Predicting Pharmacokinetic Profiles of Sunflower'S (Helianthus Annuus L.) Active Compounds Using in Silico Approach
Predicting Pharmacokinetic Profiles of Sunflower'S (Helianthus Annuus L.) Active Compounds Using in Silico Approach
Predicting Pharmacokinetic Profiles of Sunflower'S (Helianthus Annuus L.) Active Compounds Using in Silico Approach
Abstract
Keywords: Introduction: Sunflower (Heliantus annuus L.) widely known as
Hellianuol medicinal plant for treating several diseases, such as
Sunflower hypertension, allergy, pain, inflammation, and cancer. It contains
Pharmacokinetic profie
various bioactive compounds which some of them were
pkCSM online tool
hellianuols. Hellianuols are a sesquiterpene lactones which
marked by benzene fused 6- to 8-membered cyclic ether ring
structure. To make sure that hellianuols were adequate for
development as a new chemical entities, we predicted some
pharmacokinetic parameters of several hellianuols compounds (A
to L) through in silico approach. Methods: We constructed 3
dimensional structures of hellianuol A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K
and L then generated the SMILE codes of each compound. These
codes then used as main material for running pkCSM online tool
to predict absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion
profile of each compounds. Results: Helianuols predicted to be
well absorbed in intestine (90.793% to 95.384% permeability),
skin (Log Kp: -2.662 to -3.570), and high permeability against
monolayer Caco-2 cell lines (LogPapp: 1.186 to 1.341 ×10-6cm/s).
Unfortunately, it had been predicted that hellianuols poorly
distributed in the body based on volume of distribution at steady
state (VDSS: 0.094 to 0.317) value. But its also predicted that most
of hellianuols had a capability to pass through blood-brain
barriers (LogBBB: up to 0.389) and penetrated into central
nervous system as well. Only hellianuol G, H and K predicted to
be metabolized by CYP1A2 inhibitor and only hellianuol A, B, D,
E and K metabolized by CYP2C19. Also predicted that hellianuols
were excreted in around 0.719 to 1.082 mg/kg/day. Conclusion:
Hellianuols contained in leaf aqueous extract of sunflower
predicted to be a good new pharmaceutical entities candidate
based on its pharmacokinetic profiles.
Figure 1. Chemical structures and common names of the 12 hellianuol compounds investigated in this
study.
Hellianuol
Properties A B C D E F G H I J K L
Empirical C14H20O3 C15H20O3 C16H22O3 C15H22O3 C16H22O3 C15H20O4 C15H20O3 C15H20O3 C15H20O4 C15H20O4 C15H20O3 C15H22O4
formula
Molecular
weight (g/mol) 236.31 248.32 262.34 250.33 262.34 264.32 248.32 248.32 264.32 264.32 248.32 266.33
Absorption
Intestinal
absorption (% 90,793 91,239 91,473 90,763 91,369 94,255 93,800 93,800 92,542 92,542 93,593 95,384
absorbed)
Skin
permeability -3.21 -3,218 -3,241 -3,186 -3,215 -3,570 -2,942 -2,942 -3,314 -3,314 -2,662 -3,109
(log Kp)
Caco-2
permeability
(log Papp in 10-6 1.297 1,283 1,252 1,295 1,295 1,248 1,287 1,287 1,186 1,186 1,341 1,206
cm/s)
P-glycoprotein Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No No Yes
substrate
P-glycoprotein No No No No No No No No No No No No
I inhibitor
P-glycoprotein No No No No No No No No No No No No
II inhibitor
Distribution
Vdss (log L/kg)
0.094 0,150 0,076 0,159 0,172 0,096 0,317 0,317 0,270 0,270 0,193 0,115
BBB
permeability 0.341 0,311 0,296 0,313 0,021 0,092 0,389 0,389 0,112 0,112 0,378 -0,616
(logBB)
Metabolism
CYP2D6 No No No No No No No No No No No No
substrate
CYP3A4 No No No No No No No No No No No No
substrate
CYP1A2 No No No No No No Yes Yes No No Yes No
inhibitor
Renal OCT2
No No No No No No No No No No No No
substrate
ADME, absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion; Papp, apparent permeability coefficient; Kp, skin permeability constant; Vdss, volume of distribution at
steady state; BBB, blood-brain barrier; BB, blood-brain; CNS, central nervous system; PS, permeability-surface area; OCT2, organic cation transporter-2