Bedru Merhaba PDF

A Study of Construction Defects in Federal Government Office Building Projects in Addis Ababa
Addis Ababa University

Addis Ababa Institute of Technology
Study of Construction Defects in Public Building Projects in Addis Ababa
(A Case study of Federal Government Office Building Projects)
By Bedru Merhaba
APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF EXAMINERS
Name Signature Date
Dr. Girmay Kassay ___________________ ____________

ADVISOR
Dr. Ephraim Senbetta ___________________ ____________

EXAMINER (INTERNAL)
Eng. Yebeltal Zewedu ___________________ ____________

EXAMINER (EXTERNAL)
Ato Samson Walelgn ___________________ ____________

CHAIRMAN
Msc Thesis, Cotm, AAiT, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering Page 1
Declaration
I declare that this thesis entitled “A Study of Construction Defects in Public Building
Projects; A Case Study of Federal Government Office Building Projects in Addis Ababa” is
my original work. This thesis has not been presented for any other university and is not
concurrently submitted in candidature of any other degree, and that all sources of material used
for the thesis have been duly acknowledged.
Candidate:
Name: _______________________
Signature: ____________________
Acknowledgements
First of all I would like to thank the Almighty God, Who gave me the commitment and tolerance
to pass various obstacles and come up to the accomplishment of this thesis.
I would like to express my gratitude to all those who gave me the possibility to complete this
thesis. I am expressing my deepest appreciation and thanks to my advisor, Dr. Girmay Kassay,
for his valuable advice, invaluable suggestions, timely comments, and thorough guidance
throughout the work of this thesis.
I would like to express my appreciation to all organizations and individuals who contributed
directly or indirectly to this thesis and provided the necessary materials and support for
realization of this thesis. Especial thanks are forwarded to contractors, consultants and client who
sacrificed their time in filling the questionnaires.
I would also like to use this opportunity to convey my gratitude to my friends. Without their
support and encouragement I couldn‟t have this opportunity to complete my study. I also
gratefully acknowledge the contributions of all those individuals who had contributed in one way
or the other in the realization of this paper.
Finally I would like to give my special thanks for my parents and wife whose patience and love
enabled me to complete this work.
Table of content
Acknowledgements...…………………………………………………………………….….…....iii
Table of contents……………………………………………………………………………...…..iv
List of tables……………………………………………………………………………………...vii
List of figures..........................................................................................................................…..viii
Abstract……………………………………………………………………………………….......ix
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1. General………………………………………………………………………………….…1
1.2. Statement of problem...……………………………………………………………………2
1.3. Objectives of the study....…………………………………………………………………3
1.4. Importance of the study…..……………………………………………………………….3
1.5. Scope of the study….……….……………………………………………………………..3
1.6. Limitation of the study……………………………………………...……………………..3
2. LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1. Introduction…..……….……………………….………………………………………….4
2.1.1. Extent of defects……………………………………………………………………….4
2.1.2. Defect and Failure...……………………………………………………………………5
2.1.3. Defect & Deterioration…………………………………………………………………7
2.1.4. Investigation……………………………………………………………………………7
2.2. Types and Causes of construction defects.....…….………………………………………9
2.2.1. Dampness.…………...…………………………………………….…………………..12
2.2.2. Foundation defect...…………………………………………………………………...14
2.2.2.1. Subsidence & Settlement………..……………………………………………….14
2.2.2.2. Tree root problem...……………………...……………………………...………..15
2.2.3. Floor defect……………………………………………………………………………16
2.2.4. Wall defect…………………………………...…………………………………….....17
2.2.5. Door & Window defect………………………………...……………………………..18
2.2.6. Roof defect……………………………………………………………………………19
2.2.7. Cladding defect………………………………………………………………………..20
2.2.8. Plastering & Rendering defects….……………………………………………………21
2.2.9. Ceiling Defects………………………………………………...……………………...22

2.2.10. Building Services defect………………………………………………………………23
2.2.10.1. Plumbing & drainage……………………………………………………….........23
2.2.10.2. Electricity Supply………………………………………..……………………….23
2.3. Summary of Causes of Construction defect…………………………….……………….24
2.3.1. Design error…………………………………………………………..……………….24
2.3.2. Workmanship error………………………………………………..………………….24
2.3.3. Defective material………………………………………………….…………………25
2.3.4. Subsurface Related……………………………………………………………………25
2.4. Effects of Construction Defect………………………………………….……......………26
2.5. Failure Pattern & Control……………………………………………….………………..26
2.5.1. Visible building defect….………………………………………………………….....27
2.6. Reducing Building Defect………………………………………………………………..28
2.6.1. Pre-construction stage…………………………………………….…………………. 29
2.6.2. During construction……………………………………………...……………………30
2.6.3. Post construction stage…………………………………………….………………….31
2.7. Summary of literature review……………………………………………...…………….31
3. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
3.1. Introduction ………………………………..…………………………………………….34
3.2. Research design …………….………………………...….………………………………34
3.3. Thesis structure………………………………………………………………….……….36
3.4. Data collection ……………………………………..……………………………………36
3.5. Sampling method ……………………………………..…………………………………37
3.6. Questionnaire used in the research ...……………………………………………………37
3.6.1. Questionnaire approach…………………………….……..…………………………..39
3.6.2. Questionnaire design …………………………………………………………………39
3.6.3. Respondent profile………………………………………...………………………….40
3.6.4. Types and causes of construction defect ………………………...………………….. 40
3.6.5. Effects of construction defect …………………………………...……………………40
3.6.6. Construction defect reducing measures……………………...……………………......40
3.7. Respondent attitude measurement……………………………………………………….41
3.8. Analysis and Interpretation ……………………………………………………..……….41
4. ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION

4.1. Introduction ………………………………..…………………………………………….42
4.2. Result and analysis of the case study ………………...……………………….…………42
4.3. Results of Questionnaire Analysis……………………………………………….………57
4.3.1. Population characteristics…………………………………………………………..…57
4.3.1.1. Type of respondent‟s organization ………………………………………………57
4.3.1.2. Respondents job positions ……………………………………………………….58
4.3.2. Types and causes of construction defect ………………………..……………………58
4.3.2.1. Clients‟ view ………………………………………………….…………………58
4.3.2.2. Consultants‟ view ……………………………………………..…………………59
4.3.2.3. Contractors‟ view ……………………………………………..…………………62
4.3.3. Effects of construction defects …………………………………….…………………64
4.3.4. Defect reducing measures …………………………………….…………...…………65
4.3.5. Tests for agreements on types, effects and reducing procedures of construction defect
among stakeholders in the construction industry …………………….....……………67
4.4. Comparison between case study & survey analysis result …………………..…………70
5. CONCLUSION AND RECCOMENDATION

5.1. Conclusion ………………………………..………………………………….………….72
5.2. Recommendations ………………………………………………………………….……73
6. REFERENCES …………………………………………………………………….………75
7. APPENDIES
7.1. Appendix A: Profile of selected project ……………………………………………...….78
7.2. Appendix B: Questionnaire…………………………………………………………………….82
7.3. Appendix C: Spearman‟s rank table‟ .…………………………………………………...91
Lists of Tables
Table 2.1: Common defective plaster rendering & causes.

Table 2.2: Ceiling defects & causes
Table 2.3: Common building defect and their symptoms
Table 2.4: Causes and symptoms of common defects in building services
Table 2.5: Water leakages and their causes
Table 3.1: List of investigated projects
Table 3.2.: Scales that represent level of agreement
Table 3.3: Scales that represent level importance
Table 4.1: Summary of construction defect from case study
Table 4.2: List of construction defect on case study project
Table 4.3: Respondent organization
Table 4.4: Respondent job position
Table 4.5: Types of defect from client & end users, consultant & contractor point of
view
Table 4.6: Causes of defect from client & end users, consultant & contractor point of
view
Table 4.7: Effects of defect from client & end users, consultant & contractor point of
view
Table 4.8: Building defect reducing measure from client & end users, consultant
and contractor point of view
Table 4.9: Summary of correlation test on the ranking of types of construction defects
Table 4.10: Summary of correlation test on the ranking of effects of construction defects
Table 4.11: Summary of correlation test on the ranking of defect reducing measures
Lists of Figures
Figure 4.1: Typical sewerage line

Figure 4.2: Sludge drains to the surface
Figure 4.3: Loosen floor tile
Figure 4.4: Fallen ceramic wall tile
Figure 4.5: Lift case filled with water
Figure 4.6: Defective floor drain
Figure 4.7: Dust accumulated at gutter opening
Figure 4.8: Fractured water proofing membrane
Figure 4.9: Ceiling leakage
Figure 4.10: Roof slab leakage
Figure 4.11: Questionnaire distributed
Figure 4.12: Questionnaire response rate
Figure 4.13: Causes of construction defects
Abstract
Construction defect is a shortcoming in the function, performance, statutory or user requirements
of a building, and might manifest itself within the structure, materials, services or other facilities
of the affected building. Most construction defects are avoidable; they occur, in general, not
through a lack of basic knowledge but by non-application or misapplication of it. Occurrence of
construction defect can decrease and affect the value of the buildings. A number of buildings in
Addis Ababa are suffering construction defects. Therefore, this research tried to investigate the
most frequent types of construction defects in Federal Government Office Building Projects in
Addis Ababa next to that possible causes of construction defects were addressed. At the end
effects of construction defects and defect reducing measures were investigated.
Questionnaire surveys together with case study were used to collect data on construction defect
parameters. A total of 30 questionnaires from client & end users, consultants and contractors
were collected and a case study of 7 building construction projects in Addis Ababa was
investigated. From the results it was found a total of 55 types of construction defect and 4
common causes of construction defects were recorded. The first three most frequent types of
construction defects were; broken or loose tiles on floors or wall; water seepage from external
wall, roof, or from ceiling; broken or leaking sanitary fixtures. Similarly the results showed that
the most common cause of construction defect was poor workmanship. 58% of construction
defect were attributed to poor workmanship. Defective material takes the next role by causing
20% of construction defects. Deign error causes 15% of construction defects and the remaining
defects were caused by poor subsurface investigation and improper usage of building.
This research recorded a total of 8 effects of construction defect and project delay ranked as the
first effect of construction defects. The next effect was construction cost overrun. The analysis
ranked high maintenance cost as the 3rd effects of construction defects. Also the research found a
total of 13 construction defect reducing measure and among them periodic and regular
construction site supervision was the most important measure to decrease occurrence of
construction defect. The next important measure was implementing a comprehensive quality
control mechanism. Concurrently coordinating all building systems, starting with the planning
phase and continuing into the programming and implementation phases was the third important
measures
Chapter One: Introduction

1.1. General
A construction defect is the shortcoming of the building, structure or components to be erected in
a reasonably workman-like manner or to perform in the manner intended by the manufacturer or
reasonably or expected by the buyer, which probably causes damage to the structure. Now a days
construction defects become common and often arising or seen in the construction project,
especially in the project which has poor management or supervision in the construction site.
Construction defect can be known as a problem in the construction industry that could cause the
value of a building decrease eventually. Those defects incur a big cost & it is defined as the
value of resource consumption for rework as a consequence of a defect. Work time, materials
and equipment time are consumed to correct the defect. Time is lost in waiting as a consequence
of a defect. The cost is calculated irrespective of who pays.
The causes of these construction defects are either because of poor design, or low quality
workmanship, or because the building was not constructed according to the design, or because it
has been subject to factors not allowed for in the design or poor supervision. These primary
causes suspected to be the causes of construction defects in building projects of Addis Ababa and
might also operate singly or in combination and result in defects indicated by changes in
composition of materials; in the construction itself; in the size, shape or weight of materials; or
simply in appearances.
Construction defect can decrease and affect the value of the buildings. Defects are developments
in construction that reduces the project`s value instead of adding to it. Other than reduces the
project value, where the construction defect is apparent, it also can cause the project to delay
which means not complete with in the period stated in the contract. Cost overrun can be known
as one of the effect when the construction defects happen in the construction site. Construction
defect will also affect society at large due to possible danger posed and result in direct and
indirect cost in repairs, abnormally high maintenance dispute and possible loss of building.
Only few previous studies have been dedicated to finding out the genesis of these construction
defects in construction projects. These studies have been identified with the building industry as
well as general engineering practices. A major factor necessitating construction defects are
attributable to poor design, or low quality workmanship, or because the building was not
constructed according to the design, or because it has been subject to factors not allowed for in
the design or poor supervision.
It is difficult to get researches which were done on effects of construction defects on building
construction projects in Addis Ababa. But from foreign researches the consequences of
construction defects on building projects resulted into a substantial increment in amount of
funding budgeted for construction works and are responsible most cases of inability to complete
and hand over project works as agreed initially at the commencement of the work. Also,
increment in the project cost and an extended duration of completion are the two main effects
observed for defects by not forgetting its adverse effect on society at large due to possible danger
posed, abnormally high maintenance dispute and possible loss of structure.
Sometimes there are issues of construction defects, tenants relate to the quality of building, on
public building projects around Addis Ababa and it became headlines in newspaper and
electronic media and majority of defects were latent. Even if it was given attentions on media, it
occurs again and again on building projects of the city. This is may be because of no scientific
research done on this issue so far, so it is wise to do scientific research in this area.
So, the focus of this research was to investigate different types of construction defects in general
and causes & effects of construction defects in particular and finally providing procedures which
can reduce their occurrence.
1.2. Statement of problem
Construction defect in construction project is inevitable in building projects of Addis Ababa.
Construction defects can be arising due to inadequate design, poor workmanships in the
construction and lack of maintenance. The defects that in the construction project can become
worst due to the reason of invisible defect that not detected by the builder or the occupants.
Construction defect might affect the appearance of the building, health and safety of the
occupant, construction industry of a country, reputation and etc. Thus, this problem can make
occupant unhappy eventually. Obviously, these defects are reasons for delay, claim, disputes and
are responsible for a significant construction cost raise and are common in these projects. Report
at Federal Government Office Building Project Office shows construction defect can cause up to
10% time overrun and 2% project cost overrun.
1.3. Objective of the study

The objectives of this research were;
 To assess the extent of construction defects in building projects

 To investigate types and causes of construction defects in Federal Government Office
Building Projects in Addis Ababa
 To investigate effects of construction defects in Federal Government Office Building
Projects in Addis Ababa, and
 To provide measures that can reduce construction defects in public building projects.
1.4. Importance of the study
This research will have benefits to prevent construction defects that will occur in building
projects of Addis Ababa. Thus, this thesis studied type, causes, effects and the methods to reduce
the construction defects. Besides that, this study can also enhance the knowledge of the builders
or any participants involved in the construction in order to increase the quality of the buildings.
1.5. Scope of the study

This research investigated different types, causes, effects of construction defects in Public
building projects and at the end tried to forward construction defect reducing measures in
building projects. The research was conducted from September, 2014 – December, 2015.
Samples were taken from Federal Government Office Building Projects in Addis Ababa. The
nature of study used is questionnaire and case study.
1.6. Limitation of the study

The issue of construction defect is vast. Even, the case project requires studies that are more
intensive than what is presented. The reluctance of some of the stakeholder to give information
during interview and desk study, unavailability of written literatures in Ethiopian context, the
limited time and finance for preparing this thesis have also great bearing in limiting the scope of
this study. Even though the thesis is limited, it is believed that such diagnostic approach on the
study of construction defect in building projects will contribute to reduce construction defect in
building projects of the country.
Chapter Two: Literature Review

2.1. Introduction
2.1.1. Extent of defect
In the building industry, words like „error‟, „fault‟, „failure‟, „defect‟, „quality deviation‟, „non-
conformance‟, „quality failure‟ and „snag‟ are used interchangeably to describe imperfections in
constructed buildings.[11] But when we see these words each of them used to describe something
different from the other. In this research the concern is to define and study “defect” in building
projcts.
Black‟s Law Dictionary (7th edition) defines „defect‟ as meaning „an imperfection or
shortcoming‟, without identifying how the imperfection or shortcoming should be judged.
Cambridge Dictionary defines „defect‟ as meaning „A fault or problem in something that spoils
that thing‟ this definition is narrow because a defect not necessarily spoils the building. „Non-
conformance‟ is the term used by ISO 9000:2005 to define „the failure to fulfill a requirement‟.
Those definitions are not solid by themselves, not addressing defect fully. Practical cases may
give some clue on this ground. [4]
Literatures in area of defects include the followings. [4]
1. Defects can represent more than just bad workmanship and materials, and that quality is
just one category of defective work. The previous understanding of defect emerges from
only bad workmanship & a defective material was questioned. So, defect can comes from
different causes.
2. A defect was defined as meaning „A lack or absence of something essential to
completeness‟.
3. A defect in an item of plant included „anything which renders the plant unfit for the use
for which it is intended, when used in a reasonable way and with reasonable care‟.
4. A defect did not include a design defect.
These previous definitions of defects are analyzed as follows: the first case is comprehensive and
show defect can be manifested by bad workmanship, defective material and other flaw; the
second case is not sufficiently all including, building work can be complete but nonetheless
defective; similarly the third case is potentially too wide, as a building can be unfit for use, yet
not be defective in the sense that someone can be held responsible for its unfitness; fourth case
was interesting this one should be treated with some caution because subsequent cases expose
that a defect includes design as well as workmanship. So, this definition, perhaps, one of those
cases that should be treated as confined to its own special facts.
The comprehensive definition is matched only by the variety of terms used to describe defects.
These include: disconformity, non-conformity, noncompliant and incomplete. The phrase
„temporary disconformity‟ is also encountered, and has a special significance, as does the
commonplace term „snagging‟ (a much misused term, but one that generally refers to work that
is in fact and in law defective). None of the above attempts throws any additional light on the
meaning of the term „defect‟.
Finally a definition given by Watt (1999) with little modification is used in this research and it
was more comprehensive than other, that is: defect is the term used to define a shortcoming in
the function, performance, statutory or user requirements of a building, and might manifest itself
within the structure, fabric, services or other facilities of the affected building.
2.1.2. Defect & Failure

It is important to clarify the distinction between a building defect and a building failure. Strictly
speaking, these two terms, although similar, should not be treated as being synonymous. A defect
is a shortfall in function, performance, statutory or user requirements occurring at any time in the
life of the product, element or building in which it occurs. It is also a departure from design
requirements where these were not themselves at fault. A failure, in contrast, is the termination
of a product or element‟s ability to perform its intended function. [12]
Generally defect shall be interpreted as a fault in an element, material or component of a

building. For example, a flush cope on a parapet with little or no flashing would be termed a
defect. On the other hand, a building failure is here meant as a consequence of such a
defect/fault. A failure may be thought of as an unplanned or unintentional negative effect of one
or a combination of defects, which leads to a shortfall in performance. Using the flush cope
given above, a typical failure would be rainwater penetration at the wall head due to the
inadequate weathering of the cope, which results in spalling or lamination of the
brickwork/rendering. It is this spalling that would be deemed the failure.
Moreover, in law a distinction would be made between a fault and a failure. The former would
be classified as a defect, that which caused the failure. The latter would be classed as the damage
resulting from such a defect. This is important for the courts when it comes to assessing the cost
of remedying construction failures to find out the extent of damages awarded to the aggrieved
party if a case has been proved against the contractor or designer.
Defects then can be real or perceived. Even if they are real, they are relative rather than
absolute.[12] Their origins are often not what they look like to be, but can be traced back to a
complicated interaction between lack of knowledge, lack of education, lack of training, lack of
experience, lack of definition, lack of care, or lack of enforcement. Because they are relative,
defects cannot be avoided, but by the same argument, quality can always be improved and
defectiveness can always be reduced. A defect may be described as something that:
 Does not come up to the expectations of the client;
 Falls below the prescribed standard for things of its kind;
 Is less acceptable than expected to be;
 Is the result of an error
Now a day it may be reasonably assumed that since the causes of most defects are fairly well
known there should be an overall decline in building failures. Unfortunately, the reverse is the
[12]
case. Some have argued that, building failures are increasing in frequency and severity.
Reducing the incidence of building failures is not just important to control construction costs.
Moreover, it is important to control building failures for the following main reasons: [12]
 Increase the sustainability of buildings – make them last longer and more energy
efficient.
 Achieve buildings that offer better value for money with lower maintenance costs.
 Make properties safer – reduce hazards and accidents in buildings.
 Combat poor indoor air quality – to avoid unpleasant odor and building-related illnesses.
 Reduce negligence and other legal consequences in construction.
2.1.3. Defect & Deterioration

Problems and failures in buildings can be caused by defects or deterioration. Defects arise due to
error or omission, or negligence by a designer or contractor, but deterioration is a natural process
which may be unavoidable, although reduced by care in design and the selection of materials.
However, where the rate of deterioration is excessive it may be due to a defect, such as the
selection and use of unsuitable materials, or an event such as a water leak resulting in fungal
decay. A defect in such circumstances may be due to error or omission or negligence during
construction or repair, or it may be a failure by a building owner or tenant to maintain the
building adequately or to repair it promptly after accidental or weather damage.
When a problem or failure arises and a building owner or tenant decides to seek compensation, it
may be very difficult to establish that it may be because of defect rather than normal
deterioration, lack of maintenance or failure to repair promptly. This is mainly because a study
for cause of action can only arise if a person or firm has suffered an actual loss. [2]
2.1.4. Investigation
Identifying the precise causal factor(s) of building defects is frequently a difficult task for any
[12]
investigator. Constraints of access, time and resources often make the investigator‟s job
difficult and demanding. When problems occur in buildings it is extremely important that their
root cause is properly identified. If the initial diagnosis is inadequate or mistaken, this may result
in [12]
 The significance of the defect being underestimated, leading to it being ignored,
unattended or marginalized;
 The significance of the defect being overestimated, leading to excessive or unnecessary
remedial work;
 The wrong or inappropriate repair leading to the defect not being effectively
cured/rectified, this could even aggravate the problem.
Every type of building contains defects to some degree. The consequences of such defects may
be minor, but others are more important and may affect the building‟s appearance and usage of
the property. However, the cost of rectifying or not rectifying building defects could be
extensive. In more serious instances, they may cause a hazard to health and safety for those in
and around the building.
In many cases, however, establishing the precise causal factor(s) of a building defect is neither
simple nor straightforward. [12] There are several reasons for this. It is not easy to dismantle fully
the part of the building where a defect has appeared to expose fully the extent and nature of the
problem. This is complicated because of incomplete nature of information about the affected
element or its history. Documents such as the original specification or drawings may be missing
or only partially available.
A full breakdown description of the make-up of the materials originally used in a building is
often unavailable. In addition, for obvious commercial reasons suppliers are often unwilling to
expose the precise composition and manufacture of their materials. This often makes it difficult
to achieve the correct diagnosis without a thorough investigation.
Thus the process of detecting faults in buildings is often made difficult in a specific situation
because of the presence of relatively few symptoms but with a wide range of possible causes and
defects. [12] Moreover, the precise causing mechanism of a building defect is not always apparent
even though the cause may be obvious. The same symptoms can be caused by different agencies.
A variety of agencies working in combination can cause a defect. For example, rainwater
penetration can lead to dry rot, which is the most destructive form of timber decay in buildings.
Dampness is the “cause” of the problem in this case, but the source of the moisture may not be so
obvious.
Similarly, a single cause can result in several symptoms. For example, penetrating dampness
through a blocked cavity wall can result in corrosion of the wall ties (leading to horizontal
expansion of the mortar joints in the outer leaf) and moisture staining or soiling on the inside
face of the inner leaf of brick work. [12]
When a problem occurs in a building it is crucial that the root cause is identified quickly. If the
initial diagnosis is inadequate or erroneous, this may lead to the defect not being effectively
rectified. It is also likely to result in a reoccurrence or aggravation of the problem.
2.2. Types and Causes of Defects

Construction defects usually include any deficiency in the performing or furnishing of the
design, planning, supervision, inspection, construction or observation of construction to any new
home or building, where there is a fault to construct the building in a reasonably workmanlike
manner and/or the structure fails to perform in the manner that is reasonably intended by the
[7]
buyer. In the building industry, there are different approaches to classify defects, like by its
severity, by construction stage, by type, by cause, etc. [9] Generally, Western Countries categorize
construction defects in one of four categories: design deficiencies, material deficiencies,
construction deficiencies, or subsurface deficiencies. [7]
A literature analysis part of research done in Spain put different ways of classifications of
building defects that are done by other researchers. Some of the researcher suggests classifying
defects into major and minor categories, taking into account the severity, classifying the defect as
technical, aesthetic or functional with technical meaning when the workmanship or material of
an element reduces its capacity to fulfill the functional performance of a structure; aesthetic
meaning when the appearance of a material or building element is adversely affected; or
functional meaning when a dwelling fails to function in its intended manner. Other research
distinguishes between defects due to the construction process or to natural degradation related to
a lack of maintenance by the occupants of the house. [9]
Other researchers propose to classify defects in technical, omissions, and aesthetic with technical
meaning when workmanship, material, or design of an element of the building reduces its ability
to function properly; omissions meaning parts of a home that are simply omitted; or aesthetic
meaning when the performance of a building element is adversely affected. [9]
Similarly a study done in the same country shows that the most common defects in residential
buildings were: „inappropriate installation‟, „bad surface appearance‟ and „affected
functionality‟. „Inappropriate installation‟ includes materials, elements or items incorrectly
positioned, or those that do not satisfy project specifications or do not have the adequate
characteristics. „Surface/appearance‟ defects included bumps, dips, uneven surfaces, hit,
scratches and efflorescence. The majority of the „surface/appearance‟ defects detected during
construction were honeycombs in concrete elements, which were mainly caused by poor
workmanship. „Affected functionality‟ defects refer to disabled building elements or systems that
must be replaced because their functionality is completely affected. [11]
Other study shows that defects in building projects have a number of causes. A study done in
Malaysia shows that the contribution factor for causes of building defects & failures are: climatic
conditions, this is a problem in most buildings which are located in tropical countries; location of
building, buildings that are located near the sea or rivers tend to have common building defects;
construction materials; building type and change in use, this is because some buildings were built
to only hold certain loads and sometimes may not withstand additional loads; Lack of
maintenance of building; faulty design; faulty construction; corruption and lack of
supervision.[10] A study undertaken by the Building Research Establishment (BRE) over a
number of years in the UK indicated that 50 per cent of defects found on construction projects
could be attributed to design issues, 40 per cent occurred during the construction phase (as a
result of on-site practice), and 10 per cent were due to product failure. [14]
For the purpose of this research, the defects‟ classification system will be based on the type of
defect. Based on degree of visibility defects can be classified as patent & latent defects.
Patent and latent defects
Defects, whatever their qualitative nature may be patent or latent and its consequences may
differ depending on whether defects are patent or latent. The fact that there may be different
consequences means that it is important to be able to decide when a defect is patent and when it
is latent. [4]
A straight forward definition of patent defect is a defect which is open or visible to the eye. But
here the degree of visibility is the main concern and a defect was said to be patent if observable,
whether or not actually observed.
Some researcher suggested that many building defects are latent in nature and do not appear
early in the construction stage. However, other studies found important defects arising during the
first stages of the construction process and identified that the problems with the stability of the
structure were the most important construction defects in residential building. [4]
Latent defects, on the other hand, are those that are hidden and, unlike to the above case, not
observable. The concept of a latent defect is not a difficult one. It means a concealed defect. [4]
Structural and Non-structural defects
 Structural defect
Structural defect means any defect in a structural element of a building that is caused by
defective design, defective or faulty workmanship or defective material and sometimes any
combination of these. Building structure includes earth retaining walls, columns, beams and flat
slabs. [19]
According to the Engineering Encyclopedia, structural defect can be categorized as cracks in

foundations (Substructure), cracks in floor or slabs (superstructure), and cracks in walls
[20]
(superstructure). These defects can be caused by improper soil analysis, inappropriate site
selection, and the use of defective materials. Most of the structural problem can be avoided by
implying the exact and detail of the design and planning.
Structural defects in a building can occur over time due to deterioration, wear and tear,
overloading, and poor maintenance. They must be repaired to maintain the building‟s structure
and to prevent any further failures. Regular inspection is the key to protecting the „health‟ of a
building‟s structure. Structural defect that always occurs are steel corrosion, cracks, and
deflection.
 Non-structural defect
Non-structural defect in a residential building is described as a defect in a non-structural element
of the building as a result of defective residential building work. [19]
According to the Engineering Encyclopedia, non-structural defect includes defect in brick work,
dampness in old structures, and defects in plaster works.
In general there are different types of building defects which are caused by different mechanism.
In this research it is tried to see types, causes, effects & procedures to reduce main building
defects and this is covered in subsequent sections.
2.2.1. Dampness
Dampness can be a serious matter, particularly to buildings subjected to water. Not only does it
deteriorate building structures but also damages to furnishings. Moisture, of course, cannot be
totally avoided from buildings. Its movement is a natural and common phenomenon affecting
building components. It is also one of the most fundamental and major sources of defects in
building components and elements. [12] It‟s needed for both the building itself and for the comfort
of its occupants. Organic materials such as timber lack of moisture would be affected by drying.
This in turn would cause them to shrink, crack and warp. The occupants, too, cannot inhabit a
[12]
totally dry building (i.e. one in which the relatively humidity is near or at 0%). Moisture is
water present in stuffs while humidity is the amount of water vapor present in atmosphere.
Too much moisture (i.e. >70% relative humidity) in a building can be damaging not only to its
structure, fabric and contents but also to its occupants. The risks to health associated with
dampness are well established. [12]
Knowledge of the main sources of moisture therefore is vital. It will enable steps to be planned to
reduce the total amounts captured, entering or generated in a building, and so help reduce or
prevent some of its harmful influences.
The main cause of dampness is water entering a building through different routes. Water
penetration occurs commonly through walls exposed to prevailing wet wind or rain. With the
existence of gravity, water may penetrate through capillaries or cracks between mortar joints,
and bricks or blocks before building up trap moisture behind hard renders. Water may also drive
further up the wall to emerge at a higher level. Dampness also occurs in walls due to other
factors such as leaking gutters or down pipes, defective drains, burst plumbing and condensation
due to inadequate ventilation. It may also occur flooding of under floor voids via air bricks or
breaches in damp proofing materials, damp proofing claddings and/or their connections. Direct
water penetration may also occur with plumbing or drainage. [12]
Generally, the main causes of dampness in building construction are as follow.
1. Rain
Precipitation can be wind driven that it penetrates joints that remain watertight in normal weather
condition. The gutter overflow also can collect and be the aspects of dampness against walls.
2. Condensation
Humid air condensation on cooler surface or within, or between, building materials also can
result to dampness. Air can become humid in several ways, including from the occupants‟ water
vapors.
3. Rising damp and flooding
It may contact with groundwater or floodwater. It also the groundwater may be absorbed by the
walls and transported up the wall by capillary action.
4. Services leaks
It might not just from pipes and tanks, but also the overflowing of condensation forming together
with ventilation systems.
5. Construction process
The construction process too can play its role in this scenario. It is where the process of mixing
water to form mixtures that dry out for the construction purpose before the building is start to
give service, but sometimes by retaining moisture (sealed in by impermeable finishes) that shows
and causes problems in the completed building.
6. Use of the building
This may include the cleaning of the building, spills, and apparatus leaking.
7. Moisture in the air
It is in contrast with condensation. Hygroscopic salts can extract moisture from the air in
condition that would not allow that moisture to undergo the process of condensation. Dampness
comes and goes according with the change of condition. Dampness also may leave stains or
traces of mold and lichens and also in certain cases, mosses.
2.2.2. Foundation Defect
Foundations must be designed to support the loads from a structure, taking proper account of
ground conditions. The design of foundations and the calculations involved will not be
considered in detail, but only the diagnosis of foundation defects which may be observed in the
course of investigations into defects in buildings.
Normal foundations comprise concrete strips on which the walls (columns) are erected, together
with prepared foundations to support any solid floors. It is well recognized that strip foundations
must have sufficient width to provide an adequate bearing area to support the imposed load on
the ground support concerned; the depth of the foundation strip is important in terms of the
ability of the foundations to resist local fluctuations in the bearing capacity of the ground without
developing fractures, and the total depth of the foundations is important if it is necessary to
excavate sufficiently deeply to provide bearings on better compacted soil or perhaps even rock at
a greater depth. [2]
The importance of careful preparation of foundations for solid floors and the loads come from
above is not so widely recognized, as floor loads are much less and the requirements much less
severe, but problems commonly arise if the floor slab support is poorly compacted, or support
varies on a sloping site between excavated ground at one end and inadequately compacted fill at
the other. If the load bearing capacity of the ground is poor, construction on a large reinforced
concrete raft may provide the best means for spreading the foundation load, and various piling
systems may be preferred to excavating deep foundation trenches. [2]
2.2.2.1. Settlement & Subsidence

The differences between settlement and subsidence failures are not widely recognized, although
the different causes are obviously important in relation to remedial works.
Settlement is due to normal compaction of the supporting ground as the building loads are
imposed on the foundations. Some settlement always occurs during construction, but there is
usually some further settlement or creep following completion. Settlement is normal and must be
considered in design and it is only risky because the external walls, the internal walls and solid
floors impose different loads and therefore settle to a different extent, the most obvious damage
being imposed in building. This may be manifested by an increase in height of the floors, or
settlement of the heavily loaded peripheral walls in relation to the internal partition walls. [12]
Subsidence is a downward movement under applied load. It can occur as a large movement
whereby the building progressively settles with the soil. This may be small, in the order of
millimeters. According to the soil type, it may manifest itself in the first few years following
construction or almost at once. Minimal subsidence occurring uniformly may produce little in the
form of structural problems for the building. It is more common for partial or differential
subsidence to occur, however, and it is this form of movement which is generally more
destructive, especially to building services. This usually results in differential movement in the
foundations, causing intense disruption to the structure and fabric of the building. Subsidence
follows from some unexpected event following construction. Ground water percolation may
result in removal of material and loss of support. [12]
Settlement is normal and must be anticipated in design, so that damage due to settlement is an
indication of inadequate design in relation to ground conditions or failure to observe the design
during construction. The cause of subsidence may be as straightforward as poor bearing capacity
or soil erosion. It is distinguishable from settlement, which is a movement within a structure due
to a redistribution of loading within the structure (or soil).
2.2.2.2. Tree root damage

Tree root damage results most obviously from the penetration of tree roots into masonry and
beneath foundations, and rupturing due to progressive root growth. Such damage can usually be
readily identified by excavation and does not justify special comment, except in relation to safe
separation between trees and buildings. [12]
A more serious problem is the presence of trees in conjunction with shrinkable clay. Deciduous
trees will remove water from the clay during the summer and the clay will shrink, but the tree
will have no demand for water during the winter so that the clay moisture content will increase
and it will expand.
2.2.3. Floor Defect
Floors exhibit a range of defects related to their expected performance in use. The main functions
of flooring are structural adequacy, including the transfer of all loads (dead and imposed) to the
ground or the walls/ foundations without deflecting excessively; to resist water penetration; to
control thermal losses and to provide a safe and stable surface. Special requirements include fire
resistance and control of acoustic transmission. Floors can be not good enough in any or all of
these contexts. There may also be problems with the floor finish. [5]
 Structural inadequacy in floors
Floors may be structurally inadequate because of failures in their bearing at their end supports
(or in the case of large spans, possibly at the mid-support also). They may also be defective
through excessive span for their sizing, or overloading beyond design specification. Excessive
sagging, especially in the sensitive middle third of the span, can produce bending as a result of
overloading. [5]
In concrete suspended floors there may be problems with connectivity between the concrete and
shear connections to the supporting beams, and also with inaccurately placed or incorrectly
developed reinforcement. There may be similar inadequacies of bearing at walls, which can
produce sagging at the perimeter of the floor. There is also the possibility of cold bridging with
such details if the floor crosses the cavity or is supported in a solid wall. In upper floors,
generally, there can be severe structural consequences of the installation of services using
notching, especially where this has been accompanied by the movement of strutting. [5]
The main causes of structural inadequacy in floors are,
i. Design defects
ii. Material defects
iii. Workmanship defects
 Dampness in floors
Dampness in flooring can produce a range of direct problems in the form of localized rot (dry or
wet rot). If ignored, this rot can become extensive, especially where a lack of ventilation due to
blockage or omission of air bricks and cross-ventilation occurs. It is important to be able to
identify the sources of the damp. In general the causes of dampness in floors include flooding of
under floor voids via air bricks or breaches in DPMs, DPCs and/or their connections. Direct
water penetration may also occur with plumbing or drainage. [5]
2.2.4. Wall Defect

The main function of the wall of a building is to isolate the interior from the exterior
conditions.[2] Just the presence of the wall is sufficient to achieve this function reasonably, as is
demonstrated by the efficiency of a well-designed shelter. However, the efficiency of walls can
be greatly improved in relation to excluding dampness and thermally insulating the interior.
A second function of a wall is structural and to support the load imposed by any suspended
floors and the roof above. These basic functions have to be considered when designing walls to
achieve a certain aesthetic effect, but these various requirements may conflict and may result in
various wall problems. [2] Masonry like any other structural material requires an understanding of
its strengths and weaknesses in order that an economic design can be produced in accordance
with accepted statutory requirements.
The main wall defects are as follow, [6]

 Dimensional instability: - The dimensions of masonry elements in a building are
continually changing. For example, bricks expand because of moisture absorption, and
mortars contract as they harden. Unfortunately, there are still designers who are not
aware of or choose to ignore the effects of masonry movements, and it is not uncommon
to see long terraced buildings with no movement joints.
 Defects related to masonry materials: - Serious structural defects can result if the basic
components used in the construction of masonry walls are defective or inadequate for the
conditions of use.
 Workmanship problem: - Some workmanship defects are mortars with inadequate
ratios of cement, failure to build walls plumb, using incorrect ties and inadequate tie
embedment, using unauthorized workability admixtures, inadequate number of wall ties,
poor lintel bearings, over-strong mortar, etc.
The main causes of dimensional instability or movements are
 Deformation or cracking due to loading

 Movement caused by temperature changes
 Movement caused by moisture expansion

 Movement caused by chemical reactions, The remaining causes of wall problems are
because of defective material & poor workmanship
2.2.5. Door & Window Defect

Window and door design in construction is a complex part and it is not area of concern in this
research instead a review of problems encountered with windows and doors in the hope that this
information will assist in the diagnosis of defects on site.
Windows are perhaps the most vulnerable building element in external building parts. Glass
panels should always be replaced once cracks occur. Common defects in traditional steel
windows usually arise from rusty frames, and deterioration or loss of putty or sealant to hold the
glass panels.
Aluminum windows have been widely used in new developments and as replacement of steel
windows in existing buildings but recent incidents of their failure have cause to raise safety
concerns.
Aluminum window system involves assembly of a certain number of components by rivets,

screws, hinges and fixing anchors. These accessories, which are prone to failure, require regular
servicing and maintenance to prevent failure. Without the required servicing and maintenance,
hinges may become too tight to operate, rivets may loosen up and screws may be corroded that
shorten their life-span. When excessive forces are applied to operate such windows or when they
are subject to wind load, distortion of the window sashes or even the frame may result, causing
serious injuries to the public. [13]
Common door & window defects are as follow,
 Water seepage through door & window frame

 Water seepage through joints between window & door frame and wall
 Difficulty in opening and closing of glass panel (for casement window)
 Difficulty in sliding of inner panel (for sliding window)
 Misalignment
 Untidy joints between window & door frame and wall

 Gaps at window & door frame corner
 Stained glazing
 Poor frame finish
 Mortar droppings and paint drips on frame
 Physical damages and scratches on frame and glazing
 Loose or improperly installed gaskets
 Physical damages
Many times doors and windows are twisted before they are installed causing them to be hard to
operate. Settlement and poor framing can also cause the doors and windows to sit improperly.
Either way this can be a problem that will only get worse over time. Defects associated with
windows most often have to do with leaks, which can be a result of poor installation. This means
the windows were not flashed properly, or the window product itself is defective and leaking. In
some buildings windows are difficult to operate. This can be a sign of soil settlement, structural
deficiencies or defective material. [17]
2.2.6. Roof Defect

Roofs are among the most difficult parts of a building to inspect in case defect occurs. These
difficulties also lead to poor maintenance. As a generalization, it can be said that pitched roofs
[12]
have given few problems and flat roofs have given many. The best advice one can give is to
use a pitched roof wherever possible. To top a wide-span building with a pitched roof often mean
that the total roof height would be unacceptable in terms of both visual appearance and cost. For
such a building, a flat roof may be the only feasible solution. To use flat roofs for buildings of
comparatively small span, however, such as dwellings, is not a good option.
Roof usually exposed to the extremes of temperature degree and change, solar radiation, and
wind action. Roofs have special risk due to the design of the building itself such as services
passing through the roof covering, and internal gutters. The consequence small defective of roof
will may be greater effect of similar defect in a wall or other element.
Roof defect are divided into structural faults and defect in the waterproofing material. The
majority of roof defect that occurs is distortion of either the roof or of the wall at roof level.
Normally, structural defect can be identified from the visual inspection. For the defect of
waterproofing material, it will provide the building to be durable under wide range of exposure
condition. The pitch roof sagging result is from the slating or tilling that has dished appearance,
and the ridge may also have sagged. This defect is more commonly found in older pitched and
tiled or slated roof.
While there are many different types of roofing defects, most are known to be caused by:
 Improper installation
The installation of roof will need a number of skilled workers. If the roof is improperly installed,
it wills yield to roof defect such as roof leakage and sagging. The causes of roof defect are
because the worker maybe not have a license, or certificate apart from having a low level of
experience.
 Poor workmanships
Quality of workmanship is needed such as to maintain and construct the roof. The life
expectancy will be reduced due to the poor workmanships which are can both bring to loss for
both the dealer and the buyer.
 Defective materials
Materials themselves also may be the factors to the roof defect. The material too, may be not
suitable to weather condition. Sometimes, it is not installed correctly also due to sagging and
deformation.
2.2.7. Cladding Defect

Most modern non-residential and many residential buildings have cladding as the main form of
[12]
wall finish. Problems such as water ingress as a result of joint failure or surface degradation
are likely to continue to pose as the main defects in claddings.
Generally, cladding defects are caused by differential movement between the cladding and its
background; by failure to allow for the inaccuracies nature in construction; by inadequacy of the
[12]
fixing and jointing methods used; and by premature failure of sealants. The likelihood of
failure has also been enhanced by not allowing for the dimensional deviations which occur in
manufactured or site-cast products, and for the inaccuracies in setting-out and during erection.
Sometimes, mistakes during construction, such as forgetting to remove packing spacers after
final fixing, have also contributed. The main causes of movement are due to temperature effects,
moisture changes and creep.
[12]
Many cladding systems have proved incapable of preventing the entry of rain. In part rain
penetration has followed the cracking, spalling and dislodgement of cladding caused mostly by
the differential movement. Lack of attention to joints and to rain-shedding features has also been
a cause. There are many forms of joint associated with the various claddings used, some complex
in geometry.
2.2.8. Plaster rendering defect

Plaster or render is like mortar coating over the block work. The coating on the inside walls
called plaster, then the coating outside the walls called render. Plaster and render is totaly
different. The render is generally richer and mostly in cement than the plaster due to weather
resistant.
Both of plaster and renders have different function. The plaster insides the walls to make the
walls smooth, easy to clean, avoid from insect, and for better appearance. Apart from that, the
plasters act as a protection against fire. The other functions are breathable for walls, abrasion
resistant, and suitable for decorating or covering with coating, wallpaper and tiles. For the
renders, is provided to protect them from the influences of weather.
Mostly the defective plaster rendering occurs on the external walls, column and ceiling.
Defective rendering are normally caused by biological attacks arising from penetrating rain,
evaporation, condensation, air pollution, dehydration and thermal stress. The mold or harmful
growth, insect, animals, and traffic vibration also will contribution causes of defective plaster
rendering. Prior to being decomposed and broken apart, rendering may crack due to either
[18]
shrinkage or movement in the substrate. Common types of defective plaster rendering and
causes are listed below in table.
Table 2.1: – Common defective plaster rendering & causes. [17]
Common defective plaster rendering Possible causes

1. Cracking in Plastering,  Loss of bond between coats,
2. Holes in Plaster wall,  Surface cracking,
 Friable powdery surfaces,
3. Plaster falling off from ceiling,
 Water damage,
4. Shrinkage Cracking  Movement of structure,
 Non suitable of renders and plasters,
 Chemical attacks,
 Efflorescence,
 Lime bloom,
 Thickness of render
 Popping or Pitting
2.2.9. Ceiling Defects
The type of defects that normally occur at ceilings and its causes are listed below in the table. [11]
Table 2.2: – Ceiling defects & causes
Common defects Possible Causes
 Cracking and loss of  Movement of foundations,
adhesion.  Changes in moisture content of subsoil,
 Shrinkage cracks.  Extend roots of trees under foundations
 Full thickness of plaster  Continuing structural movement
loose.  Use of unsuitable undercoat,
 Top coat of plaster loose.  Weak or shrinkable undercoat
 Damp.  Condensation of water vapor, Residual of entrapped
 Dirty patches. water, Direct rain penetration,
 Peeling and flaking finishes.  Defective tiles or slates
 Leaking water tank, Leaks from joints or defective
pipes,
 No insulation between joists, Air currents caused by
heat, Efflorescence.
2.2.10. Building service Defect

2.2.10.1. Plumbing & Drainage
The soils through which cold-water supply services pass can vary considerably, from
comparatively non-aggressive light sand and chalk to heavy clays containing organic matter
suitable for the development of bacteria which can assist corrosion. Some sulphates and chloride
bearing soils can be very aggressive. Ground to a depth of up to 1200mm is of main interest and
[12]
here the natural soil may be contaminated, anyway, by a wide variety of builders‟ rubble.
When corrosion or other faults do occur in buried pipework, repair work to be costly. Protective
tapes and wrappings are used for in many areas where galvanized steel is used. The solution to
avoiding the problems referred to above concerning scale build up and corrosion in pipes is to
use a modern plumbing material such as polybutylene for the pipework. [12]
2.2.10.2. Electricity supply

All electric cables give off heat in use and this is usually dissipated without any difficulty.
However, cables can get overheated if placed beneath loft insulation, behind insulated dry lining
or if placed in a position where the temperature of the surrounding environment is high. The
insulation of the cable will then be damaged and there can be a risk of a short circuit and
possibly fire. Cable in power circuits is more at risk than cable in lighting circuits, for the former
is more likely to be loaded near to full capacity. Electric cable should not be covered by thermal
insulation and shouldn‟t it be used where ambient temperature regularly exceeds 30 oC. Where
this is not feasible, cables will need to be de-rated in accordance with the regulations prepared by
electrical engineers. There can also be an interaction between PVC cables and expanded
polystyrene often used for insulation and this can cause degradation of the PVC. The two should
be kept apart. [12]
Loose connections can cause an electrical fire as well as cause malfunction of the electrical
system. In addition, an inadequate cable rating to appliances such as shower units and cookers
can also cause heat build-up, thus increasing the fire risk.
2.3. Summary of causes of construction defect
The causes of building defects can be of the results of either party that involve in the
construction industry. Construction is done in an environment that is far from ideal. Everything
that happens cannot be controlled. Human errors and communication gaps are causes to defects.
In this part of the study explained the main causes of construction defects. Such as defects due to
design error, workmanship error, defective material and subsurface related.
2.3.1. Design error
This could be due to lack of motivation of the designer and carelessness. Besides this design
error may be due the lack of properly collecting and organizing data, unqualified designers and
lack of experience in order to consider and understand the output of the programing design
software. [24]
Some researcher argued that, because design firm are taking short cut and not performing their
usual checks, design error are occurring. They are not undertaking design audit, review and
[24]
verification because they are getting low fees as it is very competitive out there. This might
be the case in western countries. Lack of communication between designer and contractors could
be one of the factors that design errors to be created.
Sometimes architects can design a structure that is aesthetically pleasing yet with structural
deficiencies that can lead to defects. In order to keep this from occurring, other architects should
evaluate the design for flaws before the design is implemented in a structure. However, some
design flaws are not evident until the structure is built, which means that testing a design with a
scale model or building a test house prior to marketing the design should be a requirement. [24]
2.3.2. Workmanship error
Workman ship error could arise due a number of acts at construction site. Unethical acts of
worker like chewing “chat” at site may cause not to give full attention at their work. In addition
to that most work men are not professional and not skillful about how to use their work machine,
tools and they didn‟t update their skill. Sometimes the workers doing the actual building work
are not careful to take their construction duties, those all error that arises due workman ship can
be the result of a contractor not overseeing the building process as they should or simply not
caring about the work being done. At other times, even though the contractor was watching the
error that happened due to their workmanship problem, in order to save money and time they
didn‟t return back rather use short cut. While short cut solution can work out to the contractor's
advantage, but it can be result in a construction defect in the structure.
2.3.3. Defective Materials
Constructing a building using defective material can be the cause of many construction defects in
a structure. An example could be a building built with defective, out of date, paint could lead to
peeling and a building built with defective roofing material that allowed water to leak into the
structure. The result could be a number of defects such as the wood decay, grey growth and
moisture stains on the wall and ceiling.
Metal fixings associated with stonework can fail because of corrosion, or an inability of the
fixings to accommodate thermal, moisture and load-related movement. In addition to that
limestone can deteriorate when exposed to acidic rainwater or any other sulphurous source and
the sulphurous acids can combine with the calcium carbonate to produce soluble calcium
sulphate and hygroscopic calcium nitrate in the surface region of the stone. Water run-off from
limestone can cause deterioration of sandstone by carrying calcium sulphate and calcium nitrate
onto the sandstone surface. This can cause contour scaling. [24]
2.3.4. Subsurface Related
Owner is responsible for investigation of soil and if unable to do so might lead to variety of
construction defects. One of the first steps in a building project is to perform proper soil analysis
and preparation. Proper soil analysis helps the builder to know the right strategy to use in
preparing the land prior to construction. Poorly investigated or analyzed soil can have damaging
effects on a structure. An example of this is building a house on expansive soil. In order to
prevent damages to a structure built upon expansive soil, a builder would need to build a
foundation that would be able to withstand the changes in soil consistency. Builders who
unknowingly build upon expansive soil can experience cracks throughout the structure and on
the outside pavement as well.
Houses and foundations go through a settling period, especially during the first years after they
were built. Expansion and contraction with hot and cold weather changes along with normal
settling can change wall-to-ceiling alignment and can cause cracks in both these areas. Ceiling
cracks generally follow the joints between drywall sheets, and as long as they remain minor, with
widths of less than 0.32 cm, you can patch them with tape and joint compound. [24]
2.4. Effects of Construction Defects
Construction defect can decrease and affect the value of the buildings. Accordingly defects are
developments in construction that reduces the project`s value instead of adding to it. [1]
Other than reducing project value, where the construction defect is apparent, it also can cause the
project totally delay which mean not complete with in the period state in the contract. Cost
overrun can be known as one of the effect when the construction defects happen in the
construction projects. Construction defect will also affect society at large due to possible danger
posed and result in direct and indirect cost in repairs, abnormally high maintenance dispute and
possible loss of building. Besides to these, construction defect affect project functionality which
leads to high maintenance cost. The contractor and/or consultant who engaged in defective act
may highly affect their reputation.
2.5. Failure Pattern and Control
Avoidable building defects occur again and again. The reasons involve consideration of the
structure of the industry, the particular problems associated with innovation, and control systems.
These essentially “software” aspects of the avoidance of building failures needs as much
attention as the “hardware” aspects dealt with already. It is probable that the greatest scope for
improvement in building performance lies more with the former than the latter. [12]
Every type of building contains defects to some degree. The consequences of such defects may
be minor but others are more important and may affect the appearance, value and usage of the
building. However, the cost of rectifying or not rectifying building defects could be extensive. In
more serious occasions, they may pose a hazard to health and safety.
2.5.1. Visible building defect
 New Buildings
Why is it, despite our increasing understanding of construction technology and materials, that
building failures still occur? The reasons are not hard to find. Modern buildings are more
sophisticated, as are their systems and facilities. Many of these advances make the chances of
mistakes occurring in the construction process greater. The use of innovative materials and new
[12]
construction techniques may not be fully tried and tested for every situation. This can also
result in unforeseen problems immediately after a building‟s commissioning as well as during its
occupancy.
Fast track building and shorter construction times are becoming increasingly common difficulty
for the industry. All of these changes have put many pressures on designers and contractors to
produce defect-free buildings that meet the needs of property users.
 Old Buildings
Re occurrence of building defects is often caused by acts of omission. Neglect and poor quality
[12]
maintenance are major influences on the incidence of important defects such as dry rot.
Moreover, failure to repair properly or on time can also activate further defects.
Buildings that are partially or totally vacant are more vulnerable to deterioration because of age
and defects. In particular, empty dwellings pose a direct risk of damage to adjoining properties
through dampness and other infestations. According to Ransom (2007), “the longer a property is
empty, the greater the likelihood that its physical condition will deteriorate, making it more
difficult to bring back into occupation at a later date and increasing the likelihood that it will
impact on neighboring properties”.
Acts of commission comprise a range of factors that can also contribute to the ongoing nature of
building defects. [12] Poor quality of original construction has a destroying impact on the aftercare
of a building. This can be even worse by inappropriate repairs. Climate change, resulting in
increased flooding or precipitation, may lead to unforeseen water ingress. Deliberate damaging
of things and other forms of abuse can make all of these problems worse. [12]
Ransom (2007), for example, showed where misguided application of waterproof lining repairs
to a building can cause the rise of moisture in a wall. If the wall is lined on both sides, this can
lead to wicking of moisture up the masonry. [12]
2.6. Reducing Building defects
Given the problems of diversity of participants and techniques used, uniqueness of every
building project, outside working conditions, and so on, it is not too difficult to appreciate why
defects in construction are more prevalent than those in other industries. [12] Indeed it is the very
nature of the building industry itself, which makes it difficult to eliminate such problems totally.
Moreover, some building professionals, such as Puller-Strecker (1990), have argued that building
defects will never be totally eliminated. Nevertheless there are a number of measures that would
go some way towards reducing if not avoiding common construction defects:
 An improvement in the “lowest tender” system, without generating excessive inflation of
contract prices, should be sought. [12] Cheapest price does not necessarily mean best value
for money, particularly in the long term. This takes into account quality of product as
well as lowest whole life cost.
 Increased/improved feedback from builders, research bodies, maintenance

engineers/surveyors, and users to designers/specifiers and better feed-forward from
designers/specifiers to maintenance managers and users. Increasing the accessibility to
information for building professionals, managers and technicians will go a long way to
achieving this goal.
 Regular on-the-job training programs for operatives and site staff.
 Improvements could be made in the quality of graphical and written communications. In

addition, training could be given to site staff on improving verbal communication skills.
 Better and more available guidance on commissioning buildings and their services and on
defects avoidance.
 Implement a comprehensive quality control mechanism in each stage of the construction
 All building systems need to be coordinated concurrently, starting with the planning
phase and continuing into the programming and implementation phases.
 Periodic and regular construction site supervision
 Creating awareness of low-skilled laborers
 Revoking license of more frequent defective firm
 Continuously evaluate the capacity of consulting and construction firms
 Develop the capacity of universities and training institution
Besides to measures stated above here are procedures that could be followed in each stage of
buildings to reduce the occurrence of defect.
2.6.1. Pre-construction stage
One of the major causes of construction defects is design inadequacy. This could happen due to
inadequate data about the project site as a result of site investigation problems or due to
professionals in adequacy. Site exploration (investigation) problems could arise due to
uncomfortable site conditions for exploration or lack of well skilled man power and equipment.
Exaggerated cost for exploration is also another problem.
Therefore, design inadequacy of the service installation materials, substructure and

superstructure of a building may lead to serviceability problems or worse to instability.
Serviceability deficiency could rise due to problems with the structure or service installation.
Inadequate design of sanitary pipes or drains such as insufficient diameter of drains, bends being
too sharp, etc. can lead to excessive pressure built up on the pipes causing failure. Serviceability
defects with the structure include cracks, deflections, vibrations etc. these can simply be reduced
by fulfilling the requirements of building standards such as EBCS 95/ Euro code.
Detailed preliminary study and site exploration is necessary for consideration of site condition in
the design, as such field (In situ) exploration and tests and laboratory tests shall be conducted
with necessary equipment and qualified professionals.
2.6.2. During construction stage
Construction techniques that may not be defect free, inconsistent or sub-standard workmanship,
and use of unsuitable construction details can lead to shortly occurring or long list defects. The
large varieties of building materials may not be well similar to one another or under quality
materials below the specified standards. Extreme site conditions may undermine performance
standards during construction.
Thus, the use of standard materials helps in reducing defects caused due to inferior building
materials. For example, for well-proportioned mix ratio selection of aggregates that are hard,
rough, mineral free and well graded maintains the required strength, density, porosity,
workability and curing time of concrete for the intended purpose. Thus, problems such as cracks
caused due to shrinkage and/or overstressing can be hold within limits. Leakage of slab floor,
delamination or worse collapse due to low concrete quality can be controlled.
Defects caused due to bad workmanship should be controlled as they can easily be avoided.
Hence, problems caused due to low technical skills such as in concrete production mixture
segregation leading to low concrete quality/strength, loose tie of reinforcement bars causing
misplacement of the bars leading to over stressing of the structure. Service installation materials
fitting problem are also caused due to ill workmanship. Fitting problems inadequate design of
sanitary pipes can lead to leakage, electrical installation problems and improper fillings around
windows and doors frames are also caused due to bad workmanship. These problems can easily
be avoided by monitoring the works closely and enhancing technical kills of the labor and
providing good working condition.
Good construction management and technical skills are necessary to avoid unnecessary
contamination and wastage of construction materials. Good management also helps in
controlling workmanship errors hence, avoiding defects caused due to bad workmanship. For
example organized onsite material management and storage system can avoid contamination of
materials such as corrosion of steel or mineral attack of aggregates due to storing area‟s top soil.
This avoids problems caused due to corroded steel material; once it is used as a reinforcing
material since the steel cannot overcome the tensile stress on the reinforced concrete structure
and leading to overstressing of the structure, structural cracks may occur undermining the
stability of the whole structure. Spalling of the concrete cover may also occur due to the
corroded steel making the concrete structure more susceptible to carbonation, seriously affecting
the strength of the material.
2.6.3. Post-construction stage
Abuse or misuse of the building is other problem which causes serious defects on the structure or
service installation system. Damage on the building while giving service can be rectified by
proper maintenance. Neglect and poor quality maintenance are major influences on the incidence
of important defects. So to reduce occurrence of defects that leads to failure it should be a correct
use of building and properly managed maintenance activities.
2.7. Summary of literature review
Literature review was done on previous studies, internet, construction management books, and
engineering journals on the topics of building defects. By reviewing the previous studies, types
and causes of building defects, effects of building defects, and reducing measures of building
defect was investigated. This would be used to do case study and to develop the questionnaire
survey in order to collect data from the targeted respondent.
Construction defects usually include any deficiency in the performing or furnishing of the
design, planning, supervision, inspection, construction or observation of construction to any new
home or building, where there is a fault to construct the building in a reasonably workmanlike
manner and/or the structure fails to perform in the manner that is reasonably intended by the
buyer.
In the building industry, there are different approaches to classify building defects, like by its
severity, by construction stage, by type, by cause, etc. Unfortunately no previous studies were
done in Ethiopia in the area of building defects but a research done in Spain put different ways of
classifications of building defects that are done by other researchers. The study classified
building defects into major and minor categories, taking into account the severity, classifying the
defect as technical, aesthetic or functional with technical meaning when the workmanship or
material of an element reduces its capacity to fulfill the functional performance of a structure;
aesthetic meaning when the appearance of a material or building element is adversely affected;
or functional meaning when a dwelling fails to function in its intended manner. Similar research
distinguishes between defects due to the construction process or to natural degradation related to
a lack of maintenance by the occupants of the house. Other researchers propose to classify
defects in technical, omissions, and aesthetic with technical meaning when workmanship,
material, or design of an element of the building reduces its ability to function properly;
omissions meaning parts of a home that are simply omitted; or aesthetic meaning when the
performance of a building element is adversely affected. In this research building defect
classification by type were dealt.
Previous foreign studies shows that defects in building projects have a number of causes. A study
done in Malaysia shows that the contribution factor for causes of building defects & failures are:
climatic conditions, location of building, construction materials, building type and change in use,
lack of maintenance of building, faulty design, faulty construction, corruption and lack of
supervision. A study undertaken by the Building Research Establishment (BRE) over a number
of years in the UK indicated that 50 per cent of defects found on construction projects could be
attributed to design issues, 40 per cent occurred during the construction phase (as a result of on-
site practice), and 10 per cent were due to product failure
Occurrences of building defect pose a number of impacts on the building and its users.
Construction defect can decrease and affect the value of the buildings and reduces the project`s
value instead of adding to it. Other than reduces the project value, where the construction defect
apparent, it also can cause the project totally delay which mean not complete with in the period
state in the contract. Cost overrun can be known as one of the effect when the construction
defects happen in the construction site. Construction defect will also affect society at large due to
possible danger posed and result in direct and indirect cost in repairs, abnormally high
maintenance dispute and possible loss of building.
Given the problems of diversity of participants and techniques used, uniqueness of every
building project, outside working conditions, and so on, it is not too difficult to appreciate why
building defects in construction are more prevalent than those in other industries. Indeed it is the
very nature of the building industry itself, which makes it difficult to eliminate such problems
totally. Moreover, some researchers have argued that building defects will never be totally
eliminated. Nevertheless there are a number of measures that would go some way towards
reducing if not avoiding common construction defects. According to previous studies the most
important defect reducing measures are: an improvement in the “lowest tender” system, without
generating excessive inflation of contract prices; increased/improved feedback from builders,
research bodies, maintenance engineers/surveyors, and users to designers/specifiers and better
feed-forward from designers/specifiers to maintenance managers and users; regular on-the-job
training programs for operatives and site staff; better and more available guidance on
commissioning buildings and their services and on defects avoidance; improvements could be
made in the quality of graphical and written communications at the project site and so on.
In Ethiopian context the problem of building defect can nearly be noticed in many building, both
completed and under construction. This indicates that this problem didn't receive enough
attention by both researchers and responsible authorities. No previous studies undertaken on the
area of building defect shows how the society didn‟t give due attention to this problem. But
studies which were done out of Ethiopia shows building defect should receive attention because
its occurrence can affect cost, time and quality of building projects. By taking this in to
consideration this thesis mainly focus on types, causes, effects and reducing measures of
construction defects in public building projects in Addis Ababa.
Chapter Three: Research Methodology

3.1. Introduction
This chapter describes the methodology of the research. The main topics included in this chapter
are research strategy, research design and data collection. The objectives of this thesis were to
identify types, causes, effects & reducing measures of construction defects in Federal
Government Office Building projects in Addis Ababa and makes conclusions and
recommendations based on findings.
In the capital Addis Ababa there are different public buildings and those buildings are
constructed and regulated by different government offices. Government Construction Bureau,
located at 6 kilo next to Addis Ababa Education Bureau, administer construction of some of
public building. In this bureau construction of city administration office, school and health
centers are monitored. City housing projects constructions are monitored by Addis Ababa city
Administration Integrated Housing Development Program (IHDP). Government building
construction office, located at Beherawi in Ministry of Urban Development, Housing &
Construction buildings 10th floor, is another office established for monitoring Federal
Government Office Building in the capital city. There are also other public buildings in the
capital city but because for ease of administration there constructions are monitored by sub-city
administration office. In this research Federal Government Office Buildings in Addis Ababa
were investigated. So, in this research a case study of stated public buildings and questionnaire
survey were taken by examining the quality of the buildings and construction method and tried to
identify the different types of construction defects observed on the buildings. Projects are listed
on table 3.1
3.2. Research design

Two types of research strategies are used at studies, quantitative and qualitative research.
Quantitative approach is used to gather factual data and to study relationships between facts and
how such facts and relationships accord with theories and the findings of any research executed
previously, but the qualitative approach seek to gain insights and to understand people's
[26]
perception of "the world" whether as individuals or groups .The research strategies adapted
for this research were both qualitative and quantitative research.
Table 3.1:- List of investigated projects

No. Project name Contractor Consultant Project
Status
1 Ministry of Agriculture Giga Construction MH Engineering Completed
Custom & Revenue Emnetu Endeshaw MH Engineering Completed
Authority Building Contractor
2
Ministry of Health Samuel H/Mariam MH Engineering Completed
3 Building Contractor
Ministry of Justice Prefabricated Building MH Engineering Completed
Parts Production
Enterprise
4
Ministry of Agriculture II Prefabricated Building MH Engineering Completed
Parts Production
5 Enterprise
Ministry of Foreign Affairs Prefabricated Building MH Engineering Completed
Parts Production
6 Enterprise
7 Ethiopian Press Agency Flintstone Engineering Completed
8 Central Statistics Agency Giga Construction MH Engineering Completed
Custom & Revenue Zamra Construction MH Engineering Completed
9 Authority II
Ethiopian Road Authority Samuel H/Mariam MH Engineering Under
10 Building Contractor construction
Information & Network Defense Construction MH Engineering Under
12 Security Agency Enterprise construction
Federal Prison Flintstone Engineering ETG Designers & Under
Administration Consultants construction
13
Ministry of Science & Prefabricated Building ETG Designers & Under
Technology Parts Production Consultants construction
14 Enterprise
Ministry of Industry AMB Construction ETG Designers & Under
15 Consultants construction
Ministry of Civil Service Samuel H/Mariam ETG Designers & Under
16 Building Contractor Consultants construction
Federal Main Auditor office Radar Construction ETG Designers & Under
17 Consultants construction
Ministry of Foreign Affairs Rama Construction Muluget Asfaw Under
Conference Hall Consulting construction
Architects &
18 Engineers
Information & Network Defense Construction MH Engineering Under

19 Security Agency II Enterprise construction
Central Statistics Agency II Radar Construction MH Engineering Under
20 construction
Government Higher Teklebirhan Ambaye Defense consulting Under
Officials & Head of State Construction Enterprise construction
21 Residence
Urban Integrated Land Teklebirhan Ambaye Defense consulting Under
Information System Construction Enterprise construction
Development
22
3.3. Thesis Structure

This research consists of five phases; the first one is the proposal for identifying and defining the
problems and establishment of the objectives of the study. The second phase of the research
includes literature review. Literatures on construction defects in general, building defects in
particular, were reviewed.
The third phase of the research included a methodology of the thesis. The fourth phase of the
research includes result and discussion. In this phase the result of case study and questionnaires
were discussed. The last phase of the research includes the conclusions and recommendations.
3.4. Data collection

Both primary and secondary data were included in this research. Primary data were gathered from
observation, checklist and questionnaire with study participants such as consultants, contractors and
client & users. Secondary data used include literatures, reference books, journals, previous studies
etc. written on similar topic.
Check list, questionnaire used as a checklist for case study, was prepared to gather data for the
most common types of construction defects and their causes. Questionnaire was developed and
distributed to consultants, contractors, and client and building users. The questionnaire was close
ended and general and were helpful as an additional guidance in the inspection process. On the
active projects, sites visit was done as much as possible on the process of construction.
The study has used the data sources to produce the following basic documents: respondents‟
documents and case study documents. The respondents‟ documents were collected using
questionnaire from client and end users, contractors and consultants. Case study documents were
mostly from both completed and active projects, in which site observation was done.
3.5. Sampling Method

To generalize validity of the findings from a sample to all area of the research, samples were
drawn from the Federal Government Office Building Projects in Addis Ababa. For case study
seven buildings were investigated. Method of sampling used was random sampling. Samples
were categorized to two based on status, completed and under construction, because defects are
manifested as age of building increase four buildings were randomly selected from completed
buildings and the remaining three buildings were randomly selected from under construction
buildings.
For the second part of the study, survey study, questionnaires were developed and distributed to
all consultants, contractors, clients and users engaged on federal government office buildings
were addressed. And to assure the quality of data only professionals which have engineering
knowledge were included.
3.6. Questionnaire used in the research

The methodology used for this study was using case study and questionnaire. For case study
checklist having 74 factors, 70 types of construction defects and 4 causes of construction defect,
was developed. Then thorough site visit was done on selected seven building. For survey study a
questionnaire of 91 factors was carefully designed from literatures conducted in building
construction projects. It was organized in the form of a priority scaling (1 = strongly disagree, 2
= disagree, 3 = neutral, 4 = agree, and 5 = strongly agree and 1 = not important, 2 = less
important, 3 = moderately important, 4 = important, and 5 = very significant).
The procedure used in analyzing the results aimed at establishing the mean score of the various
parameters of construction defects. The score for each factor is calculated by summing up scores
assigned to it by respondents. Therefore, the level of importance as indicated by the client & end
users, contractors and consultants were used to measure the mean score of each factor.
The mean score (MS) for each variables of construction defect was computed by using the
following formula;
Msi = Σ (f*s)/N …………………………………………………… Equation 3.1

Where; s = score given to each type, effect & reducing measure of construction defect by
respondents;
f = frequency of responses to each type, effect & reducing measure of construction defect;
N = total number of responses in the respective type, effect & reducing measure of construction
defect.
Weighted Average was calculated by using the following formula;

Weighted Avg. = waxa + wbxb + wcxc ……………………………. Equation 3.2
Where; w= relative weight (%)
x= mean score
a, b & c represent client & end users, contractor and consultant respectively
The Spearman (rho) rank correlation coefficient was used for measuring the differences in
ranking between two groups of respondents scoring for various factors (i.e. clients versus
consultants, clients versus contractors, and consultants versus contractors).
The Spearman (rho) rank correlation coefficient for any two groups of ranking is given by the
following formula [28].
Rho (ρcal) = 1 – 6 x (Σd ) ……………………………………………… Equation 3.3
2
i
N x (N2– 1)
Where:
Rho (ρcal) – Spearman rank correlation coefficient
di– The difference in ranking between respondent for each factors
N– Number of factors (variables)
Procedure for hypothesis testing:
1. Define the null hypothesis (H0) and the alternative hypothesis (HA)
2. Choose a value for ρ. (i.e. choose the significance level)

3. Calculate the value of the test statistic, Rho (ρcal).
4. Compare the calculated value with a table of the critical values of the test statistic.
5. If the calculated value of the test statistic is less than the critical value from the table, accept
the null hypothesis (H0). If the absolute (calculated) value of the test statistic is greater than or
equal to the critical value from the table, reject the null hypothesis (H0) and accept the
alternative hypothesis (HA).
This was used to check the level of agreement between different groups of respondent during
assigning score for different factors of the questionnaire. This was clearly mentioned on the
analysis part of the research.
3.6.1. Questionnaire approach

A questionnaire was developed to assess the perceptions of client and end users, consultants, and
contractors due to the importance index of causes and effects of construction defects in Federal
Government Office Building Projects in Addis Ababa. Types, causes, effects & reducing
measures of construction defects in building construction projects in general were first examined
and identified through a relevant literature review and then by preparing questionnaire the case
was assessed in Federal Government Office Building Projects in Addis Ababa.
3.6.2. Questionnaire design

From literature review it has been discussed about types, causes, effects & reducing measures of
construction defects in building projects in various countries around the world and at intervals of
time, but not all of these types, causes, effects & reducing measures of construction defects in
Federal Government Office Building Projects in Addis Ababa, so it has been selected (91)
factors that has an impact in Addis Ababa projects.
The questionnaire questions 70 types of construction defect, 4 causes of construction defect, 8

effects of construction defect and 13 defect reducing measures. The respondents were asked to
fill the questionnaire and they were assured that the information will be confidential and used
only for research purpose only.
The questionnaire included four parts that are related to types, causes, effects & reducing
measures of construction defects in Addis Ababa construction projects, these parts are
respondent profile, types and cause of construction defect, effect of construction defect and
defect reducing measures.
3.6.3. Respondent profile

Four items were prepared for obtaining information about respondents‟ organization such as the
name of organization, company type (client, consultant or contractor) and respondents‟ job
position. (The questionnaire is included in annex 1)
3.6.4. Types and causes of construction defect

This part of questionnaire consist of 8 categories related to types of construction defect, the
categories included 70 types of construction defect, these categories are Foundation related
defect; Basement, Beams, Column & Slab related defect; Ceilings, walls, floors, doors and
windows related defect; Roof related defect; Water supply system related defect; Electrical
system related defect; Fire system related defect; Lift & Escalator related defect; Air
condition/Heating system related defect. (The questionnaire is included in annex 1).
3.6.5. Effects of construction defect

This part illustrates the effects of construction defects in building construction project, these
factors are the harvest of previous studies and literatures written in similar areas. A total of 8
factors were included in this part. (The questionnaire is included in annex 1).
3.6.6. Construction defect reducing measures

This part illustrates construction defect reducing measures in building construction projects, and
similar to effects of construction defect these factors were the harvest of previous studies and
literatures written in similar areas. A total of 13 factors were included in this part. (The
questionnaire is included in annex 1).
3.7. Respondents‟ attitude measurement

In this research, Likerts‟ ordinal scales were used to measure respondent attitude. Ordinal scale is
a ranking or a rating data that normally uses integers in ascending or descending order. The
numbers assigned to the agreement or degrees of influence (1, 2, 3, 4 and 5) do not indicate that
the intervals between scales are equal nor do they indicate absolute quantities. They are merely
numerical labels. Below are Likerts‟ scale used in this research.
Table 3.2: - Scales that represent level of agreement

Chances of Strongly Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly
occurrence Agree Disagree
Scale 5 4 3 2 1
Table 3.3: - Scales that represent level importance

Chances of Very Important Moderately Less Not
occurrence Important Important Important Important
Scale 5 4 3 2 1
3.8. Analysis and Interpretation

Analysis of data collected using check list, questionnaire and reports was done. Based on the
analysis there were in depth discussions on the analysis and then finally conclusions were made
from the discussion made in the research and recommendations are given for reducing construction
defects. In addition some areas of further research were suggested.
Chapter Four: Results and Discussion

4.1. Introduction
This chapter describes the results and discussion of case study and questionnaire survey
concerning types, causes, effects and reducing measure of construction defects in Federal
Government Building Projects in Addis Ababa from contractors, consultants and client
viewpoints. The effects of construction defect on the various stakeholders, on the construction
industry, and on the national economy in general were dealt. Finally lists of proposed measures
to reduce construction defects were included.
For case study four completed & three under construction a total of seven federal government
buildings in Addis Ababa were surveyed, method of sampling was addressed in chapter three
(their profile is attached in appendix B). Case study was done by developing checklist to gather
data on types and causes of construction defects. During the case study thorough site observation
of each building was done and besides to that start of construction, method of construction,
completion time and schedule of maintenance of each project was investigated. These were done
because construction defects are manifested with age of building, defective method of
construction and poor maintenance.
For survey parts of the research questionnaire was developed and distributed to all clients,
contractors, consultants & end users of Federal Government Building Projects were included.
Their experiences in area of construction defect were investigated. Finally comparison was done
between case study & survey study.
4.2. Result and analysis of the case study

During case study which was done on seven buildings and organized in table 4.2 and
summarized in table 4.1, a total of 73 construction defects were recorded. Water seepage from
external wall, roof, or from ceiling and non-structural crack were the most frequent types of
construction defects observed in all case study buildings. Most of the time moisture becomes a
danger to building and it can create plenty of problems and might cause building failure.
Building resistance to moisture seepage should be enhanced by using different mechanisms. Like
providing damp proofing materials at areas which will often experience moisture. Not only the
mechanism but also method of construction for damp proofing work is very important to tackle
moisture leakage. This is because usually this type of defect is attributed to poor workmanship.
Non- structural crack, usually shrinkage crack, is common in building projects and attributed to
poor workmanship. The next frequent defect was broken or loose tiles on floors or wall at toilet and
it was observed in 5 buildings. Material quality and method of lining are important for even floor
lining finish. This type of defect was observed at area which experienced relatively larger traffic
which means not this defect was attributed by large traffic rather this defect was attributed by
poor lining of tiles. Three defects, broken or leaking fixtures; defective damp proofing at the roof
and poor window frame finish were the third frequent defect with frequency rate of 4 buildings.
On occupant buildings defective ceramic wall & floor finish at toilet, defective floor drain at
toilet, defective floor finish and poor sanitary fixture were frequent defects. On active projects
defective & honeycombing concrete and defective sanitary & electric installation were frequent
defects.
Case study analysis showed that 67.8% of the defects were attributed by poor workmanship,
19.7% of the defects were caused by design error. The remaining 8.2% and 4.3% of the defects
were attributed by defective material & improper usage respectively.
Table 4.1: - Summary of construction defect from case study
Observed defect Frequency Rank
Water seepage from external wall, window, roof, or from ceiling 7 1

Non-structural cracks 7 1
Broken or loose tiles on floors or wall at toilet. 5 2
Broken or leaking fixtures 4 3
Defective damp proofing at the roof 4 3
Poor window frame finish 4 3
Defective floor drains at toilet 3 4
Broken Turkish toilet basin 3 4
Defective skirting 3 4
Water leakage from lift case 3 4
Defective waste water drainage system 3 4
Defective floor finishing 3 4

Defective & Honeycombing concrete 3 4
Uneven floor 2 5
Improper electric conduit installation 2 5
Improper installed drainage down pipe 2 5
Electrical system break down 1 6
Defective fire system equipment 1 6
Defective water pump 1 6
Lack of gate valve that control each toilet room. 1 6
Broken gutter 1 6
Improper junction box location 1 6
Some of the defects, which is important to be explained and respective causes are described
below the remaining defects with sources, causes and symptoms of them are summarized in table
4.2.
1. Water seepage through window frames and unpleasant odor
Water seepage through window frame and unpleasant odor was frequent defect in old buildings.
In old buildings of mentioned projects window frame used was PVC. This material exhibit
dimensional instability when exposed to external weather. Because window is external building
parts usually exposed to sunlight, rain and etc.
Fluctuation of temperature causes PVC to exhibit dimensional change and this behavior of PVC
cause to loosen window frame connection with wall. Through time tiny openings will be created
between window frame and wall and through that opening moisture will leak. The same
phenomenon observed on these projects. Similarly, when PVC exposed to sunlight make
unpleasant odor and this make occupant unhappy. Long time exposure might cause health
problem, like cancer.
This defective was attributed by poor material selection but might be enhanced by defective
window frame construction. Because of complaint from users of old building and bad reputation
of PVC as a window frame in construction industry, PVC window frame of current building
projects was changed to aluminum window frame. In old buildings too it was replaced by
aluminum frame.
2. Sewerage line blockage
Typical sewer system of old buildings (Ministry of Health, Ministry of Agriculture and Custom
and Revenue Authority) was as follow in the Fig 4.1 below. As shown on the figure after the
sludge entered to the septic tank at the inlate allowed passing through compartments with aiming
to trap solid waste & letting the water to the soak away pit and there through filtration it joins to
ground water. In rainy season the ground water table is raised and it filled the soak away pit.
When this happen the soak away pit is no more in function and flowing of water to soak away pit
was blocked, then the compartments being full. Finally the sewer line stops functioning.
Inlate
Compartment I
Compartment II
Out late
Compartment III
Septic tank
Soak away pit II Soak away pit I
Municipality sewerage line
Soak away pit
Fig 4.1: – Typical sewerage line
This type of defect was observed in all three buildings. At Custom and Revenue Authority the
problem was not because of ground water table raising rather it was because the septic tank and
soak away pits were constructed in hard rock. As shown in the fig 4.2 the water flowing to soak
away pit cannot drain to the ground rather it drained to the surface
Fig 4.2: – Sludge drains to

the surface
At Ministry of health the problem was solved by connecting building sewer line directly to
municipality sewer line. At Ministry of Agriculture and Custom and Revenue Authority the
problem was not solved and the proposed temporary solution was sucking the waste. Also the
client proposed permanent solution which is connecting the sewer line to municipality sewer line
at the locality. But this will work if and only if city administration constructs sewer line at that
locality. For remaining project design modification was done, connecting building sewer line to
municipality sewer line.
The cause of such a defect was design error, not considering the sub-soil condition of the area
during design stage of the projects and at the construction stage
3. Defective floor finish
This type of defect was observed at many case study buildings, where floor finish is ceramic
floor tile. The defect was break down of ceramic floor tile after getting loose. This problem was
observed at area which experienced relatively larger traffic which means not this defect was
attributed by large traffic rather this defect was attributed by poor lining of tiles as a result of
defective method of construction. Similar problem was observed at toilet wall finish there the
ceramic tiles become loose and then fallen down. Unfortunately the same defect was observed in
recent projects too. For clarity bellows are pictures captured at these building
Fig 4.3: – Loosen floor tile Fig 4.4: – Fallen ceramic wall tile
The method of construction adapted was after chiseling the floor pour 1:3 cement to sand ratio
mortar then fix tile on it. According to senior site engineers, this method of construction requires
highly experienced workmanship unless otherwise it is difficult to attain level surface beneath
the tile which in turn after continuous trafficking cause tile break. According to senior engineers
the method of construction which will reduce this problem was leveling the sand first to required
lift thickness then pour the paste on it finally tiles should be laid on it. This method of
construction is good for drain too. For under construction projects this method was adapted.
4. Water leakage to lift case
Water leakage to lift case was among one of common defects observed in case study building.
This defect was observed in buildings constructed respectively in low areas and the defect was
seasonal. In rainy season, when the ground water raised, the water leaks to the lift case. Then
cause frequent lift stoppage and electric shock.
This defect was attributed by design error, poor soil investigation, which was manifested in low
capacity water proofing material selection. Asphalt lining in the internal part of the lift case was
applied as water proofing material but because the pressure is relatively high the water easily
leaks to the lift case. Instead membrane lining or cementitious waterproofing materials have high
water resisting capacity. Other possible cause to this problem was not providing drain pipe at the
periphery masonry of the building. As shown in the figure below the lift case was filled with
water. The solution proposed and expected to be implemented soon is lining water proofing
materials in layers to the internal parts of the lift case.
Fig 4.5: - Lift case filled with water
5. Defective floor drain
It is common to experience floor drain problem in many buildings in Addis Ababa. And this
defect was observed in case study projects. The defect occurred because of poor floor finish at
the toilet, not providing optimum slope which can lets the water flow to floor drain. The water
dripped from hand wash basin and urine set accumulate on the floor then cause unpleasant odor.
This defect was attributed by poor workmanship.
The solution proposed to this problem was after removing the existing ceramic floor tiles adjust
the slope then providing a floor finish.
6. Unpleasant odor spell out from floor drain
Unpleasant odor coming out from floor drain was observed in old case study buildings; there the
floor drain was not constructed by providing S-trap. This problem happened because of
fermentation of sewage at septic tank. During fermentation (chemical reaction which forms
gases) gases have been produced and then search opening to escape. During this journey the
gases come to water closet and floor drains before reaching a tube, which was constructed for
this purpose. At water closet the gases were entrapped by water at S-trap but it escaped from
floor drain.
Fig 4.6: - Defective floor drain
The possible cause of such a defect was design error, not providing S-trap at floor drains during
design. Also the contractor should be responsible for this defect because the contractor shall
notice such obvious design error. The possible solution to this problem was re-constructing floor
drain by providing S-trap.
7. Frequent stoppage of electric power
Frequent stoppage of electric power is type of defects on building service. In case study
buildings it was observed. The cause to frequent electric stoppage was unbalance of electric
power provided and required. Provided electric power was less than required. Usually this type
of defect was attributed by design error, poor estimation of required electric power.
The designer blames the client on bases of that it was not given the estimated number of building
users. Interview held with client representative assure the blame was right. According to the
interviewed majority of buildings constructed by Federal Government Building Project Office
have similar typology which was adapting a single design. That is incorrect because every
project is unique by itself, situation which work on one building might not work on other. So,
building end users shall participate on the project starting from design stage. The solution
implemented was installing a new electric system that can supply required electric power. Some
parts of the previous electric line were demolished.
8. Water seepage from external wall, roof, toilet or from ceiling
Water seepage to internal parts of a building was the most frequent type of defect observed in
case study buildings. The defect occurred because of poor prevention of moisture. Most of the
time moisture becomes danger to building and it can create plenty of problems and might cause
building failure. Building resistance to moisture seepage should be enhanced by using different
mechanisms. Like providing damp proofing materials at areas which often experience moisture.
Not only the mechanism but also method of construction for damp proofing work is very
important to tackle moisture leakage. It is difficult to stop moisture leakage but it can be reduced
by implementing defect free construction.
Observed defective prevention areas were at parapet wall, roof & external wall. There the
copping, damp proofing & external wall finishing were defective. Literarily this defect was
attributed by poor workmanship. Small portion of this defect might be caused by improper usage
of building service, like putting large mass on the top of the roof and accumulations of dusts at
gutter openings. Below are figures taken from defective building. For ease of understanding the
remaining defects were tabulated next to it.
Fig 4.7: – dust accumulated at gutter opening Fig 4.8: – Fractured water proofing membrane
Fig 4.9: – Ceiling leakage Fig 4.10: – Roof slab leakage
Table 4.2: – List of construction defects on case study projects

No. Project Observed defect Symptoms Main causes
Name
Broken or loose tiles on floors or Departing and falling down of Poor

wall at toilet. ceramic tiles from wall, Water workmanship
stagnating on the floor
Defective floor drains at toilet Unpleasant odor because of not Poor
providing S-trap & nonfunctional workmanship &
Design
Broken or leaking fixtures Water dripping at fixtures Poor
workmanship
Broken Turkish toilet basin Water & waste flows out to floor Defective
at the time of flushing material
Defective skirting Loosen & fallen down of skirting Poor
workmanship
Electrical system breakdown Nonfunctional & loose light Defective
point material
Non-functioning of fire system Nonfunctional fire hose mostly Poor
equipment because of can't get water from workmanship
the reservoir
Defective water pump Nonfunctional water pump Defective
Ministry of
1 material
Health
Water seepage from external Water staining, Peeling off of Poor
wall, roof, toilet or from ceiling paint or wall paper, Water workmanship
dripping, Defective concrete,
plaster or tile, Rust staining
Water leakage to lift case Lift case filled with water Design error
Non-structural cracks Hairline cracks, Multi-directional Poor
cracks (shrinkage cracks), Cracks workmanship
between walls and structural
elements
Lack of gate valve that control Difficulty at time of maintenance Design error
each toilet room.
Defective waste water drainage Unpleasant odor, toilet basin Poor
system getting filled, Nonfunctional workmanship
septic tank, Nonfunctional soak
away pit
Defective damp proofing at the Water staining, Peeling off of Loading a big
roof paint or wall paper, Water mass at the roof &
dripping, un proper usage

Name
providing S-trap & non workmanship &
functional Design error
Broken or leaking fixtures Water dripping at fixtures Poor
workmanship
Broken or loose tiles on floors Loosen & broken down of floor Poor
tile workmanship
Broken gutter Nonfunctional gutter Un proper usage
wall, roof, or from ceiling paint or wall paper, Water workmanship
Water leakage from lift case Lift case filled with water Design error
Ministry of Non-structural cracks Hairline cracks, Multi-directional Poor
2 Agricultur cracks (shrinkage cracks), workmanship
e Cracks between walls and
structural elements
Defective damp proofing at the Water staining, Peeling off of Loading a big
roof paint or wall paper, Water mass at the roof,
dripping, poor
maintenance &
un proper usage
system getting filled, workmanship
Electric system breakdown Frequent stoppage of electric Design error

power
Poor window frame finish Water seepage through window Defective
frames and bad odor material, poor
workmanship

Name
providing S-trap & non workmanship &
functional poor design
Poor sanitary system fixture Water dripping at fixtures Poor
workmanship
Uneven floor Loosen & broken down of floor Poor
tile workmanship
Poor window frame finish Water seepage Poor
workmanship
wall, roof, or from ceiling paint or wall paper, Water workmanship
Custom &
3 Revenue Water leakage from lift case Lift case filled with water Design error
Authority Non-structural cracks Hairline cracks, Multi-directional Poor
cracks (shrinkage cracks), workmanship
Cracks between walls and
structural elements
Defective damp proofing at the Water staining, Peeling off of Poor

balcony paint or wall paper, Water workmanship
dripping,
system getting filled, Nonfunctional workmanship
septic tank, Nonfunctional soak
away pit
workmanship
Improper junction box location Number of socket lines on the Design error
floor

Name
Poor sanitary system fixture Water dripping at fixtures Poor
workmanship
Uneven floor Loosen & broken down of floor Poor
tile workmanship
wall, window, roof, or from paint or wall paper, Water workmanship
Ministry of
ceiling dripping, Defective concrete,
4 Foreign
Affairs

cracks (shrinkage cracks), workmanship
structural elements

workmanship
Very think mortar under floor Poor
Uneven floors tile workmanship
Poor damp proof membrane Folding at parapet wall, Poor
lining accumulation of dusts workmanship
Untidy joints between window Gaps at window frame corner Poor
frame and wall workmanship
Defective & Honeycombing Exposed steel reinforcement, Poor
Ministry of concrete spalling of concrete workmanship
Foreign Water seepage from external Water staining Poor
5 Affairs wall, roof, or from ceiling workmanship
(Conferenc Non-structural cracks Hairline cracks, Multi-directional Poor
e Hall) cracks (shrinkage cracks), workmanship
structural elements
Improper electric conduit Demolishing the previous and Design error

installation then installing new line

Name
wall at toilet. ceramic tiles from wall workmanship
Defective stair marble flooring Loosen & broken marble at stair Poor
workmanship
Untidy joints between window Gaps at window frame corner, Poor
frame and wall rain water entering workmanship
concrete spalling of concrete workmanship
Water seepage from external Water staining Poor
Ministry of wall, roof, or from ceiling workmanship
6 Science & Non-structural cracks Hairline cracks, Multi-directional Poor
Technology cracks (shrinkage cracks), workmanship
structural elements
Fire system not included in the Chiseling for installation Design error
design
Defective electric conduit Demolishing the previous and Design error
installation then installing new line
Improperly installed drainage Chiseling at new installation Design error
down pipe point
concrete spalling of concrete workmanship
Water seepage from external Water staining Poor
wall, roof, or from ceiling workmanship
Urban
Integrated cracks (shrinkage cracks), workmanship
Land Cracks between walls and
7 Information structural elements
System
Developme
nt Chiseling the excess Poor
Uneven floors workmanship
Defective sanitary installation Sanitary line installed over Design error
concrete slab.
Improperly installed drainage Chiseling at new installation Design error
down pipe point
4.3. Results of Questionnaire Analysis

The types, causes, effects & proposed measure to reduce building defects from the questionnaire
survey were identified based on respondents‟ response on each type of construction defects.
Construction defects identified in different books & research outputs, as indicated in the
literature review part of this thesis, might not be the types of construction defect occurred in
federal government building projects, hence it is important to ask the respondents for their
agreement on each types of building defects, then this was accompanied by identification of
causes of construction defects based on their occurrence. Finally effects of construction defect &
measures should be adapted to reduce the impact of construction defect were identified based on
respondent response rate.
4.3.1. Population characteristics
This part mainly designed to provide general information about the respondents in terms of the
name of company type, position and experience of contact person.
4.3.1.1. Type of respondent‟s organization
In this study, 40% (16) owners & end users, 30% (12) contractors and 30% (12) consultants
participated in the questionnaire; method of selection was addressed in chapter three. The general
response rate for contractors, owners and consultants was 75% and the total numbers of
respondents for the three parties were 30 out of 40 expected respondents. The response rate of
contractors were 75 % (9 out of 12 respondents), for the owners & end users 75 % (12 out of 16
respondents) and 75 % (9 out of 12 respondents) for consultants.
Fig 4.11: – Questionnaire distributed Fig 4.12: – Questionnaire response rate
Table 4.3: - Respondent organization

Name of Respondent Questionnaire Questionnaire Response
Company Distributed Returned Rate
Client and End users 16 12 75%

Contractor 12 9 75%
Consultant 12 9 75%
4.3.1.2. Respondents job positions

Table 4.4 shows that 91.67 % (11) of clients & end users respondents were site engineers and
8.33 % (1) was project manager. It has been found that 22.2 % (2) of contractors respondents
were project managers, 77.8 % (7) were site engineers. It has been found that 88.8 % (8) of the
consultants respondents were resident engineers, 11.1 % (1) was assistant resident engineer.
Totally out of 30 respondents of the three parties, 60.0 % (18) of the respondents were site
engineers, 26.67 % (8) were resident engineers, 10.0 % (3) were projects managers and 3.33 %
(1) was assistant resident engineer.
Table 4.4: - Respondent job position
Respondents job positions Client and Contractor Consultant
End users
Resident engineer -- -- 8
Project manager 1 2 --
Assistant resident engineer -- -- 1
Site engineer 11 7 --
4.3.2. Types and causes of construction defect
4.3.2.1. Clients‟ view
Table 4.5 shows that clients & end users ranked broken or loose tiles on floors or wall as the
most frequent types of defect with a mean score of 4.45 which is also the most frequent defect
according to consultants with a mean score of 3.33. On the case study it was among frequent
defect. Usually this problem might be observed at area which experienced relatively larger traffic
which means not this defect was attributed by large traffic rather this defect was attributed by
poor lining of tiles. Sometimes this defect may be attributed by defective material. The next frequent
defect was water seepage through windows and doors with a mean score of 4.42. Even if contractors
ranked it 10th, in the opinion of consult it was the third frequent defect and on the case study it
was observed. Mostly this defect is attributed by poor workmanship, poor installation of window
and door frames. Water seeps through openings between window or door frame & wall or
window sill.
The third frequent defect in the opinion of client & end users was defective floor, wall & external
finish with a mean score of 4.25. This shows even the floor beneath broken tile (the most
frequent defect) was defective. Contractor didn‟t agree with this but consultants ranked as the
third frequent defect. On the case study it was the most frequent defect and cause of the defect is
poor workmanship. The fourth frequent defect was doors, hinges, and latch/lock mechanisms
needing adjustment or repair with a mean score of 4.17. Consultants & contractors didn‟t agree
with this, in opinion of them there are other defects which occur more frequently than this. This
defect occur either because of defective material or poor installation of window or door set. The
fifth frequent defects were shrinkage cracks on plastering and broken or leaking sanitary fixtures
both with a mean score of 4.08. Consultants agree with this even in the opinion of consultant the
third frequent defect. On the case study it was the most frequent defects observed on all
buildings. The cause of defects is poor workmanship. Broken or leaking sanitary fixtures at toilet
pose health problem on the tenants.
Client and end users ranked three defects as the sixth frequent defect with a mean score of 4.0,
floors moisture leakage, exposed steel reinforcements and defective shower or water fixtures.
These defects attributed by poor workmanship. The most frequent defects in the opinion of client
and end users were often caused by poor workmanship, this shows the causes are emerged from
labors & workforce employed by contractor.
4.3.2.2. Consultants‟ view
Table 4.5 shows that consultant ranked broken or loose tiles on floors or wall as the most frequent
types of defect with a mean score of 3.33 which is also the most frequent defect in the opinion of
client & end user with a mean score of 4.45. On the case study it was among frequent defect. The
causes of the defect was mostly because of poor workmanship, sometimes it may attributed by defective
material. The next frequent defect was floors moisture leakage with a mean score of 3.25. Even if
contractors ranked it 19th, in the opinion of client it was the 7th frequent defect and on the case
study it was observed. Mostly this defect is attributed by poor workmanship, poor concreting of
slabs.
Five defects ranked as the third frequent defect with a mean score of 3.17, water seepage through
windows & doors; defective floor, wall & external finish; shrinkage cracks on plastering; water
damage or stains on ceilings, walls or floors; structural cracks on floors and/or wall. The first two
were the 2nd & 3rd frequent defects in the opinion of client and often attributed by poor
workmanship. Causes of structural cracks on floors and/or wall are design error, defective
material or poor workmanship. This shows how frequent these defects are but contractors didn‟t
agree with consultants, contractors ranked above 10th.
Similar to client & end users, the most frequent defect in the opinion of consultant too often
attributed by poor workmanship. This shows contractor take a highest share on attributing
construction defects on building projects.
Table 4.5: - Types of defect from client & end users, consultant & contractor point of view
Client & Weighted

Contractor Consultant
Construction defect End user Average
Msi Rank Msi Rank Msi Rank Msi Rank
Broken or loose tiles on floors or wall 4.45 1 4.13 6 3.33 1 4.02 1
Water seepage through windows and doors 4.42 2 4.00 10 3.17 3 3.92 2
Defective floor, wall & external finish 4.25 3 3.88 19 3.17 3 3.81 3
Doors, hinges, latch/lock mechanisms needing 4.17 4 4.00 10 3.08 8 3.79 4
adjustment or repair
Shrinkage cracks on plastering 4.08 5 3.88 19 3.17 3 3.75 5
Broken or leaking sanitary fixtures 4.08 5 3.88 19 3.00 12 3.70 9
Floors moisture leakage 4.00 7 3.88 19 3.25 2 3.74 6
Exposed steel reinforcements 4.00 7 4.00 10 3.00 12 3.70 8
Defective shower or water fixtures 4.00 7 3.88 19 3.00 12 3.66 10
Non-structural cracks 3.92 10 3.88 19 3.00 12 3.63 11
Toilets not securely anchored 3.92 10 3.88 19 2.92 22 3.60 14
Lift occasional overrun 3.92 10 3.88 19 2.83 32 3.58 16
Honeycombing of concrete 3.83 13 4.00 10 2.75 39 3.56 19
Water damage or stains on ceilings, walls or floors 3.83 13 4.13 6 3.17 3 3.72 7
Paint peeling on façade faces of wall 3.83 13 4.00 10 2.92 22 3.61 13
Bathroom sinks not securely fastened or functioning 3.83 13 3.88 19 3.08 8 3.62 12
properly
Signs of leaks or clogged drains 3.75 17 3.88 19 2.83 32 3.51 21

Dampness on basements, beams, columns and/or 3.75 17 3.75 32 2.92 22 3.50 22
slabs
Non-functioning of fire resisting equipment 3.75 17 3.88 19 2.75 39 3.49 25
Detachment of plastering 3.67 20 4.00 10 3.00 12 3.57 17
Broken or damaged exterior doors, locks, handles or 3.67 20 4.25 1 2.83 32 3.59 15
hinges
Improperly sloped gutters 3.67 20 3.75 32 3.00 12 3.49 24
Defective lift & escalator functioning 3.58 23 3.75 32 2.75 39 3.38 29
Seepage or leakage underside of roof 3.58 23 4.00 10 2.83 32 3.48 26
Wall dimensional instability 3.50 25 4.25 1 2.92 22 3.55 20
Ceiling and wall joint separation 3.42 26 3.63 44 2.92 22 3.33 33
Displacement of walls 3.42 26 3.63 44 2.75 39 3.28 38
Broken window glazing, frames, locks or opening 3.42 26 4.25 1 3.08 8 3.57 18
mechanisms
Rainwater runoff from roof not channeled away 3.42 26 3.63 44 2.92 22 3.33 33
from entrances
Small cracks on basements, beams, columns and/or 3.33 30 4.13 6 3.08 8 3.50 23
slabs
Structural cracks on floors and/or walls 3.33 30 3.50 50 3.17 3 3.33 31
Straps missing or not nailed properly 3.33 30 3.75 32 2.92 22 3.33 32
Roof sagging 3.33 30 3.50 50 3.00 12 3.28 35
Sudden rise in water consumption 3.33 30 3.75 32 2.75 39 3.28 37
Lift & escalator stoppage 3.33 30 3.50 50 3.00 12 3.28 35
Ceiling unevenness and unevenly applied texture 3.25 36 4.00 10 3.00 12 3.40 28
Gutters clogged with debris 3.25 36 3.63 44 2.75 39 3.21 47
Insecurely fastened, damaged or missing gutter or 3.25 36 3.75 32 2.75 39 3.25 43
leader sections
Loose junction boxes for switches Or convenience 3.25 36 4.25 1 2.75 39 3.40 27
outlets
Electrical switches or outlets not working 3.25 36 4.25 1 2.67 50 3.38 30
Not cool enough and/or warm enough of air 3.25 36 3.50 50 2.67 50 3.15 52
conditioning
Noisy, no air movement of air conditioning 3.25 36 3.88 19 2.67 50 3.26 41
Poor functioning of heat system 3.25 36 3.63 44 2.67 50 3.19 49
Salt attack on structural members 3.17 44 3.50 50 2.75 39 3.14 53
Damaged roof sheathing 3.17 44 3.75 32 2.83 32 3.24 44
Roof cracking 3.17 44 3.50 50 2.75 39 3.14 53
Distortion of roof or wall at roof level 3.17 44 3.50 50 2.92 22 3.19 48
Inadequate pressure or water flow at fixtures 3.17 44 3.75 32 2.92 22 3.27 40
Stoppage of electrical supply 3.17 44 3.88 19 2.67 50 3.23 45
Uneven floors 3.08 50 3.63 44 3.00 12 3.22 46
Damaged roof trusses 3.08 50 3.50 50 2.92 22 3.16 51

Poor protection of service entrance electrical wires 3.08 50 4.13 6 2.67 50 3.27 39
Fire alarm not working 3.08 50 3.75 32 2.75 39 3.18 50
Electrical system breakdown 3.00 54 4.00 10 2.83 32 3.25 42
Stoppage of heating system 3.00 54 3.75 32 2.67 50 3.13 55
4.3.2.3. Contractors‟ view

Table 4.5 shows that contractor ranked five types of defect, broken or damaged exterior doors,
locks, handles or hinges; wall dimensional instability; broken window glazing, frames, locks or
opening mechanisms; loose junction boxes for switches or convenience outlets; electrical
switches or outlets not working as the most frequent types of defect with a mean score of 4.25,
which were ranked 8th and above by clients & end users and consultants. The majority of the
defects were caused by defective materials and some of the defects were attributed by poor
workmanship.
The next frequent defects in the opinion of contractor were broken or loose tiles on floors or wall
(The most frequent defect in the opinion of clients & end users); water damage or stains on
ceilings, walls or floors (the 3rd frequent defects in the opinion of consultant); small cracks on
basements, beams, columns and/or slabs; poorly protected service entrance electrical wires with
a mean score of 4.13. Often the causes are because of poor workmanship.
Similar to other respondent, the most frequent defect in the opinion of contractors too often
attributed by poor workmanship. This shows contractor witnessed on themselves, majority of
defects on building are caused because of contractor related fault.
Table 4.6 shows causes of construction defects according to respondent, client & end users said
58.16% of construction defect were caused by poor workmanship, 26.84% because of defective
material and the remaining 12.11% and 2.89% of construction defect were caused by design
error and poor subsurface investigation respectively. According to contractor 47.85% of
construction defects were caused by poor workmanship, 37.82% because of defective material
and the remaining 8.31% and 6.02% of construction defect were caused by design error and poor
subsurface investigation respectively. According to consultants 51.23% of construction defects
were caused by poor workmanship, 26.40% because of defective material and the remaining
18.79% and 3.58% of construction defect were caused by design error and poor subsurface
investigation respectively. Over all 52.41% of construction defects were caused by poor
workmanship, 30.35% were because of defective material and the remaining 13.07% and 4.16%
of construction defects were caused by design error and poor subsurface investigation
respectively.
Table 4.6: - Causes of defect from client & end users, consultant & contractor point of view
Causes of defect Client and Contractor Consultant Overall

End users (%) (%) Analysis
(%)
Design error 12.11 8.31 18.79 13.07
Workmanship error 58.16 47.85 51.23 52.41
Defective material 26.84 37.82 26.40 30.35
Poor subsurface investigation 2.89 6.02 3.58 4.16
Fig 4.13: – Causes of construction defects
4.3.3. Effects of construction defects
Table 4.7 shows that clients and end user ranked construction cost overrun as the biggest impacts
of construction defects with a mean score of 4.15. Hence, occurrences of construction defects
highly affect construction project budget. Contractors & consultants agree on that by ranking
construction cost overrun as the 3rd & 2nd effects of construction defect with a mean score of 4.13
& 4.25 respectively. Client & end users ranked project delay as next biggest impact with a mean
score of 4.42, which was the first according to contractors and consultants with a mean score
4.25 and 4.38 respectively. This shows occurrence of construction defect highly affect project
time. It causes the project to delay and then because of that the client forced to aside additional
budget for projects. Finally this may cause disputes between contracting parties.
Clients and end user ranked high maintenance cost as the third effects of construction defects
with a mean score of 4.33. This was ranked as 1st and 3rd according to contractors & consultants
with a mean score of 4.25 and 4.13 respectively. This shows client incurred additional expense
for maintenance because of construction defect, which might not be parts of original budget.
Often maintenance cost is not budgeted for project. Literarily, occurrences of construction
defects increase clients‟ expense on the project. The 4th effect of construction defect on sight of
client & end users was negatively affect contractor and/or consultant reputation with a mean
score of 4.08, this was the 4th and 8th effect in the opinion of contractor & consultant with a mean
score of 3.88 and 3.75 respectively. Defective construction firm will suffer bad reputation then
might lose competitiveness on market. Often construction firms are business companies, loss of
competitiveness forced companies to close, and then affect the industry.
Clients and end user ranked decrease the value of project & decrease project functionality as the
fifth effects of construction defects with a mean score of 4.00. Which were 5th & 4th and 8th and
6th in the opinion of contractors and consultants with a mean score of 3.25 & 4.00 and 2.88 &
3.88 respectively. Occurrence of construction defect reduces the value & functionality of
projects. And highly affects tenants and/or users comfort. Unlike types of construction defects
respondent shows some degree of agreement on effects of construction defects.
Table 4.7: - Effects of defect from client & end users, consultant & contractor point of view
Client & Weighted

Effects of construction defects End user Average
Construction cost overrun 4.50 1 4.13 3 4.25 2 4.31 2
Project delay 4.42 2 4.25 1 4.38 1 4.35 1
High maintenance cost 4.33 3 4.25 1 4.13 3 4.25 3
Negatively affect contractor and/or 4.08 4 3.88 4 3.75 8 3.92 4
consultant reputation
Decrease the value of project 4.00 5 3.25 5 4.00 4 3.78 5
Decrease project functionality 4.00 5 2.88 8 3.88 6 3.63 6
Risk of possible danger on the tenant 3.42 7 3.13 6 3.88 6 3.47 7
and/or passenger
High disputes and possible loss of 3.17 8 3.00 7 4.00 4 3.37 8
building
4.3.4. Defect reducing measures

Table 4.8 shows that clients and end user ranked periodic and regular construction site
supervision as very important measures to reduce occurrence of construction defects with a mean
score of 4.58, which was ranked 5th and 1st in the opinion of contractors and consultants with a
mean score of 4.13 and 4.75 respectively. This shows periodic and regular construction site
supervision is very important factor to reduce construction defects. Often consultants are
responsible for site supervision. Majority of defects were attributed by poor workmanship and
this problem might be highly reduced by periodic and regular construction site supervision.
Clients and end user ranked all building systems need to be coordinated concurrently, starting
with the planning phase and continuing into the programming and implementation phases as the
next important measure with a mean score of 4.50, which was the 1st and 6th important measure
in the opinion of contractors & consultants with a mean score of 4.38 and 4.38 respectively.
Construction projects require team works of different parties engaged on the project. So,
coordination of different stage of construction plays a vital role to reduce construction defects.
Implement a comprehensive quality control mechanism was ranked as the 3rd important measure
in the opinion of clients & end users to reduce occurrence of construction defects with a mean
score of 4.42, which was the 2nd according to contractor and consultants with a mean score of
4.25 and 4.63 respectively. This shows how quality control mechanism is important to reduce
construction defect on building projects. Contract documents shall fully incorporate quality
control mechanism in order to implement defect free construction and contractors shall
implement and consultants shall check its effectiveness. Increased and improved feedback to the
designer from all concerned bodies was ranked as the 4th important measure by clients & end
users to reduce occurrence of construction defects with a mean score of 4.08, contractors and
consultants ranked 7th and 4th with a mean score of 4.00 and 4.50 respectively. Architects &
engineers might make errors during design stage of projects, which might cause construction
defect unless otherwise revised. To reduce occurrence of construction defects designers should
receive feedbacks from contractors, client engineers or other concerned bodies.
The fifth important measure to reduce construction defect in the opinion of client & end users
was creating awareness to low-skilled laborers with a mean score of 4.00. Laborers are not
professionals and have little knowledge of engineering, so providing training before allowing
working on project is important to reduce occurrence of construction defects. Better and more
reliable guidance on commissioning building and their services and on defect avoidance;
developing capacity of universities and training institution were the 2nd important measures
according to contractors with a mean score of 4.25. Continuous evaluation of the capacity of
consulting and construction firm was ranked 2nd and regular on-the-job training was ranked as
the 4th important measure by consultants with a mean score of 4.63 and 4.50 respectively.
Table 4.8: - Building defect reducing measure from client & end users, consultant and
contractor point of view
Client & Weighted

Defect reducing procedures End user Average
Periodic and regular construction site 4.58 1 4.13 5 4.75 1 4.50 1
supervision
4.50 2 4.38 1 4.38 6 4.43 3
All building systems need to be
coordinated concurrently, starting with the
planning phase and continuing into the
programming and implementation phases.
Implement a comprehensive quality 4.42 3 4.25 2 4.63 2 4.43 2

control mechanism
Increased and improved feedback to the 4.08 4 4.00 7 4.50 4 4.18 4
designer from all concerned bodies
Creating awareness to low-skilled laborers 4.00 5 4.00 7 4.25 9 4.08 7
Proper and periodic maintenance 3.83 6 3.88 9 3.63 12 3.78 10
Regular on-the-job training 3.83 6 4.13 5 4.50 4 4.12 5
Better and more reliable guidance on 3.83 6 4.25 2 4.25 9 4.08 6
commissioning building and their services
and on defect avoidance
Continuous evaluation of the capacity of 3.83 6 3.75 11 4.63 2 4.05 9
consulting and construction firms
Develop the capacity of universities and 3.67 10 4.25 2 4.38 6 4.05 8
training institution
License cancelling of more frequent 3.25 11 3.13 13 2.75 13 3.06 13
defective construction organs
An improvement on the lowest tender 3.17 12 3.25 12 3.75 11 3.37 12
system
Improving the quality of graphical and 3.17 12 3.88 9 4.38 6 3.74 11
written communication
4.3.5. Tests for Agreements on Types, Effects and Reducing measures of

Construction Defect Among Stakeholders in the Construction Industry
One of the purposes of this thesis is to investigate whether there is an agreement or not on the
attitudes of stakeholders towards the types, effects & reducing measures of construction defects
in Federal Government Building Projects in Addis Ababa. Hence in this section respondents‟
response will be tested for correlation using Spearman rank correlation coefficients, to see if
there is difference in ranking between two groups of respondents; these are Clients & End users
versus Contractors; Contractors versus Consultants; and Clients & End users versus Consultants,
on the different variables of construction defect and their rate of occurrence.
The purpose of a hypothesis test is to avoid being deceived by chance occurrences. The tests also
helped to evaluate whether consensus of opinions exist among respondents.
The Null Hypothesis (HO) is: -There is no agreement in the ranking of types, effect & reducing
measures of construction defects between two groups of respondents.
The Alternative Hypothesis (HA) is: -There is agreement in the ranking of types, effect &
reducing measures of construction defects between two groups of respondents.
The spearman correlation coefficient (ρ) is calculated using Equation 3.3 and tabulated as shown
below in Table 4.9
In order to decide whether to accept or reject the null hypothesis, the level of significance 95%
(P = 0.05) is used. This allows to state whether or not there is "agreement" between respondents
response.
If the calculated value of ρ is greater than the critical value, H0 is rejected, i.e. there is evidence
of a statistically significant agreement between the groups. If the calculated value of ρ is less
than the critical value, H0 is accepted, i.e. there is no evidence of a statistically significant
agreement between the two groups.
Table 4.9: - Summary of correlation test on the ranking of types of construction defects
Respondents Rho (ρcal) = Critical value of ρ Significance for

1- 6*(Σdi2 ) (Appendix B ) P < 0.05
N*(N2- 1)
Client & end user Vs. Contractor 0.424 0.225 significant reject
Client & end user Vs. Consultant 0.604 0.225 significant reject
Contractor Vs. Consultant 0.162 0.225 significant accepted
In this case, with a significance level of 95% (P = 0.05), the calculated value of ρ for the first two
group cases are greater than the critical values of ρ, so the hypothesis that there is no significant
agreement between the respondents is rejected i.e. the null hypothesis is rejected and for the last
group case the calculated value of ρ less than the critical value of ρ, so the hypothesis that there
is no significant agreement between the respondents is accepted i.e. the null hypothesis is
accepted.
From table 4.9 above, it can be concluded that there is strong correlation between the attitudes of
clients & end users and contractors, clients & end users and consultants and hence the null
hypothesis should be rejected and the alternative hypothesis shall be accepted. This means that
the respondents on these groups have the same perception about types of construction defects. It
can be also concluded that there is no correlation between the attitudes of contractors and
consultants and hence the null hypothesis should be accepted. This means that contractors and
consultant have different perception about types of construction defects.
Table 4.10: - Summary of correlation test on the ranking of effects of construction defects
Respondents Rho (ρcal) = Critical value of Significance for
1- 6*(Σdi2 ) ρ (Appendix B ) P < 0.05
N*(N2- 1)
Client & end users Vs. Contractor 0.762 0.6429 significant reject
Client & end users Vs. Consultant 0.560 0.6429 significant accepted
In this case, with a significance level of 95% (P = 0.05), the calculated value of ρ for the first
agreement between the respondents is rejected i.e. the null hypothesis is rejected and for the
remaining two group case the calculated value of ρ less than the critical value of ρ, so the
hypothesis that there is no significant agreement between the respondents is accepted i.e. the null
hypothesis is accepted.
From table 4.10 above, it can be concluded that there is strong correlation between the attitudes
of clients & end users and contractors and hence the null hypothesis should be rejected and the
alternative hypothesis shall be accepted. This means that the respondents on these groups have
the same perception about effects of construction defects. It can be also concluded that there is
no correlation between the attitudes of clients & end users and consultants, contractors and
consultants and hence the null hypothesis should be accepted. This means that clients & end
users and consultants, contractors and consultants have different perception about effects of
construction defects.
Table 4.11: - Summary of correlation test on the ranking of defect reducing measures
Respondents Rho (ρcal) = Critical value of Significance for
1- 6*(Σdi2 ) ρ (Appendix B ) P < 0.05
N*(N2- 1)
Client & end users Vs. Contractor 0.563 0.4825 significant reject
Client & end users Vs. Consultant 0.574 0.4825 significant reject
In this case, with a significance level of 95% (P = 0.05), the calculated value of ρ for the first two
agreement between the respondents is rejected i.e. the null hypothesis is rejected and for the last
group case the calculated value of ρ less than the critical value of ρ, so the hypothesis that there
is no significant agreement between the respondents is accepted i.e. the null hypothesis is
accepted.
From table 4.11 above, it can be concluded that there is strong correlation between the attitudes
of clients & end users and contractors, clients & end users and consultants and hence the null
hypothesis should be rejected and the alternative hypothesis shall be accepted. This means that
the respondents on these groups have the same perception about reducing measures of
construction defects. It can be also concluded that there is no correlation between the attitudes of
contractors and consultants and hence the null hypothesis should be accepted. This means that
contractors and consultants have different perception about reducing measures of construction
defects.
4.4. Comparison between case study & survey analysis result
Analysis above clearly shows results of case study and questionnaire analysis. Result of case
study shows water seepage from external wall, roof, or from ceiling and non-structural crack
were the most frequent defects, which were the 2nd and 11th frequent defects on questionnaire
analysis respectively. But results of questionnaire analysis show broken or loose tiles on floors or
wall was the most frequent defect, which was the 2nd frequent defect on the case study. Broken or
leaking sanitary fixtures were in the first five lists of the most frequent defects in both case study and
questionnaire analysis. Defective damp proofing at the roof & poor window framing were the 5th
frequent defect on the case study. Doors, hinges, latch/lock mechanisms needing adjustment or repair
and shrinkage cracks on plastering were the 4th & 5th frequent defect on the questionnaire analysis.
Analysis of the case study shows 67.8% of the defects were attributed by poor workmanship,
19.7% of the defects were caused by design error. The remaining 8.2% and 4.3% of the defects
were attributed by defective material & improper usage respectively. While survey study shows
52.41% of construction defects were caused by poor workmanship, 30.35% were because of
defective material and the remaining 13.07% and 4.16% of construction defects were caused by
design error and poor subsurface investigation respectively.
In general, analysis of case study and survey study showed some degree of agreement both on
the types and causes of construction defects. Top five most frequent defects of case study and
questionnaire study were almost similar.
Similarly, results of both studies agree on causes of construction defects which were accordingly
the majority of construction defect in building projects were caused by poor workmanship. The
factors contribute to poor workmanship are:
 poor project management,
 complicated role of subcontractor,
 lack of experience and competency of labor,
 language barrier to communication and lack of communication,
 unsuitable construction equipment,
 poor weather condition,
 limited time and limited cost, etc.
Similarly measures that can reduce workmanship quality problem are:
 regular and periodic construction site supervision,
 training and education,
 proper communication among parties involved,
 proper construction management,
 proper manpower management and proper design,
And as the result of the analysis the most important measure to reduce occurrence of
construction defect is periodic and regular construction site supervision that is also reducing
measure to poor workmanship construction. Daily supervision should be carried out by the
contractors or subcontractors and resident engineer so that workmanship problem can be
identified and the remedy work can be executed immediately. Besides, when executing the
supervision, contractor supervisory staff must possess the knowledge, expertise, and capabilities
to administer the construction work.
Chapter five: Conclusion & Recommendation
5.1. Conclusion
Based on results from case study analysis and respondents analysis the following conclusions
were drawn by due attention to the objectives of the study.
 The first objective was to assess the extent of construction defect. By reviewing
literatures and research done on construction defect and site observation the extent of
construction defect was assessed. So, construction defect is a shortcoming in the function,
performance, statutory or user requirements of a building, and might manifest itself
within the structure, fabric, services or other facilities of the affected building.
 The second objective was to investigate types and causes of construction defects in
Federal Government Office Building Projects in Addis Ababa. From the results of the
thesis a total of 55 types of construction defect and 4 common causes of construction
defects were recorded. The first five most frequent types of construction defects on
mentioned project were; broken or loose tiles on floors or wall; water seepage from
external wall, roof, or from ceiling; broken or leaking sanitary fixtures; defective damp
proofing at the roof; poor window framing; nonstructural crack. Similarly the results
showed that the most common cause of construction defect was poor workmanship. At
least more than 58% of construction defect were attributed by poor workmanship.
Defective material takes the next role by causing almost 20% of construction defects.
Deign error cause just more than 15% of construction defects and the remaining defects
were caused by poor subsurface investigation and improper usage of building services.
 The third objective of the research was to investigate effects of construction defects on
Federal Government Office Building Projects in Addis Ababa. From the results of the
thesis a total of 8 effects of construction defect were recorded. Project delay ranked as the
highest effect of construction defects. The next effect was construction cost overrun. The
analysis ranked high maintenance cost as the 3rd highest effects of construction defects.
Construction defect negatively affect contractor and/or consultant reputation and
decreases the value of project were the remaining effects of construction defect in top
five list respectively.
 The fourth objective of the research was to forward measures which can decrease
occurrence of construction defect in Federal Government Office Building Projects in
Addis Ababa. From the results of the thesis a total of 13 construction defect reducing
measures were recorded. Periodic and regular construction site supervision was the most
important measure to decrease occurrence of construction defect. The next important
measure was implementing a comprehensive quality control mechanism. Concurrently
coordinating all building systems, starting with the planning phase and continuing into
the programming and implementation phases; increased and improved feedback to the
designer from all concerned bodies and regular on-the-job training were the remaining
defect reducing measures in top five lists.
5.2. Recommendations
The following points are recommended to all parties in order to reduce occurrence of
construction defects in building projects.
 Majority of construction defects occurred because of poor workmanship. So, skilled,

semi-skilled and unskilled laborers shall be trained on regular basis on stages of
construction in general and on method of construction, required quality level of
workmanship and quality of material in particular.
 Material supplier shall provide the right material as per the specification and contractor
have the responsibility to check the quality at the time of delivery and engineers shall
approve each material type before installing. This chain can reduce occurrence of
construction defects caused by defective materials.
 Designers should be aware that they have share on the cause of construction defects and
should up-to-date their design with the new technology and method of construction.
Designer shall receive feedbacks from concerned parties of the project.
 Better and more reliable guidance on commissioning building and their services and on
defect avoidance shall be developed. Project owner shall arrange awareness creation
program on way of using completed building services.
 Main parties of construction projects shall have continuous communication since first
stage of project, which will eliminate design discrepancies and errors as well as
omissions in design and also provide an opportunity to review the contract documents
thoroughly. This would help in reducing gaps between them.
 Lastly, pertaining to defective construction, professionals must ensure that they reduce
defective work within the industry. Competent people must be appointed to ensure that
the technical requirements are being met. Professionals must be familiar with the relevant
requirements of building standards and codes; if they are not, they must be educated or
trained. Experienced construction-industry professionals must be utilized to educate the
youth to ensure that lessons learnt in the past can be applied in future.
 This research was focused on types, causes, effects & reducing measures of construction
defects on Federal Government Office Building Projects in Addis Ababa. The owner of
projects is government and all the contractors & consultants are category I. Which means
financial shortage is not that much to the extent of degrading the quality of the projects
and the work was executed by category I firms but still there are plenty of construction
defects. Even if this is the case it is difficult to conclude every building works in Addis
Ababa were defective. So, it is recommended that researchers to work on construction
defect in private owned building projects and building works executed by other than
category I firms.
 The research output shows that the majority of construction defect in building projects
were attributed by poor workmanship. So, I recommend researchers to work on possible
solution for poor workmanship construction.
 Finally, it is important to do research on rework costs of defective acts. This is important

to show the magnitude of rework cost with respect to project cost. The finding of this
research might force concerned parties of the project to give due attention to construction
defects.
3. References
[1] Uk Construction Essay. (2013, Feburaruary). Retrieved September 2015, from UKessays:
http://www.ukessays.com/essays/construction/causes-of-the-construction-defect-construction-
essay.php
[2] A.Richardson, Barry (2002). Defect and Detrioration. 2nd ed., London & New York: Taylor
& Francis Group.
[3] Abdul-Rahman, H., Wang, C., Wood, L., & Khoo, Y. (2014) „Defects in Affordable Housing
Projects in Klang Valley, Malaysia‟, American Society of Civil Engineers, 28(2), 272-285.
[4] Barrett, K. (2008). Defective Construction Work. Chichester, United Kingdom: Wiley-
Blackwell.
[5] Cook, G. and Hinks, J. (2003). The Technology of Building Defects. London & New York:
Taylor & Francis Group.
[6] F.Atinkson, Michael. (2005). Structural Defects Reference Manual for Low-rise Building .
London & New York: Taylor & Francis Group.
[7] FindLaw. (2012). FindLaw, Types of construction defects. Retrieved October 15, 2014, from
FindLaw: http://www.realstate.findlaw.com/construction-defect/types-of-construction-
defects.html
[8] M.A. Othuman Mydin, N.A. Agus Salim, S.W. Tan, N.M. Tawil and N. Md Ulang. (2014)
„Assessment of Significant Causes to School Building Defects‟, EDP Sciences, 7, available at
http://www.e3s-conferences.org [accessed 25 September 2014]
[9] Macarulla, M., Forcada, N., Casals, M., Gangolells, M., Fuertes, A., & Roca, X. (2013).
„Standardizing Housing Defects: Classification,Validation and Benefits‟, American Society of
Civil Engineers, 139(8), 968-976.
[10] N. Ahzahar & N. Karim. (2011) „A Study of Contribution Factors to Building Failures‟,
Sciencedirect Journal, 20(1), 249-255.
[11] Forcadaa, N., Macarulla, M., Gangolells, M. and Casals, M. (2014) „Assessment of
Construction Defects in Residential Building In Spain‟, Building Research & Information, 42(5),
629-640.
[12] Douglas, J. and Ransom, B. (2007). Understanding Building Failure. 3rd ed., London &
New York: Taylor & Francis group.
[13] Sommerville, J. (2007) „Defect and Rework in New Buildings‟, Browse Journals and
Books, 25(5), 391-407.
[14] A.S. Ali & K. H. Wen (2011) „Building Defects: Possible solution for poor construction
workmanship‟, Journal of Building Performance, 2(1), 59-69.
[15] Kamal, K.S. (2001). Defects in Historic Buildings. MSc dissertation University Of
Portsmouth UK: UK. Portsmouth
[16] Product, E., (2012). My foundation repairs. Retrieved October 2014, from Doors & Window
problems: http://www.myfoundationrepairs.com/sticking-doors-windows
[17] Nurul Nadia Omar Bakri, Md Azree Othuman Mydin. (2014). General Building Defects:
Causes, Symptoms and Remedial Work. European joural of technology & design, 3(1), 4-17.
[18] Chin-man, L. (2002) „Building Maintenance Guidebook‟ Hong Kong: Hong Kong Building
Department.
[19] Encyclopedia, E. Engineering Encyclopedia. Retrieved November 2014, from Engineering

Encyclopedia: http://www.enggpedia.com/civil-engineering encyclopedia/dictionary/building-
construction.
[20] F. Buys & M le Reox (2013) „Causes of defects in the South African housing construction
industry: Perceptions of built-environment stakeholders‟ African journals online, 20(2), 4-18.
[21] NUR DIYANA BINTI MD.KASIM (2009). Building Defect: Case Study at Taman Seri
Indah, Permatang, Malaysia. BSc thesis University of Malysia: Pahang, Malaysia.
[22] Hamad A., Aljassmi & Sangwon Han (2014) „Classification and occurrence of defective
acts in residential construction projectss‟, Journal of Civil engineering and Management, 20(2),
175-185.
[23] Negussie, D. A. (2012) „Assesment of Causes of Concrete Defects in Building Construction

Projects in Addis Ababa‟, MSc dissertation Addis Ababa Institute of Technology: Addis Ababa,
Ethiopia.
[24] G.Naoum, Shamil (1998). Dissertation writing for construction students, 3rd ed., London &
New York: Taylor & Francis Group.
[25] Fellows, R. & Liu, A. (1997). Research methods for construction, 2nd ed., United Kingdom:
John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
[26] Royal geographical society. (2012). Spearman‟s Rank Correlation Coefficient. Retrieved
October 2015: http://www.rgs.org
Appendix A: Profiles of selected project
Project name: ------------------------- Ministry of Agriculture

Location ------------------------------- Megenagna, Addis Ababa
Client ---------------------------------- Ministry of Urban, Housing Development and Construction
Contractor: ---------------------------- Giga Construction Plc
Consultant: -----------------------------MH Engineering
Original contract amount: ---------- Birr 32,211,934.45
Variation amount: ------------------- Birr 2,443,888.00
Total amount: ------------------------ Birr 34, 655,822.45
Contract time: ------------------------ 18 months
Commencement date: --------------- April 4, 2007
Project completion date: ------------ October 4, 2009
Current status: ------------------------ Completed
Actual project completed date: ----- September 15, 2010
Schedule of maintenance: ----------- No
Project name: ------------------------- Ministry of Health

Location --------------------------------Goma quteba, Addis Ababa
Contractor: ----------------------------- Samuel H/Mariam Building Contractor

Total amount: ------------------------ Birr 335,888,356.11
Project completed date: ------------ October 4, 2009
Actual project completed date: ----- October 10, 2010
Project name: ------------------------- Custom and revenue authority

Location --------------------------------Megenagna, Addis Ababa
Contractor: ----------------------------- Emnetu Endeshaw Building Contractor

Project completed date: ------------ October 4, 2009
Actual project completed date: ----- October 4, 2010
Project name: ------------------------- Ministry of foreign affairs

Location --------------------------------Hilton area, Addis Ababa
Contractor: ----------------------------- Prefabricated Building Parts Production Enterprise

Commencement date: --------------- February 6, 2008
Project completed date: ------------ September 6, 2011
Actual project completed date: ----- June 23, 2012
Project name: ------------------------- Ministry of foreign affairs conference hall

Location --------------------------------Hilton area, Addis Ababa
Contractor: ----------------------------- Rama construction
Consultant: ----------------------------- Muluget Asfaw Consulting Architects & Engineers
Commencement date: --------------- September 6, 2012
Project completion date: ------------ March 6, 2014
Current status: ------------------------ 65%
Project name: ------------------------- Ministry of Science & Technology

Location --------------------------------Commercial printing, Addis Ababa
Contractor: ----------------------------- Prefabricated Building Parts Production Enterprise
Consultant: ----------------------------- ETG Designers & Consultants
Commencement date: --------------- May 16, 2012
Project completion date: ------------ November 7, 2013
Current status: ------------------------ 73%
Project name: ------------------------- Urban Integrated Land Information System Development

Location --------------------------------National theatre, Addis Ababa
Contractor: ----------------------------- Teklebirhan Ambaye construction
Consultant: ----------------------------- Defense consulting enterprise
Variation amount: ------------------- Birr 0.000
Commencement date: --------------- August 11, 2014
Project completion date: ------------ February 2, 2016
Current status: ------------------------ 50%
Appendix B: Questionnaire
Addis Ababa University
Addis Ababa Institute of Technology
M.sc thesis on Construction Technology & Management
Dear respondent,
I am a postgraduate student in stream of Construction Technology & Management in Addis

Ababa Institute of Technology, School of civil & Environmental Engineering. I am conducting a
research with a topic “A study of Construction Defects in Public Building Projects: A case study
of Federal Government Office Building Projects”
Now a day building construction defect become a problem that the construction industry faces.
Among the things that worsen the problems is lack of awareness on the area of construction
defect. Hopefully, the result of this study will reduce the problem, for that your experience on
this area is a good input.
Here are list of questionnaires expected to be answered by respondent. As with all Knowledge
Networks surveys, your response to this survey, or any individual question on the survey, is
completely voluntary. You will not be individually identified and your responses will be used for
statistical purposes only.
If you have questions related to the study please don‟t hesitate to contact me at +251920813939
or through email address mskmslbzbb@gmail.com. Thank you for your collaboration.
SECTION ONE: RESPONDENT PROFILE
1. Name (optional): ________________________________________________
2. Which organization are you working currently?
 Client
 Contractor
 Consultant
 Other (specify) :
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
3. What is your job position in your organization (optional)?
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
SECTION TWO: Questions Related to Types of Construction Defects in Federal

Government Office Building Projects
2.1. Below are lists of construction defects which are noticed during assessment on Federal
Government Office Building Projects. From your experience on these projects, please tick your level
of agreement on the listed construction defects and the possible causes. (Please tick the approximate
cell).
Agreement:
1 - Strongly agree 3 - Neutral, 5 – Strongly disagree
2 - Agree 4 - Disagree
Cause:
1 – Design error 3 – Defective material
2 – Workmanship error 4 – Poor subsurface investigation
Agree Cause
No. Defect type
1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4
1 Foundation related defect
Settlement
Subsidence
Tree root defects
Basement, Beams, Column &
2
Slab
Active cracks (>1.5mm) on
basements, beams, columns and/or
slabs
Small cracks (<1.5mm) on
basements, beams, columns and/or
slabs
Excessive deflection on beams
and/or slabs
Spalling of concrete from slabs,
beams and/or columns
Dampness on basements, beams,
columns and/or slabs
Exposed steel reinforcements
Salt attack on structural members
Honeycombing of concrete
Floors moisture leakage
Twisted and buckled columns

Twisted beams
Uneven floors
Ceilings, walls, floors, doors and
3
windows
Water damage or stains on ceilings,
walls or floors
Ceiling unevenness and unevenly
applied texture
Ceiling and wall joint separation
Structural inadequacy of floors
Structural cracks on floors and/or
walls
Non-structural cracks
Defective floor, wall & external
finish
Doors, hinges, latch/lock
mechanisms needing adjustment or
repair
Broken or loose tiles on floors or
wall
Detachment of plastering
Wall dimensional instability
Shrinkage cracks on plastering
Displacement of walls
Paint peeling on façade faces of
wall
Broken window glazing, frames,
locks or opening mechanisms
Water seepage through windows
and doors
Broken or damaged exterior doors,
locks, handles or hinges
4 Roof related defect
Improperly sloped gutters
Gutters clogged with debris
Insecurely fastened, damaged or
missing gutter or leader sections
Rainwater runoff from roof not
channeled away from entrances
Straps missing or not nailed

properly
Damaged sheathing
Roof cracking
Distortion of roof or wall at roof
level
Roof sagging
Damaged roof trusses
Moisture or water stains noted in
attic area
Seepage or leakage underside of
roof
5 Water supply system
Inadequate pressure or water flow
at fixtures
Sudden rise in consumption
Signs of leaks or clogged drains
Broken or leaking fixtures
Bathroom sinks not securely
fastened or functioning properly
Toilets not securely anchored
Defective shower or water fixtures
Noisy water pipes and water
hammer
5 Electrical system
Service entrance wires not properly
protected
Loose junction boxes for switches
Or convenience outlets
Stoppage of supply
System breakdown
Heating & Switches
Electric sparks
Exposed branch circuit wiring
noted
Electrical switches or outlets not
working
6 Fire system
Alarm not working
Non-functioning of equipment
7 Lift & Escalator

Stoppage
Occasional overrun
Defective functioning
8 Air condition/Heating system
Not cool enough and/or warm
enough
Noisy, no air movement
Stoppage of supply
Poor functioning
Indicate other types of construction
defects that have not been captured
above and tick causes of them
accordingly. Any feedback is
greatly appreciated.
1
2
3
4
5
If you have any comments regarding to causes of construction defect please note below
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
SECTION THREE: Questions Related to effects of construction defects on Federal

Government office Building Projects
Below are lists of effects of construction defect which will be noticed in building construction
projects. From your experience, please tick the appropriate cell by indicating how much you
agree to listed effects of construction defects in federal government office building project.
Agreement:
1 - Strongly agree 3 - Neutral, 5 –Strongly disagree
2 – Agree 4 - Disagree
Agreement
No. Effects of construction defects
1 2 3 4 5
1 Project delay
2 Construction cost overrun
3 Decrease the value of project
Risk of possible danger on the tenant
4
and/or passenger
5 High maintenance cost
High disputes and possible loss of
6
building
7 Decrease project functionality
It negatively affect contractor and/or
8
consultant reputation
Indicate other effects of construction
defects that have not been captured above
and rank them accordingly. Any feedback
is greatly appreciated.
1
2
3
4
5
If you have any comments regarding to effect of construction defect please note below.
SECTION FOUR: Questions Related to construction defects reducing method on Federal

Government office Building Projects.
Below are lists of reducing procedure of construction defect on building projects. From your
experience, please tick the appropriate cell by indicating how important each method is in
reducing building construction defects on federal government office building project.
Importance:
1 – Not important 2 – Less important, 3 – Moderately important
4 – Important 5 – Very important
Relative importance
No. Defect reducing procedures
1 2 3 4 5
1 An improvement on the lowest tender
system
2 Regular on-the-job training
3 Improving the quality of graphical and
written communication
4 Better and more reliable guidance on
commissioning building and their services
and on defect avoidance
5 Increased and improved feedback to the
designer from all concerned bodies
6 Proper and periodic maintenance
7 Implement a comprehensive quality
control mechanism
8
All building systems need to be
coordinated concurrently, starting with the
planning phase and continuing into the
programming and implementation phases.
9 Periodic and regular construction site
supervision
10 Creating awareness of low-skilled laborers
11 Revoking license of more frequent
defective firm
12 Continuous evaluate the capacity of
consulting and construction firms
13 Develop the capacity of universities and

training institution
Indicate other construction defects
reducing procedures that have not been
captured above and rank them accordingly.
Any feedback is greatly appreciated.
1
2
3
4
5
If you have any comments regarding to defect reducing technique of construction defect please
note below,
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________.
Appendix C: Spearman‟s rank table

Bedru Merhaba PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Bedru Merhaba PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Bedru Merhaba PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

A Study of Construction Defects in Federal Government Office Building Projects in Addis Ababa

Addis Ababa University

(A Case study of Federal Government Office Building Projects)

APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF EXAMINERS

Name Signature Date

Dr. Girmay Kassay ___________________ ____________

Dr. Ephraim Senbetta ___________________ ____________

Eng. Yebeltal Zewedu ___________________ ____________

Ato Samson Walelgn ___________________ ____________

2.2.9. Ceiling Defects………………………………………………...……………………...22

3.8. Analysis and Interpretation ……………………………………………………..……….41

4. ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION

5. CONCLUSION AND RECCOMENDATION

Table 2.1: Common defective plaster rendering & causes.

Figure 4.1: Typical sewerage line

Chapter One: Introduction

1.3. Objective of the study

 To assess the extent of construction defects in building projects

1.5. Scope of the study

1.6. Limitation of the study

Chapter Two: Literature Review

Literatures in area of defects include the followings. [4]

2.1.2. Defect & Failure

Generally defect shall be interpreted as a fault in an element, material or component of a

2.1.3. Defect & Deterioration

2.2. Types and Causes of Defects

Patent and latent defects

Structural and Non-structural defects

According to the Engineering Encyclopedia, structural defect can be categorized as cracks in

Generally, the main causes of dampness in building construction are as follow.

3. Rising damp and flooding

6. Use of the building

7. Moisture in the air

2.2.2. Foundation Defect

2.2.2.1. Settlement & Subsidence

2.2.2.2. Tree root damage

2.2.3. Floor Defect

 Structural inadequacy in floors

ii. Material defects

iii. Workmanship defects

2.2.4. Wall Defect

The main wall defects are as follow, [6]

 Deformation or cracking due to loading

 Movement caused by moisture expansion

2.2.5. Door & Window Defect

Aluminum window system involves assembly of a certain number of components by rivets,

Common door & window defects are as follow,

 Water seepage through door & window frame

 Untidy joints between window & door frame and wall

2.2.6. Roof Defect

2.2.7. Cladding Defect

2.2.8. Plaster rendering defect

Table 2.1: – Common defective plaster rendering & causes. [17]

Common defective plaster rendering Possible causes

2.2.10. Building service Defect

2.2.10.2. Electricity supply

2.3. Summary of causes of construction defect

2.3.1. Design error

2.3.2. Workmanship error

Dr. Girmay Kassay _______

Dr. Ephraim Senbetta _______

Eng. Yebeltal Zewedu _______

Ato Samson Walelgn _______