Schools

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

Introduction :

 Comparative Literature was established in France during the 19th century


as an academic discipline : France 1816

 It reached America only during the 20th century through the German
scholars who migrated to America from Hitler’s Germany

The French School :

 In the French sense of Comparative Literature, it is the moral


responsibility of every French Comparatist to trace and relate the world
literary experience to the French literary response because , according to
him, the French literature is the backbone of the universal literary
system

 Therefore, they were interested in analysing the external sources and


influence of works. In the French School, Comparative Literature
becomes an ancillary discipline in the field of French literary history

 The French school was too narrow and relied too heavily on factual evidence

 It argued that Comparative literature ought to involve the study of two elements
( two different languages)

 Comparatists of the French School also distinguish between direct / indirect


influence, literary / non-literary influence, positive / negative influence

 Jean Marie Carre, Rene Etiemble, Paul Van Tieghem, Balden-Sperger are some
of the famous French comparatists

The American School :

The other important school is that of the American comparatists from the land
of free and mixed culture

America is called a nation of immigrants in the words of Francois Jost. It is of


many races but the Americans feel attached to their homeland along with their
current American culture. In America, Comparative Literature was encouraged
as an academic discipline in universities and institutions of higher learning

The academic freedom given to the teachers promoted the multiplicity of


literary responses and theories. A healthy tolerance in the field of literary
appreciation was developed; and the scope of Comparative Literature was
widened

The eminent practitioners of the American school are H.H.Remak, Harry


Levin, Verner Freidrich, Francois Jost, Arthur Kumar and many others

The American School:

The American school came as a reaction against the French school.

It is has mainly two fields of study:

 Parallelism:

The parallels between writers and works. It gives no importance to influence

 Intertextuality:

Old texts turn into some sort of raw materials used for the creation of new ones.

The American school, however, was completely different. It was a lot more
liberal. Henry Remak

According to it, anything could be compared with anything else, regardless


even of whether that was literature or not. Interdisciplinary and universal

Unlike the French one, the American school will even allow you to compare a
poem with a song

Differences between French and American Schools :

 The French and the American Schools differ in many aspects

 The French prefer a narrow positivist attitude and the Americans form a
very broad approach to Comparative Literature
 The French scholars created Comparative Literature as a branch of
literary history and a study of International relations as seem in the study
of Byron and Pushkin or Goethe and Carlyle

 The French comparatists are primarily concerned with the study of


Influence of or Reception to an author or authors abroad, i.e. with the
study contactual relation between authors. E.g. Shelley and Bharathi

 To the Americans, it is an aesthetic discipline concerned with the study


of Analogies or Parallels in literature beyond the confines of a particular
country

 It is also a study of the relationship between literature and other arts or


other areas of knowledge

 Through the American approach is broad-based and uninhabited, there is


a possibility that it may encourage a kind of spurious scholarship unless
one is very well- versed in two different areas of knowledge

 Scholars like Ulrich Weisstein favour a more constructive approach

The French analogy studies are favoured by the American comparatists

Comparatists like Van Tieghem are not against such studies provided they
point to common trends. Another distinguished scholar, Rene Etiemble has
given his support to analogy studies and has also demonstrated how well they
can be done

He has also called for a comparative study of such aspects like metrics,
stylistics, etc. He is for a cautious approach to Parallel studies, enthusiastically
recommended by the American comparatists, Remak and Rene Wellek

He is for a parallel study of two writers belonging to the same civilization,


though of different literatures

You might also like