Schools of Comparative Literature-1

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 7

SCHOOLS OF COMPARATIVE LITERATURE

Introduction :

Ø Comparative Literature was established in France during the 19th


century as an academic discipline : France 1816

Ø It reached America only during the 20th century through the German
scholars who migrated to America from Hitler’s Germany

The French School :

Ø In the French sense of Comparative Literature, it is the moral


responsibility of every French Comparatist to trace and relate the world
literary experience to the French literary response because , according to
him, the French literature is the backbone of the universal literary system

Ø Therefore, they were interested in analysing the external sources and


influence of works. In the French School, Comparative Literature becomes
an ancillary discipline in the field of French literary history

Ø The French school was too narrow and relied too heavily on factual
evidence

Ø It argued that Comparative literature ought to involve the study of two


elements ( two different languages)

Ø Comparatists of the French School also distinguish between direct /


indirect influence, literary / non-literary influence, positive / negative
influence

Ø Jean Marie Carre, Rene Etiemble, Paul Van Tieghem, Balden-Sperger


are some of the famous French comparatists

The American School :


The other important school is that of the American comparatists from the
land of free and mixed culture

America is called a nation of immigrants in the words of Francois Jost. It


is of many races but the Americans feel attached to their homeland along
with their current American culture. In America, Comparative Literature
was encouraged as an academic discipline in universities and institutions
of higher learning

The academic freedom given to the teachers promoted the multiplicity of


literary responses and theories. A healthy tolerance in the field of literary
appreciation was developed; and the scope of Comparative Literature was
widened

The eminent practitioners of the American school are H.H.Remak, Harry


Levin, Verner Freidrich, Francois Jost, Arthur Kumar and many others

The American School:

The American school came as a reaction against the French school.

It is has mainly two fields of study:

Ø Parallelism:

The parallels between writers and works. It gives no importance to


influence

Ø Intertextuality:

Old texts turn into some sort of raw materials used for the creation of new
ones.

The American school, however, was completely different. It was a lot more
liberal. Henry Remak

According to it, anything could be compared with anything else, regardless


even of whether that was literature or not. Interdisciplinary and universal
Unlike the French one, the American school will even allow you to
compare a poem with a song

Differences between French and American Schools :

Ø The French and the American Schools differ in many aspects

Ø The French prefer a narrow positivist attitude and the Americans form a
very broad approach to Comparative Literature

Ø The French scholars created Comparative Literature as a branch of


literary history and a study of International relations as seem in the study
of Byron and Pushkin or Goethe and Carlyle

Ø The French comparatists are primarily concerned with the study of


Influence of or Reception to an author or authors abroad, i.e. with the
study contactual relation between authors. E.g. Shelley and Bharathi

Ø To the Americans, it is an aesthetic discipline concerned with the study


of Analogies or Parallels in literature beyond the confines of a particular
country

Ø It is also a study of the relationship between literature and other arts or


other areas of knowledge

Ø Through the American approach is broad-based and uninhabited, there


is a possibility that it may encourage a kind of spurious scholarship
unless one is very well- versed in two different areas of knowledge

Ø Scholars like Ulrich Weisstein favour a more constructive approach

The French analogy studies are favoured by the American comparatists

Comparatists like Van Tieghem are not against such studies provided they
point to common trends. Another distinguished scholar, Rene Etiemble
has given his support to analogy studies and has also demonstrated how
well they can be done
He has also called for a comparative study of such aspects like metrics,
stylistics, etc. He is for a cautious approach to Parallel studies,
enthusiastically recommended by the American comparatists, Remak and
Rene Wellek

He is for a parallel study of two writers belonging to the same civilization,


though of different literatures

The Russian School :

Ø Yet another school is the Russian Comparatists, rooted in the


philosophy of Communism

Ø The Russian Comparatists believe that literature is a social property


though is created by an individual artist

Ø It belongs to the state which has the ultimate control over the artist

Ø The creative artists witness the social happenings and present a


realistic account of what they experience

Ø The comparatists probe into such realistic considerations and assess


the kind and variety of social realism which forms the root spirit of
Russian Comparatists

Ø Some of the chief components of Russian school can be mentioned as


Victor Shlovisky, Roman Jakobson, Yury Tynyonov and Zhirmunsky. The
Soviet approach neglects the aesthetic aspect of literature, ignores the
spontaneity of the human mind and it refuses to give credit to the
individual artist

INDIAN SCHOOL OF COMPARATIVE LITERATURE

Ø India is a country where many languages are being spoken and good
creative literatures are produced in all the major languages

Ø Hence, more than any other country in the world. India needs the study
of comparative literature
Ø Ever since comparative literature was introduced in Jadavpur
University, it is emerging as a strong force in India

Ø After the French, American and Russian schools of comparative


literature, Indian comparatists are becoming very popular

The Beginnings :

Ø The Indian School of Comparative Literature was established in 1956 at


Jadavpur University by Doctor Buddhadeva Bose, a popular Bengali poet,
novelist and critic

Ø He established the Department of Comparative Literature in the


Jadavpur University amidst great opposition and protest .

Ø He also edited are reputed journal called The Jadavpur Journal of


Comparative Literature, which carries rare articles on Comparative
Literature

Ø He can be called the Father of Comparative Literature in India

Ø Originally, the Department of Comparative Literature studied the


influence of the 19th century French symbolist poetry on Bengali poetry.
Later, the study was extended to other areas and writers

Ø Arrangements have been made to make elaborate researches on


Bengali and Tamil literatures. Gradually, Comparative Literature spread to
some North Indian and South – Indian Universities

Ø Many Universities have introduced a paper at the Under – Graduate


and Postgraduate levels. A few Universities like Madurai – Kamaraj
University in the South have constituted a separate department for the
study of Comparative Literature

Ø Delhi University has made special provisions for comparative studies


of literature in major Indian languages like Hindi, Bengali and Tamil
Ø Dr. R.K.Das Gupta has taken initiatives in this field. Taking technical
help from experts in the field, the Central University at Hyderabad has
started teaching Comparative Literature. Moreover, researches at the
Ph.D. level have been encouraged and undertaken in many Indian
Universities

Dravidian School :

Ø Dravidian School of Comparative Literature consists of scholars in


Tamil Nadu and Sri Lanka. Two scholars are considered to be pioneers in
the field of Comparative Literature in the south – V.V.S. Iyer and Dr.
Kailasapathy

Ø V.V.S. Iyer made an in – depth study of the Ramayana by Kambar. With


his critical acumen and training in other languages, he compares Kambar
with Homer, Virgil, Milton and Valmiki and establishes him as one of the
greatest epic poets of the world. This, we can call the first step in his field

Ø The next is the step taken by Dr. Kailasapathy of Jaffna University in


Sri Lanka. He made a systematic study of Comparative Literature

Ø He compared the Sangam poetry with the heroic poetry with the
Western Literature. His Tamil Heroic Poetry published in 1966 is the
second step. It is he who coined the term “Oppiyal Ilakkiam” in Tamil.
Again, his book Oppiyal Ilakkiam (Comparative Literature) deals with the
general principles of Comparative Literature. Some of his writings show
his Marxist leanings

Ø Other notable contributions include Thaninayaka Adigal's beautiful


comparisons between the Sangam poetry and Tirukural with the Greek
and Latin literature

Ø Similarly Dr.V.S.P.Manickam compared the concept of love in Sangam


poetry with the heroic love celebrated in Greek poetry. We can also find
awareness and the importance of the comparative angle in the works of
the venerated Tamil scholars like Vaiyapuri Pillai

Madurai – Kamaraj University :


Ø Madurai – Kamaraj University has done yeoman – service to the cause
of Comparative Literature

Ø It is the first University in the whole of South India to open the


Department of English and Comparative Literature

Ø Dr. T.P. Meenakshisundaram's lectures delivered at the Third World


Tamil Conference (1970) and Tamil and Other Cultures, paved the way for
the establishment of Comparative Literature

Ø Dr.V.Sachithanandan, who had his training under the German


Comparatists in America, submitted a paper, “ The Impact of Western
Thought on Bharathi”. He made a detailed research comparing Whitman
and Bharathi

Ø Moreover, he has published a full – length study of Comparative


Literature in Tamil. Renowned scholars are doing their best to promote
Comparative Literature

Principles of the Indian School of Comparative Literature :

Ø The Indian School is like the American School of Comparative


Literature. The scholars here take up comparison between one literature
and the other as well as the comparison between literature and other arts
and disciplines. India offers ample scope for comparative study with her
rich traditions of arts and cultures

Ø Indian comparatists try to unite Indian cultures by comparing and


translating literatures. They help in the understanding of cultures. Indians
take pride in their literatures. Proper comparative studies will bring out the
qualities of each literature

You might also like