2.098/6.255/15.093 Optimization Methods Practice True/False Questions
2.098/6.255/15.093 Optimization Methods Practice True/False Questions
2.098/6.255/15.093 Optimization Methods Practice True/False Questions
Part I
For each one of the statements below, state whether it is true or false. Include a 1-3 line
supporting sentence or drawing, enough to convince us that you are not guessing the
answer, but not a comprehensive, rigorous formal justification.
For the next three statements, assume that we are dealing with a linear programming
(minimization) problem in standard form, with the matrix A having full row rank.
d) If a tie occurs while choosing the pivot row during the primal simplex method,
then the next basic feasible solution will be degenerate.
e) If the optimal cost is −∞, then the right hand side vector b can be adjusted in
some way to make the optimal cost finite.
f) The dual of the Phase I problem will never have an infinite optimal cost.
Part II
g) On very degenerate LP problems, the simplex method performs better than interior
point methods.
j) The larger the condition number of the Hessian, the slower the convergence of
Newton’s method.
k) The convergence of the steepest descent method depends highly on the starting
point.
l) For the problem min x s.t. y ≤ x3 , y ≥ 0, the gradients of the constraints satisfy
the constraint qualification condition (CQC).
Solutions
Part I
a) True. Consider P = {x ∈ R : −x ≤ 0, x ≤ 1}. Then x = 0 and x = 1 are the only
basic solutions, but they are also vertices of P .
b) True. Increasing a component of b gives a feasible set which is no smaller, so the
optimal cost cannot increase. (A more complicated way to see this is to take the
dual and invoke a shadow price argument using the sign of the dual variables).
c) True. The dual problem is written as
maximize b′ p
subject to A′ p =c
p ≥ 0.
Part II
g) False. Barrier interior-point methods are unaffected by degeneracy; see BT p. 439.
h) True. KKT conditions hold for a local minimum under the linearly independent
constraint qualification condition (CQC).
i) False. Barrier interior-point methods find an interior point of the face of optimal
solutions. See BT p. 423.
j) False. For example, Newton’s method converges in one iteration for quadratic
problems, regardless of condition number.
3
k) True. Recall the zig-zag phenomenon shown in lecture.
l) False. The only local minimum is (0, 0). At this point, the gradient of the con
straints are linearly dependent.
m) False. Since the KKT are essentially first-order conditions, they can only “see” the
linear part of the objective and constraints, and are thus unable to ensure even
local optimality (unless further conditions, such as convexity, are imposed). As
a simple example, consider the objective function f (x) := −x2 , and the feasible
set defined by g(x) := x ≤ 0. Clearly, the origin x = 0 is a KKT point (since
∇f (x) + u1 ∇g(x) = 0 + 0 · 1 = 0), but it is a local maximum (not a minimum).
MIT OpenCourseWare
http://ocw.mit.edu
For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms.