Matter Waves. Solutions of Selected Problems: 5.1 Problem 5.11 (In The Text Book)
Matter Waves. Solutions of Selected Problems: 5.1 Problem 5.11 (In The Text Book)
Matter Waves. Solutions of Selected Problems: 5.1 Problem 5.11 (In The Text Book)
(a) What would be the kinetic energy of an electron confined to this region?
(b) On the basis of this result, would you expect to find an electron in a nucleus? Explain.
Solution
(a) The momentum of the electron is defined by its de Broglie wavelength as:
h
p =
λ
hc
pc =
λ
1.240 × 103 (eV · nm)
=
10−5 (nm)
= 1.240 × 108 eV
p
E = (pc)2 + m2e c4
p
= (1.240 × 108 )2 + (511 × 103 )2
= 1.2400 × 108 eV
= 124.0 M ev
K = E − me c2
= 124.0 − 0.511
= 123.499 M eV
(b) The kinetic energy of the electron is too large for the electron to be confined is such
small space.
Solution
The total energy of the electron is:
p
E= p2 c2 + m2e c2
Since E = ~ω and p = ~k, we get:
p
(~kc)2 + (me c2 )2
~ω =
r
(me c2 )2
ω(k) = (kc)2 +
~2
The phase velocity vp is given by:
ω
vp =
k
q
(me c2 )2
(kc)2 + ~2
=
s k
2
me c2
= c2 +
~k
and the group velocity vg is given by:
dω
vg = |k
dk ◦
1 2kc2
= q
2 2 2
k 2 c2 + m~e c
kc2
= q
me c2 2
k 2 c2 + ~
1. 0.010 M eV ,
2. 1.0 M eV , and
3. 100 M eV ?
Solution
Using the uncertainty principle, with ∆x = a and ∆p = 0.01p, where a is the slit width, we
get:
~
∆x∆p ≥
2
~
a × 0.01p =
2
~
a =
2 × 0.01p
~c
= (5.1)
0.02pc
since we are given the kinetic energy of the electron, we can find pc from:
E 2 = p2 c2 + m2e c4
p
pc = E 2 − m2e c4
p
= (K + me c2 ) − m2e c4
p
= K 2 + 2Kme c2 + m2e c4 − m2e c4
p
= K 2 + 2Kme c2 (5.2)
Now using Equation (5.2) in Equation (5.1) and take me c2 = 0.511 M eV we get:
~c
a =
0.02pc
1.973 × 10−4 (M eV · nm)
= p
0.02 K 2 (M eV )2 + 2K(M eV )me c2 (M eV )
9.865 × 10−3
= √
K 2 + 2 × 0.511K
9.865 × 10−3
= √ (5.3)
K 2 + 1.022K
(a) Using Equation (5.3) and K = 0.01 M eV we get:
9.865 × 10−3
a = √
K 2 + 1.022K
9.865 × 10−3
= p
(0.01)2 + 1.022 × 0.01
= 9.711 × 10−2 nm
9.865 × 10−3
a = √
K 2 + 1.022K
9.865 × 10−3
= p
(1.00)2 + 1.022 × 1.00
= 6.938 × 10−3 nm
9.865 × 10−3
a = √
K 2 + 1.022K
9.865 × 10−3
= p
(100)2 + 1.022 × 100
= 9.815 × 10−5 nm
A two-slit electron diffraction experiment is done with slits of unequal widths. When only
slit 1 is open, the number of electrons reaching the screen per second is 25 times the number
of electrons reaching the screen per second when only slit 2 is open. When both slits are
open, an interference pattern results in which the destructive interference is not complete.
Find the ratio of the probability of an electron arriving at an interference maximum to the
probability of an electron arriving at an adjacent interference minimum. (Hint: Use the
superposition principle).
Solution
P1 = |Ψ1 |2
With slit 2 open and slit 1 closed, we have:
P2 = |Ψ2 |2
where P1 and P2 are the probabilities that the electrons reach the screen though slit 1 and
slit 2 respectively. Ψ1 and Ψ2 are the wave functions of electrons going through slit 1 and
slit 2 respectively.
P = |Ψ1 + Ψ2 |2
= |Ψ1 |2 + |Ψ2 |2 + 2|Ψ1 ||Ψ2 | cos φ
where φ is the phase angle between the waves arriving at the screen from the two slits. So
P = Pmax when cos φ = +1 and P = Pmin when cos φ = −1. Where Pmax is the probability
that there will be a maximum intensity on the the screen and Pmin is the probability that
there will minimum intensity on the screen. Note that all probabilities are functions of
position on the screen, we then have:
Since,
P1 |Ψ1 |2
=
P2 |Ψ2 |2
= 25
|Ψ1 |
= 5
|Ψ2 |
we then get:
(a) Find and sketch the real part of the matter wave pulse shape f (x) for a Gaussian
amplitude distribution a(k), where
2 (k−k 2
a(k) = Ae−α ◦)
Note that a(k) is peaked at k◦ and has a width that decreases with increasing α. (Hint:
In order to put
Z ∞
1
f (x) = √ a(k)eikx dk
2π −∞
(b) By comparing the result for the real part of f (x) to the standard form of a Gaussian
2
function with width ∆x, f (x) ∝ Ae−(x/2∆x) show that the width of the matter wave
pulse is ∆x = α.
(c) Find the width ∆k of a(k) by writing a(k) in standard Gaussian form and show that
∆x∆k = 21 , independent of α.
Solution
2 (k−k 2
a(k) = Ae−α ◦)
2 2 2
= Ae−α (k −2kk◦ +k◦ )
2 2 2 2
= Ae−α k◦ e−α (k −2kk◦ )
Z ∞
1
f (x) = √ a(k) eikx dk
2π −∞
Z ∞
1 2 2 2 2
= √ Ae−α k◦ e−α (k −2kk◦ ) eikx dk
2π −∞
Z ∞
1 −α2 k◦2 2 2
= √ Ae e−α (k −2kk◦ ) eikx dk
2π
Z−∞
∞
1 2 2 2 2
= √ Ae−α k◦ e−α (k −2kk◦ )+ikx dk
2π
Z−∞
∞
1 −α2 k◦2 2 2 2
= √ Ae e−α (k −2kk◦ −ikx/α ) dk
2π
Z−∞
∞
1 −α2 k◦2
= √ Ae eβ dk
2π −∞
ikx
where β = −α2 (k 2 − 2kk◦ − α2
).
2 2 ikx
β = −α k − 2kk◦ − 2
α
2 2 ix
= −α k − 2k k◦ + 2
2α
" 2 2 #
ix ix ix
= −α2 k 2 − 2k k◦ + 2 + k◦ + 2 − k◦ + 2
2α 2α 2α
2 2
ix ix
= −α2 k + k◦ + 2 + α 2 k◦ + 2
2α 2α
Z ∞
1 ix 2
−α2 k◦2 α2 (k◦ + 2α ) ix 2
e−α [k+(k◦ + 2α2 )] dk
2
f (x) = √ Ae e 2
2π
Z−∞
∞
1 ix 2
= √ Ae−α k◦ eα (k◦ + 2α2 )
2 2 2 2 2
e−α z dz
2π −∞
ix
where z = k + k◦ + 2α2
and dz = dk. Since,
Z ∞ √
−α2 z 2 π
e =
−∞ α
∫ e dz :
−∞
then f (x) becomes:
−α 2 ( k 2 −( 2 k0 + ix α 2 ) k ) +α 2 ( k0 + ix 2α 2 ) −α 2 ( k − ( k0 + ix 2√
α 2 ))
2 2
e =e 1 e2 2 2 ix 2 π
f (x) = √ A e−α k◦ eα (k◦ + 2α2 )
A −α2π2 k02 α 2 ( k0 + ix 2α 2 )2 +∞α −α 2 ( k −( k0 + ix 2α 2 ) )2
f ( x) = = e A √ ee−α k◦ eα [k◦ +(ik◦ x/α )−(x
2 2 2 2 2
∫ e/4α4 )]
2 dk
2π α 2 k =−∞
A2 −α 2 k2 α2 k+∞
2 2 /4α2
A= −√ x 4eα 2 ik0ex
◦ ◦ eik◦ x e−x
−α 2 z 2
= eα 2 e ∫ e dz
2π A −x2 /4α2 zik=−∞
= √ e e ◦x
α 2
A 2 /4α2
=+∞ √ e2 −x
π
(cos1 k2◦ x + i sin k◦ x)
where z = k − k0 +
ix α −2α z 2 A − x2 4α 2 ik0 x
. Since ∫ e dz = , f ( x) = e e . The real
2α 2 z =−∞ α α 2
The real part of f (x), Ref (x), is:
A − x2 4α 2
part of f ( x ) , Re f ( x ) is Re f ( x ) =
eA cos k0 x and is a gaussian envelope
α 2
Ref (x) = √ e −x /4α
cos k◦ x
2 2
α 2
multiplying a harmonic wave with wave number k0 . A plot of Re f ( x ) is shown
and is composed of a Gaussian envelope multiplied by a harmonic wave with a wave
below: number k◦ . A plot of Ref (x) is shown in Figure (5.1).
Re f ( x )
A 2
4α 2
e− x
α 2
cos k 0 x
Figure 5.1:
A − x2 4α 2 −( x 2 ∆x )
2
Comparing e to Ae implies ∆x = α .
α 2
(b) Comparing
A −x2 /4α2
√ e
α 2
to
2
Ae−(x/2∆x)
implies that ∆x = α.
2 (k−k+◦)2
a(k) = Ae−α
2 /(2∆k)2
a(k) = Ae−(k−k◦ )
the last equation makes a(k) takes the standard Gaussian form, so we then have:
1 1
∆x∆k = ×α=
2α 2