Action Research
Action Research
Action Research
were used. Selected sections in Grade 10 became the study participants. The
students under investigation were given Pre – Test and Post – Test to get
acceptability. All the students’ were asked to evaluate the project before and
when supplemented the instruction with the use of e – learning programs and
“A thankful heart is not just the greatest virtue but the mother of all the virtues”
- CICERO
To all of the people that help us in the completion of this project, our sincerest
gratitude and felicitations.
and related tools and technologies to provide a broad range of solutions that
latest computer technology for the faculty to use the latest software, E –
presenting video, connect to the internet, and other training devices and
equipment. Clearly, a major goal of all instruction is for the student to be able
learning software (Custodio, 2000) in ways that are similar to and tightly
intertwined with the traditional ways that they learn, teach and study in
computer contains the instruction which is designed to teach, guide and test
the curriculum.
the ultimate stakeholders, the students. This paper tries to examine Grade 10
developing E – learning projects like Adobe Flash CS4 for special effects and
animations, VB.Net for the interface design and Adobe Photoshop CS3 for
graphics enhancement.
the E- learning projects made. HTML, CSS, Java Script, AJAX and JQuery
were used for its front end; MySQL for the data base as back end of the
system; and for designs and other features, Camtasia 7.0, Adobe Photoshop
integrated in the project after analyzing the lessons and activities included in
2. What is the Mean Percentage Score (MPS) in the Pre – test and
Post – Test?
implementation?
intellectual capability. All the students in two sections were employed in the
study. Section A had thirty six (36) students, while Section B comprises of
thirty eight (38) students then, Section C had a thirty five (35) students a total
of one hundred nine (109) students under investigation in this study. All the
students had permission from the parents and all the personal information
(SDLC) model was used. It is a technique that divides complex projects into
instructional devices the researcher used the Rosenberg and Fishbein model
about attitudes and behavior. The students validated the E – learning program
cost. The instruments were given before and after the exposure to the said
devices. The Mean Percentage Score of both tests were treated statistically to
Data were tabulated and analyzed using weighted mean and standard
and after the implementation and the mean percentage score in pre – test and
second quarter the researcher evaluated the students’ attitude towards the
program before the exposure to the software. It was evident in Table 1 that
While, as said by the same students the developed e – learning software and
instructional devices does not assures schedule flexibility and it cannot
survey instrument was given to measure the students’ attitudes towards the
program that validate the level of acceptability of the said innovation. Table 2
showed that the students’ agrees with the statement in the questionnaire
manage their time and an efficient instructional method the teachers’ used.
The data presented manifests that the theory of Muzaffer was indeed
reliable about the acceptance and rejection region. According to the theory if
changes was introduced to certain group of individuals the first reaction was
to reject it but as the process continue they will learn how to accept the
negative and the acceptability level is low but after the exposure to the said
program the students’ attitudes towards the program becomes positive and
problem – solving skills and student learning. The finding is in parallel to the
to the E – learning software while, the present study used the Grade 10
students the latter study used a college student nonetheless both exhibited a
student learning.
Mean Percentage Score (MPS) result of pre – test and post - test
The researcher claimed that the e – learning software and devices was
conclusion the researcher followed the pre – test and post –test design. The
pre – test was given before the using of the said program whiles the post –
test was given after the implementation of the e – learning program. Using the
Score (MPS) same with the National Achievement Test (NAT) table 3
registered a 47.64% MPS implied that the students had an average mastery
before the lesson. Upon giving the post – test and increase in the individual
mastery performance.
devices. In this method the students were given a first - hand experience for
increase in the performance of respondents from the pre – test to post – test
and instructional devices was evident but Table 4 showed that such increase
process. After the students’ exposure to the said software and instructional
devices the students’ attitudes become positive the shift can be attributed to
learning are scheduling, flexibility, reducing cost and time saving where
towards e – learning. The recent study to measure the variable it was given
Difference between the Mean Percentage Score in the Pre – test and
Post – test
score of pre – test and post – test. There was an increase in the students’
performance in both tests but that increase is not significant. Therefore, the
null hypothesis that there is no significant difference between the pre – test
and post – test result was accepted at 0.05 confidence level wherein the
computed t – value of .003 is less than the critical value of .498. This means
that even without the aid of the said developed e – learning the students’ still
significant difference existed between the pre – test and post – test results of
the electronic learning group. Findings revealed that the performance of the
The difference in the findings of the two studies can be attributed to the
students in Physics.
helps on the improvement of the students’ performance in pre – test and post
– test. It was presented by a factorial analysis. The null hypothesis that the
does not affect the students’ performance in the post – test. This means that
the students needed a guide that managed the time for them to be able to
learn.
technical and knowledge used. This means that even without the technical
students learn in the traditional settings with a book on hand that is costly.
factor which brought up the above – mentioned findings. The locality of the
income and technical skill is low due to the low socio economic profile. The
learning. Similar to the study of Naila (2016) the result confirmed the
education though technical support and stress of using technology were noted
towards e – learning but rural girls showed less favorable attitudes compared
to urban girls students. Contrary to the findings of Rhema (2014) that the
current enrolment year and age have no effect on students’ attitude towards e
– learning.
key role in educational settings and their perception about e – learning affects
approaches and more actions are needed to improve the e – learning system.
ACTION PLAN
that the computer aided instruction is a major factor for the students’