Laboratory Report 2 Venturimeter I
Laboratory Report 2 Venturimeter I
Laboratory Report 2 Venturimeter I
BSME -3111
Laboratory Report 2
VENTURIMETER
I. Introduction
It is critical to correctly monitor the rate of fluid flow inside a system as a
whole or in part in many of today's industrial operations. This applies equally to
process gases and liquids (e.g. carbon dioxide, nitrogen, liquors, etc.) as well as
compressed air, water, or steam, which are essential to plant functioning. The
turbine-type flow meter, the rotameter, the orifice meter, and the venture-meter are
just a few of the meters used to measure fluid flow.
The phrase "pipe flow rate" is frequently used to describe the rate of flow
through any closed conduit under pressure. The flow rate of a fluid moving under
pressure is measured for a variety of reasons, including invoicing for water service
to homes and businesses, as well as monitoring and process control of a wide
range of industrial operations that include flowing fluids.
Venturimeters are flow measuring equipment that employ a converging
piece of pipe to produce an increase in flow velocity and a corresponding pressure
decrease, which may be used to calculate the flowrate. Clemens Herschel (1842-
1930), a hydraulic engineer, invented the venture meter to monitor the flow rate of
a moving fluid through a pipe. Cast iron, bronze, and steel are used to make venturi
meters. It consists of a diverging portion with a small conical intake, a throat
section, and a long discharge cone known as the converging section. The one end
of a manometer is attached to the point of convergence, while the other end is
attached to the Venturimeter's throat, allowing the manometer to measure the
pressure difference. Figure 1.1 below shows an example of a Venturimeter:
IV. Procedure
1. Select the required pipe diameter, then click the next button to proceed on
to the next step (a pipe with the requisite diameter is chosen, while the
others are kept closed)
2. Select the main inlet valve to allow the water to flow through the selected
diameter pipe.
3. After opening the main inlet valve, select the pipe inlet valve by clicking it.
This allow the water to flow through the selected pipe.
4. Change the knot of manometer from isolate position to air-vent position to
remove the air inside the pipe.
7. Lastly, closed the exit valve of the collecting tank and take the time for the
tank water to rise by 5cm. Observe and calculate the results of the given
trials.
Cd = 0.94
Trial 2:
Calculation of Actual discharge, QA:
Where:
Time taken, t = 17.8 sec
Rise, h = 5cm
𝐴𝑟𝑒𝑎 𝑜𝑓 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑇𝑎𝑛𝑘,𝐴 ×𝑅𝑖𝑠𝑒,ℎ
QA = 𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑒 𝑡𝑎𝑘𝑒𝑛, 𝑡
6750 𝑐𝑚2 ×5𝑐𝑚
QA =
17.8 𝑠𝑒𝑐
Cd = 0.96
Trial 3:
Calculation of Actual discharge, QA:
Where:
Time taken, t = 13.3 sec
Rise, h = 5cm
𝐴𝑟𝑒𝑎 𝑜𝑓 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑇𝑎𝑛𝑘,𝐴 ×𝑅𝑖𝑠𝑒,ℎ
QA = 𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑒 𝑡𝑎𝑘𝑒𝑛, 𝑡
The relationship between actual discharge, QA, and theoretical discharge, Qth, is
seen in the tables above. The table for actual discharge and theoretical discharge is
expected to produce a straight line, indicating that the two variables are directly
proportional to one another. The direct proportional relationship between Qa and Qt
implies very low pressure, energy, turbulence, and friction losses. Furthermore, this
indicates that the value of Cd approaches 1, which in this experiment is denoted with an
average of roughly 0.93. The Cd value can never approach 1, as this would suggest a
perfect situation with no losses. Plus, the Cd value should never exceed 1, since this will
result in an excess of energy at the end of the experiment compared to the beginning.
Furthermore, as seen in the tables above, the value of Cd increases as the initial flow
rate increases, indicating that the value of Cd is more accurate with greater flow rates.
The flow of liquid becomes uniform and less turbulent at high flow rates, with no eddies
forming, reducing energy losses. As a result, the value of Cd is larger at higher flow rates
than at lower flow rates.
The actual flow rate, Qa differs from the theoretical flow rate, Qth because Qa may be
calculated using a variety of formulas, including dividing the fluid volume by the time
required. Theoretical discharge Qth, on the other hand, is calculated using a formula that
combines a manometric reading with the liquid's head losses. In addition, due to friction
losses in actual flow operations, Qt will have a greater flow rate than Qa.
VI. Conclusion
In conclusion, the experiment went off without a hitch. The results show that
increasing the flow rate causes the differential head in the two limbs of the manometer
to rise, which prove and demonstrate the Venturi effect. Furthermore, the average Cd
value obtained is 0.93, indicating a very low error percentage error of (0.5%).
VII. Recommendation
This is an activity that is best learned by experiencing first hand. Students can learn
this knowledge and information more readily and efficiently if they interact physically with
the materials, observe them, and work in a laboratory setting. In terms of the virtual lab,
it guides for users / students regarding the instruments theoretical definition and
application what to do and how to use the venturimeter; it also has given formula on how
to solve the needed data. However, it may lack some explanation, which is also an
important component of students' learning. Overall, I believe that even with this setup, we
will be able to learn how to use venturimeter and calculate the discharge.