Schools of Comparative Literature-1
Schools of Comparative Literature-1
Schools of Comparative Literature-1
Introduction :
Ø It reached America only during the 20th century through the German
scholars who migrated to America from Hitler’s Germany
Ø The French school was too narrow and relied too heavily on factual
evidence
Ø Parallelism:
Ø Intertextuality:
Old texts turn into some sort of raw materials used for the creation of new
ones.
The American school, however, was completely different. It was a lot more
liberal. Henry Remak
Ø The French prefer a narrow positivist attitude and the Americans form a
very broad approach to Comparative Literature
Comparatists like Van Tieghem are not against such studies provided they
point to common trends. Another distinguished scholar, Rene Etiemble
has given his support to analogy studies and has also demonstrated how
well they can be done
He has also called for a comparative study of such aspects like metrics,
stylistics, etc. He is for a cautious approach to Parallel studies,
enthusiastically recommended by the American comparatists, Remak and
Rene Wellek
Ø It belongs to the state which has the ultimate control over the artist
Ø India is a country where many languages are being spoken and good
creative literatures are produced in all the major languages
Ø Hence, more than any other country in the world. India needs the study
of comparative literature
Ø Ever since comparative literature was introduced in Jadavpur
University, it is emerging as a strong force in India
The Beginnings :
Dravidian School :
Ø He compared the Sangam poetry with the heroic poetry with the
Western Literature. His Tamil Heroic Poetry published in 1966 is the
second step. It is he who coined the term “Oppiyal Ilakkiam” in Tamil.
Again, his book Oppiyal Ilakkiam (Comparative Literature) deals with the
general principles of Comparative Literature. Some of his writings show
his Marxist leanings