C.P. 397 2022

a
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN

(Appellate Jurisdiction)
PRESENT:
Mr. Justice tjmar Ata Bandial, CJ
Mr. Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah
Mrs. Justice Ayesha A. Malik
Civil Petition No.397 of 2022

and
CMA 751 of 2022 in C.P. No.397 of 2022
[Against judgment dated 16.2.2022 passed by the Islamabad High Court
Islamabad in WP No.527/20221
Muhammad Faisal Vawda Petitioner(s)

Versus
Election Commission of Pakistan, through . .Respondent(s)
its Secretary and others
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Wasim Sajjad, Sr. ASC
Mr. Moiz Ahmed, ASC
For Respondent No.1 : Mr. Sajeel Sheryar Swati, ASC
Mr. Muhammad Arshad, DG (Law)
Ms SaimaTa.riqJanjua, DD (Law)
ECP

For Respondent 6 Mr. Farooq H. Naek, Sr. ASC
Ch. Aamir Rehman, Addl. AGP.
On Court's Notice:
25.11.2022
Date of Hearing
ORDER
UMAR ATA BANDIAL, W. The petitioner, Muhammad

Faisal Vawda, at the very outset, stated before the Court
today that he regrets the claim of renunciation of US
Nationality in his nomination papers filed for NA-249
Karachi on 07.06.2018. He states that he had applied for
such renunciation before the date of filing of his nomination
papers. However, in fact his Certificate of Loss of Nationality
of the US was issued on 25.06.2018. As a result of the
CF No.397 of 2022. etc.
2
difference in the dates he was actually disqualified from
contesting the election on the date when he filed his
nomination papers for the election of MNA under the
provisions of Article 63(1)(c) of the Constitution.
Consequently, the affidavit which he filed alongwith his
nomination papers made an erroneous statement. He regrets
that and accepts that he stood disqualified to be elected to
the National Assembly. Although the petitioner was elected
to the office of Senator of Pakistan in the year 2021,
however, to demonstrate good faith, hereby he resigns from
that office.
2. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties
and have perused the record. The Election Commission of
Pakistan ("ECP") has, in exercise of its powers under Article
218(3) of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan
1973 ("Constitution") read with Section 8(c) of the Elections Act
2017, decided upon the matter of pre-election qualification and
disqualification of the petitioner, in respect of his election as a
member of the National Assembly as well as a member of the
Senate. The ECP has declared the petitioner disqualified for both
elections on account of his filing a false affidavit as to his
citizenship of a foreign country under Article 63(1)(c) and 62(1)(f)
of the Constitution, and has also withdrawn the notification
whereby he had been declared the returned candidate for a seat
of the Senate.
3. As per the judgments of this Court in Muhammad
Salman v. Naveed An/urn (2021 SCMR 1675) and Zulfigar
I/ Bhatti v. E.C.P (CA. No. 142 of 2019 decided on 02.11.2022), the

CF No.397 o12022, etc.
3
ECP has no jurisdiction under Article 218(3) of the Constitution
read with Section 8(c) or 9(1)of the Elections Act 2017 to inquire
into and decide upon the matter of pre-election qualification and
disqualification of a returned candidate. Therefore, the decision of
the ECP was without jurisdiction. The Islamabad High Court
found that the petitioner was disqualified pursuant to the case
reported as Speaker. National Assembtz, of Pakistan,
Islamabad and others. v. Habib Akram and others (PLD 2018
SC 678) for submitting a false affidavit hence no declaration was
required. Therefore, it was concluded that the consequences given
in case reported as Sarni ULlah Baloch and others v. Abdul
Karim Nousherwani and others (PLD 2018 SC 405) would
follow. By finding that a formal declaration by a court of law was
not required to disqualify the petitioner under Article 62(1)(f) of
the Constitution, the impugned judgment has in its paras 11, 12
and 13 therefore misconstrued both the Habib Akram case and
the Sarni Ullah Baloch case. Resultantly, the impugned judgment
is legally not sustainable. The present petition filed under Article
185(3) of the Constitution is therefore converted into appeal and
the same is allowed by setting aside both the said decisions.
4. The petitioner states before the Court that he regrets
his claim of renunciation of the U.S. nationality at the time of
filing his nomination papers for the election of NA-249, Karachi,
on 07.06.2018. He further states that he had then initiated the
process for such renunciation, but the "Certificate of Loss of
Nationality of the U.S." was issued to him on 25.06.2018. He
admitted that he was disqualified from contesting the election
under Article 63(1)(c) of the Constitution, on the date when he
had filed his nomination papers for the election of NA-249,

CP No.397 of 2022, etc. 4
Karachi, and that his affidavit filed with the nomination papers
thus contained an erroneous statement, which he regrets. In
order to demonstrate his good faith in remorse for his mistake, he
undertakes that he will resign from the office of the member of
the Senate to which was elected.
5. In view of the said statement and undertaking of the
petitioner, we are of the opinion that we need not proceed further
in the matter in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the ease.
The petitioner shall be bound to comply with his undertaking and
shall take immediate steps to present his resignation to the
Chairman, Senate, in accordance with law. It is clarified that the
petitioner shall not be considered disqualified in any subsequent
election, on the basis of the instant matter.
Chief Justice
2--
Judge
Judge
Islamabad,
25th November, 2022.
Not approved for reporting
Iqba(

C.P. 397 2022

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

C.P. 397 2022

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

C.P. 397 2022

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

a

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN

Civil Petition No.397 of 2022

Muhammad Faisal Vawda Petitioner(s)

UMAR ATA BANDIAL, W. The petitioner, Muhammad

difference in the dates he was actually disqualified from

contesting the election on the date when he filed his

nomination papers for the election of MNA under the

provisions of Article 63(1)(c) of the Constitution.

Consequently, the affidavit which he filed alongwith his

nomination papers made an erroneous statement. He regrets

that and accepts that he stood disqualified to be elected to

the National Assembly. Although the petitioner was elected

to the office of Senator of Pakistan in the year 2021,

however, to demonstrate good faith, hereby he resigns from

2. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties

and have perused the record. The Election Commission of

Pakistan ("ECP") has, in exercise of its powers under Article

218(3) of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan

1973 ("Constitution") read with Section 8(c) of the Elections Act

2017, decided upon the matter of pre-election qualification and

disqualification of the petitioner, in respect of his election as a

member of the National Assembly as well as a member of the

elections on account of his filing a false affidavit as to his

citizenship of a foreign country under Article 63(1)(c) and 62(1)(f)

of the Constitution, and has also withdrawn the notification

whereby he had been declared the returned candidate for a seat

3. As per the judgments of this Court in Muhammad

Salman v. Naveed An/urn (2021 SCMR 1675) and Zulfigar

I/ Bhatti v. E.C.P (CA. No. 142 of 2019 decided on 02.11.2022), the

ECP has no jurisdiction under Article 218(3) of the Constitution

into and decide upon the matter of pre-election qualification and

disqualification of a returned candidate. Therefore, the decision of

the ECP was without jurisdiction. The Islamabad High Court

found that the petitioner was disqualified pursuant to the case

reported as Speaker. National Assembtz, of Pakistan,

Islamabad and others. v. Habib Akram and others (PLD 2018

SC 678) for submitting a false affidavit hence no declaration was

required. Therefore, it was concluded that the consequences given

in case reported as Sarni ULlah Baloch and others v. Abdul

Karim Nousherwani and others (PLD 2018 SC 405) would

follow. By finding that a formal declaration by a court of law was

not required to disqualify the petitioner under Article 62(1)(f) of

the Constitution, the impugned judgment has in its paras 11, 12

and 13 therefore misconstrued both the Habib Akram case and

the Sarni Ullah Baloch case. Resultantly, the impugned judgment

is legally not sustainable. The present petition filed under Article

185(3) of the Constitution is therefore converted into appeal and

the same is allowed by setting aside both the said decisions.

4. The petitioner states before the Court that he regrets

his claim of renunciation of the U.S. nationality at the time of

filing his nomination papers for the election of NA-249, Karachi,

on 07.06.2018. He further states that he had then initiated the

process for such renunciation, but the "Certificate of Loss of

Nationality of the U.S." was issued to him on 25.06.2018. He

admitted that he was disqualified from contesting the election

under Article 63(1)(c) of the Constitution, on the date when he

had filed his nomination papers for the election of NA-249,

thus contained an erroneous statement, which he regrets. In