Astm G 88 PDF
Astm G 88 PDF
Astm G 88 PDF
1
This guide is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee G04 on Compatibility
2
and Sensitivity of Materials in Oxygen Enriched Atmospheres and is the direct For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or
responsibility of Subcommittee G04.02 on Recommended Practices. contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM
Current edition approved July 1, 2005. Published November 2005. Originally Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on
approved in 1984. Last previous edition approved in 1997 as G 88 – 90 (1997)e1. the ASTM website.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.
--````,,``,,`,`,``````,```,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
--````,,``,,`,`,``````,```,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
G 145 Studying Fire Incidents in Oxygen Systems
able, the temperature of the material will increase. In some
G 126 Terminology Related to the Compatibility and Sensitivity of cases, a thermal runaway temperature (a critical condition)
Materials in Oxygen-Enriched Atmospheres
A
may be attained and some time later the material may sponta-
ASTM D 2863 is under the jurisdiction of Committee D20 on Plastics, and
D 4809 is under the jurisdiction of Committee D02 on Petroleum Products and neously ignite. Ignition and fire may occur after short (seconds
Lubricants but both are used in the asessment of flammability and sensitivity of or minutes) or over long (hours, days or months) periods of
materials in oxygen-enriched atmospheres. time. In the most extreme cases, the thermal runaway tempera-
ture may be near or below normal room temperature. The
present to start and propagate a fire. Since materials of characteristic elements of spontaneous ignition in oxidants
construction of the system are often flammable and oxygen is
include the following:
always present, the design of a system for oxygen or oxygen-
enriched service requires identifying potential sources of 5.2.2.1 A material that reacts (for example, oxidizes, de-
ignition and the factors that aggravate propagation. The goal is composes) at temperatures significantly below its ignition
to eliminate these factors or compensate for their presence. temperature. If the rate of reaction is low, the effect of reaction
Preventing fires in oxygen and oxygen-enriched systems in- can still be large if the material has a high surface-area-to-
volves all of the following: minimizing system factors that volume ratio (such as dusts, particles, foams, chars, etc.).
cause fires and environments that enhance fire propagation; Likewise, materials that will not spontaneously combust in
maximizing the use of system materials with properties that bulk forms may become prone to do so when subdivided. In
resist ignition and burning, especially where ignition mecha- some cases, reaction products may instead serve to passivate
nisms are active; and using good practices during system the material surface producing a protective coating that pre-
design, assembly, operations and maintenance. vents ignition so long as it is not compromised (by melting,
5.2 Factors Recognized as Causing Fires: cracking, flaking, spalling, evaporating. etc.). Reaction prod-
5.2.1 Temperature—As the temperature of a material in- ucts may also stratify or otherwise form an ignition-resistant
creases, the amount of energy that must be added to produce barrier.
gas, then exposed to oxygen. Contaminated adsorbent or oxygen systems so that they have a higher risk of igniting upon
absorbent materials such as molecular sieves (zeolites), alu- impact. High velocities can occur as a result of reducing
mina, and activated carbon may become highly reactive in pressure across a system component or during a system start-up
oxygen-enriched atmospheres. transient where pressure is being established through a com-
5.2.3 Pressure—As the pressure of a system increases, the ponent or in a pipeline. Components with inherently high
ignition temperatures of the materials of construction typically internal fluid velocities include pressure regulators, control
decrease (2, 3), and the rates of fire propagation increase (2, 4). valves, and flow-limiting orifices. Depending on system con-
Therefore, operating a system at unnecessarily elevated pres- figuration, some components can generate high fluid velocities
sures increases the probability and consequences of a fire. It that can be sustained for extended distances downstream.
should be noted that pure oxygen, even at lower–than- System start-ups or shut-downs can create transient gas veloci-
atmospheric pressure, may still pose a significant fire hazard ties that are often orders of magnitude higher than those
since increased oxygen concentration has a greater effect than experienced during steady-state operation.
total pressure on the flammability of materials (5, 6). NOTE 2—The pressure differential that can be tolerated to control high
5.2.4 Concentration—As oxygen concentration decreases gas velocities is significantly smaller than for control of downstream heat
from 100 % with the balance being inert gases, there is a of compression (8) (see 5.2.7 for discussion of heat of compression). Even
small pressure differentials across components can generate gas velocities
progressive decrease in the likelihood and intensity of a
in excess of those recommended for various metals in oxygen service (9,
reaction (2). Though the principles in this standard still apply, 10). Eq 1 can be used to estimate the downstream gas pressure for a given
greater latitude may be exercised in the design of a system for upstream pressure and maximum downstream gas velocity, assuming an
dilute oxygen service. ideal gas and isentropic flow (8):
5.2.5 Contamination—Contamination can be present in a PT
PD 5 (1)
system because of inadequate initial cleaning, introduction
during assembly or service life, or generation within the system FS VD2
D G
2gcKRTD 1 1
K
FIG. 1 Maximum Oxygen Gas Velocity Produced by Pressure Differentials, Assuming Isentropic Flow
5.2.6.4 Flammable Materials—Generally, both the par- vulnerable to direct ignition by this mechanism. Fig. 2 shows
ticle(s) and the target (impact point) materials must be flam- an example of a compression heating sequence leading to
mable in the given environment for ignition and sustained ignition of a nonmetal valve seat. Sequence A shows high-
burning to occur. However, particle impact ignition studies pressure oxygen upstream of a fast-opening valve in the closed
have shown that some highly flammable metals, such as position. Downstream of the valve is oxygen at initial pressure,
aluminum alloys, may ignite even when impacted by inert volume, and temperature (Pi, Vi, Ti, respectively). Pi and Ti are
particles (7). Additionally, common nonmetal particles have assumed to be at ambient conditions in this example). A second
been shown to be ineffective igniters of metals by particle valve with a nonmetallic seat is shown downstream in the
impact (12), and softer nonmetal targets, though more prone to closed position, representing a “dead-end,” or closed volume.
ignition by other means, are generally less susceptible to direct Sequence B shows the opening of the fast-opening valve,
ignition by particle impact because they tend to cushion the rapidly pressurizing the downstream volume with high-
impact (13). This cushioning effect of nonmetals can act to pressure oxygen (final pressure shown as Pf), compressing and
increase the time-to-zero velocity of a particle, lower its peak heating the original gas volume. The final temperature gener-
deceleration, and generally create a less destructive collision. ated at the “dead-end” from such an event (shown as Tf) can
However, harder nonmetal targets, such as those used in some exceed the ignition temperature of the exposed nonmetal valve
valve seat applications, have been shown to ignite in particle seat and cause it to ignite. The presence of lubricant, debris, or
impact studies (13). other contaminants proximate to the valve seat may increase
5.2.7 Heat of Compression—Heat is generated from the the hazard since they may be easier to ignite. Once ignited, the
conversion of mechanical energy when a gas is compressed lubricant, debris, or other contaminants may begin a kindling
from a lower to a higher pressure. High gas temperatures can chain (see 5.2.14). In order for ignition to occur, pressurization
result if this compression occurs quickly enough to simulate of the downstream volume must be rapid enough to create
adiabatic (no heat transfer) conditions. Heat of compression near-adiabatic heating, as discussed below. The characteristic
has also been referred to as compression heating, pneumatic elements for heat of compression include the following:
impact, rapid pressurization, adiabatic compression, and gas- 5.2.7.1 Compression Pressure Ratio—In order to produce
eous impact. This can occur when high-pressure oxygen is temperatures capable of igniting most materials in oxygen
released into a dead-ended tube or pipe, quickly compressing environments, a significant compression pressure ratio (Pf/Pi)
the residual oxygen initially in the tube or pipe. The elevated is required, where the final pressure is significantly higher than
gas temperatures produced can ignite contaminants or materi- the starting pressure.
als in system components. The hazard of heat of compression NOTE 4—Eq 2 shows a formula7 for the theoretical maximum tempera-
increases with system pressure and with pressurization rates. ture (Tf) that can be developed when pressurizing a gas rapidly from one
Heat of compression is considered by many to be the most
commonly experienced mechanism that directly ignites non-
metals in oxygen systems. In general, metal alloys are not 7
Formula shown is based upon isentropic flow relations for a ideal gas.
--````,,``,,`,`,``````,```,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
FIG. 2 Example of a Compression Heating Sequence Leading to Ignition of a Nonmetal Valve Seat
--````,,``,,`,`,``````,```,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
FIG. 4 Final Compression Temperatures for Final Pressures Given the Initial Presssures Shown
5.2.10 Static Electric Discharge—Accumulated static poorly cleaned, inadequately grounded piping; two pieces of
charge on a nonconducting surface can discharge with enough clothing or fabric creating a static discharge when quickly
energy to ignite the material receiving the discharge. Static pulled apart; and large diameter ball valves with nonmetal
electrical discharge may be generated by high fluid flow under upstream and downstream seats, where the ball/stem can
certain conditions, especially where particulate matter is become electrically isolated from the body and can develop a
present. Examples of static electric discharge include arcing in charge differential between the ball and body from the ball
rubbing against the large surface area nonmetallic seat. The seat from a plug-style cylinder valve that has been cycled
characteristic elements of static discharge include the follow- extensively and is used in a throttling manner. Flow friction
ing: ignition is supported by unverifiable anecdotes. The back-
5.2.10.1 Static charge buildup from flow or rubbing accu- ground for the flow friction hypothesis suggests the character-
mulates on a nonconducting surface. istic elements:
5.2.10.2 Discharge typically occurs at a point source be- 5.2.12.1 Higher-pressure Systems—Though there is cur-
tween materials of differing electrical potentials. rently no clearly defined lower pressure threshold where flow
5.2.10.3 Two charged surfaces are not likely to discharge friction ignition becomes inactive, the current known fire
unless one material is conductive. history is in higher-pressure systems operating at approxi-
5.2.10.4 Accumulation of charge is more likely in a dry gas mately 3.5 MPa (500 psi) or higher.
or a dry environment as opposed to a moist or humid 5.2.12.2 Configurations including leaks past nonmetal com-
environment. ponent seats or pressure seals, or “weeping” or “scrubbing”
5.2.11 Electrical Arc—Sufficient electrical current arcing flow configurations around nonmetals. These configurations
from a power source to a flammable material can cause can include external leaks past elastomeric pressure seals or
ignition. Examples include a defective pressure switch or an internal flows on or close to plastic seats in components. Flow
insulated electrical heater element undergoing short circuit friction is not believed to be a credible ignition source for
arcing through its sheath to a combustible material. The metals.
characteristic elements of electrical arc ignition include the 5.2.12.3 Surfaces of nonmetals that are highly fibrous from
following: being chafed, abraded, or plastically deformed may render flow
5.2.11.1 Ungrounded or short-circuited power source such friction more severe. The smaller, more easily ignited fibers of
as a motor brush (especially if dirty and/or high powered), the nonmetal may begin resonating, or vibrating/flexing, per-
electrical control equipment, instrumentation, lighting, etc. haps at high frequencies due to flow, and this “friction” of the
5.2.11.2 Flammable materials capable of being ignited by material would generate heat.
the electrical arc or spark. 5.2.13 Mechanical Impact—Heat can be generated from the
5.2.12 Flow Friction—It is theorized that oxygen and transfer of kinetic energy when an object having a relatively
oxygen-enriched gas flowing across the surface of or imping- large mass or momentum strikes a material. In an oxygen
ing directly upon nonmetals can generate heat within the environment, the heat and mechanical interaction between the
nonmetal, causing it to self-ignite. Though neither well under- objects can cause ignition of the impacted material. The
stood, well documented in literature, nor well demonstrated in characteristic elements of mechanical impact ignition include
experimental efforts to date, several oxygen fires have been the following:
attributed to this mechanism when no other apparent mecha- 5.2.13.1 Single, Large Impact or Repeated Impacts—
nisms were active aside from a leaking, or scrubbing action of Example: If a high-pressure relief valve “chatters,” it can
--````,,``,,`,`,``````,```,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
gas across a nonmetal surface (most commonly a polymer) impart repeated impacts on a nonmetallic seat, in combination
(18). An example is ignition of a nonmetallic cylinder valve with other effects, and lead to ignition of the seat.
NOTE 19—Unlike fuel gas systems, oxygen systems generally do not (2) Consider that even small pressure differentials across
require inert gas purges after use, prior to “breaking into” the system for components can generate gas velocites in excess of those
maintenance. The bulk materials of construction are often considered recommended for various metals in oxygen service (see
situationally nonflammable at ambient conditions (even with 5.2.6.2) (9, 10).
commercially-pure oxygen in the system), and the energies required to 7.6.3 Use burn-resistant materials where gas velocities can-
ignite these materials under these conditions are very high. If there exists
not be minimized (such as internal to and immediately up-
a possibility of fuel gases or other ignitable contaminants being present,
inert gas purges prior to maintenance are generally required. stream and downstream of throttling valves).
7.5.5 Consider the locations and effects of operationally- NOTE 24—High-velocity and turbulent gas streams may be present in
generated contaminants in oxygen systems. systems where the average cross-sectional velocity is calculated to be
acceptable. For example, flow through a throttling valve or from small-
NOTE 20—Components that, simply by their function, generate particu- bore piping into large-bore piping may create localized high-velocity jets,
lates include compressors, pumps, check-valves, rotating-stem valves, and eddies and turbulence. These flow disturbances may cause high-velocity
quick-disconnect fittings. fluids to impinge against the interior of the larger piping. However at some
NOTE 21—Erosion in system piping caused by particle impingement point, the high-velocity fluid caused by these flow disturbances will settle
can produce additional particulate debris and potentially contribute to and again resemble the calculated average velocity of the flowing fluid.
ignition in an oxygen environment. Erosion has been shown to depend Traditional practice (9) has been to assume that the flow velocities within
strongly on the angle of impact (angle between the direction of motion of the pipe will approach the average velocity within a distance of about
the impinging particle and the tangent to the impacted surface at the point eight to ten internal pipe diameters. Therefore, burn-resistant alloys are
of impact) and the properties of the impacted material, among other often used for a minimum of eight inside pipe diameters (based on the
factors (58). For ductile materials, erosion is considered most severe at smallest diameter that would produce an acceptable average velocity)
impact angles between 20 and 30 degrees, as material removal is implied downstream of high-velocity flow disturbances. In some applications, the
to be predominantly by plastic flow. For brittle materials, erosion is required length of burn-resistant alloy may also be determined using
considered most severe at a 90 degree impact angle, and material removal computational fluid dynamics to model areas of high velocity and
is implied to be predominantly by brittle fracture. impingement.
7.6 Avoid Particle Impacts. NOTE 25—If a high-velocity stream flows at right angles from a small
diameter line, d, into a large diameter line, D, as shown in the bypass valve
NOTE 22—Particle impact can lead to ignition and fire in oxygen assembly in Fig. 8, then the design should ensure the flow is settled (that
FIG. 7 Converging/Diverging Geometries that can Produce Venturi Effects and High Local Velocities
is, gas velocities should be low) before it reaches the opposite wall to these impingement sites should be calculated and appropriate materials
avoid designing for impingement at this location (circled in Fig. 8). considered.
However, as in all oxygen system designs, the worst-case gas velocities at
--````,,``,,`,`,``````,```,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
transient gas velocities. resetting (35) or manually resetting excess flow valves, to
NOTE 28—System start-up dynamics can produce gas velocities and
reduce particle acceleration and to reduce both the conse-
flow profiles that are more severe than those for steady-state flow quences of ignition and the volume of oxygen that is available
conditions. Slow pressurization of a system can minimize these dynamics. for reaction or release during a fire (see 7.12.1.1).
7.6.9 Relocate vulnerable impingement sites.
7.6.6 Do not impinge gas streams onto seats, seals, or other
7.6.9.1 Locate vulnerable components out of both the
plastics or elastomers.
normal- and upset-flow path.
NOTE 29—Gas streams that impinge on nonmetals can cause premature
deterioration of the nonmetal and lead to ignition by several mechanisms NOTE 32—In Fig. 11, for pressure taps, location A is an impingement
(for example, see flow friction, 5.2.12). Further, particulate entrained in point for larger particles. Locations B, and C, are less vulnerable.
gas streams can become embedded in the nonmetal and create surface NOTE 33—Flow through elbows and curved piping can produce in-
impurities that may render the nonmetal more vulnerable to ignition. creased velocities through the establishment of twin-vortex secondary
flow that may occur for some distance and may cause smaller particles to
7.6.7 Design for particle impacts to be at shallow oblique impact the wall or other obstacles, as shown in Fig. 11 (36).
angles where practical. NOTE 34—In assessing flow patterns in oxygen systems, modern
7.6.7.1 Use the calculated normal (perpendicular) compo- computational fluid dynamics software can be helpful. These programs
nent of particle velocity as the effective gas velocity. can calculate local gas velocities and gas directionality which can aid in
--````,,``,,`,`,``````,```,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
FIG. 10 Debris in Ball Valve Installations, Side and End Views
evaluating the particle impact ignition hazard. exceeds their autogenous ignition temperatures and minimum ignition
energies.
7.6.10 Eliminate impingement sites when possible.
7.6.10.1 Do not use weld-backup rings. The edge of back-up 7.7.1 Do not rapidly compress gas volumes against nonme-
ring can be a blunt target for particles (see Fig. 12A) tallic materials.
7.6.10.2 Match piping joint bores carefully to prevent the NOTE 36—Rapidly pressurizing nonmetallic materials to pressures
edge from being a blunt target (see Fig. 12B). greater than 3.4 MPa (500 psi) can generate theoretical maximum
7.6.10.3 Match flange-gasket bores to piping inside diam- temperatures greater than the autogenous ignition temperature of all
eter (see Fig. 12C). practical nonmetallic materials (see 5.2.7.1, Table 2).
7.6.10.4 Avoid large reduction ratios in pipe reducers (see
7.7.2 Avoid rapid pressurization of components.
Fig. 12D).
7.7.2.1 Avoid the use of fast-opening valves where down-
(1) Inlet:outlet diameter ratios > 3:1 are considered im-
stream system volumes can be quickly pressurized.
pingement sites (9).
7.6.10.5 Use elbows and bent pipe with large ratios of NOTE 37—Fast-opening valves (such as standard ball valves) may be
curvature to diameter (L:d). used if specifically designed to enable slow pressurization or used
(1) Industry practice states that piping bends with a radius strategically for isolation only and are never opened with a differential
pressure across the valve.
of curvature less than 1.5 times the pipe diameter (R < 1.5D)
are considered impingement locations (9). More “conserva- 7.7.2.2 Select automatic valve operators that are slow open-
tive” designs have historically considered R<5D as causing ing.
impingement (31). 7.7.2.3 Install flow restrictors where practical to limit pres-
7.7 Minimize Heat of Compression. surization rates.
NOTE 35—Heat of compression (also called adiabatic compression or NOTE 38—Orifice plates that are used for flow restriction typically
pneumatic impact) is heat transferred when a gas is compressed (see experience high pressure differentials and choked flow. To reduce the risk
5.2.7). Ignition can occur if the temperature produced and the energy of particle impact ignition, burn-resistant materials should be used for the
transferred to surrounding vulnerable materials (typically polymers) orifice plastes and components/piping immediately downstream up to the
point of flow settling (see 7.6.3). Orifice plates that are used for flow For example, if a downstream pressure is at least 90 % of the upstream
measurement typically experience relatively small pressure drops and only absolute pressure, then its compression only increases the system tem-
marginal gas velocity increases. They are much less severe in service and perature by 9°C (16°F), usually sufficient to defeat this ignition mecha-
are often treated as impingement sites but not necessarily as causing nism (8). If the downstream pressure is at least 50 % of the upstream
hazards downstream. absolute pressure (pressure ratio = 2), then its compression results in a
7.7.2.4 Provide for pressure equalization across rapid- final estimated temperature of less than 93°C (200°F) (starting from 20°C
opening valves (see 7.6.2.3). (68°F)), which is below the AIT of most nonmetals (see Figs. 3 and 4).
Further, even a downstream pressure of only 15 % of the upstream
(1) Use slow-opening compatible bypass valves for pres-
absolute pressure (pressure ratio = 6.7), will probably not generate
sure equalization where applicable (see 7.5.2.3). sufficient temperature to ignite most highly compatible nonmetals such as
(2) Equalize pressure from alternative (including tempo- PTFE (see Figs. 3 and 4) (8).
rary) sources where applicable prior to operating the fast- NOTE 40—Depending upon the sealing mechanism of some ball valves
opening valve (8). and how they are operated, they can isolate the ball bore when closed,
NOTE 39—When a valve is opened, the gas velocity through it is a potentially creating a low-pressure cavity within the bore that can be
maximum initially then decreases as the downstream system pressure rapidly pressurized upon initial opening of the valve, subjecting the
increases. Particle impact is the primary concern and must be addressed at downstream seat to heat of compression (37). Ensure that ball valves are
this time when gas velocities are greatest. As the downstream system specified with features to prevent this.
approaches the upstream pressure, gas temperature downstream ap-
proaches a maximum and ignition of exposed polymers is the primary 7.7.2.5 Avoid pressurization times of less than 1 second
concern that must be addressed. Estimates can be made of the degree of where practical. Longer pressurization times are preferred and
pressure equalization needed to cope with each portion of the hazard (8). may be required for larger piping systems.
NOTE 41—Testing has shown that pressurization rates of less than 1 7.7.2.7 Use larger distance/volume pieces where applicable
second can ignite polymer-lined flexible hoses, even at low pressures (14). for increased protection from compression heating.
Experience indicates that smaller, high-pressure systems, such as those
with an oxygen cylinder source can be especially vulnerable to ignition by NOTE 43—When a system is rapidly pressurized, the initial gas volume
heat of compression. (slug) is compressed and heated. For a constant final pressure, the lower
7.7.2.6 Use “distance/volume pieces” to isolate polymers the initial system pressure, the higher will be the final compressed-slug
from end points that experience heat of compression (25). temperature, and the greater the prospect of exceeding polymer (or
contaminant) autogenous ignition temperatures. However, up to a point
NOTE 42—A distance/volume piece (DVP) is a section of metal, as (estimated at about 31 % of the final absolute pressure (39)), the higher the
shown in Fig. 13, that is used (typically at the end of a flexible initial system pressure, the greater the heat available to transfer to system
polymer-lined hose) to contain the hot compressed-gas slug that can form components, and therefore the greater the chance of exceeding the
during pressurization and to safely absorb its heat of compression. Fig. component’s minimum ignition energy. The critical initial condition
13A and B show DVPs at the ends of hoses downstream from where they relative to these combined factors lies within these extremes and has not
are pressurized. Fig. 14C shows DVPs on both ends of a hose that may be been well studied. Designs should ensure that the initial pressure does not
pressurized from either direction. Several design criteria for these devices
vary greatly from the design pressure to prevent both of these effects.
have been proposed (14, 25, 38). The required size of distance/volume
piece can be calculated by ensuring the compressed volume of gas in the 7.8 Avoid Friction and Galling.
system downstream of the pressurization point is completely contained in
the distance/volume piece. A complimentary computer algorithm4 is 7.8.1 Avoid rubbing components. Components that com-
available from ASTM G04 committee to assist in this calculation based on monly rub include some valve stem and seat assemblies,
two of the strategies that have been proposed (38). packing glands, etc. (10).
--````,,``,,`,`,``````,```,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
FIG. 13 Distance/Volume Pieces (DVPs) on Polymer-Lined Flexible Hoses
7.8.2 Design rotating or reciprocating machinery so that 7.8.5 Ensure periodic maintenance is performed on rubbing,
clearances are adequate and verifiable (64-66). rotating or reciprocating equipment at intervals specified by the
7.8.3 Use burn-resistant materials where friction cannot be manufacturer.
limited. 7.9 Avoid Corrosion.
7.8.4 Use sensors to detect rubs or instabilities in rotating or
reciprocating equipment and, if applicable, to initiate shut NOTE 45—Corrosion prevention is a highly advanced and specialized
down. technology addressed in general by a number of textbooks, college
curricula and professional societies (40, 57). Within ASTM, Committee
NOTE 44—Carefully assess whether to shut down or otherwise respond G01 on Corrosion of Metals publishes a body of standards and sponsors
to anomalous conditions in the operation of high-speed machinery that is manuals and symposia on the subject. Important corrosion issues that are
rotating above its critical speeds. The transition through the critical-speed commonly dealt with by oxygen system designers include the following:
points may worsen rubs and instabilities and be an additional ignition- (1) influence of internal moisture, (2) external corrosion prevention
inducing or fire-aggravating influence. If such anomalous conditions occur through material selection, coatings and both active and passive cathodic
in rotating or recipricating equipment, sensors may also act to shut off the corrosion prevention, (3) stress corrosion cracking, (4) corrosive product
oxygen supply where appropriate. species, and (5) corrosive degradation or combustion species.
NOTE 46—Moisture should be avoided in oxygen systems unless must be taken not to introduce particle impingement sites with these
specifically designed for corrosion resistance (57). A dew point of -40°C design changes.
(-40°F) or lower is preferred for oxygen systems. 7.11 Use Proven Hardware.
7.10 Avoid Resonance. 7.11.1 Use hardware that has a significant trouble-free
history in oxygen service under similar operating conditions.
NOTE 47—Resonance is a highly configuration-dependent phenomena
in which standing (resonant) pressure waves form in relatively stagnant
7.11.2 Pretest components or systems with oxygen in a
regions of a gas system. A detailed description of resonance ignition and controlled environment prior to use.
an example illustration are provided in 5.2.9. NOTE 49—“Techniques Employed by the NASA White Sands Test
Facility to Ensure Oxygen System Component Safety” in STP 812 (26),
7.10.1 Avoid unnecessary blind, open, symmetrical, un-
discusses one procedure for stress-testing of components that has been
swept passages (see Fig. 5). used with the basic apparatus specified for gaseous impact testing in Test
7.10.2 Avoid unintentional sonic gas jets into closed-end Method G 74. An elaboration of one philosophy for this type of testing is
cavities. given in ASTM Manual 36, “Safe Use of Oxygen and Oxygen Systems”
(10). In the case of oxygen regulators for medical applications, a recent
NOTE 48—Studies performed to date on resonance phenomenon indi-
standard, Test Method G 175, provides a consensus validation procedure.
cate that acoustic resonance generally requires internal symmetry and
open flow geometries. Baffles, mufflers, or other system configuration 7.11.3 Ensure the conditions that establish the history of use
changes can prevent resonant conditions from developing. However, care or component testing (that is, pressure, temperature, flow rates,
--````,,``,,`,`,``````,```,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
and flammable materials. 7.15.3 Avoid conditions where molten or powdered alumi-
7.12.3 Use shields, barriers, or safety distance as required to num may form in the presence of palladium or nickel. These
isolate potentially hazardous apparatus (9). combinations can form exothermic intermetallic compounds.
7.12.4 Install fire extinguishment equipment where appli-
cable, to extinguish secondary (and in some cases primary) NOTE 55—Aluminum powders are very reactive and can readily self-
ignite, becoming molten. Palladium in contact with aluminum powder
fires caused by the initial fire in the oxygen system. can, upon ignition, result in an energetic exothermic reaction as the
7.12.5 Install fire-break sections in pipelines, tubing runs, palladium alloys with the aluminum to produce an intermetallic compound
equipment, etc. Use burn-resistant materials or changes in flow (such as palladium aluminides) with a net release of heat. Nickel can also
direction, such as elbows, to enhance fire-break performance form intermetallic compounds with aluminum powder (such as nickel
where practical. aluminides) (20). Bifilar palladium and aluminum wire with electrical
7.13 Anticipate Indirect Oxygen Exposure. stimulation is a frequently used ignition source for experimental materials
flammability testing in oxygen.
7.13.1 Discharge vents to areas capable of dissipating the
oxygen or resisting ignition, and direct vents above and away 7.15.4 Avoid conditions where metal hydrides contact oxy-
from personnel. gen without a sufficient heat sink.
7.13.2 Evaluate the effects of leaks or releases on surround- NOTE 56—The hydrogen in metal hydrides can react with oxygen
ing areas and equipment. For example, avoid cryogens on exothermically, sometimes spontaneously, upon first contact. Common
carbonaceous surfaces (see 5.2.12). practice is to use palladium oxide to getter hydrogen in the vacuum jackets
7.13.3 Anticipate that mechanical failures, such as leaks of liquid oxygen vessels. Incidents have occurred where failure of the
through control valve seats, may result in an oxygen exposure vacuum space produced spontaneous reactions of the gettered hydrogen
exceeding system design limits. when oxygen leaked into the vacuum space. Some of these incidents may
7.14 Minimize Available Fuel/Oxygen (29). have involved the formation of palladium hydrides at some stage of the
getter lifetime. Subsequent testing has shown that wrapping the palladium
7.14.1 Shield and minimize the size of all system nonmet- oxide with a properly-designed heat sink that contains the palladium oxide
als, especially primary seals and seats (10). can reduce the hazard. This approach is being successfully used through-
NOTE 51—Most nonmetals will support burning in near-100 % oxygen out industry. Further, stable hydrides may not be as reactive in oxygen.
concentrations at just slightly elevated oxygen pressures. They are also 7.15.5 Avoid conditions where burning metals contact liq-
more easily ignited than metals and generally exhibit larger heats of uids.
combustion when they burn (see 7.21.3). Thus, nonmetals are generally
considered the most vulnerable parts in oxygen system components and as NOTE 57—Contact of hot molten and/or burning metals with liquids can
such should be minimized and protected from potential ignition mecha- lead to “steam” explosions (20) or even more severe reactive explosions,
nisms. either of which can be particularly destructive. Very reactive metals, such
as aluminum, have produced severe reactions when burned under or
7.14.2 Minimize the internal volume of components to spilled into liquid oxygen (LOX), and even when abruptly combined with
reduce the oxygen they contain. water (20). In some cases, the reaction can be more destructive than TNT
7.15 Avoid Potentially Exothermic Material Combinations. (43).
NOTE 52—Exothermic material combinations are generally most severe 7.16 Anticipate Common Failure-Mechanism Conse-
as finely-divided geometries such as metal powders, dust or fine particu- quences.
lates, which may be generated by metal fabrication processes, wear, and 7.16.1 Avoid unintended exposure to oxygen. Materials not
corrosion processes. Poor cleaning practices may aggravate the potential
hazard.
intended to be exposed to oxygen may not be compatible with
oxygen and ignition mechanisms may be present.
7.15.1 Avoid chlorine-containing lubricants on aluminum in 7.16.1.1 Spillage of LOX onto porous materials (wood,
high-stress load applications. asphalt, macadam, etc.) can produce an easily ignited explo-
NOTE 53—Testing and experience has shown that aluminum and sion hazard (see 5.2.13.3).
lubricants containing chlorine components (for example CTFE) can react 7.16.2 Use redundant safeguards where secondary hazards
violently under increased mechanical stress due to exothermic aluminum- are present.
--````,,``,,`,`,``````,```,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
other circuit. If both leak and contact, it is at the low risk with system conditions (pressure, temperature, gas velocity, etc.). Thus,
atmospheric pressure condition. increasing thickness to reduce flammability may not necessarily be
(3) Fig. 14, Part C shows the most conservative system in reliable.
NOTE 62—Exterior corrosion creating thin sections on piping can
which the vulnerable press-fits have been eliminated and reduce both the pressure rating and oxygen compatibility of the pipe. For
leakage between the circuits must breach two contiguous example, an oxygen fire internal to piping is more likely to burn through
physical walls. In this case, as well as Case B, a tertiary a thin section of corroded pipe (especially at an elbow, Tee, or other
safeguard could be applied by maintaining the oxygen pressure impingement point).
above the coolant pressure to minimize the effect of the most 7.17.2.3 Remove sharp edges and burrs exposed to oxygen
hazardous leakage path. because they are more easily ignited than bulkier base materi-
7.17 Avoid High Surface-Area-to-Volume (S/V) Conditions als.
where Practical—High S/V conditions include mesh screens,
powders, granules, open-cell foams and sponges, thin fins, NOTE 63—Burrs are also easily broken off in systems and can become
undesired contaminant or potential particle impact ignition hazards.
sharp edges, points, sintered filters, etc.
7.17.3 Avoid intimate contact configurations of oxygen with
NOTE 59—The hazards of fires in oxygen increase with the amount of
flammable materials.
exposed surface area, and the speed and extent to which a material is
heated increases as the mass of the material absorbing the heat is NOTE 64—Many of the hazards of oxygen fires increase with the degree
decreased. Therefore objects that expose a lot of surface area with minimal of intimacy of oxygen with flammable (that is, “reactive”) materials.
associated mass tend to be more flammable (more easily ignited, faster Intimate configurations are those where the quantity of oxygen in close
burning, etc.) than objects with small reaction surfaces and large masses proximity with flammable materials is large. This produces the ability for
(heat sinks) to absorb heat. Further, high S/V geometries can be difficult a large quantity of oxygen to rapidly combine with the fuels, even at
to sufficiently clean for oxygen service and often require special treatment. explosive speed, as opposed to slower combustion in which vaporization,
Table 3 (47) shows the wide range of S/V properties of many common diffusion and other mass transport must occur for the oxygen to react. As
shapes. a result, ignition is easier, rate of reaction is greater, peak temperatures and
pressure during a fire are increased.
7.17.1 Use burn-resistant materials for high S/V configura- NOTE 65—Solutions and some mixtures of oxygen do not exhibit a
tions. The higher the surface-area-to-volume, the more critical clearly defined surface area, but as with high S/V geometries, they have
is the use of burn-resistant materials. In the most extreme large numbers of oxygen molecules in close proximity with reactive
cases, such as powders, even the most highly burn-resistant of material molecules and can yield rapid or even explosive reactions. Some
common engineering metals may be too flammable for any of these configurations can be difficult to identify but include porous
practical use. closed-cell materials into which oxygen may diffuse, materials with a high
solubility for oxygen (including miscible gas/gas and liquid/liquid mix-
NOTE 60—Mesh screens of nickel and sintered element filters of brass tures), molecular sieves containing both oxygen and hydrocarbon adsor-
or tin bronze have been shown to be burn-resistant and therefore preferred bates (that is, activated charcoal), “char” products from incomplete
7.19.5.3 Prevent cross-piping. interlocks, flow logic, ganged tions around nonmetals. These configurations can include
valves, automated systems, and double-block-and-bleed piping external leaks past elastomeric pressure seals or internal flows
can all be used to prevent cross-piping. on or close to plastic seats in components.
7.19.5.4 Use caution with check valves intended to prevent NOTE 77—Flow friction has not been shown to be a credible ignition
cross-contamination by oxygen. source for metals (see 5.2.12).
NOTE 76—The use of check valves to exclude oxygen from selected 7.20.1.1 Ensure that redundant O-ring seals can contain
regions of systems must be done with extra care if a reliable block is reverse pressure between them. O-ring seals are sometimes
crucial. Most check valves are not designed as absolute shut off valves. As
redundant, creating a chamber between the seals that can retain
such, many check-valve designs do not provide reliable or complete
blockage against reverse flows. Others will not seal against small reverse pressure when the system is vented. O-rings not designed to
differential pressures. Where exposed to contamination or process liquids, contain reverse pressure may be forced out of their grooves or
deposits may prevent their closure. Thus, other methods, such as auto- become damaged, producing loose slivers of elastomer.
matic or manual block valves, or redundant or double check valves, are 7.20.1.2 Ensure that polymers that can absorb oxygen do
used to provide a more reliable block than single check valves, especially not expand and “push out” from their grooves. Porous poly-
in applications where preventing cross-contamination is critical. mers, especially some fluorocarbon rubbers, when exposed to
7.20 Avoid Designs and Failure Scenarios that can Intro- oxygen under pressure for long periods, can become permeated
duce Potential Flow Friction Ignition Hazards. with oxygen, potentially increasing their flammability. Upon
7.20.1 Avoid leaks past nonmetallic component seats or venting they may expand to sizes significantly larger than
pressure seals, or “weeping” or “scrubbing” flow configura- normal. Polymers exposed to other gases (especially carbon
--````,,``,,`,`,``````,```,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
(1) Forsyth, E. T., Newton, B. E., Rantala, J., and Hirschfeld, T., “Using spheres: Ninth Volume, ASTM STP 1395, T. A. Steinberg, B. E.
ASTM Standard Guide G 88 to Identify and Rank System-Level Newton, and H. D. Beeson, Eds., American Society for Testing and
Hazards in Large-Scale Oxygen Systems,” Flammability and Sensi- Materials, West Conshohocken, PA, 2000.
tivity of Materials in Oxygen-Enriched Atmospheres: Tenth Volume, (14) Janoff, D., Bamford, L. J., Newton, B. E., and Bryan, C. J., “Ignition
ASTM STP 1454, T. A. Steinberg, H. D. Beeson, and B. E. Newton, of PTFE-Lined Flexible Hoses by Rapid Pressurization with Oxy-
Eds., ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2003. gen,” Flammability and Sensitivity of Materials in Oxygen-Enriched
(2) Hirsch, D. B., Bunker, R. L., and Janoff, D., “Effects of Oxygen Atmospheres: Fourth Volume, ASTM SPT 1040, Joel M. Stoltzfus,
Concentration, Diluents, and Pressure on Ignition and Flame-Spread Frank J. Benz, and Jack S. Stradling editors, American Society for
Rates of Nonmetals,” Flammability and Sensitivity of Materials in Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, 1989.
Oxygen-Enriched Atmospheres: Fifth Volume, ASTM STP 1111, Joel (15) Benz, F. J., and Stoltzfus, J. M., “Ignition of Metals and Alloys in
M. Stoltzfus and Kenneth McIlroy, Eds., American Society for Testing Gaseous Oxygen By Frictional Heating,” Flammability and Sensitiv-
and Materials, Philadelphia, 1991. ity of Materials in Oxygen-Enriched Atmospheres: Second Volume,
(3) Bryan, C. J. and Lowrie, R.,“Comparative Results of Autogenous ASTM STP 910, M. A. Benning, Ed., American Society for Testing
Ignition Temperature Measurements by ASTM G 72 and Pressurized and Materials, Philadelphia, 1986, pp. 38-58.
--````,,``,,`,`,``````,```,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
Scanning Calorimetry in Gaseous Oxygen,” Flammability and Sensi- (16) Phillips, B. R. and DeWitt, K. J., “Resonance Tube Ignition of
tivity of Materials in Oxygen-Enriched Atmospheres: Second Volume, Aluminum,” Combustion and Flame, 35, 1979, pp. 249-258.
ASTM STP 910, M. A. Benning, Ed., American Society for Testing and (17) Niwa, M., Santana, A. Jr., and Kessaev, K., “Development of a
Materials, Philadelphia, 1986, pp. 108-117. Resonance Igniter for GO2/Kerosene Ignition,” Journal of Propul-
(4) Benz, F. J., Shaw, R. C., and Homa, J. M., “Burn Propagation Rates of sion and Power, Vol 17, No. 5, September-October, 2001, pp.
Metals and Alloys in Gaseous Oxygen,” Flammability and Sensitivity 995-997.
of Materials in Oxygen-Enriched Atmospheres: Second Volume, ASTM (18) Waller, J. M., Newton, B. E., Beeson, H. D., and Haas, J. P.,
STP 910, M. A. Benning, Ed., American Society for Testing and “Comparison of the Dimensional Stability of Kel-F 81 and Neoflon
Materials, Philadelphia, 1986, pp. 135-152. CTFE M400H Polychlorotrifluoroethylenes Used in Valve Seat
(5) Benning, M. A., “Measurement of Oxygen Index at Elevated Pres- Applications,” Flammability and Sensitivity of Materials in Oxygen-
sures,” Flammability and Sensitivity of Materials in Oxygen-Enriched Enriched Atmospheres: Ninth Volume, ASTM STP 1395, T. A.
Atmospheres, ASTM STP 812, B. L. Werley, Ed., American Society for Steinberg, B. E. Newton, and H. D. Beeson, Eds., American Society
Testing and Materials, 1983, pp. 68-83. for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA, 2000.
(6) Benning, M. A., Zabrenski, J. S., and Le, N. B., “The Flammability of (19) Bryan, C. J., “NASA Mechanical Impact Testing in High-Pressure
Aluminum Alloys and Aluminum Bronzes as Measured by Pressurized Oxygen,” Flammability and Sensitivity of Materials in Oxygen-
Oxygen Index,” Flammability and Sensitivity of Materials in Oxygen- Enriched Atmospheres, ASTM STP 812, B. L. Werley, Ed., American
Enriched Atmospheres, ASTM STP 986, D. W. Schroll, Ed., American Society for Testing and Materials, 1983, pp. 9-42.
Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, 1988, pp. 54-71. (20) Werley, B. L., Barthelemy, H., Gates, R., Slusser, J. W., Wilson, K.
(7) Benz, F. J., Williams, R. E., and Armstrong, D., “Ignition of Metals B., and Zawierucha, R., “A Critical Review of Flammability Data for
and Alloys By High-Velocity Particles,” Flammability and Sensitivity Aluminum,” Flammability and Sensitivity of Materials in Oxygen-
of Materials in Oxygen- Enriched Atmospheres: Second Volume, Enriched Atmospheres: Sixth Volume, ASTM STP 1197, Dwight D.
ASTM STP 910, M. A. Benning, Ed., American Society for Testing and Janoff and Joel M. Stoltzfus, Eds., American Society for Testing and
Materials, Philadelphia, 1986, pp. 16-37. Materials, Philadelphia, 1993.
(8) Castillo, D. G., and Werley, B. L., “Eliminating Bypass Valves in (21) Reed, R. P., Simon, N. J., and Berger, J. R., “Influence of Specimen-
Selected Oxygen Systems,” Flammability and Sensitivity of Materials Absorbed Energy in LOX Mechanical- Impact Tests,” Flammability
in Oxygen-Enriched Atmospheres: Eighth Volume, ASTM STP 1319, and Sensitivity of Materials in Oxygen-Enriched Atmospheres, Fifth
W. T. Royals, T. C. Chou, and T. A. Steinberg, Eds., American Society Volume, ASTM STP 1111, Joel M. Stoltzfus and Kenneth McIlroy,
for Testing and Materials, 1997. Eds., American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, 1991.
(9) CGA G-4.4-2003 (4th Edition)/IGC doc 13/02, Oxygen Pipeline (22) Monroe, R. W., Bates, C. E., and Pears, C. D., “Metal Combustion in
Systems, Compressed Gas Association, Inc., Chantilly, VA, European High-Pressure Flowing Oxygen,” Flammability and Sensitivity of
Industrial Gases Association , Brussels. Materials in Oxygen-Enriched Atmospheres, ASTM STP 812, B. L.
(10) Beeson, H. D., Stewart, W. F., and Woods, S. S., Safe Use of Oxygen Werley, Ed., American Society for Testing and Materials, 1983, pp.
and Oxygen Systems: Guidelines for Oxygen System Design, Mate- 126-149.
rials Selection, Operations, Storage, and Transportation, ASTM (23) NASA, Flammability, Odor, Offgassing and Compatibility Require-
Manual 36, ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West ments and Test Procedures for Materials in Environments that
Conshohocken, PA, 19428-1959, 2000, 99 pages. Support Combustion, NASA STD-6001, Marshall Space Flight Cen-
(11) Williams, R. E., Benz, F. J., and McIlroy, K., “Ignition of Steel Alloys ter, Huntsville, AL, February 9, 1998.
by Impact of Low-Velocity Iron/Inert Particles in Gaseous Oxygen,” (24) CGA Pamphlet G-4.1, “Cleaning Equipment for Oxygen Service,”
Flammability and Sensitivity of Materials in Oxygen-Enriched Atmo- Compressed Gas Association, Arlington, VA.
spheres, ASTM STP 986, D. W. Schroll, Ed., American Society for (25) Barthelemy, H., and Vagnard, G., “Ignition of PTFE-lined Hoses in
Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, 1988, pp. 72-84. High-Pressure Oxygen Systems: Test Results and Consideration for
(12) Dees, J., Forsyth, E., Gunaji, M. V., and Stoltzfus, J. M., “An Safe Design and Use,” Flammability and Sensitivity of Materials in
Evaluation of Polymers as Ignition Sources During Particle Impact in Oxygen Enriched Atmospheres, Vol 3, ASTM STP 986, 1988, pp.
Oxygen,” Flammability and Sensitivity of Materials in Oxygen- 289-309.
Enriched Atmospheres: Seventh Volume, ASTMSTP 1267, Dwight D. (26) Stradling, J. S., Pippen, D. L., and Frye, G. W., “Techniques
Janoff, William T. Royals, and Mohan V. Gunaji, Eds., American Employed by the NASA White Sands Test Facility to Ensure Oxygen
Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, 1995, pp. System Component Safety,” Flammability and Sensitivity of Materi-
143-151. als in Oxygen Enriched Atmospheres, ASTM STP 812, 1983, pp.
(13) Forsyth, E. T., Gallus, T. D., and Stoltzfus, J. M., “Ignition Resistance 97-107.
of Polymeric Materials to Particle Impact in High-Pressure Oxygen,” (27) CGA Pamphlet G-4.0, “Oxygen,” Compressed Gas Association,
Flammability and Sensitivity of Materials in Oxygen-Enriched Atmo- Arlington, VA.
(44) Kinney, G. F., and Graham, K. J., Explosive Shocks in Air, Second 5th Floor, Chantilly, VA 20151.
Edition, Springer Verlag, New York, 1985. (62) CGA G-4.9, “Safe Use of Brazed Aluminum Heat Exchangers for
(45) Grelecki, C., Fundamentals of Fire and Explosion Hazards Evalua- Producing Pressurized Oxygen,” Compressed Gas Association, Inc.,
tion, AIChE Today Series, American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 4221 Walney Road, 5th Floor, Chantilly, VA 20151.
New York, 1972, pp. A-8 to A-10. (63) NASA Technical Memorandum 104823, “Guide for Oxygen Hazards
(46) Personal communication with Werley, B. L., ref to presentation from Analyses on Components and Systems,” Joel M. Stoltzfus, Jesse
Werley, B.L., Hansel, J. G., and Buchter, W. C., “TNT-Equivalency Dees, Robert F. Poe, October 1996.
ASTM International takes no position respecting the validity of any patent rights asserted in connection with any item mentioned
in this standard. Users of this standard are expressly advised that determination of the validity of any such patent rights, and the risk
of infringement of such rights, are entirely their own responsibility.
This standard is subject to revision at any time by the responsible technical committee and must be reviewed every five years and
if not revised, either reapproved or withdrawn. Your comments are invited either for revision of this standard or for additional standards
and should be addressed to ASTM International Headquarters. Your comments will receive careful consideration at a meeting of the
responsible technical committee, which you may attend. If you feel that your comments have not received a fair hearing you should
make your views known to the ASTM Committee on Standards, at the address shown below.
This standard is copyrighted by ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959,
United States. Individual reprints (single or multiple copies) of this standard may be obtained by contacting ASTM at the above
address or at 610-832-9585 (phone), 610-832-9555 (fax), or service@astm.org (e-mail); or through the ASTM website
(www.astm.org).
--````,,``,,`,`,``````,```,,`-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---