Fotippopcycle 2019
Fotippopcycle 2019
Fotippopcycle 2019
POP Cycle, Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program (FOTIP), 2017. Adapted from CSU Fullerton Titan EDUCATOR Project, 2017. Page 3 of 5
● In what ways were students prefer? How could you create a math problem that could be solved between them”). Groups then selected a strategy and created comparison/contrast was the most common analysis question. I
engaged? with this strategy?”) two math problems to exchange tomorrow. need to give them a Bloom’s question stems handout next time.
CSTP 3: Organizing
Subject Matter When students expressed an idea, I
● What actions of the NT Although I did not see the teacher
contributed to student prompted them with more things to
It appears information provided to clear up any misconceptions as I
assimilation of subject consider to deepen their
matter? students by Ms. Perry in a pior lesson watched the video it seemed like
● How did students understanding. Students also took
construct knowledge of gave context for the student's the students themselves clarified
subject matter? ownership of the subject matter by
● What misconceptions did
discussion. the answers among themselves
being active participants in their
students have and how through a lively discussion
were they addressed by role.
the teacher?
POP Cycle, Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program (FOTIP), 2017. Adapted from CSU Fullerton Titan EDUCATOR Project, 2017. Page 4 of 5
evaluating the code itself, then discussing how it changed life in Mesopotamia, and lastly how laws impact us
today.
Focus Student 1: English Learner Focus Student 2: Student w/ILP/504 Focus Student 3: Your Choice
I was able to review with her after Being in the group setting helped
To what degree did focus He was able to discuss the to ensure her understanding. Her her understand what they were
students achieve lesson information in his group and with role in the group was time keeper doing in the discussion and
objectives?
some prompting he was able to so she could focus on listening to hearing other students' thoughts
deepen his understanding. the content, but her understanding helped her clarify her own. She
could be deeper. was able to meet the objective.
I would have assigned the groups and explained the roles ahead of time so that students had more time to
discuss and process at the end. It wasn’t rushed at the end, but it would have been nice to have more synthesis
time, especially if I would have been able to help them visualize the information with the Venn Diagram. That, or
What would you do differently
next time? choose one of the longer class periods to do the discussion. I would have also added additional sentence stems
for my focus students to further scaffold their discussion. Students were also fixated on just one of the laws in
the Code and so I would encourage them ahead of time to discuss many of the laws and the Code as a whole,
not individual laws.
What were three top Lesson
Strengths? Organization, engagement, knowledge of students
Continue to reinforce the concept for the rest of the unit and help them further apply what they’ve discussed to
What are next steps?
real world contexts through their Flipgrid discussion. Provide more opportunities for students to apply what
they’ve learned from ancient history to modern times in subsequent units, such as social class in India, civil
service tests in China, and democracy in Greece.
Other Comments/Notes
A good lesson that kept students engaged. A good topic in which to center the discussion around because it was relevant and interesting
to students.
All parts of this form should be transcribed (typed; not hand-written) into a single document and submitted to course instructor.
Information from this POP Cycle should be summarized on the NT ILP as appropriate.
POP Cycle, Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program (FOTIP), 2017. Adapted from CSU Fullerton Titan EDUCATOR Project, 2017. Page 5 of 5