Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 30 views

    External Review of Referee Form

    Uploaded by

    Jhing Gonzalvo
    The document appears to be an evaluation form for external reviewers of research papers. It contains 7 criteria for evaluation: Title, Abstract, Introduction, Methodology, Results and Discussion, Conclusions and Direction for Future Use, and Citations and References. Reviewers are asked to rate each criteria on a scale from 1 to 5, provide comments on strengths and weaknesses, and suggestions for improvement. At the end, reviewers must recommend whether the paper should be published as is, with minor revisions, or requires major revisions before publication.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    External Review of Referee Form

    Uploaded by

    Jhing Gonzalvo
    30 views4 pages
    The document appears to be an evaluation form for external reviewers of research papers. It contains 7 criteria for evaluation: Title, Abstract, Introduction, Methodology, Results and Discussion, Conclusions and Direction for Future Use, and Citations and References. Reviewers are asked to rate each criteria on a scale from 1 to 5, provide comments on strengths and weaknesses, and suggestions for improvement. At the end, reviewers must recommend whether the paper should be published as is, with minor revisions, or requires major revisions before publication.

    Original Title

    external review of referee form

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document appears to be an evaluation form for external reviewers of research papers. It contains 7 criteria for evaluation: Title, Abstract, Introduction, Methodology, Results and Discussion, Conclusions and Direction for Future Use, and Citations and References. Reviewers are asked to rate each criteria on a scale from 1 to 5, provide comments on strengths and weaknesses, and suggestions for improvement. At the end, reviewers must recommend whether the paper should be published as is, with minor revisions, or requires major revisions before publication.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    30 views4 pages

    External Review of Referee Form

    Uploaded by

    Jhing Gonzalvo
    The document appears to be an evaluation form for external reviewers of research papers. It contains 7 criteria for evaluation: Title, Abstract, Introduction, Methodology, Results and Discussion, Conclusions and Direction for Future Use, and Citations and References. Reviewers are asked to rate each criteria on a scale from 1 to 5, provide comments on strengths and weaknesses, and suggestions for improvement. At the end, reviewers must recommend whether the paper should be published as is, with minor revisions, or requires major revisions before publication.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    of 4

    UB-M-CPReLL-001 Research Manual

    EVALUATION FORM FOR EXTERNAL REVIEW OF REFEREE

    Instruction: Please rate the paper using the following criteria. On the rating scale, 5 is the
    highest, and 1 is the lowest.

    I. Title
    The title suggests the direction of the research paper 5 4 3 2 1
    The title consists of the important variables of the study 5 4 3 2 1
    II. Abstract
    The abstract provides the executive summary of the study that is clear and free from 5 4 3 2 1
    ambiguity
    The abstract consists of significant keywords which were essentially considered in the 5 4 3 2 1
    conduct of the study
    III. Introduction
    The introduction provides clear objectives of the study 5 4 3 2 1
    It provides a comprehensive literature review with the majority of the sources taken 5 4 3 2 1
    from research journals
    It shows the significance and relevance of conducting the study 5 4 3 2 1
    It offers to fill the gap that has been created by stating what the present study intends to 5 4 3 2 1
    ascertain
    It anchors on the appropriate theoretical framework 5 4 3 2 1
    IV. Methodology
    It uses appropriate research design and procedure 5 4 3 2 1
    It uses valid and reliable research instruments 5 4 3 2 1
    It employs appropriate statistical measures 5 4 3 2 1
    V. Results and Discussion
    It provides accurate data analysis and statistical treatment 5 4 3 2 1
    It presents a clear presentation and interpretation of gathered data 5 4 3 2 1
    It goes beyond factual recount of the findings and cites related studies as to its 5 4 3 2 1
    congruence or dissimilarity
    VI. Conclusions and Direction for Future Use
    It signifies the researcher’s most important discovery from the results of the study 5 4 3 2 1
    It expresses specific implications of the results of the study to the discipline, practice, and 5 4 3 2 1
    future research undertakings
    It presents doable recommendations based on the results of the study 5 4 3 2 1
    VII. Citations and References
    All sources are properly cited, acknowledged, and included in the paper 5 4 3 2 1
    It adheres to APA format 5 4 3 2 1
    TOTAL *

    Comments of the Referee: (Note to Referee: Please fill out all the requested
    information. Please be specific with your suggestions/ recommendations per
    part of the research paper. Attach additional sheet when necessary.)

    1|Page

    Revision No. : 0 Issue Date: December 23, 2016 Revision Date: N/A
    UB-M-CPReLL-001 Research Manual

    Part of the Paper Strengths Weaknesses/ Suggestions/


    Limitations Recommendations
    The abstract must
    have at least one The abstract must concisely
    Title and Abstract or two introductory informs the reader of five vital
    statement/s. information:
    introduction of the topic (one to
    two sentences), the general
    objective of the
    study, methodology (one
    complex sentence), significant
    findings, and
    conclusions.
    Summarize the cited Do necessary paraphrasing of
    lit and studies. the cited paragraphs (3rd and the
    Introduction Group them into 4 to last par.)
    5 paragraphs only.
    For example, all
    global lit and studies
    in the first
    paragraph, ASEAN
    lit, and studies in the
    2nd paragraph, local
    lit, and studies in the
    3rd, gap analysis,
    rationale or
    significance,
    motivation in the 4th,
    and study’s
    objectives as the
    last paragraph.
    Specify the design
    used. (For example, Provide in-text citations of the
    Methodology Descriptive cross- research design used.
    sectional design or
    Descriptive-survey
    design….)
    It must go beyond Please consider the following:
    Results and factual recount of The presentation of each
    Discussions the findings and cite variable must indicate the
    related studies as to interesting facts (textual
    its congruence or format) found in the study
    dissimilarity. included in the discussion.

    2|Page

    Revision No. : 0 Issue Date: December 23, 2016 Revision Date: N/A
    UB-M-CPReLL-001 Research Manual

    The discussion must present the


    interpretation and explanation of
    each
    result, answer the research
    question, justify the approach,
    and critically
    evaluates the study.

    The discussion must present a


    review of findings in the context
    of the
    literature/studies and the
    existing knowledge about each
    variable/result (at
    least 5 in-text citations of
    intercontinental literature/
    studies for each variable).

    The discussion must


    demonstrate the limitations of
    the study and potential
    weaknesses of the interpretation
    of the result.

    Conclusions and
    Direction for Much better if in paragraph
    Future Use format.

    Only traceable online articles


    References must be used and properly cited.

    As an evaluator of the research paper:

    _______________ I highly recommend it for publication.


    _______________ I recommend it for publication subject to minor revisions and
    improvement.
    _______________ No, I cannot recommend if for publication. The paper needs
    major revisions and improvements.

    *Explanation of the Rating obtained:


    3|Page

    Revision No. : 0 Issue Date: December 23, 2016 Revision Date: N/A
    UB-M-CPReLL-001 Research Manual

    RANGE INTERPRETATION

    90-100 Very Good to Excellent Research - The research is considered


    very meritorious and is recommended for publication.

    80-89 Good Research -The research is most likely to be


    recommended for publication subject to minor revisions and
    improvement.

    70-79 Fair Research - The research cannot be recommended for


    the publication needs major revisions and improvements to be
    reconsidered.

    __DAVID C. BUENO____ ____ _____ ___March 29, 2022_

    Referee’s Printed Name Signature Date

    4|Page

    Revision No. : 0 Issue Date: December 23, 2016 Revision Date: N/A

    You might also like