elsevier]. conductivity
Table 13. Hardness values (GPa) of the ingot and ribbon samples prepared
from the Fe/Fe23C6/Fe3B nanocomposite [reproduced from reference 122 with
the permission of the Authors and Elsevier].
Sample Ingot Ribbon
As-solidified 10.3 11.0
600 °C 8.0 11.0
ls. 650 °C - 15.6
1 Mm 100 nm
(a) (b)
700 °C 6.6 16.2
750 °C - 12.2
Figure 11. SEM micrographs of Al2O3/CNT materials: a) at low magnifica-
tion, and b) at high magnification [reproduced from reference 76 with the 800 °C 6.5 12.0
kind permission of the authors, Elsevier]. 850 °C - 10.5
as - Materials Research
nanocomposite. The three iron-containing phases are homogeneously 14
Roman), tamanho 8.
distributed over the entire material122.
as com 0.5 de Stroke.
In the case of Al/SiC nanocomposites (Figure 15), only two 12
ntes a "Dadosphases arecom
gráficos" visible
0.6 deinStroke.
the TEM images: SiC (granular fine grains) and Tiwari et al.
Al (overall
ver rosa do ventos matrix).
na imagem No substituir
original, more sharppelaring-spot
padrão dapatterns have appeared
paleta symbols. 10
in the electron diffraction pattern (SAED),
de barras com 10% de preto quando houver texto e 50% quando não. indicating the formation of
fine, nanosized powders 147
containing the brittle SiC phase embedded
Wear volume
ou figura devem estar todos em Inglês. 8
in the ductile Al matrix.
m estar dentro de caixas de texto com 2 mm de distância nas extremidades.
Other metal-ceramic nanocomposites are shown in the SEM and
ou gráfico deve estar em "Sentence case". 6
TEM photographs of Figure 16. Figure 16a is a SEM micrograph of Fe/
s deverá ter 1 ponto
MgO de Stroke. heat treated at 873 K and reduced at 1073 K11. Volume
composite
changes
s, seguir padrão corretooccurred dueestilo
(respeitando to O2deatoms
escala,released
posição from Fe2O3caixa
dos dados, during reduc- 4 Present study
e inferior da imagem, fundo16b,
tion. Figure preto).
c presents TEM micrographs of uniformly distributed
sentam figurasnanosize ceramic
ex: (a), devem particles
estar in Al and
centralizadas Ag metal
na parte matrices
inferior 95,96
da imagem. respectively. 2
Nearly spherical particles of Ag isolated from each other can be seen in
Figure 16c. This study revealed that Ag particles of size smaller than
0
pore size (10 nm) are size-defined and stabilized. Similar observations 0 10 20 30 40 50 60
have been made with other noble metals such as Au and Pd. Load (N)
In the case of Al-Pb nanocomposites, micrographs showing the Figure 13. Wear loss of nanosized vs. microsized leaded Al alloys [reproduced
worn surfaces (not shown here) revealed delamination in the early from reference 78 with the kind permission of the authors, the American
Table 14. Properties of Al/SiC nano- and microcomposites145-147.

Properties / Material
as - Materials Research Al/SiC Al/SiC
composite nanocomposite
Roman), tamanho 8. Fe3B
Young’s modulus (GPa) 88.4 100
as com 0.5 de Stroke.
Hardness (H ) (Kg/mm2) 78 160
ntes a "Dados gráficos" com v0.6 de Stroke.
ver rosa do ventos na imagem original, substituir pela padrão da paleta symbols.
Fe23C6
de barras com 10% de 3.0preto quando houver texto e 50% quando não.
ou figura devem estar todosSiC
em Inglês.
Al100-x composites
3 100 nm
m estar dentro de caixas de texto com 2 mm de distância nas extremidades.
ou gráfico deve estar2.5 200 nm A-Fe
Vickers hardness (GPa)
em "Sentence case".
Figure 14. TEM images, corresponding SAED for the nanocomposite α-Fe/
s deverá ter 1 ponto de Stroke.
Fe23C6/Fe3B ribbons heat-treated at 850 °C [reproduced from reference 122
s, seguir padrão correto (respeitando estilo de escala, posição dos dados, caixa with the kind permission of the authors, Elsevier].
2.0fundo preto).
e inferior da imagem,
sentam figuras ex: (a), devem estar centralizadas na parte inferior da imagem. (b) Al
e de Figuras - Materials Research matrix
1.5
Times (Roman), tamanho 8.
io" - linhas com 0.5 de Stroke.
1.0 gráficos" com 0.6 de Stroke.
pertencentes a "Dados
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
e que houver rosa do ventos na imagem original, substituir
SiC content, pela%)
x (vol. padrão da paleta symbols.
himento de barras com 10% de preto quando houver texto e 50% quando não.
na tabela ou figura110
devem estar todos em Inglês. 60
SiC
das devem estar dentro de caixas de texto com 2 mm
SiC3 Al100-x composites de distância nas extremidades.
da figura ou gráfico105
deve estar em "Sentence case".
Young’s modulus (GPa)
55
de mapas deverá ter 1 ponto de Stroke.
100
Shear modulus (GPa)
crografias, seguir padrão correto (respeitando estilo de escala, posição dos dados, caixa
95imagem, fundo preto).
o na parte inferior da 50
que representam figuras ex: (a), devem estar centralizadas na parte inferior da imagem.
90
45
85
Young’s modulus 40
80
Shear modulus
75 35
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
SiC content, x (vol. %) (a) 20 nm
Figure 12. Correlation between SiC content, x, Vicker’s hardness, Young’s Figure 15. a) TEM image, b) the corresponding SAED of mechanically solid
modulus, shear modulus of consolidated Al100-x/SiCx nanocomposites [repro- state mixed Al/SiC nanocomposite [reproduced from reference 147 with the
duced from reference 147 with the kind permission of the author, Elsevier]. kind permission of the author, Elsevier].
stage of wear, while the behaviour at late stages was affected by the tivities of all composites decreased linearly, as in the case of metals,
processing technique. In addition, some elongation of particles was also with an abrupt drop of about 90%. The mechanism of these changes
observed, along with coarsening of Pb particles during sliding, due to is yet to be understood.
dislocation-aided diffusion. On the other hand, compression testing of these Al-CNT com-
posites139 showed identical stress strain curves for both the composite
3.2.2. Metal matrix-CNT composites without the precursor and pure Al, except for large elastic strain, while
Let us now look into the CNT-containing metal matrix nanocom- those with the precursor, though similar in shape, exhibited increased
posites. Electrical properties of an Al/CNT system measured between compression stresses. At a higher MWCNT loading (1.6 vol. %),
4.2 K and room temperature revealed an increase from 4.9 to 6.6 μΩ cm proof stress increased seven fold, in contrast to a not so remarkable
at room temperature for 1 and 4 wt. (%) CNTs, but a decrease to improvement in polymer-CNT composites196,197. Fractographs of the
5.5 μΩ cm for 10 wt. (%) CNT (Figure 17), compared to the value of composite revealed no MWCNT aggregates, but instead their uniform
3.4 μΩ cm for the Al matrix. At lower temperatures [70-80 K], resis- distribution without any pullouts. The enhanced mechanical property
has been attributed to the confinement of the Al matrix by the MWC-
NTs on nanoscale.
Internal friction measurements on Mg-based nanocomposites as a
function of temperature up to 500 K revealed almost identical spectra
Al
for both the composites [Al-Saffil covered with CNT and Al-Saffil-
500 nm Al + AIN
CNTs] with thermal hysteresis141. A maximum damping was observed
at about 300 K for 1 Hz frequency, associated with the maximum shear
1 Mm 200 nm 40 nm
modulus for both the composites. On the other hand, larger hysteresis
(a) (b) (c)
ls. and rapid increase of internal friction - reaching a maximum at 350 K
Figure 16. TEM micrographs of a) Fe/MgO; b) Al/AlN and c) Ag/SiO2 na- - was observed for the third composite [Mg 1 vol. % CNT]. However,
nocomposites [reproduced from references 11, 95, 96 respectively, with the
shear modulus decreased for all three composites, being about 20%
kind permission of the authors, Elsevier].
higher for Mg-Saffil-CNT than that for Mg-Saffil. SEM fractographic
studies showed an Mg matrix embedded with CNTs and covering of
5 saffil fibres with CNTs.
Electrical resistivity, 10 6 Ω.cm 1
In the case of Sn2Sb/CNT nanocomposites, higher specific capacity

4
than that shown by CNTs and improved cyclability relative to unsup-
ported Sn–Sb alloy particles were observed. This behaviour was attrib-
3
uted to the high dispersion of Sn2Sb in the CNT matrix. SEM and TEM
2
examinations confirmed136 the presence of nanometric Sn2Sb particles
ta symbols.
homogeneously dispersed in the CNTs (Figure 18).
1
In the case of Al/CNT nanocomposites (Figure 19), a single car-
bon nanotube is seen to be embedded in the Al matrix (Figure 19b)138.
ades.
0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
(a)
gurascaixa
dos, - Materials Research 7
6
(Roman), tamanho 8.
Resistivity, 10 6 Ω.cm 1
imagem. 5
centes a "Dados gráficos" com4 0.6 de Stroke.
3 original, substituir pela padrão da paleta symbols.
ouver rosa do ventos na imagem
o de barras com 10% de preto2 quando houver texto e 50% quando não.
ela ou figura devem estar todos
1 em Inglês. 15 kV x30.000 700 nm 15 15 SEI 30 nm
em estar dentro de caixas de texto com 2 mm de distância nas extremidades. (a) (b)
0 Figure 18. a) SEM, and b) TEM images of Sn2Sb/CNTs nanocomposites
ra ou gráfico deve estar em "Sentence
0 case". 100
50 150 200 250 300
pas deverá ter 1 ponto de Stroke. (b) [reproduced from reference 136 with the kind permission of the authors,
Elsevier].
fias, seguir padrão correto (respeitando
6 estilo de escala, posição dos dados, caixa
arte inferior da imagem, fundo 5 preto).
Resistivity, 10 6 Ω.cm 1
presentam figuras ex: (a), devem estar centralizadas na parte inferior da imagem. 250 nm (a) (b)
guras - Materials Research 4
(Roman), tamanho 8. 3
nhas com 0.5 de Stroke. 2
1
o de barras com 10% de preto0 quando houver texto e 50% quando não.
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
ela ou figura devem estar todos em Inglês. (c)
em estar dentro de caixas de texto com 2 mm de distância nas
Temperature (K)extremidades.
ra ou gráfico deve estar 17.
Figure em Dependence
"Sentence case".
of electrical resistivity in Al/CNT composites with tem- 143002 20.0 kV x35.0 k 514 nm
pas deverá ter 1 ponto de a)
perature: Stroke.
Al/CNT 1 wt. (%), b) Al/CNT 4 wt. (%), and c) Al/CNT 10 wt. (%) [re- Figure 19. a) TEM images of CNTs, and b) SEM image of Al/CNT 1 wt. (%) [re-
fias, seguir padrão corretofrom
produced referenceestilo
(respeitando 138 with the kindposição
de escala, permission of the acaixa
dos dados, uthors, Elsevier]. produced from reference 138 with the kind permission of the authors, Elsevier].
Furthermore, agglomerates of carbon nanotubes can be found at the

grain
guras - Materials boundaries of the aluminium matrix.
Research
1.0
Fracture toughness (MPa-m1/2)

3.3. Polymer
s (Roman), tamanho 8. matrix nanocomposites
0.9
inhas com 0.5 de Stroke.
Structure-property correlations in polymer nanocomposites have
ncentes a "Dadosbeengráficos" com 0.6
extensively de Stroke.
dealt with in a recent book292, which describes the 0.8
houver rosa domechanical properties
ventos na imagem of polymers
original, based
substituir pela on nanostructure
padrão and mor-
da paleta symbols.
phology. Table 0.7
to de barras com 10% de preto15 presents
quando examples
houver of these
texto e 50% properties.
quando não.
ela ou figura devem
3.3.1.estar todos em
Polymer Inglês.- discontinuous reinforcement
matrix 0.6
vem estar dentro de caixas de texto com
(non-layered) nanocomposites2 mm de distância nas extremidades.
0.5
The de
apas deverá ter 1 ponto reinforcing
Stroke. materials employed in the production of polymer 0.4
nanocomposites can be classified according to their dimensions* . For 18
1 0 1 2 3 4
afias, seguir padrão correto (respeitando estilo de escala, posição dos dados, caixa
example, when the three dimensions are in the nanometre scale, they are vol. (%) TiO2
parte inferior da imagem, fundo preto).
called isodimensional nanoparticles. Examples include spherical silica,
presentam figuras
metalex:particles
(a), devem
andestar centralizadasnanoclusters
semiconductor na parte inferior
219 da imagem.
. The second kind of Figure 20. Variation of quasi-static fracture toughness as a function of
reinforcement is formed by nanotubes or whiskers, which contain two volume fraction of TiO2 nanoparticles in the polyester/TiO2 nanocomposite
dimensions in the nanometre scale and one larger, forming an elongated [reproduced from reference 180 with the kind permission of the authors,
structure. Carbon nanotubes and cellulose whiskers, extensively studied Elsevier].
as reinforcing nanofillers, can be included in this second category. The
third type of reinforcement is characterized by only one dimension in
the nanometre range220-222. In this group, the filler contains sheets one to
a few nanometres thick and hundreds to thousands nanometres long. This
as - Materials Research
family is called polymer-layered nanocomposites2,18,26. These materials
Roman), tamanho are 8.
obtained by intercalation of the polymer (or a monomer subsequently
polymerized)
as com 0.5 de Stroke. inside the galleries of the layered host. Many synthetic and
natural crystalline hosts that are able, under specific conditions, to inter-
ntes a "Dados gráficos" com 0.6 de Stroke.
calate a polymer have been described. Examples include graphite, metal
ver rosa do ventos na imagem original, substituir pela padrão da paleta symbols. 1000 nm 1000 nm
chalcogenides (MoS2, for example), clays, layered silicate (montmo-
de barras com rillonite,
10% de preto quandosaponite,
hectorite, houver texto e 50% quando
fluoromica, não.
fluorohectorite, vermiculite (a) (b)
ou figura devem
andestar todos em
kaolinite) andInglês.
layered double hydroxides. Nanocomposites based
on caixas
m estar dentro de clay and layered
de texto comsilicates
2 mm dehave beennas
distância widely investigated due to the
extremidades.
ou gráfico deveavailability of clay starting
estar em "Sentence case". materials and their well-known intercalation
chemistry
s deverá ter 1 ponto as mentioned earlier18,50,51,223.
de Stroke.
Figure 20 shows the variation in quasi-static fracture toughness
s, seguir padrão correto (respeitando estilo de escala, posição dos dados, caixa
as a function of the volume percentage of TiO2 in the polyester/TiO2
e inferior da imagem, fundo preto).
nanocomposite. The addition of TiO2 particles has a great effect on 1000 nm 1000 nm
sentam figuras ex: (a), devem estar centralizadas na parte inferior da imagem. (c) (d)
fracture toughness. At loadings of 1, 2 and 3 vol. %, an increase of
57, 42 and 41%, respectively, can be observed, when compared with
that of the original polyester. However, at 4 vol. % TiO2, toughness Figure 21. TEM micrographs depicting the level of TiO2 nanoparticle dispersion
(0.55 MPam1/2) decreased approximately to the value given by the within the polyester matrix in the polyester/TiO2 nanocomposite. Volume frac-
polyester matrix (0.54 MPam1/2).This variation can be explained in tion of particles: a) 1 vol. %; b) 2 vol. %; c) 3 vol. %; and d) 4 vol. % [reproduced
terms of nanocomposite structure, as illustrated in Figure 21. from reference 180 with the kind permission of the authors, Elsevier].
Table 15. Examples of polymer-matrix nanocomposites and their properties18,25,26,180,184.

Matrix/reinforcement Properties
Polypropylene/montmorillonite Improved tensile strength, strain at break, stiffness, Young’s modulus and tensile stress
Nylon-6/Layered-silicates Improved storage modulus, tensile modulus, HDT, tensile stress and reduced flammability.
Polylactide/Layered-silicates Improved bending modulus, bending strength, distortion at break, storage modulus, gas barrier
properties and biodegradability.
Epoxy/Layered-silicates Improved tensile strength and modulus.
Polyimide/montmorillonite Improved tensile strength, elongation at break and gas barrier properties.
Polystyrene/Layered-silicates Improved tensile stress and reduced flammability.
Polyethylene oxide/Layered-silicates Improved ionic conductivity.
Poly(methyl methacrylate)/Pd Improved thermal stability.
Polyester/TiO2 Improved fracture toughness and tensile strength.
Epoxy/SiC Improved microhardness, storage modulus and elastic modulii.
∗In the majority of publications on clay and layered compounds [e.g. R. Schöllhorn, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 19 (1980) 983], layered structures are classified
as two-dimensional (grown preferentially in two dimensions). This is opposite to the usual interpretation given by polymer nanocomposite scientists, who consider
the number of nanodimensions of the reinforcing agents to classify them. In the case of layered structures, they are in the nanorange in only one dimension, though
they may possess three dimensions and hence the material is termed as ‘one-dimensional’. On the same line, nanoparticles and nanotubes, which have three and two
nanorange dimensions respectively, are classified as isodimensional and two-dimensional respectively. Following the majority of the papers dealing with polymer
nanocomposites, which use the nomenclature adopting the number of nanorange dimensions, the same terminology will be followed throughout this paper.
It can be observed that the specimens containing 1, 2 and 3 vol. % showing discrete domains of an inorganic phase with narrow particle
TiO2 show excellent particle dispersion. Conversely, considerable ag- size distribution (10-20 nm)224. This composite showed better thermal
glomeration was present in the specimens containing 4 vol. % TiO2. stability with higher Tg (527 K-254 °C) compared to 458 K (185 °C)
Authors have assigned the initial increase in fracture toughness, fol- for the N-butyl-substituted polymaleimides, and a higher decomposi-
lowed by the precipitous decline observed at 4 vol. %, to the level of tion temperature of 834 K (561 °C) compared to N-alkyl-substituted
dispersion of nanoparticles within the matrix and to the weak bonding polymaleimides.
between the titania particles and the polyester180. Most of the properties observed in polymers-discontinuous rein-
The structure of polymer nanocomposites reinforced with isodi- forcement systems are directly related to their structure. For example,
mensional particles is similar to that of ceramic and metal nanocompos- PSM/CdSe nanocomposite (PSM = poly (styrene-alt-maleic anhydride)
ites. In this type, the reinforcement material is distributed all over the showed an emission peak at 540 nm in its photoluminescence spectrum,
polymer matrix, as illustrated in Figure 22. The microstructure of some which was close to the absorption edge of the obtained CdSe particles225.
particle-reinforced polymer nanocomposites is shown in Figure 23. According to the authors, this type of near band edge emission is typi-
Figure 23a shows the TEM micrograph of polyacrylic acid/silver cal of surface-passivated nanocrystalline CdSe. For nanoparticles, a
nanocomposite, showing spherical Ag particles of 10-80 nm size183. large percentage of defects are located at the surface. If these defects
Secondary aggregates are formed due to the low viscosity nature of are not passivated, non-radiative recombination will occur, as they act
the composite solution. Figure 23b shows the TEM micrograph of an as traps for electron and hole annihilation. Therefore, it is conceivable
oxidised poly (4-vinylpyridine) homopolymer-Fe2O3 nanocomposite that PSM modified the surface structure and enhanced the lumines-
showing ultrafine and crystalline spherical particles of the dispersoids cence properties of CdSe nanoparticles225. As can be seen from TEM
in the 20-200 nm range223. In this case, the particles retain the nanosize images of this material (Figure 24), CdSe nanoparticles are uniform
dimension due to the protective action of the polymer layer. and monodisperse, with an average size of about 17 nm. In this case,
SEM analyses of PET-uncoated CaCO 3 nanocomposites it is feasible that PSM played an important role in controlling the size
(Figure 23c) show large particles which seem to be quite welded to and the monodispersion of the nanoparticles225. Interactions between
PET181. On coating, these particles get even larger, but again are well PSM and CdSe particles were also investigated and are supported by
welded. Figure 23d, on its turn, is a field emission SEM of transpar- IR and UV-visible spectroscopy.
ent polymaleimide-27.4 wt. (%) silica nanocomposite without any In the PVA/Ag nanocomposite system, a strong influence of the Ag
addition of colloidal silica, synthesised by the sol-gel process and nanofiller (~20 nm) was observed on the material strength and thermal
properties, even at low concentration (<1 wt. (%))178. For example, the
glass transition was shifted towards higher temperatures by 20 K and
the thermal stability was improved by about 40 K in the case of the
Reinforcing material nanocomposite containing 0.73 wt. (%) Ag. Also, nanocomposite films
Polymer chains showed deformation behaviour characteristic of semicrystalline materi-
als, with a clearly distinguished yield point, while no yield point was
observed in the deformation of the pure PVA matrix. These changes in
the thermal and mechanical behaviour of PVA in the presence of the
ls. Ag nanofiller were discussed in terms of polymer chains attached to
the surface of Ag nanoparticles. The improved thermal stability was
explained on the basis of the reduced mobility of the PVA chains in
the nanocomposite. In this system, a strong influence of nanoparticles
Figure 22. Typical structure of particle-reinforced polymer nanocompos- on the material strength was also observed. The stress at break of the
ites. nanocomposite film with 0.33 wt. (%) of silver was almost 100% higher
than the corresponding value for the pure matrix. Finally, the strain at
break slightly decreased with increasing nanoparticle content178.
From the phase contrast AFM of poly-para-xylylene composites
containing Pd or Sn nanoparticles (Figure 25a-c), prepared by vacuum
co-condensation of both the metal and the polymer47, one can identify
surface imperfections as well as metal particle sizes (7-10 nm). Surface
morphology seemed to depend on the type of metal, with good surface
uniformity for Pd. In the Pd case, particles were identified as an inor-
500 nm 100 nm
(a) (b)
(Roman), tamanho 8.
o de barras com Acc.V
10% deSpotpreto quando houver texto e 50% quando não.
Magn WD 500 nm
ela ou figura devem30.0estar
kV 2.0todos em Inglês.
50000x 6.1 CNR IRT eMR 1-0001 10.0kV x40.0k 450 nm
em estar dentro de caixas de texto com (c) 2 mm de distância nas extremidades. (d)
Figure 500 nm 200 nm
ra ou gráfico deve estar 23.
em TEM photograph
"Sentence case". of a) PAA/Ag; b) PVP/Fe2O3; c) PET/CaCO3, and
d) PMI/SiO nanocomposites. ��
PAA = polyacrylic acid, PVP = 4-polyvinylpy- (a) (b)
pas deverá ter 1 ponto de Stroke.2
ridine, PET = poly(ethylene terephthalate), PMI = polymaleimide [reproduced Figure 24. TEM images of the PSM/CdSe nanocomposite (PSM =
fias, seguir padrão
fromcorreto (respeitando
references 183, 223,estilo
181,de224
escala, posição dos
respectively, withdados, caixa
the kind permission of poly(styrene-alt-maleic anhydride) [reproduced from reference 225 with the
arte inferior da imagem, fundo
the authors, preto).Springer Science, Business Media].
Elsevier, kind permission of the authors, Elsevier].
nA
nA
A-Z
nM nM
140 140
120 120
100 100
80 80 140
140 60 120
60 120 100
100 40 80
40 60
80 20 40
20 60
40 0 0 20
0 20
0
(a) (b) (c)
Figure 25. a) Phase-contrast AFM image of poly-para-xylylene/Pd nanocomposite. Dark regions are polymer spherulites; light spots are Pd nanoparticles situ-
ated at the boundary between polymer spherulites; b) AFM phase contrast image of poly-para-xylylene/Sn 8 vol. % nanocomposite; and c) AFM phase contrast
image of the poly-para-xylylene/Sn 16 vol. % nanocomposite [reproduced from reference 47 with the kind permission of the authors, Elsevier].
ganic phase with spherical globules of ~200 nm size. In the case of tin, secondary, tertiary and quaternary alkylammonium or alkylphospho-
separated Sn particles localized on polymer spherulites (Figure 25b) nium. In organosilicates, these alkylammonium or alkylphosphonium
and aggregates of Sn nanoparticles connected in continuous chains are cations lower the surface energy of the inorganic host and improve
evident. The ionic conductivity of these nanocomposites is reported to the wetting characteristics of the polymer matrix, resulting in a larger
have improved when compared with that of the pure polymer. interlayer spacing. Moreover, these cations provide functional groups
that can react with the polymer matrix or initiate the polymerization of
3.3.2. Polymer nanocomposites with layered reinforcements monomers to improve the strength of the interface between the inorganic
Polymer layered silicate (PLS) nanocomposites have attracted component and the polymer matrix50,245,248,249.
great interest due to their improved properties compared with the pure Montmorillonite, hectorite and saponite are the most commonly
polymer and conventional micro and macrocomposites. Some of these used layered silicates. Their structure is presented in Figure 26 and their
improvements include high moduli, increased strength and heat resist- formulae in Table 16235. When the hydrated cations are ion-exchanged
ance, decreased flammability and gas permeability and increased biode with bulkier organic cations, a larger interlayer spacing is usually
gradability1,158,166,207,210,211,235-243. Two particular characteristics of layered obtained (Figure 26).
silicates are generally considered for PLS nanocomposites. The first The main reason for the remarkable improvements observed in
is the ability of the silicate particles to disperse into individual layers polymer/layered-silicate nanocomposites is the stronger interfacial in-
(totally delaminated or exfoliated). The second is the ability to fine-tune teraction between the matrix and the silicate, compared to conventional
their surface chemistry through ion exchange reactions with organic filler-reinforced systems. Some examples will be given below in order
and inorganic cations. These two are, of course, interrelated, since the to illustrate this statement.
degree of dispersion of a layered silicate in a particular polymer matrix The incorporation of MMT (montmorillonite) into a Nylon-6 matrix
depends on the interlayer ionic species. has led to a significant improvement in its mechanical properties. The
Although the intercalation chemistry of polymers towards layered Young’s modulus (or tensile modulus), for example, of pure Nylon-6
silicates has long been known245,246, the field of PLS nanocomposites (1.11 GPa) was strongly improved when the nanocomposite was
has recently gained impressive attention, due to two important find- formed. The Nylon-6/MMT with a filler content of 4.1 wt. (%) gave a
ings. Firstly, the results obtained on Nylon-6 (N6)/montmorillonite value of 2.25 GPa, which corresponds to an increase of 102.7%208,209.
(MMT) nanocomposites, which showed that a small concentration of Figure 27 represents the dependence of tensile modulus E, at 393 K
layered silicate lead to remarkable changes in thermal and mechanical (120 °C), on clay content for organo-modified montmorillonite- and
properties26. Secondly, the observation by Vaia et al.247 that it is pos- saponite-based nanocomposites208. Results clearly show that the in-
sible to melt-mix polymers with layered silicates, without the use of crease in Young’s modulus in these systems is related to the average
organic solvents. length of the layers and, consequently, to the aspect ratio of the dispersed
The structural family called the 2:1 phyllosilicates is the most nanoparticles as well as the extent of their exfoliation. Also, regarding
commonly used layered silicate in polymer nanocomposites. Their two- Nylon-6 nanocomposites, a strong interaction between matrix and
dimensional layers are made up of two tetrahedrally coordinated silicon silicate layers occurs via formation of hydrogen bonds.
atoms fused to an edge-shared octahedral sheet of either aluminium or This behaviour can also be supported by maleic anhydride modi-
magnesium hydroxide. The layer thickness is around 1 nm and its lateral fied by propylene (PP-MA)/LS anocomposites. Table 17 represents
dimensions may vary from 300 Å to several micra or larger, depend- the variation of the Young’s modulus as a function of filler and maleic
ing on the nature of the silicate26. Stacking of these layers generates a anhydride contents for both the nano and the microcomposite. These
regular van der Waals gap, which is called the ‘interlayer’ space or the results indicate that the nanocomposite shows higher Young’s modulus
‘gallery’. Isomorphic substitution within the layers produces negative than the pure PP matrix. Also, a significant increase, as compared to
charges that are counterbalanced by alkaline or alkaline earth cations the PP microcomposite, was observed as the amount of MA added to
located in the interlayer. This occurs, for example, when Mg2+ or Fe2+ the polymer matrix was increased250.
replaces Al3+ or when Li+ replaces Mg2+. Because the forces that hold Important improvements on the stress at break were also observed
the stacks together are relatively weak van der Waals interactions, in Polymer/LS systems. In thermoplastic-based nanocomposites, the
the intercalation of small molecules between the layers is simple143. stress at break, which expresses the ultimate strength that the mate-
In some cases, the hydrated interlayer cations can be exchanged by rial can bear before breaking, varies depending on the nature of the
ion-exchange reactions with cationic surfactants including primary, interactions between the matrix and the filler. Table 18 shows some
examples of tensile stress in different nanocomposite systems. Ac-

cording to these results, some important conclusions can be drawn,
as discussed below.
Tetrahedral
Exfoliated Nylon-6 and intercalated PMMA nanocomposites ex-
hibited a great increase in the stress at break251. This can be due to the
Octahedral polar (PMMA) and ionic interactions (Nylon-6 grafted onto the layers)
between the matrix and the silicate layers. This increase is larger in
ols. Tetrahedral Nylon-6 nanocomposites250-252. On the other hand, propylene-based
nanocomposites showed only a slight enhancement in tensile stress,
Exchangeable hydrated which can be explained by the lack of interfacial adhesion between
cations (Li, Na, Rb, Cs) non-polar PP and polar-layered silicates. However, addition of maleic
O anhydride-modified polypropylene to the polypropylene matrix has
confirmed to be effective in the intercalation of the PP chains and the
O, OH
maintenance of the ultimate stress at an acceptable level18. Finally,
Al, Fe, Mg, Li
a regarding PS-intercalated nanocomposites, the ultimate tensile stress
O, OH
is significantly decreased compared to that given by the PP matrix and
. Si, Al drops down at higher filler contents252. The authors have attributed
this finding to the weak interactions at the polystyrene-clay interface.
It is important to note that in previous compositions in which polar
Figure 26. Schematic representation of the structure of 2:1 phyllosilicates.
interactions were developed, strengthening at the filler matrix interface
was observed18.
Table 16. Chemical formulae of 2:1 phyllosilicates [reproduced from refer-

0.8 ence 26 with permission of the authors and Elsevier].
2:1 Phyllosilicate Chemical formula
Montmorillonite Mx(Al4-xMgx)Si8O20(OH)4
0.6 L = 1000 Å
E (120 °C) (GPa)
Hectorite Mx(Mg6-xLix)Si8O20(OH)4
ls.
Saponite MxMg6(Si8-xAlx)O20(OH)4
0.4
“M” Represents exchangeable cations and “x” the degree of isomorphous
L = 500 Å
substitution.
0.2
Table 17. Young’s modulus for PP-MA based micro- and nanocomposites as a
0 function of filler and maleic anhydride contents [reproduced from reference 250
0 2 4 6 8 with permission of the authors and the American Institute of Physics, USA].
Clay content wt. (%)
Sample Filler MA content Young’s
Montmorillonite Saponite Nylon
content (wt. (%)) modulus
L= average length of silicate layers (wt. (%)) (Mpa)
PP 0 0 780
microcomposite 6.9 0 830
Figure 27. Dependence of tensile modulus (E) at 120 °C on clay content nanocomposite 7.2 7.2 838
for organomodified montmorillonite-, saponite-based nanocomposites [re-
produced from reference 208 with the kind permission of the authors, the
nanocomposite 7.2 14.4 964
Materials Research Society]. nanocomposite 7.2 21.6 1010
Table 18. Tensile stress evolution for nanocomposites based on various thermoplastic matrices [reproduced from ref. 18 with permission of the authors and
Elsevier].
Matrix Tensile stress (MPa) Nanofiller content (wt. (%)) Structure Tensile stress (MPa)
Nylon-6 68.6 4.7 Exfoliated 97.2
Nylon-6 68.6 5.3 Exfoliated 97.3
Nylon-6 68.6 4.1 Exfoliated 102
PMMA 53.9 12.6 Intercalated 62.0
PMMA 53.9 20.7 Intercalated 62.0
PP-MA 7.2 wt. (%) 31.4 5.0 Intercalated 29.5
PP-MA 21.6 wt. (%) 32.6 4.8 Intercalated 31.7
PS 28.7 11.3 Intercalated 21.7
Usually, when LS are dispersed in thermoplastics such as PMMA, candidates for the generation of a new family of high performance
PS or PP, the elongation at break is reduced 251,252. The reported decrease materials.
in elongation is from 150% in pure PP matrix, to 105% for a 6.9 wt. (%) Polyimide is another example of a polymer matrix material showing
non-intercalated clay microcomposite. On the other hand, in a nano- an increase in both stress and elongation at break 255. For example, when
composite filled with 5 wt. (%) silicate layers, the more pronounced filled with montmorillonite exchanged with hexadecylammonium, these
drop was 7.5%. Conversely, this loss in ultimate elongation did not properties increase with the filler loading at least up to 5 wt. (%). At
occur in elastomeric epoxy or polyol polyurethane matrices253,254. In higher filler contents, both properties drop towards values lower than
these cases, introduction of the nanoclay in cross-linked matrices causes those described for the filler-free matrix due to the formation of non-
an increase of the elongation at break. This is shown in Figure 28 for exfoliated aggregates which make these composites more brittle.
epoxy nanocomposites, which are prepared from magadiite modified Another nanocomposite system studied in great detail is Nylon-6/
with methyl-octadecylammonium or trimethyloctadecylammonium ions protonated aminododecanoic acid, which has been studied for its impact
and a conventional composite prepared from magadiite modified with resistance properties. The nanocomposite synthesized by in situ interca-
octadecylammonium254. While a drop in the elongation at break can be lative polymerization had its Izod impact strength reduced from 20.6 to
observed for the conventional composite, a slight improvement in this 18.1 J/m compared with the pure matrix when 4.7 wt. (%) of nanoclay
property can be observed for the intercalated nanocomposite. was incorporated. Charpy impact testing showed a similar reduction
Finally, exfoliated nanocomposites display a large increase in the from 6.21 kJ/m2 to 6.06 kJ/m2 for the 4.7 wt. (%) nanocomposite52,256.
elongation at break. This is probably due to the plasticizing effect of Table 21 presents the effect of MMT content and Nylon-6 molecular
the galleries, their contribution to the formation of dangling chains and weight on the tensile modulus of MMT modified with (HE)2M1R1† 257.
conformational effects at the clay-matrix interface. The combination of A substantial improvement in stiffness can be seen, which increases
improved stiffness (Young’s modulus), toughness (stress at break) and with increasing matrix molecular weight (at any given concentration)
elasticity (strain at break) makes elastomeric nanocomposites suitable for all Nylon-6 nanocomposites, i.e., low (LMW), medium (MMW) and
high molecular weights (HMW). A slightly larger modulus of 2.82 GPa
for LMW may be the result of a higher degree of crystallinity giving
faster crystallization kinetics during the cooling of the specimen after
60 injection moulding. Yield strength, on its turn, increases with the con-
tent of MMT, but while the HMW- and MMW-based nanocomposites
50 show a steady increase in strength with the increasing content of clay,
Epoxy/Magadiite exfoliated the LMW-based nanocomposites show a less pronounced effect. Also,
Strain break (%)
40 increase in strength relative to the virgin matrix for the HMW composite
. is nearly twice that of the LMW composite at the highest clay content.
30 Regarding the elongation at break for two different rates of extension,
Epoxy/Magadiite intercalated
results show that the pure matrix is very ductile at a test rate of 0.51 cm/
20 min. Increasing clay content leads to a gradual decrease in ductility.
The elongation at break for the LMW-based nanocomposites decreases
10 Epoxy/Magadiite conventional rapidly at low MMT content (around 1 wt. (%)). This larger reduction in
the LMW-based systems may be due to the presence of stacked silicate
0 layers, as seen in Figure 29257. The higher testing rate of 5.1 cm/min
0 5 10 15 yields similar trends, but the absolute level of the elongation at break is
Magadiite loading (wt. (%) SiO2) significantly lower. The strain decreases for all nanocomposites when
compared to the pure matrix polymer.
Figure 28. Strain at break values for exfoliated, intercalated epoxy/magadiite This good resistance to impact, high Young’s modulus, good
nanocomposites [reproduced from reference 254 with the kind permission of flexural modulus and a notable enhancement in the heat distortion
the authors, the American Chemical Society, USA]. temperature, going from 338 K (65 °C) for pure Nylon-6 to more than
Table 19. Mechanical properties of some N6/(HE)2M1R1 nanocomposites [reproduced from ref. 257 with permission of the authors and Elsevier].
N6/(HE)2M1R1 Modulus Yield strength Strain (%) Elongation at break (%) Izod impact
(GPa) (MPa) Crosshead speed strength (J/m)
0.51 cm/min 5.1 cm/min
LMW
0.0 wt. (%) MMT 2.82 69.2 4.0 232 28 36.0
3.2 wt. (%) MMT 3.65 78.9 3.5 12 11 32.3
6.4 wt. (%) MMT 4.92 83.6 2.2 2.4 4.8 32.0
MMW
0.0 wt. (%) MMT 2.71 70.2 4.0 269 101 39.3
3.1 wt. (%) MMT 3.66 86.6 3.5 81 18 38.3
7.1 wt. (%) MMT 5.61 95.2 2.4 2.5 5 39.3
HMW
0.0 wt. (%) MMT 2.75 69.7 4.0 3.4 129 43.9
3.2 wt. (%) MMT 3.92 84.9 3.3 119 27 44.7
7.2 wt. (%) MMT 5.70 97.6 2.6 4.1 6.1 46.2
The substituents on the quaternary ammonium compound used to form the organoclay are identified in this shorthand notation where R = rapeseed, HE = hydroxyethyl,
†
M = methyl. Rapeseed is a natural product composed predominantly of unsaturated C22 alkyl chains (45%)257.
423 K (150 °C) for the nanocomposite, have allowed this material to This figure compares the values of the storage moduli for two sets of
replace glass fibre-reinforced nylon or polypropylene in the production samples in which the reinforcement content varied from 0 to 30 wt. (%).
of timing belt covers of automotive engines258. Values were recorded for nanocomposites filled with organomodified
Coming to dynamic strength properties, it is well known that dy- clay and for composites prepared by melt-blending the SBS matrix
namic mechanical analysis (DMA) measures the response of a given and Na-montmorillonite under the same conditions. There is a sharp
material to a cyclic deformation (usually tension or three-point flexion increase in elastic modulus for nanocomposites, while microcomposites
type deformation) as a function of temperature. Results are expressed do not present any improvement in this property.
by three main parameters, which are the storage modulus (E’), cor- DMA properties were also studied for the widely used bifunctional
responding to elastic response to deformation; the loss modulus (E”), diglycidyl ether of bisphenol-A (DGEBA) containing different amounts
corresponding to plastic response to deformation and tan δ, that is the (2-10 wt. (%)) of layered silicate, and prepared by a two steps chemical
(E’/E”) ratio, useful for determining the glass transition temperature, method (173 to 323 K and from 323 to 573 K). Results indicated that,
for example. PS nanocomposites have been characterized by DMA with increasing organic clay content in the composite, the relaxation
analysis252. No significant difference in E’ was observed between temperatures of the cured system decreased, while the presence of
the pure PS and a nanocomposite intercalated with 17.2 wt. (%) of modified layered silicate improved both toughness and stiffness of
Na-montmorillonite in the temperature range of 293-413 K (20-140 °C), the matrix260. AFM phase contrast images (Figure 31) show stacked
indicating lack of influence of intercalated nanocomposites on the layers of silicates in the product, even though they are not distributed
elastic properties of the matrix. However, shift and broadening of tan δ homogeneously throughout the material. The high magnification shown
values towards higher temperatures for the nanocomposite suggests an in Figure 31(b) reveals the striated structure in the 5 wt. (%) layered
increase in the glass transition temperature and some broadening of this silicate-containing nanocomposite, with increasing phase intervals at
transition. This can be assigned to restricted segmental motions at the the top of the surface. However, no individual layers could be seen
organic-inorganic interface of the intercalated systems. by TEM.
However, a different behaviour on DMA properties is observed The dependence of the storage modulus for polyimide-based
when blending copolymers, such as the symmetric styrene-butadiene- nanocomposites filled with 2 wt. (%) of organic clays and for the
styrene [SBS] block copolymers, are previously used to modify the unfilled matrix is shown in Figure 32. At any temperature, higher stor-
matrix259. For example, when SBS is melt-blended with a montmorillo- age moduli result from the better nanofiller dispersion. Moreover, the
nite modified by dimethyldioctadecylammonium, a nanocomposite in large difference between exfoliated montmorillonite- and exfoliated
which only the PS blocks can intercalate within the layered silicates is mica-based nanocomposites can be explained by the respective aspect
produced. In this material, a large improvement of the storage modulus
at 25 °C was observed. Figure 30 shows these results for this nano- and
its microcomposite counterpart259.
(a) 600
400
s (Roman), tamanho 8.
inhas com 0.5 de Stroke.
ncentes a "Dados gráficos" com 0.6 de Stroke. 200
houver rosa do ventos na imagem original, substituir pela padrão da paleta symbols.
100 nm
to de barras com 10% de preto quando houver texto e 50%100 nm não.
quando 100 nm
(a) (b) (c) 0
0 3.31 0 200 400 600
ls.
Figure 29. Bright field TEM images of melt compounded nanocomposites MM .M
vem estar dentrocontaining
de caixas de
3 texto comMMT
wt. (%) 2 mmbased
de distância nas extremidades.
on a) HMW, b) MMW, and c) LMW
ura ou gráfico deve estar em "Sentence case".
Nylon-6 [reproduced from reference 257 with the kind permission of the Figure 31. Phase contrast AFM images of DETDA (diethyltoluenediamine)-
cured DGEBA (diglycidylether of bisphenol) containing 5 wt. (%) organoclay
apas deverá ter 1 authors,
ponto deElsevier].
Stroke.
[reproduced from reference 260 with the kind permission of the authors,
afias, seguir padrão correto (respeitando estilo de escala, posição dos dados, caixa Elsevier].
parte inferior da imagem, fundo preto).
108 estar centralizadas na parte inferior da imagem.
presentam figuras ex: (a), devem
8
6 3.0
Storage elastic modulus (GPa)
4 2.5
Nanocomposite
2 2.0
bols.
E’ (Pa)
107 1.5 Synthetic mica

8
6
1.0 Montmorillonite
Saponite
4
0.5 Hectorite
Microcomposite no Clay
2
xa 0.0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 400
106 Temperature (°C)
m. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Clay wt. (%)
Figure 30. Trend of the Storage Modulus (E’) at 531 K for SBS-based na- Figure 32. Temperature dependence of storage elastic modulus for polyimide-
nocomposites, microcomposites as a function of the filler level [reproduced based nanocomposites filled with 2 wt. (%) of organomodified synthetic mica,
from reference 259 with the kind permission of the authors, the Materials montmorillonite, saponite, hectorite [reproduced from reference 255 with the
Research Society, USA]. kind permission of the authors, John Wiley & Sons Inc.]
ratio of the dispersed silicate layers, with lengths of 0.218 and 1.23 mm nanocomposite. Figure 33 shows TEM images of intercalated and
for montmorillonite and synthetic mica respectively, as observed by exfoliated polymer-layered silicates nanocomposites26.
TEM studies. Let us now look at other physical properties such as thermal sta-
From Figure 32, it is also evident that the glass transition tem- bility, ionic conductivity gas barrier, flame retardancy, etc., of layered
perature decreases (~288 K) with increasing clay content for this nanocomposites. Polymer/LS nanocomposites show improvements in
nanocomposite. The influence of dispersion and length of the layered their thermal stability. The PMMA/montmorillonite 10 wt. (%) nano-
particles has thus been demonstrated in the case of these nanocompos- composite, for example, degraded at temperatures 40 ± 5 °C is superior
ites using various organoclays (hectorite, saponite, montmorillonite to pure PMMA246. In the poly (dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS)/10 wt. (%)
and synthetic mica)210,255. Mica and montmorillonite clays lead to organomontorillonite nanocomposite, a dramatic shift in the weight
exfoliated-structures, while a partially exfoliated-intercalated structure loss towards higher temperatures was recorded261. These improvements
was obtained for saponite and a mainly intercalated morphology was were due to the decrease in permeability, usually observed in exfoliated
attributed to the hectorite-based nanocomposite. nanocomposites, which hinders the diffusion of volatile decomposition
Furthermore, DMA studies carried out on organoclays exfoliated products. In this context, the silicate layers act as a superior insulator
within cross-linked matrices revealed a very noticeable improvement in and mass transport barrier to the volatile products generated during
storage modulus, especially above Tg. For example, the epoxy/montmo- decomposition.
rillonite 4 vol. % nanocomposite below Tg showed a 58% increase164.
Fire relevant properties, such as heat release rate (HRR), peak heat
In this case, a well-ordered exfoliated nanocomposite (silicate layers
release rate (PHRR), smoke production and CO2 yield are vital to the
separated by approximately 100 Å) was formed. At 331 K, E’ equals
evaluation of the fire safety of the material. As a result, the decreased
2.44 and 1.55 GPa for the nanocomposite and the unfilled cross-linked
flammability of nanocomposites is one of their most important features.
matrix, respectively. At 423 K, which is above Tg, the reported E’ values
Table 20 shows cone calorimeter data for three different kinds of poly-
are 11 and 50 MPa for the unfilled and filled epoxy, respectively. This
mers and their respective nanocomposites with MMT. It can be seen that
enhancement corresponds to a storage modulus improvement by a factor
of 4.5. Also, an interesting result could be observed in nitrile rubber/ all MMT-based nanocomposites exhibited reduced flammability. The
organoclay nanocomposites258. A three-fold increase in the storage peak HRR is reduced by 50-75% for N6, PS, and PP-g-MA nanocom-
modulus was described through the simple dispersion/exfoliation of posites243. In general, the flame retardant mechanism of nanocomposites
10 parts of organoclay per 100 parts of rubber, with a modulus as high involves a high-performance carbonaceous-silicate char, which builds
as 8.8 MPa. This value is similar to what can be obtained with the same up on the surface during burning and serves as a barrier to both mass
matrix filled with 40 parts of carbon black per 100 parts of rubber. As a and energy transport. This mechanism has also been supported by
result, the amount of filler can be reduced by a factor of four. Overall, recent studies concerning PS/MMT nanocomposites262. Studies of the
the storage elastic modulus appears to be substantially enhanced at
temperatures above Tg for exfoliated nanocomposites filled with layered
silicates. A possible explanation for such an improvement could be the
as - Materialscreation
Researchof a three-dimensional network of interconnected long silicate
layers, strengthening the material through mechanical percolation.
Roman), tamanho 8.Mechanical properties of layered nanocomposites typically re-
as com 0.5 desemble
Stroke. those of ceramic materials. Flocculated nanocomposites are,
ntes a "Dadosconceptually,
gráficos" com the same
0.6 de as intercalated nanocomposites. Silicate layers
Stroke.
are sometimes flocculated due to hydroxylated edge–edge interaction
ver rosa do ventos na imagem original, substituir pela padrão da paleta symbols.
of the silicate layers, and when they are completely and uniformly 200 nm 200 nm
de barras com 10% de preto quando houver texto e 50% quando não. Intercalated Exfoliated
dispersed in a continuous polymer matrix, an exfoliated or delaminated
ou figura devem estar todos
structure em Inglês.
is obtained. The individual clay layers are separated in a con- (a) (b)
m estar dentro de
tinuous polymer com
caixas de texto 2 mm
matrix by de
andistância
averagenas extremidades.
distance that depends on clay Figure 33. TEM images showing a) intercalated, and b) exfoliated polymer-
ou gráfico develoading.
estar emUsually,
"Sentencethecase".
clay content of an exfoliated nanocomposite is clay nanocomposites [reproduced from 26 with the kind permission of the
muchde
s deverá ter 1 ponto lower (4-5 wt. (%)) than that of an intercalated (11-34 wt. (%))
Stroke. authors, Elsevier].
s, seguir padrão correto (respeitando estilo de escala, posição dos dados, caixa
e inferior da imagem, fundo preto).
sentam figuras ex: (a), devem estar centralizadas na parte inferior da imagem.
Table 20. Cone calorimeter data for various polymers and their nanocomposites with organically modified layered-silicates (OMLS) [reproduced from refer-
ences 243 with permission of the authors and the American Chemical Society, USA].
Sample (structure) % residue Peak HRR Mean HRR Mean Hc Mean SEA Mean CO
yield (±0.5) (kW.m–2) (D%) (kW.m–2) (D%) (MJ.kg–1) (m2.kg–1) yield (kg.kg–1)
N6 1 1010 603 27 197 0.01
N6/MMT 2% (delaminated) 3 686 (32) 390 (35) 27 271 0.01
N6/MMT 5% (delaminated) 6 378 (63) 304 (50) 27 296 0.02
PS 0 1120 703 29 1460 0.09
PS/silicate mix 3% (immiscible) 3 1080 715 29 1840 0.09
PS/MMT 3% 4 567 (48) 444 (38) 27 1730 0.08
(intercalated/delaminated)
PP-g-MA 5 1525 536 39 704 0.02
PP-g-MA/MMT - 2% 6 450 (70) 322 (40) 44 1028 0.02
PP-g-MA/MMT 4% 12 381 (75) 275 (49) 44 968 0.02
fire retardant properties of exfoliated Nylon-12 (2 wt. (%) / 3 wt. (%)) ability with the increasing length of the clay. In other words, the best gas
or intercalated PP/montmorillonite 2 wt. (%) nanocomposites have barrier properties will be obtained by fully exfoliated rather than long
revealed 63% reduction in the HRR peak. layered silicates. Consequently, the presence of spherical, plate, cylin-
Another important feature of polymer/layered silicate nanocom- drical, etc., fillers introduces a tortuous path for a diffusing penetrant.
posites is their gas-barrier properties. Clays are believed to increase The reduction of permeability arises from the longer diffusive path that
the barrier properties by creating a maze or ‘tortuous path’ (Figure 34) the penetrants have to travel in the presence of reinforcements.
that retards the progress of the gas molecules through the matrix26. This Nanocomposites systems have also shown to be able to increase
can be illustrated by the polyimide/clay nanocomposite, which showed the ionic conductivity of polyethylene oxide (PEO)167. The PEO/
significantly improved barrier properties210, 255. This system, containing Li-montmorillonite 60 wt. (%) intercalated nanocomposite showed a
only a small fraction of OMLS (organically modified layered silicates), significant improvement regarding the stability of ionic conductivity
exhibited reduction in the permeability of small molecule gases, e.g. O2, at lower temperature compared to a conventional PEO/LiBF4 mixture
H2O, He, CO2 and ethylacetate vapours210. For example, at 2 wt. (%) (Figure 37)167.
clay loading, the permeability coefficient of water vapour was decreased This improvement is due to the fact that PEO is not able to
ten-fold with synthetic mica relative to pristine polyimide. Figure 35 crystallize when intercalated. This eliminates the presence of crystal-
shows the oxygen gas permeability measurements for PLA/OMLS lites, which are non-conductive in nature. The conductivity of PEO/
nanocomposites (PLA = polylactide)263. The relative permeability
e de Figuras - Materials Research
coefficient value, i.e. PPLACN = PPLA, where PPLACN and PPLA are perme-
Times (Roman),ability
tamanhocoefficients
8. of nanocomposite and pure PLA respectively, is
1.0
rio" - linhas complotted as a function of the wt. (%) of OMLS. Data were fitted with the
0.5 de Stroke. Hectorite
Nielsen theoretical expression263. There is a significant decrease in the
pertencentes a "Dados gráficos" com 0.6 de Stroke.
Relative permeability coefficient

O2 permeability for the nanocomposites, which is more pronounced at 0.8
e que houver rosa do ventos na imagem original, substituir pela padrão da paleta symbols. Saponite
higher clay contents. Polyurethane urea (PUU)/OMLS nanocomposites
himento de barras com 10% dereduced
also reported preto quando
H2O houver
vapourtexto e 50% quando não.
permeability.
na tabela ou figura devem estar todos
The effect em Inglês.
of different types/shapes of fillers (2 wt. (%)) such as 0.6
das devem estar dentro de caixas
organoclay, de texto
either com 2montmorillonite,
exfoliated mm de distância nas extremidades.
synthetic mica or inter-
calated
da figura ou gráfico deveclay
estartactoids (hectorite
em "Sentence case".and saponite), on water permeability of Montmorillonite
0.4
de mapas deverábothter 1partially
ponto deand totally exfoliated polyimide-based nanocomposites
Stroke.
has been reported by Yano et al.255. Results of this study are given in
icrografias, seguir padrão correto (respeitando estilo de escala, posição dos dados, caixa
Figure 36,
go na parte inferior da imagem,where onepreto).
fundo can observe a drastic decrease in relative perme- 0.2
que representam figuras ex: (a), devem estar centralizadas na parte inferior da imagem.
Synthetic mica
0
Conventional composites “Tortuous path” in LS nanocomposites 0 5000 10000
Length of clay (Å)
Figure 36. Clay length dependence on the relative permeability coefficient
ls. for poly(imide)/clay nanocomposites [reproduced from reference 255 with
the kind permission of the authors, John Wiley & Sons Inc.].
Figure 34. “Maze or tortuous path” in polymer/layered silicate nanocompos-
(Roman), tamanhoites 8.
[reproduced from reference 26 with the kind permission of the authors,
nhas com 0.5 deElsevier].
Stroke. Temperature (°C)
ncentes a "Dados gráficos" com 0.6 de Stroke. 100 80 60 40 20
houver rosa do ventos na imagem original, substituir pela padrão da paleta symbols. 4
to de barras com 10% de preto quando houver texto e 50% quando não.
vem estar dentro de caixas200 de texto com 2 mmTheoritical
de distância nasbased
extremidades. 5
curve on Lclay/ Dclay = 275
ra ou gráfico deve estar em "Sentence case". Experimental value
O2TR/mL.mm.m 2.day 1.MPa 1

Log (S.cm)
ols.
fias, seguir padrão correto150
(respeitando estilo de escala, posição dos dados, caixa 6
100
7
50
a
8
2.6 2.8 3.0 3.2 3.4
0 1000/ Temperature (1/K)
0 2 4 6 8 10
40; 60 PEO/Li + MMT (effective O/Li = 10)
OMSFM wt. (%) PEO - LiBF4 (O/Li = 8)
Figure 35. Oxygen gas permeability of neat PLA, various PLACNs as a func-
tion of OMLS content, measured at 20 °C, 90% relative humidity [reproduced Figure 37. Arrhenius plots of ionic conductivity for LiBF4/PEO, PEO Li+
from reference 263 with the kind permission of the authors, the American montmorillonite intercalated nanocomposite [reproduced from reference 167
Chemical Society, USA]. with the kind permission of the authors, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co.]
Li-montmorillonite nanocomposite is 1.6 x 10–6 Ω.cm–1 at 333 K and are almost the same up to 1 month. Other systems which showed large
exhibits weak temperature dependence, with an activation energy improvements in their biodegradability are PCL/OMLS and aliphatic
of 2.8 kcal/mol. Therefore, the higher ionic conductivity at ambient polyester-based nanocomposites18,26,266.
temperature compared to conventional LiBF4/PEO electrolytes and Another way of increasing the biodegradability of resulting ma-
the single ionic conductor behaviour makes PEO/Li-montmorillonite terials is by addition of natural fibres. The use of renewable resources
nanocomposite a new promising electrolyte material. for making biodegradable polymers and reinforcements for nanocom-
Another outstanding feature of polymer nanocomposites prepared posites may lead not only to the achievement of desirable properties,
with OMLS as reinforcements is their noticeably improved biodegrad- but also to the replacement, in the near future, of polymers obtained
ability properties. Figure 38 shows real pictures of PLA/MMT 4 wt. (%) from non-renewable sources. This may help minimizing environmental
nanocomposites and their biodegradability process. Figure 39 shows degradation and waste disposal problems associated with the extensive
the time dependence of the residual weight of the reinforcement (Rw) use of the synthetic polymers in the world.
and the matrix molecular weight (Mw) for PLA and PLA/4 wt. % MMT It is to be noted that a persistent stress on use of high technology
under compost at 58 ± 2 °C 263,265. reinforcements, such as CNTs, in the development of polymer nano-
It is very clear that the biodegradability of PLA is significantly composites may be a limiting factor in view of their high cost. In this
enhanced after the incorporation of MMT. Within one month, both scenario, the possibility of using large quantities of inexpensive natural
the Mw and the percentage of weight loss are at the same level for nanofibrous materials may be explored. Such materials include the
neat PLA and PLA/MMT 4 wt. (%). A sharp change then occurs in natural clay-serpentine group (chrysotile, antigorite, lizardite, amesite),
the weight loss of PLA/MMT 4 wt. (%) after one month. Finally, the nanolayers of the kaolin group (kaolinite, dickite, nacrite), ribbons of
nanocomposite is completely degraded after 2 months. This behaviour the sepiolite-paligorskite group (sepiolite, paligorskite), imogolite of
is accounted for the presence of terminal hydroxylated edge groups in volcanic origin and other minerals with graftable surfaces176. Further,
the silicate layers, which start heterogeneous hydrolysis of the PLA synthetic materials made from the double hydroxide or hydroxyl salt
matrix after absorbing water. Since this process takes time to start, the groups with layered or fibrous structures, and even graftable single
weight loss and degree of hydrolysis for PLA and PLA/4 wt. (%) MMT hydroxides having low cost and involving very common elements, will
also play an important role in the future. In addition, vegetable fibres
disposed of as agricultural production waste can be also reduced to
nanosize range materials and used as reinforcement agents336. Even in
After 32 days After 50 days After 60 days
such non-graftable reinforcement surfaces, one can choose an appropri-
ate chemical treatment and moulding temperature and carefully select
the polymer to arrive at the best chemical compatibilization, leading to
the optimized properties of the resulting materials. It is observed that
these treatments usually improve the surface adhesive characteristics of
the vegetable fibres through the removal of non-crystalline components
Pure PLA such as lignin and hemicelluloses.
3.3.3. Polymer-nanofibre / CNT nanocomposites

Carbon nanofibres, which are known to range from disordered
“bamboo-like” to highly ordered “cup stacked” graphite structures,
and have diameters in the range of 50-200 nm, have been employed as
PLA/MMT 4 wt. (%) reinforcing materials in a variety of polymer matrix compounds, includ-
ing both thermoset polymers such as epoxy, polyimide and phenolic,
Figure 38. Biodegradability studies for neat PLA, PLA/MMT 4 wt. (%). The
initial dimensions of the crystallized samples were 3 x 10 x 0.1 cm3 [repro- and thermoplastic polymers, as polypropylene, polystyrene, PMMA,
duced from reference 263 with the kind permission of the authors, Elsevier, Nylon 12, and PEEK293,299. Properties of nanotubes have already been
the American Chemical Society, USA]. given in Table 12. Young’s modulus and tensile strength of the PP
nanocomposites were found to increase due to the good adhesion of
oxidised carbon fibres, but stiffness showed a reverse trend with the
increasing volume fraction of the fibres. Even compressive strength
and torsional moduli of the nanocomposites were found to be higher
PLACN4 than that from the PEEK matrix. These scanty results on nanofibre-
PLA 150 containing polymer composites reveal a need for more detailed and
Mw x 10 3 (gm.mol 1)
systematic studies on the dispersion and adhesion aspects, considering

ls. 100
the varying morphologies of the fibres.
80 100 Thostenson and Chou230,231 have described the elastic properties
Rw /%
60
of aligned MWCNTs in a polystyrene matrix nanocomposite system.
Adopting ‘micromechanics’ approach, they have derived the axial elas-
40 50
tic properties of CNTs considering equivalent effective fibre properties,
20 PLACN4 viz., tube diameter, distribution and volume distribution as a function of
PLA 0 tube diameter. This gives a relationship between Young’s modulus and
a 0 various dimensions of fibres, including their volume. Similar relation-
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 ships of physical and mechanical properties would probably help in
Time/days producing materials for specific applications.
Figure 39. Time dependence of the residual weight, Rw, of the matrix Significant toughening of polymer matrices after CNT incorpora-
molecular weight, Mw, for PLA, PLA/MMT 4 wt. (%) under compost at tion has been reported. A phenol-based nanocomposite using CNTs with
58 ± 2 °C [reproduced from reference 265 with the kind permission of the tube diameter <50 nm and length >0 µm showed an enhancement in
authors, Elsevier]. Young’s modulus and strength. SEM images of brittle tensile fracture
surfaces showed fairly uniform nanotube distribution and nanotube 4. Applications of Nanocomposites2,16-35,258,305,310,337-378
pullout232. Epoxy/DWCNT (double-wall carbon nanotubes) nanocom-
posites showed increased strength, Young’s modulus, fracture toughness From the foregoing, it becomes evident that nanocomposites may
and strain to failure at a nanotube content of only 0.1 wt. (%)233. In this provide many benefits such as enhanced properties, reduction of solid
system, the nanotubes were highly dispersed in the polymer matrix. wastes [lower gauge thickness films and lower reinforcement usage]
Also, phenylethyl terminated polyimide/MWCNT nanocomposites and improved manufacturing capability, particularly for packaging ap-
exhibited increased tensile Young’s modulus and reduced tensile plications. Tables 21 to 23 present potential applications of ceramic-,
strength and ultimate strain. In this system, the nanotubes were a few metal- and polymer-based nanocomposites, respectively. As it can be
hundred µm in length and 20-100 nm in diameter234. The polyethylene/ observed, the promising applications of nanocomposite systems are
MWCNT nanocomposite showed an increase in strain energy density numerous, comprising both the generation of new materials and the
by 150% and in ductility by 140%. Polyacrylonitrile/MWNTs systems performance enhancement of known devices such as fuel cells, sensors
showed 80% increase in energy to yield and energy to break27. Finally, and coatings. Although the use of nanocomposites in industry is not
silicone elastomer-SWCNT reinforced composites have shown dramatic yet large, their massive switching from research to industry has already
increases in both stiffness and strength30. started and is expected to be extensive in the next few years.
Coming to the morphological studies of CNT-containing polymer For instance, the (Al1-xTixN)/α-Si3N4 super hard nanocomposite,
nanocomposites, Figure 40 represents a TEM image of polystyerene which has been developed by the Czech company SHM Ltd. as a
containing 5 wt. (%) nanocomposite film processed by Thostenson and
Chou230,231. Large-scale dispersion and alignment of carbon nanotubes
in the polymer matrix can be observed from this image, which could Table 21. Potential applications of ceramic nanocomposite systems.
explain the observed properties. Nanocomposites Applications
Similarly, nanotubes are separated into individual tubes in the
SiO2/Fe High performance catalysts, data storage
microstructure of epoxy/CNTs as shown in Figure 41, indicating their
technology.
good dispersion. Also, they remain curved in the nanocomposite as a
result of their sharp flexibility150. ZnO/Co Field effect transistor for the optical femto-
To conclude, CNT-polymer composites, though may pose greater second study of interparticle interactions.
challenges for the Materials Scientists, will exhibit unique properties Metal oxides/Metal Catalysts, sensors, opto-electronic
as mentioned above and hence offer greater potentials in terms of ap- devices.
plications. This is presented in the next Section. BaTiO3/SiC, PZT/Ag Electronic industry, high performance
ferroelectric devices.
SiO2/Co Optical fibres.
SiO2/Ni Chemical sensors.
Al2O3/SiC Structural materials.
Si3N4/SiC Structural materials.
Al2O3/NdAlO3 & Solid-state laser media, phosphors and
Al2O3/LnAlO3 optical amplifiers.
s. TiO2/Fe2O3 High-density magnetic recording media,
ferrofluids and catalysts.
Al2O3/Ni Engineering parts.
PbTiO3/PbZrO3 Microelectronic and micro-electromechan-
ical systems.
Table 22. Potential applications of metal nanocomposite systems.

Nanocomposites Applications
Fe/MgO Catalysts, magnetic devices.
1 Mm
Figure 40. TEM micrograph of process-induced orientation in nanocomposite
Ni/PZT Wear resistant coatings and thermally graded
ribbons. The arrow indicates the direction of alignment taken as the principal coatings.
direction with a nanotube orientation of 0° [reproduced from reference 230 Ni/TiO2 Photo-electrochemical applications.
with the kind permission of the authors, the Institute of Physics Publishing, Al/SiC Aerospace, naval and automotive structures.
USA].
Cu/Al2O3 Electronic packaging.
Al/AlN Microelectronic industry.
Ni/TiN, Ni/ZrN, High speed machinery, tooling, optical and
Cu/ZrN magnetic storage materials.
Nb/Cu Structural materials for high temperature ap-
plications.
Fe/Fe23C6/Fe3B Structural materials.
ls. 1 Mm 0.1 Mm
Fe/TiN Catalysts.
Al/Al2O3 Microelectronic industry.
Figure 41. SEM micrographs showing the distribution of CNTs through epoxy
resin [reproduced from reference150 with the kind permission of the authors, Au/Ag Microelectronics, optical devices, light energy
the American Institute of Physics, USA]. conversion.
Table 23. Potential applications of polymer nanocomposite systems.

Nanocomposites Applications
Polycaprolactone/SiO2 Bone-bioerodible for skeletal tissue repair.
Polyimide/SiO2 Microelectronics.
PMMA/SiO2 Dental application, optical devices.
Polyethylacrylate/SiO2 Catalysis support, stationary phase for chromatography.
Poly(p-phenylene vinylene)/SiO2 Non-liner optical material for optical waveguides.
Poly(amide-imide) / TiO2 Composite membranes for gas separation applications.
poly(3,4-ethylene-dioxythiophene)/V2O5 Cathode materials for rechargeable lithium batteries.
Polycarbonate/SiO2 Abrasion resistant coating.
Shape memory polymers/SiC Medical devices for gripping or releasing therapeutics within blood vessels.
Nylon-6/LS Automotive timing-belt – TOYOTA.
PEO/LS Airplane interiors, fuel tanks, components in electrical and electronic parts, brakes and tires.
PLA/LS Lithium battery development.
PET/clay Food packaging applications. Specific examples include packaging for processed meats, cheese,
confectionery, cereals and boil-in-the-bag foods, fruit juice and dairy products, beer and carbon-
ated drinks bottles.
Thermoplastic olefin/clay Beverage container applications.
Polyimide/clay Automotive step assists - GM Safari and Astra Vans.
Epoxy/MMT Materials for electronics.
SPEEK/laponite Direct methanol fuel cells.
tribological coating for tools, is suitable for hard and dry cutting opera- structural materials, electronic, optical, magnetic, mechanical and
tions such as drilling, turning and milling, and is reported to be now energy conversion devices suggested by researchers in the field.
industrialized337,339. In this case, a novel method, which employs vacuum CNT-ceramic composites, on their turn, are reported340 to be poten-
arc coating with a rotating cathode, is used for commercial production. tial candidates for aerospace and sports goods, composite mirrors and
This super hard (Al1-xTix)N/α-Si3N4 possess high tensile strength, in the automotive spares requiring electrostatic painting. Such materials have
range of 10-110 GPa, and a lifetime 2-4 times higher than that of the also been reported341 to be useful for flat panel displays, gas storage
materials currently employed as wear resistant coatings. devices, toxic gas sensors, Li+ batteries, robust but lightweight parts
Similarly, one of the leading application areas is the automotive sec- and conducting paints. One example is the Al2O3-CNT composite,
tor, with striking impact due to improved functionalities such as ecology, which shows high contact damage resistance without a corresponding
safety, comfort, etc. Details on the commercial usage of nanocompos- increase in toughness and hardness. It is reported92 to be a candidate
ites in automotives and future developments in this sector (including for engineering and biomedical applications.
CNT-based nanocomposites) are now available362. For instance, there Despite these possibilities, there are only limited examples of
are reports on the current use of a number of nanocoatings in different industrial use of nanocomposite, mainly due to the challenges in
parts of Audi, Evobus and Diamler Chrysler automobiles, as well as processing and the cost involved, particularly for non-structural ap-
ongoing trials on fuel cells, porous filters (foams) and energy conversion plications. In fact, one recent review371 deals with various methods for
components, which include nanoTiO2-containing paints. Additionally, the preparation of super hard coatings with merits and demerits of each
light weight bodies made of metal- or polymer-based nanocomposites method. However, the intense research in both metal- and ceramic-
with suitable reinforcements are reported to exhibit low density and very based nanocomposites suggests that the days are not far off when they
high strength (e.g. carbon Bucky fibers, with strength of 150 GPa and will be actually in use. The cost factor may be a particularly serious
weight ≈1/5th of steel). Also, two-phase heterogeneous nanodielectrics, problem for general engineering applications, while this may not be the
generally termed dielectric nanocomposites, have wide applications in case for specialized applications in electronics, aerospace, biomedical
electric and electronic industries338. and other sectors, since the advantages might far outweigh costs and
Metal and ceramic nanocomposites are expected to generate a concerns in these sectors.
great impact over a wide variety of industries, including the aerospace, On the other hand, polymer-based nanocomposites are in the fore-
electronic and military305, while polymer nanocomposites major impacts front of applications due to their more advanced development status
will probably appear in battery cathodes6,342, microelectronics343, non- compared to metal and ceramic counterparts, in addition to their unique
linear optics344, sensors345, etc. Improved properties include significant properties. These include 2-3 fold strength property increase, even
enhancements in fracture strength (about 2 times) and toughness (about with low reinforcement content (1-4 wt. (%)) [e.g. 102.7% in Young’s
one half time); no time dependent wear transitions even at very low modulus] with complete elimination of voids/holes; gas barrier proper-
loads; higher high temperature strength and creep resistance; increased ties (about 200,000 times over oriented PP and about 2000 times that of
hardness with increasing heat treatment temperature; hardness values Nylon-6 with tenfold requirements of expensive organic modifiers) 372,
higher than those of existing commercial steel and alloys; possibility of biodegradation and reduced flammability [about 60% reduction of heat
synthesis of inexpensive materials; and significant increase in Young’s release rate], etc. In addition, a good possibility of enhancing the shelf
modulus [about 105%], shear modulus and fracture strength (almost life of the existing MRE packaging and trays used in the UGR-H&S
3 times compared to microcomposites). These are brought out mainly polymeric materials has also been reported350. This is due to the limita-
by the nanosize reinforcements used, which result in an appropriate tions of existing MRE packings, which do not meet the US military
morphology for the products. Tables 21 and 22 summarize the possible standards such as minimum shelf life of 6 and 12 months at about 322 K
developments associated with these materials in catalysts, sensors, (120 °F) and 299 K (80 °F) respectively. In this case, nanocomposites,
which exhibit better gas barrier properties, can provide a longer shelf types, door handles, engine covers, intake manifolds and timing belt
life. Such packaging, with different matrices and reinforcements, as covers363,364, with some of these already being exploited. For example,
well as different processing conditions, is being field tested by the US a thermoplastic nanocomposite containing nanoflake reinforcements
army since 2002 to arrive at an optimum combination. This is expected (trade name Basell TPO-Nano) is being employed for the development
to reduce cost by 10-30% (nearly US$ 1-3 million) compared to the of stiff and light exterior parts, like the step-assists by GM348. Also,
presently used materials, in addition to better performance. porous polymer nanocomposites can be employed for the develop-
Various types of polymer-based nanocomposites, containing ment of pollution filters365. Other promising technological application
insulating, semiconducting or metallic nanoparticles, have been de- in the horizon is in air bag sensors, where nano-optical platelets are
veloped to meet the requirements of specific applications. Recently, kept inside the polymer outer layer for transmitting signals at speed of
some PLS nanocomposites have become commercially available18, light gaining milliseconds to bring down the level of possible impact
being applied237 as ablatives and as high performance biodegradable injuries373. Finally, polymer/inorganic nanocomposites with improved
composites265,267,280,343,346, as well as in electronic and food packag- conductivity, permeability, water management and interfacial resistance
ing industries346,347. These include Nylon-6 (e.g. Durethan LDPU60 at the electrode are natural candidates for the replacement of traditional
by Bayer Food Packages)18 and polypropylene for packaging and Nafion PEM in fuel cells, and are currently under trial349.
injection-molded articles, semi-crystalline nylon for ultra-high bar- Improvements in the mechanical properties of polymer nanocom-
rier containers and fuel systems, epoxy electrocoating primers and posites have also resulted in their many general/industrial applications.
high voltage insulation, unsaturated polyester for watercraft lay-ups These include impellers and blades for vacuum cleaners, power tool
and outdoor advertising panels, and polyolefin fire-retardant cables, housings, and mower hoods and covers for portable electronic equip-
electrical enclosures and housings. Table 24 shows some examples ment, such as mobile phones and pagers366. Another example is the use
of commercially available polymer nanocomposites. As an example, of polymer nanocomposites in glues for the manufacturing of pressure
Nylon-6/surface-modified montmorillonite 2 wt. (%) nanocomposites moulds in the ceramic industry.
are currently available from two commercial sources, Honeywell En- The development of environmentally friendly, non-foil and better
gineered Polymers & Solutions and Bayer AG. Some of the products packaging materials can reduce the amount of solid waste, improve
made from nanocomposites are shown in Figure 42.
package manufacturing capabilities, and reduce the overall logistics
Technological contributions in the areas of gas barrier, reinforce-
(Roman), tamanho ment 8. and flame retardancy have also been extensively exploited
355,356
.
For
nhas com 0.5 de Stroke. example, heat-resistant polymer nanocomposites are used to make Center bridge
fire fighter protective clothing and lightweight components suitable to
Sail panel
work in situations of high temperature and stress. This includes hoods Box Rail
of automobiles and skins of jet aircrafts, as opposed to heavier and
o de barras com costlier
10% de preto
metalquando
alloys.houver
They texto
can ealso
50%replace
quando corrosion-prone
não. metals
ela ou figura devem estarbuilding
in the todos emofInglês.
bridges and other large structures with potentially
em estar dentro de caixas
lighter anddestronger
texto com 2 mm de distância
capabilities357, 358 nas unsaturated
. Also, extremidades.
polyester (UPE)
ra ou gráfico devenanocomposites
estar em "Sentence cancase".
be employed in fibre-reinforced products used
in marine,
pas deverá ter 1 ponto transportation and construction industries359-361. Currently,
de Stroke.
UPE/fibreglass nanocomposites, whose formulations are available
fias, seguir padrão correto (respeitando estilo de escala, posição dos dados, caixa
from Polymeric
arte inferior da imagem, Supply, Inc., are being used in boat accessories that
fundo preto).
are stronger and less prone to colour fading362.
Regarding the variety of applications of polymer nanocomposites, Food packaging Foot rest
prominent impacts over the automotive industry can be highlighted, Figure 42. Nanocomposite-containing products [reproduced from references
including their use in tyres, fuel systems, gas separation membranes 347, 351, with the kind permission of US Army Natick Soldier Center, Plastics
in fuel cells and seat textiles, mirror housings on various vehicle Technology, USA, AzoNano.com, PvtLtd., USA].
Table 24. Commercial polymer nanocomposites and their respective target markets (CNT = carbon nanotubes).
Supplier & Tradename Matrix resin Nano-filler Target market
Bayer AG (Durethan LPDU) Nylon 6 Organoclay Barrier films
Clariant PP Organoclay Packaging
Creanova (Vestamid) Nylon 12 CNTs Electrically conductive
GE Plastics (Noryl GTX) PPO/Nylon CNTs Automotive painted parts
Honeywell Nylon 6 Barrier Nylon Organoclay Multi-purpose
(Aegis) Organoclay Bottles and film
Hyperion PETG, PBT, PPS, PC, PP CNTs Electrically conductive
Kabelwerk Eupen of Belgium EVA Organoclay Wire & cable
Nanocor Nylon 6 PP Nylon MDX6 Organoclay Multi-purpose moulding
(Imperm) Organoclay PET beer bottles
Organoclay
Showa Denko (Systemer) Nylon 6 Acetal Clay Mica Flame retardancy Multi-purpose
Clay, mica
Ube Nylon 6, 12 Nylon 6, 66 Organoclay Multi-purpose
(Ecobesta) Organoclay Auto fuel systems
Antai Haili Ind. & Commerce of China UHMWPE Organoclay Earthquake-resistant pipes
burden to users. In this context, the incorporation of nanoclay particles by many leading industries. Packaging, coating and automotive sectors
into thermoplastic resins has shown to be highly effective to improve are in the forefront for the use of these new materials.
barrier properties and package survivability351. Such excellent barrier With increasing demand for high performance systems such as
characteristics have resulted in considerable interest in clay nanocom- nanofillers and their composites and many sectors looking for them
posites in food packaging applications, both flexible and rigid. Specific at low costs, optimistic estimates do not seem beyond reach372. A
examples include packaging for processed meats, cheese, confectionery, bright future is evident as many leading industrial laboratories, such
cereals and boil-in-the-bag foods, also extrusion-coating applications in as Argonne National Laboratory, are ready for commercialization of
association with paperboard for fruit juice and dairy products, together their nanoproducts [organoclays] and looking for industrial partners
with co-extrusion processes for the manufacture of beer and carbonated to develop and/or test them in a wide range of applications. Many
drinks bottles367. The use of nanocomposite formulations would be of these are consumer products, and hence the envisaged market is
expected to enhance considerably the shelf life of many types of food. expected to establish itself. For example, electroconductive polymers,
Honeywell industries have also been active in developing a combined nanosmart switches and sensors for automotives are already in use by
active/passive oxygen barrier system for polyamide-6 materials368. It is GE and Cabot in USA, while since 2002 General Motors has success-
mentioned here that Triton Systems and the US Army are conducting fully used nanocomposites containing clay and talc in their exterior
further work on barrier performance in a joint investigation, as men- structural components.
tioned earlier. They are trying to develop a non-refrigerated packaging Further, as new power production and storage devices are at-
system capable of maintaining food freshness for three years. Polymer/ tractive products, other nanotech revolutions expected to take place
clay nanocomposites are currently showing considerable promise for in the near future are reported373 to be hydrogen storage, fuel cells,
this application. supercapacitors and batteries. In fact, it has been pointed out that the
The reduction of solvent transmission is another interesting aspect infrastructure cost of automotives would decrease by 10-100 times by
of polymer/clay nanocomposites. A study conducted by the UBE the use of fuel cells alone, with other nanotechnologies having similar
Industries has revealed347 significant reductions in fuel transmission impact. Future areas of research, particularly for the automotive industry
through polyamide-6/66 polymers by incorporation of a nanoclay filler. could be i) improved fire retardancy of nanocomposites, which can be
As a result, these materials are very attractive for the development of used as interior parts, ii) improved weatherability for use as exterior
improved fuel tanks and fuel line components for cars. In addition, parts, and iii) bipolarity, obtained by the use of nanocarbons, for the
the reduced fuel transmission means significant cost reductions. The production of fuel cells. Similarly, the coating and internal structure
presence of filler incorporation at nanolevels has also been shown to of combustion engines may receive attention in the case of ceramic-
have significant effects on the transparency and haze characteristics of based nanocomposites.
films369 in comparison to conventionally filled polymers. The ability to Nanoclays are expected to have 50% of the total nanomaterials
minimize the extent to which water is absorbed can be a major advantage market by 2020. Also, with the expected decrease in cost of CNTs, their
for polymer materials that are degraded in moist environments370. nanocomposites are also expected to gain large share in the markets,
Finally, CNT-polymer composites are reported28 to be potential thereby leading to the rapid commercialization of CNTs themselves374.
candidates for data storage media, photovoltaic cells and photo diodes, It is also reported that two of the sectors, automotive and packaging,
optical limiting devices, drums for printers, etc. which will account for about 40% of demand by 2020, will be most
important for the next decade or so. Then, the construction sector will
5. Perspectives probably dominate, while CNT-based nanocomposites will replace the
presently used conducting materials in the electrical and electronic
Outstanding potentials of nanocomposites can be exemplified industries375.
by the massive investments from many companies and governments Considering the use of polymer-based nanocomposites during
throughout the world. As a result, nanocomposites are expected to 2003 at 11,000 tons (11 million kg) at US$ 90.8 million, Business
generate a great impact in world economy and business. This is very Communications Co. Inc., in its report on nanocomposites published
much evident from the publications pouring in, particularly on a variety in April 2004, has estimated this market to increase by nearly 3 times
of properties suited for different applications350. According to a report (35,960 tons) at US$ 211.1 during the current year (2008), with an
from Principia Partners, which is illustrated in Table 25, a market size annual growth rate (AAGR) of 18.4%377. Of this, thermoplastics,
of over than U$ 1,834 billion (USD) is estimated by 2009, considering which were about 5.68 million kg at US$ 70.7 in 2003, would grow to
only the different applications of polymer/clay nanocomposites350. The 27.74 million kg with about 20.4% AAGR at US$ 178.9 million, while
estimative may not be exaggerated, since many of the application areas thermosets, with 5.45 million kg at US$ 20.1 million, would grow to
already use these composites, with some of them being commercialized 8.22 million kg with about 9.9 AAGR at US$ 32.2 million. Even if
some difficulties are to be encountered for this, present applications
of these materials are expected to grow higher than 20% of the total
Table 25. Estimated market size, by 2009, regarding different applications of demand of polymer composites, with the fastest demand in engineered
polymer/clay nanocomposites [reproduced from reference 350 with the kind plastics and elastomers374,376. On the other hand, with thermoset-based
permission of the author and publishers] nanocomposites being not so diverse compared to their thermoplastics
Technology/Application Estimated market size counterparts, their market is expected to grow at the rate mentioned
(by 2009) above based on the current uses of these composites in pre-finished
million US$ wood flooring and other sectors.
There are other forecasts for US such as the ones from Freedonia
Polymer-Clay Nanocomposites Over $183 billion US$ Industry, which reports on the profiles of major industries in the area
Packaging 671 of nanocomposites in USA, market trends and indicators for these
Automotive 631 materials for every five years from 2010375. According to them, the
Building & Construction 276 demand for nanocomposites will be about 159 million kg by 2010 and
about 3.2 billion kg, valued at US$ 15 billion, by 2020. The other esti-
Coatings 115
mate376 for the global nanocomposite market rises to US$ 250 million
Industrial 87 with AAGR between 18-25% by 2008. It is also reported374 that the
Others 122 packaging industry alone would use about 1.7 million kg of polymer
nanocomposites in the beverage and food industries by 2009, and that this regard, critical issues to be looked into include aspects of disper-
this will grow to about 45 million kg. All the above mentioned projec- sion, alignment, volume and rate of fabrication and, finally, cost ef-
tions, though varying marginally, may not be exaggerated in view of the fectiveness. Some light has been thrown on these aspects30. Probably,
research options made by some of the developed countries, with USA processing-structure-properties maps similar to those developed for
leading with 400 research centres and industries with investments to metals and alloys by Ashby379 may further enhance the potentials of
the tune of US$ 3.4 billion, Europe with 175 organizations/industries nanocomposites. This is because structure, which is dictated by the
with about US$ 1.7 billion and Japan with 100 organizations350. processing method, in turn dictates the properties of materials. Added
Some of the challenges to be faced for the success of the above to this is the engineering aspect of design.
projections, which will also give future research directions, include: For materials scientists, design could be one of the following380:
suitable reinforcements such as nanofibres with or without spinning, i) design of materials having combinations of unique properties or ii)
which will have higher strength properties, being lighter than their micro selection of materials having better characteristics for a specific purpose
counterparts and hence appearing as superior structural components; or iii) development of a new process for providing one of the above
use of nanofibres in different areas such as biomedical, electrical and mentioned materials. Besides, in engineering a term called ‘performance
optical, for various functional devices; conducting polymer-based nano- index’ (P) is defined, which correlates the properties of materials for
materials for electrochemical applications; modification of the mechani- a given product, and helps in their selection for specific applications.
cal behaviour of nanocomposites to get higher performances; surface The higher the value of P, the better will be the performance380. Further,
modification of polymer nanofibres for their use in polymer matrices another correlation generally used is between the relative cost and the
to overcome the poor interfacial bonding; modelling and simulation of performance index, whereby one can arrive at the economical material
mechanical properties of nanofibre-containing composites, etc.377. selection for a given product. The above concepts should also be ap-
Other issues, which are also expected to get due attention, include
plied in the case of nanocomposites, so that one could get the maximum
various processing parameters in the case of the three types of nano-
benefit from them in any application.
composites, without which their wide spread commercialization would
Finally, as part of the social implications of this nascent and poten-
not come through. These include problems with compatibility and de-
tial technology, there are some safety aspects to be considered while
agglomeration, which can be overcome through surface modification
dealing with nanosized particles and their composites. For example,
of reinforcements for homogeneous dispersion without agglomeration.
fabrics coated with nanoparticles are available, which can be configured
The above, along with appropriate positioning of reinforcements [ex-
to imbue the fabric with various attributes. Aerosolised chemical and
foliation and orientation] in the case of polymer-based composites are
also issues to be solved. biological agents are a clear threat that is likely to grow in the future.
Other promising area for future research on proper inexpen- The release of nanoparticles into the environment is a major health
sive reinforcements is the use of cheap and abundantly available and safety issue. Hence there is an increasing need for research into
polymeric (maybe recyclable) and reinforcing materials of natural emission of nanocomposites and nanoparticles. Potentially harmful
origin for wide applications. If the latter can replace expensive characteristics of nanotechnology products based on their large sur-
carbon nanotubes, the cost of their nanocomposite products may be face area, crystalline structure and reactivity may facilitate their easy
reduced to extend them to popular applications. Hence, concentrated transport into the environment or interaction with cell constituents,
efforts will be needed to find new formulations with materials from thus exacerbating many harmful effects related to their composition.
renewable resources (such as polymers derived from plasticized One recent conference was devoted to the study of the safety and risks
saccharides, polylactide (PLA), polyhydroxylalkanoates (PHAs), of nanoparticles381, while the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
poly (ε-caprolactone), etc.), reinforced with easily available mineral/ (EPA), as part of its Science to Achieve Results (STAR) program, is
vegetal materials or synthetic reinforcements based on common seeking applications that evaluate the potential impacts of manufactured
elements like hydroxides, layered double hydroxides and layered nanomaterials on human health and the environment. This is important
hydroxide salts. The same procedure can also be used to improve the as new nanomaterials are constantly being manufactured; there is always
properties of synthetic biodegradable polymers. Research in these a possibility of human and environmental exposure to waste streams,
directions will be a certainty, keeping in view the increased attention or other pathways entering the environment382.
on cleaner environment and ecology.
The study of nanocomposites is an interdisciplinary area, encom- 6. Conclusions
passing physics, chemistry, biology, materials science and engineering.
Therefore, the knowledge arising from scientists with different back- In conclusion, new technologies require materials showing novel
grounds will undoubtedly create new science, and in particular new properties and/or improved performance compared to conventionally
materials, with unforeseen technological possibilities such as creation processed components. In this context, nanocomposites are suitable
of macroscopic engineered materials through nanoscale structures. materials to meet the emerging demands arising from scientific and
It is therefore rightly pointed out that this calls for basic research on technologic advances. Processing methods for different types of na-
structure-property correlations in nanocomposites, leading to new chal- nocomposites (CMNC, MMNC and PMNC) are available, but some
lenges in the development of suitable fabrication techniques for dealing of these pose challenges thus giving opportunities for researchers to
with nanoscale materials, for their characterization and mechanics, in overcome the problems being encluntered with nanosize materials.
order to understand interactions at such sizes30. Another exciting aspect They offer improved performance over monolithic and microcomposite
is that nanocomposites will benefit many sectors of our society, includ- counterparts and are consequently suitable candidates to overcome the
ing electronics and chemical, space and transportation industries, as well limitations of many currently existing materials and devices. A number
as medicine, health care and environmental protection. Because of this, of applications already exists, while many potentials are possible for
nanocomposites are expected be of high impact in the improvement of these materials, which open new vistas for the future. In view of their
our quality of life in the coming years. unique properties such as very high mechanical properties even at low
As the properties of nanostructured composites are highly structure/ loading of reinforcements, gas barrier and flame related properties,
size dependent, many research studies still have to be performed to many potential applications and hence the market for these materials
provide a better understanding of the structure-property relationship in have been projected in various sectors. Thus all the three types of na-
such systems. This is an essential requirement to allow the nanoscale nocomposites provide opportunities and rewards creating new world
design of multi-functional materials for engineering applications. In wide interest in these new materials.
Acknowledgements 17. Peigney A, Laurent CH, Flahaut E, Rousset A. Carbon nanotubes in

novel ceramic matrix nanocomposites. Ceramic International. 2000;
We are grateful to all authors of the papers, publishers of the jour- 26(6):677-683.
nals from where tables and figures have been reproduced [The American 18. Alexandre M, Dubois P. Polymer-layered silicate nanocomposites:
Chemical Society, American Institute of Chemical Engineers, American preparation, properties and uses of a new class of materials. Materials
Institute of Physics, Elsevier, Institute of Physics, Japan Society of Science & Engineering. 2000; 28(1-2):1-63.
Powder, Powder Metallurgy, John Wiley & Sons, Materials Research 19. Gangopadhyay R, Amitabha D. Conducting polymer nanocomposites:
Society, Plastics Technology Magazine, Springer-Verlag, Wiley-VCH a brief overview. Chemistry of Materials. 2000; 12(7): 608-622.
Verlag Gmbh & Co, web sites], for their courtesy and kind permission. 20. Thostenson ET, Ren Z, Chou TW. Advances in the science and
The authors sincerely express their gratitude to Professor Jaisa F. Soares technology of carbon nanotubes and their composites: a review.
of Department of Chemistry, UFPR for her reading of the full manu- Composites Science & Technology. 2001; 61(13):1899-1912.
script, editing both technical and language aspects as well for her critical 21. Pokropivnyi VV. Two-dimensional nanocomposites: photonic crystals
suggestions. We also acknowledge Mr. Gregorio Guadalupe Carbajal and nanomembranes (review): Types and preparation. Powder
Arizaga, Department of Chemistry, UFPR, Mahesh Kestur Satya, USA, Metallurgy and Metal Ceramics. 2002a; 41(5-6):264-272.
for their reading of the paper and useful suggestions. 22. Pokropivnyi VV. Two-dimensional nanocomposites: photonic crystals
and nanomembranes (review). II: Properties and applications. Powder
References Metallurgy and Metal Ceramics. 2002b; 41(7-8):369-381.
23. Gall K, Dunn ML, Liu Y, Finch D, Lake M, Munshi NA. Shape memory
1. Roy R, Roy RA, Roy DM. Alternative perspectives on “quasi- polymer nanocomposites. Acta Materialia. 2002; 50(20):5115-5126.
crystallinity”: non-uniformity and nanocomposites. Materials Letters.
24. Kickelbick G. Concepts for the incorporation of inorganic building
1986; 4(8-9):323-328.
blocks into organic polymers on a nanoscale. Progress in Polymer
2. Schmidt D, Shah D, Giannelis EP. New advances in polymer/layered Science. 2003; 28(1):83-114.
silicate nanocomposites. Current Opinion in Solid State & Materials
25. Fischer H. Polymer nanocomposites: from fundamental research to
Science. 2002; 6(3):205-212.
specific applications. Materials Science and Engineering: C. 2003;
3. Gleiter H. Materials with ultrafine microstructures: retrospectives and 23(6-8):763-772.
perspectives. Nanostructured Materials. 1992; 1(1):1-19. 26. Ray SS, Okamoto M. Polymer - layered silicate nanocomposites: a
4. Braun T, Schubert A, Sindelys Z. Nanoscience and nanotechnology on review from preparation to processing. Progress in Polymer Science.
the balance. Scientometrics. 1997; 38(2):321-325. 2003; 28(11):1539-1641.
5. Kamigaito O. What can be improved by nanometer composites? Journal 27. Andrews R, Weisenberger MC. Carbon nanotube polymer composites.
of Japan Society of Powder Metalurgy. 1991; 38:315-321. Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science. 2004;
6. Iijima S. Helical microtubes of graphitic carbon. Nature. 1991; 8(1):31‑37.
354(6348):56-58. 28. Wang C, Guo ZX, Fu S, Wu W, Zhu D. Polymers containing fullerene
or carbon nanotube structures. Progress in Polymer Science. 2004;
7. Biercuk MJ, Llaguno MC, Radosvljevicm, HJ. Carbon nanotube
29(11):1079-1141.
composites for thermal management. Appied Physics Letters. 2002;
80(15):2767-2769. 29. Pandey JK, Reddy KR, Kumar AP, Singh RP. An overview on the
degradability of polymer nanocomposites. Polymer Degradation and
8. Ounaies Z, Park C, Wise KE, Siochi EJ, Harrison JS. Electrical properties
Stability. 2005; 88(2):234-250.
of single wall carbon nanotube reinforced polyimide composites.
Composites Science and Technology. 2003; 63(11):1637‑1646. 30. Thostenson ET, Li C, Chou TW. Nanocomposites in context. Composites
Science and Technology. 2005; 65(3-4):491-516.
9. Weisenberger MC, Grulke EA, Jacques D, Ramtell T, Andrews R.
31. Jordan J, Jacob KI, Tannenbaum R, Sharaf MA, Jasiuk I. Experimental
Enhanced mechanical properties of polyacrylonitrile: multiwall
trends in polymer nanocomposites: a review. Materials Science and
carbon nanotube composite fibers. Journal of Nanoscience and
Engineering: A. 2005; 393(1-2):1-11.
Nanotechnology. 2003; 3(6):535-539.
32. Choi SM, Awaji H. Nanocomposites: a new material design concept.
10. Dalton AB, Coolins S, Muñoz E, Razal JM, Ebron VH, Ferraris
Science and Technology of Advanced Materials. 2005; 6(1):2-10.
JP et al. Super-tough carbon-nanotube fibres: these extraordinary
composite fibres can be woven into electronic textiles. Nature. 2003; 33. Xie XL, Mai YW, Zhou XP. Dispersion and alignment of carbon
423(6941):703-703. nanotubes in polymer matrix: a review. Materials Science and
Engineering: R. 2005; 49(4):89-112.
11. Choa YH, Yang JK, Kim BH, Jeong YK, Lee JS, Nakayama T et al.
34. Ray SS, Bousmina M. Biodegradable polymers and their layered silicate
Preparation and characterization of metal: ceramic nanoporous
nanocomposites: in greening the 21st century materials world. Progress
nanocomposite powders. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic
in Matererials Science. 2005; 50(8):962-1079.
Materials. 2003; 266(1-2):12-19.
35. Pandey JK, Kumar AP, Misra M, Mohanty AK, Drzal LT, Singh
12. Wypych F, Seefeld N, Denicolo I. Preparation of nanocomposites based
RP. Recent advances in biodegradable nanocomposites. Journal of
on the encapsulation of conducting polymers into 2H-MoS2 and 1T-TiS2. Nanoscience and Nanotechnology. 2005; 5(4):497-526.
Quimica Nova. 1997; 20(4):356-360.
36. Awaji H, Choi SM., Yagi E. Mechanisms of toughening and
13. Aruna ST, Rajam KS. Synthesis, characterisation and properties strengthening in cermaic-based nanocomposites. Mechanics of
of Ni/PSZ and Ni/YSZ nanocomposites. Scripta Materialia. 2003; Materials 2002; 34(7):411-422.
48(5):507-512.
37. Niihara K. New design concept of strctural ceramics-ceramic
14. Giannelis EP. Polymer layered silicate nanocomposites. Advanced nanocomposite. Journal of the Ceramic Society of Japan (Nippon
Materials. 1996; 8(1):29-35. Seramikkusu Kyokai Gakujutsu Ronbunshi). 1991; 99(6):974-982.
15. Wypych F, Adad LB. Grothe MC: synthesis and characterisation of the 38. Nakahira A, Niihara K. Strctural ceramics-ceramic nanocomposites by
nanocomposites K-0, K0,1(PEO)xMoS2 (X = 0,5; 1,2). Quimica Nova. sintering method: roles of nano-size particles. Journal of the Ceramic
1998; 21(6):687-692. Society of Japan. 1992; 100(4):448-453.
16. Sternitzke M. Review: structural ceramic nanocomposites. Journal of 39. Ferroni LP, Pezzotti G, Isshiki T, Kleebe HJ. Determination of
European Ceramic Society. 1997; 17(9):1061-1082. amorphous interfacial phases in Al 2O 3/SiC nanocomposites by
computer-aided high-resolution electron microscopy. Acta Materialia. 59. Vorotilov KA, Yanovskaya MI, Turevskaya EP, Sigov AS. Sol-gel
2001; 49(11):2109-2113. derived ferroelectric thin films: avenues for control of microstructural
40. She J, Inoue T, Suzuki M, Sodeoka S, Ueno K. Mechanical properties and electric properties. Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology.
and fracture behavior of fibrous Al2O3/Sic ceramics. Journal of 1999; 16(2):109-118.
European Ceramic Society. 2000; 20(12):1877-1881. 60. Hench LL, West JK. The sol-gel process. Chemical Review. 1990;
41. Tjong SC, Wang GS. High-cycle fatigue properties of Al-based 90(1):33-72.
composites reinforced with in situ TiB2 and Al2O3 particulates. Materials 61. Ennas G, Mei A, Musinu A, Piccaluga G, Pinna G, Solinas S. Sol-gel
Science and Engineering: A. 2004; 386(1-2):48-53. preparation and characterization of Ni-SiO2 nanocomposites. Journal
42. Athawale AA, Bhagwat SV, Katre PP, Chandwadkar AJ, Karandikar P. of Non-Crystalline Solids. 1998; 232-234:587-593.
Aniline as a stabilizer for metal nanoparticles. Materials Letters. 2003; 62. Sen S, Choudharya RNP, Pramanik P. Synthesis and characterization
57(24-25):3889-3894. of nanostructured ferroelectric compounds. Materials Letters. 2004;
43. Akita H, Hattori T. Studies on molecular composite. I. Processing of 58(27-28):3486-3490.
molecular composites using a precursor polymer for poly (P-Phenylene 63. Viart N, Richard-Plouet M, Muller D, Pourroy G. Synthesis and
benzobisthiazole). Journal of Polymer Science: Part B: Polymer Physics. characterization of Co/ZnO nanocomposites: towards new perspectives
1999; 37(3):189-197. offered by metal/piezoelectric composite materials. Thin Solid Films.
44. Akita H, Kobayashi H. Studies on molecular composite. III. Nano 2003; 437(1-2):1-9.
composites consisting of poly (P-phenylene benzobisthiazole) and 64. Kundu TK, Mukherjee M, Chakravorty D, Sinha TP. Growth of
thermoplastic polyamide. Journal of European Ceramic Society. 1999;
nano-alpha-Fe2O3 in a titania matrix by the sol gel route. Journal of
37(3):209-218.
Matererials Science. 1998; 33(7):1759-1763.
45. Akita H, Kobayashi H, Hattori T, Kagawa K. Studies on molecular
65. Baiju K, Sibu CP, Rajesh K, Pillai PK, Mukundan P, Warrier KGK,
composite. II. Processing of molecular composites using copolymers
Wunderlich W. An aqueous sol-gel route to synthesize nanosized
consisting of a precursor of poly (P-phenylene benzobisthiazole) and
lanthana doped titania having an increased anatase phase stability for
aromatic polyamide. Journal of European Ceramic Society. 1999;
photocatalytic application. Materials Chemistry and Physics. 2005;
37(3):199-207.
90(1):123-127.
46. Chang JH, An YU. Nanocomposites of polyurethane with various
organoclays: thermomechanical properties, morphology, and 66. Ananthakumar S, Prabhakaran AK, Hareesh US, Manoharan P,
gas permeability. Journal of European Ceramic Society. 2002; Warrier KGK. Gel casting process For Al2O3-SiC nanocomposites
40(7):670‑677. and its creep characteristics. Materials Chemistry and Physics. 2004;
85(1):151-157.
47. Zavyalov SA, Pivkina AN, Schoonman J. Formation and characterization
of metal-polymer nanostructured composites. Solid State Ionics. 2002; 67. Sivakumar S, Sibu CP, Mukundan P, Pillai PK, Warrier KGK.
147(3-4):415-419. Nanoporous titania-alumina mixed oxides: an alkoxide free sol-gel
synthesis. Materials Letters. 2004; 58(21):2664-2669.
48. Thompson CM, Herring HM, Gates TS, Connel JW. Preparation and
characterization of metal oxide/polyimide nanocomposites. Composites 68. Warrier KGK, Anilkumar GM. Densification of mullite-SiC
Science and Technology. 2003; 63(11):1591-1598. nanocomposite sol-gel precursors by pressureless sintering. Materials
Chemistry and Physics. 2001; 67(1-3):263-266.
49. Liu TX, Phang IY, Shen L, Chow SY, Zhange WD. Morphology and
mechanical properties of multiwalled carbon nanotubes reinforced 69. Wunderlich W, Padmaja P, Warrier KGK. TEM characterization of
nylon-6 composites. Macromolecules. 2004; 37(19):7214-7222. sol-gel-processed alumina–silica and alumina–titania nano-hybrid
50. Theng BKG. The chemistry of clay-organic reactions. New York: oxide catalysts. Journal of European Ceramic Society. 2004;
Wiley; 1974. 24(2):313‑317.
51. Ogawa M, Kuroda K. Preparation of inorganic composites through 70. Ghosh NN, Pramanik P. Aqueous sol–gel synthesis of nanosized ceramic
intercalation of organoammoniumions into layered silicates. Bulletin composite powders with metal-formate precursors. Materials Science
of the Chemical Society of Japan. 1997; 70(11):2593-2618. and Engineering: C. 2001; 16(1-2):113-117.
52. Kojima Y, Usuki A, Kawasumi M, Okada A, Fukushima Y, Karauchi T, 71. Camargo PHC, Nunes GG, Friedermann GR, Evans DJ, Leigh GJ,
Kamigaito O. Mechanical properties of nylon-6-clay hybrid. Journal Tremiliosi-Filho GSEL, Zarbin AJG, Soares JF. Titanium and iron
of Materials Research. 1993; 8(5):1185-1189. oxides produced by sol-gel processing of [FeCl{Ti-2(Opri)Q}]:
structural, spectroscopic and morphological features. Materials
53. Stearns LC, Zhao J, Martin P. Harmer Processing and microstructure
Research Bulletin. 2003; 38(15):1915-1928.
development in Al2O3-SiC ‘nanocomposites’. Journal of European
Ceramic Society. 1992; 10(3):473-477. 72. Camargo PHC, Nunes GG, Friedermann GR, Evans DJ, LeighGJ,
54. Borsa CE, Brook RJ. Fabrication of Al2O3 /SiC nanocomposites using Tremiliosi-Filho GSEL, Zarbin AJG, Soares JF. Single-source precursor
a polymeric precursor for SiC. In: Hausner H, Messing GL, Horano and homometal approaches to the sol–gel synthesis of iron and titanium
S, editors. Proceedings of the International Conference of Ceramic oxides. Surface and Colloid Science. Progress in Colloid and Polymer
Processing Science and Technology; Sept. 11-14, 1994, Friedrichshafen. Science Series. 2004; 128: 221’-226. DOI: 10.1007/b97089; ISBN:
Westerville, Germany: The American Ceramic Society; 1995. 978-3-540-21247-8.
p. 653‑658. (Ceramic Transactions. Vol. 51) 73. Mathur S, Veith M, Shen H, Hufner S, Jilavi M. Structural and optical
55. Riedel R, Strecker K, Petzow G. In situ polysilane-derived silicon- properties of NdAlO3 nanocrystals embedded in an Al2O3 matrix.
carbide particulates dispersed in silicon nitride composite. Journal of Chemistry of Materials. 2002; 14(2):568-582.
the American Ceramic Society. 1989; 72(11):2071-2077. 74. Ning J, Zhang J, Pan Y, Guo J. Fabrication and mechanical properties
56. Riedel R, Seher M, Becker G. Sintering of amorphous polymer-derived of SiO2 matrix composites reinforced by carbon nanotube. Materials
Si, N and C containing composite powders. Journal of European Science and Engineering: A-Structural Materials Properties
Ceramic Society. 1989; 5(2):113-122. Microstructure and Processing. 2003; 357(1-2):392-396.
57. Riedel R, Seher M, Mayer J, Szabo D. Polymer-derived Si-based bulk 75. Xia Z, Riester L, Curtin WA, Li H, Sheldon BW, Liang J, Chang B, Xu
ceramics. Part I: Preparation, processing and properties. Journal of JM. Direct observation of toughening mechanisms in carbon nanotube
European Ceramic Society. 1995; 15(8):703-715. ceramic matrix composites. Acta Materialia. 2004; 52(4):931-944.
58. Livage J. Sol-gel processes. Current Opinon in Solid State and Materials 76. An JW, You DH, Lima DS. Tribological properties of hot-pressed
Science. 1997; 2(2):132-136. alumina–CNT composites. Wear. 2003; 255(1-6):677-681.
77. Kamalakaran R, Lupo F, Grobert N, Lozano-Castello D, Jin-Phillipp NY, 96. Chen W, Zhang J, Cai W. Sonochemical preparation of Au, Ag,
Ruhle M. In-situ formation of carbon nanotubes in an alumina-nanotube Pd/SiO2 mesoporous nanocomposites. Scripta Materialia. 2003;
composite by spray pyrolysis. Carbon. 2003; 41(14):2737-2741. 48(2):1061‑1066.
78. Jiang L, Gao L. Carbon nanotubes magnetite nanocomposites 97. Sawaguchi A, Toda K, Niihara K. Mechanical and electrical properties
from solvothermal processes: formation, characterization, and of silicon-silicon nitride-silicon carbide nanocomposite material.
enhanced electrical properties. Chemistry of Materials. 2003; Journal of the American Ceramic Society. 1991; 74(2):1142-1144.
15(14):2848‑2853. 98. Suzuki Y, Sekino T, Niihara K. Effects of ZrO2 addition on microstructure
79. Chaisan W, Yimnirun R, Ananta S. Preparation and characterization and mechanical properties of MoSi 2. Scripta Metallurgica and
of ceramic: nanocomposites in the PZT–BT system. Ceramics Materialia. 1995; 33(1):69-74.
International. 2009; 35(1):121-124. 99. Sasaki G, Suga T, Yanai T, Suganuma K, Niihara K. Microstructure of
B4C/TiB2 composite fabricated by reaction sintering of B4C and TiC.
80. Cha SI, Kim KT, Lee K, Mo CB, Hong SH. Strengthening and
Journal of the Ceramic Society of Japan 1994; 102(1184):321-325.
toughening of carbon nanotube reinforced alumina nanocomposite
fabricated by molecular level mixing process. Scripta Materialia. 100. Sakka Y, Bidinger DD, Aksay A. Processing of silicon carbide-mullite-
2005; 53(7):793-797. alumina nanocomposites. Journal of the American Ceramic Society.
1995; 78(2):479-486.
81. Balázsi CS, Kónya Z, Wéber F, Biró LP, Arató P. Preparation and
characterization of carbon nanotube reinforced silicon nitride composites. 101. Ge QL, Lei TC, Zhou Y. Microstructure and mechanical-properties
Materials Science and Engineering: C. 2003; 23(6‑8):1133‑1137. of hot-pressed Al2O3-ZrO2 ceramics prepared from ultrafine powders.
Materials Science and Technology. 1991; 7(6):490-494.
82. Chung DDL. Cement-matrix structural nanocomposites. Metals &
102. Nawa M, Sekino T, Niihara K. Fabrication and mechanical-behavior
Materials International. 2004; 10(1):55-67.
of Al2O3/Mo nanocomposites. Journal of Materials Science. 1994;
83. Lim DS, You DH, Choi HJ, Lim SH, Jang H. Effect of CNT 29(12):3185-3192.
distribution on tribological behavior of alumina-CNT composites.
103. Anya CC. Microstructural nature of strengthening and toughening in
International Conference on Wear of Materials Special Issue. 2005;
Al2O3-SiC(P) nanocomposites. Journal of Materials Science. 1999;
259(1-6):539‑544. 34(22):5557-5567.
84. Peigney A, Flahaut E, Lautent CH, Chastel F, Rousset A. Aligned 104. Baron B, Kumar CS, Le Gonidec G, Hampshire S. Comparison of
carbon nanotubes in ceramic-matrix nanocomposites prepared different alumina powders for the aqueous processing and pressureless
by high-temperature extrusion. Chemical Physics Letters. 2002; sintering of Al2O3-SiC nanocomposites. Journal of the European
352(1‑2):20‑25. Ceramic Society. 2002; 22(9-10):1543-1552.
85. Siegel RW, Chang SK, Ash BJ, Stone J, Ajayan PM, Doremus RW, 105. Timms LA, Ponton CB, Strangwood M. Processing of Al2O3/SiC
Schadler LS. Mechanical behaviour of polymer and ceramic matrix nanocomposites - Part 2: green body formation and sintering. Journal
nanocomposites. Scripta Materialia. 2001; 44(8-9):2061-2064. of the European Ceramic Society. 2002; 22(9-10):1569-1586.
86. Lee DY, Lee MH, Kim KJ, Heo S, Kim BY, Lee SJ. Effect of multiwalled 106. Mabuchi H, Tsuda H, Ohtsuka T, Matsui T, Morii K. In-situ synthesis of
carbon nanotube (M-CNT) loading on M-CNT distribution behavior Si3N4-SiC composites by reactive hot-pressing high temperatures-high
and the related electromechanical properties of the M-CNT dispersed pressures. High Temperatures-high Pressures. 1999; 31(5):499-506.
ionomeric nanocomposites. Surface and Coating Technology. 2005; 107. Weimer AW, Bordia RK. Processing and properties of nanophase In-situ
200(5-6):1920-1925. synthesis of SiC/ Si3N4 composites. Composites Part B – Engineering.
87. Laurent C, Peigney A, Dumortier O, Rousset A. Carbon nanotubes 1999; 30(7):647-655.
Fe- alumina nanocomposites. Part II: microstructure and mechanical 108. Ma RZ, Wu J, Wei BQ, Liang J, Wu DH. Processing and properties
properties of the hot-pressed composites. Journal of the European of carbon nanotubes-nano-SiC ceramic. Journal of Materials Science.
Ceramic Society. 1998; 18(14):2005-2013. 1998; 33(21):5243-5246.
88. Sinnott SB, Andrews R, Qian D, Rao AM, Mao Z, Dickey EC, 109. Zhan GD, Kuntz JD, Wan J, Mukherjee AK. Single-wall carbon
Derbyshire F. Model of carbon nanotube growth through chemical vapor nanotubes as attractive toughening agents in alumina-based
deposition. Chemical Physics Letters. 1999; 315(1-2):25-30. nanocomposites. Nature Materials. 2003; 2(1):38-42.
89. Lim DS, An JW, Lee HJ. Effect of carbon nanotube addition on the 110. Zhan GD, Kuntz JD, Wan J, Garay JE, Mukherjee AK. Electrical
tribological behavior of carbon/carbon composites. Wear. 2002; properties of nanoceramics reinforced with ropes of single-walled
252(5‑6):512-517. carbon nanotubes. Applied Physical Letters. 2003; 83(6):1228-1230.
90. Bajwa S, Rainfoth WM, Lee WE. Sliding wear behaviour of SiC-Al2O3 111. Natile MM, Glisenti A. New NiO/Co3O4 and Fe2O3/ Co3O4 nanocomposite
nanocomposites. International Conference on Wear of Materials. 2005; catalysts: synthesis and characterization. Chemistry of Materials. 2003;
259(1-6):553-561. 15(13):2502-2510.
112. Balázsi CS, Shen Z, Kónya Z, Kaztovszky ZA, Wéber F, Vértesy Z, Biró
91. Wang XT, Padture NP, Tanaka H. Contact-damage-resistant ceramic/
LP, Kiricsi I, Arató P. Processing of carbon nanotube reinforced silicon
single-wall carbon nanotubes and ceramic/graphite composites. Nature
nitride composites by spark plasma sintering. Composites Science and
Materials. 2004; 3(8):539-544.
Technology. 2005; 65(5):727-733.
92. Sealy C. Stronger by a hair - composites: glassy route to ultrahard
113. Baker C, Ismat Shah S, Hasanain SK. Magnetic behavior of iron and
ceramics: composites: uncommon behavior in ceramic composites:
iron-oxide nanoparticle/polymer composites. Journal of Magnetism
composites. Materials Today. 2004; 7(10):15-15. and Magnetic Materials. 2004; 280(2-3):412-418.
93. Tai WP, Kim YS, Kim JG. Fabrication and magnetic properties of 114. Yoon ES, Lee JS, Oh ST, Kim BK. Microstructure and sintering behavior
Al2O3/Co nanocomposites. Materials Chemistry and Physics. 2003; of W–Cu nanocomposite powder produced by thermo-chemical process.
82(2):396-400. International Journal of Refractory Metals and Hard Materials. 2002;
94. Li GJ, Huang XX, Guo JK. Fabrication, microstructure and mechanical 20(3):201-206.
properties of Al2O3/Ni nanocomposites by a chemical method. Material 115. Provenzano V, Louat NP, Imam MA, Sadananda K. Ultrafine
Research Bulletin. 2003; 38(11-12):1591-1600. superstrength materials. Nanostructured Materials. 1992; 1(1):89-94.
95. Goujon C, Goeuriot P. Solid state sintering and high temperature 116. Contreras A, Lopez, Bedolla E. Mg/TiC composites manufactured
compression properties of Al-alloy5000/AlN nanocomposites. Materials by pressureless melt infiltration. Scripta Materialia. 2004;
Science and Engineering: A. 2001; 315(1-2):180-188. 51(3):249‑253.
117. Khalid FA, Beffort O, Klotz UE, Keller BA, Gasser P, Vaucher S. 138. Xu CL, Wei BQ, Ma RZ, Liang J, Ma XK, Wu DH. Fabrication of
Study of microstructure and interfaces in an aluminium–C60 composite aluminium-carbon nanotube composites and their electrical properties.
material. Acta Materialia. 2003; 51(15):4575-4582. Carbon. 1999; 37(1):855-858.
118. Bhattacharya V, Chattopadhyay K. Microstructure and wear behaviour 139. Noguchi T, Magario A, Fuzukawa S, Shimizu S. Carbon nanotube/
of aluminium alloys containing embedded nanoscaled lead dispersoids. aluminium composites with uniform dispersion. Materials Transactions.
Acta Materialia. 2004; 52(8):2293-2304. 2004; 45(2):602-604.
119. Bhattacharya V, Chattopadhyay K. Microstructure and tribological 140. Kuzumaki T, Miyazawa K, Ichinose H, Ito K. Processing of carbon
behaviour of nano-embedded al-alloys. Scripta Materialia. 2001; nanotube reinforced aluminum composite. Journal of Materials
44(8-9):1677-1682. Research. 1998; 13(9):2445-2449.
120. Srinivasan D, Chattopadhyay K. Hardness of high strength nanocomposite 141. Yang J, Schaller R. Mechanical spectroscopy of mg reinforced with
Al–X–Zr (X=Si,Cu,Ni) alloys. Materials Science and Engineering Al2O3 short fibers and carbon nanotubes. Materials Science and
A-Structural Materials Properties Microstructure and Processing. Engineering. 2004; 370(1-2):512-515.
2004; 375-377(Special Issue):1228-1234.
142. Special feature: Tiny tubes boost for metal matrix composites. Metal
121. Branagan DJ. In: Alman DE, Newkirk JW, editors. Powder metallurgy, Powder Report. 2004; 59(7):40-43.
particulate materials for industrial applications. St. Louis: TMS
Publication; 2000. 143. Marchal Y, Delannay F, Froyen L. The essential work of fracture as
a means for characterizing the influence of particle size and volume
122. Branagan DJ, Tang Y. Developing extreme hardness (>15 GPa) in
fraction on the fracture toughness of plates of Al/SiC composites.
iron based nanocomposites. Composites Part A – Applied Science and
Scripta Materialia. 1996; 35(2):193-198.
manufacturing. 2002; 33(6):855-859.
144. Jang Y, Kim S, Lee S, Kim D, Um M. Fabrication of carbon nano-sized
123. Xiaochun Li, Yang Y, Cheng X. Ultrasonic-assisted fabrication of
fiber reinforced copper composite using liquid infiltration process.
metal matrix nanocomposites. Journal of Materials Science. 2004;
Composites Science and Technology. 2005; 65(5):781-802.
39(9):3211-3212.
145. Liu HH, Wang L, Wang A, Lou T, Ding B, Hu Z. Study of SiC/Al
124. Ying DY, Zhang DL. Processing of Cu–Al 2 O 3 metal matrix
nanocomposite materials by using high energy ball milling. Materials nanocomposites under high pressure. Nanostructured Materials. 1997;
Science and Engineering. 2000; 286(1):152-156. 9(1-8):225-228.
125. Choy KL. Chemical vapour deposition of coatings. Progress in 146. Venkatraman B, Sundararajan G. The sliding wear behaviour of Al-SiC
Materials Science. 2003; 48(2):57-170. particulate composites—I. Macrobehaviour. Acta Materialia. 1996;
44(2):451-460.
126. Joseph MC, Tsotsos C, Baker MA, Kench PJ, Rebholz C, Matthews
A, Leyl A. Characterisation and tribological evaluation of nitrogen- 147. El-Eskandarany MS. Mechanical solid state mixing for synthesizing
containing molybdenum-copper pvd metallic nanocomposite films. of SiCp/Al nanocomposites. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 1998;
Surface and Coating Technology. 2005; 190(2-3):345-356. 279(2):263-271.
127. Chow GM, Holtz RL, Pattnaik A, Edelstein AS, Schlesinger TE, 148. Pathak JP, Tiwari SN, Malhotra SL. On the wear characteristics of leaded
Cammarata RC. Alternative approach to nanocomposite synthesis by aluminum bearing alloys. Wear. 1986; 112(3-4):341-353.
sputtering. Applied Physical Letters. 1990; 56(19):1853-1855. 149. Quin D, Dickey EC, Andrews R, Rantell T. Load transfer and
128. Haubold T, Gertsman V. On the structure and properties of deformation mechanisms in carbon nanotube-polystyrene composites.
nanostructured copper-tungsten alloys. Nanostructured Materials. Applied Physical Letters. 2000; 76(20):2868-2870.
1992; 1(4):303-312. 150. Schadler LS, Giannaris SC, Ajayan PM. Load transfer in carbon
129. Holtzt RL, Provenzano V. Enhanced microhardness of copper-niobium nanotube epoxy composites. Applied Physical Letters. 1998;
nanocomposites. Nanostructured Materials. 1994; 4(2):241-256. 73(26):3842-3844.
130. Cushing BL, Kolesnichenko VL. O’Connor CJ. Recent advances in the 151. Jimenez G, Ogata N, Kawai H, Ogihara T. Structure and thermal/
liquid-phase syntheses of inorganic nanoparticles. Chemical Reviews. mechanical properties of poly (ε-caprolactone) - clay blend. Journal
2004; 104(9):3893-3946. of Applied Polymer Science. 1997; 64: 2211-2220.
131. West R, Wang Y, Goodson T. Nonlinear absorption properties in novel 152. Ogata N, Jimenez G, Kawai H, Ogihara T, Ogata N. Structure and
gold nanostructured topologies. Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 2003; thermal/mechanical properties of poly (l-lactide) – clay blend. Journal
107(15):3419-3426. of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics. 1997; 35(2):389-396.
132. Kamat PV, Flumiani M, Dawson A. Metal-metal and metal-semiconductor 153. Jeon HG, Jung HT, Lee SW, Hudson SD. Morphology of polymer
composite nanoclusters. Colloid Surface A- Physicochemical and silicate nanocomposites. Polymer Bulletin. 1998; 41(1):107-113.
Engineering Aspects. 2002; 202(2-3):269-279.
154. Aranda P, Ruiz-Hitzky E. Poly (ethylene oxide) - silicate intercalation
133. Roy SD, Chakravorty D, Agrawal DC. Magnetic properties of glass- materials. Chemistry of Materials. 1992; 4(6):1395-1403.
metal nanocomposites prepared by the sol-gel route and hot pressing.
Journal of Applied Physics. 1993; 74(7):4746-4749. 155. Greenland DJ. Adsorption of polyvinylalcohols by montmorillonite.
Journal of Colloid Science. 1963; 18(7):647-664.
134. Carpenter EE, Kumbhar A, Wiemann JA, Srikanth Wiggins HJ, Zhou
W, O’Connor CJ. Synthesis and magnetic properties of gold–iron– 156. Francis CW. Adsorption of polyvinylpyrrolidone on reference clay
gold nanocomposites. Materials Science and Engineering. 2000; minerals. Soil Science. 1973; 115(1):40-54.
286(1):81‑86. 157. Zhao X, Urano K, Ogasawara S. Adsorption of polyethylene glycol
135. Chen X, Xia J, Peng J, Li W, Xie S. Carbon-nanotube metal-matrix from aqueous solutions on monmorillonite clays. Colloid and Polymer
composites prepared by electroless plating. Composites Science and Science. 1989; 267(10):899-906.
Technology. 2000;60(2):301-306. 158. Usuki A, Kojima Y, Kawasumi M, Okada A, Fukushima Y, Kurauchi T,
136. Chen WX, Lee JY, Liu Z. The nanocomposites of carbon nanotube Kamigaito O. Synthesis of Nylon-6-clay hybrid. Journal of Materials
with Sb and SnSb 0.5 as Li-ion battery anodes. Carbon. 2003; Research. 1993; 8(5):1179-1183.
41(5):959‑966. 159. Usuki A, Kawasumi M, Kojima Y, Okada A, Kurauchi T, Kamigaito
137. Chen WX, Lee JY, Liu Z. Electrochemical lithiation and de-lithiation O. Swelling behaviour of montmorrinollitecation exchanged for
of carbon nanotube-Sn 2 Sb nanocomposites. Electrochemical Ω-amino acid by ε–Caprolactum. Journal of Materials Research.
Communications. 2002; 4(3):260-265. 1993; 8(5):1174-1178.
160. Messersmith PB, Giannelis EP. Polymer Layered Silicate 180. Evora VMF, Shukla A. Fabrication, characterization, and dynamic
Nanocomposites: in situ intercalative polymerization of ε–caprolactone behavior of polyester/TiO2 nanocomposites. Materials Science and
in layered silicates. Chemistry of Materials. 1993; 5(8):1064-1066. Engineering. 2003; 361(1-2):358-366.
161. Okamoto M, Morita S, Taguchi H, Kim YH, Kotaka T, Tateyama H. 181. Di Lorenzo ML, Errico ME, Avella M. Thermal and morphological
Synthesis and structure of smectic clay/poly(methyl methacrylate) characterization of poly (ethylene terephthalate)/calcium
and clay/polystyrene nanocomposites via in situ intercalative carbonate nanocomposites. Journal of Materials Science. 2002;
polymerization. Polymer. 2000; 41(10):3887-3890. 37(11):2351‑2358.
162. Okamoto M, Morita S, Kotaka T. Dispersed structure and ionic 182. Park SS, Bernet N, De La Roche S, Hanh HT. Processing of iron oxide-
conductivity of smectic clay/polymer nanocomposites. Polymer. 2001; epoxy vinyl ester nanocomposites. Journal of Composite Materials.
42(6):2685-2688. 2003; 37(5):465-465.
163. Yao KJ, Song M, Hourston DJ, Luo DZ. Polymer/layered clay 183. Xu X, Yin Y, Ge X, Wu H, Zhang Z. Γ-radiation synthesis of poly
nanocomposites: 2- polyurethane nanocomposites. Polymer. 2002; (acrylic acid)–metal nanocomposites. Materials Letters. 1998;
43(3):1017-1020. 37(6):354-358.
164. Messersmith PB, Giannelis EP. Synthesis and characterization of 184. Liu J, Gao Y, Wang F, Li D, Xu J. Preparation and characteristic of a
layered silicate-epoxy nanocomposites. Chemistry of Materials. 1994; new class of silica/polyimide nanocomposites. Journal of Materials
6(10):1719-1725. Science. 2002; 37(14):3085-3088.
165. Vaia RA, Giannelis EP. Lattice of polymer melt intercalation in 185. Jackson CL, Bauer BJ, Nakatani AI, Barnes JD. Synthesis of hybrid
organically modified layered silicates. Macromolecules. 1997; organic-inorganic materials from interpenetrating polymer network
30(25):7990-7999. chemistry. Chemistry of Materials. 1996; 8(3):727-733.
166. Gilmann JW. Flammability and thermal stability studies of polymer- 186. Avadhani CV, Chujo Y. Polyimide-silica gel hybrids containing metal
layered –silicate (clay) nanocomposites. Appied Clay Science. 1999; salts: preparation via the sol-gel reaction. Applied Organometalic
15(1-2):31-49. Chemistry. 1997; 11(2):153-161.
167. Vaia RA, Vasudevan S, Krawiec W, Scanlon LG, Giannelis EP. New 187. Sandler J, Shaffer MSP, Prasse T, Bauhofer W, Schulte K, Windle
polymer electrolyte nanocomposites: melt intercalation of poly AH. Development of a dispersion process for carbon nanotubes in an
(ethylene oxide) in mica-type silicates. Advanced Materials. 1995; epoxy matrix and the resulting electrical properties. Polymer. 1999;
7(2):154-156. 40(21):5967-5971.
168. Kawasumi M, Hasegawa N, Kato M, Usuki A, Okada A. Preparation and 188. Qian D, Dickey EC, Andrews R, Rantell T. Load transfer and
deformation mechanisms in carbon nanotube-polystyrene composites.
mechanical properties of polypropylene-clay hybrids. Macromolecules.
Applied Physical Letters. 2000; 76(20):2868-2870.
1997; 30(20):6333-6338.
189. Ding W, Eitan A, Fisher FT, Chen X, Dikin DA, Andrews R, Brinson
169. Vaia RA, Giannelis EP. Polymer melt intercalation in organically
LC, Schadler LS, Ruoff RS. Direct observation of polymer sheathing
modified layered silicates: model predictions and experiment.
in carbon nanotube-polycarbonate composites. Nano Letters 2003;
Macromolecules. 1997; 30(25):8000-8009.
3(11):1593-1597.
170. Tomasko DL, Han X, Liu DH, Gao W. Supercritical fluid applications in
190. Lin Y, Zhou B, Fernando KAS, Liu P, Allard LF, Sun YP. Polymeric
polymer nanocomposites. Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials
carbon nanocomposites from carbon nanotubes functionalized with
Science. 2003; 7(4-5):407-412.
matrix polymer. Macromolecules. 2003; 36(19):7199-7204.
171. Watkins JJ, Mccarthy TJ. Polymerization in supercritical fluid-swollen
191. Wong M, Paramsothy M, Xu XJ, Ren Y, Liao K. Physical
polymers: a new route to polymer blends. Macromolecules. 1994;
interactions at carbon nanotube-polymer interface. Polymer. 2003;
27(17):4845-4847. 44(25):7757‑7764.
172. Watkins JJ, Mccarthy TJ. Polymer/metal nanocomposite synthesis in 192. Koerner H, Price G, Pearce NA, Alexer M, Vaia RA. Remotely actuated
supercritical CO2. Chemistry of Materials. 1995; 7(11):1991-1994. polymer nanocomposites-stress-recovery of carbon-nanotube filled
173. Watkins JJ, Mccarthy TJ. Polymerization of styrene in supercritical thermoplastic elastomers. Nature Materials. 2004; 3(2):115-119.
CO2-swollen poly (chlorotrifluoroethylene). Macromolecules. 1995; 193. Kubayashi K, Hayashi S. Woven fabric made of shape memory polymers.
28(12):4067-4074. United States. Patent 5, 128. 1992.
174. Watkins JJ, Mccarthy TJ. Chemistry in supercritical fluid-swollen 194. Tang W, Santare MH, Advani SG. Melt processing and mechanical
polymers: direct synthesis of metal-polymer nanocomposites: Part property characterization of multi-walled carbon nanotube/high
2. Abstract of Papers of the American Chemical Society. 1995; density polyethylene (MWNT/HDPE) composite films. Carbon. 2003;
210:84‑84. 41(14):2779-2785.
175. Carrado KA, Xu LQ. In situ synthesis of polymer-clay nanocomposites 195. Andrews R, Jacques D, Minot M, Rantell T. Fabrication of
from silicate gels. Chemistry of Materials. 1998; 10(5):1440-1445. carbon multiwall nanotube/polymer composites by shear mixing.
176. Fernando W, Satyanarayana KG. Functionalization of single layers Macromolecular Materials and Engineering. 2002; 287(6):395-403.
and nanofibers: a new strategy to produce polymer nanaocomposites 196. Park SJ, Cho MS, Lim LT, Choi HJ, Jhon MS. Synthesis and dispersion
with optimized properties. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. characteristics of multi-walled carbon nanotube composites with
2005; 285(1):532-543. poly(methyl methacrylate) prepared by in-situ bulk polymerization.
177. Park AY, Kwon H, Woo AJ, Kim SJ. Layered double hydroxide surface Macromolecular Rapid Communications. 2003; 24(18):1070-1073.
modified with (3-aminopropyl) triethoxysilane by covalent bonding. 197. Maser WK, Benito AM, Callejas MA, Seeger T, Martínez MT,
Advanced Materials. 2005; 17(1):106-109. Schreiber J et al. Synthesis and characterization of new polyaniline/
178. Mbhele ZH, Salemane MG, Van Sittert CGCE, Nedeljkovic JM, nanotube composites. Materials Science and Engineering. 2003;
Djokovic V, Luyt AS. Fabrication and characterization of silver- 23(1-2):87-91.
polyvinyl alcohol nanocomposites. Chemistry of Materials. 2003; 198. Park C, Ounaies Z, Watson KA, Crooks RE, Smith JJ, Lowther SE et al.
15(26):5019-5024. Dispersion of single wall carbon nanotubes by in situ polymerization
179. Aymonier C, Bortzmeyer D, Thomann R, Lhaupt RM. Poly (methyl under sonication. Chemical Physics Letters. 2002; 364(3-4):303-308.
methacrylate)/palladium nanocomposites: synthesis and characterization 199. Philip B, Xie J, Abraham JK, Varadan VK. Polyaniline - carbon nanotube
of the morphological, thermomechanical, and thermal properties. composites: starting with phenylamino functionalized carbon nanotubes.
Chemistry of Materials. 2003; 15(25):4874-4878. Polymer Bulletin. 2005; 53(2):127-138.
200. Velasco-Santos C, Martinez-Hernandez AL, Fisher FT, Rouff R, Castaño 220. Favier V, Canova GR, Shrivastava SC, Cavaille JV. Mechanical
VM. Improvement of thermal and mechanical properties of carbon percolation in cellulose whisker nanocomposites. Polymer Engineering
nanotube composites through chemical functionalization. Chemistry Science. 1997; 37(10):1732-1739.
of Materials. 2003; 15(23):4470-4475. 221. Chazeau L, Cavaille JY, Canova G, Dendievel R, Boutherin
201. Azioune A, Peck K, Soudi B, Chehimi MM, Mccarthy GP, Armes B. Viscoelastic properties of plasticized PVC reinforced with
SP. Adsorption of human serum albumin onto polypyrrole powder cellulose whiskers. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 1999;
and polypyrrole-silica nanocomposites. Synthetic Metals. 1999; 71(11):1797‑1808.
102(1‑3):1419-1420. 222. Ogawa M, Kuroda K. Preparation of inorganic–organic nanocomposites
202. Roslaniec Z, Broza G, Schulte K. Nanocomposites based on multiblock through intercalation of organoammonium ions into layered silicates.
polyester elastomers (PEE) and carbon nanotubes (CNT). Composite Bulletinn of the Chemical Society of Japan. 1997; 70(11):2593-2618.
Interfaces. 2003; 10(1):95-102. 223. Chen L, Yang WJ, Yang CZ. Preparation of nanoscale iron and Fe3O4
203. Xia HS, Wang Q, Li KS, Hu GH. Preparation of polypropylene/carbon powders in a polymer matrix. Journal of Materials Science. 1997;
nanotube composite powder with a solid-state mechanochemical 32(13):3571-3575.
pulverization process. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 2004; 224. Lu GT, Huang Y. Synthesis of polymaleimide/silica nanocomposites.
93(1):378-386. Journal of Materials Science. 2002; 37(11):2305-2308.
204. Kim JY, Kim M, Choi JH. Characterization of light emitting devices 225. Liu SH, Qian XF, Yuan JY, Yin J, He R, Zhu ZK. Synthesis of
based on a single-walled carbon nanotube–polymer composite. Synthetic monodispersed CdSe nanocrystals in poly(styrene-alt-maleic
Metals. 2003; 139(3):565-568. anhydride) at room temperature. Materials Research Bulletin. 2003;
205. Valentini L, Biagiotti J, Kenny JJ, Santucci S. Morphological 38(8):1359‑1366.
characterization of single-walled carbon nanotubes-PP composites. 226. Trindade T, O’Brien P. A single source approach to the synthesis of CdSe
Composites Science and Technology. 2003; 63(8):1149-1153. nanocrystallites. Advanced Materials. 1996; 8(2):161-163.
206. Ramamurthy PC, Malshe AM, Harrell WR, Gregory RV, McGuire K, 227. Trindade T, Neves MC, Barros AMV. Preparation and optical
Rao AM. Polyaniline/signle-walled carbon tube composite electronic properties of CdSe/polymer nanocomposites. Scripta Materialia. 2000;
devises. Solid State Electrochemistry. 2004; 48(10-11):2019-2024. 43(6):567‑571.
207. Bharadwaj RK. Modeling the barrier properties of polymer layered 228. Vaia RA, Wagner HD. Framework for nanocomposites. Materials
silicate nanocomposites. Macromolecules. 2001; 34(26):9189-9192. Today. 2004; 7(11):32-37.
208. Kojima Y, Usuki A, Kawasumi M, Okada A, Kurauchi T, Kamigaito O. 229. Curtin WA, Sheldon BW. CNT-reinforced ceramics and metals.
Synthesis of nylon-6-clay hybrid by montmorillonite intercalated with Materials Today. 2004; 7(11):44-49.
ε-caprolactum. Journal of Polymer Science and Polymer Chemistry. 230. Thostenson ET, Chou TW. On the elastic properties of carbon nanotube-
1993; 31(7):983-986. based composites: modelling and characterization. Journal of Physics
209. Kojima Y, Usuki A, Kawasumi M, Okada A, Kurauchi T, Kamigaito O. D. Applied Physics. 2003; 36(5):573-582.
One pot synthesis of nylon-6-clay hybrid. Journal of Polymer Science 231. Thostenson ET, Chou TW. Aligned multi-walled carbon nanotube-
and Polymer Chemistry. 1993; 31(7):1755-1758 reinforced composites: processing and mechanical characterization.
210. Bourbigot S, LeBras M, Dabrowski F, Gilman JW, Kashiwagi T. PA-6 Journal of Physics D. Applied Physics. 2002; 35(16):L77-L80.
clay nanocomposite hybrid as char forming agent in intumescent 232. Tai NH, Yeh MK, Liu HH. Enhancement of the mechanical properties of
formulations. Fire and Materials. 2000; 24(4):201-208. carbon nano tube/phenolic composites using a carbon nanotube network
as the reinforcement. Carbon. 2004; 42(12-13):2774-2777.
211. Ray SS, Yamada K, Okamoto M, Ueda K. New polylactide/layered
silicate nanocomposite: a novel biodegradable material. Nano Letters. 233. Gojny FH, Wichmann MHG, Kopke U, Fiedler B, Schulte K. Carbon
2002; 2(10):1093-1096. nanotube-reinforced epoxy-composites: enhanced stiffness and fracture
toughness at low nanotube content. Composites Science and Technology.
212. Okada A, Kawasumi M, Usuki A, Kojima Y, Kurauchi T, Kamigaito
2004; 64(15):2363-2371.
O. In: Schaefer DW, Mark JE, editors. Polymer-based molecular
composites. Proceedings of the MRS Symposium; 1990; Pittsburgh. 234. Ogasawara T, Ishida Y, Ishikawa T, Yokota R. Characterization of
USA: [s.n]; 1990. p. 18-45. multi-walled carbon nanotube/phenylethynyl terminated polyimide
composites. Composites part A - Applied Science. 2004; 35(1):67-74.
213. Dabrowskii F, Bourbigot S, Delobel R, Lebras ML. Kinetic molding
of the thermal degradation of polyamide-6 nanocomposite. European 235. Giannelis EP, Krishnamoorti R, Manias E. Polymer-silica
Polymer Journal. 2000; 36(2):273-284. nanocomposites: model systems for confined polymers and polymer
blends. In: Polymers in confined environments. Book Series: Advances
214. Lee JY, Baljon ARC, Loring RF, Panagiopoulos AZ. Simulation of in polymer science. [S.L.]: [s.n.]; 1999. p. 107-147.
polymer melt intercalation in layered nanocomposites. Journal of
236. LeBaron PC, Wang Z, Pinnavaia TJ. Polymer-layered silicate
Chemical Physics. 1998; 109(23):10321-10330.
nanocomposites: an overview. Applied Clay Science. 1999;
215. Balazs AC, Singh C, Zhulina E. Modeling the interactions between 15(1‑2):11‑29.
polymers and clay surfaces through self consistent field theory.
237. Vaia RA, Price G, Ruth PN, Nguyen HT, Lichtenhan J. Polymer/layered
Macromolecules. 1998; 31(23):8370-8381.
silicate nanocompsosites as high performance ablative materials.
216. Fredrickson GH, Bicerano J. Barrier properties of oriented disk Applied Clay Science. 1999; 15(1-2):67-92.
composites. Journal of Chemical Physics. 1999; 110(4):2181-2188.
238. Biswas M, Ray SS. Recent progress in synthesis and evaluation of
217. Kuznetsov D, Balazs AC. Scaling theory for end-functionalized polymer–montmorillonite nanocomposites. New polymerization
polymers confined between two surfaces: predictions for fabricating techniques and synthetic methodologies. Book series: Advances in
polymer nanocomposites. Journal of Chemical Physics. 2000; polymer science. [S.L.]: [s.n.]; 2001. p. 167-221.
112(9):4365-4375. 239. Giannelis EP. Polymer-layered silicate nanocomposites: synthesis,
218. Manias E, Chen E, Krisnhamoorti R, Genzer J, Kramer EJ, Giannelis properties and applications. Applied Organometalic Chemistry. 1998;
EP. Intercalation kinetics of long polymers in 2 nm confinements. 12(10-11):675-680.
Macromolecules. 2000; 33(21):7955-7966. 240. Xu R, Manias E, Snyder AJ, Runt J. New biomedical poly (urethane
219. Herron N, Thorn DL. Nanoparticles: uses and relationships to molecular uera)-layered silicate nanocomposites. Macromolecules. 2001;
cluster compounds. Advanced Materials. 1998; 10(15):1173-1184. 34(2):337-339.
241. Messersmith PB, Giannelis EP. Synthesis and barrier properties of poly 263. Ray SS, Yamada K, Okamoto M, Ogami A, Ueda K. New polylactide
(ε-caprolactone)-layered silicate nanocomposites. Journal of Polymer / layered silicate nanocomposites. 3. High-performance biodegradable
Science Part A- Polymer Chemistry. 1995; 33(7):1047-1057. materials. Chemistry of Materials. 2003; 15(7):1456-1465.
242. Yano K, Usuki A, Okada A, Kurauchi T, Kamigaito O. Synthesis and 264. Nielsen LE. Models for the permeability of filled polymer systems.
properties of polimidie-clay hybrid. Journal of Polymer Science Part Journal of Macromolecular Science Part A: Pure and Applied
A- Polymer Chemistry.1993; 31(10):2493-2498. Chemistry. 1967; 1(5):929-942.
243. Gilman JW, Jackson CL, Morgan AB, Harris Jr. R, Manias E, 265. Ray SS, Yamada K, Okamoto M, Ueda K. New polylactide-layered
Giannelis EP et al. Flammability properties of polymer-layered silicate silicate nanocomposites. 2. Concurrent improvements of material
nanocomposites: propylene and polystyrene nanocomposites. Chemistry properties, biodegradability and melt rheology. Polymer. 2003;
of Materials. 2000; 12(7):1866-1873. 44(3):857-866.
244. Hori T, Kuramoto N, Tayagaya H, Karasu M, Kadokawa JI, Chiba K. 266. Lee SR, Park HM, Lim HL, Kang T, Li X, Cho WJ, Ha CS.
Preparation of conducting film composed of polyaniline and metal oxide Microstructure, tensile properties, and biodegradability of aliphatic
by sol-gel method. Journal of Materials Research. 1999; 14(1):5-7. polyester/clay nanocomposites. Polymer. 2002; 43(8):2495-2500.
245. Blumstein A. Polymerization of adsorbed monolayers. II. Thermal 267. Ray SS, Okamoto M. Biodegradable polylactide and its nanocomposites:
degradation of the inserted polymers. Journal of Polymer Science Part opening a new dimension for plastics and composites. Macromolecular
A-General papers. 1965; 3(7PA):2665-2673. Rapid Communications. 2003; 24(14):815-840.
246. Theng BKG. Formation, properties of clay–polymer complexes. 268. Okada A, Kawasumi M, Kurauchi T, Kamigaito O. Synthesis and
Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1979. characterization of a nylon 6-clay hybrid. Polymer Preprints. 1987;
247. Vaia RA, Ishii H, Giannelis EP. Synthesis and properties two- 28(2):447-448.
dimensional nanostructures by direct intercalation of polymer melts in 269. Lwan BR. Ceramic-based layer structures for biomechanical
layered silicates. Chemistry of Materials. 1993; 5(12):1694-1696. applications. Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science.
248. Passaglia E, Bertoldo M, Ciardelli F, Prevosto D, Lucchesi M. 2002; 8(3):229-235.
Evidences of macromolecular chains confinement of ethylene-propylene 270. Oriakhi CO, Farr IV, Lerner MM. Thermal characterization of poly
copolymer in organophilic montmorillonite nanocomposites. European (styrene sulfonate)/layered double hydroxide nanocomposites. Clays
Polymer Journal. 2008; 44(5):1296-1308. and Clay Minerals. 1997; 45(2):194-202.
249. Krishnamoorti R, Vaia RA, Giannelis EP. Structure and dynamics of 271. Wilson OC, Olorunyolemi T, Jaworski A, Borum L, Young D, Siriwat
polymer- layered silicate nanocomposites. Chemistry of Materials. A et al. Surface and interfacial properties of polymer-intercalated
1996; 8(8):1728-1734. layered double hydroxide nanocomposites. Appied Clay Science. 1999;
250. Hasegawa N, Kawasumi M, Kato M, Usuki A, Okada A. Preparation 15(1-2):265-279.
and mechanical properties of polypropylene-clay hybrids using a 272. Do Nascimento GM, Constantino VRL, Temperini MLA. Spectroscopic
maleic anhydride-modified polypropylene oligomer. Journal of Applied characterization of a new type of conducting polymer-clay
Polymer Science. 1998; 67(1):87-92. nanocomposite. Macromolecules. 2002; 35(20):7535-7537.
251. Lee DC, Jang LW. Preparation and characterization of PMMA–clay 273. Yang Y, Zhu ZK, Yin J, Wang XY, Qi ZE. Preparation and properties
composite by emulsion polymerization. Journal of Applied Polymer of hybrids of organo-soluble polyimide and montmorillonite with
Science. 1996; 61(7):1117-1122. various chemical surface modification methods. Polymer. 1999;
252. Noh MW, Lee DC. Synthesis and characterization of ps-clay 40(15):4407-4414.
nanocomposite by emulsion polymerization. Polymer Bulletin. 1999; 274. Lee J, Takekoshi T, Giannelis EP. Fire retardant polyetherimide
42(5):619-626. nanocomposites. Materials Research Soceity Symposium Proccedings.
253. Wang Z, Pinnavaia TJ. Nanolayer reinforcement of elastomeric 1997; 457:513-518.
polyurethane. Chemistry of Materials. 1998; 10(12):3769-3771. 275. Ray SS, Bousmina M, Okamoto K. Structure and properties of
254. Wang Z, Pinnavaia TJ. Hybrid organic-inorganic nanocomposites: nanocomposites based on poly (butylene succinate-co-adipate) and
exfoliation of magadiite nanolayers in an elastomeric epoxy polymer. organically modified montmorillonite. Macromolecular Materials and
Chemistry of Materials. 1998; 10(7):1820-1826. Engineering. 2005; 290(8):759-768.
255. Yano K, Usuki A, Okada A. Synthesis and properties of polyimide-clay 276. Morgan AB, Harris RH, Kashiwagi T, Chyall LJ, Gilman JW.
hybrid films. Journal of Polymer Science and Polymer Chemistry. 1997; Flammability of Polystyrene Layered Silicate (Clay) Nanocomposites:
35(11):2289-2294. Carbonaceous Char Formation. Fire and Materials 2002; 26
256. Liu LM, Qi ZN, Zhu XG. Studies on nylon 6/clay nanocomposites by (6):247‑253.
melt-intercalation process. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 1999; 277. Scherer C. PA film grade with improved barrier properties for flexible
71(7):1133-1138. food packaging applications. Proceedings of the 99th New Plastics;
257. Fornes TD, Yoon PJ, Keskkula H, Paul DR. Nylon 6 nanocomposites: the 1999 Feb 2-4; London.
effect of matrix molecular weight. Polymer. 2001; 42(25):9929-9940. 278. Kim JW, Kim SG, Choi JH, Jhon MS. Synthesis and electrorheological
258. Oakada A, Usuki A. The chemistry of polymer-clay hybrids. Materials properties of polyaniline-na+-montmorillonite suspensions.
Science and Engineering. 1995; 3(2):109-115. Macromolecular Rapid Communications. 1999; 20(8):450-452.
259. Laus M, Francesangeli O, Sandrolini F. New hybrid nanocomposites 279. Lan T, Kavitatna PD, Pinnavia TJ. On the nature of polyimide clay
based on an organophilic clay and poly (styrene-b-butadiene) copolymers. hybrid composites. Chemistry of Materials. 1994; 6(5):573-575.
Journal of Materials Research. 1997; 12(11):3134‑3139. 280. Mohanty AK, Drzal LT, Misra M. Nano reinforcement of Bio-based
260. Becker O, Varley R, Simon G. Morphology, thermal relaxations and polymers - The Hope and The Reality. (Presented at 225th ACS National
mechanical properties of layered silicate nanocomposites based upon Meeting, New Orleans, March 2003, U665-665, Abstract: 33-PMSE).
high-functionality epoxy resins. Polymer. 2002; 43(16):4365-4373. Polymeric Materials Science & Engineering. 2003; 88: 60-61.
261. Wang S, Long C, Wang X, Li Q, Qi Z. Synthesis and properties of 281. Dutta A, Das D, Grilli ML, Di Bartolomeo E, Traversa E, Chakravorty
silicone rubber/organomontmorillonite hybrid nanocomposites. Journal D. Preparation of sol-gel nano-composites containing copper oxide
of Applied Polymer Science. 1998; 63(8):1557-1561. and their gas sensing properties. Journal of Sol - Gel Science and
262. Zhu J, Morgan AB, Lamelas FJ, Wilkie CA. Fire properties of Technology. 2003; 26(1-3):1085-1094.
polystyrene-clay nanocomposites. Chemistry of Materials. 2001; 282. Ghose S, Watson KA, Delozier DM, Working DC, Siochi EJ, Connell
13(10):3774-3780. JW. Incorporation of multi-walled carbon nanotubes into high
temperature resin using dry mixing techniques. Composites part A - 302. Srivastava D, Wei C, Cho K. Nanomechanics of carbon nanotubes and
Applied Science and Manufacturing. 2006; 37(3):465-475. composites. Applied Mechanics Review. 2003; 56(2):215-230.
283. Lijie CI, Jinbo B. The reinforcement role of carbon nanotubes in epoxy 303. Veith M, Mathur S, Lecerf N, Bartz K, Heintz M, Huch V. Synthesis of
composites with different matrix stiffness. Composites Science and a NdAlO3/Al2O3 ceramic-ceramic composite by single-source precursor
Technology. 2006; 66(3-4):599-603. CVD. Chemistry of Materials. 2000; 12(2):271-274.
284. Xu YS, Ray G, Abdel-Magid B. Thermal behavior of single-walled 304. Veith M, Mathur S, Shen H, Lecerf N, Huffner S, Jilavi M. Single-step
carbon nanotube polymer–matrix composites. Composites part A - preparation of oxide-oxide nanocomposites: chemical vapor synthesis
Applied Science and Manufacturing. 2006; 37(1):114-121. of LnAlO3/Al2O3 (Ln = Pr, Nd) thin films. Chemistry of Materials.
2001; 13(11):4041-4052.
285. Lucas M, Young RJ. Raman spectroscopic study of the effect of
strain on the radial breathing modes of carbon nanotubes in epoxy/ 305. Voevodin AA, Zabinski JS. Nanocomposite and nanostructured
SWNT composites. Composites Science and Technology. 2004; tribological materials for space applications. Composites Science and
64(15):2297‑2302. Technology. 2005; 65(5):741-748.
286. Shofner ML, Rodríguez –Macías FJ, Vaidyanathan R, Barrera EV. 306. Meda L, Marra G, Galfetti L, Inchingalo S, Severini F, De Luca L.
Single wall nanotube and vapor grown carbon fiber reinforced polymers Nano-composites for rocket solid propellants. Composites Science and
processed by extrusion freeform fabrication. Composites Part A – Technology. 2005; 65(5):769-773.
Applied Science and manufacturing. 2003; 34(12):1207-1217. 307. Bafna A, Beaucage G, Mirabella F, Mehta S. 3D hierarchical
287. Bai JB, Allaoui A. Effect of the length and the aggregate size of orientation in polymer-clay nanocomposite films. Polymer. 2003;
mwnts on the improvement efficiency of the mechanical and electrical 44(4):1103‑1115.
properties of nanocomposites: experimental investigation. Composites 308. Bafna A, Beaucage G, Mirabella F, Mehta S. Shear induced orientation
Part A – Applied Science and manufacturing. 2003; 34(8):689-694. and associated property enhancement in polymer/clay nanocomposites.
288. Hu Y, Jang I, Sinnott SB. Modification of carbon nanotube-polystyrene Proceedings Nanocomposites. 2002 Sept. 23-25; San Diego. USA:
matrix composites through polyatomic-ion beam deposition: predictions ECM Publication.
from molecular dynamics simulations. Composites Science and 309. Lange FF. Effect of microstructure on strength of si3n4-sic
Technology. 2003; 63(11):1663-1669. composite system. Journal of the American Ceramic Society. 1973;
56(9):445‑450.
289. Hussain M, Simon GP. Fabrication of phosphorus-clay polymer
nanocomposites for fire performance. Journal of Materials Science 310. Becher PF. Microstructural design of toughened ceramics. Journal of
Letters. 2003; 22(21):1471-1475. the American Ceramic Society. 1991; 74(2):255-269.
290. Frankl SJV, Harik VM, Odegard GM, Brenner DW, Gates TS. The 311. Harmer M, Chan HM, Miller GA. Unique opportunities for
stress–strain behavior of polymer–nanotube composites from molecular microstructural engineering with duplex and laminar ceramic
dynamics simulation. Composites Science and Technology. 2003; composites. Journal of the American Ceramic Society. 1992;
63(11):1655-1661. 75(2):1715-1728
291. Haque A, Ramasetty A. Theoretical study of stress transfer in carbon 312. Nanotechnology information by application. Available from: <http://
nanotube reinforced polymer matrix composites. Composites Structure. www.azonano.com/Applications.asp>. Access in: 20 Nov. 2008.
2005; 71(1):68-77. 313. Dresselhaus MS, Dresslhaus G, Eklund PC. Science of fullerenes: carbon
292. Karger-Kocsis J, Zhang Z. In: Palta Calleja JF, Michler G, editors. nanotubes. San Diego: Academic Press; 1996.
Mechanical properties of polymers based nano structure morphology. 314. Nalwa HS. Handbook of nanostructured materials and technology.
New York: Marcel Dekker; 2004. New York: Academic Press; 2000.
293. Merkulov VI, Lowndes DH, Wei YY, Eres G, Voelkl E. Patterned growth 315. Dresselhaus MS, Dresslhaus G, Avouris P. Carbon nanotubes: synthesis,
of individual and multiple vertically aligned carbon nanofibers. Applied structure, properties and applications. Berlin: Springer Verlag; 2001.
Physical Letters. 2000; 76(24):3555-3557. 316. Ajayan PM, Schadler L, Braun PV. Nanocomposite science and
294. Endo M, Kim YA, Hayashi T, Fukai Y, Oshida K, Terronnes M et al. technology. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH, Verlag Gmbh & Co. KgaA;
Structural characterization of cup-stacked-type carbon nanofibers 2003.
with an entirely hollow core. Applied Physical Letters. 2002; 317. Alpha Gary. Nanotubes of advanced polymer products. Plastics,
80(7):1267‑1269. Additives and Compounding. 2003; 5(4):12.
295. Endo M, Kim YA, Ezaka M, Oshida K, Yanagisawa T, Dresselhaus MS. 318. Agnihotri S, Rostam-Abadi M, Rood MJ. Temporal changes in nitrogen
Selective and efficient impregnation of metal nanoparticles on cup- adsorption properties of single-walled carbon nanotubes. Carbon. 2004;
stacked-type carbon nanofibers. Nano Letters. 2003; 3(6):723-726. 42(12-13):2699-2710.
296. Finegan IC, Tibbetts GG, Glasgow DG. Surface treatment for improving 319. Belin T, Epron F. Characterization methods of carbon nanotubes: a
the mechanical properties of carbon nanofiber/thermoplastic composites. review. Materials Science and Engineering. 2005; 119(2):105-118.
Journal of Materials Science. 2003; 38(16):3485-3490. 320. Dresselhaus MS, Dresselhaus G, Saito R, Jorio A. Raman spectroscopy
297. Finegan IC, Tibbetts GG, Gibson RF. Modeling and characterization of of carbon nanotubes. Physics Report - Review Section of Physics Letters.
damping in carbon nanofiber/polypropylene composites. Composites 2005; 409(2):47-99.
Science and Technology. 2003; 63(11):1629-1635. 321. Serp P, Corrias M, Kalck P. Carbon nanotubes and nanofibers in
298. Ma HA, Zeng JJ, Realff ML, Kumar S, Schiraldi DA. Processing, structure, catalysis. Appied Catalysis. A-General. 2003; 253(2):337-58.
and properties of fibers from polyester/carbon nanofiber composites. 322. Penn SG, He L, Natan MJ. Nanoparticles for bioanalysis. Current
Composites Science and Technology. 2003; 63(11):1617‑1628. Opinion in Chemical Biology. 2003; 7(5):609-615.
299. Sandler J, Windle AH, Werner P, Altstädt V, Es MV, Shaffer MSP. 323. Darkrim FL, Malbrunot P, Tartaglia GP. Review of hydrogen storage
Carbon-nanofibre-reinforced poly (ether ether ketone) fibres. Journal by adsorption in carbon nanotubes. Internation Journal of Hydrogen
of Materials Science. 2003; 38(10):2135-2141. energy. 2002; 27(2):193-202.
300. Valentini L, Puglia D, Frulloni E, Armentano I, Kenny JM, Santucci 324. Kupfer M. Electronic properties of carbon nanostructures. Surface
S. Dielectric behavior of epoxy matrix/single-walled carbon nanotube Science Reports. 2001; 42(1-2):1-74.
composites. Composites Science and Technology. 2004; 64(1):23-33. 325. Roche S. Carbon nanotubes: exceptional mechanical and electronic
301. Qian D, Wagner GJ, Liu WK, Yu MF, Ruoff RS. Mechanics of carbon properties. Annales de Chimie – Science des Materiaux. 2000;
nanotubes. Applied Mechanics Review. 2002; 55(6):495-533. 25(7):529-532.
326. Rao CNR, Seshadri R, Govindaraj A, Sen R. Fullerenes, nanotubes, 346. Garces JM, Moll DJ, Bicerano J, Fibiger R, McLeod DG. Polymeric
onions and related carbon structures. Materials Science and nanocomposites for automotive applications. Advanced Materials.
Engineering. 1995; 15(6):209-262. 2000; 12(23):1835-1839.
327. Hammel E, Tang X, Trampert M, Schmitt T, Mauthner K, Eder A, 347. Leaversuch R. Nanocomposites Broaden Roles in Automotive, Barrier
Pötschke P. Carbon nanofibers for composite applications. Carbon. Packaging. Available from: <http://www.plastictechnology.com>.
2004; 42(5-6):1153-1158. [Online Feature article from Plastics technology]. Access in: 20 Nov.
328a. Byron Pipes R, Hubert P. Helical carbon nanotube arrays: mechanical 2008.
properties. Composites Science and Technology. 2002; 62(3): 348. Patrick Ponticel. Material innovations: GM the big winner in plastics.
419‑428. Automotive Engineering International Online: Material Innovations.
328b. Byron Pipes R, Hubert P. Helical carbon nanotube arrays: Available from: http://www.sae.org/automag/material/01-2002/. Access
thermal expansion. Composites Science and Technology. 2003; in: 10 March 2009.
63(11):1571‑1579. 349. Nanocomposites: enhancing value in the global plastics industry 2005.
329. Salvetat-Delmotte JP, Rubio A. Mechanical properties of Available from: http://www.principia consulting.com/ publishing/PDF/
carbon nanotubes: a fiber digest for beginners. Carbon. 2002; brochure_Nanocomposites.pdf. Access in: 10 March 2009.
40(10):1729‑1734. 350. Polymer nanocomposites for packaging applications. Available from:
330. Terrones M, Jorio A, Endo M, Rao AM, Kim YA, Hayashi T et al. New http://www.natick.army.mil soldier/media /fact/food/PolyNano.htm.
direction in nanotube science. Materials Today. 2004; 7(10):30-45. Access in: 10 March 2009.
331. Sinnott SB, Andrews R. Carbon nanotubes: synthesis, properties, and 351. Nanocomposite. Available from: www.fortunecity.com/oasis/
applications. Critical Reviews in Solid State and Materials Science. labreya/163/nanocomposite.html. Access in: 10 March 2009.
2001; 26(3):145-249. 352. Holehonnur H. Private communication. (Oct. 2006).
332. Cohen ML. Nanotubes, nanoscience, and nanotechnology. Materials 353. Malinauskas A, Malinauskiene J, Ramanavicius A. Conducting
Science and Engineering. 2001; 15(1-2):1-11. polymer-based nanostructurized materials: electrochemical aspects.
333. Ajayan PM. Carbon nanotubes: novel architecture in nanometer space. Nanotechnology. 2005; 16(10):R51-R62.
Progress of Crystal Growth and Characterization of Materials. 1997; 354. Ke Z, Bai YP. Improve the gas barrier property of pet film with
34(1-4):37-51. montmorillonite by in situ interlayer polymerization. Materials Letters.
334. Chirila V, Marginean G, Brandl W. Effect of the oxygen plasma 2005; 59(27):3348-3351.
treatment parameters on the carbon nanotubes surface properties. 355. Marosfoi B, Matko S, Anna P, Marosi G. Fire retarded polymer
Surface and Coating Technology. 2005; 200(1-4):548-555. nanocomposites. Current Applied Physics. 2006; 6(2):259-261.
335. Gupta VK, Pangannaya NB. Carbon nanotubes: bibliometric analysis 356. Zammarano M, Franeschi M, Bellayer S, Gilman JW, Mriani S.
of patents. World Patent Information. 2000; 22(3):185-189. Preparation and flame resistance properties of revolutionary self-
336. Wypych F. In: Wypych F, Satyanarayana KG, editors. Clay surfaces: extinguishing epoxy nanocomposites based on layered double
fundamentals, applications. Amsterdam: Academic Press; 2004. hydroxides. Polymer. 2005; 46(22):9314-9328.
337. Verpek S. Superhard and functional nanocomposites formed by self- 357. Bourbigot S, Devaux E, Flambard X. Flammability of polyamide-6/
organization in comparison with hardening of coatings by energetic clay hybrid nanocomposite textiles. Polymer Degradation and Stability.
ion bombardment during their deposition (Invited Paper Int. Conf on 2002; 75(2):397-402.
Nanomaterials and Nanotechnologies). Reviews on Advanced Materials 358. Schubel PJ, Johnson MS, Warrior NA, Rudd CD. Characterisation of
Science. 2003; 5(1):6-16. thermoset laminates for cosmetic automotive applications. Part III:
338. Cao Y, Irwin PC, Younsi K. The future of nanodielectrics in the electrical Shrinkage control via nanoscale reinforcement. Composites Part A –
power industry. IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Applied Science and manufacturing. 2006; 37(10):1757-1772.
Insulation. 2004; 11(5):797-807. 359. Schubel PJ, Warrior NA, Kendall KN, Rudd CD. Part III: Shrinkage
339. Jilek M, Cselle T, Holubar P, Mosrtein M, Verpek-Huijman MCJ, control via nanoscale reinforcement. Composites Part A – Applied
Verpek S. Development of novel coating technology by vacuum arc with Science and manufacturing. 2006; 37(10):1734-1746.
rotating cathodes for industrial production of Nc-(Al1-xTix) N/A-Si3N4 360. Schubel PJ, Parsons AJ, Lester EH, Warrior NA, Rudd CD.
super hard nanocomposite coatings for dry, hard machining. Plasma Characterisation of thermoset laminates for cosmetic automotive
Chemistry and, Plasma Processing. 2004; 24(4):493-510. applications. Part I – Surface Characterisation. Composites Part A –
340. Breuer O, Sunderraj U. Big returns from small fibers: a review of Applied Science and manufacturing. 2006; 37(10):1747-1756.
polymer/carbon nanotube composites. Polymer Composites. 2004; 361. Lan T, Cho J, Liang Y, Qian J, Peter M. Applications of nanomer
25(6):630-645. in nanocomposites: from concept to reality. Available from:
341. Terrones M. Science and technology of the twenty-first century: <http://www.nanocor.com / tech_papers/ nanocomposite2001.pdf>.
synthesis, properties, and applications of carbon nanotubes. Annual Access in: 20 Nov. 2008
Review of Materials Research. 2003; 33:419-501. DOI: 10.1146/ 362. Presting H, Konig U. Future nanotechnology developments for
annurev.matsci.33.012802.100255. automotive applications. Materials Science and Engineering: C. 2003;
342. Nazar LF, Zhang Z, Zinkweg D. Insertion of poly (para phenylenevinylene) 23(6-8):737-741.
in layered MoO3. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 1992; 363. Caroline E. Auto applications drive commercialization of nanocomposites.
114(15):6239-6240. Plastics, Additives, Compounding. 2002; 4(11):30-33.
343. Vassilliou JK, Ziebarth RP, Disalvo FJ. Preparation of a novel polymer 364. Swearingen C, Macha S, Fitch A. Leashed ferrocenes at clay surfaces:
blend of poly (ethylene oxide) and the inorganic polymer (Mo3Se3-)- potential applications for environmental catalysis. Journal of Molecular
infinity - infrared-absorption of thin-films. Chemistry of Materials. Catalysis A - Chemical. 2003; 199(1-2):149-160.
1990; 2(6):738-741. 365. Fischer H. Polymer nanocomposites: from fundamental research to
344. Beecroft LL, Ober CK. Nanocomposite materials for optical specific applications. Materials Science and Engineering: C. 2003;
applications. Chemistry of Materials. 1997; 9(6):1302-1307. 23(6-8):763-772.
345. Cão G, Garcia MF, Aleala M, Burgess LF, Mallouk TE. Chiral molecular 366. Avella M, De Vlieger JJ, Errico ME, Fischer S, Vacca P, Volpe MG.
recognition in intercalated zirconium phospate. Journal of the American Biodegradable starch/clay nanocomposite films for food packaging.
Chemical Society. 1992; 114(19):7574-7575. Applications Food Chemistry. 2005; 93(3):467-474.
367. Hay JN, Shaw SJ. Nanocomposites: properties and applications. 374. Downing-Perrault A. Polymer nanocomposites are the future. Available
Available from: <http://www.azom.com/details.asp?articleid=921>. from: <http://www.iopp.org/ files/nanostructures.pdf?pageid= pageid>.
Access in: 20 Nov. 2008. Access in: 20 Nov. 2001.
368. Hedicke K, Wittich H, Mehler C, Gruber F, Altstädt V. Crystallisation 375. Alan Ross Machinery Corporation. [Online]. Available from:
<http://www.americanrecycler.com/0606 Polymer.shtml>. Access in:
behaviour of polyamide-6 and polyamide-66 nanocomposites.
2008 Nov. 20.
Composites Science and Technology. 2006; 66(3-4):571-575.
376. South East Asia leads global polymer markets. In: South East Asian
369. Vlasveld DPN, Groenewold J, Bersee HEN, Picken SJ. Moisture Plastics Industry Report. Additives for Polymers. 2004; 5(12):10-12.
absorption in polyamide-6 silicate nanocomposites and its influence on 377. Nanocomposites to 2011 - Market Research, Market Share, Market .
the mechanical properties. Polymer. 2005; 46(26):12567-12576. Available from: http:// www.freedoniagroup.com /Nanocomposites.
370. Veprek S, Martiza GJ, Veprek-Heijman MGJ, Karvankova P, Prochazka html - 26k. Access in: 10 March 2009.
J. Different approaches to superhard coatings and nanocomposites. Thin 378. Huang ZM, Zhang YZ, Kotaki M, Ramakrishnan S. A review on polymer
Soild Films. 2005; 476(1):1-29. nanofibers by electrospinning and their applications in nanocomposites.
Composites Science and Technology. 2003; 63(15):2223-2253.
371. Argonne National Laboratory. Nanocomposites and organoclays.
Chicago: The University of Chicago; 2003. Available from: 379. Ashby MF. Materials selection in mechanical design. Oxford: Pergamon
Press; 1992.
http://www.anl.gov/techtransfer/pdf/Nanocomposite4-7-03.pdf. Access
in: 10 March 2009. 380. Callister WD. Materials science & engineering: an introduction. New
York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 1997-2004.
372. Lownsdale G. Nanocomposites in the automotive industry - November
381. FEI Sponsors 2006 Safer Nano Conferenc e. Available from:
2004. Available from: Nanocomposites/Market Trends.htm Access in:
http://www.cpd.ogi.edu/coursespecific.asp?pam=2003. Access in: 10
8 June 2005. March 2009.
373. Sourcebook: High-Performance Composites: Composites Technology: 382. Impacts of Manufactured Nanomaterials on Human Health and the
Publisher Info. Available from: <http://www.compositesworld.com/hpc/ Environment. Available from: <http://es.epa.gov/ncer/rfa/current/2003_
issues/2004/November/619>. nano.html>. Access in: 20 Nov. 2008.
View publication stats

Nanocomposites: Synthesis, Structure, Properties and New Application Opportunities

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Nanocomposites: Synthesis, Structure, Properties and New Application Opportunities

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Nanocomposites: Synthesis, Structure, Properties and New Application Opportunities

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

Nanocomposites: Synthesis, Structure, Properties and New Application

Article in Materials Research · March 2009

Pedro HC Camargo K.G. Satyanarayana

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Chemistry of soil View project

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

Nanocomposites: Synthesis, Structure,

Pedro Henrique Cury Camargo, Kestur Gundappa Satyanarayana*, Fernando Wypych

Departamento de Química, Centro Politécnico, Universidade Federal do Paraná,

Received: November 24, 2008; Revised: February 10, 2009

Keywords: composites, layered compounds, polymers, metals, ceramics

be deployed mechanically or by inflation into a large ultra-lightweight 2. Processing of Nanocomposites

Table 3a. Processing methods for ceramic nanocomposites.

Table 3b. Advantages and limitations of ceramic nanocomposite processing methods.

Table 3c. Processing methods for ceramic-CNT nanocomposites.

A-Al2O3 + B-SiC A-Al2O3 + polymer (polycarbosilane)

Ultrasonic bath Coated A-Al2O3 powder

Drying under infrared lamp Pyrolysis at 1500 °C: SiC nanoparticles

Al2O3/SiC nanocomposite Al2O3/SiC nanocomposite

Table 4a. Processing methods for metal-based nanocomposite systems.

Table 4c. Processes for preparing metal-CNT nanocomposite systems.

Silicate layer In the case of nanocomposites containing layered reinforcements,

Table 5a. Processing methods for polymer-based nanocomposite systems.

Table 5b. Advantages and limitations of polymer-based nanocomposite processing methods.

Table 5c. Processing methods for polymer-CNT nanocomposite systems.

Chemical preparation Electrochemical preparation

to look into these aspects including use of simulation and modelling

Table 7. Properties of Carbon Nanotubes30,313-318,335.

B4C/TiB2, - 99 Properties/Material Si3N4/SiC Si3N4/SiC

Table 9. Properties of Al O /SiC nano- and microcomposites

Properties/Material Al2O3/SiCp Al2O3/SiCp

5.00 k 1.0.2.6 4 Mm 11 5 k 0.1.0.8 0.2 Mm

(a) (b) (c)

guras - Materials Research SiC

(Roman), tamanho 8. Intragranular SiC

guras - Materials Research

(Roman), tamanho 8. SiC

higher than 5% cause decrease in these two properties. At 5 vol. %,

2400 0.6 3.0

Table 12. Examples of metal nanocomposites and their properties.

Table 14. Properties of Al/SiC nano- and microcomposites145-147.

In the case of Sn2Sb/CNT nanocomposites, higher specific capacity

Furthermore, agglomerates of carbon nanotubes can be found at the

Fracture toughness (MPa-m1/2)

Table 15. Examples of polymer-matrix nanocomposites and their properties18,25,26,180,184.

examples of tensile stress in different nanocomposite systems. Ac-

Table 16. Chemical formulae of 2:1 phyllosilicates [reproduced from refer-

107 1.5 Synthetic mica

Relative permeability coefficient

pas deverá ter 1 ponto de Stroke.

3.3.3. Polymer-nanofibre / CNT nanocomposites

systematic studies on the dispersion and adhesion aspects, considering

Table 22. Potential applications of metal nanocomposite systems.

Table 23. Potential applications of polymer nanocomposite systems.

Acknowledgements 17. Peigney A, Laurent CH, Flahaut E, Rousset A. Carbon nanotubes in

View publication stats

You might also like