11 Earthquake Hazard Maps Liquefaction
11 Earthquake Hazard Maps Liquefaction
11 Earthquake Hazard Maps Liquefaction
Geology and Earth Resources Division geologists actively identify, assess, and map geologic hazards for
land-use and emergency-management planning, disaster response, and building-code amendment. As our
population grows, there is increasing pressure to develop in hazardous areas. Delineation of these areas has
never been more important. This activity covers: Amplification, Slope Instability and Liquefaction
The red on this map tells you that if you build near the river, or in a valley on Shaking sands can take down large buildings as shown in the photograph
unconsolidated sediment, you better make sure that you have engineered of buildings tilted by ground failure caused by liquefaction. Nigata, Japan
your house for earthquake stabiity. Otherwise, “will not stand, oh no!” earthquake (www.noaa.gov
Causes and Characteristics of the Hazard While all three types of quakes possess the potential to
Seismic events were once thought to pose little or no threat cause major damage, Subduction zone earthquakes pose
to Oregon communities. However, recent earthquakes the greatest danger. The source for such events lies off the
and scientific evidence indicate that the risk to people and Oregon coast and is known as the Cascadia Subduction
property is much greater than previously thought. Oregon Zone (CSZ). A major CSZ event could generate an
and the Pacific Northwest in general are susceptible to earthquake with a magnitude of 9.0 or greater resulting in
earthquakes from three sources: devastating damage and loss of life.
1) the off-shore Cascadian Subduction Zone; Geologic evidence suggests that most of the Pacific
2) deep intra-plate events within the subducting Juan de Northwest is at risk from large earthquakes. In 1700, a
Fuca Plate; and mega-quake occurred on the Cascadia subduction zone
3) shallow crustal events within the North American Plate. just off the Pacific Northwest.
The hazard maps, and much of this text and two activities are from DOGAMI and WA DNR : http://www.oregongeology.org/sub/default.htm and
http://www.dnr.wa.gov/ResearchScience/Topics/GeologicHazardsMapping/Pages/geologic_hazards.aspx
Steep slopes can be particularly hazardous during and after earthquakes. In the long rainy season
of winter and spring, soils can become saturated and quakes can produce rapidly moving landslides.
However landslides may be triggered by shaking, even on relatively gentle slopes. In dry areas, rock fall
can be deadly; one death in the 1993 Klamath Falls earthquake was from rock fall.
Procedure:
Materials:
• Place the paper towel tube upright in the center of the
• Pan or tray with edges
pan. Carefully pour the sediments into the tube. Lift
• 500 ml or more gravel or any other small
the paper tube allowing the sediments to fall out into
sediments
a symmetrical cone demonstrating the material’s
• Paper towel tube
angle of repose. This angle serves as a constant for
• Monopoly© sized buildings
the steepness of a slope for a particular material –
undisturbed.
• See note next page for editable Word doc.
• Carefully place one or more houses onto the slope.
• Explain that an earthquake can cause the materials on a
slope to become unstable by disturbing the cohesion
that holds soil particles together.
• Gently tap the pan with your hand or a ruler to simulate
an earthquake and watch the hill slope “fail” or
collapse.
Extensions:
Try using different sediments or combinations of
sediments. Use water to help over -steepen the hillside, or
replicate ground saturation.
Ground Amplification:
To learn more about how the Earthquake Hazard Maps were developed visit:
http://nwdata.geol.pdx.edu/DOGAMI/IMS-08/Text/IMS-08-CD-Text.html
108
Hazard Map Activity 2: Ground Amplification:
Demonstration: Earthquakes and Ground Amplification
Ground shaking amplification refers to the soils and soft sedimentary rocks near the surface that can modify ground
shaking from an earthquake. Such factors can increase or decrease the amplification (i.e., strength) as well as the
frequency of the shaking.
Procedure: Materials:
• Pace a small heavy object on the cinder • Cinderblock to simulate bedrock
block and another on the gravel. • Pan with aquarium gravel to simulate loose
• Strike the cinder block with a hammer alluvium or soil “geologic Jell-O”
and observe • Small heavy object such as a weight, film
• Repeat with the pan of gravel and canister with sand
observe
An editable Word document called:
Questioning: Liquefaction_Teacher and student_WORD.doc
• What happens when the energy of a is in the folder:
“seismic” P wave passes through each 3. ACTIVITIES_Earthquake & Tsunami
sample material?
• What could each material sample Earthquake Hazard Maps & Liquefaction
represent in a real-world setting? RESOURCES
• What features of good building
design help protect buildings in areas
susceptible to ground amplification?
Liquefaction:
Earth Liquefaction takes place when ground
shaking causes granular soils to turn from a
solid into a liquid state. This in turn causes
soils to lose their strength and their ability to
support weight.
110
Liquefaction—Individual student activity
By Chris Hedeen, Oregon City High School, Oregon City OR
What do I do?
Instructions and discussion are intercalated in the student worksheets on the next pages.
Teacher answer key begins on page 12 of this document. Editable Word documents are
in the RESOURCES folder noted below.
Background
Information on “Liquefaction: What it is and what to do about it” and
“ShakeMaps”—Instant Maps of Earthquake Shaking are on this DVD in the folder
3. ACTIVITIES_Earthquake & Tsunami
Earthquake Hazard Maps & Liquefaction
RESOURCES
plus
Liquefaction
A common cause of damage during earthquakes is the result of liquefaction
of the soil. When earthquake vibrations pass through sand or silt, which has a
high liquid content, the soil loses the properties of a solid and takes on those of
a dense liquid, like quicksand or pudding. The solid strength sand or silt comes
from the friction between the grains touching each other. As shaking continues,
the pressure of the water between the grains increases until the pore pressure
almost equals the external pressure on the soil. At this point the grains spread
apart and, after sufficient strength is lost, the sand and water flows.
Procedures Model 1
Obtain a small plastic or paper cup. Fill it three-quarters full with dry sand
(sediment). Place several coins in the sediment so they resemble vertical walls of
buildings constructed on a substrate of uncompacted sediment. This is Model 1.
112
Name:_________________
Model 2
Remove the coins from model one, and add a small bit of water to the sediment
in the cup so that it is moist (but not soupy). Press down on the sediment in the
cup so that it is well compacted, and then place the coins into this compacted
sediment just as you placed them in Model 1 earlier. Simulate an earthquake as
you did for Model 1, and then answer questions 2 and 3.
Write out your question (objective) and procedures on next page before
conducting the experiment.
Procedures:
114
Name:_________________
Figure 1 Map of the nature and distribution of Earth mate- Figure 2 Seismograms recorded at Stations X, Y, and Z, for a
rials on which buildings and roads have been constructed strong (Richter Magnitude 4.6) aftershock of the Loma Prieta, Cali-
for a portion of San Francisco, California. fornia, earthquake. During the earthquake, little damage occurred
at X, but significant damage to houses occurred at Y and Z.
On October 17, 1989, just as Game 3 of the World Series was about to
start in San Francisco, a strong earthquake occurred at Loma Prieta,
California, and shook the entire San Francisco Bay area. Seismographs
at locations X, Y, and Z (Figure 1) recorded the shaking, and resulting
seismographs are shown in Figure 2.
116
6. The Loma Prieta earthquake shook the entire San Francisco Bay
region. Yet Figure 2 is evidence that the earthquake had very
different effects on properties located only 600 m, apart. Explain
how the kind of substrate (uncompacted vs. firm and compacted)
on which buildings are constructed influences how much the
buildings are shaken and damaged in an earthquake
7. Imagine that you are a member of the San Francisco City Council.
What actions could you propose to mitigate (decrease the probability
of ) future earthquake hazards like the damage that occurred at
locations Y and Z in the Loma Prieta earthquake?
Procedures Model 1
Obtain a small plastic or paper cup. Fill it three-quarters full with dry sand
(sediment). Place several coins in the sediment so they resemble vertical
walls of buildings constructed on a substrate of uncompacted sediment. This
is Model 1.
The coins tip horizontally and sank slightly into the sediment. Overall
movement isn’t great.
Answers will vary. The vibrations of the shaking cause both the particles of
the sediment and the coins to shift.
118
KEY
Model 2
Remove the coins from model one, and add a small bit of water to the
sediment in the cup so that it is moist (but not soupy). Press down on the
sediment in the cup so that it is well compacted, and then place the coins into
this compacted sediment just as you placed them in Model 1 earlier. Simulate
an earthquake as you did for Model 1, and then answer questions 2 and 3.
The more saturated the soil, the more hazardous it becomes to build on it.
Procedures:
120
KEY
Loma Prieta Earthquake
San Francisco is located in a tectonically active region, so it occasionally experiences strong
earthquakes. Figure 1 is a map showing the kinds of Earth materials upon which buildings have
been constructed in a portion of San Francisco. These materials include hard compact Franciscan
Sandstone, uncompacted beach and dune sands, river gravel, and artificial fill. The artificial fill in
mostly debris from buildings destroyed in the great 1906 earthquake that reduced large portions
of the city to blocks of rubble. Also note that three locations have been labeled X, Y, and Z on Figure
1. Imagine that you have been hired by and insurance company to asses what risk there may be in
building newly constructed apartment buildings located at X, Y, and Z on Figure 1. Your job is to
infer whether the risk of property damage during strong earthquakes in low (little or no damage
expected) or high (damage can be expected). All that you have as a basis for reasoning is Figure 1
and knowledge of your experiments with the liquefaction models.
On October 17, 1989, just as Game 3 of the World Series was about to start in
San Francisco, a strong earthquake occurred at Loma Prieta, California, and
shook the entire San Francisco Bay area. Seismographs at locations X, Y, and
Z (Figure 1) recorded the shaking, and resulting seismographs are shown in
Figure 2.
Answers will vary. Greatest damage in those areas that have highest risk for
liquefaction (uncompacted artificial fill) and least damage in areas that have
well compacted rocks (sandstone).
122
KEY
7. Imagine that you are a member of the San Francisco City Council. What
actions could you propose to mitigate (decrease the probability of )
future earthquake hazards like the damage that occurred at locations Y
and Z in the Loma Prieta earthquake?