Greek Verbs: An Introduction For The Learner
Greek Verbs: An Introduction For The Learner
Greek Verbs: An Introduction For The Learner
Learner
Note: This guide is primarily about verbs in Modern Greek, but it also gives information
about verbs in Ancient Greek. It is a learner-oriented text, and constitutes part of the author's
pages on the grammar of the Greek language.
Greek verbs change their "morphology" (i.e., mostly their endings) according to voice, tense,
person, number, and mood, while retaining the stem of the verb unchanged. All the above
notions exist also in English, except that English uses primarily syntax to express them, rather
than morphology.
One more difference with English is that one does not need to prepend a personal pronoun to
the verb (as in "you speak"), because the person is signified by the ending of the verb-form (as
is the case in English for the 3rd person, only). If a pronoun is prepended, it signifies
emphasis on the person (as in "you speak now!").
Naturally, there are both regular and irregular Greek verbs (see more below).
A Nontraditional Introduction
It is possible you have already seen one of those traditional introductions to Modern Greek
verbs, presenting the two voices (active and passive), several tenses within each voice
(present, imperfect, past, etc.), and a couple of moods per voice and per tense (indicative and
imperative).
All right, so what is this important characteristic that traditional expositions of Greek verbs do
not present explicitly?
It is that each Greek verb comes in two flavors. Say, vanilla and strawberry.
With the vanilla flavor of the verb you can form certain tenses: present, imperfect, etc.;
while with the strawberry flavor you can form the rest of the tenses: past, future, etc.
And why I call these "flavors" and use such colorful and delicious names for them, like
vanilla and strawberry? (No, not because I hate chocolate! Besides, it is probably worth
calling "chocolate" the "passive strawberry" flavor, as explained below in the section on
passive voice.)
Because calling them the way they are usually called (when they are called anything at all) by
grammarians is bound to perplex the learner. Grammarians often use the terms:
"imperfective", or "progressive stem" for what I call vanilla, and "perfective", or "aorist stem"
for my strawberry. But this is because those grammarians are serious people, and they need
serious terms! My purpose is to educate the learner, not confuse them. Isn't "vanilla" and
"strawberry" so much more tasteful and informative? (I guess you would agree they are as
informative as the terms "imperfective", "aorist", etc.)
With that in mind, let us see which tenses and forms of verbs are possible with each flavor. I'll
use active voice for the moment (passive will be given a little later), and our prototypical verb
will be λύνω (I loosen/solve), always in the 1st person (except in the imperative, where only
the 2nd person exists):
Wow! Are there really so many forms for a single verb in Modern Greek?!
No, not all the above forms are common. In traditional grammar books you usually see the
present, imperfect, past, future, and perfect tenses. What I did above is that I showed what
nuances in meaning we get if we prepend θα or να in front of each form, in a systematic way.
And then I categorized each possibility under one of the two flavors, to show that there really
are exactly two of them: one with stem -λυν-, and another with stem -λυσ-. And this is true for
all Greek verbs! (Even the ancient ones! for those, see more at the end of this text.)
Observations:
But just because we saw the regular λύνω, doesn't mean we've learned everything about
regular verbs! The latter come in various patterns. Λύνω follows only one (very common)
pattern. There are several main patterns, and even sub-patterns within the main ones, for
regular verbs. By clicking here you'll see a page that describes such regular patterns and gives
examples for the verbs that appear among the 1000 most common words in Greek. Each
example is given showing the present and imperfect forms (vanilla), followed by their past
and subjunctive/future forms (strawberry), as follows:
παίζω (I play); έπαιζα (I was playing) || παίξω (to/will play); έπαιξα (I played)
Here is a table of contents for the page that describes patterns of regular verbs in more detail:
Visit this page now for more information on modern regular verbs.
Irregular Verbs
Just like λύνω/λύσω, the vanilla/strawberry idea applies to every Greek verb. And I mean
every one of them, even the irregulars. Take, for example, the irregular βλέπω (I see). This
verb is also irregular in English: its irregularity consists of a special form for the past (saw)
and another one for the past participle (seen). But there is at least a common element in all
three forms: they start with the consonant s-. In Greek, "irregularity" may mean that the
vanilla flavor has no relationship whatsoever with the strawberry, not even a common
consonant. Thus, the past tense of βλέπω is είδα. But still, as you'll see below, the vanilla is
formed consistently with the stem -βλεπ-, and the strawberry consistently with the stem -δ-.
Let's see this irregular verb:
You probably noticed that even the past tense and imperative of this verb are irregular: for
example, the past is not formed by prepending έ-, but εί-; and the imperative is not δέσε!,
which means another thing (tie!), but δες!.
There are only two more Greek verbs that show a total unrelatedness between their vanilla
and strawberry flavors: λέω, or λέγω (I say), which in the past is: είπα, and τρώω (I eat), the
past of which is έφαγα. All other irregular verbs are irregular not because their vanilla and
strawberry are like the day and the night, but because their strawberry doesn't fall under one
of the regular patterns, given the vanilla form (for example: βρίσκω = I find; past: βρήκα = I
found); or because they lack most of the forms above, such as the auxiliaries είμαι (I am) and
έχω (I have); or because their vanilla is identical to their strawberry, such as κάνω (I do; I
make); and so on. Don't worry, as in most languages, the irregular verbs are few in number.
But alas also as in most languages that have irregular verbs they are the most common
ones. (Naturally, because their everyday usage didn't allow them to be "eroded" and evolve,
and so be regularized.) So they are very important, and one has to learn them if one wants to
master the language. By clicking here you'll see a page that lists the irregular verbs that
appear among the 1000 most common Greek words. Each irregular verb is given in a table
that includes its vanilla and strawberry stems, just as above.
Visit this page now for more information on modern irregular verbs.
Passive Voice
The passive voice (e.g., I am loosened), too, comes in two flavors. Vanilla is always plain
vanilla, identical with the active one, but the passive endings tell us that the form is passive.
The second flavor, I'll call it chocolate instead of "passive strawberry", because occasionally
it cannot be derived from the other two flavors, so it deserves a name of its own. Usually,
however (esp. in regular verbs), the two stems can be derived easily from the corresponding
active ones. For example, the active λύνω becomes λύνομαι in the passive voice. Thus, the
vanilla stem -λυν- acquires a different ending (-ομαι) and thus signifies passive voice in the
present tense. The ending -όμουν (i.e., λυνόμουν) forms the passive imperfect. The chocolate
stem is -λυθ-. Thus, the passive subjunctive is λυθώ, and the passive past is λύθηκα. What this
means is that knowing the two passive stems (which are usually derivable from the active
ones) and the proper endings (which are standardized, and their patterns are very few
compared to the active ones) one can figure out the passive forms of a regular verb. The
conjugation of passive λύνομαι is given below.
Observations
1. Once again, there is no distinction between simple and progressive passive present.
Whether an action is performed habitually (I am loosened every morning) or
progressively (I am being loosened right now), the form in Greek is one: λύνομαι.
2. Did you notice the added past participle? It is at the end of the chocolate flavor
(because it often has that flavor, although this verb is not good at revealing it). Notice
that the past participle is an adjectival form (plays the role of an adjective, as in a
loosened knot), and as such it has the properties of adjectives: it has three genders
(neuter: λυμένο, feminine: λυμένη, masculine: λυμένος), four cases, two numbers, and
it must agree in all these with the noun it qualifies.
One more thing about the past participle: the phrase the knot is loosened in English is
ambiguous. It may mean: the knot is loosened, it's not tight anymore, which is using
the past participle as an adjective (a "predicate"), and in Greek this is: ο κόμπος είναι
λυμένος. Or, it may mean: the knot is loosened every morning, which is passive simple
present tense, and in Greek is translated as: ο κόμπος λύνεται. Thus, Greek
disambiguates this phrase. Unfortunately, the latter sentence (ο κόμπος λύνεται) is
itself ambiguous: besides the progressive and habitual meaning (just mentioned), it
may also mean that the knot is "loosenable", i.e., that it is possible to loosen this knot.
So much for one-to-one translation between English and Greek passive forms.
3. "Will be being, to be being" what kind of English is that? (See vanilla flavor,
future, subjunctive, and imperative progressive.)
Sorry. Not my fault. The Greek language uses quite often some forms that are rare in
English, and hard to render naturally. For example, consider this: you still have time to
answer your message while I will be getting dressed up. This "will be getting [verb]-
ed" is the passive progressive future in Greek. Here is the whole sentence translated:
έχεις ώρα να απαντήσεις το μήνυμά σου όσο εγώ θα ντύνομαι. An example of the
passive progressive subjunctive: I don't like to be getting caught up in trouble: δεν μου
αρέσει να μπλέκομαι σε φασαρίες. An example of passive progressive imperative (a
piece of advice, especially apt for Americans who want to live for awhile in Europe
): when you go out dress up neatly: όταν βγαίνεις έξω, να ντύνεσαι καλά here it is a
habitual aspect which is conveyed, rather than a progressive one. Contrast this with the
passive simple imperative: when you go to the interview dress up neatly: όταν πας για
τη συνέντευξη, να ντυθείς καλά (you are supposed to go once to the interview, so you'll
dress up once only).
Middle Voice
Middle vanilla flavor: stem -λυν- Middle strawberry flavor: stem -λυσ-
Present λύνομαι I am [being] loosened Imperative Middle λύσου! get loosened!
Observations
1. The middle stem -λυσ- is derived from (and is often identical to) the active strawberry
stem.
2. However, conceptually the middle voice is closer to the passive, hence I used λύνομαι,
the passive form, as middle present. In the ancient language, the middle-voice forms
were identical to the passive forms in all tenses, except in the past ("aorist") and
future.
So, what is this "middle voice"? What is its meaning? On what occasions is it used?
Although the forms of this voice have been assimilated into the passive (save for the single
one shown above), conceptually this voice is very alive in the mind of a native speaker of
Greek. It occurs when a person does something upon themselves. In English we don't make
this distinction. For example, suppose a toddler is dressed up by their mother. That's passive
voice: the subject (the toddler) is [verb]-ed by another agent (the mother). But now, suppose I
am dressed up, i.e., I dress up myself, as every adult usually does. That's middle voice. As
you see, there is no change in form in English (it's "dressed", either way), nor would there be
a different form in Greek; the difference is conceptual only.
Why is it important to know this, since there are no different middle forms, save for a single
one?
First, you won't understand why some Greek verbs have only seemingly-passive forms (they
should be construed as middle) and no active ones. Take, for example, the verb I think. In
English, this is an active verb; it has its passive counterpart, of course (an idea can be thought
of), but normally, when you do the thinking, you think in an active sense. In Greek, the
conceptualization of what is going on in this case is slightly different. The person who thinks
does something upon themselves (modifying their mental state, presumably). Thus, the verb
for think is σκέφτομαι (notice the passive but actually middle ending -ομαι), and the
imperative (think!) is σκέψου! (compare with λύσου! above). For similar reasons, three more
verbs that concern mental states have middle-voice forms only: remember (θυμάμαι,
imperative θυμήσου!), sleep (κοιμάμαι, imperative κοιμήσου!), and imagine (φαντάζομαι,
imperative φαντάσου!). Last, but not least, the auxiliary verb to be (είμαι, I am) is such a
middle-voice-only verb (with no pure imperative form, though; if we want to say be there! we
have to say να είσαι εκεί!).
And second, occasionally the middle voice adds a totally new meaning to the verb. For
example, take the verb βρίσκω, meaning I find. Hence, its passive & middle form, βρίσκομαι.
Now, its passive meaning is: "I am found by someone else", as in: η λύση βρέθηκε από μια
διάνοια ("the solution was found by a genius"). Its middle meaning, though, is quite different:
it has the sense of "being at a place", as in: αυτή τη στιγμή βρίσκομαι στην πλατεία ("at this
moment I am at the square"). Another example: ξεχνάω, or ξεχνώ (a contracted verb),
meaning I forget, hence its passive & middle form, ξεχνιέμαι. In its passive sense it means the
(expected) "I am forgotten by someone", i.e., forgotten in the memory of a person/some
people. In its middle sense ξεχνιέμαι means a completely different thing: "I forget my current
worries (e.g., by busying myself with smth. else)", and this sense is probably more common
than the passive one. Such shades in meaning cannot be understood if the difference between
passive and middle voice is not grasped.
What would be examples of situations in which the middle imperative ought to be used?
Suppose we deal with the verb lose (χάνω) instead of loosen (so that its middle imperative
will make more sense). Then the meaning of get lost! is rendered accurately neither with να
χάνεσαι! (progressive attitude), nor with να χαθείς! (passive imperative: be lost, but some time
later). It is rendered through the middle imperative, χάσου! (If you want to know the exact
idiom "get lost!", here it is: "άι χάσου!"; but make sure you use it prudently, if you ever utter
it. ) Here is another example: [the parent says to the child] you are full of dirt, go now and
wash up yourself! γέμισες βρωμιές, πήγαινε αμέσως και πλύσου! (verb: πλένω.) The "do
something to oneself" is the hallmark of middle voice.
Traditional Views
For the learner's benefit, it might be useful to compare the above (delicious) approach with
some more traditional (tasteless) ones. What one usually finds in books on Greek grammar
(whether Modern or Ancient) is the conjugation of a sample verb in each of the two voices
(three in the ancient language), and all tenses, moods, and so on. Hence, that's what the linked
pages show, below.
The following pages give the conjugation of the verb λύνω (ancient: λύω) in all voices (this
verb is the all-time-favorite of Greek grammar books):
Active Voice
Passive Voice
Middle Voice (Note: Ancient Greek only, and differs from the passive voice only in
the aorist and future tenses.)
Also, the auxiliary verb είμαι (I am, Modern Greek), or ειμί (I am, Ancient Greek) is given in
this page.