ExponentialRoadmap 1.5 20190919 Single-Pages

SCALING 36 SOLUTIONS TO
HALVE EMISSIONS BY 2030
VERSION 1.5, 2019.

Lead authors Complete citation Published 19 September 2019
Johan Falk J. Falk, O. Gaffney, A. K. Bhowmik, P. Bergmark, This is a co-designed report. We have put together
Future Earth, Stockholm Resilience Centre, V. Galaz, N. Gaskell, S. Henningsson, M. Höjer, a multidisciplinary team representing academia,
Internet of Planet L. Jacobson, K. Jónás, T. Kåberger, D. Klingenfeld, business and NGOs – from energy specialists, data
J. Lenhart, B. Loken, D. Lundén, J. Malmodin, modellers, ICT analysts and urban researchers
Owen Gaffney
T. Malmqvist, V. Olausson, I. Otto, A. Pearce, E. Pihl, to exponential strategists, journalists, editors,
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research,
T. Shalit, Exponential Roadmap 1.5. Future Earth. designers and data visualisers. The lead partners
Stockholm Resilience Centre
Sweden. (September 2019). of this edition of the Exponential Roadmap are
– Future Earth, WWF, Ericsson, KTH Royal Institute of
Technology, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact
All authors and contributors are listed on pages
Research, Stockholm Resilience Centre, Sitra,
169–171.
Mission 2020 and Internet of Planet.
Lead partners
Supporting partners
LET’S HALVE
GLOBAL
EMISSIONS BY
“The next few years are
probably the most important
in our history.”
Debra Roberts
Co-Chair of IPCC Working Group II
WWW.EXPONENTIALROADMAP.ORG 5
CONTENTS
06 Foreword 114
SCALING THE
10 Executive summary TRANSFORMATION
18 About this report 116
Cities
122
Climate leadership
20
MEETING THE 1.5°C 130
Policies and targets
CLIMATE AMBITION 138
Open data for
climate action
46
TRANSFORMING 142
Financing the transition
SECTORS 150
Exponential technologies
48
Energy supply and solutions
58
Industry
68
Digital industry 159
FINAL WORDS
76
Buildings
84
Transport 160
References
94
Food consumption 169
Contributors
104
Nature-based solutions 172
Image credits
6 EXPONENTIAL ROADMAP 1.5
F O R E WO R D
We need a vision for a world free These five forces are aligning once more. We are at the beginning of the
mother of all transformations to stabilise Earth’s temperature at 1.5°C.
from fossil-fuels and a pathway The Fridays For Future movement and Extinction Rebellion have exploded
to achieve it. As co-chair of the onto the scene in the last twelve months and are changing how we talk about
United Nations Climate Action climate. More countries are discussing climate emergency declarations,
Summit’s ambition advisory group and goals to reach net zero by 2050 or earlier. Businesses are calling for
stronger legislation and investors are demanding climate-risk disclosure.
I welcome this report because it Now zero-carbon technologies outcompete fossil-fuels and this is killing
provides just that. old tech. And finally, science is highlighting the colossal risks of inaction,
and the equally huge opportunities from a fast transformation. This will deliver
Our history is defined by momentous societal energy and food security, cleaner cities, less pollution, healthier diets and
transformations: the industrial revolution, the economic growth.
women’s vote, civil rights, the end of apartheid
in South Africa and the Green Revolution. Major leaps forward are driven by “Meeting the 1.5°C Climate Ambition” is part of the second Exponential
disruption from a combination of social movements, government policies, Roadmap. Together they articulate how far we have come and how far we need
market confidence, new technologies and science. to go. Step by step, they chart how the world can move from incremental to
exponential action – doubling the number of companies, cities and countries
acting on climate, then doubling again and again. These are the exponential
strategies now needed to cut emissions 50% by 2030 or earlier, then doing
it again by 2040 and again by 2050. This is the carbon law pathway and you
will be hearing a lot about it in these pages.
“Progress must accelerate
and governments must drive Along this journey we also need to store more carbon by protecting forests
and peatlands and planting more trees on a truly unprecedented scale.
it. First by declaring a goal We will need to turn agriculture from a source of carbon to a giant store,
but this will enhance soils and improve crop yields. And we will need to protect
of net zero emissions by 2050 Earth’s remaining wildernesses – the oceans and land that safely store half of our
carbon dioxide emissions and shelter our biodiversity. This report highlights how:
at the latest. Then adopting
a carbon law pathway to About 56% of potential emissions in 2030 could be reduced relatively
easily with economically attractive solutions that can scale rapidly. This
reach the goal.” jumps to 64% if we use promising technologies that are unproven at scale.
The energy sector has recently reached a tipping point where wind I see all evidence that social and economic
and solar outcompete fossil-fuels in most regions of the world. tipping points are aligning. We can now say
The end may well be nigh for coal. Oil and gas will not be far behind. the next decade has the potential to see the
Expect the unexpected. fastest economic transition in history. The 2019
Exponential Roadmap is an excellent guide for
We should not assume energy demand must keep rising. Energy demand the necessary journey to net zero emissions.
can be reduced a phenomenal 40% while still providing the same quality
of life and services as today. What’s more, people in developing economies Christiana Figueres
can access the same opportunities. Former head of the United Nations
Framework Convention on Climate Change,
And finally, nature-based climate solutions – planting trees and protecting founder of Mission 2020
peatlands – have the potential to become vast stores of carbon.
Solutions are scaling fast. More people are demanding healthier diets with
The remaining carbon budget for a 1.5°C
lower carbon footprints. Major vehicle manufacturers have announced
future is falling 10% each year we fail to act.
plans to phase out fossil-fuels from light vehicles and investors are gaining
We should be nervous. But the window of
confidence in alternatives to fossil-fuels. But progress must accelerate and
opportunity is still open. While this scale of
governments must drive it. First by declaring a goal of net zero emissions by
transformation is unprecedented, the speed
2050 at the latest. Then adopting a carbon law pathway to reach the goal.
is not. We hope the 2019 Exponential Roadmap
provides a useful compass.
All this points to the potential for the 2020s to see the fastest economic
transition in history. This is the future we all want.
Johan Rockström
Director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate
Manuel Pulgar-Vidal
Impact Research, Germany and co-chair of
Leader of WWF’s global
Future Earth
climate and energy practice
Every day we get reminders of the urgency Understanding where we are and how far
of climate action. Our experiences with we still need to go to tackle climate change,
record temperatures, sea ice melts and is the foundation for achieving our common
widespread wildfires give us a sense of the exponential action plan. We have the vision,
changes underway. And the science provides we know what to focus on. Now we need to
an increasingly clear picture of the dangers accelerate the efforts of civil society, business,
ahead. This report shows there are solutions cities and people and make sure the transition
for businesses and governments thanks to the is fair and brings us well-being and a sustainable
combination of science and ingenuity. We have future. This is the responsibility of us all.
the tools to drive the transformations needed to
tackle the climate crisis. Let’s use them. Mikko Kosonen
President, Sitra
Amy Luers
Executive Director, Future Earth
All universities have a responsibility to support
exponential climate work. KTH Royal Institute
As a sustainability pioneer, we have been of Technology do this through leadership in
both an advocate of climate action and research, in education and in cooperation with
investing in research and development of other parts of society. Thus, we are dedicated
climate solutions. We believe leveraging to stimulating new ways of thinking about
technology, such as digitalisation and 5G, society and about how these can support
will be fundamental to halve emissions every climate targets and the SDGs.
decade. Ericsson have cut our own emissions
by 50% and are working to meet further Sigbritt Karlsson
reductions. We have demonstrated solutions President, KTH Royal Institute of Technology
that help make it possible. Now other
companies and policy-makers must act to scale
demonstrated solutions to enable exponential
reduction of carbon emissions globally.
Börje Ekholm
CEO, Ericsson
Food and land-use account for 23% of The world is a long way off the pathway we
global greenhouse gas emissions, yet these need to be on. But the roadmap shows that
sectors are often overlooked when it comes we can achieve this goal.
to developing mitigation strategies. Shifting
unhealthy, unsustainable diets in Western Owen Gaffney
industrialised countries and preventing the Exponential Roadmap co-lead author,
transition to Western diets in low income Stockholm Resilience Centre and Potsdam
countries is the greatest lever we have in Institute for Climate Impact Research
reducing emissions from food consumption,
while simultaneously reducing health-care
costs and human suffering from malnutrition
and diet-related diseases. In addition,
agriculture has huge potential for both reducing
emissions from land-use and storing carbon.
Science is clear. It’s now time to act.
Gunhild Stordalen
Founder and executive chair, EAT Forum
This roadmap uniquely focuses on three things.

The immediate priorities – reaching peak
emissions in 2020 and racing to cut emissions in
half by 2030. How we scale the new low-carbon
solutions exponentially and how we need to think
in terms of systems transformation of the whole
economy. We must now reach a critical mass of
countries, cities, companies and citizens with the
new compass direction to enable a virtuous
circle of change. Then it is achievable.
Johan Falk
Exponential Roadmap co-lead author and
programme manager, Internet of Planet, senior
innovation fellow Stockholm Resilience Centre
and Future Earth
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The 2019 Exponential Roadmap focuses on moving from incremental to Greenhouse gas emissions, and the solutions to reduce them, are grouped
exponential climate action in the next decade. It presents 36 economically- by six sectors: energy, industry, transport, buildings, food consumption,
viable solutions to cut global greenhouse gas emissions 50% by 2030 and nature-based solutions (sources and sinks).
the strategies to scale this transformation.
Meeting the 1.5°C goal means implementing solutions in parallel across all
The roadmap is consistent with the Paris Agreement’s goal to keep global sectors.
average temperature “well below 2°C” and aiming for 1.5°C above pre-
industrial levels. The solutions must scale exponentially. The roadmap identifies four levers
required to scale the transformation as well as necessary actions for
The 2019 roadmap is the second in the series. Each new roadmap updates each: policy, climate leadership and movements, finance and exponential
solutions that have proven potential to scale and charts progress towards technology.
exponential scaling. The roadmap, based on the carbon law (see box) is a
collaboration between academia, business and civil society. Implementation must be fair and just or risk deep resistance.
The roadmap is complemented with a high-ambition narrative, Meeting

the 1.5°C Ambition, that presents the case why holding global average
temperature increase to just 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels is important.
Since the first roadmap, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
(IPCC) published its special report on 1.5°C. The report concluded that the The carbon law pathway
economic and humanitarian risks of a 2°C world are significantly higher
We need Moonshot Thinking and exponential strategies inspired
than 1.5°C.
by Moore’s Law* to reach the Paris Agreement’s ambitious goal.
The carbon law trajectory**, first proposed in 2017, is consistent
The remaining emissions budget for 1.5°C is small, and will be exceeded
with the UN agreement and the limited remaining carbon budget:
within ten to fifteen years at current emission rates. The window of
feasibility is closing rapidly.
Emissions peak by 2020.
The global economic benefit of a low-carbon future is estimated at

Emission fall about 50% by 2030, then a further 50% by 2040,
US$26 trillion by 2030 compared with staying on the current high-carbon
and a further 50% by 2050.
pathway.
Agriculture transforms from a carbon source to a carbon sink.
The scale of transformation – halving emissions by 2030 – is
unprecedented but the speed is not. Some cities and companies can Solutions to store carbon, for example reforestation, biochar
transform significantly faster. or bioenergy with carbon capture and storage, are scaled up.
Developed nations with significant historic emissions have a responsibility Remaining natural carbon sinks are protected and enhanced.
to reduce emissions faster.
*The observation that computing power doubles approximately every two years.
**J. Rockström et al., A roadmap for rapid decarbonization. Science 355.6331,
1269-1271 (2017).
Exponential Roadmap: 36 solutions to cut greenhouse gas emissions 50% by 2030
ENERGY SUPPLY INDUSTRY BUILDINGS TRANSPORT
18.5 17.1 9.9 8.6
75% 75% 75% 75%

Annual emissions
Annual emissions
Annual emissions
Annual emissions
50% 50% 50% Reduced demand for 50% Mobility and a
Solar photovoltaics 9.2 Materials recirculation 8.6 building space 4.6 Mass transit a
Concentrated solar power Product materials efficiency Reduced energy use during operation Electric vehicl
25% Wind power 25% Production efficiency 25% Low-carbon heating and cooling 25% Efficient shipp
Other low−carbon energy Circular business models Double retrofitting Low-emission
Reduced methane emissions Refrigerant management Low−carbon construction Remote workin
2020 2025 2030 2020 2025 2030 2020 2025 2030 2020
Year Year Year
TOTAL EMISSIONS (Billions of tonnes of CO2e, baseline year 2020)
6.1 5.3 6.2 0.2 0.3 0.3
ENERGY’S OWN FOOD NATURE-BASED

INDUSTRY BUILDINGS TRANSPORT
EMISSIONS CONSUMPTION SOURCES
6.1 17.1 9.9 8.6 5.6 6.9

TRANSPORT FOOD CONSUMPTION NATURE BASED SOURCES NATURE BASED S
8.6 5.6 6.9 0

5.3
75% 75% 75%
Carbon storage potential

Annual emissions
Annual emissions
Annual emissions
Reforestation
50% Mobility and accessibiity 50% 50% Forest protection Improved fores
4.6 Mass transit and cycling 4.2 Avoided woodfuel harvest 3.4 Pasture manag
eration Electric vehicles Grazing management Biochar
ng 25% Efficient shipping 25% 25% Fertiliser management Improved agric
Low-emission heavy vehicles Healthy plant-based diet Improved rice cultivation Agroforestry
Remote working and meetings Reduced food loss and waste Peatland protection Peatland restor
2030 2020 2025 2030 2020 2025 2030 2020 2025 2030 2020
Year Year Year
FOOD CONSUMPTION NATURE BASED SOURCES NATURE BASED SINKS

Sectoral roadmap to halve emissions by 2030
Proposed trajectories for greenhouse gas emissions to peak in 2020 and approximately halve by 2030
(y-axis shows the sector’s annual % emissions). Each trajectory shows the overall sector emissions and
5.6 6.9 0
the relative contribution to emissions reductions from 5.3existing scalable solutions, for example, solar
photovoltaics or electric vehicles, plus nature-based sinks (right) that sequester greenhouse gases.
75% 75%
The number inset in each trajectory indicates emissions in 2020 and 2030 respectively in billions of
Carbon storage potential

Annual emissions
Annual emissions
tonnes (Gt) of CO2e per year for each emitting sector, and the storage potential for nature-based sinks. Reforestation
A global
50% shift to more healthy plant-based food can prevent the 50% increaseForest protection
in emissions caused by Improved forest management
4.2 population growth and reduce emissions from the food sector 5% by 2030. Avoided woodfuel sources
Nature-based harvest can 3.4 Pasture management -9.1
avoid emissions of 3.5 Gt CO2e by 2030 and new nature-based sinks can Grazing management
store 9.1 Gt CO2e by 2030. Biochar
25% 25% Fertiliser management Improved agriculture practices
The grey bar Healthy plant-based
to the left shows thediet
relative contribution of emitting sectors for the assumed
Improved 2020 baseline
rice cultivation Agroforestry
emissions of Reduced food
54 billion lossof
tonnes and
COwaste
2
e, i.e. it is including food and nature-based emission
Peatland protection sources but Peatland restoration
excluding nature-based sinks. The Energy supply trajectory addresses both the energy sector’s own
2030 2020 2025 2030 2020 2025 2030 2020 2025 2030
emissions (6.1 Gt) and emissions related to providing electricity and heat to other sectors (e.g. industry
Year Year Year
and buildings) with distribution visualised by the fields above the grey bar.
T R A N S F O R M I N G S E C TO R S Transport
Shorter trips are responsible for three quarters of transport emissions.
Taking these emissions to around zero is economically viable and brings
Energy transformation many co-benefits from healthy lifestyles to less polluted cities.
Any further investment in new carbon dioxide-emitting energy systems is
not consistent with the remaining carbon budget for 1.5°C global warming. Electrical and plug-in hybrid passenger vehicles can reach close to 100% of
new sales by 2030 if they continue on high current exponential growth curves,
In 2018 renewable energy accounted for almost two thirds of new even if growth slows from today’s growth of 50% per year to 32%. This
installations for electricity generation. Solar and wind energy accounted shift towards 100% of light vehicle sales to electric vehicles is the biggest
for 84% of this growth. The world has reached a tipping point in price and immediate opportunity to dramatically reduce emissions in the transport
performance for wind and solar power. In many places wind and solar are sector. The snowball has started rolling in last few years with many major
cheaper than fossil-fuel alternatives. economies and cities announcing incoming bans on new fossil-fuelled light-
duty vehicles as well as corporates committing to 100% electric vehicles.
The assumption that global energy demand will keep rising should be
questioned. Global energy demand has the potential to fall 40% without Mass transit, micromobility (cycling, scooters) and walking to avoid
sacrificing services and quality of life according to new energy scenarios. unnecessary car use is the other major opportunity to dramatically reduce
These scenarios bring the ambitious goal of halving emissions by 2030 emissions in the transport sector by 2030.
within reach.
A strong move to a usership instead of ownership model for cars can untap
Not hindering the current exponential trajectories for wind, solar more value from cars, which are unused 95% of the time. Such a car fleet
photovoltaics and battery storage will be enough to achieve a halving of could be just 3% of the size of today’s fleet of individually owned vehicles.
emissions by 2030. In less-developed markets, however, support is still
needed to reach a point where solar and wind energy can be supplied at Digital technology can cut business flights by 50% or more. Local
lower costs than fossil-fuels. co-working hubs can reduce commuting emissions by around 50–60%
annually for many people.
Policies to remove obstacles and ensure a rapid and smooth transition
from fossil to renewable energy include immediate removal of subsidies Heavy transportation can be optimised, retrofitted, electrified and use
from fossil-based power plants and infrastructure, introducing carbon renewable fuels enabling a fast halving of emissions. Long-haul transport
pricing, and minimising the social and economic impact on individuals who requires ambitious technology road maps.
lose out in the transition.
Halving emissions from shipping is technically feasible and economically
With the right policies and financing, many cities could achieve an viable with the right policy incentives and collaboration across the
electrical grid mix of 50–70% renewables (primarily solar and wind, maritime industry and stakeholders.
balanced with other zero-emission generation sources) by 2030.
Industry
Investment and research in new zero-carbon energy storage and
In most places energy and emissions efficiency standards are too weak.
generation technologies, such as wave power, must be sustained to
Stronger policies can drive dramatically higher material efficiency,
achieve the reductions necessary beyond 2030.
particularly with steel, cement, plastics and aluminium production.
Decarbonisation of high-emission materials might not add more than a few
percent in cost to end users. An increase in near-term R&D investment in Businesses must be open to new economic models that take advantage of
those industries will be vital to enable the deep decarbonisation required the sharing of space.
for the second and third halvings.
Funding should be allocated for sustainable retrofitting and construction,
Develop and scale the infrastructure required for the circular economy and perhaps through the use of green bonds.
accelerate reuse of materials through refunding schemes, increased scrap
collection and recycling rates. Solutions in this sector should be standardised and scalable around
the world – rather than dispersed and fragmented – to achieve results.
All manufacturing businesses and industries should set ambitious targets
to aim to halve emissions by the latest 2030 and there is a need to develop Food consumption
industry roadmaps across all sectors and value chains aligned with 1.5°C, A rapid shift towards reduced meat consumption (plant-based diets) and
creating a race to the top between companies. reduced food waste are essential components of a systematic strategy
to keep global warming well below 2°C. This will be accelerated through:
Physical retailers and e-commerce platforms should develop strategies to
incentivise low-emissions products, recycling and longer product lifetimes. Removal of subsidies promoting unsustainable and unhealthy food
production and consumption and new incentives for healthy and
Digitalisation is a key enabler to increase energy and material efficiencies, sustainable practices and behaviour.
and enable circular economy and usership-based business models. The
Internet of Things allows greater traceability of materials and products, Carbon pricing and supportive emission standards for the food system.
while artificial intelligence can optimise processes for efficiency. Industrial
design, engineering and architecture should increasingly adopt low- National dietary guidelines promoting healthy and sustainable eating
emissions options as default. and policies enacted to make healthy food affordable and accessible
to everyone.
Buildings
For countries, cities and companies, strong policies and programmes to Regulatory measures in place to drastically reduce food loss and waste.
halve carbon emissions in existing building stock are necessary. These
solutions must scale rapidly. Nature-based solutions
In 2018/2019 several major academic assessments on food system
New procurement practices for construction and renovation are required. transformation were published, for example the EAT-Lancet Commission
These should require dramatically improved energy and carbon emission on Healthy Diets from Sustainable Food Systems. These findings are now
standards. included in the roadmap. For these reasons, the 2019 roadmap expands on
nature-based solutions, for example reforestation and peatland management,
A critical mass of companies in the construction and facilities management to create new carbon sinks.
industries must become true climate leaders, driving emissions cuts
through value chains and setting an example for others to follow. Nature-based solutions, from forest protection, grazing management and
fertiliser management, can halve emissions by 2030, while reforestation,
New low-carbon business models for sharing space and smart buildings biochar and improved agricultural practices have the potential to store up
must scale globally to achieve economies of scale. to 9.1 billion tonnes of CO2e annually, eventually storing 225 billion tonnes
by the end of the century.
SCALING THE Strong efficiency and emissions standards and policies that drive
innovation towards low-energy demand and decarbonisation.
T R A N S F O R M AT I O N
Climate action integrated into technology strategies and accelerate digital,
circular and sharing economies.
Four exponential levers will scale the transformation.
Incentivise behaviour towards low-carbon consumption.
Policy and political momentum
The global economy is undergoing long-term structural changes: Promote nature-based solutions.
emissions have peaked in 49 countries. This is likely to continue
and it is likely to accelerate. Emissions in 18 developed countries Climate leadership
have been falling for over a decade, but the rate of decay is too slow. Climate leaders among cities, businesses, housing communities, and
individuals should demand 100% renewable electricity and explore
The political response to the IPCC 1.5°C special report has been investing in their own renewable energy production.
surprisingly swift. The UK and France join a growing number of countries
with laws to reach net zero by 2050 or earlier. More than 20 countries are More than 200 cities have committed to 100% renewable electricity with
discussing or have agreed a net zero 2050 target and climate and nature target years between 2020 and 2050. More cities should adopt initiatives
emergencies have been declared in 717 cities, municipalities and states. such as the WWF One Planet City Challenge to become net zero by 2050
and halve emissions by latest 2030.
A carbon price, though often too low, now covers territories
representing 20% of emissions. At the same time, large subsidies Social movements demanding large-scale action to address climate
support the fossil-fuel industry. change are growing. The Fridays For Future strikes by schoolchildren are
public displays of anger, frustration and disbelief among children that
In the recent European Union elections, voters in several major economies current political inertia will mean they inherit a dangerously destabilised
decisively moved towards parties with strong climate policies. climate. These movements are expanding to include people of all ages.
Policies to scale a just transformation include: More than 630 major companies are adopting Science Based Targets to
reduce emissions. However, just 15% of Fortune 500 companies have
Introduce national targets to reach net zero emissions by 2050 with targets aligned even with a 2°C world. A strategy for scaling is urgently
sub-targets to halve emissions by 2030 or earlier. required so, by 2020, all Fortune 500 companies adopt climate targets
aligned with the carbon law and disclose carbon assets, emissions, and
Develop national sectoral roadmaps and supporting policies and climate risks and opportunities.
strategies that reflect this ambition while safeguarding vulnerable groups
and all planetary boundaries. Media engagement in the climate crisis is changing. The media and
political language is shifting from a neutral “climate change” or “global
Price carbon emissions at a sufficient level. warming” to “climate emergency” and “climate crisis” in recognition of the
record-breaking flooding and drought events, and scientific progress.
Remove fossil-fuel subsidies and revolutionise agricultural subsidies.
Finance This summary provides a flavour of the solutions and how to accelerate
them. Much analysis lies behind it. Make sure to browse the whole report
Investors are recognising climate risk. Over 160 companies overseeing
to get the full picture and start implementing it. This is a race we can and
US$86 trillion in assets support the G20’s Task Force on Climate Related
must win.
Financial Disclosures (TCFD).
34 central banks recently joined forces to ensure a smooth transition to

a low-carbon economy: the Network for Greening the Financial System
(NGFS). This network, including the Bank of England and the Banque de
France, represents half of global greenhouse gas emissions.
The divestment movement continues to grow. Organisations with

investments of US$10 trillion have committed to divesting from fossil-
fuels.
Exponential technology
The digital sector is responsible for just 1.4% of global emissions,
but has an outsized influence on the exponential transformation to
halve emissions by 2030 because digitalisation will disrupt all parts
of the global economy in the next decade.
Digital services have potential, tenfold their footprint, to reduce energy

and materials across the economy and could directly enable a third of
the emissions reductions needed by 2030. We urgently need to explore
how the digital industry can enable societal goals beyond the industry’s
narrow footprint. This report explores some of these possibilities.
Exponential technologies risk driving emissions upwards as digital

platforms improve behavioural prediction to drive consumer demand of
unsustainable products and services. Moreover, social media platforms
can help climate advocacy and engagement. However, they are also
designed to accelerate the spread of emotionally charged information
including disinformation – algorithmic propaganda. This is contributing
to a rise in national populist movements that are often hostile to climate
policies, international cooperation, and even science. The most significant
risk from the digital revolution may not be artificial intelligence or
biotechnology – it might be the inability for consumers and citizens
to distinguish between fact and fiction.
ABOUT THIS
Values and models, including allocation between supply and demand side
solutions, will be continuously updated based on new research, methods and
data. We encourage any analysis to accelerate this process.
Navigating this report

The report consists of three main blocks: “Meeting the 1.5°C ambition”,
REPORT “Transforming sectors” and “Scaling the Transformation”.
The first block summarises the climate situation and highlights the challenges
and required actions ahead of us. The second presents the decarbonisation
trajectories of sectors such as energy, industry and transport – and 36
solutions to halve or reduce emissions in line with the carbon law. The
The first Exponential Climate Action Roadmap was produced for Global third block covers the key accelerators or drivers required to scale the
Climate Action Summit in September 2018 where it was presented as the solutions exponentially; policy, climate leadership, finance and exponential
opening keynote by Christiana Figueres and Johan Rockström. It was based technologies.
on an analysis published in Science, “A roadmap for rapid decarbonisation”,1
showing that peaking emissions in 2020, and approximately halving every Data, model and analysis
decade to 2050 is consistent with delivering the Paris Agreement on climate The report looks to approximately where the world needs to be in 2050 to
change. This was further emphasised by the IPCC 1.5°C Special Report limit global warming to a maximum of 1.5°C. A range of solutions are explored
released in November 2018.2 and their maximum potential for reducing and sequestering emissions are
evaluated. Then the report works backwards to estimate the journey that
This new version of the report, Exponential Roadmap 1.5, explores further how could take the economy to this destination by implementing the solutions
the carbon law can be implemented across all sectors of the global economy focusing particularly on the first step to 2030. It marries this with current data
to limit climate change to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels. While the end goal and trends, for example the exponential market growth of photovoltaics,
is 2050, it focuses on the road to 2030 – the first halving – and concludes wind power and healthier diets.
that while solutions exist, the scale of transformation requires system-wide
action accelerated by climate leadership, much stronger policy, finance and The solutions database is predominantly drawn from Project Drawdown6 and
exponential technologies. research and reports from the Finnish future fund Sitra,7 Roadmaps for Fossil
Free Sweden competitiveness (Fossilfritt Sverige), the International Energy
The roadmap represent a continuous development effort using agile Agency (IEA) and the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) Climate Solver
methodology. It will require ongoing and rapid iteration following feedback, and Mission Innovation Framework.8 Several solutions are updated based
new evidence and up-to-date information. For example, in this version of the on the “LED scenario”.5 You can find a full description of the methodology
report, solutions and trajectories have been refined and updated from the and assumptions used to create the trajectories found in this report online
first version based on the recent reports from the Intergovernmental Panel on at www.exponentialroadmap.org.
Climate Change,2,3 the EAT-Lancet Commission,4 and the recently published
“LED scenario” (low energy demand).5
The “Food consumption” and “Agriculture and forestry” chapters from the Digital view of the exponential roadmap
first version (called “Food consumption” and “Nature-based solutions” in this
The data from this report is open, and can be combined with other roadmaps
version) have undergone a major update based on the recently published EAT-
and planning tools. We use a digital tool, developed by ClimateView, to
Lancet Commission report.
develop and visualise roadmaps – the tool is also being used by the Swedish
government to map policy and action to reach a fossil-free economy by
This more detailed modelling concludes that 50% reduction of the food
2045. We have adapted the tool to track the carbon law trajectory of halving
sector ́s emissions by 2030 would not be realistic given projected population
emissions every decade. For more information, see the “Open data” chapter
growth and significant burdens of malnutrition in many countries. For this
of this report.
reason the report reflects a drawdown of the food sector’s emissions from
5.6 Gt to 5.3 Gt by 2030 (and to at least 5 Gt, the planetary boundary for food,4
by 2050) through a shift in diets in mainly Western industrialised countries while
preventing a nutrition transition to Western diets in many developing countries.
The nature-based solutions are drawn from many recent studies and reports
outlined in the chapter. Solutions for reducing emissions and sequestering
emissions are now presented separately.
Assumptions in this report

The global emissions of greenhouse gases were estimated at 54 billion tonnes
(Gt) of CO2 equivalents in 2018,10,11,12 which is used as the baseline. These 54
Gt are distributed among six sectors addressed in the report, as described
in the diagram on pages 12 and 13. The basic principle is that we allocate
emissions to one sector and address it in that sector only. For instance,
emissions from gasoline combustion in cars is allocated to only the transport
sector. However, in the case of energy, both demand and supply solutions
are very important, so emissions from electricity and heat production are
addressed in both the supply sector (energy sector) and demand sectors and
emissions are distributed accordingly.
In order to achieve rapid decarbonisation to 2030, global primary energy

demand should be reduced, in line with the LED scenario.5 This is achieved
by efficiency gains in energy conversion, in industry, transport and buildings.
In our scenario we assume electricity consumption to be flat in 2020–2030
as increasing electrification and number of end-users counteracts efficiency
gains and savings elsewhere.
MEETING THE
1.5°C AMBITION
Climate change is now affecting people on

all continents and the impacts are becoming
more severe. Scientific evidence shows
that humanity is taking grave risks with the
stability of Earth’s climate system if global
average surface temperature continues
rising alongside ecological destruction.
Reducing this risk means societies working
together to stabilise temperature rise at
around 1.5°C. This translates to halving
greenhouse gas emissions every decade
from now on to approach net zero emissions
by 2050.
Achieving a 1.5°C planet will require the

fastest economic transition in history.
This transformation is both necessary
and achievable. The journey has already
begun. Here we chart the actions needed
immediately and in the next decade to
accelerate the transformation towards
a safe operating space for humanity.
Meeting the 1.5°C Ambition began in 2015 when 197 nations forged the Countries have already committed to meeting Nationally Determined
Paris Agreement and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The Paris Contributions (NDCs) under the Paris Agreement, but these must be
Agreement created a global consensus to limit Earth’s temperature rise to significantly enhanced to meet a 1.5°C goal. The NDCs are far too weak to
“well below 2°C”, and “to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase to meet even the 2°C target. Immediate and ambitious targets for countries,
1.5°C above pre-industrial levels”, in order to safeguard world development cities and companies, backed up with actions, are now essential to cut
and human wellbeing. emissions 50% by 2030 or sooner.
In 2015, nations invited scientists to assess the impacts of 1.5°C global It will take colossal efforts to redirect investment towards clean energy,
warming and provide pathways to achieve this goal. In 2018, after two years shift production and consumption towards low-carbon solutions, and forge
of intense effort, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) broad political support to make this transformation a reality. However, the means
concluded that a 1.5°C world would be substantially better for societies than to achieve these goals already exist.3 With ambitious leadership based on
2°C. The assessment also concluded that stabilising temperature at around the best science the next decade can bring the fastest economic
1.5°C is feasible, the cost would be affordable and that achieving it brings transformation in history.
many other substantial benefits for the economy, ecosystems and human
wellbeing.1
The cost of weak action setting course for a planet over 3°C warmer – which
is the current trajectory – will be catastrophic for many societies. Based on the
findings of the report we conclude that we face a planetary crisis: the need to
act is urgent and failure to act in time and at scale brings existential risks.
The IPCC 1.5 Special Report and other recent research firmly conclude that
stabilising temperature at 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels is essential and will
require an extraordinary transformation of lifestyles, behaviours, norms and
values in our society.
Three levers are essential for large-scale systems change:
1. A new worldview. We face unprecedented planetary risks where

exponential action is necessary to stabilise Earth’s climate.
2. A global goal. We need to reach net zero greenhouse gas emissions

by 2050 to stabilise global average temperature at 1.5°C above
pre-industrial levels. This can and should be achieved equitably and
without compromising other Sustainable Development Goals.
3. A just pathway. We must aim to cut global greenhouse gas emissions

in half by 2030 – or sooner – then halve them again by 2040 and reach
net zero by 2050 – a pathway called the carbon law.2
You are here 2018 projection

Despite tremendous improvements in some low-energy technologies in the 37.1 Gt CO2, 2.7% (0.8 – 3.0%)
last decade, in 2018, global emissions grew an estimated 2.7%.4 A major 40 2017
economic transformation, though, may be underway, and visible in the 36.1 Gt CO2
plateauing of emissions between 2014 and 2016 (see figure 1). In the energy
sector exponential improvements in cost and performance are already 38
disrupting old business models. Solar and wind power are now the same price
or cheaper than electricity from coal in most places even without accounting 36
for the health and environmental impacts of fossil-fuels.5 Prices are tumbling
2000 – 09
as small-scale, distributed clean energy networks innovate and roll out faster
+3.3%/yr
than large-scale fossil-fuel infrastructure. Similar transformations in other 34
CO2 emissions (Gt CO2/yr)

sectors – transport, agriculture, buildings and industry – are visible, too.
32
Yet, technology alone will not solve the climate crisis. Technological
innovation helped cause the problem in the first place and, undirected, it could
simply drive us towards a catastrophic 3°C world. Policies to reverse this 30
trend are needed. So too are policies to change the behaviour of markets and
people. For example, fossil-fuel subsidies currently outstrip all investment in
renewable energy globally. In 2018, fossil-fuel subsidies reached over US$400 28
billion, a level not seen since 2014, according to the International Energy 1990 – 99
+1.1%/yr
Agency. 26
The Exponential Roadmap focuses on the actions needed to reach the short-
term goal of peaking emissions as soon as possible and halving emissions 24
by 2030. The presented solutions, which must be implemented in parallel,
are based on academic research and expert assessment of their potential to
22
scale exponentially and create virtuous cycles, like those in the technology
industry, where improvements in performance and price drive higher value.
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015
The roadmap presents one among many potential pathways. Reality will
Data: CDIAC/GCP/BP/USGS
unfold with many twists and turns. Whichever path societies take will require
exponential action to transform our global economy if we are to increase
prosperity and well-being for the most people globally.6,1 The roadmap Figure 1. Global fossil-fuel and cement emissions 1960–2018
necessarily focuses on mitigation. Unavoidable climate change will require After a three-year hiatus with stable global emissions, CO2 emissions grew by 1.6%
adaptation and resilience building but this is not the focus of this report. in 2017 and were estimated by the Global Carbon Project to have grown a further 2.7%
in 2018 (range: 1.8%–3.7%). Estimates for 2019 emissions remain uncertain but similar
strong growth appears likely because the persistent expansion of oil and natural gas
use and solid growth projected for the global economy, according to the Global Carbon
Project. Data: Global Carbon Project (2018)4
400
Cost Range
Average Cost
Estimated global levellised cost

of electricity in 2016 USD
Adapted from: IRENA 2018
300
200
100 FOSSIL FUEL

POWER COST
RANGE
0
2010 2017 2010 2017 2010 2017 2010 2017
Solar Solar Onshore Offshore

photovoltaics thermal wind wind
Figure 2. Price drop in solar and wind power since 2010

The dramatic fall in costs of wind and solar energy in the last decade has reached a tipping
point where prices increasingly are lower than many fossil-fuel alternatives. Source: Irena
Renewable Cost Database.5
THE SCALE OF THE CHALLENGE

IN NUMBERS
197 185
The number of parties The number of
that have signed the
countries that have
UN’s Paris Agreement on
climate change. ratified the agreement.
*Legislation includes options to purchase carbon credits to reach these targets.

90 97
The probability of The probability of
exceeding 2°C based
on what countries have
% exceeding 2°C based
on what countries are
%
promised to do.7 actually doing.7
The number of countries The number of countries
16 8
with national laws with legislation or
consistent with their proposed legislation to
emissions reduction reach net zero emissions
pledges. by 2050*.
The years left until
2.7 0
The growth in carbon
dioxide emissions
from fossil-fuels
% emissions need to peak
for the world to stand a
much better chance of
and cement in 2018.4 reaching the 1.5°C target.
26 EXPONENTIAL
MEETING THE 1.5°C
ROADMAP
CLIMATE
1.5 AMBITION
A N E W WO R L DV I E W:
Bitemperibus, sus quam fuga. Et ium volore plitiam quam faccabo ribusdae
pla sinture, nobistiuntis pores conecto tatincti as dolupta nos doluptae pa
Luptatet ute seque labores in enectot atincilles re parum ex erionse restiosam
cus auta volendam nonsed maximus, cus dolor maximus et el imusda dolorro
OUR PLANET ON THE EDGE
voluptatur re vollacc ullacep udandae pra ius reperferciis venimen imaximet quo di tes as aut aperatq uasitate sed qui corectiuntet quam velis rerspel
et porem endic to que pro blaccus, sinciis remporeiusa quatur alique esciden itatur, officia aut aut aliciento quam remos aut mo officiusa niBit la nulpa
deriorr uptaecesci nimincto vitassite delesent, conserc hiligni enimporeium volorias reperit voluptat labor resequam qui a prat quod utem quati sequi
In
nosJanuary
dolupta2019, Swedish
tendunt millest,student Greta
volendae Thunberg
expla told world
arumquam, leaders
comnimi at the
llatius aliscia voluta pore pe int aut porio volenim iunto tem vera quamus.
World Economic Forum “I want you to act as you would in a crisis.
apellatur, volorum restem fugitatur? Cum, est, untiae nobis etur as que res I want you
to
diossimaio. Ut quos delis doluptus ad quatiis eatem venimin vendanitae inour
act as if our house is on fire. Because it is.” Every child’s birthright, and Laboreris et od que incturepe venia et et et, tessintiis di doluptatem es sit,
common
repudant heritage
quis ium is a stable,
nus, sinis ea resilient
quat. planet. This birthright is now at risk. optas dollore mquaspitat eosseribus.
From the
Ventori unparalleled
ipsandamet, heat-waves
solores acerum across the northern
ad magnis hemisphere
ma voluptatem in 2018
rescipsaerum Quatur secatus mollabo ratur, quiae conseque coraeperiam as am fuga.
and 2019 to Cape Town’s “Day Zero” water crisis, to this year’s hottest
quatus aliqui rescim eosam fuga. Ecto volesci isimusam re sequi dus eic tem Em hilibus totatur sunt plit quiscium exerum fugitius esti cum nobiscit
summer on record
volo deremque in Australia,
maximus to an unprecedented cyclone in Mozambique
citiuntiat. remquuntibus invelit fugiasp eribus il et lam, aut lam, qui voluptatium
that created an “inland ocean” overnight, climate-related natural disasters are quas eseceatur, que consecumquod mi, tem re asincto doluptatum que
now assailing
Magnatem our planet.
conseque sum et faciasperro dent. volesequunde estemporum audis nectiumque corro is eicit expliquam,
eturia solecti dolorporunt quassitati beatus simporr orestem re, nimpor alis
Modern
Ollita que societies arose during
veliqui blaborpor a 10,000-year
ra saperum period
haruptiur, of remarkable
simet ea ditatiatem climatic
etur, maximusapid ex eos abor militat. Bitemperibus, sus quam fuga. Et ium volore
stability
si comnimp oritatu repernatur adit, ape nus des de verumqui ut officaeand
on Earth, known as the Holocene. Earth has left the Holocene pro plitiam quam faccabo ribusdae pla sinture, nobistiuntis pores conecto tatincti
entered the Anthropocene
quidisc ilignihilis where
audi cullabor industrialised
reictatus, societies
nobis experum quoaremiltheimenderum
prime et as dolupta nos doluptae pa voluptatur re vollacc ullacep udandae pra ius
driver of change
volorposame to Earth’s
veliqui liferesupport
atinturit system.
pore, occus Earth’svel
magnam, temperature has now
molorpo reperuntor reperferciis venimen imaximet et porem endic to que pro blaccus, sinciis
topped 1°Ccommodipiet,
alicillis dio above pre-industrial
et restotemperatures
berum que volla – ansiunprecedented
abore nonsequis leap
eosin remporeiusa quatur alique esciden deriorr uptaecesci nimincto vitassite
human history. The impacts are already more severe than
eosse laborume excesse nditece rferum volest, occum sit, unt fugiatem sed most researchers delesent, conserc hiligni enimporeium nos dolupta tendunt millest, volendae
estimated a decade
et plit quistius, conecae ago.ne
The temperature
sequi is risinglaci
con consequam almost 0.2°C
dolliat everyium
enditate decade expla arumquam, comnimi llatius apellatur, volorum restem fugitatur? Cum,
and the rate is accelerating. In October 2018, the Intergovernmental
doluptati berferecab ide dio que vellupt aspiene aut utem fuga. Nem num Panel est, untiae nobis etur as que res diossimaio. Ut quos delis doluptus ad quatiis
on Climate Change (IPCC) concluded that the impacts of a warmer world are
velectur? eatem venimin vendanitae in repudant quis ium nus, sinis ea quat.
– and will be – significantly worse than previous estimates. In a 2°C world we
can
Libusexpect increased
as alitibe rnametwater stress,
eictur, sedis food security
ius aute libust,challenges,
tem re id quos summer sea ice
doloratia Ventori ipsandamet, solores acerum ad magnis ma voluptatem rescipsaerum
regularly
dent. disappearing in the Arctic and near-total loss of existing warm-water quatus aliqui rescim eosam fuga. Ecto volesci isimusam re sequi dus eic tem
corals, impacting livelihoods. Limiting warming to 1.5°C rather than 2°C could volo deremque maximus citiuntiat.
result
Epudam in 420
volestmillion fewer
volupid people beingsin
ut exceptatem exposed to severe
pe rehentibus sit heatwaves.
lis quae ration
consequo occus in rem nonseque rem. Itatem raturit aspiet autaspelent. Magnatem conseque sum et faciasperro dent.
Dolorere volestis sus simet quuntiones invent aut que cum rernamusdae Ollita que veliqui blaborpor ra saperum haruptiur, simet ea ditatiatem etur,
dicae nonsequi to ex explis dolutat harchit andelec aborepe licipsum estiasi si comnimp oritatu repernatur adit, ape nus des de verumqui ut officae pro
mpostis minctat utatatem quos de incto verumqu atibus pero odigent, simus quidisc ilignihilis audi cullabor reictatus, nobis experum quo mil imenderum et
experia esequia sedias et faccum quatem cus nis porem faciae pa conecabor volorposame veliqui atinturit re pore, occus magnam, vel molorpo reperuntor
amet odis maximilis provit atiaers pictorrovid maione consequ iduscidus asim alicillis dio commodipiet, et resto berum que volla si abore nonsequis eos
quam, sequi doluptia deliquis atiusam incti quam nem harum quossim ius, aut eosse laborume excesse nditece rferum volest, occum sit, unt fugiatem sed
ium in nihilla borerro volupta tessim fugit optat. et plit quistius, conecae ne sequi con consequam laci dolliat enditate ium
doluptati berferecab ide dio que vellupt aspiene aut utem fuga. Nem num est, untiae nobis etur as que res diossimaio. Ut quos delis doluptus ad quatiis
velectur? eatem venimin vendanitae in repudant quis ium nus, sinis ea quat.
Libus as alitibe rnamet eictur, sedis ius aute libust, tem re id quos doloratia Ventori ipsandamet, solores acerum ad magnis ma voluptatem rescipsaerum
dent. quatus aliqui rescim eosam fuga. Ecto volesci isimusam re sequi dus eic tem
volo deremque maximus citiuntiat.
Epudam volest volupid ut exceptatem sin pe rehentibus sit lis quae ration
Magnatem conseque sum et faciasperro dent.
consequo occus in rem nonseque rem. Itatem raturit aspiet autaspelent.
“I want you to act as
Dolorere volestis sus simet quuntiones invent aut que cum rernamusdae
dicae nonsequi to ex explis dolutat harchit andelec aborepe licipsum estiasi
you would in a crisis.
Ollita que veliqui blaborpor ra saperum haruptiur, simet ea ditatiatem etur,
si comnimp oritatu repernatur adit, ape nus des de verumqui ut officae pro
mpostis minctat utatatem quos de incto verumqu atibus pero odigent, simus I want
quidisc ilignihilis audi cullabor you
reictatus, nobis toquoact
experum as if
mil imenderum et
experia esequia sedias et faccum quatem cus nis porem faciae pa conecabor volorposame veliqui atinturit re pore, occus magnam, vel molorpo reperuntor
amet odis maximilis provit atiaers pictorrovid maione consequ iduscidus asim our
alicillis dio commodipiet, et resto house
berum isnonsequis
que volla si abore on fire. eos
quam, sequi doluptia deliquis atiusam incti quam nem harum quossim ius, aut eosse laborume excesse nditece rferum volest, occum sit, unt fugiatem sed
ium in nihilla borerro volupta tessim fugit optat. et plit quistius, conecae ne sequi con consequam Because itiumis. ”
laci dolliat enditate
doluptati berferecab ide dio que vellupt aspiene aut utem fuga. Nem num
Luptatet ute seque labores in enectot atincilles re parum ex erionse restiosam velectur?
cus auta volendam nonsed maximus, cus dolor maximus et el imusda dolorro
quo di tes as aut aperatq uasitate sed qui corectiuntet quam velis rerspel Libus as alitibe rnamet eictur, sedis ius aute libust, tem re id quos doloratia
itatur, officia aut aut aliciento quam remos aut mo officiusa niBit la nulpa dent. Greta Thunberg
volorias reperit voluptat labor resequam qui a prat quod utem quati sequi World Economic Forum, Davos 2019
aliscia voluta pore pe int aut porio volenim iunto tem vera quamus. Epudam volest volupid ut exceptatem sin pe rehentibus sit lis quae ration
consequo occus in rem nonseque rem. Itatem raturit aspiet autaspelent.
Laboreris et od que incturepe venia et et et, tessintiis di doluptatem es sit,
optas dollore mquaspitat eosseribus. Dolorere volestis sus simet quuntiones invent aut que cum rernamusdae
dicae nonsequi to ex explis dolutat harchit andelec aborepe licipsum estiasi
Quatur secatus mollabo ratur, quiae conseque coraeperiam as am fuga. mpostis minctat utatatem quos de incto verumqu atibus pero odigent, simus
Em hilibus totatur sunt plit quiscium exerum fugitius esti cum nobiscit experia esequia sedias et faccum quatem cus nis porem faciae pa conecabor
remquuntibus invelit fugiasp eribus il et lam, aut lam, qui voluptatium amet odis maximilis provit atiaers pictorrovid maione consequ iduscidus asim
quas eseceatur, que consecumquod mi, tem re asincto doluptatum que quam, sequi doluptia deliquis atiusam incti quam nem harum quossim ius, aut
volesequunde estemporum audis nectiumque corro is eicit expliquam, ium in nihilla borerro volupta tessim fugit optat.
eturia solecti dolorporunt quassitati beatus simporr orestem re, nimpor alis
maximusapid ex eos abor militat. Bitemperibus, sus quam fuga. Et ium volore Luptatet ute seque labores in enectot atincilles re parum ex erionse restiosam
plitiam quam faccabo ribusdae pla sinture, nobistiuntis pores conecto tatincti cus auta volendam nonsed maximus, cus dolor maximus et el imusda dolorro
as dolupta nos doluptae pa voluptatur re vollacc ullacep udandae pra ius quo di tes as aut aperatq uasitate sed qui corectiuntet quam velis rerspel
reperferciis venimen imaximet et porem endic to que pro blaccus, sinciis itatur, officia aut aut aliciento quam remos aut mo officiusa niBit la nulpa
remporeiusa quatur alique esciden deriorr uptaecesci nimincto vitassite volorias reperit voluptat labor resequam qui a prat quod utem quati sequi
delesent, conserc hiligni enimporeium nos dolupta tendunt millest, volendae aliscia voluta pore pe int aut porio volenim iunto tem vera quamus.
expla arumquam, comnimi llatius apellatur, volorum restem fugitatur? Cum,
Hothouse Earth
In 2018, researchers warned that going
beyond 2°C – which is very likely based
on current emissions trajectories – could
potentially trigger natural processes to
Estimated tipping point
drive uncontrollable warming and pushing
range for identified risk areas
the planet towards a “Hothouse Earth” state
1ºC – 3ºC
about 4°C above preindustrial temperatures.8
3ºC – 5ºC
If temperatures rise much further than today, > 5ºC
major ice sheets are likely to destabilise Greenland Arctic Winter
(there is evidence this may be underway), Ice Sheet Sea Ice
Arctic Summer
causing sea levels to eventually rise 20 Sea Ice Permafrost
metres or more, bringing constant flood risks Jet Stream
Boreal
to coastal cities from Miami to Mumbai. Food Forest Alpine
security will be severely threatened and many Glaciers
parts of the planet will become uninhabitable
due to the extreme heat. Earth has not been Thermohaline
Circulation
this warm in over three million years. Indian
Sahel Summer
El Niño Monsoon
This risk arises due to tipping points in the Southern
Oscillation
Earth system. These relate to, for example, Amazon Coral
the dieback of boreal forests and Amazon Rainforest Reefs
rainforest or permafrost melting, both of
which store vast quantities of carbon. If these
tipping points are crossed it could lead to
the release of additional carbon into the
atmosphere, making climate stabilisation
significantly more challenging. The problems
are compounded though, because research West Antarctic
East Antarctic
Ice Sheet
also indicates that crossing one tipping point Ice Sheet
can create a domino effect making it more
likely other tipping points are crossed. Due to
these complex feedbacks, a “Hothouse Earth”
scenario is plausible even if greenhouse gas
emissions from human sources are reduced Figure 3. Earth’s tipping points
dramatically. There is strong evidence to Map of the locations of potential large-scale tipping points, the
suggest that these feedbacks are unlikely to be estimated temperature ranges of the tipping points and potential
triggered if temperature rise remains below 2°C.9 interactions between tipping points. Crossing one tipping point can
increase the risk of crossing another (PNAS 2018 Steffen et al.8)
Existential threats
Climate change threatens people’s lives and livelihoods, and the most
vulnerable are disproportionally affected. For communities on low-lying Pacific
Islands, as well as people living in towns and cities along exposed, low-lying
costs, climate change is an existential threat. Even if emissions disappeared
tomorrow, sea levels will keep rising for centuries. Climate change is also an
existential threat to people eking out a living on marginal lands and expanding
deserts. It is an existential threat to once-fertile farmlands that feed millions
of people. And it is an existential threat to stable societies the world over as
droughts, floods, migration and food crises exacerbate conflicts. The IPCC’s
Fifth Assessment Report concludes, “From a poverty perspective, climate
change impacts are projected to slow down economic growth, make poverty
reduction more difficult, further erode food security and prolong existing
poverty traps and create new ones, the latter particularly in urban areas and
emerging hotspots of hunger.” This is supported by Philip Alston, UN special
rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights. Alston recently raised the
concern that the world is at risk of “climate apartheid” where the rich pay to
avoid devastating consequences of climate while the poorest suffer: “Climate
change threatens to undo the last 50 years of progress in development, global
health, and poverty reduction.”10
Above: People take refuge on the roofs of buildings following
On top of this, human activities are placing increasing strain on Earth’s
flooding caused by Cyclone Idai in Mozambique.
ecosystems, reducing their resilience to absorb shocks from human impact.
About 12% of all species are now threatened with extinction.11 This creates
huge threats to fishing grounds and coral reefs, to Arctic habitats and
rainforests, and to many other ecosystems which support the fabric of our
economies and societies. Warmer waters led to mass bleaching events in the
Great Barrier Reef in 2016 and 2017 that killed almost half of the coral across
wide swaths of the reef.12 In 2019, deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon has Changing our language to communicate the risk
reached a rate of at least three football pitches a minute, weakening the role More people and organisations are changing the language they use to
the forest plays in stabilising the climate.13 describe climate change. Increasingly, phrases such as “climate and nature
emergency”, “climate crisis”, “climate breakdown” or “global heating” are being
used by the United Nations, the UK’s Met Office, the Guardian newspaper and
others. The evidence now supports this change in language.
Likewise, phrases such as “business as usual” or “current trends” should

increasingly be viewed as problematic descriptions of future economic
pathways because their blandness masks climate disruption. Updating the
language used must reflect the need to support just and safe transformations.
T H E G OA L :
N E T Z E RO BY 2 0 5 0
There may still be time to stabilise Earth’s temperature at around Greenhouse gas emissions from existing and proposed energy infrastructure
1.5°C without recourse to very large-scale and high-risk geoengineering – coal-fired power plants under construction or commissioned, for example
deployment. But the window is closing rapidly. Limiting temperature rise to – represent more than the entire carbon budget remaining to limit warming
1.5°C will require unprecedented action in four areas: Global greenhouse to 1.5°C with a probability of at least 50%, and perhaps two thirds of the
gas emissions must be drastically reduced, peaking now and reaching net remaining carbon budget if warming is to be limited to less than 2 °C.17
zero by 2050 at the latest. Farming and other land use must move to become
stores of carbon rather than emitting greenhouse gases. We need large-scale Most computer model scenarios to achieve climate stabilisation at
reforestation and forest, wetland and peatland management to protect the 1.5°C rely on so-called negative emissions technologies (NETs) to remove
resilience of vital Earth systems. Finally, we must develop and scale robust between 400 and 1000 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere,
solutions for storing carbon safely. or 20–50% of the CO2 emitted in the last 200 years.18 While the world will
likely need to deploy a range of NET solutions, for example Bioenergy and
The IPCC 1.5 report concludes that this is achievable: “These systems Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS), these technologies are controversial.
transitions are unprecedented in terms of scale, but not necessarily in terms They have never been attempted at large scale, they are expensive and carry
of speed, and imply deep emissions reductions in all sectors.” Wealthier the risks of serious unintended consequences. At a minimum, BECCS, for
nations, with large historic emissions, have a responsibility to set tougher example, will require a trade off between growing energy crops and growing
targets. Norway has set a target of net zero by 2030. Finland has set 2035 food. It will place huge demands on freshwater and fertilisers and conflict
and Sweden 2045 to reach net zero for emissions within their jurisdictions. with biodiversity goals. Given the grave risks of over-reliance on untried
It should be noted though that these targets often include purchase of technologies, these should be deployed as an insurance policy, not the
carbon credits. primary solution. But, as the remaining carbon budget dwindles, they will
become increasingly necessary.
A rapid transition to 1.5°C world will bring strong co-benefits in terms of
prosperity, health, security and economy. Heatwaves will be less frequent and
the number of people at risk of water stress reduces by 50% compared with
2°C. The number of premature deaths is estimated to be lower by 100–200
million people in a 1.5°C world compared with 2°C.1 The economic benefit
of a low-carbon future by 2030 is US$26 trillion compared with staying on
the current high-carbon pathway.14 The UK Committee on Climate Change,
for example, estimates the direct cost of achieving net zero emissions by
2050 is just 1–2% of the UK’s GDP.15 This estimate does not cover significant
avoided costs and indirect benefits. On the flipside, the estimated losses due
to stranded assets (worthless pipelines, coal mines and oil wells) is up to US$4
trillion if weak policies in the next decade slow down climate progress.16
“We will move to a low-carbon

world because nature will
force us, or because policy
will guide us. If we wait until
nature forces us, the cost will
be astronomical.”
Christiana Figueres
Convener of Mission 2020. Executive secretary of the UNFCCC
from 2010 – 2016 and directed the Paris Agreement of 2015
T H E PAT H WAY:
H A LV E G R E E N H O U S E 100%
GAS EMISSIONS 54 59 33 38 19
GtCO2e GtCO2e GtCO2e GtCO2e GtCO2e
E V E RY D E C A D E
The goal of reaching net zero emissions by 2050 translates to an exponential
pathway of cutting greenhouse gas emissions in half every decade: 50% by
2030, then 50% again by 2040, then 50% again by 2050. At the same time
farming and land use must shift from emitting greenhouse gases to storing 50% OF 2018
them and we need to scale up solutions to store carbon. We call this pathway EMISSIONS
the “carbon law”.2 The carbon law is an exponential trajectory inspired by
Moore’s Law in computing where computing power doubles and costs halve
every few years.
Reaching net zero emissions by 2050 will not be simple. But as this roadmap 2018 2030
shows, solutions already exist in all economic sectors to halve emissions by
2030, as a stepping stone to the ultimate goal. The solutions are described
greenhouse gases
emissions of
Current annual global
current policies
2030 emissions given
feasible solutions available today

economically – and technologically –
potential by 2030 based on
Global emissions reductions
mitigation technologies
by 2030 including newer, unproven
Global emissions reductions potential
and individuals by 2030

reductions from cities, businesses
Maximum potential of emissions
in detail in the sector specific chapters. The key strategies are to markedly
improve efficiencies in energy and material usage, reduce demand for
energy intensive activities, electrify as much as possible, and produce that
electricity from renewable energy sources. The United Nations Environment’s
Emissions Gap report estimates that existing, market-ready solutions can cut
greenhouse gas emissions by more than 50% by 2030.19
Figure 4. Emissions reduction potential

Sectoral emission reduction potentials that are technically and economically feasible in
2030 based on carbon pricing up to US$100/tCOe. The assessment shows that global
emissions could be reduced by 33 GtCO2e/year in 2030, compared to the current policy
scenario of 59 GtCO2e/year based on existing market-ready solutions and behavioural
change. Data: UNEP Emissions Gap Report 2018.
100%
F-Gases
N2O
“We are already at the
start of this pathway.
CH4 In the last decade, the
share of wind and solar
75%
CO2 Land Use

in the energy sector
CO2 Chemicals
doubled every five years.
If doubling continues at
this pace fossil-fuels will
exit the energy sector
50%
before 2050.”
CO2 Fossil Fuels
Johan Rockström
25% Director Potsdam Institute of Climate Impact Research
0%
Figure 5. Greenhouse gas emissions

Carbon dioxide is the primary greenhouse gas emitted by human activities. Unlike other
greenhouse gases, it affects the climate system for thousands of years. Methane (CH4 )
is 28–36 times more powerful as a greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide and emissions
today last about a decade in the atmosphere. Nitrous oxide (N2O ) is more powerful still (265–
298 times the warming potential of CO2 ) and lasts a century in the atmosphere. Fluorinated
gases (F-gases) also have a greater warming potential than CO2 and last thousands of years
in the atmosphere. Data: Environmental Protection Agency and Project Drawdown.
Difficult to decarbonise sectors 1% Long-Distance Road Transport

0
Some economic sectors are more difficult to decarbonise than others, 2% Aviation
3% Shipping
including aviation, shipping, long-distance transport, cement and steel
production. These account for about 27% of global CO2 emissions from all 10
fossil-fuel and industrial sources (~9.2 Gt CO2).20 Investments in R&D in the 11% Short-Distance Light Road Transport
2020s will be essential to ensure market-ready solutions exist to halve global

emissions a second time from 2030. However, reducing demand for these 20 5% Short-Distance Med/Heavy Road Transport
products will also play a critical role in sustaining a carbon law pathway.
(See the following pages: Seven strategies central to the ‘low energy demand’
12% Load-Following Electricity
scenario). 30
Some major companies are taking substantial strides to tackle these hard-to-
reach sectors. For example, truck company Scania has published a roadmap 40
to become net zero by 2050. The world’s largest shipping company, Maersk,
has committed to becoming 100% carbon neutral by 2050. And cement 26% Electricity
company Dalmia aims to be carbon negative by 2040. In Sweden, the steel 50
industry is planning to have the first commercial scale zero-emissions steel
plant, using hydrogen fuel, operational by the early 2030s. Since 2017,
Oslo has required that municipal construction projects are fossil free and 60
5% Combined Heat & Electricity
a commissioned study showed that almost all construction site emissions
2% Heat
could be eliminated in the city by 2025.
70 4% Cement
The UK’s Committee on Climate Change estimates that reducing greenhouse 5% Iron & Steel
gas emissions by 96% by 2050 is feasible but reducing emissions in certain
80
hard-to-reach sectors – from aviation and shipping to manufacturing and
14% Other Industry
industrial processes – will likely require significant scaling-up of electrification,
hydrogen, carbon capture and storage, and other low-carbon solutions.
90
10% Residential, Commercial
100
Figure 6. Hard to decarbonise sectors

Global fossil-fuel and industry emissions by sector based on 2014 data* (total 33.9 GtCO2 ).
Industrial sectors that are hard to decarbonise are marked in purple and sectors that are
easier to decarbonise in grey (graphic based on data from reference 20).
*Percentages may not add up to 100% due to independent rounding.
Dramatically reducing energy demand Consumers who have reduced meat consumption, or who are no longer
interested in car ownership or even driving.
In recent years, researchers and policymakers have overwhelmingly focused
on how to decarbonise the energy supply in order to meet climate goals.
Service providers like Nest and Phillips which have developed smarter,
In contrast, the recent ‘low energy demand’ study showed how reducing
lower-energy systems for heating and lighting homes.
energy demand can deliver a 1.5°C climate while supporting global health,
education, poverty, employment and food security goals.23
Research organisations like the International Transport Forum which have
shown how flexible on-demand ‘taxi-buses’ can deliver urban mobility
In the ‘low energy demand’ scenario, global consumption of energy is
needs with less than half the CO2 emissions and close to zero congestion.
40% lower in 2050 than it is today. Seven strategies are at the heart of this
energy demand transformation (pages 28–29). Each strategy is founded on
Digitalisation and electrification are common themes of the ‘low energy
examples of best practice from pioneering countries, cities, neighbourhoods,
demand’ scenario as they support the efficient provision of useful services
consumers, service providers, and research organisations around the world:
like mobility and thermal comfort. They are also enablers of the emerging
shift in consumer culture away from owning things and towards accessing
Countries like Chile, Japan and France which have used standards and
services. This shift has already happened in how we consume media, and
codes to continually ratchet up the energy and material efficiency of
is now starting to reshape how we use and consume transport services,
buildings and consumer goods.
consumer goods, and building space. The ubiquitous smartphone is the multi-
functional device which – if it continues to displace the need for dozens of
Cities like Vienna, Montreal and Sydney which have integrated shared
single-purpose devices (from radios and TVs to music systems and cameras)
mobility providers into their municipal transport infrastructures.
– could deliver 100-fold reductions in power consumption when in use or 30-
Neighbourhoods like Pecan Street, Brooklyn and North Portland which fold reductions when on standby.23
have provided living labs for new peer-to-peer business models for
electricity trading, tool sharing, and product exchange.
S E V E N S T R AT E G I E S
C E N T R A L TO T H E
‘ LOW E N E R GY D E M A N D ’
SCENARIO
1 Electrify energy end-use including

vehicles and heat pumps to improve
end-use efficiency.
2 Digitalise energy-using products

and services to optimise infrastructure
and resource use.
3 Converge onto fewer numbers of multi-functional

goods to improve service quality and convenience.
The central insight of the low energy demand scenario is that dramatically downsizing the per year to 2050, the low energy demand scenario removes any need to rely on carbon
global energy system by scaling-up tried and tested solutions brings the decarbonisation capture and storage as well as negative emission technologies. The energy supply
challenge well within the reach of available low-carbon energy technologies. If renewables diversifies rather than relentlessly expands, and fossil-fuels are phased out.
continue to grow at their current double-digit annual rates to 2030, and then at 5-10%
4 Shift from ownership to usership

to reduce material needs.
5 Utilise consumer goods, vehicles and physical infrastructures at

higher rates to accelerate the introduction of improved alternatives.
6 Innovate business models offering low-energy services to

appeal to consumers while making sense commercially.
7 Tighten efficiency standards continually up-

wards to deliver cost, performance, health
and other benefits.
SCALING THE More ambitious country targets and policies

The IPCC 1.5°C report has sparked a first wave of action among nations to
S O LU T I O N S legislate for targets to reach “net zero” as soon as possible, and at the latest
by 2050. Progress is promising, but must spread to other countries rapidly.
The next pages introduce the most important levers Eleven countries in the European Union are now discussing a 1.5°C
accelerating the transformation. All of these are target for their economies.
presented in greater depth in the section Scaling the
Norway, Finland, Sweden and the UK have now agreed targets to
Transformation reach net zero emissions by 2030, 2035, 2045 and 2050 respectively.
Developing countries like Costa Rica and Fiji have declared they will
be carbon neutral by 2050.
In 2018, Portugal’s CO2 emissions fell 9% and Ireland’s dropped 7%,
while their economies grew.
In 2019, the UK and Ireland declared climate emergencies. In 2018,

Ireland announced plans to divest its national investment fund from
fossil-fuels – the first nation to make this commitment.
Emissions have peaked and are now decreasing in 49 countries (accounting

for 36% of global greenhouse gas emissions).21 In 18 developed countries
(representing 28% of global emissions), CO2 emissions declined at an average
rate of 2.4% per year between 2005 and 2015.22 These sustained declines
in CO2 emissions are associated with concerted policy efforts to support
renewable energy and switch away from carbon-intensive fuels, improve
energy efficiency and reduce energy demand.
“We need to step up ambition These positive examples do come with caveats. These modest declines
occurred during the global financial crisis when economies slumped and the
quite radically. We are rise in emissions slowed globally. Most of the progress to date has been made
in the energy sector. Other economic sectors – food, transport, buildings
not talking about a small and industry – have not been sufficiently addressed, so transforming these
sectors would result in significantly faster emissions declines. Moreover,
incremental approach.” country legislation to reach net zero by 2050 often allows purchase of carbon
credits. Ultimately, this creative accounting must go: countries must actually
reach net zero.
Luis Alfonso de Alba
United Nations Secretary General’s envoy on climate change
This is a critical moment in international policy. In 2020, nations are required ALREADY NEGATIVE
to raise their climate ambition and declare this through enhanced Nationally BHUTAN
Determined Contributions (NDCs) under the Paris Agreement. Such pledges SURINAME
must aim for net zero by 2050 and pathways in line with carbon law. This
greater ambition must be combined with coherent policy to accelerate the
IN LAW
pace of change to ignite and accelerate rapid system transformation. Policies
NORWAY 2030
should support low-carbon solutions while discouraging carbon-intensive
SWEDEN 2045
processes and lifestyles.
UNITED KINGDOM 2050
FRANCE 2050
Policies that support a rapid transition to a 1.5°C world include:
Remove fossil-fuel subsidies and revise agricultural subsidies. PROPOSED LEGISLATION

CHILE 2050
Establish a price for carbon at a sufficient price level, and apply it globally. NEW ZEALAND 2050
Ensure that national decision-making, budgets, tax systems and

technology strategies are aligned with a 1.5°C world. IN POLICY DOCUMENT
URUGUAY 2030
Develop sector-wide roadmaps in energy, transport, buildings, food, FINLAND 2035
agriculture and industry to halve carbon emissions by 2030 and reach ICELAND 2040
net zero by 2050. DENMARK 2050
PORTUGAL 2050
Legislate for higher standards on emissions, efficiency and
COSTA RICA 2050
performance across all industries and accelerate the next generation
zero/low-carbon solutions. FIJI 2050
MARSHALL ISLANDS 2050
Set stop dates for fossil-fuel extraction and use.
Connect technology strategies to climate strategies, allowing for TARGETS UNDER DISCUSSION
mutual reinforcement. EUROPEAN UNION 2050
GERMANY 2050
Adopt and accelerate circular, digital and sharing economies, directed THE NETHERLANDS 2050
towards decarbonisation. SPAIN 2050
IRELAND 2050
Incentivise a shift in behaviour towards healthy diets, cycling and
public transport.
Figure 7. Momentum towards net zero by 2050
Promote nature-based solutions including the creation of carbon sinks
More countries are discussing high-ambition policies to reach net zero emissions by 2050
and enhance biodiversity.
or earlier. While this is a positive step, many rely on purchase of carbon credits. In addition
Ensure climate policies are fair – protecting vulnerable communities to the countries listed, other countries are discussing “Green New Deals” for example the
without violating planetary boundaries. United States, though cross-party political acceptance is likely to prove challenging. Data:
adapted from the Energy and Climate Information Unit.
Leadership and movements Citizen movements

Cities, companies and citizens have a critical role to drive momentum In early 2019, fuelled by growing anger and frustration at those in power
to accelerate the solutions required to follow the carbon law pathway. reneging on their promises and responsibilities to tackle climate disruption,
Cities and companies have direct control over about 35% of greenhouse gas schoolchildren walked out of school to strike in cities around the world.
emissions. Policymakers can work with these groups to nurture engagement The students describe climate change as an emergency and have demanded
with climate action. In the last 12 months there has been policymakers set stronger targets. The root cause of the school strikes is
a step-change in public action on climate, as well as city, company and intergenerational inequity – the costs of stabilising Earth’s climate will be
investor momentum. But this needs to expand further and faster to reach borne by the next generation if deep cuts are not made immediately.
the critical mass with the high climate ambition required. For the first time, we now have a voice for future generations.
The movement is having a noticeable impact and has the potential to be

a significant tipping point in social attitudes to climate action. The secretary
general of OPEC, Mohammed Barkindo, has said that the growing mass
mobilisation against oil is beginning to “dictate policies and corporate
decisions, including investment in the industry”.24
Research shows schoolchildren strongly influence parental attitudes25

indicating that the new movement may begin to challenge existing societal
norms. Moreover, the school strikes reflect a perceptible shift in worldviews.
According to a recent 26-nation survey by the Pew Research Centre, people
around the world agree that climate change poses a severe risk to their
countries. In 13 of those countries, people listed climate change as the
top international threat, above Islamic terrorism, cyberattacks and Russia.26
Cities
Cities are concentrations of human ingenuity, and for the 1.5°C revolution
“The youth are sending they must be engaged. 70 cities now receive over 90% of their energy from
renewable sources.27 Indeed, on their own, cities and other subnational
a clear and unmistakable entities have the power to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by about one
message: This is third by 2030, according to one scenario.19
an emergency.” Many cities are using their political might to work together to drive up ambition.
9,138 cities (representing 10% of the global population) have made

climate commitments to the Global Covenant of Mayors.
Patricia Espinosa
Executive Secretary, United Nations Framework 23 cities, including nine African cities, have already set net zero targets
Convention on Climate Change for 2050 or sooner.
At least 230 cities have set a 100% renewable goal in at least one sector.27 Finance
The G20’s Task Force on Climate Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) has
More than 200 cities representing 62 million people in Europe have
asked companies to disclose their exposure to climate risk. 160 companies
demanded the European Union adopts a net zero by 2050 policy.
overseeing US$86 trillion in assets support the initiative and another initiative,
Climate Action 100+, includes 360 investors with more than US$34 trillion in
221 cities have accepted WWF’s One Planet City Challenge in 2019
assets under management and aims to ensure the world’s largest corporate
signalling their commitment to being assessed against a 1.5°C target.
greenhouse gas emitters take necessary action on climate change. Since the
fossil-fuel divestment movement began in 2013, over 900 organisations with
19 major cities including London, New York, Tokyo and Stockholm have
assets worth about US$10 trillion have committed to divest from fossil-fuels.
committed to make new buildings net zero carbon by 2030 (C40).
More significantly, 34 central banks have joined forces to ensure a smooth

transition to a low-carbon economy through the Network for Greening the
Companies Financial System (NGFS). This network, including the Bank of England and the
Businesses are also beginning to act. Over 600 major companies have Banque de France, represents half of global greenhouse gas emissions. In 2019,
committed to science-based targets aligned with the Paris Agreement. At it provided a series of recommendations for all central banks to avoid a climate-
least 27 large companies (with revenues in excess of US$1 billion) have driven “Minsky moment” – the term for an abrupt collapse in asset prices.
committed to net zero emissions by 2050 at the latest. Ikea, Unilever and Telia
Company plan to reach net zero emissions by 2030 and Verizon by 2035.
However, only 15% of the Fortune 500 companies have set targets aligned
with the Paris Agreement, and far fewer have set targets aligned with a 1.5°C
world. Initiatives to halve emissions through the value chain, in line with the
carbon law – must scale rapidly and encourage companies of all sizes to reach
their full potential, not the bare minimum.
But the role of the business sector goes much further than reducing the direct
emissions. The business proposition as such has an even stronger impact and
businesses must make sure they align with a 1.5°C world. This goes hand in
hand with new, exponential business opportunities as markets shift. Already
many start-ups have positive climate impact at their core and front-running
companies has started to change their offerings and actively influence
industries, customers and policy makers.
Exponential Technologies Artificial Intelligence can be applied to design products for re-purpose,
sharing, re-use and recycling as the new default.
From digitalisation to robotics and synthetic biology, a technological
revolution is underway and artificial intelligence, cloud computing,
Deforestation can now be predicted and detected through digital solutions
5G and the Internet of Things (IoT) are poised to create further disruption
which helps take proactive action, and to monitor and improve agriculture,
in the next decade.
reforestation and peatland restoration.
The digital revolution may be the biggest wildcard in the economic
Through the use of Internet of Things, AI, 5G and digital-twin technology,
transformation. It can influence whether we end up on a 1.5°C planet or a
the need for more roads and physical infrastructure can be dramatically
world 3-4°C warmer – Hothouse Earth. Reaching net zero emissions by 2050
reduced through optimising existing infrastructure.
will require rapid transitions across all economic sectors and a shift towards
sustainable consumption, increasingly mediated by technology. This means
the digital revolution is an essential tool to support societal goals.28, 29
Supporting societal goals
Exponential technological development can considerably reduce energy While digitalisation and emerging technologies can contribute to reducing
consumption and material waste in all sectors, while supporting global health, greenhouse gas emissions, many online platforms could be better utilised
sustainability and economic goals. It can also enable rapid transformation for the benefits of society. Platforms such as social media, search and
through new disruptive business models. eCommerce now influence the behaviour of about four billion consumers and
producers every day – over half the population of the planet.
When it comes to applying the carbon law, the digital sector has the potential
to directly reduce fossil-fuel emissions 15% by 203030 and indirectly support As well as influencing consumer behaviour – advertising revenue is now
a further reduction of 35% through influence of consumer and business predominantly about online presence – these platforms now increasingly
decisions and systems transformation. influence the flow of information in the world. This is influencing democratic
processes by enabling disinformation campaigns and algorithmic
For example: propaganda – but also offers opportunities to accelerate the climate
movement.
Solar, wind, storage and smart grid technology supported by digital
solutions, will enable electrification, decentralisation and greening of While some of the leading technology companies have ambitious internal
the energy system. sustainability targets, the conversation about how they use their influence
to support the rest of society is less well developed. Given the power of
Energy usage in buildings can be brought down by increased space digital platforms, it is time for a new social contract between them and
utilisation through new digitally enabled sharing models. society. Specifically for these companies, this means starting with a strong
commitment to using technology for the good of society, promising to make
Mobility as a service, electrification, and autonomous vehicles connected low-carbon solutions the default, enabling shifts to low-carbon consumption,
to one another can tap the value of unused vehicles. and promoting fact-based worldviews.
Digitalisation can improve delivery by optimising shipments, routes and To avoid unintended consequences from technology, the potential
traffic systems. impacts of early-stage innovations should be assessed and learnt from.
Innovations with high positive climate-impact potential must be strongly
supported in the coming decade.31
“Preventing irreversible climate

disruption is the race of our lives,
and for our lives. It is a race that
we can and must win.”
António Guterres
UN Secretary-General
TRANSFORMING
SECTORS
ENERGY SUPPLY
DO SOLUTIONS EXIST TO HALVE ANNUAL

EMISSIONS IN THIS SECTOR GLOBALLY?
Yes, as the cost of solar and wind electricity has fallen in the
last few years and storage is following a similar trajectory, it is
possible for this sector to halve emissions at a low or no cost.
CAN THIS BE ACHIEVED BY 2030?
Yes. If the growth of wind and solar photovoltaics continues at

earlier best rates, the world’s energy emissions are on track to
halve by 2030.
WHAT ARE THE BARRIERS TO ACHIEVING IT?
Institutional constraints, current energy systems design, market

control by incumbents, and policies that favour conventional
fossil-fuel technologies and business models.
HOW CAN THOSE BARRIERS BE REDUCED

OR ELIMINATED?
Removing fossil-fuel subsidies, access to institutional capital

for clean energy investments, modernised grid infrastructure,
and decentralisation of power production. Fair pricing of carbon
emissions will also accelerate the transition.
C U R R E N T S I T UAT I O N T R A J E C TO RY
ENERGY SUPPLY
Energy use is responsible for about two thirds of global greenhouse gas
emissions, which is made up of 32 Gt of annual CO2 emissions, plus 3.3 Gt of
CO2 equivalent emissions (CO2e) from other greenhouse gases.1 This chapter
addresses the 18.46 Gt CO2e per year that the sector can directly influence, 18.5
which is 34% of total global emissions. This comprises 12.4 Gt of direct
emissions from electricity and heat production for other sectors, and 6.1 Gt of
the sector’s own emissions associated mainly with extraction, refineries and 75% 75%
distribution of fossil-fuels. The remaining 17 Gt of emissions from fuel use in
other sectors, such as gasoline use in cars or coal in industry, are not included
Annual emissions
Annual emissions
here but covered in other sectors. In 2017, energy sector emissions grew
1.6%, with an average growth of 1.1% per year in the last decade.2
50% 50%
After being relatively constant for decades, the market share of fossil-fuels Solar photovoltaics 9.2
(and therefore the CO2 intensity of electricity generation) has decreased over
the last few years due to growth of renewable energy. Concentrated solar power
25% Wind power 25%
Other low−carbon energy
Reduced methane emissions
2020 2025 2030

Year
Figure 8. Energy Supply

Estimated 50% reduction of annual emission proposed for energy supply sector by 2030.
The diagram includes both the sectors’ own baseline emissions of 6.1 Gt CO2e and the
additional 12.4 Gt emissions from electricity and heat production for other sectors.
FOOD NATURE-BASED
ENERGY INDUSTRY BUILDINGS TRANSPORT
CONSUMPTION SOLUTIONS
S O LU T I O N S F O R panels. Global installed solar PV capacity has expanded from 0.8 GW in 2000
to 500 GW by the end of 2018, with the highest relative growth – almost 80%
F I R S T H A LV I N G in a year – in 2011.8 Since then, global growth has slowed slightly to 20–25%
per year in the last two years. China surpassed Germany in 2014 as leader
in installed capacity, with Japan, the US and Germany now competing for
For the energy sector, the solutions to halve emissions by 2030 are available second place.
and a transition has begun. Improved energy efficiency in all sectors (covered
in more detail in subsequent chapters), is by itself economically important, To contribute to the 2030 goals for the energy supply sector, we estimate that
but the halving in this chapter refers to emissions generated directly by the solar should continue growing exponentially at a pace of 20-25% per year,
supply of energy. That consists of emissions from extraction, refineries and reaching ~6,000 TWh/yr and reducing emissions in the sector by 4 Gt/yr in
distribution of fossil-fuels (6.06 Gt) and the generation of electricity and heat 2030. This rate represents less than half of the highest historical growth rates,
(12.46 Gt). In order to achieve rapid decarbonisation to 2030, global primary meaning that solar energy could potentially drive emissions down even faster.
energy demand should be reduced, in line with the low energy demand
(LED) scenario.3 This is achieved by efficiency gains in energy conversion,
in industry, transport and buildings. In our scenario we assume electricity
consumption to be flat in 2020–2030 as increasing electrification and number
of end users make up for efficiency gains and savings elsewhere.
Today, almost a billion people lack access to electricity4 while 3.3 million
people die prematurely each year from outdoor air pollution – mainly as
a result of the burning of fuels.5,6 The climate solutions presented here
contribute to achieving UN Sustainable Development Goal 7 on affordable Solar photovoltaics in India
and clean energy, as well as other goals.
India plans to build 100 GW of
solar capacity by 2022 to meet
There are five key solutions that can play major roles and scale sufficiently its Paris Agreement commitments.
fast – solar photovoltaics, concentrated solar power, wind power, reduced
methane leakage, and grid flexibility and storage. We’ll look at each in turn. 50% of all new energy capacity
in India came from solar in 2018.
Solar photovoltaics (PV)

Solar PV uses the physical properties of materials to convert sunlight into
electricity. PV panels can supply local systems or regional grids. They can be
put on buildings or on the ground. It is possible that solar electricity one day Massive Chinese solar
will provide more than all current energy use globally – sunlight is capable of capacity
providing about 1,000,000 TWh annually, which is 6,000 times our current In the last two years alone, 98 GW
total energy use.7 of solar PV have been added to China’s
electrical grid.
Photovoltaics is capable of both exponential cost reductions and exponential The installed capacity of grid-
capacity growth. That growth is not currently limited by the construction of connected solar PV in China has more
than 1,000-doubled in a decade.
power plants, but by the construction of factories producing solar cells and
Concentrated solar power (CSP) Wind power

Concentrated solar power works in a different way to solar photovoltaics. Wind power is a larger source of electric power than solar PV and one of the
Sunlight from a large area is focused on a small receiver using mirrors or least costly generation technologies per unit of energy. Wind can be deployed
lenses. The heat generated is then used to drive a turbine or Stirling engine. on land (onshore) or at sea (offshore), and when connected to the grid, wind
Unlike photovoltaics it needs direct sunlight to collect energy, and so is mainly power can be produced without subsidies.
used in arid regions. On the other hand, the energy collected can be stored as
heat and used to produce power at night. These plants are therefore able to
balance daily fluctuations in the energy system and complement solar PV. Wind power growth in
Portugal
CSP grew on average ~60% per year between 2009 and 2014,9 mainly due to Between 2001 and 2018, Portugal
incentive schemes in Spain, the US and Italy. The withdrawal of some of these rapidly increased national capacity
schemes, together with competition from solar PV (which now has a lower for wind power. 24.3% of its electricity
is now provided by wind.
cost per installed capacity and electricity produced),10 has driven investors
away and caused a slowing of growth in cumulative CSP capacity. Portugal produces 55% of its yearly
electricity from renewables.
CSP can still contribute a significant portion of renewable energy when

solar PV has satisfied daytime demand, and its relatively low-cost storage
capability provides a competitive advantage. The analysis in this report Several countries have successfully reduced their carbon emissions by
assumes a scenario where new policies allow for exponential growth of 40% transitioning to wind power. Wind power sustained exponential growth at rates
per year until 2030. This contributes to a reduction of CO2e in the sector by above 20% annually between 2000 and 2013, increasing electricity generation
0.4 Gt/yr in 2030. CSP can also provide industrial heat, in place of fossil gas, from 31.5 TWh/yr to 640 TWh/yr. By the end of 2018 there was almost 0.6 TW
oil or electricity. of installed wind power capacity that today is capable of generating 5% of
global electricity – around 1300 TWh/year. Future technical potential for wind
energy, like solar, may be greater than current global energy use.
To cut energy supply emissions in half by 2030, wind power generation

should continue growing at a pace of just above 10% per year, reaching above
4000 TWh/yr and reducing emissions in the sector by 2.0 Gt. As with solar
PV, this is slower than past growth rates, meaning that the technology could
potentially drive down emissions even faster.
The Gemasolar tower
The Gemasolar plant in Spain

concentrates sunlight onto a tower,
producing 80 GWh of power per year.
Using molten salt heat storage,

the tower can produce power
for 15 hours without sunlight.
Other low-carbon energy mechanisms based on blockchain. With abundant use of low cost renewables,
power transmission will also become more important to supply areas of high
New nuclear, hydro, wave-power, geothermal, and biomass-fuelled heat/power
power demand, such as large cities and industrial regions, from areas with
cogeneration capacity will also contribute to emissions reductions in energy
abundant renewable energy resources.
supply. Scaling these to 2030, it is estimated that their combined contribution
will be 0.92 Gt per year, with none of them contributing more than 0.22 Gt each.
As renewable electricity is becoming available in parts of the world at a lower
cost than the price of fossil-fuels, electricity may be used to produce so-
Grid flexibility and storage called “electrofuels”. These are a type of energy storage or flexible demand
The energy sector has not yet been disrupted by digital technology in that by 2030 may have started to have an impact, but the scale of that impact
the same way as other sectors. Often energy systems are operated as is still difficult to quantify.11,12
politically backed monopolies. Such institutional settings tend to operate
conservatively, rather than being open to innovation. With increasing production from intermittent power sources and a need to
substitute gas turbines and other fossil-fuel power for balancing the grid,
However, there is great potential to cut emissions through the use of new batteries are a key component of a decarbonised energy system. Batteries
technologies. Power electronics and batteries can provide stability. Real- are already today balancing grids at low cost, while also making the growth
time pricing and web-controlled appliances give customers opportunities to of decentralised power and even 24/7 off-grid solar electricity possible.
reduce cost by being more flexible in their demand, which will help efficiently
stabilise the grid. Distributed electricity generation may benefit from trading A key issue is cost, but batteries are becoming cheaper to produce as
demand from the automotive industry has increased the scale of production.
Bloomberg New Energy Finance estimates that global battery capacity
will grow exponentially, doubling every 28 months from 2016 to 2030.13
Germany’s flexible grid
This would mean a capacity in 2030 of 125 GW/305 GWh. Acknowledging
uncertainty, we assume that storage together with technologies for more
The German network operator 50Hertz
has shown that it’s possible to run a flexible and optimised grids will decrease the use of fossil-based electricity
grid with a renewables share of 56.5%. by 10% by 2030. This reduces emissions by 1.6 Gt per year by 2030.
Germany has set a goal of
63% renewable power by 2030.
Wind power in Denmark Solar power law

Strong national policies have allowed
Denmark to generate 44% of its California has approved a law
grid power from wind – the highest requiring homes built after 2020
proportion in the world. to use solar power.
Denmark aims to have 100% It is estimated that installations will

renewable energy for heat and power grow 80% in new homes compared
by 2035. to the current rate.
Reduced methane leakage

Methane is a strong greenhouse gas – about 30 times more potent than South Australia battery
CO2– which leaks out when fossil-fuels are extracted and during transport of
fossil methane gas in pipes or as liquified natural gas on ships. Conservative South Australia’s Tesla battery has
paid back a third of its cost in the first
estimates of methane emissions from oil, gas and coal extraction and year through services provided to the
distribution run to about 2.7Gt CO2e. local grid.
The 100 MW/129 MWh battery

Solutions to reduce a significant portion of this leakage are generally was the biggest in the world.
available, and many are profitable, but aren’t applied at a large scale because
return on investment is considered too low. Stronger policy, and better
monitoring techniques can help close the gap.
Available technologies to accomplish this include optical or portable Crowdfunding solar power
measurement tools, and drones to detect and monitor leaks. Machine learning Trine connects small-scale investors
can help make sense of the large amounts of data already available. Reducing with solar power entrepreneurs in
East Africa. To date €25,647,968 have
leaks is often both profitable and environmentally beneficial. been invested in solar energy.
544,077 people have been provided
With appropriate policy, industry cooperation and application of the latest
with renewable electricity through
technology, emissions of methane from oil and gas could be reduced by the scheme.
0.45 Gt CO2e by 2030, which would also come with a net economic gain.14
The full technical potential is almost three times as high. Reduction of
methane leakage should be seen as a complementary, short-term solution
that can be applied to rapidly cut emissions related to fossil energy while
the main strategy is to replace all fossil energy.
Methane leaks from byproducts in agriculture and waste in landfills can

also be collected and used to replace fossil gas. Such opportunities may
be significant globally, but are not quantified here.
AC C E L E R ATO R S
Climate leadership Policy Exponential technology
Demanding 100% renewable electricity, both Energy supply and distribution is often a Renewable technologies like wind, solar PV and
through on-site generation and direct purchase politicised sector because of its role as a CSP, and battery storage become substantially
from the market, is an important step that cities, strategic resource for national security, societal cheaper over time as industrial experience
businesses and individuals can take to transition stability and industrial competitiveness. Today, accumulates. Solar PV has dropped in price by
the energy system towards cleaner sources of the low-carbon options described above can an order of magnitude in the last ten years and
power. 40 cities around the globe, as well as serve all these purposes as well as, if not better the cost of lithium-ion batteries have fallen
182 large companies, have signed up for 100% than, conventional energy systems. by almost 80% in seven years.17 This trend
renewable energy targets in the RE100 initiative, will continue. The exponential nature of these
and these numbers are growing.15 Access to Policymakers can speed up the energy transition technologies has tended to be underestimated
renewable energy is also becoming an important while caring for people whose livelihoods in the past and should not be in the future.18
decision criterion for progressive businesses. are disrupted in the process. Ways to do so
include removing fossil-fuel subsidies, with Operating power grids with a high level of
But that’s not all – cities, businesses and pension compensation for lowest income households, predictable but not controllable solar and wind
funds can divest from fossil-fuels and move and withdrawing support for infrastructure power is often said to be difficult. However, the
assets in order to close the investment gap in investments like pipelines and fossil-fuel power experience of grid systems operators in Germany
new renewable energy instead. Corporations, plants. Taxing fossil-fuels based on their external and Denmark, where around half of the energy is
individuals and organisations can also accelerate environmental costs will also accelerate the supplied by such sources, is that they can work
the transition by investing in local renewable transition. As new renewable energy is already well even without significant storage.
energy solutions such as rooftop solar heating competitive or close to competitive, this will
and PV, and through peer-to-peer lending. not significantly increase energy costs. Carbon There is evidence suggesting that energy
Bundling of projects to meet risk criteria may help pricing schemes, however, must be designed systems could go to an 80% share of variable
financial institutions to participate. in a way that they are considered fair.16 renewables at low cost with current technologies,
enough to halve emissions by 2030.19 An energy
Policymakers must also facilitate system system that is 100% powered by variable
changes. Regulations designed for an inflexible renewables would require a host of solutions
one-directional power supply system should such as flexible power consumption by heating,
be replaced by flexible solutions where people automotive batteries and fuel production to
and companies can contribute to decentralised balance surplus low-cost electricity.
energy supply and grid balancing.
Finally, coordination of research and innovation

processes can accelerate the development of
competitive renewable energy technology.
ROA D M A P 2 0 1 9 – 2 0 3 0
2019–2025 2025–2030 2030+
Investments in fossil-fuel infrastructure and technology should drop rapidly. Investments in fossil-fuel infrastructure Strong emphasis on
restricted. phasing out fossil
leadership
Investments are moved to renewables, with companies, cities, regions and

Climate
technologies.
individuals driving demand. Global renewable energy finance redirected to
underserved locations with high gains from rapid
Access to clean energy becomes a key competitive factor for regions
energy transition.
attracting businesses.
Fossil-fuel subsidies eliminated. Carbon pricing and supportive emission Support for
standards are universal. novel renewable
Carbon pricing in most markets.
technologies like
Fossil-fuel bans begin to be implemented by
Supportive emission standards established. wave power and
cities and nations.
power-to-gas.
All public financing of fossil-fuel energy through, for example, development
Restrictive policies introduced for new fossil-fuel
banks or export credits, has been phased out. If necessary, support
infrastructure.
for biomass with
Stricter regulation of oil and gas supply to decrease methane leakage. carbon capture and
Measures to address social and economic
Policy
Policy packages to accelerate innovation and market share of renewables. impacts, as well as energy poverty. storage technology
and new nuclear
De-risking policies to improve access to finance for renewables, particularly New transmission infrastructure roll-out and fission or fusion.
decentralised and in developing countries. legal frameworks in place for grid integration of
decentralised renewable energy.
Begin construction of sustainable strategic long-range transmission
infrastructure as well as low-voltage network expansion for decentralised R&D efforts in new renewables, battery
renewable electricity generation. technologies, power-to-gas, and biomass with
carbon capture.
Measures to address social and economic impacts, as well as distribution
opportunities.
PV, wind and CSP continue to grow at least half as fast as historic rates. Breakthrough of distributed, renewable and more Technologies for
Battery technologies continue scaling up rapidly. resilient energy systems. advanced grid
Exponential
technology
balancing maturing
Accelerated innovation in renewable energy and grid balancing. Creative solutions emerge to handle price
and widely adopted.
variations caused by the transition from
Exponential growth of distributed renewable energy production/storage in
traditional centralised systems to renewable-
buildings and industries
based distributed systems.
T H E WAY F O RWA R D
In many places, not hindering the exponential trajectories for wind, solar
photovoltaics and battery storage will be enough to achieve a halving of emissions
by 2030. In less experienced markets, however, support is still needed to reach a
point where solar and wind energy can be supplied at lower costs than fossil-fuels.
Where conditions are suitable, solar CSP can return to

the growth figures it saw in 2009–2014, providing grid-
balancing services as a complement to solar PV and wind.
Grid infrastructure should be regulated to allow for decentralised power production,

and new interconnections between regions should be added to utilise potential cost
reductions in generation. Fair grid access and transparent competitive markets for
balancing power are important for renewable energy developers.
Fundamental policies for a rapid and smooth transition from fossil to

renewable energy will include removing subsidies from fossil-based power
plants and infrastructure, introducing CO2 taxation and minimising the social
and economic impact on individuals who lose out in the transition.
Investment and research in new zero-carbon Climate leaders among cities, businesses, housing
energy storage and generation technologies, communities and individuals should demand 100%
such as wave power, must be sustained to renewable electricity and consider investing in their
achieve the reductions necessary beyond 2030. own renewable energy production.
INDUSTRY

Yes. By improving materials recirculation and production

efficiency, cutting waste, adopting renewable energy and rapid
scaling up of circular design and business models.
Yes. Halving emissions is feasible by 2030 as current practices

are highly wasteful and the emissions savings from renewable
energy and circular economies are largely untapped.
Lack of strong policy, weak investment, insufficient demand

from customers, inertia and slow rates of innovation are the
major obstacles.

OR ELIMINATED?
Incentives for industry to shift to low-carbon solutions and

design for circular economies. A critical mass of climate
leadership, innovation and strong customer demand. Access
to renewable energy and circular economy infrastructure.
ENERGY SUPPLY INDUSTRY
The industrial sector is responsible for 17 Gt CO2e annually, which represents
32% of the global total. This figure can be split into two parts. First, energy-
intensive heavy industries which include materials manufacturing that
18.5 emissions: steel, cement, plastics, aluminium and
represent substantial 17.1
chemicals. Second, less energy-intensive light industry, such as fashion,
furniture and home appliances.
75% 75% 75%
Heavy industry has grown exponentially in emissions for several decades.
Industrial emissions reached a new all-time high in 2018, and are anticipated
Annual emissions
Annual emissions
Annual emissions
to grow further unless measures to reverse the trend are applied rapidly
across sectors and regions. In a business-as-usual scenario, demand for
50% goods is expected to rise as the global middle class swells from
industrial 50% 50%
Solar
3.2 billion in 2016 to aphotovoltaics
projected 5.2 billion by 2030.1 9.2 Materials recirculation 8.6
Concentrated
With 60% of the solar power
global population expected to live in urban areas by Product materials efficiency
2030, growing cities will fuel demand for building materials.2 Without rapid
25%
transformationWind
of the power
sector, concrete, steel and plastics alone will easily 25% Production efficiency 25%
Other low−carbon
eat up the 1.5°C carbon energy
budget.3 As an example, in 2019, the production and Circular business models
incineration of plastic will produce more than 850 Mt of greenhouse gases –
Reduced
equal to the emissions frommethane
189 large coalemissions
power plants.4 Refrigerant management
However, a number of large industrial companies are setting climate
targets2020
and implementing circular business2025
models, and low-carbon 2030 2020 2025 2030
materials are becoming common in all types Year
of products. Companies are Year
realising that new strategies aligned with the Paris Agreement can deliver
a competitive advantage.
Figure 9. Industry
49.5% reduction of the annual emissions of the industry sector by 2030,
which includes reduction of 2.6 Gt (31%) electricity and heat-related emissions.
FOOD NATURE-BASED
S O LU T I O N S F O R Material recirculation, efficiency and substitution

Wealthy nations frequently use more materials than necessary – for example,
F I R S T H A LV I N G EU countries use an average of 800 kg of steel, concrete, aluminium and
chemicals per person per year.5,6,7 By reducing the amount of materials used,
The key solutions to reduce supply-side emissions in industry revolve around or increasing their usable lifetime, costs can be lowered at the same time as
a few key principles. Making products with less materials, recirculating emissions are reduced.
materials, replacing high-carbon materials with low-carbon ones, optimising
production processes and enabling a circular economy. Cutting emissions Additionally, reusing material which already has been produced is a key
associated with refrigerants is also an important factor. opportunity to reduce emissions. The amount of reclaimable material in
the world is steadily growing, and energy savings range from 60–75% for
This chapter will explore these solutions and how they can be accelerated using recycled, rather than new steel. The savings for steel are up to 90%.7
through policy, exponential technology and climate leadership. It will not Achieving these savings requires that products be designed specifically for
discuss innovations required for the second and third halvings, like using disassembly and recycling, that material contamination is avoided and that
hydrogen in steel and cement production. Nor will it address consumer material collection rates and processes are improved.
demand, which is covered in the climate leadership chapter.
Material recirculation
Neste offers a 100% renewable
alternative to crude oil in plastics
and chemicals production.
By using renewable raw materials the
plastics and chemicals producers are
able to decrease the carbon footprint
of their products.
Fossil-free food packaging Materials substitution

The food retail sector’s goal in
Sweden is for all plastic packaging Betolar turns different side streams
to be recyclable by 2022, and to be from energy, mining, steel and forestry
produced from renewable or recycled sectors into geopolymer-based
raw materials by 2030. construction materials.
Plastics will add 0.85 Gt greenhouse These materials substitute concrete

gases to the atmosphere in 2019. with up to 90% lower carbon footprint.
Production processes
Action on plastic While major efforts to reduce demand for steel, cement, plastics, aluminium
and other materials are essential, so too are emissions reductions from
Movements are growing to reduce improving the efficiency of production. The energy intensity of this sector
plastic use. France has pledged to use
only recycled plastic by 2025. could be reduced by up to 25% by 2030 by upgrading or replacing existing
equipment with the best available on the market. The adoption of renewable
Unilever has committed to 100% electricity and heating/cooling will provide further cuts. Additional reductions
reusable, recyclable or compostable
plastic packaging by 2025. of up to 20% of annual energy intensity are possible by measuring processes
and energy use in real time and using artificial intelligence techniques to
continually optimise them.3
Construction projects often use 30-50% more steel and cement than
necessary,6, 7 and increasing material efficiency across all industries is a
clear opportunity to reduce both emissions and costs. Large emission
reductions can also be achieved by substituting low-emission materials which
perform equally well or better than the high-emission materials they replace.
New directives and requirements, backed by improved design tools and
technology, will be necessary to turn these possibilities into reality.
Mining and minerals going

fossil-free
The Swedish mining and minerals
industry is aiming to make its mining
operations completely fossil-free
by 2035.
The sector currently accounts for
8% of Sweden’s total CO2 emissions.
Sustainable fashion Electric site

By July 2019, 90 companies, Volvo and Skanska’s Electric Site
representing 12.5% of the global research project is a test bed for
fashion market had signed the 2020 switching to electric autonomous
Circular Fashion System Commitment haulers in the quarrying industry.
to reduce waste.
The project has shown a 98%
Textile production causes 1.2 billion reduction in CO2 emissions, 70% in
tonnes of CO2e emissions annually. energy cost and 40% in operator cost.
Circular economy and closed-loop business models

More companies are adopting a circular economy model in their business
operations and supply chains. The Finnish innovation fund Sitra defines a
circular economy as maximising the circulation of products, components and
materials and the value bound to them as much as possible in the economy.
This goes beyond environmental benefits and creates real economic and
social benefits too.
A more circular economy could cut cumulative emissions from heavy industry
by 56% by 2050 in the EU, and 45% of cumulative emissions from the steel,
cement, plastic and aluminium products globally.5 Additionally, service-based
business models, where buildings, tools and vehicles which sit idle for 90%
of the time are unlocked for others to use, are another huge opportunity to
boost profits and reduce emissions simultaneously. These are addressed in
the building and transport chapters.
Circular strategy
IKEA has announced that all products
will be developed to be repurposed,
repaired, reused, resold, and recycled
and will only use renewable and
recyclable materials by 2030.
IKEAs goal is to be climate neutral
by 2030.
Circular business models
Apple has promised to adopt a 100%

circular business model, including
sourcing of zero-carbon aluminium
for its products, by 2024.
Daisy, Apple’s disassembly robot,

can rip apart 200 phones an hour.
Refrigerants
In the wake of the discovery of the hole in the ozone layer in 1984, UN
member states agreed to phase out the chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) refrigerants
that were causing the problem. In their place, many industries shifted to
hydrofluorocarbon (HFC) refrigerants, which cause less damage to the ozone
layer. However, HFCs happen to be powerful greenhouse gases, with a global
warming potential thousands of times higher than carbon dioxide and a long
lifespan in the atmosphere.
In Kigali, Rwanda in 2016, nations agreed to phase out these HFCs with some
countries starting in 2019. Doing so has the potential to reduce cumulative
emissions by the equivalent of 90 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide by 20508
making a significant contribution to meeting the Paris Agreement. More than
90% of the climate change impacts of HFCs can be avoided if emissions stop
by 2030.9 The treaty, ratified by 65 countries, entered into force on 1 January
2019, and is projected to reduce global warming by 0.4°C this century. Europe
and the US have committed to acting first – rapidly cutting HFC emissions
10% by 2019, while middle-income countries such as China and Brazil plan
to cap emissions in 2024.
However, the demand for cooling equipment is rising, not at least in

developing countries. Global warming is creating a vicious circle where
warmer air temperatures drive demand for more cooling. Low levels of
efficiency and high leakage rates of refrigerant gases with high global
warming potential will increase these emissions drastically.
Apart from tougher policy, a strong green cooling movement among both
suppliers and customers can rapidly reduce emissions by applying new
types of refrigerants and increase efficiencies.
Work clothing as service
Textile service company Lindström
offers work clothing as service. This way
the customer companies can pay a fixed
fee and receive clean, repaired, safe and
quality-requirements compliant clothing.
RFID tags are used to collect
data to enable optimal usage.
Climate leadership in this sector means Most countries have very weak emissions Digital technologies will be an essential driver
companies and coalitions acting as champions standards, and policies largely focus on of decarbonisation and cost savings across
to drive a rapid halving of emissions throughout information. This is not a successful strategy, industries, enabling great gains in material,
their value chains, creating a race to the top. and will not reduce emissions fast enough. energy, process and logistical efficiency.
Strong economic incentives are required in
Companies can also set strong requirements on order to reward low-emissions approaches and Zero-carbon design is vital – creating products
regions to provide renewable energy, and invest encourage high-emissions firms to put in place optimised for re-purpose, sharing, re-use
in production of clean electricity and heating. strong investment plans to dramatically cut and recycling. Using 5G and other network
An example of this is the RE100 initiative, which carbon dioxide. technologies for increased precision in
represents 190 companies with a combined manufacturing can save materials and energy.
US$4 trillion in revenue who are committed to One effective way to do this is through pricing
implementing 100% renewable energy.10 of emissions and credible national long-term Reverse logistics and real time tracing of material,
emission reduction targets which signal the long- components and products will make it possible
Industry-wide roadmaps aligned with the term direction. Strong investment programmes in to increase utilisation rates of consumer goods,
carbon law, developed in collaboration between low-carbon materials and processes are required vehicles and physical infrastructure. This will
suppliers, customers and governments, are to speed up the transition, and sectoral roadmaps allow the adoption of a sharing economy and
crucial. Examples include the UNFCCC textiles can help to pinpoint key barriers that need to circular business models, which will in turn cut
charter11 and Fossil Free Sweden’s 13 industrial be addressed with policy measures or in public- huge amounts of material waste. Finally, artificial
roadmaps.12 These roadmaps help identify private collaboration. intelligence techniques can be applied to rapidly
key barriers to be overcome to reach emission develop a new generation of ultra-low carbon
targets, and can accelerate decarbonisation Other strategies for policymakers include materials.14
across sectors. requirements that products are designed for
circularity, extended producer responsibility,
Early adopters of circular economy business making sure that infrastructure is in place for
models will be essential. This will drive more recycling, regulating what happens at the end of a
efficient use of materials, more high-quality product’s life, mandating material reuse, adapting
material recirculation, new production processes public procurement policies and more stringent
and service-based business models. waste regulation. The tax systems also need to
be adapted to support circular solutions. Finally,
bans on materials driving emissions and pollution,
such as single-use plastic items (banned in the
EU from 2021), can be implemented.13
ROA D M A P 2 0 1 9 – 2 0 3 0
2019–2025 2025–2030 2030+
Cities and nations adopt stringent emissions and efficiency standards All companies have set targets Strict emissions regulations in place,
to encourage rapid reductions in emissions from steel, cement, plastics to halve their annual emissions which also reduces air pollution and
leadership
and aluminium. by 2030 or earlier. promotes greater efficiencies.

Climate
Development of industry roadmaps across all sectors aligned with 1.5°C, Significant shift from ownership All construction is carbon neutral
creating a race to the top between companies. of products to “usership” for or even stores carbon.
transport, consumer goods
All leading companies have adopted
and commercial space, reducing
circular business models.
material consumption.
Policies and economic incentives put in place to reward All public procurement Requirements on low-carbon/
low-emissions strategies. committed to low-carbon fossil-free materials, production and
and a circular economy. circular material handling applied
Low-carbon public procurement standards become established
Policy
globally in policies.
and scale globally. Stringent emissions standards
now universal.
Companies are required to publish carbon footprint information
on their products and services. Strong public-private investment
initiatives in place with the goal
Companies take responsibility for the entire product life-cycle.
of 100% fossil-free materials.
Digitalisation transforms all industries, increasing energy and material Purchasing recommendations New innovations to remove remaining
efficiencies, and reducing carbon emissions. and decisions become more carbon in heavy industries such as
automated and factor steel and aluminium reach the market
Technology enables circular economies and usership-based business models.
Exponential
technology
in planetary boundaries and scale rapidly.

The Internet of Things allows greater traceability of materials and products, and national emissions
while artificial intelligence optimises processes for efficiency. reduction pledges.
E-commerce platforms and product search engines prioritise Alternative aluminium and
low-emissions products. cement production systems
reach market and scale rapidly.
Industrial design, engineering and architecture increasingly adopt low-
emissions options as default.
There is an urgent need for stronger policy and industry action to drive dramatically higher
material efficiency through circular business models. Decarbonisation of high-emission materials
might not add more than a few percent in cost, compared to end-user/consumer level price.6 It is
however important to note that an increase in near-term R&D investment in those industries will
be vital to enable the deep decarbonisation required for the second and third halvings.6
In the meantime, policymakers must focus on incentivising energy and material efficiency
through stringent standards and support for best available technologies, for example through
public procurement standards for construction projects, which can spread globally.
An immediate priority is to build out the infrastructure required for the

circular economy and accelerate reuse of materials through refunding
schemes, increased scrap collection and recycling rates.
Physical retailers and e-commerce platforms should develop strategies to incentivise low-
emissions products, recycling and longer product lifetimes. All manufacturing businesses
and industries should set ambitious targets to aim to halve emissions by latest 2030.
DIGITAL INDUSTRY

Yes, solutions exist and are being implemented by many

companies in the industry.
Yes. Emissions can be halved through investment in renewable

energy alone, and can be cut even further through improved
energy efficiency and bundling devices with renewable energy.
The main barrier is the low availability of renewable energy

in some countries, the geographical spread of infrastructure
and achieving a critical mass of digital companies.

OR ELIMINATED?
Policies to incentivise renewables. Global initiatives to ensure

that a broad majority of digital companies implement a carbon
law climate strategy.
DIGITAL INDUSTRY
In the last version of this report, the life cycle carbon footprint of the
information and communications technology (ICT) sector was estimated to be
730 Mt of CO2e (1.4% of the global total while using 3.6% of global electricity
for its operations), based on 2015 data. The entertainment and media (E&M)
sector’s electronic footprint was estimated at 420 Mt (0.8%) and the footprint 1.4
of traditional paper media 220 Mt (0.4%) .1 In this report, the ICT and E&M
sectors will collectively be referred to as the “digital industry” – which is a 75%
subsection of the “industry” sector previously described.
Annual emissions
Between 2010 and 2015, data traffic quadrupled and the number of mobile
subscribers increased by 30%. However, at the same time, their combined
emissions and the electricity used for operation both declined about 15%, 50%
while ICT emissions remained roughly constant.2 The main reason for this Device usage 0.68
development has been massive gains in energy efficiency and a shift in
computing from desktop and laptop to handheld devices. Similarly, the steady Manufacturing electricity
shift of entertainment experiences online means that the entertainment and
media industry’s ongoing emissions are also in decline. Ongoing research 25% Networks usage
based on more recent market statistics from industry analysts and ICT Data centres usage
companies suggests that these trends will continue.
Manufacturing other
Carbon emissions in the digital industry are expected to continue to drop
up to 2020, while total data traffic is forecast to increase. Beyond 2020,
discussions are ongoing between the International Telecommunication Union, 2020 2025 2030
GSM Association, Global e-Sustainability Initiative and the Science-Based Year
Targets Initiative to establish a decarbonisation pathway that supports
a 1.5°C trajectory for the ICT sector.
Figure 10. Digital Industry
Estimated 50% reduction of annual emissions for the digital industry sector
(including ICT and E&M) by 2030.
DIGITAL INDUSTRY
FOOD NATURE-BASED
S O LU T I O N S F O R Many of the largest technology companies, such as Google, Apple and

Microsoft, have already achieved or are close to 100% renewable electricity.1
F I R S T H A LV I N G However, outside of parts of the United States and the Nordic countries,
the picture is more diverse. Many regions still lack renewable production
capability, and network infrastructure – in contrast to data centres – needs
The digital industry has continually reduced its emissions for almost a a local presence to ensure universal access to telecommunications and the
decade,3 and both its strategies and its success in technological innovation internet. Still, based on extrapolation of current trends 1, we estimate that
may be instructive in other industries. Nonetheless, its remaining emissions about 100 TWh of the 600 TWh of electricity used by the digital industry will
must halve by 2030, and this chapter presents the most likely ways for the come from certified renewable sources by 2020.
industry to achieve this.
The most important solution is to use renewable electricity to power data

Data centres and networks
centres and networks. Already, the ICT industry is by far the largest purchaser As well as powering data centres and networks with renewable electricity –
of renewable energy.3 However, the industry must also continue to improve its either generated on-site or purchased from the grid – network operators can
energy performance and has the opportunity to further invest in its own energy do even more. The most forward-thinking networks are aiming for net zero
production, especially in regions where clean energy is not widely available. emissions from their operations – Verizon is aiming for net zero for its own
Increased collaboration with other sectors can accelerate the renewable transition. emissions by 2035, while Telia has set out to reach net zero emissions by
2030, including in its value chain.
To date, many ICT companies have set carbon reduction targets that have
resulted in large emissions reductions. Additionally, the digital industry can
be seen as a catalyst for transformative emissions reductions in other
sectors, due to already-existing technological low-carbon solutions for Mobile network efficiency
industry, consumers and cities. The energy performance of
networks improves continuously
Renewable electricity through modernisation programmes
and the integration of antennas and
Electricity is a key part of the emissions of many industries, but perhaps none base stations.
to such a great an extent as in the digital industry. Ensuring that its electricity Ericsson and Nokia have seen
comes from renewable sources is the most effective strategy to reduce those around 40% energy savings.
emissions fast and will have an impact across all parts of the industry.
Transitioning to A zero-carbon data centre

renewable energy
Google’s data centre in Hamina,
Apple has achieved 100% renewable Finland is built in an old paper mill
electricity for its operations worldwide. and uses water from the Baltic Sea
to cool servers.
23 suppliers committed
to clean energy. The data centre uses 100%
wind power.
Data centres and similar technical network sites benefit from efficiencies Manufacturing
of scale. Many smaller and older sites can be replaced by fewer centralised
The final key component of emissions in this industry is manufacturing.
facilities with optimised operations. Cooling is a major component of data
For networks and data centres this is a minor part of the overall footprint,
centre electricity use, so locating data centres in regions with a colder climate
but it is significant for devices. About two thirds of manufacturing-related
and with access to clean energy will lead to reduced emissions. The Nordic
emissions can be eliminated with a switch to 100% renewable electricity
countries are already attracting increased investments in large data centres
.1 The remaining third is more difficult to address, as it is split between
for these, and other, reasons. Another opportunity is the potential for reuse
materials, industrial processes, non-electrical energy and transportation.
of excess heat from data centres, which could be used in district heating
Possible strategies here include accelerating the development of alternatives
systems or similar.
to industrial gases with high global warming potential, rethinking materials
life cycle (including packaging), and a reduction in the use of air freight to
In many areas there is potential to replace multiple parallel legacy networks
transport goods.
(e.g., older telephony and cable TV networks) with new, efficient fibre-optic
or cellular networks which reduce maintenance needs and energy use. Many
network sites and their back-up power solutions could play an important role
in smart electrical grids, allowing for energy storage, backup and stabilisation.
Beyond measures to optimise the electricity usage of data centres

and networks, operators can also help to measure and reduce energy
consumption and emissions in other sectors, such as buildings, transport
strategies and fleet management.
Daring goals of
Devices a network operator
The introduction of the smartphone has had a profound impact on the digital
industry’s total environmental footprint. Functionalities which previously Telia has committed to zero waste
and net-zero emissions by 2030
required separate hardware, such as media players, clocks, calculators and across its entire value chain.
satellite navigation systems, have been replaced by one single material- and
energy-efficient device, which can be augmented and updated over time with It is using >90% renewable
electricity on core markets.
new features.
On the other hand, the electricity consumption of devices such as

smartphones, tablets and computers still remains a large part of the total
electricity consumption of the digital industry, and the decentralised nature Halving chip
of the power use of these devices means that shifting to 100% renewables manufacturing emissions
is a greater challenge. Until renewable electricity reaches most buildings on
Intel has quickly and drastically
the planet, it is important to develop new business models where devices are reduced the fluorinated gas emissions
purchased with renewable energy credits, which cover charging throughout from its chip manufacturing plants.
the life cycle of the device.
The firm will reduce emissions
from 2010 levels by 10% by 2020.
The digital industry is well-positioned to Digital companies are continuously seeking to The digital industry is expected to continue
decarbonise fast, due to its focus on innovation address energy efficiency due to competition to accelerate efficiency in data centres,
and the fact that its footprint is fairly small and and price pressure. What will accelerate this networks and manufacturing based on system
mainly associated with the use of electricity. With transition further, however, is strong policy in optimisations and hardware development. It can,
the right climate leadership, the digital industry the energy sector – to expand the availability if optimised for climate and resource efficiency,
can halve emissions rapidly and efficiently by of renewable electricity supply and achieve take an even larger role in accelerating the
2030, and likely go beyond this target. the emissions reductions needed for the next halving of global emissions by developing new
halving in the 2030s. performance and energy-efficient technology for
Globally, a critical mass of the digital industry other sectors. You can find more details on this
companies and their supply chains must align Increased transparency of the carbon footprint in the “Exponential technologies and solutions”.
their climate strategies and develop roadmaps and decarbonisation measures of digital products
to drive down emissions. The digital industry and services should be implemented in order
can accelerate this transformation by mandating to foster positive competition. But of greater
renewable energy when investing and expanding importance for emission reductions overall is
global operations, and building up its own probably how policymakers can ensure access
renewable electricity production capability. to digital infrastructure in other sectors, and
leverage the use of digital technology to help
Finally, this industry’s role as an enabler, as an these sectors reduce emissions.
innovator and as a provider of services and
solutions to other sectors is important and
must not be neglected. Many of the solutions
and platforms that allow other sectors to halve
emissions will originate from the digital industry,
which must therefore put its best minds towards
solving the climate crisis.
ROA D M A P 2 0 1 9 – 2 0 3 0
2019–2025 2025–2030 2030+
All digital companies set strong emissions reduction targets and increase Rapid increase in on-site renewable energy Digital companies
investments in renewable electricity production. production and grid purchase globally. become net
producers of
Digital industry companies stimulate innovation and creativity, especially Non-renewable energy used in production/
leadership
renewable
Climate
related to decarbonisation. manufacturing drastically reduced.

electricity.
Carbon footprint information for digital products and services is made
available for businesses and consumers.
Business models to decarbonise end-user device electricity consumption are
established.
Policy accelerates the use of renewable electricity in all markets and for all Renewable electricity made available for all Renewable
categories of users globally. production/manufacturing activities worldwide. electricity made
available throughout
Policy
value chains globally.
Next-generation hyperscale data centres, 5G networks and energy efficiency A majority of digital products are designed with All technology
techniques and management drive up efficiency further. circular economy in mind. products designed
with circular
Active dismantling of obsolete legacy networks. Establishment of standardised platforms for
economy in mind.
communication, automation and artificial
Exponential
Circular business models taking off.

technology
intelligence that other industries can use to Full connectivity

Innovation and development of technologies and platforms based on reduce their emissions. is implemented in
connectivity that support drastic carbon reduction across sectors. all industries and
seen as default
requirement in
products with a
climate impact
potential.
The digital industry has a strong head

start on emissions reductions, but this
is not a reason for complacency.
The most effective solution to reducing

emissions in the digital industry is a rapid
shift to 100% renewable electricity.
The digital industry should set requirements on suppliers and put positive pressure
on regions to halve emissions before 2030. As the largest buyers of renewable energy,
digital companies can take the lead in accelerating the renewables revolution globally.
Other solutions include replacing and dismantling legacy networks with more efficient
digital networks, rebuilding and/or moving data centres to regions with a larger share of
renewable electricity production, and rethinking packaging and transport.
However, the biggest role that the digital industry can play is in contributing to
more effective and transformative solutions to other sectors, influencing consumer
and producer behaviour and leading the transformation of our energy systems.
BUILDINGS

Yes, solutions exist to halve emissions for existing buildings,

and to ensure halved emissions in new buildings.
Yes, the technology and knowledge exist to rapidly reduce

carbon footprints for buildings by more than 50%.
Key issues include outdated regulations, lack of firm

requirements from customers and cities, the need for
investment capital for retrofitting and a projected need
for a large number of new buildings in the coming decades.

OR ELIMINATED?
With strong requirements for energy efficiency. By driving down

carbon footprints in existing buildings. With clear incentives
for using building space more efficiently and by incentivising
and enforcing low-carbon construction and strong energy
and greenhouse gas requirements in procurement.
INDUSTRY BUILDINGS
Annual emissions related to existing buildings were about 9.9 Gt CO2e in 2016,
and have decreased slightly since, with about 60% coming from residential
and 40% from non-residential buildings. Annual emissions related to building
17.1
construction, on the other hand, are increasing steadily and reached 3.7 Gt 9.9
CO2e in 2016.1
As 75%
of 2016, there were 235 billion square metres of building space globally, 75% 75%
which is more or less expected to double by 2050 in a business-as-usual
scenario. Energy use per square metre is reducing by about 1.5% each year,
Annual emissions
Annual emissions
Annual emissions
but this is offset by an increase in floor area of 2.3% per year.
This growth is mostly expected to come from China and India in the coming
50% 50% Reduced demand for 50%
9.2 decade, and Materials recirculation
Africa from 2040. 8.6 building space 4.6
Product materials efficiency Reduced energy use during operation
25% Production efficiency 25% Low-carbon heating and cooling 25%
Circular business models Double retrofitting
Refrigerant management Low−carbon construction
2030 2020 2025 2030 2020 2025 2030

Year Year
Figure 11. Buildings

53% reduction of the annual emissions of the buildings sector by 2030, which includes
reduction of 3.3 Gt (63%) electricity and heat-related emissions.
FOOD NATURE-BASED
S O LU T I O N S F O R Demand for building space can also be reduced by more efficient use of
space. This can be achieved either through more intense use per square
F I R S T H A LV I N G metre or per day. For example, implementing flexible seating (“hot desking”)
in offices can increase space utilisation, while using a school building for
non-school activities in the evenings would increase the level of use per day.
We spend most of our lives inside buildings, but their impact on the climate
is not sufficiently considered. This must change if emissions in this sector Residential buildings can be used more efficiently in similar ways by increasing
are to halve by 2030, but we’ll also need to get comfortable with using the number of residents per floor area or by an increase in the use of home
buildings in new ways. offices or short-term letting. Shared workspace solutions can provide more
than double the space efficiency compared to traditional office solutions.2
The sector is changing, in ways that are both positive and negative for a
halving of emissions. On the one hand, new technology is helping to lower
Reduced energy use during operation
energy use through better materials and digital control systems. But on the
other hand, the total area of buildings worldwide is growing rapidly – resulting The amount of operational energy used by a building can be reduced by
in emissions from both construction and use. The projected increase is on automatically adjusting temperature, ventilation and lighting in accordance
the scale of 200 billion square metres by 2050. with how a building is used. On the basic level this could be as simple as
movement sensors, but newer network-connected sensors and artificial
The most common way of measuring energy use in buildings is kilowatt hours intelligence systems can “learn” the use patterns of a building and anticipate
per square metre (kWh/sqm). But the total energy use of construction (divided change in advance. In this way, a building can be divided up into zones which
by the expected lifetime of the building) should be added to the measurement.
Moreover, kWh/sqm does not account for the benefit given by the building.
Therefore, it should be complemented with a measurement of energy use Optimising space utilisation
divided by intensity of use, e.g. energy use per resident or energy use per Innovation companies Flowscape and
client, depending on the purpose of the building. Yanzi use digital technology to optimise
office space use, while increasing the
quality of workplaces.
The main ways of reducing energy demand and greenhouse gas emissions
for buildings are a reduction in demand for building space, a reduction of Space management solutions
can reduce the need to construct
energy use during operation, roll-out of low-carbon heating and cooling, new buildings.
retrofitting to minimise energy use and carbon footprint and a reduction of
energy use and carbon footprint during construction and refurbishment.
Reduced demand for building space Retrofitting the Empire

Some sectors have dramatically reduced their need for building space in State Building
recent years – most notably banks and post offices, where so many of the
activities that used to be performed there have moved online. Other possible A recent retrofit of New York’s Empire
State Building included new windows
future candidates for a change in that same direction would be education (with and smart lighting systems throughout
increasing opportunities for online education) and retail stores of different the building.
kinds as internet shopping changes the conditions for those businesses.
The retrofit cut energy use by 40%.
lowering construction emissions has rarely been prioritised and so is to a

Smart thermostats large extent unexplored.
Smart thermostats, like those made by The reuse of old building structures is the best first option to avoid emissions.
Nest, automatically adjust to people’s But when this isn’t possible and entirely new buildings must be constructed,
habits, saving energy on heating and low-carbon materials and products should be chosen. In addition, it is
cooling in residential homes.
important to optimise through material, space and energy-efficient designs,
They could contribute to 2.6 Gt as well as taking advantage of low-carbon transport, and materials used in
of emissions cuts up to 2050. large volumes ought to be locally sourced.
Shared knowledge and the development of digital tools for the whole
are only lit, heated, cooled and ventilated when they’re used – thus reducing construction process, combined with stricter demands in procurement,
energy consumption and cost while improving comfort. will allow emissions from construction and refurbishment to be strongly
reduced. Emissions from construction, most notably from concrete, cement
What’s more, such a system could interface with a smart grid – knowing to and steel, are described in greater detail in the “Industry” chapter of
heat a building, for example, when energy supply is high but demand is low. this report.4
This would allow building stock to balance out supply variations in an energy
system with a high percentage of renewables.
Low-carbon heating and cooling

The temperature regulation systems in buildings contribute a substantial portion
of greenhouse gas emissions. This can be reduced substantially through
Wooden buildings
investments in low-carbon technologies such as heat pumps, solar cells, heat
Mjøsa Tower, the world’s tallest
storage technology and district heating systems based on renewable resources. wooden building, proves that tall
Rapid investment in renewable energy production and storage on a building and structures can be built using wood.
block level offers a key opportunity to scale renewables exponentially.
Using timber for buildings can
reduce emissions from material
Doubled retrofitting production by up to 85%.
Among the world’s existing buildings, doubling the pace of retrofitting holds
great potential for reducing emissions – LED lighting, improved insulation,
energy-efficient ventilation and smart windows will have the most impact.
It is also important to consider that emissions related to the production Heat pumps
of new insulation, ventilation and windows must be minimised, otherwise
Danfoss’s heat pumps use energy
planned emissions savings can be lost.3
in a building’s environment to heat
and cool with a low carbon footprint.
Low-carbon construction
Heat pumps reduce energy use
The emissions from the production of materials such as cement, concrete and by 50 –75% .
steel, as well as the construction process itself, are substantial and therefore
need to be specifically addressed. To date, the potential of
Cities, in partnership with regulators, can Halving emissions by 2030 within the buildings Technologies such as big data, artificial
implement strong requirements to halve carbon sector will require a collection of related, intelligence and the internet of things – if applied
footprints in existing building stock. They can targeted policy initiatives. Introducing a four- successfully and at scale – have an opportunity
require that new buildings are constructed with step principle2 for buildings is one such initiative. to deliver large improvements in space utilisation
the lowest possible footprint and by companies First, one should try to reduce the total need for and reduce building energy use. This goes
that are aligned with the 1.5°C target, and that building space, then improve the way space is hand-in-hand with new business models which
new/refurbished buildings include photovoltaics used, then reconstruct a building to better adapt increase the utilisation factor of shared space,
and/or energy storage capabilities by default. it to new needs, and only as a fourth and last and improve their comfort at the same time.
resort construct a new building.
Also, there is a real opportunity for companies Other technology opportunities include the
within the building sector to show climate Successful strategies here will both reduce the balancing of energy demand with local energy
leadership by setting bold decarbonisation total amount of building space, thus reducing production and storage, which will become useful
targets and push reductions in demand for operational energy consumption, and reduce as more new buildings include the installation
building space. Not only would this reduce the need for new construction and thus energy of small-scale renewable energy systems,
emissions, but it would make these low-carbon and emissions in that phase. Technology can and the tracking of a building’s life cycle from
buildings attractive from an economic viewpoint. support more efficient use of offices, shops and construction to usage to repurposing. Both of
Some companies are already doing this: the educational buildings, but economic incentives these possibilities will drive further efficiencies in
Global Real Estate Sustainability Benchmark can speed this up. terms of cost, energy use, materials, time and –
recognises building owners internationally with of course – emissions.
high sustainability performance. Emissions standards for new buildings and
retrofitting existing ones must be sharpened Finally, technology permits better materials
Homeowners and landlords can also play a role in from a life cycle perspective. The high initial management, the sharing of materials during
driving down emissions. Energy costs are a large costs of energy-efficient solutions can be offset construction, and the re-use of materials from
part of household bills, so many energy-efficient by their lower lifetime costs, but this will require retrofitted buildings, all of which dramatically
technologies are available that cost more at the investment support. Finally, policy can help direct cut the carbon costs of construction.
time of installation, but less over their lifespan. technology development towards emissions-
By taking rapid, decisive action to decarbonise cutting technologies in the building sector.
their homes, owners can both save money
and exhibit climate leadership.
ROA D M A P 2 0 1 9 – 2 0 3 0
2019–2025 2025–2030 2030+
Leading cities put strong requirements on construction companies Reduction in demand for new buildings in some Buildings with zero-
and processes to halve their emissions. countries, despite growing population, through carbon footprint
more efficient use of building space. become mainstream.
Business and house owners request climate-friendly buildings to show
leadership
Climate
climate leadership. Industry movement to implement carbon-free

materials and construction methods.
Leading construction companies take the lead in low-carbon construction
and materials. Companies generally require rental contracts
with zero-carbon emissions.
Private home owners and property managers take the lead in implementing
low-carbon solutions in combination with automated management.
Policies implemented to drive retrofitting of buildings. Policies implemented to support efficient space Zero emissions
use and punish inefficient use of space. construction
Investment support for low-carbon refurbishment and solar energy for new
and usage for
or renovated buildings.
Policy
new buildings.
Building standards set life cycle demands on new construction and
refurbishment, and require transparent carbon footprint information.
Digitalisation, artificial intelligence and the internet of things enable strong Full-scale implementation of building automation Most commercial
energy and space efficiency gains in existing and new buildings. for reduced energy use. and multifamily
Exponential
residential buildings
technology
New sharing models enable efficient space use, matching demand and supply. New low-carbon construction materials become
produce their
successfully scaled globally.
Solar and energy storage takes off in new and renovated buildings. own energy.
New low-carbon construction materials developed

For countries, cities and companies, strong policies and programmes

to halve carbon emissions in existing building stock are necessary.
These solutions must scale globally to have a real impact.
New global procurement practices for construction and renovation must

be developed. These should require dramatically improved energy and
carbon emission standards, as well as energy production and storage.
A critical mass of companies in the construction and facilities management

industries must become true climate leaders, driving the halving of
emissions through value chains and setting an example for others to follow.
New low-carbon business models for sharing Businesses must be open to

space and smart buildings must scale globally new economic models that take
to achieve economies of scale. advantage of the sharing of space.
Strong global funding must be allocated Finally, solutions in this sector must become
for sustainable retrofitting and construction, standardised and scalable around the world – rather
perhaps through the use of green bonds. than dispersed and fragmented – to achieve results.
TRANSPORT

With ambitious coordinated measures, it is possible for

this sector to halve emissions by 2030
Yes, these solutions are available and economically viable

with strong partnerships between industry, public sector
and academia.
Strong policy packages are a requirement. Lock-in of existing

vehicle stock. Aviation remains problematic in the short-to-
medium term, mass transit systems are expensive, capital costs
are high and it may be difficult to change behaviour. Measures
to optimise transport as a system are currently inadequate.

OR ELIMINATED?
Carbon pricing and strict emissions standards can lower

demand for high-emissions transportation, while technology
and business models can make sustainable solutions cheaper
and more attractive. Policies to ban emitting light duty vehicles,
as a first step for new vehicles, can also help to close the gap
between existing and zero-emitting vehicles.
BUILDINGS TRANSPORT
Transport-related emissions total 8.6 Gt CO2e per year, which represents
16% of the global total. Most (73%) of these emissions come from short
journeys, mainly in and around cities, in cars, motorbikes, buses and trucks.
9.9 technologies exist that can entirely replace these with
Economically-viable 8.6
new services for accessibility and mobility, clean mass transit systems and
zero-emissions vehicles.1 However, an appropriate incentive structure for their
swift
75%implementation is missing. 75% 75%
The rest (27%) of the total is accounted for by long-haul transport, which
Annual emissions
Annual emissions
Annual emissions
includes shipping, aviation and heavy vehicles. While solutions exist to halve
fossil-fuel use in these sectors by 2030, doing so will require significant
50%
policy Reduced
initiatives. demand
Eliminating for is technically difficult.
them completely 50% Mobility and accessibiity 50%
8.6 building space 4.6 Mass transit and cycling 4.2
Reduced energy use during operation Electric vehicles
25% Low-carbon heating and cooling 25% Efficient shipping 25%
Double retrofitting Low-emission heavy vehicles
Low−carbon construction Remote working and meetings
2030 2020 2025 2030 2020 2025 2030

Year Year
Figure 12. Transport

Estimated 51% reduction of the annual emissions of the transport sector by 2030,
which includes reduction of 0.08 Gt (2%) electricity and heat-related emissions.
FOOD NATURE-BASED
S O LU T I O N S F O R Mobility and accessibility

Individual ownership of transportation is far from the most efficient way to
F I R S T H A LV I N G distribute resources. The average car is parked 95% of the time.3 A lower-
emissions alternative is to replace car trips with clean “mobility-as-a-service”
The way we travel has an enormous impact on the world around us. Without offerings, provided through fleets of shared zero-emissions vehicles. Such
strong efficiency measures and major changes in the way we transport goods a car fleet could be just 3% of the size of today’s fleet of individually owned
and people around the world, humankind is on course for a difficult future. vehicles. Although each car would be travelling a far greater distance than
it does currently, total travel distance across all vehicles would fall by a third
But it is certainly possible to halve global emissions from transport by – even during peak hours.4 Longer distances per car means that life cycles
2030, and change has already begun. By adopting an ”Avoid-Shift-Improve” would be shorter, allowing for faster adoption of newer, cleaner technologies
approach to policy measures, we can significantly reduce the environmental and more rapid CO2 reductions.
impact of transport. This means avoiding inefficient or unnecessary travel
with improved urban planning, management of transport demand, and digital However, it is worth noting that cities where mobility-as-a-service solutions
communication technology; shifting to more efficient or environmentally- like Uber are growing are seeing a simultaneous fall in public transport use.
friendly modes of transportation and/or to off-peak travel, and improving Without these services recommending mass transit where appropriate, and
the energy efficiency and carbon intensity of vehicles through technological, using 100% zero-emissions vehicles where not, the potential for emissions
operational, regulatory or pricing strategies.2 cuts will be limited. More effective would be a single interface for all mobility
solutions in the area, combining public transport, car-sharing, ride-sharing,
Transport is more than cars, of course. Mass transit, walking and cycling, bike-sharing, micro-mobility, rental cars and more. Many of the providers of
micromobility and accelerating the introduction of a sharing economy will “micromobility” systems are now widening their services by adding multiple
be major contributors to rapidly reducing emissions. The current growth types of e-mobility.5,6 These solutions are developing fast – in some cases so
in accessibility, mobility (such as car- and ride-sharing) and micromobility fast that the legacy systems are struggling with adaptation and integration.
(such as electric scooters and cycle hire) services is promising. The growth
of electric vehicles, which beat traditional vehicles on performance and Mass transit and cycling
are better for the health of cities, is likely to accelerate at a time when they Mass transit – buses, trains and light rail, complemented by cycling and walking –
are increasingly competitive in terms of purchasing price. The total cost of is generally the lowest-emissions solution for large numbers of people.
ownership is already better for electric cars in some countries and contexts. Compared to private vehicles, mass transit saves energy, reduces greenhouse
However, the limited resources for battery production, hydrogen and biofuels gas emissions, improves health and lowers pollution.7 However, mass transit is
may limit growth of zero-emissions vehicles. Development of infrastructure,
such as charging stations and hydrogen fuelling stations is also required.
Intelligent electric
Aviation, shipping and heavy vehicles are more complex. This chapter will
bike trailers
address all major forms of transport, proposing real solutions to halve
Nüwiel’s electric bicycle trailer
emissions by 2030. It will focus on mature technologies, not those – like automatically follows the movement
Hyperloop – which are untested and still in a very early stage of development. of the bicycle so that the cyclist does
not have to pull it.
Transporting small cargo by bike
rather than car can avoid 64 Mt CO2e
of emissions annually by 2030.
being challenged by cheap private ride-hailing services, which risk an increase market saturation would reach 50% by 2024 and would reach close to 100%
in congestion. in 2026 . This exponential transition to electric vehicles can be accelerated by
cities and countries announcing bans on emitting light duty vehicles**.
Traditional and electric bikes are among the most low-emissions modes
of transport, manual or motorised, that exist today – and come with hefty
co-benefits in terms of health and reduced traffic congestion. If the share of
cycling in all annual urban trips worldwide rises from 7% to 23%, then by 2050 Sharing fitness app data
the sector could avoid cumulative emissions of 2.1 Gt CO2. Meanwhile, it could
cumulatively save cities around the world 25 trillion US$.8 The Strava fitness app shares
anonymised local data with city
officials, offering crucial insights
Digital solutions can nudge and support the transition from infrastructure into cyclist and runner behaviour.
dominated by cars to those based on varied modes of transport. If 5% of
the annual trips currently made by car move to foot travel, about 3 Gt of Users upload more than 15.3 million
activities every week.
cumulative CO2 emissions can be avoided.
Electric vehicles
In 2018, the global electric car fleet exceeded 5.1 million, an increase of two
million from the previous year. Electric cars are still a very minor fraction (<1%)
of all cars in circulation,9 though a dedicated policy package (see box in Policy
chapter) means that Norway is an outlier with around every second new car sold Bans on emitting light duty vehicles
being electric in 2018.10 If the global sales of EVs follow Norway’s trajectory and
Between 2017 and 2019, eleven economies announced bans on new
grow by 33% each year, 50% market saturation will be reached by 2028 and
fossil-fuelled vehicle sales, or the intention to introduce future bans,
close to 100% will be reached by 2031. If the global rate of EV sales increase in
including France, UK, China, India, the Netherlands and Ireland.11
2018 (64%) instead would be repeated each year over the coming decade, then
27 cities have signed the Fossil Fuel Free Streets Declaration,
committing to ban emitting light duty vehicles by 2030.12
Renting electric vehicles Since September 2017, more than 35 major firms have pledged to
EkoRent is a 100% electric car rental make their vehicle fleets 100% electric by joining EV100.13
and sharing service, and therefore
zero-emissions when the electricity In December 2018 the Driving Change Together Electromobility
comes from renewable sources.
Declaration was launched, and has already been joined by 38 countries,
With a 30% market share, about international organisations representing over 1,500 cities and regions,
11 Mt of emissions would be
avoided annually. and 1,200 individual companies.14
*Assuming car sales will stabilise and stay flat after 2020. Data source: carsalesbase.com for total cars sold by year and ev-volumes.com for electric vehicle sales.
**An “emitting vehicle” emits more than 50g/km and is thereby not a ZLEV. A ZLEV (Zero- and Low-Emission Vehicle) is defined in the European Regulation as a
passenger car or a van with CO2 emissions between 0 and 50 g/km. For heavier vehicles these levels will be different.
Less business travel

Electric scooters and motorcycles are uncommon compared to those
powered by fossil-fuels. However, electric versions of all these vehicles are on Telia has implemented measures
a strong exponential trajectory fuelled by increasing consumer demand based to reduce business travel in favour
on cost, performance and high desirability. of more video conferencing and
online meetings.
A key factor in the transition to electric vehicles is where the electricity comes Air travel at Telia has fallen
from. To deliver the greatest emissions cuts, it can only come from 100% by almost 69%.
renewable sources, and the supply chain should also be considered – as

mineral sourcing and battery production can involve substantial emissions.
Nonetheless, a shift to 100% of light vehicle sales to electric vehicles by 2030

is one of the biggest opportunities to dramatically reduce emissions in the Reducing demand for air travel
transport sector. Furthermore, smart charging or vehicle-to-grid technologies Lighter materials and more efficient propulsion systems mean emissions
can improve the utilisation of the power grid and enable higher renewable from modern planes are less intensive than previous generations, but the
energy integration. growth in the sector is dwarfing all improvements – and aircraft emissions
high in the atmosphere have a disproportionately large impact on the climate.
The combined effect of electrification, sharing and autonomous vehicles As such, emissions cuts in aviation are more difficult than in other parts of
will be an immense reduction of travel costs. This may generate increased the transport sector.
transport volumes and demand for new business models in infrastructure
provision and public transport.15 It will be necessary for policymakers to steer Part of the solution is to reduce demand. Rail, shipping and road transport
these developments to create a transportation system that society wants and typically emit at least six times less greenhouse gas emissions than any
that can ensure affordable low-carbon mobility to citizens.16 aviation option for each tonne transported.17 Adopting the least-carbon
intensive of these transport modes in a given region or circumstance will
Remote working dent emissions – this is an opportunity for digitally enhanced optimisation.
The nature of working life is changing rapidly. Employees are demanding more High-speed rail and long-haul road are already competitive with aviation
flexibility to successfully balance family and work commitments, as well as where routes exist, and these can be fully electrified. Where routes do not
to reduce long commutes. In response, businesses are developing policies exist, however, construction will come with significant emissions.
and structures in order to meet these demands and become, or remain, an
attractive employer. Co-working hubs are becoming more common, but A rising anti-flight movement has been spearheaded by climate activist
unfortunately they are often located in city centres, rather than in suburbs Greta Thunberg and the “Stay on the Ground” campaign in Sweden, urging
close to where people live. Such practices could reduce individual commuting people to take a flight-free year. This, and a recently-introduced flight tax, may
emissions by around 50–60% annually and at the same time reduce pressure already have had some impact. In the first quarter of 2019 Swedish airports
on infrastructure. High-quality telepresence also has the potential to replace saw a 4.5% decline in passenger numbers compared to the first quarter of
many business trips, saving cost, time and carbon emissions. 2018,18 and demand for international train travel is growing simultaneously.
The campaign has spread to e.g. Great Britain, Denmark, Belgium, France,
Germany, Canada, Norway, Slovenia and Austria.
Efficient shipping
If the shipping industry were a country, its greenhouse gas emissions would be
the sixth largest emitter. Unfortunately, emissions from international shipping
are not regulated under the Paris Agreement. In 2018 nations agreed through
the IMO to at least halve emissions from shipping by 2050 and some major
sector companies are already aiming to reach zero emissions by this date.
This is a good first start, but more needs to happen and faster. Zero-emissions
shipping is feasible, but may not be commercially competitive until at least
2030 without policy intervention. In the meantime, the industry must switch
to lower carbon fuels, reduce speeds, optimise routes with digital technology,
retrofit efficiency upgrades, and employ greater energy storage capabilities.
Halving emissions from shipping is technically feasible and economically
viable. However, to achieve this by 2030 the right policy incentives, coupled
with collaboration across the maritime industry, governments, academia,
international organisations, NGOs and others is required to join the dots,
align and act together.
Low-emission trucks Delivering flowers by sea

Commercial road transport can be fossil-free by 2050,19 but it will be
The GreenCHAINge value chain
necessary to transition the industry to low-carbon modes of operation to
consortium transports cut flowers
halve emissions by 2030. Improved routing and better load management can by air-conditioned containers at sea
cut annual emissions by 20%, while new fuel and power-train technologies rather than by air.
can provide additional reductions. Biofuels are seen as a promising first step, Delivering roses by boat rather than
but ultimately this part of the transport sector must also electrify. Long-haul plane cuts CO2 emissions by 87%.
electric trucks running on electric roads or equipped with large batteries
could reach cost parity with diesel engines in about 10 years.
Reducing truck emissions
Scania’s Transport Lab is reducing

truck emissions through driver
behaviour, smart maintenance,
aerodynamics and alternative fuels.
Scania halved CO2 per tonne-

kilometre between 2008 and 2012.
ACCELERATORS
Rapid shifts in manufacturer portfolios towards Enabling policy packages and frameworks Technology and transport have a lot in common.
zero-emissions vehicles will drive up market share to effectively employ “Avoid-Shift-Improve” Both are seen as fundamental to meeting the
much faster than industry predictions, assuming approach including longer term full needs of people in their personal and economic
demand continues to increase exponentially. decarbonisation roadmaps to also improve the lives. In the transport sector, digital technology
More companies are announcing a phaseout harder to abate transport sectors. A large range can help decrease demand and shift it to more
of fossil-fuelled vehicles and the ramping up of of digital solutions to mobility are available to efficient modes of travel, such as walking, cycling
zero-emissions vehicles. Corporations that rely on assist mature zero-emitting vehicles in avoiding and public transport. It can also be used to
transport services must set ambitious targets for and shifting demand to achieve the first halving optimise the use of existing infrastructure
their emissions and hit them by increasing their use of emissions from the sector by 2030. and vehicles.
of battery and plug-in electric vehicles even further.
Many cities and countries have announced In the coming years, however, we must move
Transport is a real opportunity for individuals to policies to ban sales of emitting light duty away from a vision of mobility based on
step up as climate leaders, reducing the amount vehicles, but more must do so. This one step will individual motorised transport, towards access
they travel and choosing low-carbon modes of drive major changes in the transport industry, to transport, prioritising people and their quality
transportation over those associated with high and must be ambitious. Major manufacturers of life, with strong attention to safety and social
emissions. Already, young people are displaying are ready, and it is technically and economically equity. This will increase resource efficiency and
less interest in car ownership than previous feasible to set a start date of 2025 or 2030. reduce costs.
generations, but this is balanced out by rapidly
increasing demand for air travel. Investment in mass transit systems is essential Real transformational change in the transport
to encourage a transition away from individual sector will require annual investments of around
Reducing air travel might seem like a backwards vehicles. Policies to encourage new mobility US$2 trillion. That sounds like a lot, but business
step in a globalising world, but there is room for solutions and systems will also be crucial to as usual has a much higher cost and investments
a substantial cutback while still retaining some accelerate this shift. will lead to fuel savings and lower operational
travel. Unnecessary journeys can be minimised costs, decreased congestion and reduced air
without anyone missing them, and many goods Key policy measures will also include reducing pollution. These and other benefits of sustainable
can be transported by sea or rail. the barriers for new technologies and business transport can deliver savings of up to US$70
models that can replace their fossil-intensive trillion by 2050.20
equivalents. One example is subsidising the
introduction of electric cars, making the
technology cost-comparative at an earlier stage.
ROA D M A P 2 0 1 9 – 2 0 3 0
2019–2025 2025–2030 2030+
All major car companies have announced dates for when 100% of Fossil-fuel use in aviation begins to decline as Zero-emissions
their sales will be zero-emissions vehicles. alternative fuels are used. transportation is
the preferred and
Strong climate movements among individuals, cities and companies Renewable energy increases in the shipping
default choice for
tip the market towards zero-emissions vehicles and mass transit. sector.
businesses and
leadership
Climate
Cycling in cities continues rapid growth. Zero-emissions technology economically viable individuals.
in some heavy commercial vehicle markets
A sway in public opinion towards zero emission, autonomous and
shared vehicles. Strong climate movements result in a shift
away from high-emission transportation
companies and the growth of next-generation
zero-emissions transport companies.
All major markets have announced intentions to ban emitting Bans come into force for emitting light duty First major
light duty vehicles. vehicles, accelerating a transition to zero-carbon economies
transportation. announce incoming
Policy
Major infrastructure investment in cycle routes and mass transit in cities.

bans on emitting
Stronger policies on aviation and shipping
Barriers to technological shift are reduced with policy incentives for aviation and
introduced as technologies reach maturity.
early-stage innovation. shipping.
Light zero-emissions vehicles expand market share exponentially and Zero emissions vehicles dominate new light Zero-emissions
zero-emissions heavy vehicles begin to reach the market. vehicle sales globally and investment in fossil- aircraft begin short
fuelled vehicles is phased out. haul routes.
Digital tools integrate transportation options for commuters and travellers
reducing time and adding value. Business models are developed for shared, Zero-emissions ships
licenced autonomous zero-emissions vehicles. reach the market.
Exponential
technology
Next-generation telepresence enables rapid growth of travel-free meetings.

Zero-emissions
vehicles dominate
new sales in heavy
transport globally
and investment
in fossil-fuelled
heavy vehicles is
phased out.
The highest emissions sources must be addressed first. Road-based transport

represents 70% of the emissions. Bans on selling new emitting light duty
vehicles must be introduced as soon as possible.
Corporations and investors should set science-based Targets must be set to replace mobility
targets and roadmaps for full decarbonisation of with accessibility, to avoid a projected
transport emissions in their portfolios. increase in demand for transportation.
Incentivise a sharing economy and shift Minimise air travel

from vehicle ownership to usage. and goods transport.
Introduce a meaningful price on carbon and stricter

emission standards for aviation and shipping emissions.
Invest in R&D and acceleration of early stage high-impact solutions

for avoiding emissions from aviation, shipping and long-haul travel.
FOOD CONSUMPTION
DO SOLUTIONS EXIST TO HALVE

EMISSIONS GLOBALLY?
Solutions exist but given local and regional realities and the
need to feed a growing population, halving current emissions
from food consumption by 2030 seems not possible.
A shift to plant-based diets in mainly Western industrialised

countries and preventing a nutrition transition to Western diets
in developing countries can happen quite rapidly. However,
given expected population growth and dietary needs in many
countries, halving food consumption emissions globally does
not seem feasible.
Cultural and societal norms about food, lack of healthy food

alternatives, promotion of animal source foods, and a strong
resistance from the meat and dairy lobby could slow progress.

OR ELIMINATED?
A global movement towards healthy and sustainable diets,

policies that include economic incentives and regulatory
measures and behavioural change and education can help
rapidly scale healthy plant-based diets.
TRANSPORT
Global food production is the single largest human pressure on Earth,
FOOD CONSUMPTION
threatening local ecosystems, driving a sixth mass extinction of species,
and impacting the stability of the entire Earth system.1,2,3 Feeding and
producing food for our current population of 7.6 billion people accounts for
approximately 8.6 12.5 Gt CO2e or 23% of annual GHG emissions, of which 5.6 Gt 5.6
CO2e (mainly from livestock production and rotting food waste) are directly 5.3
related to the food choices that we make.1 Although global food production
of calories has kept pace with population growth, nearly 820 million people
75%
still lack sufficient food and many more consume an unhealthy diet that
75% 75%
contributes to premature death and morbidity.4,5
Annual emissions
Annual emissions
Annual emissions
Meanwhile, rising incomes and urbanisation are driving a global dietary
50% Mobility
transition in which and
traditional accessibiity
diets are being replaced by diets higher in
50% 50%
animal source foods.6 If this trend is not broken and reversed, emissions4.2 from
4.6 Mass
food consumption andtransit
production and cycling
will nearly double by 2050.2 Livestock
Electric vehicles
production is responsible for around 66% of food’s annual emissions yet
provides only 18% of calories.1,7 In addition, overconsumption of red and
processed
25% meat, Efficient
unsaturatedshipping
fats and dairy products are linked to increased 25% 25%
risk for certain types of preventable diseases (e.g. cancers and heart
Low-emission
disease).2 Given heavyofvehicles
this, a significant reduction animal source foods and
Healthy plant-based diet
Remote working and meetings
increase in healthy plant-based foods in our diets will both reduce global Reduced food loss and waste
food-related greenhouse gas emissions and improve health.8
2030 2020 2025 2030 2020 2025 2030

Year Year
Figure 13. Food Consumption

If current trends are followed, greenhouse gas emissions from food consumption will increase from 5.6 to 6.8 Gt CO2e by 2030 and nearly double to 9.8 Gt CO2e by 2050. We can prevent
this increase in emissions and reduce current food-related emissions to near the planetary boundary for food (5 Gt CO2e) 2 with a 40% global shift to healthy plant-based diets by 2030
(75% by 2050) and reducing food loss and waste by 25% by 2030 (50% by 2050). Reduced food loss and waste also avoids emissions from food production and land conversion, which are
addressed in the next chapter.
FOOD NATURE-BASED
S O LU T I O N S F O R F I R ST Either way, global net emissions from food consumption must decrease
and shifting to healthy plant-based diets is the most important solution for
H A LV I N G BY 2 0 3 0 accomplishing this.1,2 This chapter will focus on the demand side of the food
system (e.g. consumers, supermarkets and restaurants). Information about
food production emissions can be found in the “Nature-based solutions”
In the 2018 version of this report, we outlined a pathway to halve chapter that immediately follows.
current emissions in the food consumption sector. In 2019, the EAT-Lancet
Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems assessed
scenarios for feeding a growing population a healthy diet within planetary
boundaries and concluded that some emissions from the food sector
may be unavoidable with current technologies, local and regional realities,
and population growth trajectories. Here, we have adjusted our
conclusions accordingly.
The objective should be to prevent emissions from rising further and

slightly reduce emissions from 5.6 to 5.3 Gt CO2e by 2030 and within 5.0
Gt CO2e by 2050. Emissions could be lowered below 5.0 Gt CO2e if an even
greater percentage of the global population shifted to healthy plant-based
diets or cut animal source foods completely from their diets and adopted
either vegetarian or vegan diets. For this report, however, we have adopted
the ambitious goal of a 40% global shift to the Planetary Health Diet (see
definition in box below) by 2030 and a 75% shift by 2050.
The shift to a healthy plant-based diet, however, will be unequally distributed.

Countries that currently have higher consumption of animal source foods
(mainly Western industrialised countries) will need deeper transformations.
The biggest impacts on reducing emissions in these countries will come from
a transition towards healthy plant-based diets and reduction in food loss and
waste. Luckily, both of these actions are now moving from the far periphery
of climate policy and towards the centre of debates on climate and health.
Countries with low food-related emissions, on the other hand, often face
large burdens of malnutrition or have large agro-pastoral communities that
rely on protein from livestock. Given these considerations, the role of animal
source foods in people’s diets must be carefully considered within local and
regional realities.
Planetary Health Diet

The EAT-Lancet Commission outlined targets by food groups for a
healthy diet that optimises human health.2 Healthy diets have an optimal
calorific intake and consist largely of a diversity of plant-based foods,
low amounts of animal source foods, contain unsaturated rather than
saturated fats, and limited amounts of refined grains, highly processed
foods and added sugars. With the Planetary Health Diet, up to four
servings of animal source foods can be consumed per week and it is
most closely associated with a flexitarian diet. The diet can be adapted
to local and regional food cultures. In this report, we have used the
scientific targets outlined in the Planetary Health Diet for the analysis.
Healthy and sustainable diets

Shifting away from current global food trends may seem like an impossible
task, but major dietary changes are a surprisingly common occurrence.
Over the last half century, many high-income countries have undergone
a nutrition transition from plant-based diets to what is known as the Western
diet – rich in animal source foods, refined grains, saturated fats and sugar,
and low in healthy plant-based foods.9,10
To cut emissions in the food sector and improve health, we must swing the
pendulum back in the other direction – reversing the shift towards diets high Supermarkets
in animal source foods in higher-income countries and slowing or stopping
its progression in lower-income countries while improving access to and Swedish supermarket ICA has
affordability of nutritious foods for all, especially the most vulnerable.10,11 committed to help reduce household
food-related CO2 emissions.
A shift of 40% of the global population to healthy and sustainable diets
by 2030 and 75% by 2050 can keep total food-related greenhouse emissions ICA has also pledged to reduce its
in line with a +1.5°C world. Now is a critical moment to avoid a nutrition emissions by 55,000 tonnes of CO2
annually from 2020.
transition in developing countries.
There are some early signs a transition on this scale is possible. Around 60%
of Americans report they are cutting back on meat-based products and of
these 77% hope this to be a permanent shift in diet.12 A recent report found Better burgers
that US beef consumption fell by 19% between 2005 and 2014.13 In the UK, for the climate
a recent survey shows that over a quarter (28%) of meat eaters have reduced
The emissions from all food sold
meat consumption and a further one in seven (14%) adults aim to do so in the
in Swedish hamburger chain Max
future.14 Meanwhile, Sweden may have reached “peak meat” with consumption are now offset.
falling rapidly.15 But to reach such ambitious targets, these trends should
By 2022, the company aims for every
accelerate and scale globally. second meal sold to be plant-based.
Growth in healthy Halving meat consumption

plant-based diets in China
China has set a target of halving
Interest in vegan and vegetarian recipes meat consumption by 50% by 2030.
has risen significantly on the popular This could reduce global agricultural
German recipe website, chefkoch.de. emissions by 12%.
Vegan recipe popularity rose from 1.2% China currently consumes 28%
to 13.5% between 2005 and 2018. of the world’s meat.
Reduced food loss and waste other hand, relatively little food on the consumer end is wasted in low-income
countries but more loss occurs during production.2
About one third of the 1.3 billion tonnes of food produced each year is lost
or wasted.16 Loss refers to food that spills, spoils or is bruised or wilted before
In addition to adopting a healthy plant-based diet, reducing food loss and
it reaches the consumer, while waste refers to food that is good quality
waste is an important strategy for cutting emissions associated with food
but is discarded rather than consumed. These inefficiencies are unevenly
consumption and production. These emissions come from methane released
distributed, with higher-income countries wasting almost as much food
from food waste decomposing in landfills and carbon dioxide from food
annually as the entire net food production of sub-Saharan Africa. On the
production and land conversation.
Reducing food loss and waste by 50% can be achieved through increased
Low-fossil burgers investment in collective storage facilities, food processing, technologies and
cold storage chains.17,18 Growers can also be encouraged to adopt strategies
Beyond Meat creates plant-based for reducing food loss and waste. In high-income countries, awareness
meat substitutes that are better for
animal welfare and the climate. campaigns can be used to educate consumers to plan their purchases
and meal preparations to reduce food waste. Policies that support drastic
Beyond Meat’s burgers generate reductions in food loss and waste should be incorporated into city- and
90% less greenhouse gas emissions
than a beef burger. national-level public policy.2
Rescuing food Canada’s dietary guidelines
Too Good to Go is an app that lets Canada’s 2019 dietary guidelines

people rescue unsold food from shops emphasize a shift toward plant-based
and restaurants. foods and drinking more water.
The company aims to save 100 million A global shift in similar diets could
meals from being wasted by end save up to 11 million lives and reduce
of 2020. global emissions up to 96% by 2050.
Outlawing food waste Expiration dates

in the EU WhyWaste simplifies expiration
In 2016, France outlawed food waste date management for food retailers,
from supermarkets. The policy is eliminating food waste and cutting
contagious: Italy and Germany have both costs and complaints.
since implemented similar bans. Using WhyWaste’s systems, food
Food waste is linked to 8% of global waste can be reduced by up to 40%.
greenhouse gas emissions.
Major businesses are already beginning to act There are few examples of policy interventions Several food technologies, like plant-based or
to reduce the environmental impact of food to reduce consumption of high-emissions and lab-grown meat, may have potential in reducing
consumption. Kellogg’s, PepsiCo, Bayer, DuPont, unhealthy foods,21 however there are examples emissions from food consumption, however
Danone, Mars, Nestlé, Unilever and more have of interventions to reduce sugar consumption – the health impacts of these foods needs to be
pledged to accelerate necessary changes in mostly in the form of taxes – which could prove investigated. A system-wide rethinking of the
global food systems and a new generation of instructive.22 In addition to taxation, policymakers grocery store and supermarket industry also
food companies and retail chains that focus on can encourage healthier and climate-friendly offers huge potential in the near term to reduce
healthy and sustainable food have entered the diets with clearer labelling on goods, certification waste and drive a rapid dietary transition to
market. In 2016, a coalition of 30 leaders from schemes and public health campaigns.2 healthy and sustainable diets.
business, governments and NGOs announced Requirements for supply-chain transparency,
an initiative to halve the amount of food wasted policies to outlaw food waste and research Since 2013 there has been strong growth in food
globally by 2030.19 into food system transformation can also play technology and it is now one of the four largest
a useful role. cleantech venture areas. Mobile applications,
Cities around the world are also working to such as Too Good to Go where consumers can
reduce the negative health and climate impacts A complementary approach involves encouraging connect directly with stores and restaurants to
of food consumption. This is being done new financing models within food systems, the purchase food that would have otherwise gone
through a wide range of measures that include creation of food tech hubs, and the development to waste, have the potential to rapidly reduce
overhauling public procurement, improving the of new businesses. This approach will also mean emissions from food loss and waste.
food environment around schools, regulating supporting the transformation of industries,
advertising and boosting local production of companies and individuals who lose out in the
healthy foods.20 transition to a more climate-friendly and healthy
food system.
Among consumers, the popularity of flexitarian,
vegetarian and vegan diets is growing along with
the increasing availability of animal source food
alternatives. With increasing awareness of the
role that food plays in climate change and human
health, a long-term and rapid shift is possible.
ROA D M A P 2 0 1 9 – 2 0 3 0
2019–2025 2025–2030 2030+
Global transition towards healthy diets underway in all nations. Broad global acceptance of healthy and Food system
sustainable diets. operating
Food companies have established emissions targets and climate strategies
within planetary
leadership
aligned with a +1.5°C world. Major economies halve meat-based emissions.

Climate
boundaries.
Supermarkets, restaurant chains and food companies promote healthy plant- Substantial reductions in food loss and waste.
Plant-based diets
based diets and develop policies to scale these products.
adopted by a
majority of people.
Removal of subsidies for unsustainable and unhealthy food production and Nutrition improves in developing countries in line Developing
consumption and new incentives for healthy and sustainable practices and with the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals countries reach
behaviour. (SDGs). SDG targets of
ending hunger and
Carbon pricing and supportive emission standards for the food system.
improving health.
Policy
National dietary guidelines promote healthy and sustainable eating and

Dramatic reduction
policies enacted to make healthy food affordable and accessible to everyone.
in number of people
Regulatory measures in place to drastically reduce food loss and waste. undernourished,
overweight and
obese.
A system-wide revolution in grocery stores and supermarkets. New technologies drive down food loss and Digitalisation of the
waste. food supply chain
Full digital transparency of the supply chain for food, from the producer to the
allows companies
consumer. Alternative proteins are now mainstream.
to easily target
Exponential
technology
Consumers’ goals to eat healthier and more sustainably are supported by remaining emissions
technology platforms and applications. and develop
strategies to deal
Innovation and exponential scaling of plant-based food products and with them.
alternative proteins.
Apps that help consumers to purchase leftover food at a reduced price
become commonplace.
Food is the dark horse in our fight against climate change. What we eat and how
much is lost and wasted is the final battleground in determining whether or not we
will achieve the Paris Agreement. An unprecedented opportunity exists, however, to
develop food as a common thread between policy frameworks aiming for improved
human health and environmental sustainability.
Past experience shows that large-scale systemic change is possible and three overarching
lessons from these transformations can guide the way forward in providing healthy and
sustainable diets to everyone on the planet. First, systems change requires collaboration
across sectors at all levels, working towards a shared set of ambitions. No single actor or
breakthrough will be able to achieve this by themselves.
Second, scientific evidence is key to guiding action.

While long-term research is important, rapid research is
also needed to help policymakers make quick decisions
with full information.
Third, the full spectrum of policy levers is necessary for transformation.

This includes both “soft” measures such as food labelling and consumer
information and “hard” approaches such as laws and fiscal measures;
soft measures alone will not get us there.2
NATURE-BASED
SOLUTIONS

EMISSIONS GLOBALLY?
Yes. A number of nature-based solutions can be implemented

today to halve emissions in the agriculture, forestry, and land-
use sector, and sequester carbon at very large scales.
Yes. But the scale of the transformation cannot be underestimated.

This may be the hardest sector to rapidly halve emissions.
Poor land-use planning, contradictory subsidies, focus on

quick profits, regulatory barriers, insufficient funding, lack of
knowledge, and vested interests could slow progress.

OR ELIMINATED?
Policymakers and corporations can scale new land-use

programmes regionally, with the help of technology and
investments. Innovative funding programmes are required
to scale them globally.
C U R R E N T S I T UAT I O N
Agriculture, forestry and land-use mainly associated with food production
are responsible for approximately 12.5 Gt CO2e or 23% of annual
Negative emissions
anthropogenic global emissions.1,2 These emissions include 5.6 Gt CO2e
mainly from livestock production and rotting food waste, and 6.9 Gt CO2e In the Paris Agreement nearly all scenarios investigated by the
from rice production, agriculture practices, fertiliser use, land conversion Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change require using “negative
and deforestation mainly for agriculture.1,2 emissions” to remove massive amounts of CO2 from the atmosphere
and store it on land, underground or in the oceans.5,7 Nature-based
Agriculture, forestry and land-use, however, have the potential to go from solutions can play a significant role in meeting the negative emissions
being a large part of the climate change problem to being one of the most required by the end of century in line with a +1.5°C world.
important solutions.3,4 This is possible because these natural systems are
both sources and very large sinks for carbon. With changes in how we
produce food and what we eat (see Food Consumption chapter) we can
both reduce greenhouse gas emissions and use forests, croplands, pastures
and peatlands to sequester carbon.1,4
To reach a 1.5°C world, we need to rapidly reduce global emissions and store
massive amounts of carbon in plant biomass and in the ground, going from
net positive to net negative emissions.5,6,7 This may be achieved without
relying upon untested technologies (such as Bioenergy with Carbon Capture
and Storage) through lifestyle changes such as a shift to healthy plant-
based diets.8 Forests, grasslands and wetlands are already storing incredible
amounts of carbon, but these sinks are currently being removed to grow food
and emitting huge amounts of greenhouse gases in the process.9 Halting the
destruction of these ecosystems and using nature to absorb and store carbon
from the atmosphere is a vital solution for reaching a 1.5°C world.1,3
T R A J E C TO R I E S
N ATNATURE
U R E -BASED
NATURE BA S E
BASED D SOURCES
SOURCES
SOURCES N ATNATURE
U R E - BASED
NATURE BA S ESINKS
BASED D SINKS
SINKS
6.9
6.9 0
0
5.3
5.3
75%
75%
storage potential
potential
Annual emissions
emissions
Reforestation
Reforestation
Forest protection
Forest protection Improved
Improved forest
forest management
management
Carbon storage
50%
50%
Avoided woodfuel
Avoided woodfuel harvest
harvest 3.4
3.4 Pasture
Pasture management
management -9.1
-9.1
Annual
Grazing management
Grazing management Biochar
Biochar
Carbon
25%
25% Fertiliser management
Fertiliser management Improved
Improved agriculture
agriculture practices
practices
Improved rice
Improved rice cultivation
cultivation Agroforestry
Agroforestry
Peatland protection
Peatland protection Peatland
Peatland restoration
restoration
2030
2030 2020
2020 2025
2025 2030
2030 2020
2020 2025
2025 2030
2030
Year
Year Year
Year
Figure 14. Figure 15.

Nature-based solutions can avoid 3.5 Gt CO2e emissions by 2030 from agriculture, Nature-based solutions from agriculture, forestry, and land-use can sequester
forestry, and land-use sectors, which are currently emitting 6.9 Gt CO2e. approximately 9.1 Gt CO2e per year by 2030.
FOOD NATURE-BASED
S O LU T I O N S F O R
350 million trees in one day
F I R S T H A LV I N G
Ethiopia has set a new world record by
planting over 350 million trees in a day.
Achieving the Paris Agreement will not only require a global shift towards
healthy diets, it also requires a radical shift in how we produce food and use land – An acre of mature trees absorbs as
much CO2 in a year as is produced
an agricultural, forestry and land-use revolution. Nature-based solutions can by a car driven 26,000 miles.
halve emissions from 6.9 to 3.4 Gt CO2e by 2030 and absorb and store up to
9.1 Gt of annual CO2e by 2030 and roughly 225 Gt by the end of the century.3,10
The solutions presented in this chapter are grouped into three categories –
forests, sustainable agriculture, and peatlands – with each solution labelled
as either a source (i.e. can reduce emissions) or sink (i.e. can increase storage). Reforestation in China
FO R EST S About 646,000 hectares of land has

been rehabilitated in the Kubuqi Desert.
Forest protection (source)
This restored land is capable of
Halting the destruction of the world’s remaining forests is the most important sequestering 15.4 million tonnes
action that can be taken to reduce emissions from agriculture, forestry, and of carbon.
land-use – accounting for approximately half of the emissions reductions
from the sector needed by 2030. Deforestation rates in the tropics had
begun to slow globally, however in 2018 rates increased again with 12
million hectares lost,11 the fourth-highest total since 2001. Average annual Avoided woodfuel harvest (source)
emissions in the past three years from deforestation have been 63% higher About three billion people cook on open fires. Fuel for these fires, often wood,
than in the preceding 14 years.12 Wildfires are another major source of forest accounts for over 2% of annual global emissions. Accelerating a transition
destruction, making up 5 to 10% of annual global CO2 emissions each year. away from burning wood for fuel has the potential for a cumulative reduction
Improved management of existing forests and wildfires has the potential for a of between 0.7 and 1.0 Gt CO2e with a best estimate of 0.9 Gt CO2e by 2030.3
cumulative reduction of between 7.0 and 10.2 Gt CO2e with a best estimate of This could be achieved by a global transition to cleaner cookstoves.13
8.8 CO2e by 2030.3
Reforestation (sink)
Reforestation is the single greatest solution for absorbing carbon from the
One trillion trees atmosphere. The majority of this potential (70%) lies in the tropics, particularly
The Trillion Tree Campaign connects
in grazing lands and degraded croplands3,14 Depending on how many hectares
funders with forest conservation are reforested, the cumulative sequestration potential is in the range of 6.0 to
ventures, to restore and protect one 43.0 Gt CO2e with a best estimate of 24.0 Gt CO2e by 2030.3
trillion trees by 2050.
A trillion trees planted could
potentially capture 25% of all
human-made CO2 emissions.
number of animals needed to supply the same amount of meat and dairy.
Drones planting trees These have the potential for a cumulative reduction of between 1.5 and 22.5
Gt CO2e with a best estimate of 2.1 Gt CO2e by 2030.3
Drones can sense crop health,
moisture and nutrients and even plant Pasture management (sink)
seeds. BioCarbon Engineering says its
drones can plant 100,000 trees a day. Managing pastures and rangelands by optimising grazing can increase
carbon sequestration in both biomass and soils. In addition, sowing legumes
Drones may reduce planting costs
by 85%. in planted pastures can increase the amount of carbon sequestered on
grazing lands, even when taking into account increased emissions associated
with planted legumes. Optimising grazing can cumulatively store between 0.4
and 1.6 Gt CO2e, with a best estimate of 0.4 Gt CO2e, while planting legumes
Improved forest management (sink)
in pastures can cumulatively store between 0.04 and 3.5 Gt CO2e, with a best
Reduced-impact logging, extended harvest rotations, and liana (woody estimate of 0.4 Gt CO2e by 2030.3
vine) cutting can improve forest management in timber production areas,
sequestering carbon in the process. When combined with extending harvest
Improved rice cultivation (source)
rotation in intensively managed production forests (i.e. plantations), improved
management of natural forests can cumulatively store between 2.1 and 19.0 Much of the world’s rice is typically grown in standing water, which can
Gt CO2e, with a best estimate of 3.5 Gt CO2e, while improved management on become depleted in oxygen and cause bacteria to break down plant matter
plantations can cumulatively store between 0.5 and 2.6 Gt CO2e, with a best to produce methane. Currently, rice emissions account for about 24% of
estimate of 1.1 Gt CO2e by 2030.3 agricultural methane emissions with 89% coming from Asia 1. Limiting the
amount of time rice paddies are underwater would cut emissions substantially,
save water, and not significantly reduce production. This has the potential for
S U STA I N A BL E AG RI C U LT URE an annual reduction of between 0.2 and 0.3 Gt CO2e, with a best estimate of
Fertiliser management (source) 0.27 Gt CO2e per year by 2030.3
Overuse and mismanagement of fertiliser and manure on croplands results
in approximately 2.0 Gt CO2e of emissions per year. Increasing efficiency
by applying the right amount at the right time to the right crops has
the potential for a cumulative reduction of between 1.0 and 2.4 Gt CO2e
with a best estimate of 1.7 Gt CO2e by 2030.3 As the world grapples with
feeding more people, it will be necessary to use fertiliser more efficiently
as well as redistribute its use from areas of over-application to areas
of under-application.4 Data-driven farming
Grazing management (source) Microsoft FarmBeats gives farmers

real-time data and actionable
Over-grazing on pastures and rangelands can release significant amounts of insights to increase production,
stored carbon in soils into the atmosphere.9 As such, decreasing the amount drive sustainability and lower costs.
of livestock in areas that are over-grazed and increasing it in areas that are Global food demand is projected
under-grazed can reduce emissions and improve production. Additionally, to double by 2050.
improved animal feed and the use of more efficient breeds could reduce the
PE AT L A ND S
Agroforestry
Peatland protection (source)
Agroforestry in Niger has resulted Globally, peatlands cover up to 440 million hectares, or about 3% of global
in the planting of 200 million trees, land area,15,16 and happen to be one of the most important carbon sinks on
improving the soil and storing carbon. the planet – storing an estimated 500–600 Gt CO2e17,18 Currently, however,
Agroforestry could store 2.5 Gt only about 1% of the world’s peatlands are protected. Draining peatlands
of carbon dioxide by 2030 and 52 Gt for agriculture releases carbon dioxide and creates fire risks. Increasing
by 2100. the area of protected peatlands from 3 million hectares to over 120 million
by 2030 has the potential for a cumulative reduction of between 0.4 and
2.7 Gt CO2e with a best estimate of 1.8 Gt CO2e by 2030.3
Biochar (sink)
Biochar is a charcoal-like substance, typically made from crop residue and Peatland restoration (sink)
other organic matter in a process called pyrolysis. It can simultaneously Peatlands are considered degraded when they’ve been drained or altered
improve soil quality while sequestering carbon and could stay in soils up to but have not been completely converted for other land uses. They can be
100 years. The amount of crop residue available for pyrolysis should permit restored, however, to prevent the further breakdown of stored plant material
the cumulative storage of approximately between 1.5 and 3.9 Gt CO2e, and to capture new plant debris and store carbon. The primary challenge to
with a best estimate of 2.6 Gt CO2e by 2030.3 peatland restoration is economic – the technical capacity to do this already
exists.14 Restoration of peatlands have the potential to store between 0.7
Improved agriculture practices (sink) and 2.5 Gt CO2e annually, with a best estimate of 0.8 Gt CO2e by 2030.3
There are a range of agricultural practices that can sequester carbon in
the soil. These range from crop rotation and leaving unused parts of the
crops on the fields to prevent soil erosion, to planting cover crops, to low- or
no-tilling systems. Combinations of these techniques are usually needed,
and the results are site-specific, but they can add up to substantial emissions
reductions with cumulative estimates ranging from between 0.7 and 1.2 Gt
CO2e, with a best estimate of 1.0 Gt CO2e by 2030.3
Agroforestry (sink)
In addition to techniques to sequester carbon in the soil, agroforestry, or
trees in croplands, is another solution for carbon storage.10 Some food crops Protecting peatland
are well-suited to growing alongside, beneath and above other species (e.g.
macadamia, black pepper, coffee, cacao). Trees used as windbreaks can help The Katingan Mentaya Project protects
reduce soil erosion, reduce evaporation, and increase yields, while storing vital peatland habitats in Central
carbon. As a result, adding scattered trees to croplands – particularly in rows Kalimantan, Indonesia.
with crops – can increase productivity and soil quality while reducing erosion. The project has prevented the
These solutions have the potential to cumulatively store between 1.2 and 4.7 release of greenhouse gases
equivalent to over 30 Mt CO2.
Gt CO2e, with a best estimate of 2.5 Gt CO2e by 2030.3
For governments and agriculture and forestry The economic incentives driving unsustainable The spread of the internet to all corners of the
businesses, there are many opportunities to agricultural practices and deforestation are globe provides a unique opportunity to equip
display leadership by establishing climate huge. Private investment has contributed farmers and those in the agriculture sector with
strategies and setting clear science-based US$414 billion to farming, forestry and fisheries the tools, information and education to transform
targets to decrease current emissions and rapidly operations in countries suffering from high the way they do business. Many of the solutions
increase negative emissions from agriculture, rates of deforestation in recent years. Since necessary to deliver a halving of emissions rely
forestry and land-use. Three important strategies 2010, out of US$167 billion given by developed on behavioural change – more efficient farming,
include committing to zero expansion of new countries and major donors for mitigation-related adopting new techniques and in some cases
agricultural land at the expense of natural development finance, just US$3.6 billion has reverting to old techniques. Technology firms
ecosystems, integrating 10% biodiversity gone to forestry. Meanwhile, the same countries need to focus heavily on reducing friction in
conservation into existing croplands and received US$87 billion in development finance these areas, making it easy for farmers to access
adopting a Half-Earth strategy (i.e. protecting for agriculture, the sector most responsible for information and act on that information.
half the Earth) for biodiversity conservation.4 tropical forest loss.20
.
The New York Declaration on Forests, launched in These policy contradictions need to be fixed,
2014, is a coalition that aims to end deforestation combining sustainable agriculture with forest
by 2030. The declaration’s 10 targets have the management to increase crop yields, reduce
potential to reduce annual emissions from 4.5 to emissions and drive growth. This is a win-win-win
8.8 Gt of CO2. The declaration has been endorsed situation for everyone. Consistency, however,
by more than 50 governments, more than 50 is a vital component of policy interventions in
of the world’s biggest companies, and more this sector. A stable, consistent approach on a
than 50 civil society and indigenous peoples’ timescale of decades is necessary for farmers
organisations.19 to make the long-term investments necessary
to halve emissions while increasing carbon
Large investors are also challenging sequestration.21
agribusinesses to change their game. In 2015,
Norway’s pension fund, the world’s largest
sovereign wealth fund, divested from 11
companies – including six palm oil companies –
due to their connections to deforestation.
ROA D M A P 2 0 1 9 – 2 0 3 0
2019–2025 2025–2030 2030+
Agro-businesses, farms and civil society develop a worldwide strategy Deforestation halted globally. Agriculture sector
for sustainable food systems to drive healthier, plant-based diets. globally on track to
Unprecedented global reforestation efforts
store more carbon
Governments and businesses commit to zero expansion of new agricultural underway to support mitigation efforts.
than it emits.
leadership
land at the expense of natural ecosystems, integrating 10% biodiversity

Climate
All major agribusinesses on track to halve

conservation into existing croplands, and adopting a Half-Earth strategy
emissions.
for biodiversity conservation.
Beef production scaled back and production of
Fund put in place to finance global reforestation efforts.
healthy foods is sustainably intensified.
Reform of agricultural subsidies worldwide. Price on carbon increases annually, accelerating Reforestation
reforestation efforts and business models for and other nature-
Stronger policies and financial instruments expand to cover all
carbon storage on land. based solutions are
greenhouse gases.
economically and
Trials of sustainable sequestration strategies are
Technology transfer: ambitious policies and investment lead to adoption socially viable and
Policy
well underway.
of sustainable agriculture among farmers everywhere. scaling rapidly.
All agricultural policies support sustainable
Countries have published maps of areas with potential for carbon storage.
agriculture and forestry and opposing subsidies
Half-Earth is adopted as a global strategy. are eliminated.
Internet coverage reaches all farming areas, accelerating the adoption Precision agriculture becomes a dominant Technology allows
of digital solutions and precision agriculture. technique, reducing global cropland, fertiliser and complete visibility
water use and increasing yields. of global land
Exponential
technology
Seed-planting via drones, industries and communities accelerates massive

use and is linked
reforestation efforts.
to incentives for
Monitoring from space provides real time deforestation, reforestation, land nature-based
restoration and sustainable agriculture data. solutions.
This may be the hardest sector in which to halve emissions rapidly. It can be done, however,
by implementing a small number of nature-based solutions to reduce emissions and store
carbon from the atmosphere. Some of these solutions are resolutely low tech – planting
trees, crop rotation – but can be accelerated by technology and with substantial funding.
Other, more high-tech solutions could be enabled by big data, the Internet of Things and, simply, internet
access. Technology is on the cusp of providing complete real time visibility of land and oceans, analysing
problems and opportunities at a farm scale and allowing policy incentives to be implemented within days
or weeks. Within decades, the internet will reach all but the most remote places on Earth, allowing
farmers access to the world’s knowledge and local data on crop yields and greenhouse gas emissions.
To achieve this, the world needs an unprecedented public-private partnership of

technology companies with agribusinesses, farmers and satellite data providers, along
with governments, to build toolkits for nature-based solutions at all scales. The defaults
for such toolkits must include reducing emissions and maximising carbon storage.
SCALING THE
TRANSFORMATION
CITIES
Cities are interlinked systems of buildings, people Key barriers include the time required to change and convert infrastructure
for fossil-based transport, buildings, and energy systems, difficulty raising
and industries, and networks of transport, energy,
the funds to do so, opposition from vested interests, and inertia and lack of
water, waste, food, information and goods. People use capacity among organisations and citizens. A combination of strong climate
these systems and networks to meet their everyday leadership at several political levels, intelligent policy choices, adoption
needs, including services like health, education and of the best available technologies, and citizen engagement can overcome
these obstacles.
culture. They are governed and influenced by local and
national policies. This chapter addresses cities in their The importance of swiftly putting climate change at the core of urban policy-
current state and analyses their potential to support making cannot be overstated. The number of people living in cities grows by
the exponential change necessary to halve emissions 1.4 million each week. This rapid pace can drive positive change if decision-
makers take the opportunity to adopt the right technologies and systems
by 2030.
and avoid locking in obsolete ones.
Cities occupy only 3% of the world’s landmass,1 but are dense hotspots of
activity: they are home to over half the world’s population and consume over
Copenhagen
two thirds of global energy – accounting for 70% of global CO2 emissions.2
These emissions are not evenly distributed – 18% of all global emissions come
Copenhagen has set a goal for carbon
from just 100 cities – each with emission levels larger than many countries.3,4 neutrality, with programs for cycling,
public transport, recycling and green
Cities are also where risks associated with climate change coalesce5 and space access.
they are often the first level of government to deal with the consequences. Approximately 62% of Copenhagen’s
However, this also means they are uniquely placed to realise the economic population cycles to work or school.
and health benefits of climate action, as well as the avoided costs6.
Many cities are already tackling climate change: in 2017, 7,378 cities from 133
countries pledged action on climate change, representing 16.9% of the global Delivering the necessary emissions reductions will be demanding. But cities
population.7 Also, 27 cities, representing 54 million people, saw emissions fall have historically proved that they can develop, implement and dramatically
by at least 10% over a five-year period to 2018, while experiencing an average scale major change over short periods of time. City mayors can be more
economic growth of 3%.8 However, while many cities around the globe have effective than regional or national officials, empowered to take decisive action
made specific commitments that are compatible with the Paris Agreement, with immediate and impactful results. What cities do to address climate
most lack action plans to achieve them. change can set the agenda for the rest of the world.
Halving emissions by 2030

Many cities could halve their emissions relatively easily by strengthening
policies that aim to change the behaviour of businesses and citizens, and
investing in appropriate infrastructure. The technology to halve emissions
is mature and ready to be deployed at scale to reach this target by 2030.
Table 1: Notable climate action initiatives among cities sectors, but it must be carefully coordinated across all policy fronts to avoid
negative social and economic impacts, and to maximise synergistic benefits.
Initiative Number (at 10 June 2019)* Nature of the commitment All parts of the community must be on board, because citizens will be key
to embedding significant technological change.14
C40’s Deadline 83. Of these, nine have Paris Pursuing climate action
20209 Agreement-compatible compatible with the Paris
action plans Agreement Job losses in obsolete industries and other equity issues such as price
increases and economic segregation must be addressed. If these are not
Carbon Neutral 21 Cutting greenhouse gas handled well, they will drive resistance to further change and undermine
Cities Alliance10 emissions by 80-100% by 2050
long- term decarbonisation plans.
or sooner
Carbon 43 Judged by the Carbon The emissions profiles of different cities vary, but studies show the most
Disclosure Disclosure Project to be leading effective ways to halve emissions generally are: the expansion of renewable
Project A-list11 the low-carbon transition
energy in a city’s electricity mix, adoption of low-carbon policies for buildings
Climate Over 594 local and regional Binding resolutions committing (including the retrofitting of existing buildings and strong low-energy
Emergency governments (25 May 2019) governments to develop an standards in new buildings), prioritising sustainable transport and waste
Declaration12 action plan
management solutions, and supporting citizens who adopt more sustainable
Viable Cities Nine Swedish municipalities Designing and implementing lifestyles.15
are collaborating to become action plans to become climate
climate neutral by 2030 neutral and inclusive cities With the right policies, support, and financing, many cities could achieve an
by 2030 through co-creation
electrical grid mix of 50–70% renewables (primarily solar and wind, balanced
between municipalities, citizens,
academia and industry with other zero-emission generation sources) by 2030. By 2017, 123 cities
reported that they had already reached this level,16 and by the end of 2018,
*These lists are not mutually exclusive
more than 200 cities worldwide had committed to 100% renewable electricity
Key strategies with target years between 2020 and 2050.17 Shifting to a grid mix of 50-70%
renewables would achieve 25–45% of the total emission reductions needed
Cities are in a unique position. They have the power to improve quality of
in that time frame.18 More details on accelerating the renewable energy rollout
life for all citizens by dramatically reducing emissions and building climate
can be found in the Energy Systems chapter.
resilience. They can simultaneously address air pollution, energy access, job
creation and health concerns.13 Halving emissions by 2030 is possible in all
Energy- and space-efficient buildings, along with low-carbon construction,
can close 20–55% of the gap between current emissions trends and 2030
targets, depending on a city’s climate and population growth. This strategy is
Uppsala crucial, as emissions from construction alone could exhaust the global carbon
Uppsala has agreed a city budget for well below 2°C if strict regulations for low-carbon construction
climate protocol, involving industry, and infrastructure are not in place.15 Near-zero carbon construction is at an
academia, public authorities and
environmental organisations.
early stage of development, but feasible within a decade. In addition, city
governments must ensure that public procurement processes select the most
The city’s target is to become
fossil-fuel free by 2030 and climate
sustainable options19 and plan to incorporate nature-based solutions. These
positive from 2050. can reduce cooling needs in addition to providing a range of other resilience,
social, health and food benefits.20
Infrastructure built before 2030 will determine whether humanity achieves

the commitments made in the Paris Agreement or not. More detail on Shenzhen
reducing the carbon cost of buildings and construction can be found in the
Buildings chapter. Shenzhen has 16,000 electric buses in
operation and is targeting an electric
Low-carbon mobility, such as public transport, cycling, electric vehicles, taxi fleet by 2020.
car-sharing and pooling, and mobility-as-a-service systems, can contribute Shenzhen Bus Group estimates that
emissions reductions equal to 20–45% of the 2030 targets, depending on 440,000 tonnes of CO2 emissions are
avoided yearly.
urban income levels and population density.15
More detail on halving emissions in the travel sector can be found in the
Transport chapter.
Cape Town
Improved waste management can deliver up to 10% of the emissions
reductions needed by 2030,15 depending on existing waste management Cape Town’s WhereIsMyTransport
services and the composition of waste. Improved waste management as a app makes public transport appealing
and accessible, especially for those
strategy for reducing emissions is covered in the Industry chapter (page 58). who depended on private vehicles.
Ambitious cities should also aim to cut carbon beyond their boundaries by The app tracks 1,000+ formal
and informal bus and taxi routes.
addressing emissions from imported goods and services. These emissions
can be up to 60% larger than those from within city boundaries.21 Working with
citizens to reduce their personal carbon footprints is a new frontier for climate
Carbon budgets and emissions targets based on the Paris Agreement would
action in cities, linking carbon budgets to consumer responsibility and urban
allow cities to develop strategies that shift global emissions closer towards
planning. It has great potential to deliver significant emission reductions, and
+1.5°C or +2°C scenarios. Furthermore, increasing the adaptive capacities of
is a fairer way of sharing carbon budgets between cities globally.
cities will make them more resilient, as climate change and extreme weather
impose high costs for societies.
In 2014, Gothenburg in Sweden was one of the first cities to set a consumption-
based emissions target. The city began outreach efforts to reduce the climate
As carbon footprints are highly concentrated in relatively few affluent cities,
impact of air travel, food and goods consumption of its citizens. However, its
targeted measures in a few places can have a huge effect.
target of 3.5 tCO2e consumption-based emissions per capita by 2035 is looking
like it will be difficult to achieve without additional momentum, demonstrating
again the need for effective public engagement strategies.22
Showing leadership
Individual cities, with strong, ambitious leadership, and the right resources
and support, can cut emissions even faster than a halving by 2030. Cities are
an ideal space for climate change leadership to emerge, given the confluence
of high concentration of GDP and global carbon footprints, as well as being
the place where new innovations and technologies are developed.
Intelligent policies
City governments are key players in the transition towards a low-carbon,
sustainable future. City leaders have the power to influence and surpass Vancouver
national targets, delivering ambitious climate plans that not only contribute
to reduced emissions, but also improved quality of life for their citizens. Vancouver will require that all new
buildings are carbon neutral from 2020.
Many cities are already showing leadership in the development and Emissions per square metre in new
dissemination of low-carbon solutions through progressive policies and buildings fell by 43% between 2007
actions. But to fully unleash their potential, cities need to do more. They and 2017.
can exercise massive leverage by introducing alternatives for energy,

transportation and building standards, for example – all of which affect
huge numbers of people.
Smart cities
Eliminating fossil-fuel subsidies would accelerate renewable energy The scale, structure, and organisational and social dynamics of cities offer
deployment and free up financial resources for national governments to invest great potential to scale up transformative digital solutions. However, this
in sustainability and social measures.23 City mayors are directly accountable requires mobilisation of resources and investments towards low-carbon
to their constituents for their decisions, and often more agile than state and technologies and strategies. Bearing in mind the need to ensure that
national elected officials. They can have the power to take decisive action – infrastructure is resilient to future climate change, “smart city” technologies
often with immediate and impactful results. In partnerships with other cities can enable next-generation mobility and electric vehicle breakthroughs,
and levels of government, as well as with private businesses, investors and improvements in energy and space efficiency for buildings, and electricity
civil society, the potential for effective action increases. generation and storage. Meanwhile, real time systems using 5G networks,
Internet of Things and artificial intelligence technologies can optimise
transport and allow citizens to transform their cities. Digital twinning brings
New York City these together to enable planners and city managers to maximise the
efficiency of local processes.
New York City requires buildings over
25,000 square feet to reduce their
emissions by 40% by 2030 and 80%
Furthermore, electrifying cities and preventing fossil-fuel infrastructure lock-
by 2050. in by creating green bonds for solar photovoltaics could contribute to scaling
This will reduce annual CO2e
up the number of cities that commit to a halving of emissions by 2030.
emissions by 3.9 million tonnes
by 2020.
C A L L TO AC T I O N
Oslo
Citizens must be empowered to become part of the low-carbon Oslo has introduced an internal carbon
budget, which aims to halve emissions
transformation of cities, delivering a fast reduction of emissions, as well by 2020.
as health and economic benefits.
By 2030, emissions will be reduced
95% from 1990 levels.
Cities should urgently push for the transformation of finance, so they can
access bonds and debt financing, land value capture, and international and
national financing to enable a low-carbon transition.
Cities should ensure that investments rapidly shift to low-carbon,

climate-resilient and socially responsible infrastructure and technology,
as well as employing strict sustainability reporting, standards and tools.
With low-emissions solutions now often at cost parity with other solutions,
cities should set tough procurement policies.
Cities should aim to halve emissions from existing and new buildings
before 2030, by placing positive pressure on landlords and companies,
requiring emissions reduction targets, climate declarations for new
construction and adoption of best practice standards.
Cities should set consumption emissions targets and support citizens

to adopt more sustainable everyday life practices.
City action plans and carbon budgets should engage all sections of the
community to make the most of synergies and avoid negative impacts.
National governments and international organisations should recognise

the powerful role of cities in achieving the necessary transitions and
work to empower them.
CLIMATE LEADERSHIP
If the Paris Agreement shows a clear vision of where Country climate leadership
we need to be, the carbon law of halving emissions Nations must now step up significantly to deliver on the Paris Agreement,
every decade sets the direction. Rather than putting also described in the “Meeting the 1.5°C climate ambition” and “Policies and
targets”. The emissions targets set by countries are not sufficient to keep the
a goal over the horizon, this places the immediate focus world well below 2°C of warming, let alone aiming for 1.5°C. Current emissions
squarely on the next decade – where solutions to halve pledges commit the world to 3°C warming or higher.1
emissions already exist. Cities, companies and citizens
have a critical role to drive momentum to accelerate But some countries have displayed greater commitments than others. Bhutan
achieved carbon neutrality in 2009. Norway, Finland, Sweden and the UK have
those solutions. now agreed targets to reach net zero emissions by 2030, 2035, 2045 and
2050 respectively. Developing countries like Costa Rica and Fiji have declared
In the last 12 months there has been a step-change in public action on they will be carbon neutral by 2050.
climate, as well as city, company and investor momentum. Still, existing
commitments are not sufficient to deliver the first halving of emissions. Even when national commitments are lacking, regional governments can
If the number of countries, cities, businesses and citizens pledging sufficient make meaningful carbon reduction commitments. For example, even while
cuts reach a critical mass, then we can reach a tipping point to bend the the United States federal government makes plans to withdraw from the
curve towards a 1.5°C degree world. Paris Agreement, the state of California passed a regional law requiring
emissions to be 40% below 1990 levels by the year 2030.2 After that point,
This chapter will explain how climate leaders who are willing to step up, four additional states – Washington, Hawaii, New Mexico and Puerto Rico
go in the frontline, share their results, and inspire others can enable a global have committed to 100% clean electricity, and at least six other states are
movement and a virtuous circle of change. These climate leaders will show considering similar legislation.3
that a rapid halving is not only achievable, but can be done while boosting
prosperity and improving economy and health. To meet the goal of limiting warming to about 1.5°C, it’s essential that all
countries follow the leading nations and raise their pledges, with commitments
to significant reductions by 2030 and net zero emissions by 2050 at the latest.
In particular, high-income countries, with greater historic emissions, have a
responsibility to adopt more ambitious trajectories.4 Developing countries
can get an advantage though by taking advantage of low-carbon technology,
avoiding fossil-fuel dependence of older, high-carbon technology.
But country leadership is not only about commitments. They must also prove
their leadership by setting strong policies and share their policy successes
with others. As further detailed in the policy chapter, countries have a wide
range of policies at hand and need to address a broad range of areas to make
sure that their decarbonisation commitments do not stay as such.
This ranges from removing subsidies and pricing carbon; over curbing
diffusion of old technologies, accelerating new technology development Green to scale labs
and diffusion; via incentivizing behavioural changes and system
transitions to reduce demand and increase efficiency; to supporting The five Nordic countries have
declared a commitment to carbon
nature-based solutions. neutrality and intend to work in support
of 1.5°C trajectories.
With no easy solution at hand, and with the need to safeguard a just The countries have been reducing
transition to all planetary boundaries, countries are up for a challenging emissions from different sectors
task. Even for policies, countries could accelerate transformation by learning while growing their economies.
from each other to a much larger extent. Leaders should make sure to share
their success stories – and failures – and push others to follow.
Cities climate leadership
Cities and urban areas are home to about 55% of the global population,
Country action consistent with the carbon law but account for more than 70% of global emissions.6,7 Despite this, due to
infrastructure of scale and spaces of innovation, cities and city leaders have
a real opportunity to leverage the climate movement among their citizens
Set targets in line with 1.5°C trajectories by 2020.
to deliver major emissions cuts above and beyond what is being pledged
at a national level. Crucially, they should not just promote climate actions,
Implement the broad policy approach described in this report.
but the great opportunities in terms of health and economy that such actions
hold for cities and urban dwellers.
Closely monitor emissions, and take action to make sure they comply
with targets while actively sharing their successes and failures with
Over the past two decades, cities have been steadily making public
others to accelerate the broader transformation.
commitments to reduce emissions. Consortiums such as C40, the Carbon
Neutral Cities Alliance, ICLEI – Local Governments for Sustainability, WWF’s One
Build coalitions with other front-running countries to push the
Planet City Challenge, CDP and the Global Covenant of Mayors, are working to
international processes.
build movements and track cities’ carbon reduction commitments (see Cities
chapter). 78 cities have declared they will be emissions neutral by 2050. 8,9,10,11
Build alliances for climate action where corporates, cities, investors,
academia, civil society and citizens come together to share the same
6,800 cities have committed to reducing the levels of CO2 emissions
mission and influence policy towards raised ambition.
in their territories by at least 20% by 2020 or by at least 40% by 2030.
This approaches the level of commitment required by the carbon law.12
Accelerate high-impact zero-/low-carbon solutions and enable their
More, of course, needs to be done in terms of sharpening existing targets
scaling to other countries.
and growing the number of cities who make new ones. In particular more
Share results of climate action to help spread effective methods across needs to be done in terms of implementation.
the world and partner with other countries on climate action campaigns.
But there’s a real opportunity to deliver health, clean air, transport, efficiency
and economic benefits on top of the direct benefits of emissions reductions.
Climate action is highly popular with city dwellers, so city officials willing to
display real leadership in this area have much to gain and little to lose.
City action consistent with the carbon law Company climate leadership
Many industries, for example fashion, construction, materials and consumer
Set targets to halve emissions before 2030 (in 5–10 years) including goods, must evolve rapidly to thrive and stay profitable over time in a carbon-
emissions from imported goods and services. constrained world. Business models will need to change from ownership
towards sharing, from product to service and from linear to circular models
Set targets of net zero emissions before 2050. enabled by digital technologies. This may create the foundation for disruption
and transformation of all industries in the next few years, and has been
Monitor emissions and act to ensure they comply with targets. described as “the largest business opportunity on the planet”.13 Companies
will need to be at the forefront to gain a competitive advantage and shift to
Build alliances for climate action where corporates, investors, academia, zero- and low-carbon solutions such as exemplified in the Mission Innovation
civil society and citizens come together sharing the same mission and solutions framework.14
influence policy towards raised ambition.
A growing number of companies are proving that reducing emissions does
Accelerate high-impact zero-carbon solutions and strategies and ensure not need to harm the bottom line but can drive competitive advantage.
they scale to other cities. Major firms like Stanley Black & Decker, Unilever, Dell Technologies, IKEA,
Apple, Google, BT, Ericsson, Danfoss and Intel are systematically and quickly
Partner with other cities on climate strategy and action. shrinking their carbon footprint, setting strong targets for future cuts, and
expanding target setting and achievement to their suppliers.
Share solutions and the results of climate action to help spread
effective methods across the world. Companies which build climate leadership into their core strategies seem
to be outperforming those that fail to show leadership.15,16 A study of 300
Intervene with national policymakers to enable a shift towards full companies in Sweden found an overwhelming consensus that climate action
decarbonisation of their territories and join alliances for climate action. strengthens a brand, improves customer loyalty, and boosts recruitment –
on top of the direct benefits that reducing emissions brings.17 Research
shows that CEOs are aware of the importance of building a social enterprise
and in 2019 they cited “their impact on society including the environment”
as their most important measure of success.18
Several initiatives are tracking the pace of corporate decarbonisation

pledges. Momentum is growing, but the number of companies setting targets
in line with 1.5°C needs to grow rapidly. To date, few companies have made
Frontrunner coalitions, cities commitments to halve emissions in 10 years or less.
Deadline 2020 is an initiative by C40,
that sets the level of ambition needed
to ensure cities meet the targets of
the Paris Agreement.
103 leading cities committed to
urgently pursue high ambition
climate action.
Company action consistent with the carbon law

Corporate initiatives
The We Mean Business Coalition tracks 1,560 commitments from Commit to contribute to the Paris Agreement and a 1.5°C planet.
997 companies with a combined market cap of US$19.3 trillion.19 Global leaders now call for business leaders to commit to 1.5°C targets.24
In the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi), more than 634 Set targets to halve emissions faster than every decade (e.g. every 5 years)
corporations are taking action to set climate targets in line with and target net zero. Closely monitor emissions, and take action to make
the Paris Agreement.20 sure they comply with targets.
175 companies have committed to switching to 100% renewable Set targets to halve emissions across the whole value chain including
energy as part of the RE100 initiative.21 requirements on suppliers within a decade and offset unavoidable
emissions.
Align portfolio and value proposition with a 1.5°C planet, accelerate high
It will be increasingly important that key industries develop roadmaps to positive climate impact solutions in the market and ensure they scale
shift business propositions towards zero-carbon solutions. Fossil Free exponentially.
Sweden, a government initiative, is coordinating the development of a series
of roadmaps, divided by industry sector, that set out essential steps to phase Communicate emissions, targets and results in decarbonisation, and
out the use of fossil-fuels by 2045. So far, roadmaps have been published scaling of climate-positive business transparently and regularly according
for 13 industries including cement, construction, aviation, minerals, retail, to standards.
forestry, transport, sea transport, and steel.22
Enable and participate in common industry-sector initiatives and share
Finally, the technology and finance sectors have a particularly strong results of climate action to help spread effective methods across all
opportunity to influence the future due to their disruptive power. This is industry sectors.
further described in the exponential technology and finance chapters.
As an example, the step-up declaration, launched at the Global Climate Advocate to promote a shift towards full decarbonisation of their
Action Summit in September 2018 includes commitments consistent with operations and join alliances for climate action.
the carbon law from several hundred companies predominantly from the
information and communications (ICT) industry.23
Citizen climate leadership

Climate change has become a top concern to people across the world.25 Young movements
Since the release of the IPCC 1.5°C special report26 people are increasingly
Fridays for Future with Greta Thunberg and her followers have
voicing concern and willingness to act. In places this is translating to influence striked in over 2,000 locations with millions of people on the
in democratic elections, behavioural change, and greater awareness of the streets. Strikes have grown from 80 cities in 20 countries in January
role of consumption in driving emissions. But exponential change can only be 2019 to around 400 cities in over 60 countries.27 In the May 2019 EU
achieved if we recognize that only a minority has climate change mitigation elections, political parties with strong climate agendas polled well.
as a key priority and guiding star. Other groups have social status, and social Some of this impact was attributed to the “Greta Effect”.28
norm compliance at the core. So to accelerate behavioural change, this must
Extinction Rebellion (abbreviated as XR) is a socio-political
be taken into account. movement originating from London with the stated aim of using
civil disobedience and nonviolent resistance to protest against
While this text focuses on the wealthy, which have the highest responsibility climate breakdown, biodiversity loss, and the risk of social and
for the emissions, the leadership of people in all parts of the world is of ecological collapse. It may have influenced the attitude shift where
utmost importance – this is not the least proven by the indigenous people of 76% of Britons shortly after the protests agreed that the planet is
the rain forests or the taiga, committed to saving the forests and to holding in a climate emergency. Thereafter, the UK passed the motion to
their governments accountable. declare a climate emergency, and the Labour party pledged to put
climate at the heart of their agenda.29, 30
A movement on the rise
People can be effective drivers of change. Citizen movements have reshaped Both XR and Fridays for Future make the case to declare a
society during the 20th century. From civil rights and gay rights to the Climate and Nature Emergency. Climate emergencies have been
environmental movement, the achievements have been enormous. In 2018, declared by 975 jurisdictions and local governments, which cover
new movements for climate action, for example Fridays for Future and the 212 million citizens. Cities include Vancouver, Milano, Paris, Napoli,
Extinction Rebellion, swept the world. Edinburgh, Oxford, Leeds, Cambridge, Ottawa, Geneva, Basel,
Berkeley, San Francisco.31, 32
Fridays for Future
The Fridays For Future movement

organizes climate strikes around
the world.
7,427 strikes have taken place in

more than 100 countries worldwide.
Citizens driving sustainable consumption “Every time you spend

According to Oxfam analysis, the richest 10% of the world’s population are
responsible for about 50% of lifestyle consumption emissions. More than money, you’re casting a
half the world’s population is now considered middle or upper class, with five
people joining these ranks every second.33 People with more money generally
vote for the kind of
consume more, though after a certain level of income happiness seems to
level off.34 As the middle class grows it’s vital that people aspire to lifestyles
world you want.”
that combine high quality of life with low emissions.
According to one survey, two thirds of consumers are willing to change Anna Lappé
their consumption patterns to reduce their environmental impact.35 American author and educator
But the challenge for consumers is to go from single ethical purchases
to halving their emissions.
This requires a radical shift in the type of food, housing and travelling
being consumed.36
However, recent data show that individuals with high-carbon lifestyles can
already today halve their emissions in less than a single year with maintained
or enhanced quality of life.37
There are also growing movements in regards to sustainable food, travelling and Examples of sustainable consumption shift
consumption and these are essential in order to accelerate the shift of focus by
Early signs can be seen in trend shifts towards sustainable consumption.
the business sector towards solutions which are aligned with a 1.5°C planet.
The US resale market has grown 21 times faster than the overall
retail market over the past three years. It is projected to grow to
nearly 1.5 times the size of fast fashion. Resale can be key to a
circular fashion industry.38, 39
Growth in meat consumption is showing signs of slowing in some

OECD countries such as Sweden where meat consumption is
falling.40 The global vegan food market size is expected to reach
US$24.06 billion by 2025 with a yearly growth rate of nearly 10%.41
A Swedish-born anti-flying movement is spreading to other

European countries. A new Swedish word “flygskam, which
translates as “flight shame”, is taking off and passenger
numbers decreased in 2018.42
Finally, the wealthiest 0.5% of the global population are responsible for Individual action consistent with the carbon law
more emissions than 10% of the poorest.43 The emissions of the wealthy
are primarily driven by their extreme mobility, conspicuous consumption
Engage with politicians, companies and cities, demanding solutions
patterns, and the maintenance of spacious residences in multiple locations.
that make it possible to choose climate-friendly lifestyles, and support
There is a largely untapped potential in reducing their emissions and their
those who deliver those solutions.
contribution to the climate crisis. The world’s billionaires have driven most of
the main breakthrough innovations in the last 40 years.44 And their leadership
Make climate change a factor in decisions around diet, travel, shopping,
in adopting renewable energy technologies could generate new knowledge,
living and financial savings and home energy, shifting consumption
decrease prices and lead to technology diffusion. They can shift investments
towards low-carbon and healthy alternatives and share experiences.
from high-carbon towards cleantech and engage in forest and land protection.
Use your role as employees to push, support and accelerate climate
Citizens at work mitigation efforts of their companies.
Employees can wield significant influence in the workplace, particularly as
companies compete to attract top talent. The idea that companies should Join global and local climate movements to influence policymakers.
serve the greater societal good is gaining traction, and the social enterprise
is now becoming mainstream. About half of millennials (55%) believe business
has a positive impact on society, according to a 2019 survey, down from 61%
in the previous year.
Four out of ten millennials reported that that they have chosen to deepen
relationships with companies they believe have a positive impact, and nearly
as many have said they have lessened relationships with companies having
a negative environmental impact.45
POLICIES AND TARGETS
This roadmap clearly demonstrates that the technology Setting targets

and solutions already exist to halve emissions by 2030 It is important to draw a distinction between goals and targets that set
in line with the carbon law. But scaling them swiftly and the direction and ambition, and the policy instruments which drive actual
emissions reductions.
exponentially around the world requires an extensive
range of strong and coordinated policies. This chapter Setting science-based emissions reduction targets is an important part of the
covers broad policy perspectives, while the sector- policy landscape. While carbon neutrality commitments have been made by
specific chapters cover specific policy suggestions Bhutan (2009), Tuvalu (2020), Costa Rica (2021), Norway (2030), Finland (2035),
Iceland (2040), Sweden (2045) and the UK (2050), among others, the bulk of
in those areas. the world’s countries are yet to display the level of ambition necessary to
keep the world within 1.5°C of warming.4 The scope of existing commitments
Since the first edition of this roadmap, the IPCC’s special report on 1.5°C 1 may also differ considerably. At current pledge levels, the world is still on track
has been published, 20 countries have enacted in law or are discussing for at least 3°C of warming.5
net zero targets by 2050 or sooner, several countries have declared a
climate emergency,2 some US politicians have advocated a Green New Deal, International agreements have an important role to play in the setting
and Canada has established a climate fee and dividend system. Are we of these targets, but politics at a global level is slow and the window of
approaching a climate policy action tipping point? opportunity is closing. Climate leadership from frontrunning coalitions6,7 and
policymakers at smaller scales such as New York’s commitment to carbon
On the flip side, global emissions are still increasing rapidly, renewables neutrality by 2050,8,9,10 are critical to drive international processes to success,
investments falling and fossil-fuel subsidies increased in 2018. To date, while while inspiring others through the real economic and societal benefits that
our political systems have in some cases successfully delivered emissions decarbonisation brings.
reductions of a couple of percent per year, the world has never been close to
the speed and scale of transition required to halve emissions by 2030.3 Achieving targets
In this report, we advocate for halving global emissions every decade until
This must change. History shows that rapid transitions of the economy are
2050, with richer countries moving even faster. To achieve this, it is vital to set
possible in times of crisis, and all economies can learn from those that are
corresponding interim goals, representing two to five year intervals, and to
transitioning rapidly. For the first halving, we need efficient and effective
realise that halving at a global scale means that wealthy countries with high
policy frameworks for rapid technology diffusion and behavioural changes,
emissions per person have a responsibility to act faster.
making it easy for people and companies to do the right thing – and we need
them now. Ultimately, such radical shifts demand leadership, so the starting Countries have already promised to meet Nationally Determined
point of transformative policies will boil down to the interaction between bold Contributions (NDCs) under the Paris Agreement11, but these must be
political leaders and pressure from citizens and businesses. enhanced to align with 1.5°C trajectories by 2020, and given the same weight
and attention as GDP. This demands the governance and administrative
capacity for close monitoring of emissions reductions, yearly or even
quarterly, and to create concrete roadmaps, tools, and feedback loops that
allow for the regular correction of insufficient progress.
As well as halving emissions every decade, this roadmap also stresses the
importance of reaching global carbon neutrality by 2050. To accomplish this,
it is vital to make sure that policies driving the first halving do not delay the A price on carbon
final 2050 achievements.
The price we pay for goods and services rarely reflects their damage to the
environment. Putting a price on carbon, by making producers and consumers
An important role for policymakers would therefore be to address conflicts
pay more for products with high emissions under the “polluter pays principle”
between short and long-term goals. This includes, for example, policies that
would be fairer and boost sustainable alternatives. Different implementations
coordinate electrification of road transport and the use of biofuels, policies
exist. First, there is a choice between emissions trading and taxes. Second,
to coordinate supply and demand, and coordination between different
a system may be revenue-neutral or revenues could be used to fund
administrative levels. Similarly, decarbonisation goals should be aligned with
investments. The revenue-neutral option might be more acceptable
biodiversity goals and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
to business and the public, while the latter may cut emissions faster.
Removal of fossil-fuel subsidies A total of 96 nations, representing 55% of emissions, are planning or
Fossil-fuel subsidies contribute to climate change by keeping the price of considering carbon pricing in their NDCs.17 Currently 57 carbon pricing
fossil-fuels artificially low, encouraging greater emissions by increasing initiatives are implemented or scheduled at national and sub-national levels,
unsustainable consumption and production.12 Without these subsidies, which covering around 20% of global emissions.18 Overall, carbon pricing in 2018
equal 85% of all subsidies, total carbon emissions in 2015 would have been accounted for approximately US$44 billion in carbon revenues, up US$11
28% lower, and there would have been 46% fewer air pollution deaths, while billion since 2017. In addition, over 1,300 companies are using or planning
additional government revenues would contribute an additional 3.8% of internal carbon pricing within two years.
GDP.13 Globally, direct subsidies to the fossil-fuel industry total an astonishing
US$300–680 billion per year. But the existence of a carbon pricing scheme alone is not sufficient. Two key
variables impact how carbon price trajectories deliver on the Paris Agreement.
When including indirect subsidies, the amount grows to US$5.2 trillion,13 The first is the level – it must be at a magnitude that delivers decarbonisation
which represents 6.5% of global GDP (2017 estimate). This is greater than and provide incentives for sustainable alternatives, meaning not so low that it
the GDP of all states except the US, European Union and China. The biggest has no effect, but also not so high that it is rejected by industry and the public.
subsidisers are China, United States, Russia, the European Union and India, According to the World Bank, less than 1% of emissions are covered by a
and while these measures are often claimed to support underprivileged carbon price that is consistent with the Paris Agreement.19, 17 It is evident that
groups, just 8% of the money trickles down to the poorest 20% of the current pledges need to ramp up without further delay.
population.
The IPCC’s special report on 1.5°C suggests an appropriate carbon price in
A global movement to phase out fossil-fuel subsidies may be one of the most 2030 would be between US$135–6050/tCO2e.20 Numbers suggested by the
effective ways of reducing emissions and encouraging the development and High-Level Commission on Carbon Prices are somewhat lower, but emphasise
acceleration of renewable energy and energy efficiency technologies. Several the need for complementary policies.17 In any case, regional conditions and
governments are moving in this direction, although their efforts and speed price sensitivity variations must be considered when setting a price – past
must increase. The G20 has committed to phase out fossil fuel subsidies over experience shows that industries adapt quickly, and that high carbon prices
the medium term, while the G7 intends to eliminate fossil fuel subsidies by are needed to reduce car travel.
2025.14,15 Though such promises are welcome,16 they need to be delivered.
They are also far from sufficient – all subsidies must be phased out without Gaining and maintaining public and business support for carbon pricing,
delay and not in an unspecified future. a key importance, is challenging.21 The World Bank recommends a
comprehensive approach with careful planning, design and implementation,
the inclusion of stakeholders, a focus on local co-benefits, acceptable Accelerating the transition
revenue usage strategies and protection of vulnerable groups.
There is no silver bullet. Beyond carbon pricing and trade systems,
the carbon law demands coherent policy packages focused on a transition
Carbon pricing at a level acceptable to the public has so far not been enough
to net neutrality by 2050. These must simultaneously curb diffusion of old
to drive a full decarbonisation of society, it merelys play a supporting role by
technologies, accelerate new technology development and diffusion, and
levelling the playing field.22 Additional policy packages are necessary to drive
change behaviours to reduce demand. First, frameworks must be created
the decarbonisation of different sectors, as well as to drive innovation and the
to suppress emissions and carbon-intensive processes, removing lock-
scaling of technology and best practice around the world.
in effects from old technologies and creating space for low-emissions
alternatives to thrive by removing barriers to their development.
Progressive carbon pricing This process necessitates the removal of high-carbon policies and incentives,
which may include fossil-fuel subsidies, fossil-fuel supply and infrastructure
Sweden has the highest carbon price
in the world at US$139 per tonne of and anything that leads to deforestation. Sovereign wealth funds and
carbon dioxide. development bank investments must also be refocused on climate resilience,
Since its introduction in 1991, halving emissions by 2030, and reaching net zero emissions by 2050.
the Swedish economy has grown by
60% and territory carbon emissions Additionally, policymakers must consider how best to enable technologies
have decreased by 25%.
and business models that can deliver deep and rapid decarbonisation of all
sectors. For instance, the fast development of solar and wind was driven by
early experimentation and market creation through feed-in tariffs. This means,
among other things, that cost, efficiency and the sequential aspects of
Pricing carbon through trade
technology diffusion must be taken into account.
Though carbon pricing is often associated with taxes, emission trading
systems also have an important role to play. By far the largest is the EU Policymakers may consider, for example, policies that drive rapid scaling
emissions trading scheme, which includes about 40% of total greenhouse gas of new low-carbon technologies and processes, as well as policies that
emissions in the EU, mostly big industry, power plants, and EU-internal flights. help companies to manage financial transition risks through public-private
After a weak start, the system was substantially strengthened in early 2019 partnerships and risk-sharing policies. There is also a need to support the
by accelerating the reduction of emitted emissions rights, and adding new diffusion of low-carbon solutions to low- and middle- income countries.
regulations regarding annulments of emission rights.
The system is now a much stronger policy instrument though still far from
the level required to meet the carbon law. At this point, since the system Transformative policies –
includes only the parts of the economy that should be easiest to decarbonise, the case of Norway
it either needs strengthening to reduce the emissions further, or to include Electric vehicles are growing in Norway
a wider range of emissions. It must also be complemented with other due to a consistent policy approach,
including tax and VAT reductions, and
measures, such as those related to land use change and forestry, or the toll road and ferry discounts.
international transport sector. The combined market share of
electric and plug-in hybrid vehicles
in Norway is about 50%.
Demand & supply

Demand-side policies, such as energy efficiency regulations and EU lighting efficiency
implementation of circular economy principles, have a huge role to play in
the decarbonisation process and are covered extensively throughout the The EU has expanded its successful
electricity efficiency limits to cover
report. Such policies include, for example, stimulating demand for low-carbon halogen bulbs.
solutions through public procurement and infrastructure investments,
stop dates for high-carbon legacy technology and systems, and also This is expected to save 3.4 million
tonnes of CO2 emissions and
policies that drive behavioural changes. 9.4 TWh annually.
Electricity can be easily decarbonised, so rapid electrification of energy use

is key. Other policy options to reduce demand include well-proven energy On the supply side, there is also increasing evidence that policies that restrict
efficiency standards, open competition, support for low-carbon technologies, the supply of fossil-fuels can also play a vital role.25,26,27,28 Decreasing fossil-
third-party financing of low-emission technologies, digital monitoring, fuel production, in line with the goals of the Paris Agreement, can help avoid
repurposing of infrastructure, recognition and awards, carbon lock-in and prevent stranded communities and assets. These policies
and design competitions.23 also come with major benefits for human health and the local environment29
and, given their narrower focus, can be easier and cheaper to administer
The combined effects of these policies can be substantial. The American than many demand-side policies.27
Council for an Energy Efficient Economy (ACEEE) says that efficiency
measures have the potential to reduce emissions in the US by 600 million These approaches are gaining traction, including bans on oil exploration in
tonnes by 2030, increase GDP by US$17 billion, create 611,000 new jobs, Costa Rica, France and Belize and the shuttering of outdated coal mines in
and lower the average American’s utility bills.24 China.30 Various countries have also begun to develop plans and policies to
support workers and communities as they transition away from fossil-fuels.31,
Beyond energy efficiency, general resource efficiency and circular economy 32, 33, 34, 35
Policies in this area include taxes related to resource production and
approaches have significant climate implications and deserve similar export, cap-and-trade systems for production rights, restricted leasing
attention. Policy approaches in this area include, for example, materials of state-owned lands and waters, and prohibiting specific technologies,
efficiency standards and coalitions to drive adoption of these standards just to mention a few.
and practices.25
Nevertheless, a recent analysis of countries’ NDCs and long-term low
While the demand-side measures are vitally important and have been in focus greenhouse gas emission development strategies (LT-LEDS) shows that
for the past two decades, supply-side policies could complement these. Such fossil-fuel producers are not yet aligning their investment, extraction and
policies may include transition support, incentives for companies with high delivery systems with the Paris Agreement’s goals.36 The establishment of
climate ambitions through tax deductions, favoured status in procurement an extraction-based accounting system – in parallel with existing territorial
and recognition through certification schemes. greenhouse gas accounting approaches – would push countries to integrate
their fossil-fuel production in their climate strategies.37,38
Impacting behaviours Finally, it is important to consider gender aspects.41 Habits and environmental
footprints can differ a lot between men and women, and they may be affected
While many of the solutions needed for a global halving of emissions rely
differently by climate policies and adopt them differently. Of particular
on scaling new and better technologies, others rely primarily on changing
importance is the connection between climate impact, population growth and
existing practices. Here, policymakers can play a major role in considering
the empowerment of women across the world. Project Drawdown includes
how to influence individual behaviour and raise awareness to enhance the
educating girls and family planning in its top ten climate solutions, as these
uptake of low-carbon solutions and go beyond pure market mechanisms.
limit population growth.42
Behavioural strategies can have a major impact, alongside digital solutions
in policy design, analysis and communication.
Digital climate strategies
A focus on other benefits can also drive emissions reductions. Health may be The transition to a zero-carbon society will happen in parallel with the
a faster road towards lowered meat consumption and reducing transportation fourth industrial revolution, but the digital revolution and sustainability are
emissions, while safety, independence and resilience might be a strong driver often considered independently, with a lack of cross-policy coordination.
for the growth of solar power. Labelling, taxes, and bans have fundamentally By integrating climate change and technology policies, not least in strategy
changed the way smoking is seen in many countries – could climate damaging and planning processes, the best low-carbon solutions rise to the top.
practices be phased out in a similar way?
In addition to establishing a proper digital infrastructure for the coming
A balanced, flexible and just transition decades, policymakers should also incentivise the innovation, use and scaling
of digital solutions for deep decarbonisation, provide space for new solutions
Policies related to climate recovery are as important as those that drive a
and infrastructure, dismantle barriers to their implementation, and work to
transition towards low-carbon technologies and processes. These include
anticipate and suppress undesired side effects. Building expertise on a global
policies for nature-based solutions that drive reforestation and sustainable
level, ensuring equal access to data, reaching across traditional barriers and
intensification of agriculture, as well as policies for the development of carbon
focusing on overall system benefits are also key priorities.43
capture and storage. In this area, adaptation and resilience need careful
consideration, in particular the risks of new technologies and coordination
of climate and biodiversity strategies. The policy process
Designing and implementing policy is not always straightforward. Barriers
Any policies implemented must balance short-term emissions reductions can include a lack of awareness of solutions available and their benefits,
with the long-term societal transitions demanded by the carbon law, and align limited administrative capacity and lack of access to capital. An the other end,
with local targets, technologies and contexts. They must be both predictable leadership engagement, informed stakeholders, and governance and capacity
enough for companies to build business models on, and flexible enough to building are key to success. Digital tools can help both to reduce barriers and
handle rapid decarbonisation and change in a dynamic society. to enhance opportunities.
It is also fundamental for policy acceptance and success to avoid A more systematic sharing of policies across the globe can address the
disproportionate impact on vulnerable groups and ensure a just transition. problem of countries failing to learn from others. Existing climate policy
To achieve this, measures such as financial compensation and social databases could be grown into intelligent open-access platforms, with
programmes could be directly funded by the revenues from carbon pricing. automated collection of policies and dynamic identification and surfacing
This applies at both local and global scales.39 As an example, while many jobs of top practices in different areas, driven by machine learning.
could potentially be lost in coal regions, local economies can adapt and create
new opportunities in clean energy.40
Drafting new policies or interaction around specific policies could happen

in online meeting rooms, and artificial intelligence could analyse policy ideas
and the effects of complex policy packages.
Developing transformative policies, especially at the pace demanded by

the carbon law, involves large uncertainties – which calls for collaborative,
iterative and adaptive approaches with multiple pathways to facilitate gradual
learning.44 This is a situation that is regularly experienced in the digital
industry, which must constantly tackle short timelines and a market that
is continually disrupted by new entrants.
Success here has involved jointly developed standards, and scalable,

standardised products. Translating these learnings into the public sector
by seeing policies as scalable products could mean adopting techniques Policy collections
like experimentation, pilot schemes, rapid iterative development models, The UNFCCC Policy Options Database collects good mitigation
open-source sharing and even crowdsourcing and policy hackathons to practices. It also registers climate action by non-state actors in
brainstorm ideas and demonstrate real-world feasibility. the NAZCA portal.
unfccc.int/resource/climateaction2020/tep/policy-options/index
Advanced data analysis and visualisation techniques may also be used to
.html
anchor policy proposals and show progress and politicians’ commitments,
as well as the consequences of policy launches and withdrawals. ClimateView, The Green Growth Knowledge Platform (GGKP) was established by
the platform adopted in this project, clearly shows how digital solutions can the Global Green Growth Institute, the OECD, the UNEP and the World
provide a comprehensive overview of policies in use.45 Engaging with citizens Bank and offers guidance to policymakers.
and businesses is critical for the success of policy, and even the strongest www.greengrowthknowledge.org/
incentive will not help if people don’t know about it. Already, digital solutions
are used in measuring and monitoring climate impacts and the effects of The German NewClimate Institute for Climate Policy and Global
policies, and this could be further enhanced through new technologies. Sustainability covers 3,600 existing climate change mitigation policies
and practices.
www.climatepolicydatabase.org/
The Grantham Institute’s Climate Change Laws of the World includes

1,500 examples of climate legislation.
www.lse.ac.uk/GranthamInstitute/climate-change-laws-of-the-wo
rld/
The American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy (ACEEE)

offers energy-efficiency policy guidance to states.
aceee.org/sector/state-policy/toolkit
All countries must enhance their NDCs in line with 1.5°C trajectories by Technology and climate strategies must become one and the same
2020 which means halving emissions by 2030 at the latest and reaching thing, with extensive mutual reinforcement.
net zero by 2050.
Digital tools to accelerate reuse of efficient decarbonisation policies
Ensure that national decision-making, budgets, tax systems and globally must be created and widely adopted.
technology strategies are aligned with a 1.5°C world.
Circular economy, digital economy and sharing economy models must
Policies to reduce emissions throughout society must roll out in parallel. be incentivised and directed towards decarbonisation.
This means coherent policy packages which support technologies and
business models for deep decarbonisation, while suppressing carbon- Behavioural changes, like shifts towards healthy diets, cycling and
intensive processes. public transport, must be incentivised and accelerated.
All sectors need concrete emissions reduction roadmaps. Currently, The development of nature-based solutions, which create carbon sinks
the largest focus is on the energy sector – transport, buildings, food, and enhance biodiversity, must be prioritised alongside technology and
agriculture and industry must follow. behavioural changes and agricultural subsidies should be revised.
All fossil-fuel subsidies should be phased out without delay and these
commitments must be integrated with NDCs alongside stronger standards
on emissions, efficiency and performance, supply-side measures and a
wide range of policies to support this transition.
Set stop dates for fossil-fuel extraction and use.
Carbon pricing must be implemented at sufficient price levels and

coverage to scale swiftly and globally.
Climate policies must be implemented in a way that ensures a just

transition – protecting vulnerable communities and without violating
other planetary boundaries.
OPEN DATA FOR
CLIMATE ACTION
The climate challenge is unlike other challenges facing “If you can’t measure it,
the world, in that most nations, cities and companies
share a common goal: Transitioning to an economy you can’t improve it.”
and society largely free from fossil-fuels in order to
safeguard humanity. To track the change, open and
accessible data is crucial. Peter Drucker
Founder of modern management
This report sets out a pathway to achieve that goal within the bounds of
existing societal frameworks. That path relies on a complex combination
of mutually reinforcing actions by society, markets and governments –
from policies, to technology, to behavioural change.
Drawing up a detailed plan for 15 years ahead is not easy. We cannot expect
to correctly predict the effects of incentives, the costs of new technologies,
or the momentum of social change. The challenge is complex, with many
unknowns and many actors involved.
So instead, this report takes a different approach. It outlines the direction and
speed required and the first steps in more detail, so we can immediately begin. A strong open data ecosystem would help:
But the later stages are left deliberately imprecise, so the combination of
needed actions and solutions can evolve along the way. By asking questions
Companies to set targets and shift revenues to projects aligned
like: “Where do we stand now?”, “What has worked and what has not?”,
with a carbon law trajectory, and track their progress.
“Where is action needed?” and “What is going well?”, we can accelerate
the experience and knowledge sharing that will drive an effective transition
To drive circular economy and zero-carbon value chains – by
to a low-emissions world.
tracking products, materials and component data.
The question becomes not “how do we set up a detailed master roadmap?”

The finance sector to benchmark companies and shift to climate-
but “how do we provide governments, businesses and citizens with shared
positive portfolios.
roadmaps that show the way, which can be defined and redefined as we go?”.
Cities and institutions to set requirements on public procurement,
low-carbon infrastructure and building projects.
Consumers and citizens to determine their carbon footprint and

change their lifestyle to align with a 1.5°C world

Nations and cities to pursue low-carbon strategies and policies.
Example: Panorama – Sweden’s Climate Dashboard

Construction data One case study of open data being used to accelerate a climate transition
transparency is Sweden’s Climate Dashboard. This service was created by the Swedish
A tool developed by Skanska will make Climate Policy Council, Environment Protection Agency and Energy Agency,
emissions data available for 10,000 as a means to support the nation in its commitment to become a fossil-free
different construction materials.
state by 2045.
Embodied carbon makes up
11% of total global greenhouse
gas emissions.
Panorama, which is based on a global platform called ClimateView, takes
the form of an easily explorable online dashboard. By zooming in and out,
the dashboard provides both an overview of the government’s work
towards tackling climate change as well as the ability to drill down into
Accessible data
the more granular detail, including the current CO2 emissions per sector,
All of the data needed to create these common roadmaps is already proposed and approved policies, and indicators of the progress made.
accessible. For example, most government policies and roadmaps are public
and so are emission statistics, energy consumption and most other data The dashboard is updated on a monthly basis, and is collated and edited
describing a nation’s or a city’s economy and governance. New technologies, by the Swedish Climate Policy council. Stakeholders such as NGOs and
success cases, and research are readily available and published. businesses can make suggestions and feedback, directly in the dashboard,
thus creating a common language and place to continuously update and
However “available” does not mean “accessible” – it has not yet been share the rate of the transition and possible pathways ahead.
collected and visualised together. Today the data is spread out, not comparable,
not indexed or categorised in a common framework. If we want to use data Built on the principles of agile methods, open data and transparency and
to facilitate change, that data has to be accessible, understandable and populated with emissions data, solution potential, indicators and actions,
clearly visualised. Panorama allows the long term goal of a fossil-free society to be broken
down into shorter-term indicators that can be measured and responded
Successful emissions cuts will depend on assembling and organising data to on a quarterly basis.
of all kinds, so that relationships are clear, cause and effect are manifested,
and diverging opinions and assumptions explained. By methodically In Sweden, this common platform is already allowing a new kind of
presenting open data in this way, we can see exactly where we stand, collaboration to develop, and the goal is to build on that momentum
focus on the right actions, hold stakeholders accountable and spread best to deliver change for everyone involved in the transition, from citizens,
practice. In doing so, roadmaps become vital tools that can be used to drive to politics, to business. With the data publicly available and accessible,
action and guide strategies. it allows anyone to become a watchdog for the nation’s transition.
We need open data which is well organised, scalable, maintainable, and can www.klimatpolitiskaradet.se/panorama
be accessed programmatically (i.e. through open APIs). We need to provide
a data structure that lets users follow policies and solutions, see their effect
on leading indicators, and quantify their impact on emissions savings.
A structure that makes it possible to update, compare and share these
findings across nations, sectors and businesses.
Food data – show
your numbers
Oatly is labelling all its products Climate data is often fragmented and of poor quality. It must be
with carbon footprints and has called standardised and published on open platforms.
on the food industry to do the same in
outdoor advertising.
Data on targets, strategies, implementation and success should be
Oat milk has less than half the emissions
published openly to allow knowledge-sharing between citizens, industries,
footprint of a glass of dairy milk.
companies, cities and nations.
Key performance indicators should be developed for companies and

organisations, allowing for comparisons, benchmarking and target-setting.
Value chains can be decarbonised and efficiency boosted by global,

automated tracking of the carbon footprints of components, products,
materials and services.
The digital technology sector can fund global, open initiatives to gather
and organise this data rapidly, boosting its impact.
FINANCING
THE TRANSITION
The economic benefit of a low-carbon future is

US$26 trillion by 2030 compared with staying on the
current high-carbon pathway. The markets are beginning
to notice the benefits. As prices of low-carbon solutions
tumble, the finance sector has reached a tipping point.
Confidence in the most exposed parts of the fossil-fuel
industry (coal) is wavering. This risks a carbon bubble.
But leadership is emerging to help ensure an orderly
transition to a low-carbon economy.
This chapter outlines how the carbon law can be “If some
integrated into investment decisions to accelerate the
economic transformation. It also looks at places with
disruptive potential. Fintech and innovations in finance
companies and
like crowdfunding promise new opportunities to support
societal goals and accelerate this transition.
industries fail
to adjust to this
new world, they
will fail to exist.”
Mark Carney
governor of the Bank of England
François Villeroy de Galhau

governor of Banque de France
Frank Elderson
chair of the Network for
Greening the Financial System
The carbon law trajectory demands that capital flows rapidly shift from
high-emissions investments towards sustainable investments. Low-carbon
infrastructure, while qualitatively different to carbon-intensive options, is now
comparable on price – and the price is falling rapidly. In 2019, the UK became
the first G7 country to announce it will reach net zero-emissions by 2050.
The estimated cost is likely to be no greater than the UK’s existing legally
binding commitment to reduce emissions 80% by 2050, which is around
1-2% of the UK’s GDP, and will bring many economic and health benefits.1
Worldwide, US$90 trillion will be invested in infrastructure between now
and 2030.2 How, then, do we ensure that capital flows in the right direction
and this redistribution benefits the most people?
Ant forest Crowdfunding low-

emissions ideas
With 800 million customers, China’s
Ant Financial has captured over In the UK, Abundance Investment
half China’s US$13 trillion mobile crowdsources funds for sustainable
payments market. Its “Ant Forest” energy and building projects. Since
platform gamifies and rewards low- its founding in 2012, investors have
emissions behaviour. More than 300 raised £73.9m in 31 projects with
million people have signed up. £11.5m paid in returns.
The demand for environmentally sustainable investments already exceeds

supply. Investors with assets worth US$24 trillion are calling for the creation
of more green financial products, according to the G20 Sustainable Finance
Synthesis report (2018).3 Renewable energy, plant-based foods, circular Big data and real estate ESG made simple
economy, vehicle-sharing, and smart buildings are all sectors that could
benefit from this opportunity, forcing legacy incumbents towards a more In the Netherlands, ING Real Estate Fintech company TruValue Labs
sustainable path. But of the world’s unicorns (private companies with a one Finance helps borrowers identify uses AI to help investors identify
energy-efficiency improvements sustainable investments. Machine
billion dollar or more valuation), few are focused on zero-carbon futures. in buildings that provide the best learning and natural language
financial returns and greatest processing (NLP) are used to
Climate finance is not just about changing capital flows away from fossil- emissions reductions. The newly- analyze data in real time to provide
developed app recommends the top insights to investors.3 A second new
fuels. Research in 2018 also highlighted the role of international capital
ten strategies per building. company, Arabesque, is a “quant”
flows in reducing the resilience of the Amazon and boreal forests, potentially asset manager that examines the
accelerating these regions towards dangerous tipping points that could A new app has scanned 18,000
sustainability of over 7000 of the
world’s largest listed companies.
accelerate climate change.4 New incentives are needed to ensure investors buildings and identified over
Its technology combines over 200
stop supporting economic activities that are undermining the resilience of US$40 million in savings through
ESG measures to rank companies.26
energy efficiency.25
these critical biomes.
400 Crossing economic tipping points

Cost Range In most parts of the world, renewables are now the cheapest source of new
Average Cost power generation.5 They have reached market maturity and outcompete
fossil-fuel incumbents on price, performance and pollution. Take solar
photovoltaic (PV) as an example of non-linear cost dynamics. Between
Estimated global levellised cost 1975 and 2016, PV prices fell 99.5%. Every doubling of installed capacity
of electricity in 2016 USD
Adapted from: IRENA 2018 came with a 20% fall in price and PV installation has grown at 38% per year
for about a decade.6 Improvements in price and performance continue
300
to defy predictions while innovations in the coal and oil industries stagnate.
In 2018, PV prices fell a further 13% on the previous year, as did onshore
wind.5 Indeed, in the electricity sector the additional cost of halving emissions
50% by 2030 is likely to be zero. In some places it is cheaper to build new
renewable installations than to keep existing fossil-fuel plants running.
The world has reached a tipping point (see figure). With the economics
200 for renewables changing rapidly, the real risk to fossil-fuel firms is the pace
at which other sectors innovate and electrify away from petroleum as well
as how quickly national grids move away from fossil-fuels. Expect the
unexpected. Fossil-fuel companies are dropping out of the top ten most
valuable companies as tech giants surge past US$1 trillion valuations.
With the right financial instruments, a very rapid economic transformation
that beats most predictions is now tenable. Bold policies can accelerate the
100 FOSSIL FUEL transformation. Indeed, the economic benefit of a low-carbon future by 2030
POWER COST is US$26 trillion compared with staying on the current high-carbon pathway.7
RANGE But policies are sending mixed signals to markets, and the cost of these mixed
signals is potentially US$12 trillion of stranded fossil-fuel assets by 2035.7
0
2010 2017 2010 2017 2010 2017 2010 2017
Solar Solar Onshore Offshore

photovoltaics thermal wind wind
Figure 16. Cost of wind and solar power generation.

The world has crossed an economic tipping point for renewable energy. The global
weighted average cost of new renewables is now within the cost range of fossil-fuels
and still falling.5
T E N P O L I CY P R I O R I T I E S
01
Build trust and public support for carbon law compatible
financial instruments.
FOR FINANCE Public support for carbon pricing has been hampered
by poor policy design and communication coupled with
widespread misinformation by politicians opposed to
Fiscal policies in almost all countries are not aligned with the carbon law. the policy. Equitable policies that redistribute income,
Policies either do not exist or carbon pricing is too low and inconsistent. for example reducing income tax while raising carbon prices
With political will this can change rapidly because businesses, the finance such as “carbon fee and dividend”, may be more likely to
community and citizens are demanding fair and equitable fiscal policies succeed. Likewise, starting low and ratcheting carbon prices
to address climate. The immediate policy priorities needed by the end of annually is more acceptable than going in off the deep end.
2020 to redirect capital flows to support the economic transformation are:
02
Go beyond electricity generation.
Financial instruments must reach all parts of the economy,
and the biosphere. Investments beyond wind, solar and
energy storage need significant ramping up immediately
in all sectors highlights in this report. Also investments
are needed in carbon storage (forests and peatlands),
sustainable agriculture and marine resilience.
03
Price carbon.
The IPCC’s special report on 1.5°C suggests an appropriate
carbon price in 2030 would be between US$135–6050/tCO2e
to deliver the needed economic shift. There are country
differences though. A carbon tax of US$70 per tonne of CO2
in addition to existing measures could reduce emissions
more than 40% in some countries, for example India and
China, according to the UNEP Emissions Gap report.
Sweden has the world’s highest carbon price – US$139 per
tonne of CO2. Since the carbon tax introduction in 1991,
the Swedish economy grew 60% and carbon emissions fell
25%.8 Carbon pricing is spreading rapidly, and will reach 20%
of global emissions in 2020 as China implements pricing,
but it needs to accelerate rapidly in the early 2020s to all
major economies.12, 13 Nevertheless, it is important to keep
in mind that carbon price alone is not going to lead to deep
decarbonisation at a sufficient speed. In Sweden, a price
on carbon did not drive emission reductions without energy
infrastructure development, for example in transport.
04 07
Stop subsidising fossil-fuels. Demand green public procurement.
If all fossil-fuel subsidies were phased out, carbon emissions Public procurement accounts for 15–20% of global
would fall up to 10% by 2030.6 Direct fossil-fuel subsidies GDP,11 and is a major opportunity to rapidly transform
amount to around US$330-680 billion annually, and indirect investment flows to low-carbon infrastructure. In 2017,
impacts have been estimated at US$5.3 trillion annually, local governments across the globe joined forces to agree
or 6.5% of GDP.9 The G20 has recommended ending these a framework for green public procurement contracts.
subsidies by 2025. This is too late. They should be redirected This network needs to expand rapidly.
to renewables while ensuring a just transition for workers
08
exposed to job losses. emand low-carbon infrastructure projects.
D
Ensure major infrastructure investments such as China’s
05
Revolutionise agricultural subsidies. Belt and Road are aligned with the carbon law.
Agricultural subsidies are worth over US$620 billion a year
09
representing around 15% of gross farm receipts in 51 major educe risks for venture capital and private equity to
R
food-producing nations.10 Most agricultural policies are not drive low-energy demand solutions.
aligned with the urgent need for sustainable agriculture, Incentivise venture capital and private equity towards
improved diets and carbon storage. Processes are needed businesses driving energy efficiencies, circular economies
to revolutionise these subsidies within the next five years and zero-carbon innovations. Conversely, remove incentives
to turn agriculture from a source of emissions to a net sink. for investing in high-polluting innovation and integrate
climate risk into the cost of capital through assessment
06
ake climate disclosure mandatory and more transparent –
M of borrower’s emissions exposure, physical risk, stranded
including all a business’s emissions, so-called Scope 1, 2 & 3. asset risk and potential climate opportunities.
More than 800 companies and institutions overseeing
10
US$118 trillion in assets support Mark Carney’s (chair of the Expand fintech and financial innovation for a 1.5°C planet.
G20 Financial Stability Board) call for businesses to disclose The carbon law demands accelerating finance innovation.
climate risk. Carney’s Task Force on Climate-related Financial Establish many more green/sustainable fintech hubs to
Disclosure (TCFD) is now rallying companies around this accelerate innovation for a 1.5°C planet and provide the
goal, but the task force must set more ambitious targets and, policy landscape to make it easy for start-ups to thrive.
ultimately, climate disclosure should be mandatory. The next
frontier in this discussion is influencing consumer emissions
caused by a company’s products.
The carbon bubble Advocacy groups are attempting to accelerate the investment transformation
out of fossil-fuels with some success. The global divestment movement –
Recent research indicates demand for fossil-fuels has the potential to
persuading investors to divest from assets linked to fossil-fuels – has grown
drop precipitously in the near future, risking a carbon bubble up to 16 times
rapidly since its beginnings in 2011, fuelled in part by high-profile social
bigger than the bubble that led to the 2008 financial crisis. If the bubble is
media campaigns to mobilise citizens and investors. At the time of writing,
not carefully deflated now, this could lead to losses on the scale of trillions
over 1,000 organisations with assets worth US$10 trillion have committed
of dollars by 2035. China and parts of Europe importing fossil-fuels stand
to divest from fossil-fuels15. In 2018, Ireland announced plans to divest from
to benefit most from the bursting carbon bubble, while the US, Canada and
fossil-fuels – the first nation to do so. In 2019, Norway’s parliament gave its
Russia stand to lose the most – up to US$4 trillion – if climate action
US$1 trillion sovereign wealth fund the green light to dump more than US$13
is delayed.14 The fossil-fuel industry is worth around US$5 trillion.
billion in fossil-fuel stocks, a move that did not go as far as many advocacy
In 2017, 34 central banks joined forces to ensure a smooth transition to a groups had hoped.
low-carbon economy: the Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS).
Markets are heavily influenced by sentiment and divestment stigmatises
This network, including the Bank of England and the Banque de France,
companies and changes the public discourse – this affects market confidence.
represents half of global greenhouse gas emissions and the supervision of
Modelling results show that about 10% minority of environmentally conscious
two thirds of the global systemically important banks and insurers. In 2019,
investors could tip the market and lead to the bursting of the carbon bubble.16,17
it provided four recommendations for all central banks, supervisors and the
financial community to avoid a climate-driven “Minsky moment” – the term
for an abrupt collapse in asset prices:
01
I ntegrate the monitoring of climate-related financial
risks into day-to-day supervisory work, financial stability
monitoring and board risk management.
02
Lead by example, specifically central banks are
encouraged to integrate sustainability into their
own portfolio management.
Blockchain for green
03
Collaborate to bridge the data gaps to enhance the
finance
assessment of climate-related risks. Public authorities
should share and if possible make publicly available The Shenzhen Green Finance
any climate-risk data. Committee is piloting the use of
blockchain to digitize the green
certification and verification
04
Build in-house capacity and share knowledge with process.3 In France, Nespresso
has launched a blockchain-based
other stakeholders on management of climate-related
register to track climate-positive
financial risks. actions to share positive social
and environmental impacts with
shareholders.
Sustainable investment Potential ways in which fintech could help reduce emissions:24
Sustainable investments now total around US$31 trillion, according to recent
The data held by technology giants and traditional banks can be
data18 though defining a sustainable investment is tricky and these figures
used to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Artificial intelligence and
are disputed. This includes US$17.5 trillion in assets that have adopted some
machine learning can analyse consumer emissions related to spending
sort of environmental, social and governance (ESG) criteria. For comparison,
and incentivise low emissions behaviour. One example is using digital
assets controlled by financial institutions around the globe are worth US$88
applications to help individuals understand their pension investments
trillion. Mutual funds, pension funds and insurance companies own approximately
and switch to carbon law compatible options. With its 2.2 billion users,
US$30 trillion of these assets.
Facebook’s entry into fintech through its announcement to launch its own
currency, Libra, indicates the direction personal finance may begin to move
ESG funds have grown more than two thirds in two years, according to the
in the next decade with opportunities for supporting societal goals, but
Financial Times. This is one of the fastest growing asset classes.10 Evidence
major risks for privacy, security and surveillance.
suggests that ESG assets are aligned with better performance, or at least do
not reduce performance.19 For more rapid climate action we must also shift
Blockchain for trade of carbon credits, supply-chain transparency and
from ESG criteria to financial portfolios aligned with the Paris Agreement.
property rights, though, as a high-emitting technology, blockchain must
This requires greater transparency within ESG portfolios – something fintech
become more efficient.
can help enable.
ESG reporting is mired in difficulties due to a lack of standardisation.
Finally, green bonds can finance major projects related to renewable energy,
Digital technologies to mine and analyse data from multiple sources
sustainable transport, and energy-efficient buildings and construction.20
can be used to provide clarity and standardisation.
The market for green bonds is now growing rapidly, reaching US$170 billion
in 2018 and is expected to top US$250 billion in 201921. This growth needs
to double every year to reach US$1 trillion by 2021. However, green bonds Crowdfunding
currently only represent a tiny share (<0.5%) of outstanding bonds.22 We must Crowdfunding is emerging in some markets as an alternative to venture capital
now see the whole bond market align with an economic transition for a 1.5°C and private equity for financing new businesses and new business models.
planet. Moreover, we need to see investments shift away from activities that Investment in small and medium-sized businesses in emerging markets,
reduce the resilience of the Earth system, for example unsustainable (and like solar powered mini-grids in Africa, is often difficult. Lack of knowledge
often inefficient) agricultural expansion in the Amazon. and information coupled with concerns over accountability, corruption and
transparency in some regions makes investment risky. This means that
Is fintech the solution or part of the problem? access to low-cost capital is very limited.
Finance technology, or fintech, has enormous disruptive potential to
Crowdfunding, where a large number of small-scale investors gain equity
reshape the finance sector. But its value in reducing emissions remains
in the company or interest on loans, has emerged as an important bridge
underappreciated.23 From peer-to-peer money transfers to crowdfunding
to span this gap. Digital platforms mediate and provide solutions to manage
solar arrays, like Sweden’s Swish and Trine respectively, digital technologies
risk. This is now a big business, estimated to reach US$687 billion in loans
are unlocking new financial opportunities and business models. While fintech
by around 2022,15 which has begun competing directly with traditional venture
is experiencing high growth and countries are keen to establish themselves as
capital and traditional lending.
leaders in this field, green fintech hubs and resources are thin on the ground
and the companies that do exist are niche not mainstream. We were only able
to identify a single green fintech hub, based in Stockholm.
EXPONENTIAL
TECHNOLOGIES
AND SOLUTIONS
Exponential technologies and solutions are those where Moore’s Law and Exponential Technologies
performance is constantly and rapidly improving at the The original example of an exponential technology is the silicon chip –
same time as costs fall – the price/performance ratio is since the mid-1960s, the power of computer chips has doubled every couple
of years and the price has halved. This phenomenon has been dubbed
accelerating. This dynamic can have a disruptive impact Moore’s Law after Intel founder Gordon Moore and this development has
on industries used to incremental change. Indeed, changed the world – delivering computers, the internet, smartphones, and
it can lead to entirely new business models. If leveraged the cloud. Today, a chip containing 30 billion transistors can rest on your
to solve societal challenges, those technologies and thumb. But this is just the beginning – other key exponential technologies,
sometimes building on these chips, include mobile telephony and broadband,
solutions can change society for the better. That is why artificial intelligence and machine learning, robotics, digital biotechnology,
they are critical to enable rapid decarbonisation. To date, nanotechnology and digital fabrication. Other examples are solar and wind
however, the impact of many exponential technologies power, battery technology and nanomaterials.
on total greenhouse gas emissions has either been
Exponential technology and solutions often grow slowly in the beginning,
ambiguous or they have driven emissions upwards. but when they pass the inflection point where performance goes up as costs
fall, they can enter a virtuous cycle leading to rapid adoption and expansion.
For decades, exponential development in the digital industry has been Naturally, humans tend to overestimate the growth of these technologies
the primary business model. The sector is used to unceasing rapid change. in the short term but underestimate them in the long term.
In the next decade, this pace of change needs to be adopted by other sectors,
and supported by policies, in order to enable the speed and scaling required The digital technology industry has grown to become the most valued
to avoid the most severe consequences of climate change. and powerful in the world. But with great power comes great responsibility,
and this industry will influence how far global temperatures will rise.
This chapter will discuss the role that exponential technologies in general and The digital sector is already well on track to reduce its own emissions,
the digital industries in particular will play in shaping the future of our planet. which represent 1.4% of the global total,1 and it can contribute significantly
to cutting emissions in half across all sectors by 2030 while driving
exponential performance growth. But digital technology also guides the
behaviour of four billion people daily and drives the modern economy,
which provides a unique opportunity to influence decisions and behaviours.
In the critical next decade, the digital revolution is expected to disrupt and
transform transportation, buildings, industry, energy, farming, retail, food
and finance and can help to substantially reduce these sectors’ emissions.2
Through these opportunities, digitalisation is the key to halving emissions by
2030 – it can directly enable around a third of the emissions cuts necessary2
and influences the rest.
Innovations are scaling faster Key technologies for climate mitigation

While it took telephony 75 years to reach 50 million users, it took the internet Halving emissions by 2030 will be enabled by scaling technologies at
seven years, and Pokémon Go just 19 days.3 Mobile internet is constructed so different levels of development. The International Energy Agency highlights
that new innovations can utilise underlying technology platforms which have 45 technology areas which are specifically important for climate mitigation
taken decades and billions of dollars to develop. It is no surprise that a vast (4x). Key technologies such as solar photovoltaics, wind energy, LED lighting,
majority of start-ups worth over US$1 billion are digital. energy storage, electric vehicles, datacentres and bioenergy are growing fast
and following exponential trajectories. Others, however, are not. Heating and
Search engines, e-commerce, social media platforms and smartphones all cooling technologies for buildings, smart grids, concentrated solar power,
enable new, unexpected innovations. It would have been impossible to predict geothermal energy and low-carbon materials must all scale faster.4
that Google’s investments in mapping would lead to Uber, for example,
or that the iPhone would birth Twitter, but neither technology would be Furthermore, mature digital technologies such as mobile internet, cloud
possible without its progenitor. Smaller, granular technologies like mobile computing, big data, apps, smart devices and first-generation industrial
phones, cars or solar power, can diffuse globally much faster than big automation are a foundation for efficiency gains in all industries. The next
infrastructure like nuclear plants – and internet-based services can scale digital technologies down the ramp are artificial intelligence, 5G networks,
incredibly fast. digital fabrication, large-scale deployment of the internet of things, blockchain
and drones. These may enable significant emissions cuts before 2030.5
Exponential technologies often enable disruption and transformation of Other notable technologies include immersive user experiences like virtual
industries through new business models with the potential to be far more and augmented reality, 3D printing, gene editing, advanced robotics,
efficient than the previous ones, driven by digitalisation. Some key examples and digital assistants. At this stage it is impossible to quantify their potential
are Spotify in music, Uber in taxis, WeWork in business space and Airbnb in impact on emissions.
home rental. The effect of these companies entering the scene is that the
incumbent companies must transform or perish, which tends to trigger a Ultimately, the trillions of consumer and business decisions made each
transformation of the entire industry. Tesla’s impact on the car industry, year will determine whether we end up in a 1.5°C world or a 3°C world –
which is now accelerating electrification of vehicles, is a good example. and technology can influence those decisions while still allowing freedom
of choice. For example – hidden algorithms are integral to e-commerce:
Disruption and transformation are essential to achieve rapid climate mitigation they determine what consumers see and how they navigate websites.
– the world needs rapid innovation cycles to break free of old fossil-fuel These algorithms could be programmed to prioritise products with a small
pathways, but without a compass direction, innovation could as easily drive carbon footprint in addition to merely those with a high profit margin.
up emissions. Uber and Lyft, for example, have claimed they can make cities Software used to design buildings could use sustainable materials as
better places to live by reducing the need for car ownership and so reducing the default building material. Even actively displaying the carbon footprint
congestion. However, in some cities where these services are popular they of a product at the point of sale can make a substantial difference.
contribute to congestion. In the long run, if they encourage people away
from mass transportation systems, they may push emissions even higher. Finally, there are increasing calls for greater governance over technology
companies. As countries commit to zero-emissions by 2050, new models
to achieve these goals could explore regulation of the use of technology
that accelerates global warming.
Table 2: Examples of digital technologies which can help limit global warming or accelerate global warming and how.
Key digital How they risk accelerating global

What does it mean How they can help limit global warming to 1.5°C
technologies warming towards 4°C
Social media Interactive technologies that Support democracy. Spread misinformation eg climate
facilitate the creation and denial. Undermine democratic
Promote fact-based worldviews.
sharing of information via processes. Encourage unsustainable
networks while collecting Tackle misinformation. consumption.
personal data for behavioural
insights. Utilise behavioural insights to enable sustainable lifestyles.
Enable global climate movements.
Help displace the need for physical travel.
E-commerce Buying or selling of products Support a shift to sustainable, low-carbon products and services through Simplify high-carbon consumption
and services over the internet. information and nudging. through low prices, fast delivery and heavy
promotion, leading to increased waste of
material, energy and transportation.
Internet Connecting devices and Optimise any type of system to save energy, materials and to enable a Increase efficiency of oil and gas
of Things everyday objects to each other circular economy. extraction and production of high-
and online services. carbon products thereby delaying the
Enable distributed demand response to help balance electricity grids.
shift to low-carbon alternatives.
AI, machine and The ability of a machine or Continuous improvement of energy systems, factories, buildings and Accelerate high-carbon consumption,
deep learning computer programme to think vehicles. Drive down costs and carbon footprint, while improving long-distance travel and goods
and learn. performance and functionality. transportation through biased
algorithms and profiled online
Linking with social media and other technologies, it can also help people
advertising.
to understand their footprint and nudge them in a sustainable direction.
5G mobile 5th generation cellular network Mass scale, global connection of electric grids, buildings, industries, Enable acceleration of high-carbon
networks technology providing higher cities, vehicles and things combined with AI and machine learning enable intense industries and digital platforms
speed connectivity to people, efficiency of systems. Virtual meetings and virtual and augmented reality which drives high-carbon consumption.
enterprises and objects. reduces need for travelling. Resource-efficient manufacturing flows and
autonomous services brings down use of resources.
Blockchain An open distributed ledger that Allows greater transparency throughout the value chain of goods and Current cryptocurrencies using
can record transactions between services making it easier to drive decarbonisation. Enable distributed blockchain technologies have a high
two parties efficiently and in a coordinating of physical energy flows and financial flows. energy demand – currently equivalent
verifiable and permanent way. to a small developed country.
Digital twin A digital replica of a living Allows designers and engineers to test and simulate how systems Can be deployed to accelerate fossil-
or non-living physical system. such as cities and grids can be improved, optimised and transformed. based high-carbon systems.
*These lists are not mutually exclusive

KEY EXPONENTIAL
03
Transport
The future of transport is not cars, it is data. The 2020s
T E C H N O LO GY ST R AT E G I E S look set to see the biggest disruption of the automobile
industry since Henry Ford unveiled the Model T in 1908.
TO H E L P H A LV E CA R B O N Two seismic shifts are on their way – first, electric cars
already compete favourably with petrol engines on range
E M I S S I O N S BY 2 0 3 0 and will reach an inflection point within a few years, once their
price competes favourably. Most major car manufacturers
Exponential technologies can help dramatically reduce energy, material have set end dates for production of internal combustion
and waste, including food waste, while supporting global health, sustainability engines, but the change may come even sooner through
and economic goals.6,7,8,9 They are instrumental to enable a rapid reduction of usership models – service-based business models which
both production- and consumption-related emissions. maximise vehicle occupancy and use while minimising travel
costs, congestion, and pollution.
Second, a rapid shift away from privately owned vehicles
01
Energy may be close. Only 5% of cars are in use at any one time and
Four exponential technologies working in tandem will 70% of car seats are estimated to go empty.10,11 Usership
enable renewable energy; solar, wind, storage and smart models can help tap this unused value, dramatically reducing
grid technology for balancing and predictions. By enabling cost and emissions.12 AI can also help bundle together
and accelerating renewable energy investments in buildings shipments and schedule routes to minimise emissions from
and industries at block and city level, incumbent energy transportation. Driverless vehicles will shift the traditional
companies will be forced to accelerate renewable investments business model of vehicle ownership towards mobility and
to survive and a virtuous circle of change towards renewable transportation as a service. This means fewer people will
energy can be achieved. Decentralisation of energy may also own a car, instead ordering shared rides from driverless
play a disruptive role in the energy transition. electric vehicles or catching a driverless bus. But there
are risks: ride sharing can take travellers away from more
02
Buildings efficient mass transit systems.
Most buildings are inefficiently heated, cooled, ventilated
and lit. Digitalisation can help drive down energy waste Next generation immersive, virtual meetings and conferencing
by adjusting to occupancy and need and help double or also has the potential to replace many business trips, saving
quadruple space utilisation through new sharing business cost, time, and carbon emissions.
models, while simultaneously improving productivity and
reducing costs.
04 07
Manufacturing and materials Cities and infrastructure
Almost everything is designed with computer software, The need for more roads and physical infrastructure can
from buildings to mobile phones to consumer packaging. be dramatically reduced by optimising existing physical
Using AI to design products for re-purpose, sharing, reuse infrastructure instead of investing in new buildings and roads.
and recycling can become the new default. High-precision Using digital technology to connect, model and measure
manufacturing through 5G and other technologies can also cities, and making this information accessible to all, makes it
save materials and energy usage in manufacturing and there possible to visualise what a healthy and fossil-free city looks
is also a potential for distributed manufacturing to reduce like. This enables the creation of a common vision for an
distances of product supply chains. environment- and user-oriented innovation, involving citizens
and various stakeholders in accelerating a sustainable
Reverse logistics and real-time tracing of material, transformation.
components and products will make it possible to increase
08
utilisation rates of consumer goods, vehicles, and physical Sustainable consumption
infrastructure and also to adopt sharing-economy and More and more consumers want to make sustainable
circular business models and cut huge amounts of material decisions. A wide range of carbon calculators and
waste. Also, AI can be applied to rapidly develop the next applications make it possible for people to calculate their
generation of low-carbon materials.13 own carbon footprint and some even suggest how start
shift consumption in a sustainable direction
05
Food
Innovative, plant-based food companies focusing on But a bigger opportunity will come from pushing low-carbon
sustainability and health, such as Oatly14 and Impossible choices in mainstream e-commerce sites and using digital
Foods,15 are growing rapidly. Revolutions in choice assistants to shift consumption and investment decisions,
architecture and transparency of climate and planetary including pension choices, in a sustainable direction.
impact could support positive diet choices, reduce meat Algorithms and information architecture can be designed to
consumption and slash greenhouse gas emissions as a nudge consumer behaviour towards low-carbon choices,
result. In parallel, using AI for better prediction of supply for example by making those options the default.
and demand can reduce waste in the supply chain.
Half of global advertising revenue will soon be online, and
06
Forests and agriculture largely streaming towards just a small handful of companies.
Digital technology makes it possible to track and predict These companies could make a huge difference by limiting
deforestation in order to take proactive action. It can also advertising of high-emissions products such as cheap flights
boost reforestation and protect peat marshes. It can help and promoting sustainable, low-carbon choices and
farmers to transform to regenerative agriculture which is healthy lifestyles.
positive for the planet, predicting which crops to plant
and when, and reward farmers for emissions cuts.
Flexible work space
Society could naturally demand technology companies to contribute WeWork is present in 100 cities,
offering co-working space and
wherever possible to emission reductions and to enable sustainable services for small businesses.
transformation as part of a social contract.
WeWork claims to be 2.5-4x
more efficient with space than
Technology companies can become genuine climate leaders by integrating a traditional office.
climate action in everything from their value propositions and mission
statements to daily decisions which ensure that their solutions and products
support a 1.5°C future. The world will come closer to this goal by:
Shifting digital industry resources towards the energy and material Einride
revolution and the circular economy in energy, buildings, industry, Einride’s solution is based on
transportation, cities and agriculture. autonomous, all-electric vehicles,
coordinated by an intelligent routing
software to optimize battery life and
Incentivising usership business models rather than ownership, improving energy consumption.
the rate of use of products and services, and rethinking business models Road transportation is responsible for
with sustainability in mind. approx. 20% of global CO2 emissions.
Committing to use technology for the good of society, promising to make

low-carbon the default, rewarding low-carbon lifestyles among consumers,
and promoting fact-based worldviews.
Control buildings with
Stepping up investment in digital solutions, value-chain transparency artificial intelligence
and solutions which enable and encourage consumers, businesses The AI-based “BEAD” system
analyses and optimises a building’s
and investors to make climate-smart decisions. energy management by measuring
real-time data.
Avoiding actions which accelerate global warming such as
It could reduce annual CO2e
fossil extraction. emissions by 319 Mt CO2e by 2030.
“It always seems
impossible until it’s done”
Nelson Mandela
F I N A L WO R D S
Slow policy progress over 30 years means that Ten years ago a global goal to reach net zero emissions by 2050 seemed
politically unlikely. Now, the latest science clearly shows this goal is necessary,
incremental decarbonisation is no longer an option. achievable and desirable – a 1.5°C planet will provide the greatest good for
Only decisive and rapid action can reduce the risk the most people. And countries are starting to adopt goals and legislation
of catastrophic climate change, and simultaneously more closely aligned with this science. Halving emissions every decade using
improve the quality of life for millions of people. Without proven measures across society and the economy can deliver on this goal.
Achieving it will substantially reduce risks of catastrophic climatic impacts,
decisive action to drive the fastest and fairest economic but not eliminate these risks entirely. The technologies and solutions needed
transition in history, this generation of leaders is handing to cut emissions rapidly are available, can scale quickly and are affordable.
the next generation an increasingly destabilised climate They must be accelerated by strong policy, climate leadership, exponential
and Earth system. Indeed, decisions made today about technology and finance. The economic transition will bring significant benefits
from reduced pollution to improved health and economic growth. Indeed, the
infrastructure investments in energy systems, roads, transformation is the biggest economic opportunity of this generation.
railways, ships, aircraft and buildings will influence
whether global warming can be stabilised around Reaching the 2050 goal of net zero emissions globally will help ensure
1.5°C or not this century. the continuation of the conditions that have allowed human civilisation
to flourish over the past 10,000 years. This is every child’s birthright.
REFERENCES
ABOUT THIS REPORT MEETING THE 1.5°C CLIMATE AMBITION 11. IPBES. Summary for policymakers of the global assessment
1. J. Rockström et al., A roadmap for rapid decarbonisation. 1. IPCC. Summary for Policymakers. In: Global Warming report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the
Science 355.6331, 1269-1271 (2017). of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity
global warming of 1.5°C above pre- industrial levels and and Ecosystem Services. IPBES secretariat, Bonn,
2. IPCC. Summary for Policymakers. In: Global Warming
related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in Germany. (2019).
of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of
global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and the context of strengthening the global response to the 12. T. Hughes, et al., Global warming transforms coral reef
related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in threat of climate change, sustainable development, and assemblages. Nature 556.7702 492 (2018).
the context of strengthening the global response to the efforts to eradicate poverty. Geneva, Switzerland: World 13. Amazônia Legal Brasileira – alertas de Desmatamento.
threat of climate change, sustainable development, and Meteorological Organization, IPCC (2018). Terrabrasilis.dpi.inpe.br, (available at: http://terrabrasilis
efforts to eradicate poverty. Geneva, Switzerland: World 2. J. Rockström, et al., A roadmap for rapid decarbonisation. .dpi.inpe.br/app/dashboard/alerts/legal/amazon/aggrega
Meteorological Organization, IPCC (2018). Science 355.6331, 1269-1271 (2017). ted/#) (2019).
3. IPCC. Climate Change and Land: an IPCC special report 3. J. Falk, O. Gaffney, et al. Exponential Climate Action 14. New Climate Economy. The Global Commission on the
on climate change, desertification, land degradation, Roadmap. Future Earth. (2018). Economy and Climate. (available at: https://newclimateeco
sustainable land management, food security, and 4. C. Le Quéré, Global Carbon Budget 2018. Earth Syst. Sci. nomy.report/2018/) (2018).
greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems. (2019). Data, 10, 2141-2194 (2018). 15. D. Carrington, ‘Do it now’: UK must set zero-carbon target
4. W. Willett et al., Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT Lancet 5. IRENA: Renewables now the lowest-cost power source in for 2050, say official advisers. The Guardian (2019).
Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food most of the world – Institute for Energy Economics and (available at: https://www.theguardian.com/environment
systems. Lancet 2019; 393: 447–92. (2019). Financial Analysis. Institute for Energy Economics and /2019/may/02/do-it-now-uk-must-set-zero-carbon-tar
5. A. Grubler et al., A low energy demand scenario for meeting Financial Analysis, (available at: http://ieefa.org/irena-rene get-for-2050-say-official-advisers) (2019).
the 1.5 °C target and sustainable development goals wables-now-the-lowest-cost-power-source-in-most-of 16. J. F. Mercure, Macroeconomic impact of stranded fossil-
without negative emission technologies. Nature Energy 3, -the-world/) (2019). fuel assets Nature Climate Change volume 8, pages
515–527 (2018). 6. UNFCCC. Country Pledges Still Long Way from Meeting 588–593 (2018).
6. P. Hawkin, Drawdown: The Most Comprehensive Plan Ever Paris Goals – Latest UNEP Emission Gap Report Urges 17. D. Tong, et al., Committed emissions from existing energy
Proposed to Reverse Global Warming. Penguin Books, New Faster Action, (Available at: https://unfccc.int/news/count infrastructure jeopardize 1.5°C climate target. Nature. (2019).
York (2017). ry-pledges-still-long-way-from-meeting-paris-goals-la 18. J C. Minx, et al., Negative emissions: Part 1—Research
7. The Finnish Innovation Fund Sitra. Material Economics. test-unep-emission-gap-report-urges-faster) (2017). landscape, ethics, and synthesis. Environmental Research
Industrial Transformations 2050. (available at: 7. The CAT Thermometer Climate Action Tracker. (available at: Letters. 13(6) (2018).
https://media.sitra.fi/2019/05/30150529/industrial-trans https://climateactiontracker.org/global/cat-thermome 19. UNEP. The Emissions Gap Report 2018. United Nations
formation-2050.pdf) (2019). ter/) (2019). Environment Programme, Nairobi. (2018).
8. Mission Innovation – Solutions Framework. 8. W. Steffen, et al.,Trajectories of the Earth System in the 20. S. J. Davis, et al., Net-zero emissions energy systems.
Misolutionframework .net (available at: https://www.misolu Anthropocene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 360.6396 (2018).
tionframework.net/) (2019). Sciences 115.33, 8252-8259 (2018)
21. World Resources Institute. Turning Point: Which Countries’
9. BW. Griscom et al., Natural climate solutions. Proceedings of the 9. H. Fischer, et al., Palaeoclimate constraints on the impact GHG Emissions Have Peaked? Which Will in the Future?
National Academy of Sciences 114.44. 11645-11650. (2017). of 2 C anthropogenic warming and beyond. Nature (available at: www.wri.org/blog/2017/11/turning-point-wh
10. JGJ. Olivier, JAHW. Peters, Trends in global CO2 and total geoscience 11.7, 474 (2018). ich-countries-ghg-emissions-have-peaked-which-will-fu
greenhouse gas emissions: 2018 report. PBL Netherlands 10. D. Carrington, ‘Climate apartheid’: UN expert says human ture) (2017).
Environmental Assessment Agency, The Hague. (2018). rights may not survive. The Guardian (available at: https:// 22. C. Le Quéré, et al., Drivers of declining CO2 emissions in 18
11. J. Gütschow et al., The PRIMAP-hist national historical emissions www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/jun/25/clima developed economies. Nature Climate Change 9.3, 213 (2019).
time series (1850-2016). v2.0. GFZ Data Services (2019). te-apartheid-united-nations-expert-says-human-rights
23. A. Grubler, et al., A Low Energy Demand Scenario for
-may-not-survive-crisis) (2019).
12. The Climate Access Indicators Tool. World Resource Meeting the 1.5°C Target and Sustainable Development
Institute. (available at: https://www.wri.org/our-work/proje Goals without Negative Emission Technologies. Nature
ct/cait-climate-data-explorer) (2019). Energy 3: 515-527 (2018).
24. J. Watts, ‘Biggest compliment yet’: Greta Thunberg 6. P. Landrigan et al., The Lancet Commission on Pollution and INDUSTRY
welcomes oil chief’s ‘greatest threat’ label. The Guardian Health. The Lancet Commissions 391, 462-512 (2018). 1. H. Kharas, The emerging middle class in developing
(available at: https://www.theguardian.com/environment 7. Y. Deng et al., Quantifying a realistic, worldwide wind and countries: An Update. (2017).
/2019/jul/05/biggest-compliment-yet-greta-thunberg solar electricity supply. Global Environmental Change 31,
-welcomes-oil-chiefs-greatest-threat-label) (2019). 2. United Nations. Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
239-252 (2015). The World’s Cities in 2016. Data booklet. (2016).
25. D. F. Lawson, et al., Children can foster climate change 8. International Renewable Energy Agency. Capacity
concern among their parents. Nature Climate Change 9.6 3. M. Fischedick et al., Industry. In: Climate Change
and Generation, Statistics Time Series. (available at: 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of
458 (2019). http://resourceirena.irena.org/gateway/dashboard/) (2018). Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the
26. Pew Research Center, Climate Change Still Seen as the Top 9. International Renewable Energy Agency. Capacity and Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Edenhofer,
Global Threat, but Cyberattacks a Rising Concern. (2019). Generation, Statistics Time Series. (available at: http://reso O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner,
27. REN21, Renewables in Cities 2019 Global Status Report – urceirena.irena.org/gateway/dashboard/?topic=4&subTo K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B.
Preliminary Findings. Paris: REN21 Secretariat (2019). pic=16) (2018). Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow,T.
28. WBGU – German Advisory Council on Global Change. 10. International Renewable Energy Agency. Cost. LCOE 2010- Zwickel and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press,
Towards our Common Digital Future. Berlin, WBGU 2016. (available at: http://resourceirena.irena.org/gateway Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA. (2014).
(available at: https://www.wbgu.de/en/publications/publi /dashboard/?topic=3&subTopic=1057) (2018). 4. Center for International Environmental Law. Plastic &
cation/towards-our-common-digital-future) (2019). 11. T. Kåberger, Progress of renewable electricity replacing Climate: The Hidden Costs of a Plastic Planet. (available at:
29. TWI2050 – The World in 2050. The Digital Revolution and fossil-fuels. Global Energy Interconnection, Vol1, No 1,pp https://www.ciel.org/plasticandclimate/) (2019).
Sustainable Development: Opportunities and Challenges. 48-52, (2018). 5. PA. Enkvist, P. Klevnas, The Circular Economy–A Powerful
Report prepared by the World in 2050 initiative. Laxenburg, 12. International Energy Agency. The Future of Hydrogen. Force for Climate Mitigation: Transformative Innovation for
Austria: IIASA. (2019). Seizing today´s opportunities. (available at: Prosperous and Low-Carbon Industry. Material Economics
30. P. Cerwall, et al., Ericsson mobility report. On the Pulse of https://www.iea.org/hydrogen2019) (2019). Sverige AB: Stockholm, Sweden (2018).
the Networked Society. Hg. v. Ericsson (2015). 13. P. Hawkin, Drawdown: The Most Comprehensive Plan Ever 6. Material Economics. Industrial Transformation 2050
31. Mission Innovation – Solutions Framework Proposed to Reverse Global Warming. Penguin Books, New Pathways to Net-Zero Emissions from EU Heavy Industry.
Misolutionframework.net, (available at: York (2017). (available at: https://materialeconomics.com/latest-upda
https://www.misolutionframework.net/) (2019). tes/industrial-transformation-2050) (2019).
14. Bloomberg NEF. Global Storage Market to Double Six Times
by 2030. (available at: https://about.bnef.com/blog/global 7. Material Economics. The Circular Economy a Powerful
ENERGY SUPPLY -storage-market-double-six-times-2030/) (2018). Force for Climate Mitigation Transformative innovation for
1. International Energy Agency. CO2 emissions from fuel prosperous and low-carbon industry. (available at: https://
15. RE100. The world’s most influential companies, committed
combustion. Highlights 2017. IEA Publication (2017). media.sitra.fi/2018/06/12132041/the-circular-economy
to 100% renewable power. (available at: http://there100
-a-powerful-force-for-climate-mitigation.pdf) (2018).
2. British Petroleum. BP Statistical Review of World Energy .org/re100) (2019).
2018. BP Publication, (2018). 8. P. Hawkin, Drawdown: The Most Comprehensive Plan Ever
16. S. Maestre-Andrés et al., Perceived fairness and public
Proposed to Reverse Global Warming. (Penguin Books,
3. A. Grubler et al., A Low Energy Demand Scenario for acceptability of carbon pricing: a review of the literature.
New York, 2017).
Meeting the 1.5°C Target and Sustainable Development Climate Policy 19.9. 1186-1204 (2019).
Goals without Negative Emission Technologies. Nature 9. M. Hurwitz et al., Early action on HFCs mitigates future
17. Bloomberg NEF. New Energy Outlook 2018. Bloomberg
Energy 3: 515-527 (2018). atmospheric change. Environmental Research Letters.
Publications (2018).
11(11):114019 (2016).
4. The World Bank. Tracking SDG7: The Energy Progress 18. F. Creutzig et al., The underestimated potential of solar
Report, The World Bank Publication, (2018). 10. RE100. Companies. (available at: http://there100.org/com
energy to mitigate climate change. Nature Energy 2.9
panies) (2019).
5. J. Lelieveld et al., The contribution of outdoor air pollution 17140 (2017).
sources to premature mortality on a global scale. Nature 11. UNFCCC. About the Fashion Industry Charter Climate Action.
19. L. Reichenberg et al., The marginal system LCOE of variable
525, 367–371 (2015). (available at: https://unfccc.int/climate-action/sectoral-en
renewables – Evaluating high penetration levels of wind and
gagement/global-climate-action-in-fashion/about-the-fas
solar in Europe. Energy 152 914-924 (2018).
hion-industry-charter-for-climate-action) (2019).
12. Fossilfritt Sverige. Roadmaps for Fossil Free TRANSPORT 13. Climate Group, EV100 (available at: https://www.theclimat
Competitiveness. (available at: http://fossilfritt-sverige.se 1. S.J. Davis, et al. Net-zero emissions energy systems. egroup.org/news/business-driving-demand-electric-ve
/in-english/roadmaps-for-fossil-free-competitiveness/) Science 360.6396 (2018). hicles) (2019).
(2019). 14. COP24, Katowice Partnership for e-mobility (available at:
2. German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and
13. European Commission. Circular Economy: Commission Development, Sustainable Urban Transport: Avoid-Shift- https://cop24.gov.pl/news/news-details/news/prime
welcomes Council final adoption of new rules on single-use Improve (A-S-I). (available at: https://sutp.org/files/conten -minister-announced-e-mobility-declaration/) (2019).
plastics to reduce marine plastic litter (available at: https:// ts/documents/resources/L_iNUA/ASI_TUMI_SUTP_iNUA 15. A. Gullberg, Using platform logics in the creative destruction
europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-19-2631_en.htm) _April%202019.pdf) (2019). of urban transport – a transitional path to sustainability
(2019). (available at: https://www.sams.kth.se/polopoly_fs/1.81
3. P. Barter, Cars are parked 95% of the time.Let’s check!
14. K. Hao, Here are 10 ways AI could help fight climate change. Reinventing Parking. (available at: https://www.reinventing 9641!/Gullberg%20A%20Using%20platform%20logics
MIT Technology Review. (available at: https://www.techno parking.org/2013/02/cars-are-parked-95-of-time-lets %20in%20the%20creative%20destruction%20of%20ur
logyreview.com/s/613838/ai-climate-change-machine-le -check.html) (2019). ban%20transport.pdf) (2017).
arning/) (2019). 16. F. Sprei, Disrupting mobility. Energy Research & Social
4. A. Laine, Mobility as a Service and Greener Transportation
Systems in a Nordic context. Nordic Council of Ministers. Science. Elsevier, Volume 37. Pages 238-242. (2018).
DIGITAL INDUSTRY
(available at: http://norden.diva-portal.org/smash/get/di 17. Network for Transport Measures. Air cargo transport
1. J. Malmodin, D. Lundén, The Energy and Carbon Footprint va2:1267951/FULLTEXT01.pdf) (2018). baselines. (available at: https://www.transportmeasures
of the Global ICT and E&M Sectors 2010–2015. Journal of .org/en/wiki/evaluation-transport-suppliers/air-cargo-tr
5. CB Insights, Disrupting The Car: How Shared Cars, Bikes, &
Sustainability. (available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/su100 ansport-baselines-2017/) (2018).
Scooters Are Reshaping Transportation And Cannibalizing
93027) (2018).
Car Ownership. (available at: https://www.cbinsights.com 18. Swedish Transport Agency. Flygresandet minskade kraftigt
2. J. Malmodin, D. Lundén, The Electricity Consumption and /research/disrupting-cars-car-sharing-scooters-ebikes/) under årets första kvartal. (available at:https://www.trans
Operational Carbon Emissions of ICT Network Operators (2019). portstyrelsen.se/sv/Press/Pressmeddelanden/2019/fly
2010–2015. (available at: (http://www.diva-portal.org/sma gresandet-minskade-kraftigt-under-arets-forsta-kvar
6. Geekwire, Lime launches new LimePod car-sharing service
sh/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1177210) (2018). tal/) (2019).
to all users in Seattle (available at: https://www.geekwire
3. REN21. Renewables 2018. Global status report. Secretariat .com/2019/lime-launches-new-limepod-car-sharing-ser 19. Scania AB, The Pathways Study: Achieving fossil-free
for the 21st Century. (2018) vice-users-seattle/) (2019). commercial transport by 2050. Scania Publication (2018).
7. T. Abdallah, Sustainable Mass Transit: Challenges and 20. United Nations: Mobilizing Sustainable Transport for
BUILDINGS
Opportunities in Urban Public Transportation. Elsevier pp. Development. Analysis and Policy Recommendations
1. UNEP. The Emissions Gap Report 2017. United Nations 1-14. (2017). from the United Nations Secretary-General’s High-Level
Environment Programme, Nairobi (2017). Advisory Group on Sustainable Transport. (available at:
8. UC Davis Institute of Transportation Studies, The Benefits of
2. M. Höjer, K. Mjörnell, Measures and Steps for More Efficient Shifting to Cycling. UC Davis Publication, November (2015). https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/docum
Use of Buildings. Sustainability 10 (2018). ents/2375Mobilizing%20Sustainable%20Transport.pdf)
9. International Energy Agency, (IEA), Tracking Clean Energy
3. International Energy Agency. Energy in Buildings and (2016).
Perspectives. IEA Publication (2019).
Communities Programme. EBC Annex 56. Cost-Effective
10. International Energy Agency, (IEA), Global EV Outlook IEA, FOOD CONSUMPTION
Energy & CO2 Emissions Optimization in Building
(available at: https://www.iea.org/publications/reports/gl
Renovation. (available at: https://www.iea-ebc.org/projec 1. IPCC. Climate Change and Land: an IPCC special report
obalevoutlook2019/) (2019).
ts/project?AnnexID=56) (2017). on climate change, desertification, land degradation,
11. Wikipedia, Phase-out of fossil fuel vehicles (available at: sustainable land management, food security, and
4. International Energy Agency. Energy in Buildings and
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phase-out_of_fossil_fuel greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems. (2019).
Communities Programme. EBC Annex 57. Evaluation
_vehicles) (2019).
of embodied energy and CO2 equivalent emissions for 2. W. Willett et al., Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT Lancet
building construction. (available at: https://www.iea-ebc 12. C40, Fossil Fuel Free Streets Declaration (available at: Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food
.org/projects/project?AnnexID=57) (2016). https://www.c40.org/other/fossil-fuel-free-streets-dec systems. Lancet 2019; 393: 447–92. (2019).
laration) (2019).
3. D. Tilman et al., Future threats to biodiversity and pathways 16. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 6. T. Gasser, Negative emissions physically needed to keep
to their prevention. Nature 2017; 546: 73–81. (2017). Key facts on food loss and waste you should know! global warming below 2 C. Nature communications 2015; 6:
4. Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN. International (available at: http://www.fao.org/save-food/resources/ 7958. (2015).
Fund for Agricultural Development, UNICEF, World Food keyfindings/en/) (2019). 7. IPCC. Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on
Programme, WHO. The state of food security and nutrition 17. High Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition. the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial
in the world. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of Investing in smallholder agriculture for food security. A levels and related global greenhouse gas emission
the UN (2018). report by the High Level Panel of Experts on Food Security pathways, in the context of strengthening the global
5. WHO. Global Health Observatory (GHO) data: overweight and Nutrition of the Committee on World Food Security. response to the threat of climate change, sustainable
and obesity. 2018. (available at: http://www.who.int/gho Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN, (2013). development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. Geneva,
/ncd/risk_factors/overweight_text/en/) (2019). 18. Committee on World Food Security. Food losses and waste Switzerland:World Meteorological Organization, IPPC
in the context of sustainable food systems. A report by the Chapter 4-28 (2018).
6. D. Tilman, M. Clark, Global diets link environmental
sustainability and human health. Nature 515, p.518. (2014). High Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition 8. D. van Vuuren et al., Alternative pathways to the 1.5 °C
of the Committee on World Food Security. Rome: Food and target reduce the need for negative emission technologies.
7. J. Poore, T. Nemecek, Reducing food’s environmental
Agriculture Organization of the UN, (2014). Nat. Clim. Change 8, 391–397 (2018).
impacts through producers and consumers. Science 360
987-992. (2018). 19. P. Hawken, Drawdown: The most comprehensive plan ever 9. R. Lal et al., The carbon sequestration potential of terrestrial
proposed to reverse global warming. Penguin; (2017). ecosystems. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
8. M. Springmann et al., Analysis and valuation of the health
20. C40. (available at: https://www.c40.org/) (2019). 73(6):145A-152A. (2018).
and climate change cobenefits of dietary change. Proc Natl
Acad Sci USA 2016; 113: 4146–51. (2016). 21. World Economic Forum. Innovation with a Purpose: The 10. Carbon Brief. Analysis: How ‘natural climate solutions’ can
role of technology innovation in accelerating food systems reduce the need for BECCS. (available at: https://www.car
9. HC. Godfray et al., Meat consumption, health, and the
transformation. (2018). bonbrief.org/analysis-how-natural-climate-solutions-can
environment. Science. 20;361(6399):eaam5324. (2018).
-reduce-the-need-for-beccs) (2019).
10. Global Panel on Agriculture and Food Systems for Nutrition. 22. WHO. Taxes on sugary drinks: Why do it? (available at:
https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/260253 11. Global Forest Watch. The world lost a Beligium-sized area
Food systems and diets: facing the challenges of the 21st
/1/WHO-NMH-PND-16.5Rev.1-eng.pdf) (2019). of primary rainforests last year. (available at: https://blog.gl
century. London: Global Panel, (2016).
obalforestwatch.org/data-and-research/world-lost-belgi
11. International Food Policy Research Institute. 2017 Global um-sized-area-of-primary-rainforests-last-year) (2019).
NATURE-BASED SOLUTIONS
food policy report. Washington, DC: International Food
1. IPCC. Climate Change and Land: an IPCC special report 12. D. Gibbs et al., World Resource Institute. By the Numbers: The
Policy Research Institute, (2017).
on climate change, desertification, land degradation, Value of Tropical Forests in the Climate Change Equation.
12. E. Liem, What’s driving consumer desire for plantbased (available at: https://www.wri.org/blog/2018/10/numbers
sustainable land management, food security, and
foods. Fooddive, (available at: https://www.fooddive.com -value-tropical-forests-climate-change-equation) (2019).
greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems. (2019).
/news/whats-driving-consumer-desire-for-plantbased
2. IPCC. Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. 13. P. Hawkin, Drawdown: The Most Comprehensive Plan Ever
-foods/446183/) (2018).
Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Proposed to Reverse Global Warming. (2017).
13. Natural Resources Defense Council. Issue Paper 16- 11-B,
Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 14. Natural Climate Solutions. Nature’s sleeping giant. (available
Less Beef, Less Carbon: Americans Shrink Their Diet –
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom at: http://naturalclimatesolutions.org/) (2019).
Related Carbon Footprint by 10 Percent Between 2005 and
and New York, NY, USA. (2014). 15. H. Joosten, The Global Peatland CO2 Picture. Greifswald
2014, (available at: https://www.nrdc.org/sites/default/fi
les/less-beef-less-carbon-ip.pdf) (2017). 3. BW. Griscom et al., Natural climate solutions. Proc Natl Acad University. Wetlands International. (2016).
Sci USA 2017; 114: 11645–50. (2017). 16. Y. Wu et al., A map of global peatland distribution created
14. Mintel Group Ltd. Meat-Free Foods – UK – May 2017 market
report. (available at: https://store.mintel.com/meat-free-fo 4. W. Willett et al., Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT Lancet using machine learning for use in terrestrial ecosystem and
ods-uk-may-2017) (2017). Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food earth system models. (2017).
systems. Lancet 2019; 393: 447–92. (2019). 17. J. Xu et al., PEATMAP: Refining estimates of global peatland
15. Swedes’ meat consumption in numbers. SVT. (available at:
https://www.svt.se/nyheter/inrikes/svenskarnas-kottkon 5. J. Rogelj et al., Scenarios towards limiting global mean distribution based on a meta-analysis. Catena 160, 134-
sumtion) (2019). temperature increase below 1.5 °C. Nat. Clim. Change VOL 140 (2018).
8: 325–332, (2018).
18. A. Barthelmes et al., Peatlands and Climate in a Ramsar 7. A. Hsu et al., Who’s Acting on Climate Change? Subnational 19. O. Tynkkynen, Green to Scale: Low Carbon Success Stories
context A Nordic-Baltic Perspective. Nordic Council of and non-state global climate action. Data-Driven Yale. to Inspire the World. Sitra Publication 105 (2015).
Ministers. (2015). (available at: https://datadrivenlab.org/wp-content/uplo 20. IPCC. Summary for Policymakers. In: Global Warming
19. New York Declaration on Forests Global Platform. ads/2017/11/DDY_Taking-Stock-of-Global-Climate-Ac of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of
About the NYDF Global Platform. (available at: tion.pdf) (2017). global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and
https://nydfglobalplatform.org/about-2/) (2018). 8. C40 Cities. 27 C40 cities have peaked their greenhouse gas related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in
20. Climate Focus. Progress on the New York Declaration on emissions. (available at: https://c40-production-images.s3 the context of strengthening the global response to the
Forests: Finance for Forests – Goals 8 and 9 Assessment .amazonaws.com/other_uploads/images/1923_Peaking threat of climate change, sustainable development, and
Report. Prepared by Climate Focus in cooperation with the _emissions_Media_Pack_Extended_version.original.pdf efforts to eradicate poverty. Geneva, Switzerland: World
New York Declaration on Forest Assessment Partners with ?1536847923) (2018). Meteorological Organization, IPPC, Chapter 4, Section
support from the Climate and Land Use Alliance. (2017). 9. C40 Cities. Deadline 2020. (available at: https://www.c40 4.3.3, Table 4.2 (2018).
21. Community Research and Development Information .org/other/deadline-2020) (2019). 21. C40 Cities 2018. Consumption-based GHG Emissions of
Service. SMARTLAW Report Summary. Periodic Reporting 10. Carbon Neutral Cities Alliance. Carbon Neutral Cities. C40 Cities. (available at: https://www.c40.org/researches
for period 2 – SMARTLAW (Towards a regulatory framework (available at: https://carbonneutralcities.org/.) (2019) /consumption-based-emissions) (2018).
for climate smart agriculture). (available at: https://cordis 11. CDP. Cities A List. (available at: https://www.cdp.net/en/citi 22. Gothenburg City. Environment Agency assessment of
.europa.eu/result/rcn/198232_en.html) (2017). es/cities-scores) (2019). progress towards city sustainability goals. (Available at:
https://goteborg.se/wps/portal/start/miljo/goteborgs-to
12. Climate Emergency Declaration. (available at: https://climat
CITIES lv-miljomal/detta-kravs-for-att-na-miljomalen/!ut/p/z1
eemergencydeclaration.org/climate-emergency-declara
1. Center for International Earth Science Information Network. /04_Sj9CPykssy0xPLMnMz0vMAfIjo8ziTYzcDQy9TAy9L
tions-cover-15-million-citizens/) (2019).
Columbia University. Urban-Rural Population and Land Area XwDzQ0cfc29LQ2MPAzdvU31wwkpiAJKG-AAjgb6Bbmhi
13. WHO. COP24 Special Report Health and Climate Change. gBjUfkm/dz/d5/L2dBISEvZ0FBIS9nQSEh/#htoc-4) (2019).
Estimates Version 2. Palisades, NY: NASA Socioeconomic
(available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle
Data and Applications Center (SEDAC). (2013). 23. G. Floater, Financing the Urban Transition: Policymakers’
/10665/276405/9789241514972-eng.pdf?ua=1) (2018).
2. United Nations Habitat. Global Report on Human Summary. Coalition for Urban Transitions. London and
14. C40 Cities 2019. Cities leading the way: Seven climate Washington, DC. (available at: http://newclimateeconomy
Settlements 2011. (2011).
action plans to deliver on the Paris Agreement. (available at: .net/content/cities-working-papers) (2017).
3. D. Moran et al., Carbon footprints of 13000 cities. https://resourcecentre.c40.org/resources#cities-leading
Environmental Research Letters 13, 6 (2018). -the-way) (2019). CLIMATE LEADERSHIP
4. McKinsey Center for Business and Environment. C40 Cities, 15. McKinsey Center for Business and Environment. C40 Cities, 1. UNFCC. Country Pledges Still Long Way from Meeting Paris
Focused Acceleration: A strategic approach to climate Focussed Acceleration: A strategic approach to climate Goals – Latest UNEP Emission Gap Report Urges Faster
action in cities to 2030. McKinsey Center Publication. (2017). action in cities to 2030. McKinsey Center Publication. Action (available at: https://unfccc.int/news/country-pl
5. IPCC. Summary for Policymakers. In: Global Warming (2017). edges-still-long-way-from-meeting-paris-goals-latest
of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of 16. K. Appleby, Cities are harnessing the power of renewable -unep-emission-gap-report-urges-faster) (2017)
global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and energy: here’s how. Carbon Disclosure Project. (Available 2. California Air Resource Board. Climate Pollutants Fall Below
related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in at: https://www.cdp.net/en/articles/cities/cities-are-har 1990 Levels for First Time. (available at: https://ww2.arb.ca
the context of strengthening the global response to the nessing-the-power-of-renewable-energy) (2018). .gov/news/climate-pollutants-fall-below-1990-levels-fir
threat of climate change, sustainable development, and
17. REN21. Renewables in Cities. 2019 Global Status. st-time) (2018).
efforts to eradicate poverty. Geneva, Switzerland: World
Preliminary Findings. (available at: http://www.ren21.net/ci 3. P. McKenna, Washington Commits to 100% Clean
Meteorological Organization, IPPC Chapter 4-28 (2018).
ties/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/190605_City_Report Energy and Other States May Follow Suit (available at:
6. A. Gouldson et al., The Economic and Social Benefits of _2019_web_FINAL.pdf) (2019). https://insideclimatenews.org/news/07052019/100-per
Low-Carbon Cities: A Systematic Review of the Evidence.
18. Arup-C40. Deadline 2020: How cities will get the job done. cent-clean-energy-map-inslee-washington-california-pu
Coalition for Urban Transitions. London and Washington,
(available at: https://www.c40.org/researches/deadline erto-rico) (2019).
DC. (available at: http://newclimateeconomy.net/content
-2020) (2016).
/cities-working-papers) (2018).
4. J. Xuemei, Global rules mask the mitigation challenge facing 16. Business Ethics. Study Finds Sustainable Companies 27. Fridays For Future. Strike List Countries. (available at:
developing countries. Earth’s Future 7.4 428-432. (2019). ‘Significantly Outperform’ Financially, (Available at: http:// https://www.fridaysforfuture.org/events/list) (2019).
5. Declaration on Nordic Carbon Neutrality. (available at: business-ethics.com/2011/11/14/1503-study- finds- 28. J. Watts, Greta Thunberg, schoolgirl climate change warrior:
http://www.ym.fi/download/noname/%7B5CF4258D-82 sustainable-companies-significantly-outperform- ‘Some people can let things go. I can’t’. The Guardian.
64-4F5C-8527-081CCBBF2AE2%7D/143425) (2019). financially/) (2011). (available at: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019
6. IPCC. Climate Change: Synthesis Report. Contribution of 17. Haga initiative. Business for active climate responsibility. /mar/11/greta-thunberg-schoolgirl-climate-change-war
Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report Climate Action Profitable. A study on 300 companies rior-some-people-can-let-things-go-i-cant) (2019).
of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC, profitability and their climate efforts. (2017). 29. M. Tayor, The Extinction Rebellion scorecard: what did it
Geneva, Switzerland (2014). 18. Deloitte Insights. Leading the social enterprise: Reinvent achieve? The Guardian.(available at: https://www.theguar
7. United Nations. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, with a human focus. 2019 Deloitte Global Human Capital dian.com/environment/2019/apr/25/extinction-rebellion
Population Division. World Urbanization Prospects: The Trends. (available at: https://www2.deloitte.com/content -assessing-the-impact) (2019).
2014 Revision, ST/ESA/SER.A/366 (2015). /dam/insights/us/articles/5136_HC-Trends-2019/DI_HC 30. M. Taylor, Two-thirds of Britons agree planet is in a climate
-Trends-2019.pdf) (2019). emergency. The Guardian. (available at: https://www.thegu
8. CDP. Cities A List. (available at: https://www.cdp.net/en/citi
es/cities-scores) (2019). 19. We mean business Coalition. (available at: https://www ardian.com/environment/2019/apr/30/two-thirds-of-bri
.wemeanbusinesscoalition.org) (2019). tons-agree-planet-is-in-a-climate-emergency) (2019).
9. Carbon Neutral Cities Alliance. Carbon Neutral Cities
Alliance Members. (available at: https://carbonneutralciti 20. Science Based Targets. (available at: https://sciencebased 31. Climate Emergency Declaration. Climate emergency
es.org/cities/) (2019). targets.org) (2019). declarations in 990 jurisdictions and local governments
21. RE100. Companies. (available at: http://there100.org/com cover 212 million citizens. (available at: https://climate
10. C40 Cities. 25 Cities Commit to become Emissions Neutral
panies) (2019). emergencydeclaration.org/climate-emergency-declarati
by 2050 to Deliver on their Share of the Paris Agreement.
ons-cover-15-million-citizens/) (2019).
(available at: https://www.c40.org/press_releases/25-citi 22. Fossil Free Sweden. Roadmaps for fossil free
es-emissions-neutral-by-2050) (2019). competitiveness. (available at: http://fossilfritt-sverige.se/ 32. Welsh Government Scraps £1.4bn M4 Motorway Extension.
%20in-english/roadmaps-for-fossil-free-competitive Forbes (available at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/car
11. C40 Cities. Scores of Cities Commit to Bold Climate Action to
ness/) (2018). ltonreid/2019/06/04/citing-climate-emergency-welsh
Deliver on the Highest Ambition of Paris Agreement. (available
-government-scraps-1-4bn-m4-motorway-extension/?fb
at: https://c40-production-images.s3.amazonaws.com/pre 23. Step Up Declaration. (available at: https://stepupdecla
clid=IwAR0i0piZxtzNrknuuxOuENxWN9JbqP3-pBOEvx0
ss_releases/images/285_City_Commitments_press_relea ration.org/) (2019).
vUqE3wD78SSydYEIJBXk#73d3d77163e9) (2019).
se.original.pdf?1536936664) (2018). 24. United Nations Global Compact. Business Ambition for 1.5
33. More than half the world’s population is now middle class.
12. A. Kona et al., Covenant of mayors signatories leading °C. (available at: https://www.unglobalcompact.org/take
Financial Times (available at: https://www.ft.com/content
the way towards 1.5 degree global warming pathway. -action/events/climate-action-summit-2019/business
/e3fa475c-c2e9-11e8-95b1-d36dfef1b89a) (2019).
Sustainable Cities and Society 41:568-75. (2018). -ambition) (2019).
34. R. Wilkinson , Pickett K., The Spirit Level: Why Greater
13. This may be the single biggest business opportunity in 25. J. Poushter, C. Huang, Climate Change Still Seen as the Top
Equality Makes Societies. Bloomsbury Publishing (2011).
human history. Forbes (available at: https://www.forbes Global Threat, but Cyberattacks a Rising Concern. Pew
.com/sites/devinthorpe/2019/08/07/this-may-be-the Research Center. (available at: https://www.pewresearch 35. The Evolution of the Sustainability Mindset. Nielsen Report.
-single-biggest-business-opportunity-in-human-history/ .org/global/2019/02/10/climate-change-still-seen-as (available at: https://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/re
#698683cc261f) (2019). -the-top-global-threat-but-cyberattacks-a-rising-con port/2018/the-education-of-the-sustainable-mindset/)
cern/) (2019). (2018).
14. Mission Innovation. Misolutionframework.net. 1000
solutions will be presented at MI-5. (available at: https:// 26. IPCC. Summary for Policymakers. In: Global Warming 36. The Finnish Innovation Fund Sitra. 1.5-degree lifestyles.
www.misolutionframework.net/solutions/mi4/potential of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of (available at: https://www.sitra.fi/en/publications/1-5-deg
_reductions?page=2) (2019). global warming of 1.5°C above pre- industrial levels and ree-lifestyles/#hotspots-of-lifestyle-carbon-footprints)
related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in (2019).
15. Carbon Disclosure Project. CDP S&P 500 Climate Change
Report 2014. (available at: https://www.starwoodhotels the context of strengthening the global response to the 37. BeChange. The effect of BeChange. Summary. (available at:
.com/Media/PDF/Corporate/CDP-SP500-climate-report threat of climate change, sustainable development, and http://bechange.se/climate_effect_of_BeChange.html)
-2014.pdf) (2014). efforts to eradicate poverty. Geneva, Switzerland: World (2019).
Meteorological Organization, IPCC (2018).
38. ThredUp. 2019 Resale report. (available at: https://www.th POLICIES AND TARGETS 11. UNFCCC. Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs).
redup.com/resale) (2019). 1. IPCC. Summary for Policymakers. In: Global Warming of 1.5°C. (available at: https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings
39. R. Reints, The Resale Market Is Taking Over Fast Fashion, An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of /the-paris-agreement/nationally-determined-contributi
Report Says. (available at: https://fortune.com/2019/03/19 1.5°C above pre- industrial levels and related global greenhouse ons-ndcs) (2019).
/resale-clothing-economy-growth/) (2019). gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the 12. Global Subsidies Initiative. Fossil Fuel Subsidies & Climate
40. Radio Sweden. Swedes eating less meat for second year in global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable Change. (available at: https://www.iisd.org/gsi/what-we
a row. (available at: https://sverigesradio.se/sida/artikel.as development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. Geneva, -do/focus-areas/fossil-fuel-subsidies-climate-change)
px?programid=2054&artikel=7167904) (2019). Switzerland: World Meteorological Organization, IPCC (2018). (2019).
41. Grand View Research. Vegan Food Market Size Worth 2. Climate Emergency Declaration. Climate Emergency 13. Global Fossil Fuel Subsidies Remain Large An Update
US$24.06 Billion By 2025 | CAGR 9.6% (available at: https:// Declarations in 935 Jurisdictions and Local Governments Based on Country Level Estimates (available at: https://
www.grandviewresearch.com/press-release/global-ve Cover 206 Million Citizens. (available at: climateemergency www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2019/05/02/Glo
gan-food-market) (2019). declaration.org/climate-emergency-declarations-cover bal-Fossil-Fuel-Subsidies-Remain-Large-An-Update-Ba
-15-million-citizens/) (2019). sed-on-Country-Level-Estimates-46509) (2019).
42. N. Lyn Pesce. ‘Flygskam’ is the Swedish travel trend that
could shake the global airline industry. Market Watch. 3. O. Tynkkynen, Green European Journal. Tackling the Climate 14. G7 Ise-Shima Leaders’ Declaration. G7 Ise-Shima Summit,
(available at: https://www.marketwatch.com/story/flygsk Crisis is Possible – Yet We Need To Do It. (available at: https:// 26-27 May 2016. (available at: https://www.mofa.go.jp/fi
am-is-the-swedish-travel-trend-that-could-shake-the-gl www.greeneuropeanjournal.eu/tackling-the-climate-crisis les/000160266.pdf) (2016).
obal-airline-industry-2019-06-20) (2019). -is-impossible-yet-we-need-to-do-it/) (2019). 15. G20 Hamburg Action Plan. (available at: https://www.consi
43. IM. Otto et al., Shift the focus from the super-poor to the 4. Climate Action Tracker. Countries. (available at: https://cl lium.europa.eu/media/23546/2017-g20-hamburg-action
super-rich. (available at: https://www.nature.com/articles imateactiontracker.org/countries/) (2019). -plan-en.pdf) (2017).
/s41558-019-0402-3.epdf?shared_access_token=7OPeT 5. UNEP. The Emissions Gap Report 2018. United Nations 16. Friends of Fossil Fuel Subsidy Reform. About FFFSR.
83SpqkdK7TJh8Yra9RgN0jAjWel9jnR3ZoTv0NgXOyro3P Environment Programme, Nairobi. (2018). (available at: http://fffsr.org/about/) (2019).
W5-YFOp4drdu9crvYlL8Kf1-UbdyVKRxNBAuaBNpX6G8 6. Alliance for Climate Action. (available at: https://alliancesfo 17. World Bank Group. State and Trends of Carbon Pricing
ddPkQda-O8IHjl0V95DxApFTR_pOg3hux2NQH6YnjvA6Y rclimateaction.com/) (2019). 2019. Washington, DC: World Bank. License: CC BY 3.0 IGO.
2scuZx0ZAnouQyAj5-OV-vjrs6HVGzU%3D) (2019). (available at: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitst
7. Mission Innovation. Misolutionframework.net (available at:
44. K. Meyer, P. Newman. The Planetary Accounting Framework: http://mission-innovation.net) (2019). ream/handle/10986/31755/9781464814358.pdf?sequen
A Novel, Quota-Based Approach to Understanding the ce=7&isAllowed=y) (2019).
Impacts of Any Scale of Human Activity in the Context 8. J. McKinley, B. Plumer, New York to Approve One of the
World’s Most Ambitious Climate Plans. (available at: https:// 18. World Bank. Key Statistics on Regional, National and
of the Planetary Boundaries. Sustainable Earth 1 (1): 4. Subnational Carbon Pricing Initiative(s). (available at:
(available at: https://doi.org/10.1186/s42055-018-0004-3) www.nytimes.com/2019/06/18/nyregion/greenhouse-ga
ses-ny.html) (2019). https://carbonpricingdashboard.worldbank.org/) (2019).
(2018).
9. M. Nachmany, J. Setzer, Grantham Research Institute on 19. CPLC. Report of the High-Level Commission on Carbon
45. Deloitte. Deloitte research reveals a “generation disrupted”: Prices. (2017).
Growing up in a world of accelerated transformation leaves Climate Change and the Environment. Policy brief Global trends
Millennials and Gen Zs feeling unsettled about the future in climate change legislation and litigation: 2018 snapshot. 20. J. Rogelj et al., Mitigation Pathways Compatible with 1.5°C
(available at: https://www2.deloitte.com/global/en/pages (available at: https://www.cccep.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads in the Context of Sustainable Development. In: Global
/about-deloitte/press-releases/deloitte-millennial-sur /2018/04/Global-trends-in-climate-change-legislation-and Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts
vey-research-reveals-gen-z-unsettled.html) (2019). -litigation-2018-snapshot-2.pdf) (2018). of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and
10. T. Hale et al., Stepping up Climate Action at Home. How related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the
local governments, the private sector, and civil society can context of strengthening the global response to the threat
work domestically help deliver NDCs and raise ambition. of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to
(available at: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/552b eradicate poverty (available at: https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15
e32ce4b0b269a4e2ef58/t/5bd342031905f4d7d8113cb0 /chapter/chapter-2/) (2018).
/1540571654178/23+Report_Stepping+up+climate+ac
tion+at+home.pdf) (2018).
21. Green Growth Knowledge Partnership. Building Political 33. MITEGO. Framework Agreement for a Just Transition of 44. J. Kwakkel et al., Coping with the wickedness of public
Support for Carbon Pricing (available at: https://www.gre Coal Mining and Sustainable Development of the Mining policy problems: approaches for decision making under
engrowthknowledge.org/resource/building-political-sup Regions for the Period 2019-2027. Madrid, Spain: Ministerio deep uncertainty.01816001. (2016).
port-carbon-pricing) (2018). para la Transición Ecológica. (available at: https://www.mi 45. Climate View. A Global Climate Platform. (available at:
22. A. Baranzini et al., Carbon pricing in climate policy: seven teco.gob.es/es/prensa/ultimas-noticias/el-gobierno-y-el https://www.climateview.global/) (2019).
reasons, complementary instruments, and political -sector-de-la-miner%C3%ADa-del-carb%C3%B3n-fir
economy considerations. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: man-un-acuerdo-para-la-transici%C3%B3n-justa-y-el FINANCING THE TRANSITION
Climate Change 8.4 e462 (2017). -desarrollo-sostenible-de-las-comarcas-mineras/tcm:30
-483648) (2018). 1. Committee on Climate Change. Net Zero: the UK’s
23. A. Grubler et al., A low energy demand scenario for meeting contribution to stopping global warming. UK Committee on
the 1.5°C target and sustainable development goals without 34. MBIE. Just Transition: Making a Just Transition to a Low Climate Change (available at: https://www.theccc.org.uk
negative emission technologies. Nature Energy 3.6 (2018). Emissions Economy. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand /publication/net-zero-the-uks-contribution-to-stopping
Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment. (available -global-warming/) (2019).
24. American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy.
at: https://www.mbie.govt.nz/business-and-employment
Executive Summary. Change is in the air: How States Can 2. The New Climate Economy. The Sustainable Infrastructure
/economic-development/just-transition) (2018).
Harness Energy Efficiency To Strengthen The Economy Imperative. The New Climate Economy Publication
And Reduce Pollution. (available at: https://aceee.org/files 35. Scottish Government. Leading the Way to a Low- (available at: https://newclimateeconomy.report/2018/wp
/pdf/summary/e1401-summary.pdf) (2014). Carbon Future: Just Transition Commission to Advise on -content/uploads/sites/4/2014/08/NCE_2016Report.pdf)
Decarbonisation. (available at: https://news.gov.scot/news (2016).
25. M. Lazarus, Harro van Asselt, Fossil-fuel supply and climate
/leading-the-way-to-a-low-carbon-future) ( 2018).
policy: exploring the road less taken. Climatic Change 3. G20 Sustainable Finance Study Group. G20 Sustainable
150(1-2): 1-13; (2018). 36. C. Verkuijl, Untapped Ambition: Addressing Fossil Finance Synthesis Report. (available at: http://unepinquiry
Fuel Production through NDCs and LEDS. Seattle, WA: .org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/G20_Sustainable_Fi
26. P. Erickson et al., Assessing carbon lock-in. Environmental
Stockholm Environment Institute. (2019). nance_Synthesis_Report_2018.pdf) (2018).
Research Letters, 10(8). 084023. DOI:10.1088/1748-
9326/10/8/084023 (2015). 37. M. Meinshausen et al. Greenhouse-gas emission targets 4. V. Galaz et al., Finance and the Earth system – Exploring the
for limiting global warming to 2°C. Nature 458.7242 1158 links between financial actors and non-linear changes in
27. F. Green, Cutting with both arms of the scissors: the
(2009). the climate system. Global Environmental Change (available
economic and political case for restrictive supply-side
climate policies. Climatic Change 150(1-2) 73-87. (2018). 38. C. McGlade, P. Ekins. Un-burnable oil: An examination of at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs
oil resource utilisation in a decarbonised energy system. /pii/S0959378018300360) (2018).
28. T. Fæhn et al., Climate policies in a fossil-fuel producing
Energy Policy 64 102-112 (2014). 5. International Renewable Energy Agency. Renewable Power
country: demand versus supply side policies. The Energy
Journal. 38(77–102). (2017). 39. Omni. World faces ‘climate apartheid’: UN expert. (available Generation Costs in 2018. ISBN 978-92-9260-126-3.
at: https://afp.omni.se/world-faces-climate-apartheid-un (available at: https://www.irena.org/publications/2019
29. N. Watts et al., The Lancet Countdown on health and
-expert/a/wPVR9o) (2019). /May/Renewable-power-generation-costs-in-2018)
climate change: From 25 years of inaction to a global
40. European Joint Research Center. EU coal regions: (2019).
transformation for public health. The Lancet, 391(10120).
581–630. (2018). opportunities and challenges ahead (available at: https://ec 6 UNEP. The Emissions Gap Report 2018. United Nations
.europa.eu/jrc/en/news/eu-coal-regions-opportunities Environment Programme, Nairobi. (2018).
30. C. Verkuijl, Aligning fossil-fuel production with the Paris
-and-challenges-ahead) (2018). 7. New Climate Economy. Unlocking the Inclusive Growth
Agreement: Insights for the UNFCCC Talanoa Dialogue.
Seattle, WA: Stockholm Environment Institute. (2018). 41. UNFCCC. Workshop on Gender and Climate Change. Story of the 21st century. (available at: https://newclimate
(available at: https://unfccc.int/topics/gender/events-me economy.report/2018/) (2018).
31. Government of Canada. Environment and Climate Change
etings/workshops-dialogues/workshop-on-gender-and 8. F. Funke, L. Mattauch, Why is carbon pricing in some
Canada. Just transition task force. (available at: https://
-climate-change-june-2019) (2019). countries more successful than in others? Our World In
www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/news
/2018/02/just_transition_taskforce.html) (2018). 42. Project DrawDown. (available at: https://www.drawdown Data (available at: https://ourworldindata.org/carbon-pr
.org/) (2019). icing-popular) (2018).
32. B. Wehrmann, Germany’s Coal Exit Commission. Clean
Energy Wire (available at: https://www.cleanenergywire 43. Digitalization, I. E. A. Digitalization & Energy. (2017). 9. D. Coady et al., How large are global fossil-fuel subsidies?
.org/factsheets/germanys-coal-exit-commission) (2018). World development, 91:11-27., (2017).
10. Agricultural Policy Monitoring and Evaluation 2018. 24. D. Nassiry, The Role of Fintech in Unlocking Green Finance: 8. TWI2050 – The World in 2050. The Digital Revolution and
OECD (2018). Policy Insights for Developing Countries. ADBI Working Sustainable Development: Opportunities and Challenges.
11. European Commission. Growth: Internal Market, Industry, Paper 883. Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Institute. Report prepared by the World in 2050 initiative. Laxenburg,
Entrepreneurship, and SMEs, Public Procurement. (available (available at: https://www.adb.org/publications/role-finte Austria: IIASA. (2019).
at: https://ec.europa.eu/growth/single-market/public-pro ch-unlocking-green-finance) (2018). 9. A. Grubler et al., A Low Energy Demand Scenario for
curement_en) (2018). 25. F. Bayat-Renoux, Digital Technologies for Mobilizing Meeting the 1.5°C Target and Sustainable Development
12. World Bank. High-Level Commission on Carbon Prices. Sustainable Finance. Sustainable Digital Finance Alliance Goals without Negative Emission Technologies. Nature
Report of the High-Level Commission on Carbon (available at: http://unepinquiry.org/wp-content/uploads Energy 3: 515-527 (2018).
Prices.,Washington, DC: World Bank, (2017). /2018/10/Digital_Technologies_for_Mobilizing_Sustai 10. Reinventing Parking. Cars are parked 95% of the time. Let’s
nable_Finance.pdf) (2018). check! (available at: https://www.reinventingparking.org
13. World Bank. Ecofys. State and Trends of Carbon Pricing
2018. Washington, DC: World Bank, (2018). 26. G. Inderst, F. Stewart, Incorporating Environmental, /2013/02/cars-are-parked-95-of-time-lets-check.html)
Social and Governance (ESG) Factors into Fixed Income (2013).
14. JF. Mercure et al., Macroeconomic impact of stranded
Investment. (available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/pa 11. D. Fiorello et al., Mobility data across the EU 28
fossil-fuel assets. Nature Climate Change, (2018).
pers.cfm?abstract_id=3175830) (2018). member states: results from an extensive CAWI survey.
15. Divestment Database. (available at: https://docs.google
Transportation research procedia 14 1104-1113 (2016).
.com/spreadsheets/d/1AWTXvHOoB4A9rqOF4Ld8czsQ EXPONENTIAL TECHNOLOGIES AND SOLUTIONS
MdGHHjqarO9ahWCZ4UI/edit#gid=611799167) (2018). 12. OECD. International Transport Forum. Urban Mobility
1. J. Malmodin, D. Lundén, The energy and carbon footprint of System Upgrade How shared self-driving cars could
16. IM. Otto et al., Social tipping dynamics for stabilizing climate the ICT and E&M sector in Sweden 1990-2015 and beyond. change city traffic. (available at: https://www.itf-oecd.org
by 2050. In review for PNAS. (2019). ICT for Sustainability Atlantis Press (available at: https:// /sites/default/files/docs/15cpb_self-drivingcars.pdf)
17. B. Ewers et al., Divestment may burst the carbon bubble if www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/9/3027) (2016). (2019).
investors’ beliefs tip to anticipating strong future climate 2. J. Malmodin, P. Bergmark, Exploring the effect of ICT 13. D. Rolnick et al., Tackling Climate Change with Machine
policy. (preprint arxiv available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1902 solutions on GHG emissions in 2030. Proceedings of Learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.05433 (2019).
.07481) (2019). EnviroInfo and ICT for Sustainability (available at: https://
14. Oatly. (available at: https://www.oatly.com/se/) (2019).
18. R. Henderson, Europe leads the US$31tn charge on www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/ict4s-env-15/2583
sustainable investing. Financial Times (available at: https:// 6149) (2015). 15. Impossible Foods. (available at: https://impossiblefoods
www.ft.com/content/fef1a4fc-8354-11e9-b592-5fe435b .com) (2019).
3. World Economic Forum. In the race to 50 million users
57a3b) (2019). there’s one clear winner – and it might surprise you.
19. C. Sloley, Ten key points on the state of ESG investing (available at: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2018/06
today. CitywireSelector.com (available at: https://citywires /how-long-does-it-take-to-hit-50-million-users) (2018).
elector.com/news/ten-key-points-on-the-state-of-esg-in 4. International Energy Agency. Tracking Clean Energy
vesting-today/a1235337) (2019) Progress. (available at: https://www.iea.org/tcep/) (2019).
20. C. Clapp, Investing in a green future. Nature Climate 5. K. Hao, Here are 10 ways AI could help fight climate change.
Change, 8(2):96, (2018). MIT Technology Review. (available at: https://www.techno
21. Green Bonds Market 2019 – the state of the market. logyreview.com/s/613838/ai-climate-change-machine-le
(available at: www.climatebonds.net) (2019). arning/) (2019).
22. 2 degrees investing. (available at: https://2degrees-invest 6. J. Falk, O. Gaffney, 12 ways the tech sector can help save
ing.org/discussion-paper-theelephant-in-the-room/) the climate in 12 years. World Economic Forum. (available
(2019). at: https://exponentialroadmap.org/12in12/) (2019).
23. UNEP. Green Digital Finance – UNEP Environment Inquiry 7. Mission Innovation – Solutions Framework.
(available at: http://unepinquiry.org/wp-content/uploads Misolutionframework.net (available at: https://www.misolu
/2018/10/Green_Digital_Finance_Mapping_in_Switzerla tionframework.net/) (2019).
nd_and_Beyond.pdf) (2018).
CONTRIBUTORS
Reviewers predominantly contributed to reviewing Meeting the 1.5°C Climate Ambition Energy supply
specific chapters providing valuable input. Responsibility
AUTHORS AUTHORS
for the aggregate report is with the authors.
Owen Gaffney, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Erik Pihl, Future Earth, Tomas Kåberger, Chalmers University
Research, Stockholm Resilience Centre of Technology
Lead authors Johan Rockström, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact
CONTRIBUTORS AND REVIEWERS
Johan Falk, Future Earth, Stockholm Resilience Centre, Research, Stockholm Resilience Centre, Future Earth
Tabaré Currás, WWF
Internet of Planet Johan Falk, Internet of Planet, Stockholm Resilience Centre,
Future Earth João Pedro Gouveia, Project Drawdown
Owen Gaffney, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact
Research, Stockholm Resilience Centre Avit K. Bhowmik, Karlstad University Robert B. Jackson, Global Carbon Project and Stanford
University
Pernilla Bergmark, Ericsson
Data modelling Stefan Henningson, WWF
Avit K. Bhowmik, Karlstad University Mattias Höjer, KTH Royal Institute of Technology Industry
Jens Malmodin, Ericsson Robert B. Jackson, Global Carbon Project of Future Earth, AUTHORS
Stanford University Johan Falk, SRC, Future Earth, Internet of Planet
Chad Frischmann, Project Drawdown
Daniel Klingenfeld, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact
Research CONTRIBUTORS AND REVIEWERS
Brent Loken, Stockholm Resilience Centre, EAT Forum Emilia Hagberg, Skanska, Mark Griffiths, WWF, Janne Peljo,
Sitra, Oras Tynkkynen, Sitra
Nebojsa Nakicenovic, International Institute for Applied
Systems Analysis (IIASA)
Leena Srivastava, Future Earth, International Institute for
Digital industry
Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)
AUTHORS
Charlie Wilson, International Institute for Applied Systems
Dag Lundén, Telia, Jens Malmodin, Ericsson
Analysis (IIASA), Tyndall Centre for Climate Change
Research, University of East Anglia
CONTRIBUTORS AND REVIEWERS Johan Falk, SRC, Future Earth, Internet of Planet
Wendy Broadgate, Future Earth Pernilla Bergmark, Ericsson
Victor Galaz, Stockholm Resilience Centre

Mark Griffiths, WWF
Lisa Jacobson, Future Earth
Anthony Pearce, WWF
Vanessa Perez Cirera, WWF
Chris Weber, WWF
Buildings Nature-based solutions Policy and targets

AUTHORS AUTHOR AUTHOR
Mattias Höjer, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Tove Brent Loken, EAT Forum, Stockholm Resilience Centre Pernilla Bergmark, Ericsson
Malmqvist, KTH Royal Institute of Technology
CONTRIBUTORS AND REVIEWERS CONTRIBUTORS AND REVIEWERS
CONTRIBIUTORS AND REVIEWERS Owen Gaffney, PIK, SRC, Avit K. Bhowmik, Karlstad Cleo Verkuijl, SEI, Aaron Maltais, SEI, Fernanda Viano de
Anna Denell, Vasakronan, Rikard Strid, KTC, Emilia Hagberg, University, Steven Mc Greevy, FEAST project, Anna Richert, Carvalho, WWF, Mark Lutes, WWF, Mattias Höjer, KTH, Oras
Skanska WWF, Olav Kjørven, EAT Forum, Lujain Alqodmani, EAT Forum Tynkkanen, SITRA, Anthony Pearce, WWF
Transport Cities Open data for climate action

AUTHOR AUTHORS AUTHOR
Stefan Henningsson, WWF Anthony Pearce, WWF, Jennifer Lenhart, WWF Tomer Shalit, ClimateView
CONTRIBUTORS AND REVIEWERS CONTRIBUTORS AND REVIEWERS
Anna Kramers, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Anders Olga Kordas, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Financing the transition
Gullberg, Urban City, Mark Lutes, WWF, Jesper Johansson, Josefin Wangel, Swedish University of Agricultural AUTHORS
Transformo, Ola Hansen, WWF, Sophie Plitt, Future Earth, Sciences, Ryan Allard, Project Drawdown, João Pedro Owen Gaffney, PIK, SRC, Ilona Otto, PIK, Daniel Klingenfeld,
Andreas Foller, Scania, Andrew Stephens, Sustainable Gouveia, Project Drawdown PIK, Victor Galaz, SRC, Nick Gaskell, Engaged Tracking
Shipping Initiative, Nicole Rencoret, Sustainable Shipping
Initiative, Hampus Mårtensson, KTH Royal Institute of
Technology, Lisa Jacobson, Future Earth, Ryan Allard,
Climate leadership Exponential technologies
Project Drawdown AUTHORS and solutions
Johan Falk, SRC, Future Earth, Internet of Planet, Victoria AUTHOR
Olausson, WWF,
Food consumption Johan Falk, SRC, Future Earth, Internet of Planet
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTORS AND REVIEWERS

Brent Loken, EAT Forum, Stockholm Resilience Centre Pernilla Bergmark, Ericsson, Owen Gaffney, PIK, Lisa
Owen Gaffney, SRC, Pernilla Bergmark, Ericsson, Mattias
Jacobson, Future Earth, Ilona Otto, PIK
Höjer, KTH. Stefan Henningsson, WWF, Nexhi Deti,
Microsoft, Charlie Wilson, Tyndall Centre for Climate
Owen Gaffney, PIK, SRC, Avit K. Bhowmik, Karlstad Change Research.
University, Steven McGreevy, FEAST project, Anna Richert,
WWF, Olav Kjørven, EAT Forum, Lujain Alqodmani,
EAT Forum
Other contributors Scania Hanna Mattila, Sitra
EDITOR Skanska Kajsa Kramming, Uppsala University
Duncan Geere Swedish Energy Agency Karina Shyrokykh, Ericsson

Telia Company Kevin Lynch, Trinity College
PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Kristina Modée, Collaborating Centre for Sustainable
Lisa Jacobson, Future Earth STEERING GROUP
Consumption and Production
Wendy Broadgate, Future Earth
DESIGN Lina Reichenberg, Chalmers University of Technology
Markus Terho, Sitra
Alex Parrott, Storythings Markus Bylund, City of Uppsala
Mats Pellbäck Scharp, Ericsson
Mikael Karlsson, KTH Royal Institute of Technology
DATA MINING AND ANALYSIS Todd Edwards, Mission 2020
Peraphan Jittrapirom, Radboud University Nijmegen School
Krisztina Jónás, Sustainability Consultant Victor Galaz, Stockholm Resilience Centre of Management
Sophie Plitt, Sustainability Consultant Mattias Höijer, KTH Royal Institute of Technology Peter Arnfalk, Lund University
Johan Falk, Internet of Planet Ramez Naam, Singularity University
PICTURE RESEARCH
Owen Gaffney, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research Staffan Laestadius, Industrial Dynamics, KTH Royal institute
Eden Brackenbury, Storythings
of Technology
LEAD PARTNER ORGANISATIONS Yassamin Ansari, Deputy Director of Policy, Global Climate
Additional authors, contributors Action Summit, Mission 2020
Future Earth
World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF)
and reviewers in Exponential Climate
Ericsson
Action Roadmap 1.0
AUTHORS
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK)
Cities
KTH Royal Institute of Technology (KTH)
Carina Borgström-Hansson, WWF
Stockholm Resilience Centre (SRC)
Christopher Pountney, Arup
The Finnish future fund Sitra
Sofia Widforss, WWF
Mission2020
Energy Supply
Internet of Planet
Siddharth Sareen, University of Bergen
SUPPORTING PARTNER ORGANISATIONS
REVIEWERS AND OTHER CONTRIBUTORS
EAT Foundation
Amy Luers, Future Earth
Fossil-Free Sweden
Anders Nordheim, UN Environment Programme Finance
ClimateView
Initiative
IKEA
Cecilia Repinski, Stockholm Green Digital Finance
Project Drawdown
Gabrielle Giner, British Telecom
I M AG E C R E DI T S
Front cover Page 59 Page 84

Robert Bye, robjbye.com Kristoffer Trolle Kristoffer Trolle
Page 10 Page 61 Page 87

Epicurrence, epicurrence.com Brid/Fossil Free Sweden NÜWIEL GmbH
Betolar
Page 21 Page 88
Andreas Gücklhorn, draufsicht.com Page 62 Nemo Bis
Paul Felix Photography / Alamy Stock Photo Kristina Blokhin / Alamy Stock Photo
Page 27
Solidarity Center
Anders Hellberg Page 89
Arild Vågen
Telia Company
Page 29 Skanska
World Vision Page 90
Page 63
ton koene / Alamy Stock Photo
Page 41 Leaderlab - Driving Transformational Change
Gustav Lindh 2015
Jean-Frédéric Apple
Page 99
Page 42 Page 64
Prostock-studio / Alamy Stock Photo
Kristina Blokhin / Alamy Stock Photo Lindström
Jessica Gow/TT
Page 43 Page 68 Jeppe Gustafsson / Alamy Stock Photo
Mark Kerrison / Alamy Stock Photo Maarten Deckers, maartendeckers.com Mk2010
Page 48 Page 71 Page 100

Kai Gradert, photos.kaigradert.com Apple Richard Levine / Alamy Stock Photo
Ericsson Too Good To Go
Page 51
Aerovista Luchtfotografie / Shutterstock.com Jane Ali / Alamy Stock Photo
Ashley Cooper pics / Alamy Stock Photo
Bill Cheyrou / Alamy Stock Photo
Imaginechina Limited / Alamy Stock Photo Page 72
Bando26
Telia Company
Page 52
Gorodenkoff / Shutterstock.com Page 104
Rachel Torres / Alamy Stock Photo
Rita Chou on Unsplash
Afloresm Page 76
Denys Nevozhai, dnevozhai.com Page 108
Page 53
Mike Goldwater / Alamy Stock Photo
imageBROKER / Alamy Stock Photo Page 79
Minden Pictures / Alamy Stock Photo
Vattenfall Flowscape
Andrei Stanescu / Alamy Stock Photo Empire State Realty Trust Page 110
US Department of Agriculture
Page 54 Page 80
US Army Corps of Engineers Sacramento District
David Clarke GOODLUZ / Alamy Stock Photo
TRINE Øyvind Holmstad v/PermaLiv Page 116
Danfoss Emmad Mazhari, mazhari.me
Page 117 Page 148

Tony Webster Kamyar Adl
Xinhua / Alamy Stock Photo
Page 118
Niklas Lundegård Page 150
SpaceX, spacex.com
Page 119
Linuxthink Page 156
WhereIsMyTransport WeWork
Einride
Page 120
Mission Innovation
ZUMA Press, Inc. / Alamy Stock Photo
Xinhua / Alamy Stock Photo
Page 122
Muhammed Fayiz, U
nsplash
Page 124
SITRA
Page 130
UNclimatechange, CC BY 2.0
Page 133
Norsk Elbilforening
Page 134
US Air Force photo/Airman 1st Class Jonathan Olds
Page 138
NASA on Unsplash
Page 140
Skanska
Page 141
Johan Falk
Page 142
Orkhan Farmanli, instagram.com/orkhanfarmanli
Page 144
The Financial Stability Board
Cyberstock / Alamy Stock Photo
LET’S HALVE
GLOBAL
EMISSIONS BY
www.exponentialroadmap.org
Lead partners
Supporting partners

ExponentialRoadmap 1.5 20190919 Single-Pages

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

ExponentialRoadmap 1.5 20190919 Single-Pages

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

ExponentialRoadmap 1.5 20190919 Single-Pages

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

SCALING 36 SOLUTIONS TO

HALVE EMISSIONS BY 2030

VERSION 1.5, 2019.

This roadmap uniquely focuses on three things.

The roadmap is complemented with a high-ambition narrative, Meeting

The global economic benefit of a low-carbon future is estimated at

Exponential Roadmap: 36 solutions to cut greenhouse gas emissions 50% by 2030

ENERGY SUPPLY INDUSTRY BUILDINGS TRANSPORT

18.5 17.1 9.9 8.6

75% 75% 75% 75%

TOTAL EMISSIONS (Billions of tonnes of CO2e, baseline year 2020)

6.1 5.3 6.2 0.2 0.3 0.3

ENERGY’S OWN FOOD NATURE-BASED

6.1 17.1 9.9 8.6 5.6 6.9

TRANSPORT FOOD CONSUMPTION NATURE BASED SOURCES NATURE BASED S

8.6 5.6 6.9 0

75% 75% 75%

Carbon storage potential

FOOD CONSUMPTION NATURE BASED SOURCES NATURE BASED SINKS

Carbon storage potential

34 central banks recently joined forces to ensure a smooth transition to

The divestment movement continues to grow. Organisations with

Digital services have potential, tenfold their footprint, to reduce energy

Exponential technologies risk driving emissions upwards as digital

Navigating this report

REPORT “Transforming sectors” and “Scaling the Transformation”.

Assumptions in this report

In order to achieve rapid decarbonisation to 2030, global primary energy

Climate change is now affecting people on

Achieving a 1.5°C planet will require the

Three levers are essential for large-scale systems change:

1. A new worldview. We face unprecedented planetary risks where

2. A global goal. We need to reach net zero greenhouse gas emissions

3. A just pathway. We must aim to cut global greenhouse gas emissions

You are here 2018 projection

CO2 emissions (Gt CO2/yr)

Estimated global levellised cost

100 FOSSIL FUEL

Solar Solar Onshore Offshore

Figure 2. Price drop in solar and wind power since 2010

THE SCALE OF THE CHALLENGE

*Legislation includes options to purchase carbon credits to reach these targets.

The number of countries The number of countries

The years left until

Likewise, phrases such as “business as usual” or “current trends” should

“We will move to a low-carbon

feasible solutions available today

and individuals by 2030

Figure 4. Emissions reduction potential

CO2 Land Use

Figure 5. Greenhouse gas emissions

Difficult to decarbonise sectors 1% Long-Distance Road Transport

2020s will be essential to ensure market-ready solutions exist to halve global

10% Residential, Commercial

Figure 6. Hard to decarbonise sectors

1 Electrify energy end-use including

2 Digitalise energy-using products

3 Converge onto fewer numbers of multi-functional

4 Shift from ownership to usership

The roadmap is complemented with a high-ambition narrative, Meeting

The global economic benefit of a low-carbon future is estimated at

34 central banks recently joined forces to ensure a smooth transition to

The divestment movement continues to grow. Organisations with

Digital services have potential, tenfold their footprint, to reduce energy

Exponential technologies risk driving emissions upwards as digital

2. A global goal. We need to reach net zero greenhouse gas emissions

3. A just pathway. We must aim to cut global greenhouse gas emissions

In 2019, the UK and Ireland declared climate emergencies. In 2018,

Remove fossil-fuel subsidies and revise agricultural subsidies. PROPOSED LEGISLATION

Ensure that national decision-making, budgets, tax systems and

9,138 cities (representing 10% of the global population) have made